Great video! I grew up in a family where we recognized pre-cognitive dreams as a fact of life. I experienced a few in my teenage years which were well documented as the dreams were shared with 3rd parties in advance of the actual events occurring. I was long frustrated with the dismissive attitude of physics to these experiences and I agree that non-locality gives us a doorway to understand the physics of these experiences.
@Mean While I had precog dreams between ages 10-18 or so. For some reason, I lost it as I grew older. There are older people in my family who retained it into adulthood.
Non-locality doesn't really exist. Our consciousness exists in any locality it chooses to, if the observer knows how to choose or is open to experiencing other localities without physically doing so.
Regarding non-locality and the objection that brain cells are way bigger than subatomic particles, we really don’t know how big a thought is, we only understand the generators and receptors of the thought. We have no idea what a thought actually is physically, or whether it is non-physical (whatever that means).
It's Dr Dean Radin. PhD. It's funny how his title is lost because he researches an unpopular field. Love this channel for talking to him, not saying it's true but his math shows statistical improvements above the norm. Meaning there is something extra happening during these studies above normal statistical variables. Interesting research.
Many colleges still offer curriculum in the field of parapsychology (Dr. Peter Venkman is one of the original Ghostbusters - has doctorates in both psychology and parapsychology). One can acquire a doctorate in divinity as well- but that doesn’t prove there is a God. It merely means the person has studied the field.
@@DeanHorak omg your wisdom is overpowering. Thank you for your mocking, with this new wisdom I too can mock others. I always wonder are you an American jerk or a bot just looking for trouble.
There's a great fear in these that mock. Psi suggests a possible afterlife - an afterlife creates fear of a possible judgement that many don't like the idea of.
One thing that repeatedly happens to me is that out of the blue I start thinking about people who I know but haven't seen for a long while. Then, lo and behold, I will see them very soon after that.
This is a very common experience for me as well, or they’ll call me or something like that. In addition, it happens with ideas and concepts: one example I wrote down was talking about Wu Tang clan with a buddy who had never heard of it and then a couple of hours later a person with a Wu Tang clan shirt walks into the locker room I was in right when a Wu Tang clan song starts playing. This has happened with even more obscure topics and ideas then showing up on t shirts, etc. The likelihood these experiences are coincidence, I have them weekly, is probably hundreds of billions to one.
I think the keyword here is connection. If you need an operative principle, resonance. My own personal experience supports the concept but I am by no means an expert. The information just pops in independently of internal narratives and linear/analytical thinking. It comes from what I call ‘KNOWHERE’ pun intended. Perhaps there are brain states (frequencies) involved. Perhaps not. To use a musical principle often talked about, it’s the space between the notes.
Remote seeing, implying perhaps some entanglement, is one thing. But it seems vastly more inexplicable when it comes to precognition. I have witnessed some amazing examples that defy explanation.
Fundamental to reality seems to be the quality of a part and a whole simultaneously. This is why the mere act of observation changes reality from a probability to a particle. Many scientists seem unable or unwilling to relinquish a material paradigm. The implications of quantum mechanics are immense. Trying isolate science from metaphysics doesn't really work.
Lots of respect to the interviewee, for his calm, reasoned responses. Not so much to Robert who is very closed to these ideas and who would, I'm sure, resist at gunpoint anything more than a casual effort to peruse the evidence.
This is a very illuminating discussion about the ESP. I think the professor has nailed it. The non-local nature of the quantum physics and the observer effect must be indeed the two central principles on which the ESP resides. It must be added that although the quantum realm is normally the microscopic world but quantum effects have also been observed macroscopically such as the topological quantum numbers (TKNN quantum numbers) that govern the macroscopic conductivity in variants of quantum hall effect, superconductivity, and superfluidity. So quantum effects must be able to manifest themselves in biology as well.
@@maxwellsimoes238 *"Absolutely this video are place where emerges anti Science ,mis information challatan with good phich proposes. Absurd this Channel vídeo."* ... Where else do you suggest people should go for better information?
Better than quantum entanglement, a Closer ESP biological model -Thinking in terms of fractals- could be the synaptic space between two brain cells sending one thought to another. I’m not 100% sure but I think the space has something to do with helping a thought along between two separate systems . It also helps if you think of each neuron as its own system
ESP is basically just an instance of Flow. When your mind is able to reach out and follow your senses. "What card?" Ink Distribution. Alterations. What can be done vs what is advertised.
Another great video from Robert Kuhn's channel Closer To Truth. Our understanding of ESP and other mind-related phenomena will one day be at a greater level of understanding. I think whenever we think, we talk. We form the words in our heads, but also with our vocal chords. A machine to detect thoughts should be possible.
I feel like my thoughts are not mine. I don't make them. They come to me from somewhere. I keep getting these "original" ideas only to find out others had them before me.
Are YOU thought real in brains youself? If Not YOU certain has not good health mental it is neurose ir esquizofrenia. Keep out reason is it open door to crazy
@@Hankiemooody Basically I think the gentleman was asking are YOU thought real in brains youself? If Not YOU certain has not good health mental, it is neurose ir esquizofrenia - Keep out reason is it open door to crazy.
The answer you're looking for is in the realm of the subconscious, and its no coincidence that science knows very little of it. I am not saying its supernatural but rather the brain is an extraordinary powerful computer that might require thousands of years to understand if not longer.
Why was Robert pushing the argument that it needs a theory to be valid. I was disappointed that Robert was unable to clear his mind and accept there were solid experiments being conducted in a rigorous manner, following scientific best practice, with repeatable results, which were worthy of further investigation. Dean Radin nailed it when he said Observation is what matters, and theories come later. Most of science came from observations that did not fit expectations, which eventually led to new theories which we accept today as obvious, but they were radical, even insulting, when first proposed. ESP could be yet another of those. Robert struggles to be objective in this interview. We all have bad days, I suppose.
Do smaller effects have greater importance in quantum mechanics, where fields and wave functions are smaller scale? Also, does statistical analysis have more relevance for phenomenon related to quantum fields, which themselves are statistical in nature with probabilities?
Large-scale quantum effects are very rare because generally they cancel out and the wave function collapses once you have interactions between particles. This is why this is generally not a factor in the macro world.
At times, randomly, I know about a minute, when thinking of a person, someone I know like a friend, family or colleague, then I meet them, they are their in person.
Can conscious awareness and subjective emotion be considered sensory perception, even if somewhat different from touch, taste, smell, sound and sight? Or is conscious awareness and subjective emotion somehow of greater degree or kind than usual senses?
I find it troubling that the most convincing evidence comes from meta analyses. If real, ESP is such an important effect that people must have tried to demonstrate it in single studies in which the effect size has been can be taken into account in determining the required number of subjects. I would be very interested in knowing the most convincing single ESP study. If the statistics is carried out in a sound way, it would indeed change my mind. However, the reason why such studies might be difficult to find, might be the same as why no-one has even claimed the 1M dollars from James Randi, which is that no-one has been able to demonstrate paranormal abilities under controlled circumstances. Anyway, love this channel!
@@KpxUrz5745 A sample of one subject, yes, but you could have as many trials as needed to detect the effect, however small. If someone really can sense extra-sensory, then she should be able to demonstrate it in this way, but no-one ever has.
You make an assumption about the mental ability that is not valid and that is that the ability ''has to be'' strong or weak or medium sized and that's simply a question that requires a empirical answer and is not a theoretical question. No body would deny the fact that people can hit a baseball with a bat because its not a 100%. The best batters can get a hit rate of 30%, a person who never held a bat in his life would probably have a hit rate of less then 1%, a small effect but a real one.Again the effect does not need to manifest in any particular way in order to be considered real. It is after the fact that we develop theories to explain the facts.
My form of telepathy makes most sense it's just talking mentally. I don't know about mind reading or hypnoses even. To me mind reading is not really communicating, seeing what others are seeing or knowing/feeling what's in someones else's mind. Thought transmission is treu telepathy, but even that comes in forms. Telepathy along side physics and music is also a universal language. It's the language everybody understands, but not everybody speaks
If consciousness is foundational and ESP just describes the interconnectedness of consciousness amongst those who possess it, I have to question how familial attacks and murders occur so frequently with no forewarning, even when they are planned well in advance. You would think some sense of the impending situation would be passed on to the target of the action through this shared consciousness by the planner/perpetrator. This one point doesn't negate the hypothesis, but it is something to consider.
