Friedman IR-X vs SS-100V2 | Shootout

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @djentrified
    @djentrified 4 месяца назад +3

    Thank you for the comparison!

  • @svenzia
    @svenzia 4 месяца назад +1

    Thanks man. Interesting. The SS-100V2 is a beast.

    • @sir.shreddington
      @sir.shreddington  4 месяца назад +1

      It really is. Super versatile for any situation. Plus the blacked out look is just 🤌

    • @svenzia
      @svenzia 4 месяца назад +1

      @@sir.shreddington Dream amp imo 🙂

  • @paulmales1889
    @paulmales1889 4 месяца назад +2

    Honestly liked the irx better here , but both together was absolutely killer .

    • @sir.shreddington
      @sir.shreddington  4 месяца назад

      Yeah man, it sounds solid! The only thing that I don’t like about it that I forgot to mention is that the IR-X is not grounded, so it can be kind of noisy when it’s not plugged into anything.

    • @Jarrodpimental
      @Jarrodpimental 3 месяца назад

      Probably because he recorded straight out of the irx and he had to mic a cabinet for the ss100. Many more variables when you have to mic something vs direct.

  • @ShawnShipstad
    @ShawnShipstad 2 месяца назад

    I like the sound of the IR-D the best. More versatile, unless you are sworn to always having a ton of heavy distortion. Which is great if that is all you want to play.-I do love Friedman products.

  • @jacktaromino6324
    @jacktaromino6324 4 месяца назад

    Hi that was a awesome shootout and it convinced me for only the money reasons the pedal is great but do love the amp too. What do you think of the new Bogner ultra 150 watt kt88 tube head?

    • @sir.shreddington
      @sir.shreddington  4 месяца назад

      Thanks Jack! I haven’t played the kt88 version but I do have the El34 version that I went pretty in depth with in some older videos. I went with the el34 because you can also swap for kt88s in that version, so you get the best of both worlds. As far as 100w vs 150w, 100w is plenty of head room for me.

  • @Dr.Jekyll
    @Dr.Jekyll 2 месяца назад

    SS100V2!!!!! Woohoo! IRX sounds good, too, but that SS is bad ass! Good job!

    • @sir.shreddington
      @sir.shreddington  2 месяца назад

      Thanks dude! And I agree, the SSv2 is just 🤌

    • @Dr.Jekyll
      @Dr.Jekyll 2 месяца назад

      @@sir.shreddington lol. You must be Italian

    • @sir.shreddington
      @sir.shreddington  2 месяца назад

      @Dr.Jekyll haha close, I’m Greek. I married an Italian

  • @Tanax13
    @Tanax13 2 месяца назад

    4:58 I'm confused. Both are tube amps? The IRX has 2 tubes in it. Cool comparison otherwise!

    • @sir.shreddington
      @sir.shreddington  2 месяца назад +1

      Thanks! The irx has a couple preamp tubes, but no power tubes.

  • @mrnorbotron3308
    @mrnorbotron3308 2 месяца назад

    Speaker/Mics or IRs are making 99% of the sound. You didn't compared the amps, you compared the IRs. Comparing amps without the exact IRs or Speaker/Mics are pointles.

  • @gizemkayhan9245
    @gizemkayhan9245 Месяц назад

    ir x better torpedo captor sucks

  • @matteomidas638
    @matteomidas638 3 месяца назад

    Great video!!! Do you think that the SS Head with a boost in front is able to do new metal chugga chugga palm muting? Thank you 👍

    • @sir.shreddington
      @sir.shreddington  3 месяца назад

      Thanks! Yeah man, it’s a great pedal platform. With something like a precision drive or SD-1, it’s no problem at all

    • @matteomidas638
      @matteomidas638 3 месяца назад

      @@sir.shreddington Thank you very much for the super kind reply. I really appreciate your videos! 😊

    • @sir.shreddington
      @sir.shreddington  3 месяца назад

      @@matteomidas638 Cheers!