Not sure I'm sticking with the headline long-term, but since it's there now, some additional "truth" for you folks: - T-Mobile is *also* building out 5G in the high-band mmWave space (it already has the beginnings of such a network underway in Las Vegas and LA, among other places). - Its 600MHz deployment (which I test in this video) is built on spectrum it acquired in 2017. It's had LTE deployed there for a while, and has also had all that time to prepare for this 5G rollout, hence the "switch flip" moment. - Not all sites have been upgraded with the 5G equipment. When your phone connects to a specific T-Mo cell site using the 600MHz band, the site can indicate to the handset whether or not it's so equipped. If so, the phone switches the network indicator to "5G" to let you know that connection is available. If not, it stays put at 4GLTE. - The rollout, as with all carriers, is continuous. Expect coverage to increase, but expect speeds to remain about the same due to the limitations of low-band frequencies discussed in the video. More here: www.androidcentral.com/5g-t-mobile-everything-you-need-know
Let's be honest, The MrMobile Channel seems to hold the best 5G Coverage on RUclips to date. Keep it up Michael, really appreciate this honest, unbiased and independent content.
Ha! Thanks man, though I'm sorry to hear it! Did you have a 5G UWB device, even? David and I had to borrow ours from Qualcomm. Great seeing you out there.
@@gcarter1973 Ok, let me just give you the full run-down because you just seem completely misinformed. First 5G, like 4G and every generation before it operates in the microwave band of the electromagnetic spectrum so at broadcasting power levels, the most dangerous it could be is in the form of heat. Second, mmWave does not penetrate solid objects so now the worst it could be is on the surface level of the skin (The sun's infrared rays don't cause cancer yet they're at a frequency of 300 Ghz - 200 Thz ). Third, if you're talking about the 600 Mhz spectrum, this was already used for century's with UHF TV so the exposure wouldn't be any realistic difference compared to now. Fourth, microwaves aren't even efficient at creating heat, this is why a 1800 watt microwave only puts out 1000 watts of microwave energy. And lastly, the studies that show damage by microwaves included: A, Incredibly long exposure time to the site. B, Situations where you'd be standing still directly next to a tower. C, the mmWave sites run at a MUCH lower power level since they're closer together. Although, none of this directly relates to cancer in any way. The worst situations that have occurred is in a school where a 4G tower was placed directly overhead which is just a completely wrong move. This situation lead to heating the brain directly, which led to tumors (Non-cancerous tumors caused by heat and not DNA damage, however naturally tumors can mutate and become cancerous on their own.) And this can only happen with lower frequencies that have actual penetration like the 2.4Ghz-3.4Ghz bands. mmWave is not able to penetrate the skull. But that's it, it's just heat and it works the same way any other band does like the Sun, quartz heaters, and many other types of heat that is radiated, only possible difference is that infrared has to short of a wavelength to penetrate the skull, which the longer waves of infrared are actually completely capable of, and our bodies radiate this type of heat 24/7 naturally. So all in all, yes under absolutely ridiculous circumstances it's "Possible" for microwaves to be dangerous but don't forget that your microwave oven operates at a far higher power level and that isn't even capable of genetic damage at the frequency of 2.45 Ghz. Hopefully, this clears up anything you were misinformed on, have a good one.
Common sense it’s better to have slower speeds with a good stable connection with more coverage than faster speeds and no coverage having to stand directly next to a tower.
T-Mobile is doing it the right way. They're not rushing to have the high bandwidth 5G out first they're improving upon the 4G infrastructure they already have and releasing 5G in waves.
@@ShadmanAhmed1 It's tempting to think so, but I disagree. I take my cues from Sascha Segan at PCMag when it comes to this stuff, since he's one of the best resources for wireless network knowledge I know. His take: "In my view, 5G is a technology that can enable experiences, but it doesn't always do so. It's a radio system called 5G NR, which supports very wide channels and has a rich roadmap for future improvement. By that measure, T-Mobile's low-band 5G is definitely 5G and AT&T's 5GE is not." www.pcmag.com/news/372378/testing-t-mobiles-low-band-5g-lets-call-it-4-9g
This needs to go for most corporations in a lot of areas. Figure out what need is being fulfilled and focus on that. We're out here with copy cat phones, cars, food, ect. Substance always wins
Let's be honest, The MrMobile Channel seems to hold the best 5G Coverage on RUclips to date. Keep it up Michael, really appreciate this honest, unbiased and independent content.
4G is plenty fast, its faster than most peoples home internet connection. Who needs more than 50-100mbps on a cell phone? Would rather have cell companies deploy more 4G for better coverage than waste time on this crap that no one will notice.
@@ILoveGrilledCheese no im not, no one needs 5g to browse facebook and upload to instagram. 5g is good for getting broadband to people who can't get it another way, but for strictly mobile use, its a waste unless they can get it to have better range and no line of sight issues.
mmWave 5G service is a joke. You won't get any reception inside your home on that bandwidth. So you will never get those download / upload speeds and 1-6 ms ping latency.
@@tmr8193 1000gb? I think you mean 1000 mbps. Also, it's not fiber optic. It's cable over coaxial. The one that is fiber optic that is offered by Xfinity is the 2000 mbps plan. (Gigabit Pro)
@@amnottabs that makes more sense. I had an original iPhone and an iPhone 4 before switching to Android to save money. They were pretty great phones. I think people blow things like "antenna-gate" way out of proportion.
@uwu manko I mean technically it is 5G technology, so they aren't lying on that front. But the advertising I agree with you; they are really exaggerating a bit with their promises of much faster speeds.
