Dean Radin: The Global Consciousness Project

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 окт 2024
  • Laboratory scientist Dean Radin describes an experiment testing the relationship between mind and matter. In this experiment, random number generators are used to test whether collective human attention corresponds to a change in the physical environment.

Комментарии • 332

  • @CommunistCookie
    @CommunistCookie 9 лет назад +194

    It would be interesting to know what would happen if everyone in the world prayed for one flower to grow faster watching a live feed of it's progress

    • @carlgreen8608
      @carlgreen8608 9 лет назад +17

      Oh man that'd be so easy to publicize.

    • @brianlink391
      @brianlink391 8 лет назад +13

      +Carl Green They have done something like that. Its been brought up in the documentary call "What the bleep do we know". They said - They have bought monks together to meditate in a room with positive thoughts and it deceased crime by some percentage. 10%? can't remember but it was a cool fact.

    • @tristanhoward9190
      @tristanhoward9190 7 лет назад

      CommunistCookie Prayer has been shown to be ineffective maybe a better experiment would be to try to make the flower grow.

    • @nicholaslindley1982
      @nicholaslindley1982 6 лет назад +23

      Thinking that prayer is ineffective has been shown to be ineffective.

    • @spaceedementia
      @spaceedementia 6 лет назад +5

      CommunistCookie if we could gwt everyone in the world to concentrate on something productive and peaceful like that, we wouldnt even be in this mess

  • @sarahknight6627
    @sarahknight6627 6 лет назад +29

    I swear the morning of 9/11/01 when I got on the school bus (I was in 8th grade at the time), I felt this eerie calmness in the air kinda like the calm before the storm. I just knew something would happen that day, maybe it was intuition, I don't know. But I didn't imagine it would be history in the making.

    • @alexriddles492
      @alexriddles492 3 года назад +2

      I have seen graphs of the EGG data from 9/11 and the change from random does start a few hours before the event.

    • @MeridianOfficial
      @MeridianOfficial 3 года назад +1

      Appeal to emotion

  • @GeetarAdam
    @GeetarAdam 8 лет назад +48

    Dude is hacking the Matrix, real-life!

    • @kajallison8896
      @kajallison8896 4 года назад +1

      GeetarAdam haha

    • @Felewin
      @Felewin 4 года назад +2

      You would also like Randonautica

    • @monicamir
      @monicamir 4 года назад +2

      He's hacking human brains for his experiments.
      They want to know how mind is connected to brain.
      They discovered the particle Psy/J at CERN in 1976 and i guess it's not a particle at all.
      They defined a Algebra at CERN called Supersymmetry.
      There's a video made by CERN called Simmetry.
      Those people are crossbreeding between human and Rhesus monkeys.
      They want to become humans. They put lots of humans to work for them. Some not knowing , some unwillingly.
      Drugs are part of their business.
      Those people have no soul. They have a digital model of their minds called silhouette.
      The psychotronic generators are people they kill in their experiments.
      They are seek.
      Buhr is hell or fire in Sanskrit.
      They use the Sanskrit language in their researches.
      They made me have nightmares about 911 since 1978 or 1979. They have stolen my journal of this time.
      I had many nightmares with 911. It's synthetic dreams. They have produced those dreams.
      They produce events. Large scale events for their psychotronic generators.
      They are into noetics, occult , etc
      They are satanists.

    • @GeetarAdam
      @GeetarAdam 4 года назад +2

      Mônica Miranda Indeed. Modern day alchemists. But rather than investigating how to turn lead into gold, they want to know how matter begets mind. Of course, they’ve got it bass-ackwards. Matter proceeds from mind. All matter in the universe was willed into existence by the mind of Yahweh.

  • @TheLisa-Al-Gaib
    @TheLisa-Al-Gaib 4 года назад +32

    I’m furious that this project has been de-funded! This research is SO important and needs to continue. (This turned out to be wrong--see edits below)

    • @amyp.575
      @amyp.575 3 года назад

      What?!?!

    • @TheLisa-Al-Gaib
      @TheLisa-Al-Gaib 3 года назад +2

      @@amyp.575 I actually had a quick online chat with Dr. Radin and he told me that the project was defunded. I didn't get any more details than that unfortunately, but I am very disappointed. That was extremely important research in my opinion.

