@@ΓιώργοςΔουλγερίδης-ι6δ are u out ur mind? that card is well above minimum requirements and textures which uses most vram is set to low, I've never seen a game dropping fps to single digits in RTX 2060 at 1080P medium/low settings with DLSS ever before
@@tealchief yeah, i have laptop with this gpu (115 watt), and wukong is totally playlable and run way better than this, this game barely playlable unlike wukong
Making your own engine is not for everyone especially keeping up with because if a problem comes about fixing its way harder then say unreal or unity because if the developer can't figure it out then you are out of luck especially for pc because as developer you actually much rather develop for something that hardware and software doesn't change that's why most developers can fix bugs faster on say console than pc
3 дня назад+13
@@footballtalk4857 Yeah but we havent seen anything good come out from unreal engine, newer titles are all problematic.
Good is very subjective because others have found games good or even great it just depends on your type of game style unreal engine is not good for everything but it a great tool for things the help developers and tech them things you won't learn in a engine built for one company
I mean not these guys. GSC are not a good developer and never have been one. They delayed the game for TWO AND A HALF YEARS and its still this problematic and mediocre. And not everyone remembers this, but the first game was also delayed for like four years and it also came out in a terrible state. I would not trust these developers to make their own engine, let alone a good one.
Glad you are still trying the 2060 cause that's what i use but seeing this i realize i need to upgrade. Sadly my country is entering an economic crisis so i'll have to hold onto it for now
the game is amazing, no problem there. the bugs and optimization is the problem. and the developers are from ukraine and have had to deal with bombings and an invasion. use your head before complaining kid
@@Jordanbiggs1473 the only problem is UE5 is quite notorious for being... Well, heavy on resources and he was kinda right on the game being a bit of a problem. Though it's quite impressive they ship it all while dealing with bombings and invasion. Other than that it's an authentic experience to the OG stalker.
RX 6600 here, Ryzen 7 5700X and 32gb ram, medium preset without motion blur, TAA Native with FG on runs at my monitor refresh rate at 75 fps, sometimes drops to 60-65, but turning on FSR Quality eliminates all frame drops Haven’t tried higher presets, medium looks and runs great
he did 3060 already and the rx 6600 is normally a bit faster but this game is not optimised for AMD so i would think it will have like 5% less performance
R 5 5600X + RX6650XT 32gb Ram 3600nhz works great (50-90fps) on high-epic presets/Full HD with fsr+frame generation. Picture is smooth and stable. One time had a fps drop to 15fps (major bug)
I have the exact same GPU, with a Ryzen 5 3600 CPU and 32GB 2666mhz RAM. On medium settings, the game jumps between 25-40 FPS often for me. Once the optimization patches are released, it will be better
the 10-20fps thing related to VRAM usage happen to me too with 3080 10gb, idk if the game scale and get memory leak even if you have 3TB VRAM but something messing with the optimization yep, some people think its FG issues but idk, i only have the Nukem mod for framegen so i can assume my thing is not perfect
I'm a UE5 developer and I have experienced this with Data Layers from the World Partition System. It was broken a year ago, i haven't tested it again because I'm now using the old Level Streaming System
The thing is these devs must have assigned to many assets to a single Data Layer (the one that Loads the Town assets), so when entering the town, all the assets are immediately loaded and the fps go crazy
@@WolfgangKrauser1993 I think its that, the devs talk about that for next patch, : Issues and memory allocation failures, which previously caused the game to exit unexpectedly, particularly around rendering, skeletal meshes, and quest-related cutscenes, hopefully that fix the 10-20 (even less) fps thing
I use a rtx 2060 and the game is completely unplayable, no matter what settings i use, it drops to single digit fps at some point. Mostly if you stay for like 5 minutes in a settlement, sometines even when exploring.
@@zWORMzGaming deactivate raytracing, lumen...you can google it how to do this in ini & install the optimized tweaks s2 + stalker 2 optimizer...bam you will have no more stutter...i have a 3060ti but with rtx enabled its bad ;)
@@belec5964if only it was as simple as awareness for most people. At least 90% of the games out there will play just fine on a 2060 however. It's only restricted by newly released games that aren't well optimized for the most part.