I have Verizon for the last 10 years I work in a kitchen my brother is a executive chef. We both have Verizon we do not get any signal at all whatsoever while inside of the kitchen we have to step outside sometimes even outside of the building. we noticed that people that had T-Mobile had signal inside of the kitchen in the break room like wtf! We have switched over to T-Mobile after almost eleven years of being with Verizon. I get signal in places that I normally didn't get with Verizon. This has been my experience
3:50 - "More often than not, when I looked up at the status bar, it was a 5G indicator glowing back at me" Unfortunately the display of a 5G icon doesn't always mean your phone is actually on 5G.
@uwu manko doubt it, there's no reason it shouldnt he approved. You need to open your eyes and take a closer look on who is the real bad guy here. All the states left suing are liberals and liberals want to prevent anything good from happening to America unless it benefits their wallet and back pocket That's the truth manko
2016: 5G is here! Us: it's not ready yet 2017: 5G is here! Us: it's not ready yet 2018: 5G is here! Us again: it's not ready yet 2019: 5G is here! Us: still not ready 2020: 6G is here! Us: wait wat
@@EarAche123 I love to live in future 😃 I have read about quick charge tech way in 2011. I have also read a Stanford journal in 2012 where battery charge was stored in Aluminium plates which can hold charge much longer and charge in seconds.not sure what happened to that.
Currently, most 5G rollouts are using NSA, meaning nonstandalone so 4G is still used for singaling even when phone is connected to 5G for data. Anyway, there aren't nearly any 5G phone you can buy beside few flaghips, like 1 or 2 high mid priced phones from Chinese companies?
It's not really hard to understand, I would rather have more coverage with good speed and connection than high speed and no connection, Verizon is clueless imo.
Verizon’s 4g network is already faster and has better coverage than T-Mobile’s 5g network so it actually makes sense for them to focus on getting the highest speeds.
The greatness of 5G will be combining all low and high frequencies depending on the case. Only 600Mhz won't give you much, but combine 600Mhz with other sub 6Ghz bands and you have great speeds and coverage everywhere. And mmWave will be awesome for crowded places like train stations and busy streets.
Not sure what the T-Mobile and Sprint merger would do. When I start driving north after a bit my signal drops 4G and goes to unusable 3G. This is on GoogleFi which is both TMobile and Sprint. I'm thinking of going to Spectrum Mobile, which is Verizon. Would rather have working 4G and super fast 5G than "meh" 5G and no 4G. Here's the million dollar question. Will the 600mhz 5G put signal out there where there's no 4G?
Great video. I'm a retired Coast Guard Communications Officer and have been following the transition from 4G to 5G. Uunfortunately, T-Mo has zero 5G covereage anywhere near the mid-Atlanic except DC. I forwarded this video to several friends & family because even non-tech types will understand the way you explained the current state of 5G.
When T-Mobile first started upgrading their towers it was suppose to be faster 4g then out of no where changed the name to 5g . Sounds like a marketing tactic
How much editing / color correcting was done to the McLaren's video output here? Seems very saturated, almost in a Samsung-from-a-few-years-ago sort of way.
None. That's, erm, sadly ... just what OnePlus does to colors. (Actually that's not quite fair: it's a byproduct of what color space OnePlus is using ... so you can indeed correct for it if you have the editing expertise to do so, as Danny Winget has told me). But out of the camera ... that's what it looks like. It wasn't fun to cut that in with the Fuji and iPhone footage, I tell ya. Blurgh.
Verstand the Oneplus video is outputting colors in Rec 2020 which is considered HDR to a certain extent and the colors are not adjusted to back to Rec 709 on export which are the colors we are used to that’s why it’s so saturated. You can convert the colors in an editor like Final Cut Pro and the colors look amazing. Check out my OnePlus 7 Pro 4K camera samples video if you want to see what they look like with the color space adjusted.
Completely disagree with the Sprint/TMobile merger argument. They had the same argument with the ATT/TMobile merger in 2011, that it would speed up 4G deployment; sure it may have, but in the long run it would hurt prices. I mean look what happened in the end, in the 8 years proceeding that argument, we have 4G almost everywhere now with TMobile being able to reduce prices industry wide to compete. Now the whole "Oh woe is me, Sprint can't survive without TMobile.", is a whole other bag of dogshit. The CEO of SoftBank sent an email in 2017 that said he was willing to eat all of sprints debt if he needed to, so it's another lie.
That Camera Sample you used from the OnePlus is exactly the reason I’ll never buy one again. It’s like OnePlus thinks it’s alright to dial the saturation up to 300% and call it a day. 2:25
Mark Shan I have an iPhone 6S with a cell tower right behind my house so I have full bars. I usually get about 50 Mbps. I’d probably get slightly better speeds with a newer phone.
@@SalivatingSteve Weird. Maybe it's because there are less people in Canada. I remember my sister getting around 100 with an iphone 4 when it first released
@@imcrazyforwar We are. It's like back in the mid 90s when laptops had IR blasters to share data but needed a perfectly lined up setup and still probably, wouldn't work
TMobile launched on dec 6th... it's the 12th. Just like 4g LTE took time to deploy and get enhancements, 5g will be the same. I see tons of comments saying it's fake and not worth it etc... it will get better, especially with the merger once its approved officially. Patience is a good thing in most cases
Brandon Y I’m still using iPhone X and still works perfectly but I’m not again that replace phone every time the new one get released. So if I want to use for a long term maybe I should phone with more new feature rather than additional one camera.
@@ShibaScience Australia is really quite big and most of it is barely inhabited. It's only really worth the networks' time and money investing in the urban areas there (plus a healthy dose of taking their customers for a ride).
@@tams805 I mean, sure. But the US is pretty big too and they were able to cover the entire county in a short amount of time. Though you make a valid point that the environment for both is completely different, so I understand why it may be difficult to do that.
