After watching this video with my wife over dinner, I'm afraid our minds haven't changed. We would remain as a DINK. Thank you for sharing your perspective.
Agree! Add ko pa to: may mga mentally not fit din maging parents. Pressure lang naman yan sa community na di ka kumpleto o sinumpa ka pag wala kang anak
You talk like as if family is defined by numbers. As if having kids is like having a car with upkeep. You don't "acquire" kids bc you're financially capable but rather you can compromise. Emotional and financial stability is a false guarantee of a good family that post-modernist society is trying to impose which fails my material family (They were able to raise their kids, including my mom, into a well-educated person bc they can "afford" and my maternal grandparents are not just financially able but also emotionally). Wisdom is the most important.
Your point is valid but think about how many people in China and India are living way below the poverty line. When you have an overabundance of workers, businesses can get away with offering lower wages because of supply and demand. Balance lang dapat. Let people be. Most of them will have kids and some will not. Ideally maintain lang dapat ang population na sustainable both sa economy and environment ^^
Lol kahit pobre may income. Papaano nila papakainin anak nila? Sa kakarampot na 4ps. Alam mo kung anong mas malala? Yong pinag-aral ka tapos wala ka namang alam😅😅
Hays. Kaninang aga noong papunta ako sa aking paaralan, may nakita akong homeless couples na merong limang anak (isa sa kanila ay sanggol pa). Nakaka depressing. Tapos meron pang mga t@nga kagaya ni Joy na dapat paramihin pa ang populasyon ng Pilipinas 😵💫
Keep up the good work Jay! You are one of the very few bright lights in PH podcast scene who resists pagan ideas masquerading as "progressive". Akala ng mga tao ngayon makalumang isipan ang Catholic moral and social teachings, ang di nila alam ang liberal ideas ay makalumang isipan din ng mga pagano. The family is the most important unit of a great society. The moment we prioritize pleasure and convenience is the moment our civilization declines. We need more podcasters like you Jay who hold the line.
@@eryalmario5299 may masamang epekto ito sa ekonomiya kung marami ang maging DINKs. Nawa'y napanood niyo sana ang video until the end. Salamat po sa tanong na ito.
@@JayAruga I did watch it and I think your opinion has no basis in reality and in some cases can even be considered as out of touch and misconstrued kasi di lahat ng couples ay dual income with no kids. The way you said that in the video - no children = aging population= bad is not our reality e ksi may iba't ibang paraan para hindi tayo magkaroon ng problema sa demographics natin and it's not just with young people having kids.
Hays obviously you're just trying to clickbait for deleting comments that would not give you more views. (summarizing it for others to save them 10 mins) anyway, good luck with your campaign. I don't hate your ideology. Kids are essential to life but we don't enforce them to others
@@roochedigital4893 I'm not really enforcing it I'm making people think. If their main reason for not having kids is the economy, guess what, that decision is bad for the economy in the long run.
My father was a pedicab driver (sidecar boy), my mother is a highly street smart woman. Then my father, unfortunately, died when I was 10 leaving 4 kids still studying, not 1 has finished school that time. My mother almost sold her soul to the devil just to make sure we live. When I was in college, my brother and sister had babies without finishing school. My mother had to carry the burden of raising grandkids because the father of my sister's kid was a dick. My brother on the other hand was able to finish a vocational course and started earning minimum wage, it got better, but it was never enough. Guess where we all lived? Yes, under one roof. I went through the final year of high school without electricity. Our roof had fist size holes, which meant that we had artificial waterfalls inside our unfurnished house. When I finished college, I was severely underpaid and yet overworked and overstressed. Things are getting better for us all, even for my mom. But it's still far from comfortable. And now you have the audacity to tell us to have children in this godforsaken country where the only ones who actually get better lives are syndicate members, porn stars, those who are willing to make a fool of themselves on camera and those who are willing step on other people with fraudulent businesses. Not to mention, most of the politicians here sold their souls to the devil. You want me to pass on the miseries I had, my detest in life, to another child? Just because you are doing fairly better in life? Time to question the "Catholicity" of your content, Jay. Are you upholding the teachings of the church? Or are you blinded by your perspective. Let me be clear. The teachings of the church does not change when it comes to family and that is well iterated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and JPII's Humanae Vitae, but let's face it, we are a third-world country. We are poor, not by choice.
