I Built A Tank That Would've WON WW1 EASILY In Sprocket Tank Design Game!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 авг 2024
- I Built A Tank That Would've WON WW1 EASILY In Sprocket Tank Design Game!
Twitter:
/ franticmatty
Join Frantic's Discord:
/ discord
#sprocket #frantic #WW1
The biggest challenge in WW1 wasn't to arm or protect the tank, but to get it to move
Came here to say the same.
@@lostalone9320 so did i
This tank wouldnt move for long.
Theres no clearance around the tracks, and they would foul (and be uncleanable) almost immediately.
The problem is he designed a tank on paper without thinking into account the actual mechanical principle making it into creation. Having 5 gun breaches on a single turret in that rotation, good luck....
I find it hilarious how there's so much space in the tank but all the crew are forced into the turrets.
If it’s anything like a Mark IV or V it’s probably for the best they all crowd around the turret. They might just be able to dodge the moving parts of the running engine in the middle of the tank lol.
@@brianzhang349 lol
@@brianzhang349 yea
That period don’t sound very exciting to me
@@usvmchc2843 I doubt it sounds like anything.
The two turret side by side does create what is called a shot trap in between them. Would be risky in a real world situation but I can easily see ww1 designers making this mistake. Great content either way.
This was actually seen on the American M2A2 from 1935. It had 2 turrets side by side with a .50 machine gun in the left turret and a .30 machine gun in the right turret
Well, Vickers did it shortly after WWII. That tank became the basis of the T-26 (two turrets, initially), the Polish 7TP, and several other tanks.
And the British built the Cruiser Tank, Mk. I with two machine gun turrets in front of the main turret. Heck, the Soviet T-28 had the same configuration.
The real problem was that communication from turret to turret was impossible, so there was zero coordination.
Or between-war period. Look at T-35 and Excelciour
@@ethanmckinney203 And T-35 had 5 turrets
All I can think about when you were having issues with the gunners not shooting is that meme "it's under the sauce. It's under the sauce. The cheese is under the sauce" but in this case it's "your commander doesn't have a seat. Your commander doesn't have a seat." Lol
lmao
"When one gun wasnt enough bring more guns"
@@EndahAsnawati -some american probably
I never heard of that meme before,where did it come from?
@@BrunoMaricFromZagreb a guy on tiktok perplexed by chicago pizza, and another guy reacting to the video
The Vickers six-ton tank, an interwar design never used by Britain but sold to many other countries, had an A and a B type: one with twin one-man machine gun turrets much like this, one with the first example of a co-axial machine gun in a mount with a 2 pounder quick-firing gun in a two-man turret.
To be honest u can put polish decals in way u did before and it wont be a mistake. It was vertical for over 70 years before 1993.
Duel Gatling Tank. How to say screw you and the fortification you are in.
Yea it literally two Gatling guns in turrets
Fax
Dual hotchkins revolving cannons
The amount of quality, length and upload rate of this channel is absolutely mental
Fr he is uploading 2 videos a day and they are really good
indubitably🤓🤓
I won't be surprised if someone joked to him like he can't become a youtuber and he just started this to prove a point xD
Lol
I gues he loves what he does
Commander, driver, 2 gunners and 2 loaders all cramped up there. Would love to see the midgets doing the acrobatics operating that thing.
This is what the Oompa Loompas were doing before being hired by Willy Wonka.
Your creativity is crazy to me, I make like maybe 2 tanks a week then run out of ideas, and you upload two videos a day making awesome designs.
I didn't even manage that much before they added freeform building and I failed to learn how to use it and eventually gave up. I've made like... 4 tanks total. And last time I played only one of them was even still capable of being spawned in.
I love how the turrets are positioned right over the tracks, so the crew has even less space inside. They'd also have to leave the hatches open or risk gassing themselves XD
“How heavy do you want the tank?” “Yes”
This looks awesome tho
There is supposed to several inches between the tracks and the frame of your tank. Having them so close together can cause the the tracks to become jammed up if a shell dents the frame. Just a thought
"i dont think we'll be able to see them, but we'll see"
*badum tss*
Im telling you guys Frantic should get a job with the English Army. They'd be unstoppable.
... you mean the British Army?
@@nolanolivier6791 No, clearly the Redcoats.
I love how his is a much better version of the tank called a M2a2. This is like the M2a2 but the turrets with the .303 and the .50 are just replaced with 4 guns each that can actually penetrate a tank.
You can just call it a rotary cannon for simplicity's sake. The firing one after the other is called "volley fire" even though you'd think a volley would be all at once. So you're building a dual rotary cannon volley fire WWI tank. You should make the turrets alternate their fire, so one fires then the otherside then the otherside, etc. That way you have an actual sustained fire that you can space out across the reload time.