Theres lots of coverage in area where theres a good population (even 5g in main cities) but rural/country areas are not great at all. They’re working on it, but with a population less than 30million, in a country the size of the USA, service covering every part of Australia wouldn’t be financially sustainable. Wont be long and Elon Musk’s internet project will see everyone using voIP calls when its up n running.
Thanks for explaining the different levels of signal between Verizon and T-Mobile. That actually explains why sometimes I have signal in the offices I work in (I'm with T-Mobile) and why sometimes my friend's phone with Verizon doesn't have signal. But also thank you for explaining all tech is such a great simple way that even someone who isn't that much of a tech person, they can understand it. Keep up the great work! I always enjoy your tech videos.
It will eventually be real slow as the amount of data being transferred goes beyond the ability for 4G. It’s the same thing that happened with 3G when 4G being widely adopted.
Thank you so much for being one of the few reviewers who gives the big picture and real world experience. Longwave 5G may not be much faster, but I'm led to believe it'll be much less prone to slowdowns due to the number of users on the system.
I wonder if people who buy 5G capable devices now to use with this low band 5G will be able to use the same devices with Ultra Wide Band once they roll that out. Or is Ultra Wide Band aka millimeter wave a Verizon thing only?
TMobile's 4G rollout was similar. I was among the first of my friends in my small Missouri town to have 4G, but most of my friends' 3G was only slightly slower. Over time the 4G got good though. I'm hopeful 5G goes the same way.
This is really blowing my shit like yes TMobile has more coverage but as stated in the video 5g phones generally cost hundreds more than their 4g counter parts but they haven't solved anything this changes nothing They merge get Sprint's towers now they advantage of coverage not speed yes it's a new standard and eventually speed will increase but I could say the same about Verizon's service Eventually 5g coverage will improve- Verizon This pushes the problem for later not solves it basically TMobile announced that they going overall boost their 4g and then eventually increase it as time goes on
War Head - True; which is why I'm not rushing into 5G. It's where 4G was when it was first deployed. (Both AT&T and Verizon are cannibalizing 3G to deploy 5G - which T-Mobile had already done. There is an article on Android Authority that explains this.)
Perhaps this is not about speed, perhaps this is about the internet of things, surveillance capitalism in the first stages then evolving with the rise of China as a major global power into a dystopic world ruled by a technocratic -communist elite.
@@jasatx2024 well that was always the stated goal 5g is expected to bring the iot but the complaint is more about the bliant push of the tech that solves nothing or is so beta is barely exist to do anything with especially when u factor in price of plans and/or devices going up for no real reason not even considering how bad current plans/coverage is in the states
For me I switched to T-Mobile for the future of what it can be capable of . So hopefully it was the smart move. At this point... this reminds me of what LTE was like when first deployed. Great video tho! And thank you!
Brian Clemons - I switched to T-Mobile's network (I'm a Tracfone customer - which supports both carrier networks, and provides US $1.00 network switching that you can do yourself) because I was changing phones (from the Galaxy Nexus to the S7); said S7 was an ex-Verizon phone that was network-locked (which meant that taking it to Verizon was a non-starter). The S7's SoC was a generic SoC from Qualcomm (one of the first such) and only needed new firmware (ODIN to the rescue). Once I got the replacement SIM from doing the network-swap, that and a firmware download via ODIN and I was off to the races. I'm not new to T-Mobile's network, as Tracfone is not the only MVNO that uses, or has used, their network - remember Virgin Mobile (now part of Metro - T-Mobile's in-house prepaid arm)? I pounded Virgin Mobile rather viciously - mostly due to their phone choice; all the S7 swap did was make said pounding make even MORE sense - I went from swearing AT T-Mobile's network to swearing BY it (I recommend T-Mobile's network today - and especially if you are on an MVNO that can leverage it), and it has exactly squat to do with 5G. (Other MVNOs that do - or can - leverage T-Mobile's network include Wal-Mart Mobile and Consumer Cellular.)
I guess it all depends on location. My brother has Verizon and I have T-Mobile , my phone is faster than his phone about 70% of the time where live. One of my friends got the McLaren last month and it's almost twice as fast as my phone on average. I guess It just means T-Mobile has focused more on my area
Depends on area. I have sprint and at certain areas in town my LTE speeds have topped 100mbps. Blew my mind. Maxed out at 116 lol Wish I could get some of that at home. At home I'm lucky to get 1 mbps with sprint. Moving soon so shouldn't be too much of an issue longer
Just did a 4G speed test. 130 Mbps down, 26.2 Mbps up. I'm on T-Mobile (Pixel 4XL) so I wonder if I'd notice much of a difference. Probably not worth rushing out to get a new phone for yet. However, it would be nice if they started offering affordable home internet options with the 5G rollout. I'd get rid of comcast in a second if it was good.
Verizon's LTE Advanced can get almost 200mbs down. I have tested it at 184 in Williamsburg, Virginia. The lowest I tested was about 160. So much for T-Mobile's 5G that isn't even as fast as Verizon's LTE Advanced.
Max I could pull on T-Mo's roof node in this video was 270 down, so given a proper network deployment (and low demand) 5G on sub-6 is still a substantial improvement. Of course, those are ideal circumstances.
@@TheMrMobile that's not bad. T-Mobile are doing good by using lower bands that can actually cover places other than downtown streets in large cities and stadiums. I think good reliable 5G is still at least 2 years away.
Ah, Maui. It was absolutely beautiful in 1985, before more construction was done to entice an increase in tourism! With the mountainous terrain on all of the islands, it's a miracle 5g would work consistently in every location on each island.
THANK YOU for saving me $900 dollars. I was going to buy my wife the 7T pro as a gift, until I saw your video. Last year I bought a new phone that has an octacore, (dual processors at 2.2 MHz), 128 gig memory, and 6 gigs of ram, dual rear cameras and a front camera for around $200.00. I am happy. I will buy her one like that, and wait 5 yrs.