Materialism is rampant in the comment section. DINK is self serving materialistic ideology... this kind of ideology will just lead to emptiness... mas mahirap buhay dati pero mas madami mag anak mga tao pero naka survive naman sila... pakulo lang ng mga anti natalist na biniblame ang population sa kahirapan... USA, china, south korea, japan and madaming mayaman na bansa nag s suffer na ngayon sa population decline... kaya madami na ring mayayaman na bansa ang tumatanggap ng immigrants na napakarami dahil doon sila bumabawi para mapunan yung pababa nilang population at work force... philippines birth replacement rate is on the decline also...
It's true people "survived" but how many of those "survivors" do you think can say they're actually happy and content with the state of their lives growing up and now? It may be true that population growth is good for the economy in the long run but we need security NOW, not 10 years from now. The point is, DINKs should be free to be DINKs without this criticism and being called "selfish". If you want to grow the population of this country single-handedly go ahead, mag-anak ka ng 12 but if others don't feel like doing so, don't crucify them. Also, isn't it also "self-serving" if you'd like to grow a family because you wouldn't want to feel "empty"?
@@LeonardCupat halatang na consume ka na ng materialism. Happiness is temporary and it requires a sustainability like consumerism (philosophical or material things). You can observe also in nature that "happiness" is not a fact of life but tragedy. DINKs are selfish bc they can't compromise their own happiness for others (meaning a child). They just want to take all of their labor for themselves as a "drug" to deny the fact of life. They excuse themselves from tragedy by sustaining a consumerist lifestyle and having a child would compromise that. And they excuse themselves from having such belief by giving a sympathy to someone that doesn't even exist (the child they choose not to have).
@@baepedro Halatang na-consume ka naman ng bias. Why is it that the first reason people assume DINKs choose the lifestyle they choose is because they're selfish? And let me guess... when you think of DINKs, you imagine a couple that is earning P45k+ a month each don't you? Try thinking they are earning a third of that, then maybe you'd understand. I want a kid for myself too and me and my partner wouldn't probably be DINKs but unlike you, I understand I'm in no position to shame those who choose to live that way.
@@LeonardCupat If you're DINKs and still earning 15k per month at least go to the city find a job in retail or manufacturing and earn at least 12k per head. That is if you got a real intention of having kids. You have to compromise. Take a risk. It is the reason why I said "they can't compromise for others". Surely you can't be a consumerist if you can only afford to pay for living. It is not the bias that I am consuming, it is the logic.
@@JayAruga if your only earning 630 a day in metro manila goodluck prang di mo sinama ung 50%+ na minimum wage earners sa pinas.. ako nga na 630 a day hirap tpos bread winner pa ako sa 5 magkakapatid tpos ako pa bumubuhay sa magulang ko>?? sa tingin mo makakapag anak pa ako
"Hindi magastos sa kapricho" lol 'yong pamilyadong tao pwede pa pero dito sa pinagtatrabahuan kong factory naka-iphone mga minimum wage walang 10k below maliban sa bagong pasok tapos branded pa mga damit. Talo pa kami ng mga squatter naka aircon tapos may fiber connection.
Napaka out of touch mo naman sa sinabi mo tungkol sa pag pili ng pulitiko na may anak andami daming pulitiko diyan na may anak pero pulpol pero ano pa nga bang aasahan mo sa isang conservative diba? Ayos na yan na bumagsak ang bansa dahil kulang ang workers para magkaron naman tayo ng bagong sistema, pero kase nga conservative ka nakakulong kana sa makalumang pag iisip. Time will tell kung naging mabuting ama ka sa mga anak mo, kung makasalita ka kala mo lahat ng tao ay magiging mabuting mga magulang.
Ano pa nga bang maasahan namin sa woke na kagaya mo, diba? Lahat na lang ng uso sa West, gagayahin kaya sabog-sabog na ang moralidad natin sa bansa. Tapos kunwari concern ksa sa kinabukasan eh nihilist ka naman. Mas balanse naman mag-isip mga convervatives kesa sa mga woke na kain nang kain ng poopoo ng West.
Tignan mo lang baka yong pinagtatrabahuan mo ay pinapatakbo ng isang pamilya o baka. O siguro sa inyong pamilya kailangan magbotohan para malaman kung sino ang masusunod, makaluma na ang pamilya so kahit sanggol pwede nang magdesisyon sa lahat. O pati estado makaluma na rin ilang libong taon na ganiyan. Pati na rin logic baguhin mo na rin since bago pa ang panahon nila Plato ginagamit na yan. Isama mo na utak mo kasi ilang bilyon na rin na ganiyan ang design, palitan mo na rin para naman may masabi kang matinong arguments.