    • @liberationwasalie2982
      @liberationwasalie2982 3 года назад

      Gematria effect news

    • @TheLisa-Al-Gaib
      @TheLisa-Al-Gaib 3 года назад +10

      Actually, I have a correction. The Global Consciousness Project is up and running with current reports available online.
      noosphere.princeton.edu/
      So I don’t know what happened exactly. I was live chatting with Dr Radin at his official site awhile back trying to get data from the 2016 election. I don’t know if I was tricked or if new funding appeared in the interim. Either way, I wanted to correct my statement and not spread incorrect information. Have a great day!!💕

  • @gyromurphy
    @gyromurphy 5 лет назад +8

    The fact that this doesn't have millions of views is disturbing to me.

    • @kristiejackson3240
      @kristiejackson3240 8 месяцев назад

      Bc we all heard the same thing right?!

    • @longboardwoddy
      @longboardwoddy 2 месяца назад

      for majortiy of people this is too high, they still live in their psychological trap with a strong EGO

    • @moppa90
      @moppa90 2 месяца назад

      Also the elites don't want us to know. that's the main reason I guess

  • @davidcraigthor
    @davidcraigthor 10 лет назад +22

    For maximum benefit, it is essential for those manipulating things (all of us), to be happy. Happiness is a crucial factor in determining whether those changes are beneficial or detrimental. For someone with a lot of "influence" torturing & tormenting them could mean disaster for everyone.

    • @majji8604
      @majji8604 5 лет назад

      Fuck trump though

    • @tiddlecast
      @tiddlecast 3 года назад

      Well I love that idea. I think he alluded that the phenomenon’s causation is still under investigation.

  • @dharmacharinipasadanandi7110
    @dharmacharinipasadanandi7110 4 года назад +5

    Wondering what random number generators are doing during Covid... I was captivated by "what the bleep" film this guy spoke in, with other scientists. Intriguing.

  • @jayumble8390
    @jayumble8390 2 года назад +4

    This is fantastic, thank you!!! There is a collective consciousness that is indeed totally real and these REG's prove it...period. We just need to keep studying this. Once this concept is accepted around the world, the responsibility is on us, as a collective people, to make the difference. This is so deep and points to a different reality for generations to come.

  • @FortYeah
    @FortYeah 13 лет назад +1

    No matter how quantic or not this is, Radin talks here about the data he collected. So to all of you who don't agree that this is a quantic phenomenon, fine.
    But Radin's experience surely shakes the materialistic theory of consciousness...

  • @Paddyllfixit
    @Paddyllfixit 11 лет назад +4

    This vid only gives a mere overview of the project. Have you read any of Dean's books or checked out his research? This is only a tiny snippet of a much larger and more complex issue.

  • @bilbobaggins3333
    @bilbobaggins3333 3 года назад +1

    I thoroughly enjoyed listening in on this discussion. On the part of the poster of this content there are far too many advertisements embedded. There were between 10 &15 planted into this presentation. It’s disruptive and impedes the absorption of the content.

  • @ff-1971
    @ff-1971 Год назад +1

    Is it possible to be every conscious being? To experience all lives linearly but at the same time simultaneously and outside of time

  • @someguyinsantaclara
    @someguyinsantaclara 3 года назад +1

    Double slit experiment being affected by the problem of observation. Perhaps it's not so much the physical observation but the focus of attention on a set of wave functions that compose a real world event that cause the output of the waves functions to be manipulated.

  • @fremmed1
    @fremmed1 14 лет назад +1

    @Dewillough This raises the question: Does our thoughts matter or are we just matter....? Yes, our bodies are matter, but thoughts decides if we live in love or fear. This (and many other) experiences proves that our attitude/thoughts matter in a unified way. Witch means that we should care about what we do cause what we do to another we also do to ourself. Its about responsibility to create a more loving world.

  • @robertwalker3500
    @robertwalker3500 10 лет назад +2

    I have written a book called Remember the Rainbow: An Instinctive Sense for Grasping the nature of things. In the book, I write about one of my experiences that caused me to raised the very same questions with regard to "intention and attention." I found myself having the ability to manifest objects into existence. To hear Dean Radin speak to this question via scientific experimentation tells me he is far more superior, intellectually, than he himself may realize. While I have been gifted in knowing, that is, by means of time travel, he has the ability to comprehend scientific data through experimentation. What he doesn't know is that his desire for discovering answers to his most puzzling question are found in the complexities of time travel. I'm currently writing a second edition that will bring my perspective, a new light, of understanding of how consciousness works in the paradigm of time to answer some of these kinds of questions [04/20/2014].

  • @terrapin52
    @terrapin52 14 лет назад +1

    This is a good example of academics falsely trying to find cause and effect relationships where they don't exist. So many countless doctoral theses written for the same reason never advance human knowledge because they are "reaching" for something that isn't there. If he'd publish his findings, I'm sure you'd find an error coefficient which is perfectly plausible and could not be attributed to anything other than normal variance.