Having 2000 mbps over 100-200 mbps cool, until you don't realize, that it's like having your mum packing 1000 sandwiches in your lunchbox each day, instead of only 50 or a 100 sandwiches. They are just sandwiches. They are good for the moment, but after a while, they are not. And it's not like anybody is buying them. So you don’t end up using them!
Ivo Ovcharov Exactly my home Internet is 100 mbps which is already really fast. My phone gets about 50 mbps which is still good. My phone has a 720p screen so I’m not streaming 4K, I don’t get the need for 1000mbps bandwidth on a phone. They’ll put up a data cap anyway
Dominic are you not aware 5G is WEAPONS GRADE TECH. Wake up bud. You think these companies are spending billions so you can download 1/4 second faster?! I feel sorry for you and your children if you do.
Dominick Brewer it’s not rocket science on how frequencies work were just stating the more demand of fast cell data will bring more consequences than good. That’s all
@@rwhite4728 Can you back up that statement please? Microwaves aren't even ionizing so how could it damage DNA. You should be more afraid of the sun because it produces every wavelength on the electromagnetic spectrum (granted anything that is UV gets through the atmosphere) and guess what!? You are surrounded by UV rays which is way worse on so many levels which IS a type of ionizing radiation! If you're so scared of photons why don't you just hide in some sort of lead box with your stupid looking tinfoil hat!? Oh wait! You emit photons too believe it or not and good luck getting all of that lead! Do your research pal.
Yep. There are no safe test results at all. No independent testing has been done. It's been launched where I live as a testbed & we're ill with radiation symptoms, as are our pets. There are court cases going on at the minute. I don't know why anyone would want this. People who are interested can checkout Barrie Trower's videos. Ex Royal Navy Weapons Expert. The Sasha Stone 5g movie is also informative.
Most people will not need it. Most people don’t need a car that goes from zero to 60 in less than three seconds. Why pay $60K on a Cadillac or Lexus when you can buy a Toyota or Nissan at half that cost?
@@mariaevora2142 What he is saying is all conspiracy. I've spoke to two physicist and hopefully soon about to hear from a NASA physicist. Crowd control is nonsense and 5g waves are non ionizing which means that they cannot pierce through the human body or any other life forms. Dont brainwash yourself with the wrong material. Even scientists like him get proven wrong.
I am a Moto Z3 user (bite me) who lives in a very rural area that Verizon has almost to itself. The 4G LTE is as reliable as one could ask for within immediate city/township limits, but drops to 3G 2-3 miles out then dies beyond that. I'd be shocked to see Verizon 5G showing up within 5 years here, since current 5G tech requires all those repeaters above streets to keep the signal going. Fine in urban areas mostly, utterly impractical in rural areas. Also, so much of this 5G tech currently on the market won't make it to halfway before newer protocols/infrastructure are in place, hence my trepidation to buy that 5G Moto Mod. It's like getting a slot car for Xmas without the track. Not too much fun.
The low band is cool for coverage even in villages far away, but they could have stick with LTE... Better release some 5G cells at 3,5 GHz, for better speeds and average coverage.
I get 100+ mbps on Tmobile 4G LTE, but their hotspot speed is only 0.5 mbps which really sucks unless you pay an extra $15 to get 4G speeds but that's only on the first 20GB of data.
Here’s the update you need: Beside the faster speed, the actually benefit of 5G is to alleviate the effect of congestion. For example, if you’re at the airport, 4G will get really slow because it’s congested. But if you’re on 5G, you can get atleast usuable speed.
![MrMobile [Michael Fisher]](http://yt3.ggpht.com/Bf8B_79jyHxP6CVnjV5WKws93l9Vxlk0d7aPmcBygTBDKzgsGrpazdJRFUrfg1sUNlo8YX8rji8=s48-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj)
Not sure I'm sticking with the headline long-term, but since it's there now, some additional "truth" for you folks:
- T-Mobile is *also* building out 5G in the high-band mmWave space (it already has the beginnings of such a network underway in Las Vegas and LA, among other places).
- Its 600MHz deployment (which I test in this video) is built on spectrum it acquired in 2017. It's had LTE deployed there for a while, and has also had all that time to prepare for this 5G rollout, hence the "switch flip" moment.
- Not all sites have been upgraded with the 5G equipment. When your phone connects to a specific T-Mo cell site using the 600MHz band, the site can indicate to the handset whether or not it's so equipped. If so, the phone switches the network indicator to "5G" to let you know that connection is available. If not, it stays put at 4GLTE.
- The rollout, as with all carriers, is continuous. Expect coverage to increase, but expect speeds to remain about the same due to the limitations of low-band frequencies discussed in the video.
More here: www.androidcentral.com/5g-t-mobile-everything-you-need-know
nice Mrmobile....
It will come with the merger of Sprint it will acciure all of sprints mid band which will give speeds around 200 to 250 Mbps can't wait😁
@@mikechilders5898 Yep, mentioned in the video (wish I'd been able to see that cake that Myriam Joire took a photo of!)
Let's be honest, The MrMobile Channel seems to hold the best 5G Coverage on RUclips to date.
Keep it up Michael, really appreciate this honest, unbiased and independent content.
@@TheMrMobile I was born and raised on Maui I live on the big island now
I didn't even get a single second of mmWave 5G while out there, so count yourself lucky 🤣 Great video!
Ha! Thanks man, though I'm sorry to hear it! Did you have a 5G UWB device, even? David and I had to borrow ours from Qualcomm. Great seeing you out there.
Why not mention how dangerous 5G can be?
G Cart It’s not dangerous
@@brandon_nope 100 % it's dangerous.