Just upgraded from this GPU in early October during prime day. I wanted to wait 1 more Generation but I didn't want to deal with these unoptimized games anymore
The only game that truly made a graphical breakthrough was Crysis. The GTX 8800 was barely enough to run it in HD, even in SLI mode. Man, even the facial animations still look superior to what we see in most modern games. At the same time, I think it was well-optimized too, crystal-clear graphics on high settings, rather than relying on features that make the game look like you’re hallucinating..... 🤢
It was only duel thrraded ganw it also came out with s.l.i suppoort. The mGPU games play way better than older s l.i or cf games on dual gpu setups. It sucks that developers won't bother implimenting mGPU to game that depratrly need it. Chernobylite supports running two rtx 4090 in mGPU with drive 566.
i hear alot of people complaining about the game glitching and lagging. Im running my game with maxed out settings and while simultaneously streaming for my buddy on discord and i havent had any lag at all. The biggest glitch ive seen is the guy pissing himself while standing up. Maybe im lucky but the games is running practically flawlessly for me so far. I do have a fairly beefy pc but ive heard people with similar pcs claim they can barely run the game which confuses me. All i can say is the game is great for me and im glad cause its some of the most fun ive had in gaming in recent years
Hey. I have the same GPU but with 16Gb of ram, you think I could still play the game without those aweful drops and still have some graphical fidelity ?
I was a Nvidia fan, but after seeing their greed in recent times decided to change to AMD. Can't be happier. For 200$ I got a great deal for a rx6800. Those 16gb of VRAM really makes you not worry about going out of memory. And the performance is great.
Yeah let's fight this terrible engine, these terrible optimized games with "more VRAM". What's gona happen in the next few years? "Oh you idiot, 16GB of VRAM is barely enough for 720p in 2028".
Finally you’ve tested the better 6GB VRAM GPU from nvidia instead of only the GTX 1060. Althrough I still wonder how this same GPU performs in Black Myth Wukong. While the RTX 2060 is AT LEAST above the minimum requirements it is actually possible to run the game at native 1080p without upscaling on lowest, but seeing how it runs on medium settings was a major disappointment. Even if it has the minimum required VRAM it still should be able to run at least medium settings, right? Well not here sadly. And I seriously hope that the patches could improve the performance.
I tried black myth wukong Benchmark tool on my 2060 laptop (115watt) and it is playlable although not 60 fps unless i use dlss performance. No massive stuttering like this, even with ray tracing
12:54 I think it depends on what you're used to, if you are a hardcore pc gamer who plays CS2 at 300fps on 240hz and low sensitivity with a zowie or logi wired mouse on a good mousepad, you will be EXTREMELY sensitive to input lag and iffy mouse inputs, Stalker 2 is gonna be a nightmare to you.
Had this experience where I played a section at around 40 fps, reloaded and was stuck at like 17. Reloaded again and was back to 40. Have you had this experience? With a particular gpu? Curious as to what might have caused that. Vram was fine, ram was fine, cpu was fine (under 50, cause ofc)
At least with this game, any graphical artifacts can be called Anomalies and look like part of the game lol. Even floating Bob, it could be radiation making him float :). I hope the developers do work on this more and get some optimisation done. This game has a lot of potential to be a great game.
Your system lags and freezes because your memory is not configured. Final settings for RTX 2060 (6GB VRAM): (AMD ryzen 9 7950X3D): (Memory: 16) r.IoDispatcher.AsyncBatchReadSizeKB=16384 r.IoDispatcher.CacheSize=16384 r.IoDispatcher.MaxParallelIoRequests=64 [SystemSettings] r.Streaming.PoolSize=4096 r.RenderTargetPoolMin=1024 r.Nanite.Streaming.MaxPendingPages=128 r.EarlyZPass=2 [TextureStreaming] r.Streaming.MaxTempMemoryAllowed=2048
I have an RTX 4080 laptop and just got the game on Gamepass. Didn't want to spend the $70 right off the bat. Gonna see how it runs. Hopefully 4K Perf DLSS on High settings will be playable
2060 is still an okay 1080p card, its just the game. it should be illegal for a game requiring a mid range modern gpu to run such a mid looking graphics. i'm sure the 2060 can handle metro exodus in 1080p like a champ and look 100% better
@@foxskyful it is a mid-low end gpu but it can do mostly 1080p high in 80% of games, and its only about 5 years old. this kind of performance is not acceptable for its age. heck even the 1060 aged better in 2020 than 2060 in 2024
@farhankurniawan7567 No, its low-med at best gpu now. 3060 and 6600xt are mid mid-low. And 1080p is low resolution 1440p is what should be minimum as normal or medium(recommended). 1060 aged well because games didnt progressed that much graphically as usual from 2015 to 2023 one of reasons why people still consider Horizon, RDR2, Witcher 3... One of best loking games even to this day. Games become more and more complex some new things are not very noticeable graphically, but have big impact on performance now also one of main reasons for having so many bad optimized games and so many other reasons i really cant write all in commnet trying to explain.
Low FPS is the result of weak GPU, not insufficient VRAM size. Insufficient VRAM will appear as distinctive stuttering. E.g. RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB in one place you can roll / turn / doing saltos and FPS will be abound. But it may stutter if you will go with your character far away on the battlefield - thus swapping new textures into VRAM. Or not ?