@@baepedro Okay na ho sana lolo kaso hinahanap ko din yung argument mo? Literal na nag yap ka lang at feeling may alam kana porket may mileage na yang edad mo po mano po!
Bat d k mag pasa ng batas na illigal and DINK yung 1 taon ng kasal pero walang anak at yung mga 1 o 3 bawal din dapat 5 o 15 anak pra masaya ikukulong yung magasawa walang anak
Simple lng yan kase nasa taas ka na nasa middle incomd k p may youtube k pa pero kung nasa low income ka at informal settler ka mapagsalita k p kaya tulad ng sinasabi mo ngayon?
Life here on earth is not about us. DINK is practical atheism. It is definitely not God’s plan and vision for mankind. It has been a recurring human folly to choose SELF over God’s will.
After watching this video with my wife over dinner, I'm afraid our minds haven't changed. We would remain as a DINK. Thank you for sharing your perspective.
Ang daming hindi kasal pero maagang nagkakaanak, dapat mas worried tayo sa teenage pregnancy kaysa DINK.
Having kids is expensive, and not everyone can afford. Kesa naman maganak ng di kaya financially and emotionally at iasa sa gobyerno
Agree! Add ko pa to: may mga mentally not fit din maging parents. Pressure lang naman yan sa community na di ka kumpleto o sinumpa ka pag wala kang anak
Si Jay pa sponsoran mo cuz apparently napaka dali lang daw maging magulang
You talk like as if family is defined by numbers. As if having kids is like having a car with upkeep. You don't "acquire" kids bc you're financially capable but rather you can compromise. Emotional and financial stability is a false guarantee of a good family that post-modernist society is trying to impose which fails my material family (They were able to raise their kids, including my mom, into a well-educated person bc they can "afford" and my maternal grandparents are not just financially able but also emotionally).
Wisdom is the most important.
Your point is valid but think about how many people in China and India are living way below the poverty line. When you have an overabundance of workers, businesses can get away with offering lower wages because of supply and demand.
Balance lang dapat. Let people be. Most of them will have kids and some will not. Ideally maintain lang dapat ang population na sustainable both sa economy and environment ^^
May mas malala pa diyan. No Income More Kids.
Lol kahit pobre may income. Papaano nila papakainin anak nila? Sa kakarampot na 4ps.
Alam mo kung anong mas malala? Yong pinag-aral ka tapos wala ka namang alam😅😅
@@Alpha7721 blessing daw. Pero child labor ang bagsak 😂
Hays. Kaninang aga noong papunta ako sa aking paaralan, may nakita akong homeless couples na merong limang anak (isa sa kanila ay sanggol pa). Nakaka depressing. Tapos meron pang mga t@nga kagaya ni Joy na dapat paramihin pa ang populasyon ng Pilipinas 😵💫
Keep up the good work Jay! You are one of the very few bright lights in PH podcast scene who resists pagan ideas masquerading as "progressive". Akala ng mga tao ngayon makalumang isipan ang Catholic moral and social teachings, ang di nila alam ang liberal ideas ay makalumang isipan din ng mga pagano. The family is the most important unit of a great society. The moment we prioritize pleasure and convenience is the moment our civilization declines.
We need more podcasters like you Jay who hold the line.
How is that girl spending 16k monthly on golf hahahaha
Anong masama sa pagiging DINK?
@@eryalmario5299 may masamang epekto ito sa ekonomiya kung marami ang maging DINKs. Nawa'y napanood niyo sana ang video until the end. Salamat po sa tanong na ito.
@@JayAruga I did watch it and I think your opinion has no basis in reality and in some cases can even be considered as out of touch and misconstrued kasi di lahat ng couples ay dual income with no kids.
The way you said that in the video - no children = aging population= bad is not our reality e ksi may iba't ibang paraan para hindi tayo magkaroon ng problema sa demographics natin and it's not just with young people having kids.
Hays obviously you're just trying to clickbait for deleting comments that would not give you more views. (summarizing it for others to save them 10 mins)
anyway, good luck with your campaign. I don't hate your ideology. Kids are essential to life but we don't enforce them to others
@@roochedigital4893 I'm not really enforcing it I'm making people think. If their main reason for not having kids is the economy, guess what, that decision is bad for the economy in the long run.