There is a video here on youtube, that was about the tests they ran in a laboratory setting using a random number generator specifically designed for the experiment. They went into detail about the methods and final statistical analysis of the results, taking into account all the variables.
@@buddyrichable1 But a RUclips video is not a peer reviewed accredited scientific journal. Unless your research, results and findings are being scrutinized by scientific peers knowledgeable in the field -- who's sole purpose is to find even the tiniest flaws or inaccuracies in your methods, data collection, analysis or interpretation of results -- then your research is not of the highest caliber necessary to be accepted by the scientific community in general. It is because of such high standards that the science we have today works. There are journals who's worth and reputation rests on not publishing data or results later found to be wrong or inaccurate. For example, the journal, _Nature,_ is one of these. You look at a paper in _Nature_ and you know it's scientific method and interpretation of results are going to be airtight.
@@longcastle4863 I find it remarkable that anyone who asserts the value of peer review research are often themselves guilty of not doing their own research. For example, a simple Google engine search on Dean Radin's official website will direct you to over 100 academic articles appearing in peer reviewed journals ranging from The Foundation of Physics and Physics Essays to Psychological Bulletin, Psychology of Consciousness and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Because that was so easy to find, I'm led to believe that your question is a rhetorical one premised on the assumption that none of this can actually be real. It's pretty easy to spot a real question as opposed to the ones that are actually statements. On a related topic, Michael Persinger-the inventor of the God helmet - insists that psi is real despite the fact he used to be a materialist sceptic and Michael Shermer's go-to source whenever he tried to debunk this phenomenon. Persinger also has a lot of peer review on the neurological physics on this topic but it's a bit camaflaged in order to get financing for this kind of research. See the popular video, No More Secrets, a RUclips video, for an overview of his work. Frankly, none of that actually convinces me that any of this is real. It's my personal experiences that mostly convince me. If you notice, Dean added that creative types typically showed higher effect sizes in psi than the average person or someone who leans more "right-brained" or analytical. Though I love science and studied it at university, I'm also a professional illustrator/artist. So I'm a mixed bag who always has this inner dialogue going on where on the one hand I keep having these experiences and then there's the sceptic in me that likes to test those experiences via sceptical inquiry. Hope that helps
Its funny how there is STILL a rather strong vibe afoot "as if" its simply a given that Radin doesn't do solid science & that the evidence for PSI(in whatever of its various forms & especially collectively) isn't FAR beyond what is typically acceptable as statistically significant for "understood" sciences/experimental results. The several decades of work done at Princeton alone(the home of Einstein mind you) should have at least raised some eyebrows. But of course, everyone involved MUST have just been mistaken in ALL instances. People even go so far as to really believe in an infinite # of imaginary universes for which there is ZERO empirical evidence mind you. Its ANYTHING but that perhaps its just our current preferred worldviews/narratives/metaphysics(mostly materialism/physical realism, a philosophy mind you) that needs updating. There is little question that such behaviors do indeed occur in nature & they are fundamentally no more or less baffling than Quantum weirdness itself, which is widely accepted. But thats OK since its only for "small things"🤔. Theres NO way attention/intention/mind/the C-word/experience(the ONLY thing we've ever had AND the only thing that we can be certain of btw) could possibly "fit" into the picture, since its "ONLY" a meaningless epi-phenomenon. We(our mindsets at large) will be laughed at eventually. If I was a betting man, I'd bet a few precious fingers on it.
Everyone has experienced ESP at some point in there lives I’ve had dreams that have shown me certain situations but until it happens I then remember the dream I’ve also had dreamt of lottery numbers only once but couldn’t remember the last two numbers it came in that weekend I was so convinced I told my work colleague he had a punt too.
About 20 yrs ago I dreamt my football team won 2-0 and I'm still waiting 😀😀seriously next day they won 2-0, strange lititle things happen in life that can't be explained physically.👍
Einstein has a lot to answer to for calling quantum entanglement 'Spooky action at a distance'. Now anybody with a claim to some paranormal gift can hold the 'non-locality' card up in the hope that it makes their claim sound more plausible.
Love these videos! I had to laugh out loud watching this one because, as he was speaking about shared experiences, I immediately knew the next words out of his mouth which concerned the Miracle at Fatima. How did I know? Maybe it's something like artificial intelligence which was created, at the outset, for software which predicts the next word you're going to type. The intersubjectivity that he is speaking about has some basis in reality. We all have the same notions of time and space and various concepts, but inter-subjectivity does not translate into shared thinking. Although we all know the rules of the game, it does not mean I know the move a player is about to make...
To the "ant" music comes from the radio. To the human the music comes from the radio station. To the artist the music comes from imagination. Does imagination effect the physical world 🤔 yes, of course!
Evolution has found ways to use everything from chemistry to EM fields, vibration, and even quantum mechanics to give biological systems sensory perceptions. It would "make sense" to assume that we're not fully aware of what we're aware of, or how we're aware of it. When was the last time you sensed the Earth's EM field? You might be surprised.
It just takes a little more openness on the part of physicist to get off their high horse to accept observations that are normal everyday human experience. Example of these scientist include Sean carol, Roger , Einstein himself and others. This guy appears very honest but read Nature article on how Dean was put down.
The position of most paranormal researchers is that they don’t need evidence- for some reason their claims should not be subjected to the same scrutiny as other claims.
There is a video on youtube about the experiments that he is referring to. They used a random number generator specifically designed for the experiments and collected data over many trials. They detailed all of their findings in the video. I’m sure it wouldn’t be hard to find.
@@pandawandas , , They have no evidence. Testimonials are not evidence. Evidence is acquired by producing repeatable, testable results. After decades (if not centuries) of trying to show paranormal is real, evidence has yet to be produced. You can whine and cry and claim paranormal researchers don’t have to follow the scientific method - that somehow they are exempt from having such constraints, but I’m sorry - that isn’t science- that’s pseudoscience. Maybe know what you’re talking about before looking foolish.
Only squizogrenic shows he proposes are real left behind reason in this way Nothing worthless Science. He has serious health problems in other words he are so crazy challatan.
Absolutely correct. And No. All the modern science can do is separate, divide, thus we have discrimination and can define based on contrasts of things and attributes, and this realm is the only place they can ponder with their form of methodology -- most of them today disregard metaphysics even. Acknowledging the One they do not care to engage. From what I learn for example: gravity, sound, energy, light, magnetism are all the same thing just different modalities, but they only seek to understand the parts and not the whole, therefore they cannot properly even understand the parts. Regarding this video topic, they mostly exclude God because they cannot touch, fathom, measure or imagine the One; ESP is excluded because of lack of evidence. We know ESP is genuine, all the ancients were aware, all our scriptures are of.
Nice video. Very scientific point of view. Perhaps a layman’s point of view should be offered. Like examples of cases. Identical twins and their results.
I'm glad there are people out there who make a career of looking into things like this. What a profound change in just about everything we understand about consciousness and thought if this was true. But it really looks like it is not and this probably should be relegated to the fringe of study, as it has been. There's just enough there that if you wanted to take a leap of faith and believe that you could muster some science up to look at it, but just barely. I think his explanation that since quantum physics allows for nonlocality that this someone allows for esp or possibly even explains it is just far-fetched and really a poor argument.
I think we dont even try ... once , a few years ago i started to write down the dreams i had each night. After a month the dreams were much much stronger, true experiences. Then i stopped because well life is always demanding too much attention but i wonder if i could have reached lucid dreaming and maybe deeper perceptions. I am not sure if ESP exists or not (i am more inclined not) but i am pretty sure that we dont practice enough and basically arent studied seriously anyway.
I have experienced telepathy twice. Of course I cannot prove anything. But I wouldnt be surprised to see some scientific breakthroughs in this area in the near future.