  • @amyleigh7660
    @amyleigh7660 3 года назад +1

    Six days before 911, I was burdened with excruciating sensations of utter doom. These feelings would grab me unexpectedly and throughout these days, I’d told a total of 7 people - neighbors, friends and family about it. No matter how hard I tried, I could not pinpoint it. Late at night, on September 10th, 2001, it all disappeared. And of course the next day, horror. I didn’t understand until that moment and at the time, I was an extreme skeptic.
    After that, no more.

    • @WHDRWN
      @WHDRWN 2 года назад

      emotion grab

  • @Markisagoodboy
    @Markisagoodboy 16 лет назад +1

    When someone is reported missing on the television news, or there is a war, perhaps the news should adopt a biased approach now and present it in such as way that the viewers are encouraged to send love and safety to the victims - instead of have everyone think the worst and give it more negative attention.

  • @82ghost
    @82ghost 16 лет назад +1

    What I'm eluding to is he said BEFORE 9/11 there was a peak as well. As I stated there wasn't any global focus on that event before it happened. If so why wasn't their any "global focus" on all the other horrific events that have happened well before and well after 9/11? I get what he's saying but I still believed some of his findings are tainted.

  • @temporaryexistence1974
    @temporaryexistence1974 3 года назад +1

    On the day of 9/11 I was 15 and I am from central Europe. I came back from school that day and suddenly a thought came to my mind. Turn on CNN, maybe there is some breaking news. So I did and CNN was like, there was an accident and a plane just crashed into WTC. Man, I watched it all and it changed my life. A truthseeker was born.

    • @negus3530
      @negus3530 6 месяцев назад +1

      There is no CNN in central europe

    • @temporaryexistence1974
      @temporaryexistence1974 6 месяцев назад

      w@@negus3530 yes, as well as no flush toilets, you backwater retard.

  • @rocco7755
    @rocco7755 7 лет назад +5

    This is the power they don't want you to understand.

  • @SAlexanderHardison
    @SAlexanderHardison 12 лет назад +1

    Fair enough; I will agree with that. The larger effects for what we're talking about are often more difficult to demonstrate adequately though.
    If even one of the many poltergeist cases, for example, is a genuine example of large scale psi at work, then it's been demonstrated; I tend to think that there are many genuine cases of notable phenomena occurring that we can't explain. Thanks for the response!

  • @alexanderstanza
    @alexanderstanza 5 лет назад +1

    Can we use the machine to predict the winning soccer team in a world cup? Example: Germany vs France, deploy machines in Germany and in France and see how the deviation different between the two countries. Who knows the winning team will show positive deviation and the losing one will show negative deviation.

  • @Dewillo344
    @Dewillo344 14 лет назад +1

    This theory appears ridiculous yet plausible and understandable. However, what are the practical implications of a global consciousness interconnected with all of global matter? I can't think of any.

  • @da-hn
    @da-hn 14 лет назад +1

    Is there any video / text with discussion on this topic?

  • @cfrancisco74
    @cfrancisco74 14 лет назад +1

    That's analyzing data & establishing a link between the data and an event, but it's all after the fact. How much of a diffrence is there between the randomness & order during the event? Does it go from totally random to 1,2,3,4,5,6,7...? He never says. He just says that there is a clear change. How so?

  • @qorilla
    @qorilla 10 лет назад +26

    I'm manipulating matter right now with my mind. I'm pulling my finger muscles by just thinking of moving them with my mind.

    • @harishmohan1
      @harishmohan1 3 года назад +2

      Me too ☺

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 года назад

      Now try manipulating matter outside of your body with just your mind.

  • @Mrpjm200
    @Mrpjm200 14 лет назад +2

    This work needs to be taken seriously by the world and academia! At least decades have been spent working on this research. Double blind experiments reveal that this is fact.

  • @seyoumeye
    @seyoumeye 15 лет назад +1

    What about before the death of Michael Jackson? Has any mental coherence affected randomness?

  • @anarelle
    @anarelle 10 месяцев назад +1

    This is definitely what Jacobo Grinberg was talking about with his "lattice" and syntergic theory.

  • @galacticswan
    @galacticswan 11 лет назад +1

    Not at all. this means that each time that there is a event that have consequences on a large scale for humans, we notice that random generators have a peak of unrandomness that starts a few hours/days before the event, and ends a few hours/days after.
    From that, studies have to be done to begin to understand this phenomenon : for now we don't know much about what's "really" happening.