@@gcarter1973 Ok, let me just give you the full run-down because you just seem completely misinformed. First 5G, like 4G and every generation before it operates in the microwave band of the electromagnetic spectrum so at broadcasting power levels, the most dangerous it could be is in the form of heat. Second, mmWave does not penetrate solid objects so now the worst it could be is on the surface level of the skin (The sun's infrared rays don't cause cancer yet they're at a frequency of 300 Ghz - 200 Thz ). Third, if you're talking about the 600 Mhz spectrum, this was already used for century's with UHF TV so the exposure wouldn't be any realistic difference compared to now. Fourth, microwaves aren't even efficient at creating heat, this is why a 1800 watt microwave only puts out 1000 watts of microwave energy. And lastly, the studies that show damage by microwaves included: A, Incredibly long exposure time to the site. B, Situations where you'd be standing still directly next to a tower. C, the mmWave sites run at a MUCH lower power level since they're closer together. Although, none of this directly relates to cancer in any way. The worst situations that have occurred is in a school where a 4G tower was placed directly overhead which is just a completely wrong move. This situation lead to heating the brain directly, which led to tumors (Non-cancerous tumors caused by heat and not DNA damage, however naturally tumors can mutate and become cancerous on their own.) And this can only happen with lower frequencies that have actual penetration like the 2.4Ghz-3.4Ghz bands. mmWave is not able to penetrate the skull. But that's it, it's just heat and it works the same way any other band does like the Sun, quartz heaters, and many other types of heat that is radiated, only possible difference is that infrared has to short of a wavelength to penetrate the skull, which the longer waves of infrared are actually completely capable of, and our bodies radiate this type of heat 24/7 naturally. So all in all, yes under absolutely ridiculous circumstances it's "Possible" for microwaves to be dangerous but don't forget that your microwave oven operates at a far higher power level and that isn't even capable of genetic damage at the frequency of 2.45 Ghz. Hopefully, this clears up anything you were misinformed on, have a good one.
Common sense it’s better to have slower speeds with a good stable connection with more coverage than faster speeds and no coverage having to stand directly next to a tower.
even better to not spend money on technology that either won't work or won't be any better than what you already have.
@@BronzeLincolns81 KINDA LIKE HAVING A USED CAR WITH FULL FUEL TANK COMPARED TO BRAND NEW LUXURY EXOTIC CAR WITH NO FUEL LOL
Nah, they'll just boost that signal till our innards boil. 🤣
Yeah that’s why it makes sense for Verizon to go fast with no connection because they already have the fastest 4g that’s faster than T-Mobile’s 5g
joseph bodden funny analogy 👏 😆
T-Mobile is doing it the right way. They're not rushing to have the high bandwidth 5G out first they're improving upon the 4G infrastructure they already have and releasing 5G in waves.
I’ve heard that the US is the only country using millimeter wave 5G due to the military constraints.
@@bd8594 that's interesting. Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read up
This is the same as ATT’s 5gE aka a lie
@@ShadmanAhmed1 it's not though. It's a lower frequency 5G
@@ShadmanAhmed1 It's tempting to think so, but I disagree. I take my cues from Sascha Segan at PCMag when it comes to this stuff, since he's one of the best resources for wireless network knowledge I know. His take: "In my view, 5G is a technology that can enable experiences, but it doesn't always do so. It's a radio system called 5G NR, which supports very wide channels and has a rich roadmap for future improvement. By that measure, T-Mobile's low-band 5G is definitely 5G and AT&T's 5GE is not." www.pcmag.com/news/372378/testing-t-mobiles-low-band-5g-lets-call-it-4-9g
Companies need to improve overall coverage and stop chasing each other tails.
ruclips.net/video/fzSvjo2O8-M/видео.html
T-mobile uses low frequency 5g for greater distance. Mm wave has HORRIBLE distance but amazing speed if your next to a tower.
This needs to go for most corporations in a lot of areas. Figure out what need is being fulfilled and focus on that.
We're out here with copy cat phones, cars, food, ect. Substance always wins
Let's be honest, The MrMobile Channel seems to hold the best 5G Coverage on RUclips to date.
Keep it up Michael, really appreciate this honest, unbiased and independent content.
The first understandable explanation of 5G and its upsides/pitfalls that I've seen. Thanks, Michael (err, Mr. Mobile) !!
Every Tech Reviewer: Flexing their Pro display stand
MrMobile: Want to know about the 'other' 5G.
Insufficient mobility
@@TheMrMobile It's just 18 kg, that's still mobile! It has wheels if you want!
ruclips.net/video/fzSvjo2O8-M/видео.html
4G is plenty fast, its faster than most peoples home internet connection. Who needs more than 50-100mbps on a cell phone? Would rather have cell companies deploy more 4G for better coverage than waste time on this crap that no one will notice.
Yeah definetly, this shit isn't innovation, it's fascism.
Uh bc if your connection is faster, then you need the connection for less time. Its about freeing up bandwidth and reducing congestion
There's a million reasons to need higher speed.. are you being sarcastic?
@@ILoveGrilledCheese no im not, no one needs 5g to browse facebook and upload to instagram. 5g is good for getting broadband to people who can't get it another way, but for strictly mobile use, its a waste unless they can get it to have better range and no line of sight issues.
mmWave 5G service is a joke. You won't get any reception inside your home on that bandwidth.
So you will never get those download / upload speeds and 1-6 ms ping latency.
@@tmr8193 1000gb? I think you mean 1000 mbps. Also, it's not fiber optic. It's cable over coaxial. The one that is fiber optic that is offered by Xfinity is the 2000 mbps plan. (Gigabit Pro)
all this 5G blabbering reminds me of my "4G" iphone 4S
The iPhone 4 was never marketed as a 4G device. You must be confused.