NEVER telepathy are place Science experiente in this sense when telepathy rejected reason Science falied . Telepathy is place where challatan show absurd concept.
wrote a thesis on parapsychology and found no verification for ESP. Every message needs a medium. None yet found for ESP. So far every non-physical phenomenon has had a physical substrait. Giving something a label does not give it any credence or provide explanatory power
I would like to hear more about what quantum biology has to offer on this subject. Quantum tunneling of electrons is thought to occur in chlorophyll. In neurons it is thought to occur in organelles called micro tubules. And let us hear more about the QM/QFT mechanisms where complex numbers and even quaternions figure in. Do unlikely events occur within micro tubules given enough iterations? Could ESP be a modifier of complex weighting factors and ultimately a higher probability of seemingly "magical" things happening in the brain? How apparent are these effects when we try to observe them? Do they vanish under direct observation but would manifest with less direct observation such as statistical analysis?
The data this guy is talking about has been heavily questioned and many say that there's no statistically significance to show what he says it shows. It's just very easy for small unseen methodological problems with experiments or the meta-analysis to mess up your final conclusions. Also, note that what he's talking about isnt even scientific because he has no theory at all to describe what he's talking about. And of course, if you have no theoretical support for your claims, then it's pretty much impossible to falsify it. This is nothing but pseudoscience. He just starts to talk about things like entanglement because he thinks it will lend his claims validity, to make people think that at least there's SOME basis in physics for what he's claiming. But, there's really NO reason to think that quantum effects like these have any effect on the macro level to the extent that ESP would require. The only believable thing he said is that it's all nonsense.
First, you missed the point of the video. it's just a conversation. Second, if you listened to it, it is even pointed out that the data is controversial. Third, Dr. Radin admits in the video they are looking for the evidence of a connection between the quantum and physical (in the context of looking for evidence of ESP) because they don't have it yet. Personally, I don't think ESP exists. However, discussing it and having scientists explore it may turn up evidence one day, maybe not. That's what's so great about science, it constantly explores things and tries to make sense of a fantastic universe.
@@DeanHorak Ok? So why did we invest billions in search of dark matter yet have 0 evidence in 30 years for it? Heck ESP at least have some statistical evidence. Is dark matter a religion?
@@janeferess411 , ESP has been debunked over and over again. The claimed statistics have been shown to be biased by researchers or faulty controls. Dark matter is a hypothesis - no scientists claim it is factual - it’s a possibility, so we do experiments to rule it in or rule it out.
@@FireHorse489 I'd take a Winnebago! But, I wasn't first.. So, I guess he wins a lifetime of closer to truth shorts here on RUclips.. Not a bad thing if you ask me.. this channel is awesome.. all their videos so such a low view count.. when it should be in the top 10.. honestly I support any comment or interaction on this channel.. the world needs more of this type of conversations.. it's a joyride for the mind.. love it
I had a vision of someone smashing Dean Radin's knees with a baseball bat in the future. Presuming this was an actual vision rather than simply wishful thinking, I would advise Dean to be careful out there. I am a bokor and rarely are my visions wrong.
🐟 06. CONSCIOUSNESS/AWARENESS: Consciousness means “that which knows” or “the state of being aware”, from the Latin prefix “con” (with), the stem “scire” (to know) and the suffix “osus” (characterized by). There is BOTH a localized knowing and a Universal Awareness, as explicated in the following paragraphs. Higher species of animal life have sufficient cognitive ability to KNOW themselves and their environment, at least to a measurable degree. Just where consciousness objectively begins in the animal kingdom is a matter of contention but, judging purely by ethological means, it probably starts with vertebrates (at least the higher-order birds and fishes). Those metazoans which are evolutionarily lower than vertebrates do not possess much, if any, semblance of intellect, necessary for true knowledge, but operate purely by reflexive instincts. For instance, an insect or amphibian does not consciously decide to seek food but does so according to its base instincts, directed by its idiosyncratic genetic code. Even when a cockroach flees from danger, it is not experiencing the same kind of thoughts or feelings a human or other mammal would experience. The brain is merely a conduit or TRANSDUCER of Universal Consciousness (i.e. Brahman), explaining why the more intelligent the animal, the more it can understand its own existence (or at least be aware of more of its environment - just see how amazingly-complex dolphin and whale behaviour can be, compared with other aquatic species), and the reason why it is asserted that a truly enlightened human must possess a far higher level of intelligence than the average person. The processing unit of a supercomputer must be far larger, more complex and more powerful than the processor in a pocket calculator. Therefore, it seems logical to conclude that the scale of discrete (localized) consciousness is dependent on the animal's brain capacity. See Chapter 17 to understand the distinction between enlightenment and mere awakening. Three STATES of awareness are experienced by humans and possibly all other species of mammals: the waking state (“jāgrata”, in Sanskrit), dreaming (“svapna”, in Sanskrit), and deep-sleep (“suṣupti”, in Sanskrit). Beyond these three temporal states is the fourth “state” (“turīya” or “caturīya”, in Sanskrit). That is the unconditioned, eternal “state”, which underlies the other three. The waking state is the LEAST real (that is to say the least permanent, or to put it another way, the farthest from the Necessary Ground of Existence, as explained towards the end of this chapter). The dream state is closer to our eternal nature, whilst dreamless deep-sleep is much more analogous to The Universal Self (“brahman”), as it is imbued with peace. Rather than being an absence of awareness, deep-sleep is an awareness of absence (that is, the absence of phenomenal, sensual experiences). So, in actual fact, the fourth state is not a state, but the Unconditioned Ground of Being, or to put it simply, YOU, the real self/Self, or Existence-Awareness-Peace (“sacchidānanda”, in Sanskrit). Perhaps the main purpose of dreams is so that we can understand that the waking-state is practically indistinguishable to the dream-state, and thereby come to see the ILLUSION of this ephemeral world. Both our waking-state experiences and our dream-state experiences occur solely within the mental faculties (refer to Chapter 04 for an elucidation of this phenomenon). If somebody in one of your dreams were to ask your dream-state character if the dream was real, you (playing the part of that character) would most likely say, “yes, of course this is real!” Similarly, if someone were to ask your waking-state character if this world is real, you would almost undoubtedly respond in kind. An apt analogy for Universal Consciousness is the manner in which electricity powers a variety of appliances and gadgets, according to the use and COMPLEXITY of the said device. Electricity powers a washing machine in a very simple manner, to drive a large spindle for laundering clothes. However, the very same electrical power may be used to operate a computer to manifest an astonishing range of outputs, such as playing audiovisual tracks, communication tasks, and performing extremely advanced mathematical computations, depending on the computer's software and hardware. The more advanced/complex the device, the more complex its manifestation of the same electricity. Using the aforementioned computer analogy: the brain is COMPARATIVELY equivalent to the computer hardware, deoxyribonucleic acid akin to the operating system working in conjunction with the memory, the intellect is equivalent to the processing unit, individuated consciousness is analogous to the software programme, whilst Universal Awareness is likened to the electricity which enlivens the entire computer system. A person who is comatosed has lost any semblance of local consciousness, yet is being kept alive by the presence of Universal Consciousness. The fact that many persons report out-of-body experiences, where consciousness departs from the gross body, may be evidence for the above. So, then, following-on from the assertion made in the third paragraph, one could complain: “That's not fair - why can only a genius be enlightened?” (as defined in Chapter 17). The answer is: first of all, as stated above, every species of animal has its own level of intelligence on a wide-ranging scale. Therefore, a pig or a dog could (if possible) ask: “That's unfair - why can only a human being be enlightened?” Secondly, it is INDEED a fact that life is unfair, because there is no “tit for tat” law of action and reaction, even if many supposedly-great religious preceptors have stated so. They said so because they were preaching to wicked miscreants who refused to quit their evil ways, and needed to be chastized in a forceful manner. It is not possible to speak gentle words to a rabid dog to prevent it from biting you. There is evidence of Consciousness being a universal field, in SAVANT SYNDROME, a condition in which someone with significant mental disabilities demonstrate certain abilities far in excess of the norm, such as superhuman rapid mathematical calculation, mind-reading, blind-seeing, or astounding musical aptitude. Such behaviour suggests that there is a universal field (possibly in holographic form) from which one can access information. Even simple artistic inspiration could be attributed to this phenomenon. The great British singer-songwriter, Sir James Paul McCartney, one day woke with the complete tune of the song, “Yesterday”, in his mind, after hearing it in a dream. American composer, Paul Simon, had a similar experience when the chorus of his sublime masterpiece, “Bridge Over Troubled Water”, simply popped into his head. Cont...