I have a 2060, should i get a 3070 or a 6700 xt? I play minecraft with shaders and the finals mostly, i like rt but i dont use it all the time and dlss is preferred. Only thing that worries me is that 8gb
something is not right here i'm running the game on a 1070 ti with a ryzen 5 4500 at 60 fps on medium with taa enabled and fsr frame generation enabled at 1080p and it only dips to 40 fps in towns shouldn't the 2060 beat my old build? this game looks stunning to me btw I watched further on frame generation is probably helping me alot here, glad it exists
Can you do tests of CPU's? I'm looking for a core i9 9900k with a gpu that allows me to play in epic 60-120fps (60fps in the npcs areas). I wanna upgrade my machine and I9 9900k is the best cpu I can change to, and I don't know what is the best GPU that matches with that core to play this well in epic
To me, Stalker 2 looks a lot like 'Medieval Dynasty' in terms of graphics quality (especially on lower settings), and this game is built in UE4, but it runs infinitely better. Except in Medieval Dynasty you can interact with a lot more things in the environment. Seriously, the place is littered with rocks and branches, mushrooms, flowers you can pick up, trees you can chop, some simulated wildlife and NPC routines and so on... it runs on an old quad core, maybe even some better dual cores and doesn't need a beefy GPU either. The UE5 performance is really bad, and it hurts sales as well, considering how expensive hardware is these days.
Yhea, obviously I was just asking at him it was have seen some strange model on the web because there a lot of strange think on the pc world 😅, btw nice video and thanks to showing how real this unoptimized game run, probably the rtx 2060 is almost the minimum gpu apart from the awful vram issue.
Half tempted to find out how well my old 5700xt will do with a 10700 Intel chip lol. Runs fucking great on my 2.7 panel with a 5900x and 6900xt. Granted, probably better than what most people have at home. Asking for a 3080 or 6800xt for good quality is a tall order lol. Not to mention the 32 gigs of ram. I’m glad I future proofed my pc.
Sometimes if you switch res game just starts to perform better (but some graphic settings are breaking and it looks worse), this is what happened with 1440
I think it’s more a maybe amd CPU Problem that u have that much stutter. Cus I got an Intel CPU and people with also Intel CPU are having no problems. Could u maybe try Intel system?
Makes a 3060 12GB Black, look like an interesting proposition 👀 4070 stuff at 1440p on high tops out around 80-130fps with the occasional low of 45 Gets a bit choccy when loading into a new area although it's shuffling through 140GB of data whereas GTA5 was what 50GB for 1080p This makes me think despite ssd's are faster these days, they ain't ready to be stalked Took me 3hrs this evening to get from 1 base to another Eventually got in by sneaking around the side then avoiding conflict by ducking with the light off then stay out of view. A few obligatory head shots were then required which I haven't yet survived 😂 Game on tomorrow ➡️
So for modern games it seems like we are going to have a min spec of 4060/7600 XT/ A770 if you want to play at 30Fps Med 1080p Native settings... I was gonna get it but i do not think my GTX 970 will handle it because it is 150% less powerful than the 4060...
I dont get it I have a 2080 super with an i7 10700k but I dont even get 60 fps on medium 1080p and in that village area its like 30-35,is it a cpu issue maybe the i7 is bad?
And for those older gpus its fine... The game is new, uses a brand new engine, no one can expect that the game runs on an old gpu which is like 6 years old on high settings at best in 1440 or even 4k... People need to understand that there is a reason that old tech stuff dont hold up forever. I went through that shit last year with my 980. I could run games on ultra low and lower Resolution... I needed to upgrade, thats it. Be happy that it runs at all, on low-med lsettings.....
Hey krizzp, i am playing this game on 1080p epic settings I am getting around 40-50 fps My specs are: rx 6600 i3 12th gen But the 1% low are terrible like -60 fps😂 How can i get rid of that? Or can you do a video with RX 6600
My 3060 12gb works pretty well especially with dlss and fsr …without it I get about 50 fps on medium and with it I get consistent 100 fps or more depending on the environment. Of course there’s still a lot of bugs and kinks that need to be worked out like any game recently launched
I've been thinking and I've come to the conclusion that it's not the devs who are optimizing the game poorly, it's the graphics engine that's ruining everything. Don't you think it's strange that all the games with UR5 come out with poor performance? Likewise, there's the example of RE4 remake and Silent Hills 2. RE4 is graphically better and despite that, you can play it without problems in high graphics at 60fps on a 2060s, while in Silent Hills the graphic die even in low graphics.
3060 mobile can do the work too but downside is that crazy memory leak that slows things down to a crawl that needs fixing, otherwise I can still enjoy Stalker 2 even at low settings with the laptop and some adjustments.