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 14 лет назад +1

    @Vernonpaddy Regardless if they are negligible or not is beside the point. They are there. The unexplained parts of science can be ignores? Science doesn't ignore what it can not explain. It charges at the things it cannot explain. Whether there is practical applications are not are beside the point. Science is the search for knowledge.

  • @jessepoulin
    @jessepoulin 14 лет назад +4

    I wonder if the experimenter's expectation of the effect of events on random number generation is the driving factor of this experiment. Though it's still astonishing that they might affect the machine with their mind...

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 года назад

      Exactly, its confirmation bias. The human mind is built to find the patterns it wants to see. There's 0 evidence you can affect anything outside your body with your mind

  • @AstroSquid
    @AstroSquid 4 года назад +3

    will Benford's law help an individual know if they are being honest in their projection on the random numbers?

  • @SAlexanderHardison
    @SAlexanderHardison 11 лет назад +1

    I'm not speaking of the GCP specifically, but rather psi research in general, specifically the Ganzfeld. You can test numerous hypotheses at once and see which one works. If the same hypothesis is found to fit the data across the board, that hypothesis might be justified. If we claim that anomalous communication occurs (i.e. mind to mind communication), finding supporting data that fits the concept and not others (i.e. sensory leakage, etc), we can presume AC is a reasonable explanation.

  • @elfman5150
    @elfman5150 15 лет назад +3

    Wow this is extremely interesting stuff! I'll be sure to look it up; thanks for your suggestion! It is amazing how different "true" reality (though I suppose I must use the word "true" very loosely) is from what the majority of people think it to be. And from what you have said, regarding prerecorded data, how consciousness can effect past events and data possibly. Truly fascinating stuff - better than science fiction, because it is real!

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 года назад

      Reality is what's around you. There's no evidence otherwise. This is all confirmation bias garbage

  • @KnowL-oo5po
    @KnowL-oo5po Год назад +1

    give this man all the resources he needs

  • @laelwerner5441
    @laelwerner5441 3 года назад +1

    Any scientific papers on this?

  • @tjmac7
    @tjmac7 16 лет назад +1

    Electronic number generators. Maybe the link is between consciousness and electronics. Im sure the prana and chi proponents would love this angle.

  • @Paddyllfixit
    @Paddyllfixit 11 лет назад +2

    what are you talking about? Did you watch the same video? There is absolutely no data-dredging, the results speak for itself. The "randomness" becomes coherent during world events with peoples attention being focused. It is what it is! There is no misinterpretation other than perhaps some other cause being responsible for the change in the RNGs which is highly unlikely as no other factors are involved. Did you not hear Dean state that the odds against it being chance are 1000000/1?

  • @Candyliz2003
    @Candyliz2003 14 лет назад +1

    @vman456
    1. What are they (studies) and where can they be found?
    2. Being a skeptic has nothing to do with bigotry or arrogance.
    3. Didn't he fail with James Randi? Or did he not accept the challenge (like all but one psychic)?

  • @djdavidj5531
    @djdavidj5531 3 года назад +1

    Would be interesting so to see the same experiments done using quantum computers as "random" number generators. I wonder if the entanglement factor is changed...

  • @SAlexanderHardison
    @SAlexanderHardison 12 лет назад +1

    I know what you mean. :p And I agree, wholeheartedly! Most people simply dismiss the study of the claimed phenomena, because of its nature and potential implications. The evidence shouldn't be ignored -rather we should seek to evaluate the quality of that evidence.

  • @messianicrogue
    @messianicrogue 14 лет назад +1

    Obviously there is a world wide psychic connection, that just happens to tap into TV events simultaneously around the world, hours before events happen, it is so obvious.
    'Events would occur that we couldn't predict' But you should be able to predict some form of major event hours before now this gear is kicking off.

  • @RayneMa
    @RayneMa Год назад +1

    Yes there is a direct link between consciousness and matter around you. But you will only notice it if you have extremely high consciousness at the time but you will only be the one that experiences it as no one else will be there ready to measure your consciousness when it is being experienced. I do not think you can directly measure it. But it is there. I will be interested in the results that happen a day before the global tsunamis in 2004.

  • @mihaitusnea504
    @mihaitusnea504 9 лет назад +2

    Has this experiment been tried at a music concert? I would be curious if the same behaviour occurs.

    • @jancko995
      @jancko995 8 лет назад +1

      +Mihai Tusnea they tried it at a sport afair, and nothing hapens.
      but I would sugest u take a look at Roger Nelson. He's too is a part of these experiments.

  • @gschnuuget
    @gschnuuget 7 лет назад +1

    ok. Why not extending the experiment, using all the million computers of volunteers to generate more random data.
    Why not feeding back the random values on a website so that everybody can see the next arriving drama ?