In recent years, the term “CONSCIOUSNESS” has been used in esoteric spiritual circles (usually capitalized) to refer to a far more Homogeneous Consciousness (“puruṣa”, in Sanskrit), due to the fact that the English language doesn’t include a single word denoting the Universal Ground of Being (for instance “Brahman”, “Tao”, in other tongues). The word “Awareness” (capitalized) is arguably a more apposite term for this concept. The typical person believes that the apparatus which knows the external world is his mind (via the five senses), but more perceptive individuals understand that the mind itself is cognizable by the intellect. Wise souls recognize that the sense of self (the pseudo-ego) is the perceiver of their intellects, whereas awakened persons have realized that the true self/Self is the witness of ALL these temporal phenomena. The true self is synonymous with Consciousness, or with Infinite Awareness, or the Undifferentiated Unified Field (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit). The dialectic exercise in the following three paragraphs should help one to understand the nature of the fundamental conscious observer, that is, the ULTIMATE observer of all phenomena (i.e. the subject/Subject, which is the authentic self, as opposed to material objects): If one were to ask you whether you are the same person or individual you were at birth (or even at conception), you would probably respond in the affirmative. So, then, what PRECISELY is it about you which has remained constant since conception? In other words, what is the self-identity you had as an infant, which is the present “you”? It cannot be any part of your body or mind, since none of the atoms or molecules in your zygote body are extant, and “you” certainly did not possess a mind at conception. If you are reasonably intelligent, you may claim that your genome is the same now as it was then. However, it has recently been scientifically demonstrated that genetic code can (and usually does) change throughout an individual’s lifetime. Furthermore, nobody actively conceives of their essential nature being a bunch of genes! More intelligent souls would probably counter thus: “The thing which stays the same from my birth to the present time is my sense of self.” This too, is fallacious, since the sense of self does not emerge until at least a couple of years after birth. An infant has no ideation of itself as an individual actor. You may then say “I was a (male/female) human being” but that doesn’t specify any PARTICULAR human (you, yourself). So, then, what EXACTLY is it which remains “you” from conception till death? That is the “I am” which precedes any artificial sense of self. In other words, rather than saying “I am a man/woman/human/king/pilot/etc.”, simply the impersonal sense of “I am”. That is the true self, which is the Universal Self. Therefore, your essential nature is Cosmic Consciousness, usually called “God” by theists (see also Chapter 10). The Tao (The Reality [lit. The Way, The Path, or The Road]) which can be expressed in language is not the REAL Tao. All concepts are, by nature, relative, and at most, can merely point to the Absolute. That explains why some branches of theology use the apophatic method of discerning The Infinite (“neti neti”, [not this, not that], in Sanskrit). Also known in Latin as “via negativa” or “via negationis” theology, this philosophical approach to discovering the essential nature of Reality, gradually negates each description about Ultimate Reality, but not Reality Itself. Ultimate Reality (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit [from “bṛh” - lit. “Expansion”, in English]) alone is real - “real” in the sense that it is the never-mutable substratum of ALL existence. The wisest of the philosophers of ancient India distinguished the “real” from the “unreal” (“sat/asat”, in Sanskrit) by whether or not the “thing“ was eternal or ephemeral (cf. Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1:3:28, Bhagavad-gītā 2:16, et altri). Gross material objects (such as one's own body) and subtle material objects (such as thoughts) are always changing, and therefore not “real”. REALITY is clearly seen by those self-realized persons who have experienced spiritual awakenings (which occur either spontaneously, or after a gradual process over many months or years), yet only intellectually understood by those who have merely studied spiritual topics (that is, those who have practiced one of the four systems of religion described in Chapter 16, but have yet to awaken to their essential nature). “If you remain as you are now, you are in the wakeful state. This is abolished in the dream state. The dream state disappears, when you are in deep sleep. The three states come and go, but you are always there. Your real state, that of Consciousness itself, continues to exist always and forever and it is the only Reality.” ************* “The ego is the identified consciousness. When the impersonal Consciousness identifies itself with the personal organism, the ego arises.” ************* “The only true meditation is the constant impersonal witnessing of all that takes place in one’s life as mere movements in the universal Consciousness.” ************* “Consciousness must first be there, before anything else can BE. All inquiry of the seeker of truth, must therefore, relate to this consciousness, this sense of conscious presence, which as such, has no personal reference to any individual.” ************* “Insofar as you keep watching the mind and discover yourself as its witness, nothing else can project itself on the screen of consciousness. This is so, because two things cannot occupy the attention, at the same moment.Therefore, delve within and find out where thoughts arise. Seek the source of all thought and acquire the Self-knowledge, which is the awakening of Truth.” ************* “Just as the difference between the space in a pot and the space outside it disappears when the pot is demolished, so also does duality disappear when it is realized that the difference between the individual consciousness and the Universal Consciousness does not in fact exist.” ************* “All there is, is consciousness. That is the Source from which the manifestation has come. ...And the mind is merely a reflection of that Consciousness.” ************* “All there is, is Consciousness, not aware of Itself in Its noumenal Subjectivity, but perceived by Itself as phenomenal manifestation in Its objective expression. If this is understood in depth, there is nothing more to be understood.” Ramesh S. Balsekar, Indian Spiritual Teacher. “As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clearheaded science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about the atoms this much: There is no matter as such! All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Spirit. This Spirit is the matrix of all matter.” ************* “I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.” Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck, German Theoretical Physicist.
But any definition of Consciousness is Self-Defined since no one knows what it is Absolutely. It may be something that does not exist at all. Its like someone says is there Unicorn or Big Foot. These are invented terms
@@1stPrinciples455 by that reasoning it could be argued that anything anyone has ever encountered at any time, material or not, might not actually exist, including this very comment that I write and you read. Incidentally all "terms"are essentially "invented".
You wrote a term paper, and left out the detail that AI, will never have, and human intelligence, rarely has. Wisdom. What McCartney, and Simon have, is the supernatural, equivalent to charisma. Outside the understanding of science.
![Ice On My Teeth - ATEEZ エイティーズ 에이티즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 241115](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c-n92OgbbwA/mqdefault.jpg)
Great video! I grew up in a family where we recognized pre-cognitive dreams as a fact of life. I experienced a few in my teenage years which were well documented as the dreams were shared with 3rd parties in advance of the actual events occurring. I was long frustrated with the dismissive attitude of physics to these experiences and I agree that non-locality gives us a doorway to understand the physics of these experiences.
@Mean While I had precog dreams between ages 10-18 or so. For some reason, I lost it as I grew older. There are older people in my family who retained it into adulthood.
Non-locality doesn't really exist. Our consciousness exists in any locality it chooses to, if the observer knows how to choose or is open to experiencing other localities without physically doing so.
Regarding non-locality and the objection that brain cells are way bigger than subatomic particles, we really don’t know how big a thought is, we only understand the generators and receptors of the thought. We have no idea what a thought actually is physically, or whether it is non-physical (whatever that means).
It's Dr Dean Radin. PhD. It's funny how his title is lost because he researches an unpopular field. Love this channel for talking to him, not saying it's true but his math shows statistical improvements above the norm. Meaning there is something extra happening during these studies above normal statistical variables. Interesting research.
I feel tho like this guy may be a doctor in the sense that Doctor Dre or Doctor J are doctors
@@ransakreject5221 I love Dr. Dre, but he didn't get a PhD. Accept maybe in funky beats. Lack of respect for his education is the point of my post. ✌️
Many colleges still offer curriculum in the field of parapsychology (Dr. Peter Venkman is one of the original Ghostbusters - has doctorates in both psychology and parapsychology). One can acquire a doctorate in divinity as well- but that doesn’t prove there is a God. It merely means the person has studied the field.
@@DeanHorak omg your wisdom is overpowering. Thank you for your mocking, with this new wisdom I too can mock others. I always wonder are you an American jerk or a bot just looking for trouble.
There's a great fear in these that mock. Psi suggests a possible afterlife - an afterlife creates fear of a possible judgement that many don't like the idea of.
One thing that repeatedly happens to me is that out of the blue I start thinking about people who I know but haven't seen for a long while. Then, lo and behold, I will see them very soon after that.