![ROSÉ (로제) - number one girl [더 시즌즈-이영지의 레인보우] | KBS 241129 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A9oByH9Ci24/mqdefault.jpg)
Stutter 2 : Lag of Chernobyl
Thats cuz of maxed out vram, not surprised with 6gb...outdated cards nowadays
@@ΓιώργοςΔουλγερίδης-ι6δ??????????????
It's actually the unreal engine garbage engine.
@@ΓιώργοςΔουλγερίδης-ι6δ Αρε γιωργαρα πες τα
@@ΓιώργοςΔουλγερίδης-ι6δ are u out ur mind? that card is well above minimum requirements and textures which uses most vram is set to low, I've never seen a game dropping fps to single digits in RTX 2060 at 1080P medium/low settings with DLSS ever before
the biggest anomaly of STALKER 2 is... STALKER 2 itself
Typical UE5 experience.
No, i have never seen single digit on every other UE5 games unless they play at inappropiate settings
Fortnite are also on ue5
I am able to rock a solid 55fps in wukong at 1440p but this game at 1080 does this shit? yeah not a UE5 issue pal
@@tealchief yeah, i have laptop with this gpu (115 watt), and wukong is totally playlable and run way better than this, this game barely playlable unlike wukong
@@tealchief i know this from that free Benchmark tool
Rtx 2060 is still an okay option for budget GPUs, it still kicks (crazy to say that some rtx cards arent enough for newer titles nowadays)
If someobe can get the 12gig version then their set.
It's not crazy at all! A 6-year-old budget GPU from 2018 not running the latest next-gen games with high FPS isn't crazy.
You can usually buy an RX 6600 for the same money which is 8GB and does better in modern games.
this looks worse than the series s, the series s is garbage
if anyone thinking of getting a RTX2060 as an upgrade,,,, go for the 2060 super, it has 8GB VRAM and faster on core clock
I just watxhed the rx 580 video, refreshed the screen, and this was here. much love sir.
This is what happens when developers choose a generic engine rather than an optimised in house engine built for the game.
Making your own engine is not for everyone especially keeping up with because if a problem comes about fixing its way harder then say unreal or unity because if the developer can't figure it out then you are out of luck especially for pc because as developer you actually much rather develop for something that hardware and software doesn't change that's why most developers can fix bugs faster on say console than pc
@@footballtalk4857 Yeah but we havent seen anything good come out from unreal engine, newer titles are all problematic.
Good is very subjective because others have found games good or even great it just depends on your type of game style unreal engine is not good for everything but it a great tool for things the help developers and tech them things you won't learn in a engine built for one company
What you mean, Remnant 2 is made with unreal engine 5 and it came out flawless. It's just depends on the parameters and optimization of the game.
I mean not these guys. GSC are not a good developer and never have been one. They delayed the game for TWO AND A HALF YEARS and its still this problematic and mediocre. And not everyone remembers this, but the first game was also delayed for like four years and it also came out in a terrible state. I would not trust these developers to make their own engine, let alone a good one.
Glad you are still trying the 2060 cause that's what i use but seeing this i realize i need to upgrade. Sadly my country is entering an economic crisis so i'll have to hold onto it for now
what country is that?
Same here bro about everyting, rtx 2060, economy and all
@@zlyasser1208argentina
@@zlyasser1208 yea what country? UK?
@@pin00chprobably Argentina
This game is the problem, not our beloved graphics cards!
because ukraininans did it
the game is amazing, no problem there. the bugs and optimization is the problem. and the developers are from ukraine and have had to deal with bombings and an invasion. use your head before complaining kid
@@Jordanbiggs1473 the only problem is UE5 is quite notorious for being... Well, heavy on resources and he was kinda right on the game being a bit of a problem. Though it's quite impressive they ship it all while dealing with bombings and invasion. Other than that it's an authentic experience to the OG stalker.
Game looks great, issues, sure, but it's also a mid-range card from nearly 6 years ago. Be realistic. The cards older than the pandemic lol.
@@Jordanbiggs1473 the developers moved to Czech Republic a year ago or something like that
I will never understand how this game manages to look worse than Metro Exodus and run at half the frames on the same hardware.
It’s running on Unreal 5. The developers are at the mercy of the U5 developers for optimisation.
Kinda true
Хуже чем Метро? Лол. Загугли Stalker 2 8k и увидишь обратное )
@@celticgibsondevelopers need stop using that p.o.s game engine.
Developers don't know how to turn off lumen , that is how 😁
When's the RX 6600 benchmark dropping???