Maybe the 4s with hsdpa plus
@@AbeDillon whoops, was thinking in my 4S yet missed the S... I still miss that little device until now
@@amnottabs that makes more sense. I had an original iPhone and an iPhone 4 before switching to Android to save money. They were pretty great phones. I think people blow things like "antenna-gate" way out of proportion.
@uwu manko I mean technically it is 5G technology, so they aren't lying on that front. But the advertising I agree with you; they are really exaggerating a bit with their promises of much faster speeds.
I have Verizon for the last 10 years I work in a kitchen my brother is a executive chef. We both have Verizon we do not get any signal at all whatsoever while inside of the kitchen we have to step outside sometimes even outside of the building. we noticed that people that had T-Mobile had signal inside of the kitchen in the break room like wtf! We have switched over to T-Mobile after almost eleven years of being with Verizon. I get signal in places that I normally didn't get with Verizon. This has been my experience
Me too. Here in Vegas, TMobile is way better than Verizon. And I get Verizon Free from my work.
3:50 - "More often than not, when I looked up at the status bar, it was a 5G indicator glowing back at me"
Unfortunately the display of a 5G icon doesn't always mean your phone is actually on 5G.
While everyone is freaking out over 5G, I'm just happy to get 3Mbps speed over LTE on my phone
@uwu manko the low band is suppose to reach rural areas they can't currently reach... Maintaining 4g LTE speed will be awesome for those people
@uwu manko perhaps you're right, but this is still going to be a big deal no matter what they call it.
@uwu manko check your info, the merger is still on trial
@uwu manko t mobile has already gotten 2 states to stop their lawsuits
@uwu manko doubt it, there's no reason it shouldnt he approved. You need to open your eyes and take a closer look on who is the real bad guy here. All the states left suing are liberals and liberals want to prevent anything good from happening to America unless it benefits their wallet and back pocket
That's the truth manko
2016: 5G is here!
Us: it's not ready yet
2017: 5G is here!
Us: it's not ready yet
2018: 5G is here!
Us again: it's not ready yet
2019: 5G is here!
Us: still not ready
2020: 6G is here!
Us: wait wat
6g research has started will take atleast a decade to launch. And proper 5g might be 5 years.
@@roninr8199 Oh what? Lol i didnt even realize they already started working on it. Thanks for the info!
@@EarAche123 I love to live in future 😃
I have read about quick charge tech way in 2011. I have also read a Stanford journal in 2012 where battery charge was stored in Aluminium plates which can hold charge much longer and charge in seconds.not sure what happened to that.
Appreciate your disclaimers about sponsors and brands used in your videos
Nah I’m good I would rather have 4g than cancer
4G is here to stay comfortably till at least next 3 years.
A big point Qualcomm kept making at the Snapdragon Summit was that 4G will continue to be an integral part of 5G for the next many years. So yeah!
since OFDMA is just being improved and still used in 5g, not a suprise
Currently, most 5G rollouts are using NSA, meaning nonstandalone so 4G is still used for singaling even when phone is connected to 5G for data. Anyway, there aren't nearly any 5G phone you can buy beside few flaghips, like 1 or 2 high mid priced phones from Chinese companies?
@@wiziek hopefully with the new chips from Qualcomm next year's phones should be 5g ready
@@Roshanrshenoy1 This more about price, bringing CPU and modems with affordable devices.
It's not really hard to understand, I would rather have more coverage with good speed and connection than high speed and no connection, Verizon is clueless imo.
Verizon’s 4g network is already faster and has better coverage than T-Mobile’s 5g network so it actually makes sense for them to focus on getting the highest speeds.
Yes and plus, C-band will give Verizon best of both worlds (coverage and speed)
I bought the Samgsung S10 5G from T-Mobile and guess what....they are not supporting it as of December 6th as promised.
You can get a new phone free. Check your emails. I got redeemed mine yesterday. It's limited to 5 phones, but 3 of them are nice ones.
Thats bc Tmobile as a corporation sucks hahaha
The greatness of 5G will be combining all low and high frequencies depending on the case.
Only 600Mhz won't give you much, but combine 600Mhz with other sub 6Ghz bands and you have great speeds and coverage everywhere. And mmWave will be awesome for crowded places like train stations and busy streets.
No it won't. All those people will block the signal. You need line of sight.
Not sure what the T-Mobile and Sprint merger would do. When I start driving north after a bit my signal drops 4G and goes to unusable 3G. This is on GoogleFi which is both TMobile and Sprint. I'm thinking of going to Spectrum Mobile, which is Verizon. Would rather have working 4G and super fast 5G than "meh" 5G and no 4G.
Here's the million dollar question. Will the 600mhz 5G put signal out there where there's no 4G?
unless you live in a huge City probably won't get to take advantage of that 5g
We will only see faster speeds when more spectrum becomes available . The FCC needs to act quickly on mid band
Great video. I'm a retired Coast Guard Communications Officer and have been following the transition from 4G to 5G. Uunfortunately, T-Mo has zero 5G covereage anywhere near the mid-Atlanic except DC. I forwarded this video to several friends & family because even non-tech types will understand the way you explained the current state of 5G.
I like the Professionalism which Mr.Mobile keeps in his reviews ! It makes his videos more engaging !
When T-Mobile first started upgrading their towers it was suppose to be faster 4g then out of no where changed the name to 5g . Sounds like a marketing tactic
Honesty. I love it. More tech reviewers need to take a page from this review. Well done, Michael.
I really hope you know the price YOU & EVERY HUMAN WILL PAY fot YOUR faster surfing. OMG!!!!!!
How much editing / color correcting was done to the McLaren's video output here? Seems very saturated, almost in a Samsung-from-a-few-years-ago sort of way.
None. That's, erm, sadly ... just what OnePlus does to colors. (Actually that's not quite fair: it's a byproduct of what color space OnePlus is using ... so you can indeed correct for it if you have the editing expertise to do so, as Danny Winget has told me). But out of the camera ... that's what it looks like. It wasn't fun to cut that in with the Fuji and iPhone footage, I tell ya. Blurgh.