That one is probably the most common esp event we all somehow experience
This is a very common experience for me as well, or they’ll call me or something like that. In addition, it happens with ideas and concepts: one example I wrote down was talking about Wu Tang clan with a buddy who had never heard of it and then a couple of hours later a person with a Wu Tang clan shirt walks into the locker room I was in right when a Wu Tang clan song starts playing. This has happened with even more obscure topics and ideas then showing up on t shirts, etc. The likelihood these experiences are coincidence, I have them weekly, is probably hundreds of billions to one.
I think the keyword here is connection. If you need an operative principle, resonance. My own personal experience supports the concept but I am by no means an expert. The information just pops in independently of internal narratives and linear/analytical thinking. It comes from what I call ‘KNOWHERE’ pun intended.
Perhaps there are brain states (frequencies) involved. Perhaps not. To use a musical principle often talked about, it’s the space between the notes.
Had several esp experiences in my life. Can’t produce anything on demand but when it happens it’s happens. Usually when I’m relaxed in a passive mood.
I had a feeling this video was going to show up today!
I knew you were going to say that!
I knew that you was going to say that you knew he was going to say that.👍
Remote seeing, implying perhaps some entanglement, is one thing. But it seems vastly more inexplicable when it comes to precognition. I have witnessed some amazing examples that defy explanation.
Fundamental to reality seems to be the quality of a part and a whole simultaneously. This is why the mere act of observation changes reality from a probability to a particle. Many scientists seem unable or unwilling to relinquish a material paradigm. The implications of quantum mechanics are immense. Trying isolate science from metaphysics doesn't really work.
Lots of respect to the interviewee, for his calm, reasoned responses. Not so much to Robert who is very closed to these ideas and who would, I'm sure, resist at gunpoint anything more than a casual effort to peruse the evidence.
Dean Radin is one smart man. More people should should listen to him.
Absolutely.
This is a very illuminating discussion about the ESP. I think the professor has nailed it. The non-local nature of the quantum physics and the observer effect must be indeed the two central principles on which the ESP resides. It must be added that although the quantum realm is normally the microscopic world but quantum effects have also been observed macroscopically such as the topological quantum numbers (TKNN quantum numbers) that govern the macroscopic conductivity in variants of quantum hall effect, superconductivity, and superfluidity. So quantum effects must be able to manifest themselves in biology as well.
I like how this channel explores unpopular opinions and hosts speakers with radically different views. Thanks 🙏
I absolutely love this channel!
Absolutely this video are place where emerges anti Science ,mis information challatan with good phich proposes. Absurd this Channel vídeo.
@@maxwellsimoes238 *"Absolutely this video are place where emerges anti Science ,mis information challatan with good phich proposes. Absurd this Channel vídeo."*
... Where else do you suggest people should go for better information?
Better than quantum entanglement, a Closer ESP biological model -Thinking in terms of fractals- could be the synaptic space between two brain cells sending one thought to another. I’m not 100% sure but I think the space has something to do with helping a thought along between two separate systems . It also helps if you think of each neuron as its own system
A better question is, does ESPN make sense?
I too, aspire to become a practicing Meta-Physicist.
ESP is basically just an instance of Flow.
When your mind is able to reach out and follow your senses.
"What card?" Ink Distribution. Alterations.
What can be done vs what is advertised.
Another great video from Robert Kuhn's channel Closer To Truth. Our understanding of ESP and other mind-related phenomena will one day be at a greater level of understanding. I think whenever we think, we talk. We form the words in our heads, but also with our vocal chords. A machine to detect thoughts should be possible.
I feel like my thoughts are not mine. I don't make them. They come to me from somewhere. I keep getting these "original" ideas only to find out others had them before me.
Are YOU thought real in brains youself? If Not YOU certain has not good health mental it is neurose ir esquizofrenia. Keep out reason is it open door to crazy
@@maxwellsimoes238 What?
@@Hankiemooody Basically I think the gentleman was asking are YOU thought real in brains youself? If Not YOU certain has not good health mental, it is neurose ir esquizofrenia -
Keep out reason is it open door to crazy.
@@Interspirituality are you the same person typing word salad?
@@Hankiemooody nope just tryna help
The answer you're looking for is in the realm of the subconscious, and its no coincidence that science knows very little of it.
I am not saying its supernatural but rather the brain is an extraordinary powerful computer that might require thousands of years to understand if not longer.
Why was Robert pushing the argument that it needs a theory to be valid. I was disappointed that Robert was unable to clear his mind and accept there were solid experiments being conducted in a rigorous manner, following scientific best practice, with repeatable results, which were worthy of further investigation. Dean Radin nailed it when he said Observation is what matters, and theories come later. Most of science came from observations that did not fit expectations, which eventually led to new theories which we accept today as obvious, but they were radical, even insulting, when first proposed. ESP could be yet another of those. Robert struggles to be objective in this interview. We all have bad days, I suppose.
Do smaller effects have greater importance in quantum mechanics, where fields and wave functions are smaller scale? Also, does statistical analysis have more relevance for phenomenon related to quantum fields, which themselves are statistical in nature with probabilities?
Large-scale quantum effects are very rare because generally they cancel out and the wave function collapses once you have interactions between particles. This is why this is generally not a factor in the macro world.
Robert is so nervous talking about ESP as if he's afraid to have his ego displaced by what he considers an upstart science.
Best comment!!😄
Love the talks in these videos, I watched the Sheldrake ones years ago and they were thought-provoking
ESP is difficult to prove since very few people can calm their mind to the level where mind can sense directly without sense organs.
At times, randomly, I know about a minute, when thinking of a person, someone I know like a friend, family or colleague, then I meet them, they are their in person.
Can conscious awareness and subjective emotion be considered sensory perception, even if somewhat different from touch, taste, smell, sound and sight? Or is conscious awareness and subjective emotion somehow of greater degree or kind than usual senses?
I find it troubling that the most convincing evidence comes from meta analyses. If real, ESP is such an important effect that people must have tried to demonstrate it in single studies in which the effect size has been can be taken into account in determining the required number of subjects. I would be very interested in knowing the most convincing single ESP study. If the statistics is carried out in a sound way, it would indeed change my mind. However, the reason why such studies might be difficult to find, might be the same as why no-one has even claimed the 1M dollars from James Randi, which is that no-one has been able to demonstrate paranormal abilities under controlled circumstances. Anyway, love this channel!
He explained that it is a small but measurable effect. But Randi's tests required definitive results on a sampling of one.
@@KpxUrz5745 A sample of one subject, yes, but you could have as many trials as needed to detect the effect, however small. If someone really can sense extra-sensory, then she should be able to demonstrate it in this way, but no-one ever has.
You make an assumption about the mental ability that is not valid and that is that the ability ''has to be'' strong or weak or medium sized and that's simply a question that requires a empirical answer and is not a theoretical question. No body would deny the fact that people can hit a baseball with a bat because its not a 100%. The best batters can get a hit rate of 30%, a person who never held a bat in his life would probably have a hit rate of less then 1%, a small effect but a real one.Again the effect does not need to manifest in any particular way in order to be considered real. It is after the fact that we develop theories to explain the facts.
My form of telepathy makes most sense it's just talking mentally. I don't know about mind reading or hypnoses even. To me mind reading is not really communicating, seeing what others are seeing or knowing/feeling what's in someones else's mind. Thought transmission is treu telepathy, but even that comes in forms. Telepathy along side physics and music is also a universal language. It's the language everybody understands, but not everybody speaks
Could telepathy, and maybe other ESP, go from quantum scale to biological scale in human brain?
Extraordinary Sensory Perception.
If consciousness is foundational and ESP just describes the interconnectedness of consciousness amongst those who possess it, I have to question how familial attacks and murders occur so frequently with no forewarning, even when they are planned well in advance. You would think some sense of the impending situation would be passed on to the target of the action through this shared consciousness by the planner/perpetrator. This one point doesn't negate the hypothesis, but it is something to consider.
Has anything he's saying here ever been published as a result or finding suggesting ESP is real in a peer reviewed accredited scientific journal?
There is a video here on youtube, that was about the tests they ran in a laboratory setting using a random number generator
specifically designed for the experiment. They went into detail about the methods and final statistical analysis of the results, taking into account all the variables.