Wanna see that 4sure
Fr,I have that card and I wanna know if it runs good
RX 6600 here, Ryzen 7 5700X and 32gb ram, medium preset without motion blur, TAA Native with FG on runs at my monitor refresh rate at 75 fps, sometimes drops to 60-65, but turning on FSR Quality eliminates all frame drops
Haven’t tried higher presets, medium looks and runs great
he did 3060 already and the rx 6600 is normally a bit faster but this game is not optimised for AMD so i would think it will have like 5% less performance
Will bring it tomorrow!
Great vid! 6600 next please!
R 5 5600X + RX6650XT 32gb Ram 3600nhz works great (50-90fps) on high-epic presets/Full HD with fsr+frame generation. Picture is smooth and stable. One time had a fps drop to 15fps (major bug)
@SandWorm. Fsr on?
@@preposterousi yep
I have the exact same GPU, with a Ryzen 5 3600 CPU and 32GB 2666mhz RAM. On medium settings, the game jumps between 25-40 FPS often for me. Once the optimization patches are released, it will be better
Why we dont have any 2080ti benchmarks
Isn’t it sorta like a 3060ti? Plus most of them had memory failures
Cuz he don't have this gpu
@@timmyv148 the 2080ti is way better here mate + it has 11gb of vram not 8 like 3060ti
@@timmyv148no its, well beyond that.
@@kevinerbs2778 it's about 5-15% slower than the 3080 but sometimes more similar depending what's being tested
Thanks for taking us back to 2005😂 I believe that RX 6700 XT will pass the test even on epic settings with FSR and FG🤔
The game was using 26gb of ram yesterday on my pc, after restaring it came back to 17gb, it has major memory leak issues.
No game should run at 6 FPS on RTX 2060 at 1080p what an abomination 💀🙏😭
the 10-20fps thing related to VRAM usage happen to me too with 3080 10gb, idk if the game scale and get memory leak even if you have 3TB VRAM but something messing with the optimization yep, some people think its FG issues but idk, i only have the Nukem mod for framegen so i can assume my thing is not perfect
I'm a UE5 developer and I have experienced this with Data Layers from the World Partition System. It was broken a year ago, i haven't tested it again because I'm now using the old Level Streaming System
The thing is these devs must have assigned to many assets to a single Data Layer (the one that Loads the Town assets), so when entering the town, all the assets are immediately loaded and the fps go crazy
@@WolfgangKrauser1993 I think its that, the devs talk about that for next patch, : Issues and memory allocation failures, which previously caused the game to exit unexpectedly, particularly around rendering, skeletal meshes, and quest-related cutscenes, hopefully that fix the 10-20 (even less) fps thing
I use a rtx 2060 and the game is completely unplayable, no matter what settings i use, it drops to single digit fps at some point. Mostly if you stay for like 5 minutes in a settlement, sometines even when exploring.
Yeah it's the memory leak issue, it's so broken...
@@zWORMzGaming deactivate raytracing, lumen...you can google it how to do this in ini & install the optimized tweaks s2 + stalker 2 optimizer...bam you will have no more stutter...i have a 3060ti but with rtx enabled its bad ;)
10:51 - these are not the stutters! It is an anomaly!
it sad to see rtx 2060 perform like this its a great card normally
It's still a great budget card even after 6 years. But not for UE5, also STALKER2 currently not well optimized.
It's barely enough nowadays.. People need to realize then need to update their hw sometimes..
@@belec5964idk it’s just bad optimization games that almost look the same like rdr2 run 10x better
@@belec5964if only it was as simple as awareness for most people. At least 90% of the games out there will play just fine on a 2060 however. It's only restricted by newly released games that aren't well optimized for the most part.
Rdr 2 looks very good and run well even on my gtx 980 on low- medium setting 60 fps lock most of the time, happy to see that
"We did optimized the game, You just have to buy a new pc".
Just upgraded from this GPU in early October during prime day. I wanted to wait 1 more Generation but I didn't want to deal with these unoptimized games anymore
waiting for RX 5700 XT!
How are your gpu temps so low? I have a galax Rtx 2060 and i mostly get 70 to 74°c. Is the case or some underclocking
i got a 2060 12gb, will the added vram help with some of the issues mentioned in the video?
yes
I will help with textures, but it will not run faster.
Nope...this game has a memory leak issue
Even 10gb of vram is not enough
It also has a ram issue...consuming over 26gb of ram for some reason
2:05 perfect reaction from fima goblin to stutter.
3:41 this also happens in GTA V
Kryzzp's PC gets more action with these GPUs swaps than most of the people watching the videos.
bros been on a gpu test grind, 2 videos per day
thank you for the benchmark❤❤❤❤
HERE WE GO!!! THANKS MANN❤..
You're welcome!! Thanks for watching 😃
@zWORMzGaming Keep going well man🫂♥️
Amazing video!