Verstand the Oneplus video is outputting colors in Rec 2020 which is considered HDR to a certain extent and the colors are not adjusted to back to Rec 709 on export which are the colors we are used to that’s why it’s so saturated. You can convert the colors in an editor like Final Cut Pro and the colors look amazing. Check out my OnePlus 7 Pro 4K camera samples video if you want to see what they look like with the color space adjusted.
Thanks Danny. Drop a link!
1:58 The reason they are Chopping down the trees
Which is ABSURD....a damn connection over trees, which supply the best oxygen.
Completely disagree with the Sprint/TMobile merger argument. They had the same argument with the ATT/TMobile merger in 2011, that it would speed up 4G deployment; sure it may have, but in the long run it would hurt prices. I mean look what happened in the end, in the 8 years proceeding that argument, we have 4G almost everywhere now with TMobile being able to reduce prices industry wide to compete.
Now the whole "Oh woe is me, Sprint can't survive without TMobile.", is a whole other bag of dogshit. The CEO of SoftBank sent an email in 2017 that said he was willing to eat all of sprints debt if he needed to, so it's another lie.
It wasn't a lie. He said that he would eat the debt if he needed to. He doesn't need to!
Just make sure the 4G is stable for use...in some areas it’s garbage.
Your writing is hands down the best of all youtbers... love your videos.
Jesus what is oneplus doing with their cameras? the video looks way too saturated. everything looks redish orange
Ikr
monge mrxcvi gcam fixes it, but it’s still good, but not above averga
That's Chinas style.
I thought it looked _okay_
monge mrxcvi iPhone Squad where you at 🔥🔥🔥🍏🍏
That Camera Sample you used from the OnePlus is exactly the reason I’ll never buy one again. It’s like OnePlus thinks it’s alright to dial the saturation up to 300% and call it a day. 2:25
I'd say it's around 465%
Just like when it called HSPE+ ”4G”. Two 3G antennas don't make 4G.
4g just means 4th gen wireless lte,wimax,hspe+ were all released in that 4th gen window.
Is that the average LTE speeds you normally get on any carrier in the US? I get a consistent 100+ Mbps on Rogers in Canada (west coast)
Mark Shan I have an iPhone 6S with a cell tower right behind my house so I have full bars. I usually get about 50 Mbps. I’d probably get slightly better speeds with a newer phone.
@@SalivatingSteve Weird. Maybe it's because there are less people in Canada. I remember my sister getting around 100 with an iphone 4 when it first released
hmm so 5g millimeter signal is gone when indoors, its not mobile anymore if have to stand outside facing straight to towers to get its signal
That's how cells phones worked when when I was kid with the Nokia bricks. It seems like we are going backwards lol
@@imcrazyforwar We are. It's like back in the mid 90s when laptops had IR blasters to share data but needed a perfectly lined up setup and still probably, wouldn't work
@@WalnutSpice holyshit I forgot about those
What is name of song at 3:56
With T-Mobile 5G we can get the speeds promised with 4G LTE a decade ago.
Nice 😂 😂 😂
0 service in East Texas where I'm at, there map says it has service
"Let's push a 5g network that's not ready yet, but claim it's here." - US mobile companies
The way they done it is by combining is combining T-Mobile and Sprint.
I'm going to Maui in April. Wont even care what network speed im getting, cause Hawaii is a place to escape that tech lifestyle.
Haha that's exactly was I was thinking.
TMobile launched on dec 6th... it's the 12th. Just like 4g LTE took time to deploy and get enhancements, 5g will be the same. I see tons of comments saying it's fake and not worth it etc... it will get better, especially with the merger once its approved officially. Patience is a good thing in most cases
Yess! I have time to save for my note 12 when 5G is fully implemented and polished. I don't have to upgrade my Note 10 plus
In my case, since I live in a developing country. I can still keep my Galaxy S10E for a long time until 5G is fully implemented in 2027 or later
@@LightningSnake jaja xD
*Why no 60fps or 2160p Mr. Fisher?*
MrMobile x MrWhoseTheBoss. the best voice-overs on the site
Also Mkbhd
@@blondedip777 unscripted?
Should I buy current latest iPhone 11 pro since it still doesn’t support 5g network?
Zaim Afham Why would you get it for not having it?
Brandon Y I’m still using iPhone X and still works perfectly but I’m not again that replace phone every time the new one get released. So if I want to use for a long term maybe I should phone with more new feature rather than additional one camera.
Im in country Australia, I get excited when I get a 4G signal.... or ANY signal out here 😄
Is it really that hard to get data connection in Australia??
@@ShibaScience Australia is really quite big and most of it is barely inhabited. It's only really worth the networks' time and money investing in the urban areas there (plus a healthy dose of taking their customers for a ride).
@@tams805 I mean, sure. But the US is pretty big too and they were able to cover the entire county in a short amount of time. Though you make a valid point that the environment for both is completely different, so I understand why it may be difficult to do that.
Theres lots of coverage in area where theres a good population (even 5g in main cities) but rural/country areas are not great at all. They’re working on it, but with a population less than 30million, in a country the size of the USA, service covering every part of Australia wouldn’t be financially sustainable.
Wont be long and Elon Musk’s internet project will see everyone using voIP calls when its up n running.
Thanks for explaining the different levels of signal between Verizon and T-Mobile. That actually explains why sometimes I have signal in the offices I work in (I'm with T-Mobile) and why sometimes my friend's phone with Verizon doesn't have signal. But also thank you for explaining all tech is such a great simple way that even someone who isn't that much of a tech person, they can understand it. Keep up the great work! I always enjoy your tech videos.