    • @jutjubow
      @jutjubow 6 лет назад

      You won't see what exactly it will be though.

  • @PinballDave72
    @PinballDave72 9 лет назад +1

    A noticeable byproduct of personal battles between Love of Life vs. Fear of Change, or something to that effect. :-) ☆ ♡

  • @tiddlecast
    @tiddlecast 3 года назад +2

    Here we are with this magnificent power and we’re praying for 1’s and 0’s 😅😉

  • @Balla4life3
    @Balla4life3 12 лет назад +8

    This guy is my new hero!

  • @Mrpjm200
    @Mrpjm200 14 лет назад +1

    @Dewillough - All great discoveries in science begin with people not being able to see the practical significance. When people begin to understand the implications of Dean Radin's research there will be significant changes in our society.

  • @avidclip
    @avidclip 14 лет назад

    Two notable quotes from the brilliant German physicist, Max Planck, relevant to the topic and to some of the comments: 1. "I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness." 2. "Science advances one funeral at a time." This latter quote has proven itself true way too many times., and I think will do so in Radin's case too.

  • @EchadLevShtim
    @EchadLevShtim 13 лет назад +2

    @shizzleman8 Biochemistry in generational trauma outlines memory processes which are classified in folders outlined with emotional tags. The whole imprint of observed thought is an emotional response from the frontal lobe(creativity) or Amygdalla (fear/anger). These images are burnt into recognition with increased emotional intensity. Otherwise we only hold less emotional memory in short term in most cases, as they draw less interest to the observer. Synchronicity shock of pre-memory, deja vue

  • @redbeakman
    @redbeakman 10 лет назад +10

    The Force.

  • @archdeaconj
    @archdeaconj 14 лет назад +3

    @MaBu888 Well hang on a minute. You're saying the there is a 5th dimention (and maybe more) which is all possible events - all the roads we didn't go down, as well as the one we did. Also you're saying all these possible events EXIST somewhere, in some way (it's not just metaphorical). You're also saying, I think, that Radin's (and Helmut's) tape has 5th dimensional data on it (many possibilities) that is collapsed into lower dimentional data by the consciousness of the observer. Yes?

  • @Xerock
    @Xerock 15 лет назад +1

    0:00 - 1:35 - After loads of data wishing for heads and tails works. None of this data is shown.
    1:36 - 2:31 - Who did these tests of randomness? Where were they held? Where is the data?
    2:32 - 3:51 - "We can infer that there is mental coherence" Translation: there is no measurable link between wishing and manipulation of data.
    3:52 - 5:56 - "significant deviation towards order" Translation: Nothing we can measure beyond common, everyday apophenia.

  • @somuchinfo
    @somuchinfo 8 лет назад +6

    Before 9 11, during and after... how could something that runs randomly change before anyone is even aware that the event is about to happen? This suggests that something or someone else was focusing in on the event before it actually began, not random human beings but something else had turned its energy toward that specific event and possibly others.

    • @spaceedementia
      @spaceedementia 6 лет назад +1

      joseph wall while i do believe 9/11 was a definite inside job, i think this precognition could be achieved by something like the inertia of a cosmic event. This event changed everything in our realm. It had to have some _major_ things (shifts in consciousness) leading up to it... whether 19 hijackers with box cutters carried it out or not

    • @reneeboley
      @reneeboley 6 лет назад

      Because our hearts have been shown to know when something bad is going to happen before it happens. Time is man created.

  • @archdeaconj
    @archdeaconj 14 лет назад +1

    @MaBu888 What do you mean 'if the tapes have 5d'? The tapes are just ordinary tapes, like any other except that the data on them is unobserved. It has recorded data generated by the RNG but in the absence of any observer. The data exists in a state of quantum indeterminacy until it is collapsed by an observer. What would be acceptable to you as determining that the tapes 'have 5d'?

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 15 лет назад +1

    I dont understand. Pls explain

  • @CW4RUNNER
    @CW4RUNNER 14 лет назад +1

    This is very much like 'the secret'. Think positive and you'll be rewarded with great things.

  • @DrewDienno
    @DrewDienno 4 года назад +1

    I wonder if the scientists who ran the 1950s acid studies on those housewives were trying to learn about this global consciousness thing, seeing if the drug effects were linked to getting in touch with the universal community, or if the two had nothing to do with each other.

  • @Wstreak91
    @Wstreak91 6 лет назад +4

    Listen to 2:33 - 3:16 1000x !!!! IF YOU GET IT CONGRATS!!