Will an RTX 4050 laptop paired with an it i5 13420H have similar Performance?
actually 4050 have the same amount of vram -_-
@@lll11l1lll1l2-p they have to patch it, they got the god damn gtx 1060 in minimum requirements, make it work on 6gb gpus you scammers.
slightly better
The only game that truly made a graphical breakthrough was Crysis. The GTX 8800 was barely enough to run it in HD, even in SLI mode. Man, even the facial animations still look superior to what we see in most modern games. At the same time, I think it was well-optimized too, crystal-clear graphics on high settings, rather than relying on features that make the game look like you’re hallucinating..... 🤢
It was only duel thrraded ganw it also came out with s.l.i suppoort.
The mGPU games play way better than older s l.i or cf games on dual gpu setups.
It sucks that developers won't bother implimenting mGPU to game that depratrly need it.
Chernobylite supports running two rtx 4090 in mGPU with drive 566.
Nothing will ever beat the video of the last GPU tested for this game. Pure cinema ✋ 😯 🤚🤣🤣
Sad to look at the results but thank you for continuing to benchmark this card
i hear alot of people complaining about the game glitching and lagging. Im running my game with maxed out settings and while simultaneously streaming for my buddy on discord and i havent had any lag at all. The biggest glitch ive seen is the guy pissing himself while standing up. Maybe im lucky but the games is running practically flawlessly for me so far. I do have a fairly beefy pc but ive heard people with similar pcs claim they can barely run the game which confuses me.
All i can say is the game is great for me and im glad cause its some of the most fun ive had in gaming in recent years
Happy i moved to my RX6750 XT in 6 months after the RTX 2060 6gig HOWEVER the RTX 2060 is a great card for gamers playing older games.
I moved from a 2060 to my current 7700xt and I love it
And 1060 is even more great for playing more older games
@foxskyful No id not go lower then a RX6600/RTX 2060 even for older games at 1080p
@@foxskyful 1060 used to be a King but its time for it to rest.
Unreal Engine 5 is the worst thing happened to videogame industry.
Hello zWORMz, will you do review on rtx 4050?
Definitely waiting before starting a new playthrough
Much love from South Africa!! Please do the GTX 1080🙌
already been
@@VoltwallOn Stalker 2??
Hey. I have the same GPU but with 16Gb of ram, you think I could still play the game without those aweful drops and still have some graphical fidelity ?
Cool stuff m8
hey are you considering the gtx 1660 super ?
even though I think it will be even more broken XD
do the RX6600 next pls
Yeah :)
Can you test rx6600?
Coming next!
2:20 straight ahead, slightly to your left you can see a guy t posing going backwards into that building. Never change S.T.A.L.K.E.R 🤣🤣
The VRAM is being overwhelmed so much, I can feel it in the back of my eye holes.
I was a Nvidia fan, but after seeing their greed in recent times decided to change to AMD. Can't be happier. For 200$ I got a great deal for a rx6800. Those 16gb of VRAM really makes you not worry about going out of memory. And the performance is great.
Yeah let's fight this terrible engine, these terrible optimized games with "more VRAM". What's gona happen in the next few years? "Oh you idiot, 16GB of VRAM is barely enough for 720p in 2028".
Finally you’ve tested the better 6GB VRAM GPU from nvidia instead of only the GTX 1060. Althrough I still wonder how this same GPU performs in Black Myth Wukong.
While the RTX 2060 is AT LEAST above the minimum requirements it is actually possible to run the game at native 1080p without upscaling on lowest, but seeing how it runs on medium settings was a major disappointment. Even if it has the minimum required VRAM it still should be able to run at least medium settings, right? Well not here sadly. And I seriously hope that the patches could improve the performance.
I tried black myth wukong Benchmark tool on my 2060 laptop (115watt) and it is playlable although not 60 fps unless i use dlss performance. No massive stuttering like this, even with ray tracing
Maybe if you use lowest or custome
Developers of Black Myth know how to turn off lumen.
Stalker 2 will utilize a second graphics card VRAM if it is installed.
fr?
It will utilise all memory in ur pc build, even the ROM)
12:54 I think it depends on what you're used to, if you are a hardcore pc gamer who plays CS2 at 300fps on 240hz and low sensitivity with a zowie or logi wired mouse on a good mousepad, you will be EXTREMELY sensitive to input lag and iffy mouse inputs, Stalker 2 is gonna be a nightmare to you.
Had this experience where I played a section at around 40 fps, reloaded and was stuck at like 17. Reloaded again and was back to 40. Have you had this experience? With a particular gpu? Curious as to what might have caused that. Vram was fine, ram was fine, cpu was fine (under 50, cause ofc)
At least with this game, any graphical artifacts can be called Anomalies and look like part of the game lol. Even floating Bob, it could be radiation making him float :).