New subs here .. 101% agree reject DINK
My father was a pedicab driver (sidecar boy), my mother is a highly street smart woman. Then my father, unfortunately, died when I was 10 leaving 4 kids still studying, not 1 has finished school that time. My mother almost sold her soul to the devil just to make sure we live. When I was in college, my brother and sister had babies without finishing school. My mother had to carry the burden of raising grandkids because the father of my sister's kid was a dick. My brother on the other hand was able to finish a vocational course and started earning minimum wage, it got better, but it was never enough. Guess where we all lived? Yes, under one roof. I went through the final year of high school without electricity. Our roof had fist size holes, which meant that we had artificial waterfalls inside our unfurnished house. When I finished college, I was severely underpaid and yet overworked and overstressed. Things are getting better for us all, even for my mom. But it's still far from comfortable.
And now you have the audacity to tell us to have children in this godforsaken country where the only ones who actually get better lives are syndicate members, porn stars, those who are willing to make a fool of themselves on camera and those who are willing step on other people with fraudulent businesses. Not to mention, most of the politicians here sold their souls to the devil.
You want me to pass on the miseries I had, my detest in life, to another child? Just because you are doing fairly better in life?
Time to question the "Catholicity" of your content, Jay. Are you upholding the teachings of the church? Or are you blinded by your perspective.
Let me be clear. The teachings of the church does not change when it comes to family and that is well iterated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and JPII's Humanae Vitae, but let's face it, we are a third-world country. We are poor, not by choice.
Nice points! Salamat
Sobrang arte naman mag bigkas ng manila
Man Nil La
How bout to each their own?
Materialism is rampant in the comment section. DINK is self serving materialistic ideology... this kind of ideology will just lead to emptiness... mas mahirap buhay dati pero mas madami mag anak mga tao pero naka survive naman sila... pakulo lang ng mga anti natalist na biniblame ang population sa kahirapan... USA, china, south korea, japan and madaming mayaman na bansa nag s suffer na ngayon sa population decline... kaya madami na ring mayayaman na bansa ang tumatanggap ng immigrants na napakarami dahil doon sila bumabawi para mapunan yung pababa nilang population at work force... philippines birth replacement rate is on the decline also...
It's true people "survived" but how many of those "survivors" do you think can say they're actually happy and content with the state of their lives growing up and now? It may be true that population growth is good for the economy in the long run but we need security NOW, not 10 years from now. The point is, DINKs should be free to be DINKs without this criticism and being called "selfish". If you want to grow the population of this country single-handedly go ahead, mag-anak ka ng 12 but if others don't feel like doing so, don't crucify them. Also, isn't it also "self-serving" if you'd like to grow a family because you wouldn't want to feel "empty"?
Subukan mo muna mag anak ka ng 5 tapos sa low income at class D at E ka bago ka kumuda madali sayo dhil sana taas kana
@@LeonardCupat halatang na consume ka na ng materialism. Happiness is temporary and it requires a sustainability like consumerism (philosophical or material things). You can observe also in nature that "happiness" is not a fact of life but tragedy.
DINKs are selfish bc they can't compromise their own happiness for others (meaning a child). They just want to take all of their labor for themselves as a "drug" to deny the fact of life. They excuse themselves from tragedy by sustaining a consumerist lifestyle and having a child would compromise that. And they excuse themselves from having such belief by giving a sympathy to someone that doesn't even exist (the child they choose not to have).
@@baepedro Halatang na-consume ka naman ng bias. Why is it that the first reason people assume DINKs choose the lifestyle they choose is because they're selfish? And let me guess... when you think of DINKs, you imagine a couple that is earning P45k+ a month each don't you? Try thinking they are earning a third of that, then maybe you'd understand.
I want a kid for myself too and me and my partner wouldn't probably be DINKs but unlike you, I understand I'm in no position to shame those who choose to live that way.
@@LeonardCupat If you're DINKs and still earning 15k per month at least go to the city find a job in retail or manufacturing and earn at least 12k per head. That is if you got a real intention of having kids. You have to compromise. Take a risk. It is the reason why I said "they can't compromise for others". Surely you can't be a consumerist if you can only afford to pay for living.
It is not the bias that I am consuming, it is the logic.
What if di magakanak?
I did mention sa video na iba ang DINK sa gustong magka-baby, pero hindi magkaanak.
Those DINKS mostly are those cant have Kids for some reason..
What??? Dink ideology is now in the philippines? I only hear this in west topics.
Wow ung video ng magasawa. Super hedonistic.
@@reyvaks sadly, may DINKs na dito. Need to pray for the couple sa video.
The cost of living in the Philippines is high, and some would rather not have kids in this economy.
@@gonfreecs8640 would you agree on my 3rd point that in the long run, more Pinoys not having kids is also detrimental to the economy?