@@buddyrichable1 But a RUclips video is not a peer reviewed accredited scientific journal. Unless your research, results and findings are being scrutinized by scientific peers knowledgeable in the field -- who's sole purpose is to find even the tiniest flaws or inaccuracies in your methods, data collection, analysis or interpretation of results -- then your research is not of the highest caliber necessary to be accepted by the scientific community in general. It is because of such high standards that the science we have today works. There are journals who's worth and reputation rests on not publishing data or results later found to be wrong or inaccurate. For example, the journal, _Nature,_ is one of these. You look at a paper in _Nature_ and you know it's scientific method and interpretation of results are going to be airtight.
@@longcastle4863 I find it remarkable that anyone who asserts the value of peer review research are often themselves guilty of not doing their own research. For example, a simple Google engine search on Dean Radin's official website will direct you to over 100 academic articles appearing in peer reviewed journals ranging from The Foundation of Physics and Physics Essays to Psychological Bulletin, Psychology of Consciousness and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Because that was so easy to find, I'm led to believe that your question is a rhetorical one premised on the assumption that none of this can actually be real. It's pretty easy to spot a real question as opposed to the ones that are actually statements. On a related topic, Michael Persinger-the inventor of the God helmet - insists that psi is real despite the fact he used to be a materialist sceptic and Michael Shermer's go-to source whenever he tried to debunk this phenomenon. Persinger also has a lot of peer review on the neurological physics on this topic but it's a bit camaflaged in order to get financing for this kind of research. See the popular video, No More Secrets, a RUclips video, for an overview of his work. Frankly, none of that actually convinces me that any of this is real. It's my personal experiences that mostly convince me. If you notice, Dean added that creative types typically showed higher effect sizes in psi than the average person or someone who leans more "right-brained" or analytical. Though I love science and studied it at university, I'm also a professional illustrator/artist. So I'm a mixed bag who always has this inner dialogue going on where on the one hand I keep having these experiences and then there's the sceptic in me that likes to test those experiences via sceptical inquiry. Hope that helps
Yes.
Dean Is The Best!!!! Forget about all the others
Its funny how there is STILL a rather strong vibe afoot "as if" its simply a given that Radin doesn't do solid science & that the evidence for PSI(in whatever of its various forms & especially collectively) isn't FAR beyond what is typically acceptable as statistically significant for "understood" sciences/experimental results. The several decades of work done at Princeton alone(the home of Einstein mind you) should have at least raised some eyebrows. But of course, everyone involved MUST have just been mistaken in ALL instances. People even go so far as to really believe in an infinite # of imaginary universes for which there is ZERO empirical evidence mind you. Its ANYTHING but that perhaps its just our current preferred worldviews/narratives/metaphysics(mostly materialism/physical realism, a philosophy mind you) that needs updating. There is little question that such behaviors do indeed occur in nature & they are fundamentally no more or less baffling than Quantum weirdness itself, which is widely accepted. But thats OK since its only for "small things"🤔. Theres NO way attention/intention/mind/the C-word/experience(the ONLY thing we've ever had AND the only thing that we can be certain of btw) could possibly "fit" into the picture, since its "ONLY" a meaningless epi-phenomenon. We(our mindsets at large) will be laughed at eventually. If I was a betting man, I'd bet a few precious fingers on it.
Everyone has experienced ESP at some point in there lives I’ve had dreams that have shown me certain situations but until it happens I then remember the dream I’ve also had dreamt of lottery numbers only once but couldn’t remember the last two numbers it came in that weekend I was so convinced I told my work colleague he had a punt too.
About 20 yrs ago I dreamt my football team won 2-0 and I'm still waiting 😀😀seriously next day they won 2-0, strange lititle things happen in life that can't be explained physically.👍
Einstein has a lot to answer to for calling quantum entanglement 'Spooky action at a distance'. Now anybody with a claim to some paranormal gift can hold the 'non-locality' card up in the hope that it makes their claim sound more plausible.
Please remember- there is no way around checking the data on ESP for yourself. Radon has a good overview on his site.
@Mean While I am not following?
@Mean While I am saying to read the papers yourself, and you are suggesting 'to not try their methods'. What is your point?
Love these videos! I had to laugh out loud watching this one because, as he was speaking about shared experiences, I immediately knew the next words out of his mouth which concerned the Miracle at Fatima. How did I know? Maybe it's something like artificial intelligence which was created, at the outset, for software which predicts the next word you're going to type. The intersubjectivity that he is speaking about has some basis in reality. We all have the same notions of time and space and various concepts, but inter-subjectivity does not translate into shared thinking. Although we all know the rules of the game, it does not mean I know the move a player is about to make...
Dean Radin is a clear independent thinker, not bogged down by dogma.
To the "ant" music comes from the radio. To the human the music comes from the radio station. To the artist the music comes from imagination.
Does imagination effect the physical world 🤔 yes, of course!
Evolution has found ways to use everything from chemistry to EM fields, vibration, and even quantum mechanics to give biological systems sensory perceptions. It would "make sense" to assume that we're not fully aware of what we're aware of, or how we're aware of it. When was the last time you sensed the Earth's EM field? You might be surprised.
It just takes a little more openness on the part of physicist to get off their high horse to accept observations that are normal everyday human experience. Example of these scientist include Sean carol, Roger , Einstein himself and others. This guy appears very honest but read Nature article on how Dean was put down.
Where these videos made in the 90’s?
This vídeo was made in voo doo because left behind reality sense in real world. Challatan minds of course.
I would be really interested in a comprehensive critical analysis of the data Dean is speaking of.
Don't hold your breath :)
The position of most paranormal researchers is that they don’t need evidence- for some reason their claims should not be subjected to the same scrutiny as other claims.
There is a video on youtube about the experiments that he is referring to.
They used a random number generator specifically designed for the experiments and collected data over many trials. They detailed all of their findings in the video.
I’m sure it wouldn’t be hard to find.
@@DeanHorak But they do have a fuckton of evidence, so what are you on about? Burning strawmen, are we?
@@pandawandas ,
,
They have no evidence. Testimonials are not evidence.
Evidence is acquired by producing repeatable, testable results.
After decades (if not centuries) of trying to show paranormal is real, evidence has yet to be produced.
You can whine and cry and claim paranormal researchers don’t have to follow the scientific method - that somehow they are exempt from having such constraints, but I’m sorry - that isn’t science- that’s pseudoscience.
Maybe know what you’re talking about before looking foolish.
Hubris..is what makes you skeptical.
How does it make sense to ask if anything makes sense when you don't have a holistic theory to explain everything we definitely experience?
Only squizogrenic shows he proposes are real left behind reason in this way Nothing worthless Science. He has serious health problems in other words he are so crazy challatan.
Absolutely correct. And No. All the modern science can do is separate, divide, thus we have discrimination and can define based on contrasts of things and attributes, and this realm is the only place they can ponder with their form of methodology -- most of them today disregard metaphysics even. Acknowledging the One they do not care to engage. From what I learn for example: gravity, sound, energy, light, magnetism are all the same thing just different modalities, but they only seek to understand the parts and not the whole, therefore they cannot properly even understand the parts.
Regarding this video topic, they mostly exclude God because they cannot touch, fathom, measure or imagine the One; ESP is excluded because of lack of evidence. We know ESP is genuine, all the ancients were aware, all our scriptures are of.
Some interesting arguments.
Nice video. Very scientific point of view. Perhaps a layman’s point of view should be offered. Like examples of cases. Identical twins and their results.
I'm glad there are people out there who make a career of looking into things like this. What a profound change in just about everything we understand about consciousness and thought if this was true. But it really looks like it is not and this probably should be relegated to the fringe of study, as it has been. There's just enough there that if you wanted to take a leap of faith and believe that you could muster some science up to look at it, but just barely. I think his explanation that since quantum physics allows for nonlocality that this someone allows for esp or possibly even explains it is just far-fetched and really a poor argument.
I think we dont even try ... once , a few years ago i started to write down the dreams i had each night. After a month the dreams were much much stronger, true experiences. Then i stopped because well life is always demanding too much attention but i wonder if i could have reached lucid dreaming and maybe deeper perceptions. I am not sure if ESP exists or not (i am more inclined not) but i am pretty sure that we dont practice enough and basically arent studied seriously anyway.
Excellent.... thanks 🙏.