  • @knightxc
    @knightxc 14 лет назад

    There have been plenty of other tests that seem to support some inter-connectedness bewtween everything, not a god, just a connection. The double slit experiment, entanglement theory, and chaos theory all seem to suggest a higher conscious or at least suggests that there is some hidden reality that we cannot observe. Yes, maybe this test has a variable unaccounted for but that does not mean we should discard the theory all together.

  • @jeremybronson7
    @jeremybronson7 13 лет назад +1

    This is very exciting... Is it me or Does anyoneelse think that there may be a relation between the results of testing being done at LHC in Switzerland and Global Conciousness Project..
    1- Some particles may travel faster than light..
    2- Information may travel faster than light..
    3- Some events may be foreseen before it happen..
    4- Is the cause and effect principle becoming history-- at a certain level??
    These i would love to know... :))

  • @derekfish7768
    @derekfish7768 4 года назад +2

    This absolutely fascinating!

  • @Mrpjm200
    @Mrpjm200 14 лет назад +1

    @phookadude - You need to check out the earlier work that was done at Princeton Uni. They performed studies on individual volunteers who's attention was focussed on an REG (e.g. they were trying to consciously influence the outcome). This later research using EGGs is like a scaled up version of the earlier research.

  • @archdeaconj
    @archdeaconj 14 лет назад +1

    @MaBu888 Can we establish what you mean by the 5th dimension? The 4th dimension is time, of course (the other three being the spatial dimensions of the everyday world). This is standard physics. Are you postulating a 5th dimension which is a realm of possibilities?

  • @davidthemann
    @davidthemann 15 лет назад +1

    I don't think randomness can be explained with the current scientific sterotypes and normes.
    The classical scientific method is to fond of it's numbers and scales to be able to explain things that exceed these culturally set "rules".
    Dean Radin is one of few visionaries who seeks to ascend beyond this trivial dabbling.

  • @pauldrake1858
    @pauldrake1858 7 лет назад +3

    I used to do will power exercises from a book by professor Alexander Power of the Mind and you get yourself into a state of apperception (self awareness)and you focus on a small cloud and you can make the cloud disappear. I have done this a number of times. I think the global consciousness movement need to look at this. Clouds and vapour could be a good medium to work with.

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 года назад +2

      Confirmation bias.

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 года назад +1

      Cognitive dissonance.

  • @revolutiongames2004
    @revolutiongames2004 15 лет назад +1

    By definition random is random. Scientific method is a well established technique for observing phenomena dating back over 1000 years. You cannot talk about proof without first analyzing data. You might as well consider this a religion as it cannot be approached scientifically. That is in no way a degradation of religion, all it means is that you cannot approach them the same way.
    How can one begin to talk about proof of causality without proper data?

  • @michaeldunworth2194
    @michaeldunworth2194 2 года назад +1

    Electricity which our bodies run on, are all thinking of the same thing, which would be like drawing a similar pathway of electricity that fires through your synapses. Given that humans are all similar enough, it would be electricity flowing through everyone’s brain thinking of the same thing (thinking of different things, or feeling different emotions will have electricity flowing through them depending on the emotion. So if we’re all happy, then it’s likely that we will all think of a happy thought, and thus light up areas of the brain which represent happiness (be it dopamine or whatever the specific scientific ingredient is)… This means that the energy signature, will be similar at a large scale (eg an event like 9-11 where the larger majority of the measured group, is experiencing the same energy signature (emotion). This would then have a huge pull on the way energy is flowing through the random number generators. If everyone is feeling a similar emotion, and our brains light up similar areas when we feel that emotion, then at scale, this effects an invisible magnetic field, which will change the current flow of energy through the wires, and into the random number generators.

    • @roberthamell7141
      @roberthamell7141 Месяц назад +1

      To know this can save our world or even better. Advance it. We can have world peace!

  • @brianlink391
    @brianlink391 8 лет назад +2

    Love it, thanks. Great video!

  • @BrunoCoelho
    @BrunoCoelho 10 лет назад +1

    Controlling a coin with the mind? Have we been able to falsify this, yet or how is this supported by the scientific method?

    • @commodoor646
      @commodoor646 9 лет назад +1

      Bruno Coelho I'd be interested to know how often their random number generators produce non-randomn data sets in the absence of what they refer to as global consciousness *_attending_* events. In other words, if the spikes in non-random data occur in the absence of global events, maybe these spikes can be explained by pure chance.