I hope the developers do work on this more and get some optimisation done. This game has a lot of potential to be a great game.
Your system lags and freezes because your memory is not configured.
Final settings for RTX 2060 (6GB VRAM): (AMD ryzen 9 7950X3D): (Memory: 16)
r.IoDispatcher.AsyncBatchReadSizeKB=16384
r.IoDispatcher.CacheSize=16384
r.IoDispatcher.MaxParallelIoRequests=64
[SystemSettings]
r.Streaming.PoolSize=4096
r.RenderTargetPoolMin=1024
r.Nanite.Streaming.MaxPendingPages=128
r.EarlyZPass=2
[TextureStreaming]
r.Streaming.MaxTempMemoryAllowed=2048
I have an RTX 4080 laptop and just got the game on Gamepass. Didn't want to spend the $70 right off the bat. Gonna see how it runs. Hopefully 4K Perf DLSS on High settings will be playable
My problem is not the GPU but the CPU. 12 Threads of Haswell-E might below minimum requirements.
Could you test a RTX 3080? Really want to play this game but I'm afraid my personal demands are too high for a 3080
thanks for the benchmark, can you try with 16gb ram ?
There will be plenty of performance and optimization passes for this title down the road though right?
Any chance you can do a test with a weaker CPU? For more of the average gamer with an i5 :)
This game is so busted it became it's own video genre
2060 is still an okay 1080p card, its just the game. it should be illegal for a game requiring a mid range modern gpu to run such a mid looking graphics. i'm sure the 2060 can handle metro exodus in 1080p like a champ and look 100% better
2060 is low gpu and exodus is semi open world game
@@foxskyful it is a mid-low end gpu but it can do mostly 1080p high in 80% of games, and its only about 5 years old. this kind of performance is not acceptable for its age. heck even the 1060 aged better in 2020 than 2060 in 2024
@farhankurniawan7567 No, its low-med at best gpu now. 3060 and 6600xt are mid mid-low. And 1080p is low resolution 1440p is what should be minimum as normal or medium(recommended). 1060 aged well because games didnt progressed that much graphically as usual from 2015 to 2023 one of reasons why people still consider Horizon, RDR2, Witcher 3... One of best loking games even to this day. Games become more and more complex some new things are not very noticeable graphically, but have big impact on performance now also one of main reasons
for having so many bad optimized games and so many other reasons i really cant write all in commnet trying to explain.
Low FPS is the result of weak GPU, not insufficient VRAM size. Insufficient VRAM will appear as distinctive stuttering. E.g. RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB in one place you can roll / turn / doing saltos and FPS will be abound. But it may stutter if you will go with your character far away on the battlefield - thus swapping new textures into VRAM. Or not ?
rtx 3050 6gb maybe slower than rtx 2060 6gb or the same? my/our curiosity remains blank in this supermassive game.
You can mod the game so you can use the DLSS FG in lower series cards. It actually works it's pretty cool.
The game already has FSR FG.
@@Funnky I'm talking about DLSS FG which is better
they launched a 2060 12 gb remember ?? try finding it and compare it
If there was only a way to turn of RayTracing without fuffing up all the lighting, I think a lot of people would've loved it.
do you still have the 6700XT? interested how it performs here
I have a 2060, should i get a 3070 or a 6700 xt?
I play minecraft with shaders and the finals mostly, i like rt but i dont use it all the time and dlss is preferred.
Only thing that worries me is that 8gb
something is not right here i'm running the game on a 1070 ti with a ryzen 5 4500 at 60 fps on medium with taa enabled and fsr frame generation enabled at 1080p and it only dips to 40 fps in towns shouldn't the 2060 beat my old build? this game looks stunning to me btw
I watched further on frame generation is probably helping me alot here, glad it exists
Can you do tests of CPU's? I'm looking for a core i9 9900k with a gpu that allows me to play in epic 60-120fps (60fps in the npcs areas). I wanna upgrade my machine and I9 9900k is the best cpu I can change to, and I don't know what is the best GPU that matches with that core to play this well in epic
To me, Stalker 2 looks a lot like 'Medieval Dynasty' in terms of graphics quality (especially on lower settings), and this game is built in UE4, but it runs infinitely better. Except in Medieval Dynasty you can interact with a lot more things in the environment. Seriously, the place is littered with rocks and branches, mushrooms, flowers you can pick up, trees you can chop, some simulated wildlife and NPC routines and so on... it runs on an old quad core, maybe even some better dual cores and doesn't need a beefy GPU either. The UE5 performance is really bad, and it hurts sales as well, considering how expensive hardware is these days.
can i ask why my 2060 doesnt give the same results ? i cant even get 30fps at 720p constantly
What is the best setting for 4070 super
I hve DLSS+ qulaity all is Epic in display HDR. ARE ON
HELP ME BETTER SETTING
Do you actually finish playing the games you test every year?