Sources!
I have experienced telepathy twice. Of course I cannot prove anything. But I wouldnt be surprised to see some scientific breakthroughs in this area in the near future.
science is not funded to research ESP, telepathy, remote viewing and clairvoyance. Science is also wrong from einstein onward.
NEVER telepathy are place Science experiente in this sense when telepathy rejected reason Science falied . Telepathy is place where challatan show absurd concept.
Would love to hear about your 2 experiences. I've had a few of my own.
I checked.. It's still not April 1st. Close though.
Would like the refernces for the ganzfeld and the doible effect in special gifted people
You say you are scientists and say the effects are “pretty good” and “even bigger”. How about some numbers? P< 0.01? ‘
1:02 extra sensory what?? isnt it suppose to be perseption at the end? Whats going on here....
Is instant communication of telepathy like instant communication in quantum field?
wrote a thesis on parapsychology and found no verification for ESP. Every message needs a medium. None yet found for ESP. So far every non-physical phenomenon has had a physical substrait. Giving something a label does not give it any credence or provide explanatory power
What if the Higgs Field is conscious?
Why all of the unnecessary skepticism for a field which shows real, statistically significant effects? So much dogma in science nowadays.
I communicate better non-verbally
Aether theory supports ESP.
Interview Paul Selig.
that was great
Just no.
What's esp
I would like to hear more about what quantum biology has to offer on this subject. Quantum tunneling of electrons is thought to occur in chlorophyll. In neurons it is thought to occur in organelles called micro tubules. And let us hear more about the QM/QFT mechanisms where complex numbers and even quaternions figure in. Do unlikely events occur within micro tubules given enough iterations? Could ESP be a modifier of complex weighting factors and ultimately a higher probability of seemingly "magical" things happening in the brain? How apparent are these effects when we try to observe them? Do they vanish under direct observation but would manifest with less direct observation such as statistical analysis?
How on earth could one mind, trapped in the skull communicate with another mind also trapped in a skull. There is nothing there, move on.
They are virtual brains, you are correct, well done 😂👏👍
“The idea of making sense” yeah, just going to step over that and blab nonsense for 10 minutes.
The data this guy is talking about has been heavily questioned and many say that there's no statistically significance to show what he says it shows. It's just very easy for small unseen methodological problems with experiments or the meta-analysis to mess up your final conclusions. Also, note that what he's talking about isnt even scientific because he has no theory at all to describe what he's talking about. And of course, if you have no theoretical support for your claims, then it's pretty much impossible to falsify it. This is nothing but pseudoscience. He just starts to talk about things like entanglement because he thinks it will lend his claims validity, to make people think that at least there's SOME basis in physics for what he's claiming. But, there's really NO reason to think that quantum effects like these have any effect on the macro level to the extent that ESP would require. The only believable thing he said is that it's all nonsense.
First, you missed the point of the video. it's just a conversation. Second, if you listened to it, it is even pointed out that the data is controversial. Third, Dr. Radin admits in the video they are looking for the evidence of a connection between the quantum and physical (in the context of looking for evidence of ESP) because they don't have it yet.
Personally, I don't think ESP exists. However, discussing it and having scientists explore it may turn up evidence one day, maybe not. That's what's so great about science, it constantly explores things and tries to make sense of a fantastic universe.
What a load of hogwash.
Sounds like BS.
You know what sounds even more bs? Your conciousness yet we all act like it exists with 0 experiments
What a load of bunk.
Glad you pushed back on his bogus claims, even in a diplomatic way.
What is?
Who is?
I’m sorry but if your version of science does not require repeatable, testable evidence, it’s not science - it’s religion.
@@DeanHorak Ok? So why did we invest billions in search of dark matter yet have 0 evidence in 30 years for it?
Heck ESP at least have some statistical evidence. Is dark matter a religion?
@@janeferess411 ,
ESP has been debunked over and over again. The claimed statistics have been shown to be biased by researchers or faulty controls.
Dark matter is a hypothesis - no scientists claim it is factual - it’s a possibility, so we do experiments to rule it in or rule it out.
First!
You win!
@@FireHorse489 I'd take a Winnebago! But, I wasn't first.. So, I guess he wins a lifetime of closer to truth shorts here on RUclips.. Not a bad thing if you ask me.. this channel is awesome.. all their videos so such a low view count.. when it should be in the top 10.. honestly I support any comment or interaction on this channel.. the world needs more of this type of conversations.. it's a joyride for the mind.. love it
I had a vision of someone smashing Dean Radin's knees with a baseball bat in the future.
Presuming this was an actual vision rather than simply wishful thinking, I would advise Dean to be careful out there.
I am a bokor and rarely are my visions wrong.
🙄🙄🙄
Total nonsense! We've known for a while that ESP is BS!
There is ZERO EVIDENCE. WTF is this??
🐟 06. CONSCIOUSNESS/AWARENESS:
Consciousness means “that which knows” or “the state of being aware”, from the Latin prefix “con” (with), the stem “scire” (to know) and the suffix “osus” (characterized by). There is BOTH a localized knowing and a Universal Awareness, as explicated in the following paragraphs.
Higher species of animal life have sufficient cognitive ability to KNOW themselves and their environment, at least to a measurable degree. Just where consciousness objectively begins in the animal kingdom is a matter of contention but, judging purely by ethological means, it probably starts with vertebrates (at least the higher-order birds and fishes). Those metazoans which are evolutionarily lower than vertebrates do not possess much, if any, semblance of intellect, necessary for true knowledge, but operate purely by reflexive instincts. For instance, an insect or amphibian does not consciously decide to seek food but does so according to its base instincts, directed by its idiosyncratic genetic code. Even when a cockroach flees from danger, it is not experiencing the same kind of thoughts or feelings a human or other mammal would experience.
The brain is merely a conduit or TRANSDUCER of Universal Consciousness (i.e. Brahman), explaining why the more intelligent the animal, the more it can understand its own existence (or at least be aware of more of its environment - just see how amazingly-complex dolphin and whale behaviour can be, compared with other aquatic species), and the reason why it is asserted that a truly enlightened human must possess a far higher level of intelligence than the average person. The processing unit of a supercomputer must be far larger, more complex and more powerful than the processor in a pocket calculator. Therefore, it seems logical to conclude that the scale of discrete (localized) consciousness is dependent on the animal's brain capacity.
See Chapter 17 to understand the distinction between enlightenment and mere awakening.
Three STATES of awareness are experienced by humans and possibly all other species of mammals:
the waking state (“jāgrata”, in Sanskrit), dreaming (“svapna”, in Sanskrit), and deep-sleep (“suṣupti”, in Sanskrit). Beyond these three temporal states is the fourth “state” (“turīya” or “caturīya”, in Sanskrit). That is the unconditioned, eternal “state”, which underlies the other three.
The waking state is the LEAST real (that is to say the least permanent, or to put it another way, the farthest from the Necessary Ground of Existence, as explained towards the end of this chapter). The dream state is closer to our eternal nature, whilst dreamless deep-sleep is much more analogous to The Universal Self (“brahman”), as it is imbued with peace. Rather than being an absence of awareness, deep-sleep is an awareness of absence (that is, the absence of phenomenal, sensual experiences). So, in actual fact, the fourth state is not a state, but the Unconditioned Ground of Being, or to put it simply, YOU, the real self/Self, or Existence-Awareness-Peace (“sacchidānanda”, in Sanskrit).
Perhaps the main purpose of dreams is so that we can understand that the waking-state is practically indistinguishable to the dream-state, and thereby come to see the ILLUSION of this ephemeral world. Both our waking-state experiences and our dream-state experiences occur solely within the mental faculties (refer to Chapter 04 for an elucidation of this phenomenon). If somebody in one of your dreams were to ask your dream-state character if the dream was real, you (playing the part of that character) would most likely say, “yes, of course this is real!” Similarly, if someone were to ask your waking-state character if this world is real, you would almost undoubtedly respond in kind.
An apt analogy for Universal Consciousness is the manner in which electricity powers a variety of appliances and gadgets, according to the use and COMPLEXITY of the said device. Electricity powers a washing machine in a very simple manner, to drive a large spindle for laundering clothes. However, the very same electrical power may be used to operate a computer to manifest an astonishing range of outputs, such as playing audiovisual tracks, communication tasks, and performing extremely advanced mathematical computations, depending on the computer's software and hardware. The more advanced/complex the device, the more complex its manifestation of the same electricity.