Also, what a version of the game if they made a Frantic version of it. Frantic Bop it. Bop it! Twist it! Squidge it!!!!
Add three turrets and call it the Cerberus. Or even eight and call it the Hyrda.
This one would be called the Gemini.
But the turrets are laying mostly over the tracks? This needs ewoks to fire
Giant, slow, expensive metal coffin filled with gunpowder and people. Brilliant!
There is a hand cracked rotary cannon. Hotchkiss. They were used for the late nineth century navy. As a close defense gun.
From my experience, guns don't work properly (shoot, move, etc) if they're too close together. Worth giving a try :)
“Sir there’s a problem with our Gatling tank, we put the gunners sight directly behind the breach so every time the gunner acquires a target and engages, the 5 breaches pulverise the loaders into powder, how do we fix this?”
“Add a second turret and 10 spare loaders”
I kinda want to see a version of this game, but instead, it's in Warhammer, that would be fun
Holy shit they turned a 3D modeling CAD program into a tank game
The polish tank is the 7TP DW, which stands for "7-mio tonowy polski" - "7 tonned polish" and "Dwu-Wieżowy" - "Double Turreted?". The entire project was build to fight infantry with two mashine guns, and was a modification of the main 7TP tank, which was based on the Vickers tank. Also, great work mate!
This Tank was a damn fun idea! I'd love to see a 2.0 of it... maybe a WW2 Sequel that attempted to learn from the mistakes of this one? :D
Hi
was watching the artillery one, but saw this and watched it instead
Ello :)
@@FranticMatty :)
you dont want "dual transmission" when choosing an underpowered vehicle, because theres too much lost to ATTEMPTING to move the other track in the opposite direction, rather than simply using its friction to apply a torque in the desired direction with the powered track on the other side
"We have fourteen people in this tank!"
Some of them are chipmunks judging by the positioning of those viewing slits. Chipmunks sitting on top of the breach of your cannons. Also I hope that driver's slit is meant to be a periscope or else you're gonna need to find a guy with a really flat head.
Trying to make a space marine land raider, huh? That game probably needs a physics update, and some more components added, like an autoloader
The issue comes from the internal design, loading those guns would have been near impossible.
A man sprinting at 20 mph with a lunge mine ready to blow himself and the tank to pieces
I wonder, can one make a tank in Sprocket that is like the Panjandrum, also known as The Great Panjandrum, it was a massive, rocket-propelled, explosive laden cart designed by the British military during World War II.
as a Pole, this tank is probable except for the fact that Poles are always so poor, we would never be able to afford even a single gun
The type of gun you're looking for is either a Volley Gun. They're a type of singular gun with multiple single shot barrels that fire either, all at once, hence Volley, or Sequentially.
Edit: Additional information.
im happy i watched this, gave me inspiration and a better understanding on how to build tanks in this game. thanks!!
Understanding? This guy put turrets literally over goddamn tracks)
This one is pretty cool, needs a few more horses for speed, but otherwise well done.
It is a ww1 tank but yes for convenience sake
Frantic: i love it! This is so cool! Me: 200% correct.
There is a semi automatic cannon, a Hotchkiss (spelling?). It is a hand cranked just like the old civil war gatling gun. The main difference is mostly internal. But you basically just fill up the hopper with ammo, then you point it at your target and crank. I believe that it came in 25 mm to 40 mm. It used H.E. rounds. It was adopted by the US NAVY as a anti Boarding weapon to walk explosive shells to the boats full of boarders. It was easy to aim, relatively, being on a boat and all. The common caliber was the 1 inch, or 25 mm.
Quick, save it!
LOL!!!The crew is sitting on the threads!
37:26 that laugh was like a demon
Question about the machine guns in sprocket: are they functional or just purely decorative?
I think you can shoot them but I don't think there is any infantry in the game so they are sort of redundant
@@ethanguest3438 that's interesting, i wonder what the highest achievable rate of fire using multiple machine guns is in sprocket.
@@ethanguest3438 no they dont work at all
@@peracality7648 oh, I thought they did, nvm
I rate this as a D failure, you fail to take into account the rapid load fail rate and cooling problems for your gun design at that time period
This looks more like a early 1920s design to me. But still fun and cool
congratulations, you've reinvented the M2a2
I wouldn't call this a WW1 vehicle.
28:48 90 degrees is originally for air force but sometimes it was used like this in tanks too. It was time when no one really cared for way you put this on the tank XD
you should make a tog II but with a 7 barrel turret
Hey, just wanted to say that the polish air force checkerboard is squared and not diamond shaped, dunno who said it should be placed like that, overall i love the vid
Yeah the air force one is square but the armored force is like that
I like this idea, don't get me wrong, I love the double turret and the armor setup is great, but the tank fails to make room for the gunners to reload, the gunners would have such a pain full and hard time reloading the guns, and there is no way to see left, right or backwards.
