Intolerant India ? Sofiya Rangwala, François Gautier, Shefali Vaidya, Pt Satish K Sharma discuss

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 окт 2024

Комментарии • 21

  • @arweyn1
    @arweyn1 Год назад +4

    My pranaams to the panelists and namaste to my guru Pandit Satish Sharmaji.

  • @makumbuko
    @makumbuko Год назад +3

    You cannot reason with intolerant neither can you be tolerant with violent. Hindus need to unite and fight every which way the situation requires at the time

  • @jogendra8249
    @jogendra8249 Год назад +3

    Jai Hindu Rashtra 🚩🚩🚩

  • @arweyn1
    @arweyn1 Год назад +5

    We need to give ourselves a chance, we need to give Bharat a chance and we do it by giving Modi a chance. Yes, with all his shortcomings whatever they maybe, he is the best chance we have. We need to be appreciative and supportive of him..and of course critical to help him to help us all. We live in exciting times.

  • @parameahwarbt4920
    @parameahwarbt4920 Год назад +3

    Sir pl provide english subtitles also

  • @kunalseth6437
    @kunalseth6437 Год назад +1

    🕉️

  • @chaitanyakada1341
    @chaitanyakada1341 Год назад

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @leenapaul4513
    @leenapaul4513 Год назад +1

    The abroad settled patriotic Hindus are responsible for the intolerance in India
    They are have all wealth family property and citizenship abroad but lecture on patriotism

    • @ananthan8951
      @ananthan8951 Год назад

      Mass conversion by predatory religions is not freedom of religion. All the fetters are cleverly placed on the Hindu Dharma alone by all regimes. And you speak of intolerance! There is none, only despair. This has to change.

    • @leenapaul4513
      @leenapaul4513 Год назад

      @@ananthan8951 if Vedas were taught to all Hindus this conversions wouldn't have happened..
      The gods of the Dravidians were different from the Aryans..so didn't they also convert and then harass for centuries ..there is predator then Brahmins who slaved the locals for centuries

    • @ananthan8951
      @ananthan8951 Год назад

      @@leenapaul4513 Vedas couldn't have been taught to all Hindus..Vedas aren't like the Bible. The correct recital of a Veda required more than a decade of systematic study. Then on to meaning and other branches of it. How many can do it even now? Both knowledge of Itihasa and purana, and professional knowledge in many fields were widespread until the Islamic invasions in the North. If the Hindus were not educated, how do you reckon India could remain the most prosperous economy in all recorded history until the Seventeenth Century, according to British economic historian Angus Maddison?

    • @ananthan8951
      @ananthan8951 Год назад +1

      @@leenapaul4513 What Dravidians? Only some Tamizh politicians under the influence of Western Christian missionaries cooked up the Aryan Dravidian theory. Dravida means enveloped by Drava or water, a term used for the South Eastern Coast going back to the Mahabharata. People of Kerala Karnataka and Andhra do not consider themselves "Dravidian". Brahmans were those who took up learning spiritual practices and rituals as a life vocation. In Buddhist lore the Brahmin was typically described as "a poor learned Brahmin". Buddhist texts as well as Buddhist rulers accorded high respect to Brahmins for their contributions to society. So don't divide Hindus by colonial devices. That era has passed.

    • @leenapaul4513
      @leenapaul4513 Год назад

      @@ananthan8951 if your ancestors had suffered you wouldn't come up with this theory...and this stupid explanation