Using the aforementioned computer analogy: the brain is COMPARATIVELY equivalent to the computer hardware, deoxyribonucleic acid akin to the operating system working in conjunction with the memory, the intellect is equivalent to the processing unit, individuated consciousness is analogous to the software programme, whilst Universal Awareness is likened to the electricity which enlivens the entire computer system.
A person who is comatosed has lost any semblance of local consciousness, yet is being kept alive by the presence of Universal Consciousness.
The fact that many persons report out-of-body experiences, where consciousness departs from the gross body, may be evidence for the above.
So, then, following-on from the assertion made in the third paragraph, one could complain: “That's not fair - why can only a genius be enlightened?” (as defined in Chapter 17). The answer is: first of all, as stated above, every species of animal has its own level of intelligence on a wide-ranging scale. Therefore, a pig or a dog could (if possible) ask: “That's unfair - why can only a human being be enlightened?”
Secondly, it is INDEED a fact that life is unfair, because there is no “tit for tat” law of action and reaction, even if many supposedly-great religious preceptors have stated so. They said so because they were preaching to wicked miscreants who refused to quit their evil ways, and needed to be chastized in a forceful manner. It is not possible to speak gentle words to a rabid dog to prevent it from biting you.
There is evidence of Consciousness being a universal field, in SAVANT SYNDROME, a condition in which someone with significant mental disabilities demonstrate certain abilities far in excess of the norm, such as superhuman rapid mathematical calculation, mind-reading, blind-seeing, or astounding musical aptitude. Such behaviour suggests that there is a universal field (possibly in holographic form) from which one can access information. Even simple artistic inspiration could be attributed to this phenomenon. The great British singer-songwriter, Sir James Paul McCartney, one day woke with the complete tune of the song, “Yesterday”, in his mind, after hearing it in a dream. American composer, Paul Simon, had a similar experience when the chorus of his sublime masterpiece, “Bridge Over Troubled Water”, simply popped into his head.
Cont...
In recent years, the term “CONSCIOUSNESS” has been used in esoteric spiritual circles (usually capitalized) to refer to a far more Homogeneous Consciousness (“puruṣa”, in Sanskrit), due to the fact that the English language doesn’t include a single word denoting the Universal Ground of Being (for instance “Brahman”, “Tao”, in other tongues). The word “Awareness” (capitalized) is arguably a more apposite term for this concept.
The typical person believes that the apparatus which knows the external world is his mind (via the five senses), but more perceptive individuals understand that the mind itself is cognizable by the intellect. Wise souls recognize that the sense of self (the pseudo-ego) is the perceiver of their intellects, whereas awakened persons have realized that the true self/Self is the witness of ALL these temporal phenomena.
The true self is synonymous with Consciousness, or with Infinite Awareness, or the Undifferentiated Unified Field (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit).
The dialectic exercise in the following three paragraphs should help one to understand the nature of the fundamental conscious observer, that is, the ULTIMATE observer of all phenomena (i.e. the subject/Subject, which is the authentic self, as opposed to material objects):
If one were to ask you whether you are the same person or individual you were at birth (or even at conception), you would probably respond in the affirmative. So, then, what PRECISELY is it about you which has remained constant since conception? In other words, what is the self-identity you had as an infant, which is the present “you”? It cannot be any part of your body or mind, since none of the atoms or molecules in your zygote body are extant, and “you” certainly did not possess a mind at conception. If you are reasonably intelligent, you may claim that your genome is the same now as it was then. However, it has recently been scientifically demonstrated that genetic code can (and usually does) change throughout an individual’s lifetime. Furthermore, nobody actively conceives of their essential nature being a bunch of genes!
More intelligent souls would probably counter thus: “The thing which stays the same from my birth to the present time is my sense of self.” This too, is fallacious, since the sense of self does not emerge until at least a couple of years after birth. An infant has no ideation of itself as an individual actor. You may then say “I was a (male/female) human being” but that doesn’t specify any PARTICULAR human (you, yourself).
So, then, what EXACTLY is it which remains “you” from conception till death? That is the “I am” which precedes any artificial sense of self. In other words, rather than saying “I am a man/woman/human/king/pilot/etc.”, simply the impersonal sense of “I am”. That is the true self, which is the Universal Self. Therefore, your essential nature is Cosmic Consciousness, usually called “God” by theists (see also Chapter 10).
The Tao (The Reality [lit. The Way, The Path, or The Road]) which can be expressed in language is not the REAL Tao. All concepts are, by nature, relative, and at most, can merely point to the Absolute. That explains why some branches of theology use the apophatic method of discerning The Infinite (“neti neti”, [not this, not that], in Sanskrit). Also known in Latin as “via negativa” or “via negationis” theology, this philosophical approach to discovering the essential nature of Reality, gradually negates each description about Ultimate Reality, but not Reality Itself.
Ultimate Reality (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit [from “bṛh” - lit. “Expansion”, in English]) alone is real - “real” in the sense that it is the never-mutable substratum of ALL existence. The wisest of the philosophers of ancient India distinguished the “real” from the “unreal” (“sat/asat”, in Sanskrit) by whether or not the “thing“ was eternal or ephemeral (cf. Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1:3:28, Bhagavad-gītā 2:16, et altri).
Gross material objects (such as one's own body) and subtle material objects (such as thoughts) are always changing, and therefore not “real”.
REALITY is clearly seen by those self-realized persons who have experienced spiritual awakenings (which occur either spontaneously, or after a gradual process over many months or years), yet only intellectually understood by those who have merely studied spiritual topics (that is, those who have practiced one of the four systems of religion described in Chapter 16, but have yet to awaken to their essential nature).
“If you remain as you are now, you are in the wakeful state. This is abolished in the dream state.
The dream state disappears, when you are in deep sleep. The three states come and go, but you are always there.
Your real state, that of Consciousness itself, continues to exist always and forever and it is the only Reality.”
*************
“The ego is the identified consciousness. When the impersonal Consciousness identifies itself with the personal organism, the ego arises.”
*************
“The only true meditation is the constant impersonal witnessing of all that takes place in one’s life as mere movements in the universal Consciousness.”
*************
“Consciousness must first be there, before anything else can BE. All inquiry of the seeker of truth, must therefore, relate to this consciousness, this sense of conscious presence, which as such, has no personal reference to any individual.”
*************
“Insofar as you keep watching the mind and discover yourself as its witness, nothing else can project itself on the screen of consciousness.
This is so, because two things cannot occupy the attention, at the same moment.Therefore, delve within and find out where thoughts arise.
Seek the source of all thought and acquire the Self-knowledge, which is the awakening of Truth.”
*************
“Just as the difference between the space in a pot and the space outside it disappears when the pot is demolished, so also does duality disappear when it is realized that the difference between the individual consciousness and the Universal Consciousness does not in fact exist.”
*************
“All there is, is consciousness. That is the Source from which the manifestation has come.
...And the mind is merely a reflection of that Consciousness.”
*************
“All there is, is Consciousness, not aware of Itself in Its noumenal Subjectivity, but perceived by Itself as phenomenal manifestation in Its objective expression. If this is understood in depth, there is nothing more to be understood.”
Ramesh S. Balsekar,
Indian Spiritual Teacher.
“As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clearheaded science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about the atoms this much: There is no matter as such! All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Spirit. This Spirit is the matrix of all matter.”
*************
“I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.”
Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck,
German Theoretical Physicist.
But any definition of Consciousness is Self-Defined since no one knows what it is Absolutely. It may be something that does not exist at all. Its like someone says is there Unicorn or Big Foot. These are invented terms
@@1stPrinciples455
Kindly repeat that in ENGLISH, Miss.☝️
@@1stPrinciples455 by that reasoning it could be argued that anything anyone has ever encountered at any time, material or not, might not actually exist, including this very comment that I write and you read.
Incidentally all "terms"are essentially "invented".
You wrote a term paper, and left out the detail that AI, will never have, and human intelligence, rarely has. Wisdom.
What McCartney, and Simon have, is the supernatural, equivalent to charisma. Outside the understanding of science.