  • @richardfitzwel7518
    @richardfitzwel7518 9 лет назад +1

    I have Identified a form of physic ability that every person uses and doesn't know, or didn't know how to prove till now. Anyone can do it and the effect can be seen and recorded with 2 cameras, it is repeatable, non deniable, and can be randomized, distance don't matter.
    I'm positive with the advances in energy field sensors and the right equipment the energy or information used by this form of telepathy could be recorded. Experiment clearly shows with the naked eye, that information was transferred by ESP. There is 100% no denying that telepathy is real. Too bad I don't have money or access to any of that equipment.....yet

    • @Nasko86
      @Nasko86 9 лет назад +2

      You can prove it using a critical mass of people that repeats your experiment and confirms it. It's still not a scientific proof, but a good step to it when enough people just agree on it's proof. Then it becomes something common and accepted. Even if when do't truly understand it! Like for example TIME, or big Bang maybe?
      Please tell me how to do the experiment. and I will confirm it if it works for me.
      I would let some friends repeat it and here it goes like a chain true the internet.
      I hope you get what I mean. (I am not a native English speaker.)

  • @revolutiongames2004
    @revolutiongames2004 15 лет назад +1

    how does one determine whether randomness goes down?
    i ask because, like scientists should, i would like to repeat the experiment. how does one define a decrease in randomness?

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 года назад

      Exactly why its a garbage study.
      Randomness is a lack of pattern. So if you see more patterns, you can reasonably claim there is less randomness. But if you look for more patterns, you will see more patterns. (The #1 job of the human mind is to recognize the patterns it wants to see). This is all obviously confirmation bias. But if you wanted to recreate it, look for patterns in the numbers. Eg 0000 0000 0000 0000 is less random than 1001 1100 1010 0010

  • @EchadLevShtim
    @EchadLevShtim 13 лет назад +2

    I wouldnt sum up Dean Radins career on RNG alone, he's done a few doozies. But nothing was more profound than Time Reversed Human Experience in Precognitive studies, where EEG brainscans monitor brainwave function during response of emotional stimuli, This test has been practiced at campuses globally as scaring & arousing patients shows significant brain activity. RNG is no more validating than the old card guessing trials. For the simple reason of synchronicity & lack of stimuli.

  • @Fangornmmc
    @Fangornmmc 14 лет назад

    Everything comes together. I mean, you have that series called "The Secret" which comes down to: you can make your own reality. You also have that quantum mechanical effect that the molecules of water form up beatifully when exposed to the written word love and becoma a ugly mess when exposed to the written words hate and anger. This is yet another proof that our minds have a huge impact on the world. The only difference with other expiriments is that this one is scientific

  • @metaRising
    @metaRising 13 лет назад +1

    I've just posted a vido response to this video that people interested in the GCP may find interesting. -thanks

  • @serg8004
    @serg8004 11 лет назад +1

    does he somewhere else show the rogher data?

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 15 лет назад +1

    and your response is to call him "crack pot" so now you're even. Insults doesn't deal with claims either way. My question to you: is what if his data is correct? Because he doesn't do a full presentation in an interview does not mean it is flawed. Lets just saw this man did the work, got the results, and is being honest about them. Can you be objective for a moment?

  • @Jeevanm71
    @Jeevanm71 3 года назад +1

    What the physical systems being triggered by?

  • @bowenstudios
    @bowenstudios 14 лет назад +1

    @1234stives I do know a bit about it. Quantum physics in no way supports such a claim. I'm assuming you're referring to entanglement - in which two particles can be 'contected' to each other althought they may be physcially far from each other. When entangled one of the particles can effect the other partical instantly over a large distance. ONLY entangled particles effect each other in such a way. NOT all particles are entangled, in fact almost none are. (continued...)

  • @JayJayAbels
    @JayJayAbels 12 лет назад +1

    Extremely skeptical. Where can I read the data and see the evidence? I don't mind people with agendas attempting to prove that they're correct but I'd like to see the results laid out in a precise fashion. Scientists will too.

  • @galacticswan
    @galacticswan 11 лет назад

    Of course, but what I was trying to say beyond this triviality is that we naturally accept to use different tools for different practicle problems, while we find strange to accept different way of thinking for different levels of conception of our environment. And that IMO only comes from the fact that we can fool ourselves much longer vis-à-vis the field of application of a theory, than vis-à-vis the one of a material tool (sorry for my poor english).

  • @bxbank
    @bxbank 3 года назад +1

    This just sounds like it is proving where attention is being directed, not before it happened. Just showing when it is happening in real time. There is no perception being proved here.

  • @hibarahman7593
    @hibarahman7593 7 лет назад +1

    What quantifies orderedness in the RNG?? Like is there a pattern 0000011111, 01010101??

  • @Wstreak91
    @Wstreak91 5 лет назад +4

    "The system that should be behaving randomly are no more behaving random"; if this doesn't inspirs you to know more about YOU I do not know what will!