@@JayAruga if your only earning 630 a day in metro manila goodluck prang di mo sinama ung 50%+ na minimum wage earners sa pinas.. ako nga na 630 a day hirap tpos bread winner pa ako sa 5 magkakapatid tpos ako pa bumubuhay sa magulang ko>?? sa tingin mo makakapag anak pa ako
Kadiri yung DINKWAD sa video. Red Ollero for stand up comedy? Kahit libre yun, lugi ka pa rin eh. haha
Jay "Kulang sa" Aruga
Maaring kinulang nga yan sa Aruga kase namention niya hindi naman sila ganun ka kaclose ng tatay niya o sakto lang
Witty ka ba sa barangay n'yo?
@@josephmanuel272Comedian yan lods
Nakulangan ng rebuttal so insulto na lang kasi kulang ang brain cells
Maganda para sa Pilipinas ang low-birth rate, lol
JAY WALANG ARUGA SHOW
Remind ko lng kayo ndi masgastos ang pinoy in nature sa mga kapricho kya tumataas ang presyo ng basic need kc dun nka focus ang pera ng tao
"Hindi magastos sa kapricho" lol 'yong pamilyadong tao pwede pa pero dito sa pinagtatrabahuan kong factory naka-iphone mga minimum wage walang 10k below maliban sa bagong pasok tapos branded pa mga damit. Talo pa kami ng mga squatter naka aircon tapos may fiber connection.
JAY KULANG SA ARUGA SHOW 😅
E sa ayoko mag-anak. As if naman ikaw mag-aalaga pagakatapos ko tumae ng bata! 😒
Napaka out of touch mo naman sa sinabi mo tungkol sa pag pili ng pulitiko na may anak andami daming pulitiko diyan na may anak pero pulpol pero ano pa nga bang aasahan mo sa isang conservative diba? Ayos na yan na bumagsak ang bansa dahil kulang ang workers para magkaron naman tayo ng bagong sistema, pero kase nga conservative ka nakakulong kana sa makalumang pag iisip. Time will tell kung naging mabuting ama ka sa mga anak mo, kung makasalita ka kala mo lahat ng tao ay magiging mabuting mga magulang.
Ano pa nga bang maasahan namin sa woke na kagaya mo, diba? Lahat na lang ng uso sa West, gagayahin kaya sabog-sabog na ang moralidad natin sa bansa. Tapos kunwari concern ksa sa kinabukasan eh nihilist ka naman. Mas balanse naman mag-isip mga convervatives kesa sa mga woke na kain nang kain ng poopoo ng West.
Tignan mo lang baka yong pinagtatrabahuan mo ay pinapatakbo ng isang pamilya o baka. O siguro sa inyong pamilya kailangan magbotohan para malaman kung sino ang masusunod, makaluma na ang pamilya so kahit sanggol pwede nang magdesisyon sa lahat. O pati estado makaluma na rin ilang libong taon na ganiyan. Pati na rin logic baguhin mo na rin since bago pa ang panahon nila Plato ginagamit na yan. Isama mo na utak mo kasi ilang bilyon na rin na ganiyan ang design, palitan mo na rin para naman may masabi kang matinong arguments.
@@baepedro Okay na ho sana lolo kaso hinahanap ko din yung argument mo? Literal na nag yap ka lang at feeling may alam kana porket may mileage na yang edad mo po mano po!
Bat d k mag pasa ng batas na illigal and DINK yung 1 taon ng kasal pero walang anak at yung mga 1 o 3 bawal din dapat 5 o 15 anak pra masaya ikukulong yung magasawa walang anak
😂😭😭😭😭
Demanda mo mga couple n nag practice ng DINK kung ayaw mo stay away from then pavayaan m sila sa choice nila
Tignan mo ngayon need mong mqg youtube pra lng mabuhay m 3 mong anak
Simple lng yan kase nasa taas ka na nasa middle incomd k p may youtube k pa pero kung nasa low income ka at informal settler ka mapagsalita k p kaya tulad ng sinasabi mo ngayon?
Life here on earth is not about us. DINK is practical atheism. It is definitely not God’s plan and vision for mankind. It has been a recurring human folly to choose SELF over God’s will.
I'd love to save my finances for myself, thank you
Pabobo na talaga mg conservatives
Patalino na ba mga woke?
@@josephmanuel272 Uyyy may nahuli sa bitag ko.. Kung pawoke ako, gusto nyo matulog sa pansitan haha
@@piggy1398 uhmm... yeah.. typical wokie. Walang sense. :)
So kinatalino mo na yan?
@@baepedro so kinatalino nyo Ang pagiging marites sa mga couples na Wala namang pake sa inyo haha