One day the rx 6600 turn will come btw it is the most popular amd gpu in steam currently
Wouldnt mind seeing the 1080TI 10GB model.
They exist a 1080ti 10gb model?
I tested the 1080Ti, it's an 11GB card btw!
Yhea, obviously I was just asking at him it was have seen some strange model on the web because there a lot of strange think on the pc world 😅, btw nice video and thanks to showing how real this unoptimized game run, probably the rtx 2060 is almost the minimum gpu apart from the awful vram issue.
The weird thing I found with shadow quality is that having it on High gives me more frames than any other setting.
Rx 6600 gameplay needed stalker 2😢
Half tempted to find out how well my old 5700xt will do with a 10700 Intel chip lol. Runs fucking great on my 2.7 panel with a 5900x and 6900xt. Granted, probably better than what most people have at home. Asking for a 3080 or 6800xt for good quality is a tall order lol. Not to mention the 32 gigs of ram. I’m glad I future proofed my pc.
Sometimes if you switch res game just starts to perform better (but some graphic settings are breaking and it looks worse), this is what happened with 1440
Что такое VRAMA и VRAMU?
I moved my virtual memory to my ssd m.2 and this 10 FPS drops calm down, i don't know why
Crazy to see a 2060 struggle with 1080p medium
I think it’s more a maybe amd CPU Problem that u have that much stutter. Cus I got an Intel CPU and people with also Intel CPU are having no problems. Could u maybe try Intel system?
Makes a 3060 12GB Black, look like an interesting proposition 👀
4070 stuff at 1440p on high tops out around 80-130fps with the occasional low of 45
Gets a bit choccy when loading into a new area although it's shuffling through 140GB of data whereas GTA5 was what 50GB for 1080p
This makes me think despite ssd's are faster these days, they ain't ready to be stalked
Took me 3hrs this evening to get from 1 base to another
Eventually got in by sneaking around the side then avoiding conflict by ducking with the light off then stay out of view. A few obligatory head shots were then required which I haven't yet survived 😂
Game on tomorrow ➡️
So for modern games it seems like we are going to have a min spec of 4060/7600 XT/ A770 if you want to play at 30Fps Med 1080p Native settings... I was gonna get it but i do not think my GTX 970 will handle it because it is 150% less powerful than the 4060...
I'm one of the crazy people who thinks that the input delay from 30 to 60FPS Framegen is not that bad
Good for u I guess that means it will help u the most I'm fine with 50 base fps maybe 45
I dont get it I have a 2080 super with an i7 10700k but I dont even get 60 fps on medium 1080p and in that village area its like 30-35,is it a cpu issue maybe the i7 is bad?
And for those older gpus its fine... The game is new, uses a brand new engine, no one can expect that the game runs on an old gpu which is like 6 years old on high settings at best in 1440 or even 4k...
People need to understand that there is a reason that old tech stuff dont hold up forever. I went through that shit last year with my 980. I could run games on ultra low and lower Resolution... I needed to upgrade, thats it.
Be happy that it runs at all, on low-med lsettings.....
Hey krizzp, i am playing this game on 1080p epic settings
I am getting around 40-50 fps
My specs are:
rx 6600
i3 12th gen
But the 1% low are terrible like -60 fps😂
How can i get rid of that? Or can you do a video with RX 6600
7:27 Never tried 900p or 768p? 🥺
Hello, can you do a RTX 4060 laptop? Test.
My 3060 12gb works pretty well especially with dlss and fsr …without it I get about 50 fps on medium and with it I get consistent 100 fps or more depending on the environment. Of course there’s still a lot of bugs and kinks that need to be worked out like any game recently launched
I've been thinking and I've come to the conclusion that it's not the devs who are optimizing the game poorly, it's the graphics engine that's ruining everything. Don't you think it's strange that all the games with UR5 come out with poor performance? Likewise, there's the example of RE4 remake and Silent Hills 2. RE4 is graphically better and despite that, you can play it without problems in high graphics at 60fps on a 2060s, while in Silent Hills the graphic die even in low graphics.
3060 mobile can do the work too but downside is that crazy memory leak that slows things down to a crawl that needs fixing, otherwise I can still enjoy Stalker 2 even at low settings with the laptop and some adjustments.
witch FOV u use on this benchmark?
Xbox Series X KINGS like me getting crazy shimmering and 30~34fps lording over the Series S peasantry 🧐
Hoping For More Mini PC And The Asus Laptop Benchmarks
1080p wont even run well due to vram, why bother higher resolutions?