    • @davemwangi05
      @davemwangi05 4 года назад +1

      I'm trying so hard to look for the link between the current global covid pandemic and this global consciousness project but there's nothing anywhere. Even in their website Jeez. if you find anything hit me upz. People have forgotten this and they're caught up in fear now LOL.

    • @liberationwasalie2982
      @liberationwasalie2982 4 года назад

      @@davemwangi05 are you alive

    • @davemwangi05
      @davemwangi05 4 года назад

      @@liberationwasalie2982 I've just been taken to a morgue, they've labelled me a covid death.

  • @nekusaken
    @nekusaken 5 месяцев назад +1

    The Government Is The Firmament, The Holy Spirit is Gravity, dying is reaching a higher hierarchy. If death is ordered then there's order afterwards. I'm just rambling because I don't want to explain

    • @nekusaken
      @nekusaken 5 месяцев назад +1

      Dark Matter is sound, Space is Room, the word of God is a placeholder word, nomenclature for nature

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 14 лет назад +1

    @ikvsabre This is an interview cut into a 10min clip. You want details? And how would you know he has not submitted his work for peer review from this clip? Search Dean Radin speaks at google here on youtube or on my page. You will find names, places, and all the other information you need. Now the question is are you brave enough to leave your bias at the door and deal wit the data honestly? Probably not. You skeptics are really like the religious. I've done this dance many times.

  • @huni54
    @huni54 9 лет назад

    we could also try a youtube experiment with this.. since a lot of people watched it we could try to focus real hard on a thought and see if the random number generator is disturbed by it or not.

    • @Nasko86
      @Nasko86 9 лет назад

      For this you need a big mass of people to pay attention to it. Since only 77 000 people saw this.
      How big is the number you think of the people actually interested in this video/information. Since it is from 2008. If you are interested in the subject or at least openhanded as I pretend to be you could tap by accident on it.
      Or maybe people don't care. Couse they are scared, that if we have missed this, there could be so much more?
      I am not critical. I just say, that the problem is not technology, the problem are we. Of course we can. But we just don't! People don't want to know. Some of was do. But here we are. 77 000 peope + some maybe 100 000 who have not found this video yet. Now who is going to organize them? For free, cause anything else would be appearing the same as all this "I will tell you a secret which will make you endlessly happy, rich, or sexy, only for 99$ for a cd, or book".
      I would be happy to find out a way to change that. How to make people curious ? How to make them want to know?
      We need an Idea here. Big bang kind of Idea.

  • @Pendulum_Swings
    @Pendulum_Swings 13 лет назад +1

    @bowenstudios ever heard of quantum entanglement?

  • @nzdrone
    @nzdrone 6 лет назад +1

    I think this is the secret of professional gamblers. Have you ever wondered how professional gamblers seem to keep winning more than they lose while everybody else loses more than they win? I think it's because they do it all the time, day after day. After a while the constant attention and intention to winning starts to favor the odds to their advantage.

  • @Wretbornify
    @Wretbornify 12 лет назад +1

    @nemirn You've just shown that Science is a belief-system just as strong as religion.

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 14 лет назад +1

    @Candyliz2003 How would you know the details of the experiments from a 10min interview clip? You may be psychic or maybe you are a remote viewer. You seem to know things that no one could know from the information presented here. Wow. A real life remote viewer!

  • @paulflute
    @paulflute 5 лет назад +1

    he didn't mention the experimenter effect..

  • @stauffap
    @stauffap 13 лет назад +1

    @IceAges14Aces You're right and that's why i always read about the discussion on wikipedia and the changes that were made. Wikipedia is great because you can always find both sides of the coin. But come on, just look at the experiment and the results...sometimes the random number generator reacted before and sometimes after and event...and sometimes not at all. And sometimes the RNG gets highly unproable results without anything happening. What should that be proving? unconnnectedness imho

  • @stephenm6137
    @stephenm6137 4 года назад +1

    Mind blowing literally.

  • @theconsciousmovement9669
    @theconsciousmovement9669 4 года назад +1

    sorry for sealing your views, I had to re-post this

  • @Nowitzki25
    @Nowitzki25 15 лет назад

    collective consciousness is like sunyata in Buddhism which means emptiness; or for better words emptiness of consciousness. Because Buddha taught that we are all one in a void state/place. "Emptiness is form and form is emptiness" Not a Buddhist just found it interesting.

  • @Fangornmmc
    @Fangornmmc 14 лет назад +1

    @Fangornmmc
    ups. The quantum mechanical effect was also scientific. Almost forgot that.