You should make like an m8 Scott type tank.
Very nice I would actually want you to make another video like this with a tank with multiple guns
1:15 if you're talking about geting them symmetrical there's a button bottom left for that
Are you able to make a wh40k land raider crusader tank in that game?
I remember when I first found you on a comodo video, you've worked a lot to get 130k subs. Nice
That Bro is a True "Red Alert 2" Fan.
the only thing that annoys me about this is that the gunner sight isn't in between the cannon rings
28:44 1 it's supposed to go on straight and 2 it's from the airforce they didn't put it on tanks
lol it fired at the melody of "ja må han leva"
The minigun does not require a automatic gun licence cause its clasafied as multiple different guns not one gun
First like and comment and found it after 27 sec
Noice :)
Thats a polish airforce checker board and its meant to sit in a square not diamond. A quick google search would prove that as well
"would have won WW1 easily" meanwhile - WW1 troops who dont have anything to pen an actual tank.
The tracks needed to be the original way. The way the pins assemble to link them all together requires it.
your polish decal is not period correct. You had it right before you rotated it. Whoever is telling you otherwise is wrong. The flag is called the Roundel of Poland.
I was certain that they wouldn't allow you to put neither a turbo or irm if you put the improved movement module on
Guess I guessed wrong
What Is this type of glitch?
I had written this comment under a wot video, didn't even know this channel existed 8 days ago
@@fannyboy8294 lol
@@fannyboy8294 noice
I was here when you had 20-50k, nice to see you grow because a big little amount of subscribers for your content back then was surprising due to the fact it was and still is really good. Keep up the good work!
Make the tonk meme
Edit: thank you!
Artillery would have ANNIHILATED this thing!!! Cool build though
This looks like the mammoth hull from tanki. Amazing video!
I suggest a mobile sphere based on the StarWars droid BB-8. Its going to be nuclear battery powered and its weapon will be a siesmic source that emits a sound that causes bone to pulverize.
If you dont turn that decal 90 degrees it looks like Purina Pet Food logo!! LOL!!
Arty gonna love you long time. Just like WW1.
thx from Poland
You forgot about planes, anti-tank infantry, and artillery
as i LOVE tanks ( i played world of tanks since beta until it became utter garbage), you just advertized THE perfect game for me, to me.
can you imagine Sprocket X War Thunder, designing a tank with even more realistic mechanic, and multiplayer?
Would have liked to have seen the mannequin after removing the suit.
Basicly yet another early Vickers.
This tank definitely could not have won the First World War. But it could easily ruin the manufacturer. The hull is the most expensive in terms of materials, but the gun is among the most labor-intensive.
Please Play More Stormworks You Inspired Me
Build a L3/33cc tank or inspired by it
Historically speaking the multiple barrels is not too out of place but on a tank it is on a ww1 tank
some warhammer 40k type shit right here
Warhammer 40k Orky creativity! I like it!
Need to add more Ammunition if you can due to the High Rate of Fire.
it looks like a tank with long broom stick cannons
Almost half of each turret is over the tracks making there not enough room for more loaders
It would made more sense if you put that small cannons and 1 big cannon
Camo was not common in WWI. It was common to go without it in WWII.
damn bro just shrunk the crew
I still think this tank is one of your best creations :)
definition of a ‘TOG II’
7:45 it looks like a WW2 French tank 😂
you could've placed the turrets on the sides, but it still looks cool
Markings are correct for Polish Armor Corps
This thing reminds me of the Gatling Tank from Yuri's Revenge
Are they fighting these battles on the moon? It doesn't look like any place you would fight on earth.
Fun fact, The U.S. actually had a double machine gun turreted tank in WWII.
@FranticMatty You should make a tank that shoots 360. sorry for being an hour late frantic.
The reality is that any tank that was reliable and could be mass produced would have won WW1. The key tactical problem was that artillery was very slow but absolutely critical. Tanks provide mobile infantry support artillery, and that's the one thing you need to win the war.
There was never much chance of a proper breakthrough and return to a war of motion, but it was clear that tanks were going to be effectively impossible for defenders to stop, and so anyone who had reasonable numbers of them would be free attack wherever they liked, whenever they wanted.
That's a huge problem, because up until then you have had to concentrate guns and men and defenses to repel attacks. And that was ok because it takes the attacker even longer to build up what they need. But when an attack can come anywhere without massing artillery and still be effective, now your plan is in tatters. You cannot be strong everywhere all the time.
So either the British stately dreadnaughts or the French nippy FTs were going to win the war. They could have come sooner, but the game was over as soon as they were being built in large numbers.
If you want a "perfect" tank for WW1, you are basically looking for a hybrid of the two - A larger FT with a bigger gun and a gunner/loader, which is basically a Vickers 6 ton or Panza II.