'5G:The Final Countdown Reloaded'..... (Sooo much Mind blowing Info!!!)
The videos from OnePlus 7T look terrible for me, the colour was so bad
Amen.
How are you only getting only around 50Mbps on 5g and I'm close to 100mbps on lte and my 5g phone is getting an average of 600mbps on T-Mobile?
Wow, commenting first! Love the videos you make MrMobile, they're great and well done. Grateful that I subscribed.
Thanks for the kind words, and for watching!
BUT, there is NO T-Mobile 5G coverage in San Francisco. Why is that?? And even if there is, the areas of coverage is limited...hmmm
4G is fast enough, I have no need for any 5g.
Wait till they slow it down like 3g
It will eventually be real slow as the amount of data being transferred goes beyond the ability for 4G. It’s the same thing that happened with 3G when 4G being widely adopted.
So if I get the Samsung note with 5g it won't work as a hotspot for 5g yet?
Thank you so much for being one of the few reviewers who gives the big picture and real world experience. Longwave 5G may not be much faster, but I'm led to believe it'll be much less prone to slowdowns due to the number of users on the system.
Watch this if you want the real 'big picture' about 5G ruclips.net/video/7KI_pWRNd1A/видео.html
I wonder if people who buy 5G capable devices now to use with this low band 5G will be able to use the same devices with Ultra Wide Band once they roll that out. Or is Ultra Wide Band aka millimeter wave a Verizon thing only?
More like 4.5G
Turkey supposedly has 4.5G but that's just a little boosted 4G 😂
TMobile's 4G rollout was similar. I was among the first of my friends in my small Missouri town to have 4G, but most of my friends' 3G was only slightly slower. Over time the 4G got good though. I'm hopeful 5G goes the same way.
This is really blowing my shit like yes TMobile has more coverage but as stated in the video 5g phones generally cost hundreds more than their 4g counter parts but they haven't solved anything this changes nothing
They merge get Sprint's towers now they advantage of coverage not speed yes it's a new standard and eventually speed will increase but I could say the same about Verizon's service
Eventually 5g coverage will improve- Verizon
This pushes the problem for later not solves it basically TMobile announced that they going overall boost their 4g and then eventually increase it as time goes on
War Head - True; which is why I'm not rushing into 5G. It's where 4G was when it was first deployed. (Both AT&T and Verizon are cannibalizing 3G to deploy 5G - which T-Mobile had already done. There is an article on Android Authority that explains this.)
Perhaps this is not about speed, perhaps this is about the internet of things, surveillance capitalism in the first stages then evolving with the rise of China as a major global power into a dystopic world ruled by a technocratic -communist elite.
@@jasatx2024 well that was always the stated goal 5g is expected to bring the iot but the complaint is more about the bliant push of the tech that solves nothing or is so beta is barely exist to do anything with especially when u factor in price of plans and/or devices going up for no real reason not even considering how bad current plans/coverage is in the states
"Our search for millimeter wave reception has brought us... to the kiddie pool"
I'm fucking dying
Why don't they just upgrade 4g. From the evidence 5g is going to be a failure in comparison.
ruclips.net/video/fzSvjo2O8-M/видео.html
And if you live in a town under 500,000 you can expect your 5G when 3 years later when 6 G is being installed
For me I switched to T-Mobile for the future of what it can be capable of . So hopefully it was the smart move. At this point... this reminds me of what LTE was like when first deployed. Great video tho! And thank you!
Brian Clemons - I switched to T-Mobile's network (I'm a Tracfone customer - which supports both carrier networks, and provides US $1.00 network switching that you can do yourself) because I was changing phones (from the Galaxy Nexus to the S7); said S7 was an ex-Verizon phone that was network-locked (which meant that taking it to Verizon was a non-starter). The S7's SoC was a generic SoC from Qualcomm (one of the first such) and only needed new firmware (ODIN to the rescue). Once I got the replacement SIM from doing the network-swap, that and a firmware download via ODIN and I was off to the races. I'm not new to T-Mobile's network, as Tracfone is not the only MVNO that uses, or has used, their network - remember Virgin Mobile (now part of Metro - T-Mobile's in-house prepaid arm)? I pounded Virgin Mobile rather viciously - mostly due to their phone choice; all the S7 swap did was make said pounding make even MORE sense - I went from swearing AT T-Mobile's network to swearing BY it (I recommend T-Mobile's network today - and especially if you are on an MVNO that can leverage it), and it has exactly squat to do with 5G. (Other MVNOs that do - or can - leverage T-Mobile's network include Wal-Mart Mobile and Consumer Cellular.)
the problem with the tmobile 5g it's not in stand alone mode yet and shares bandwidth 4g users on the same 600 mzt band
My Verizon 4g gives me those speeds
I guess it all depends on location. My brother has Verizon and I have T-Mobile , my phone is faster than his phone about 70% of the time where live. One of my friends got the McLaren last month and it's almost twice as fast as my phone on average. I guess It just means T-Mobile has focused more on my area
Depends on area. I have sprint and at certain areas in town my LTE speeds have topped 100mbps. Blew my mind. Maxed out at 116 lol
Wish I could get some of that at home. At home I'm lucky to get 1 mbps with sprint. Moving soon so shouldn't be too much of an issue longer
@onii-chan's manko no I hate sprint, I miss verizon wish I never left. Owe then money. Soon as I can afford to ok going back to them.
what 5g phone do you use that has mmW phase array antenna? I bet you are not even using mmW. most likely n77/78/79. mmW won’t transmit that far away.
5G and your health! We need to talk about that.
I'm getting between 160 to 180 Mbps on 5g with my Galaxy S10 5g here in Australia
Buying a 5g phone is like buying a new electric or new model car....... never do it. Wait until the kinks get worked out and get a better price.
Where did that presentation from verizon happen?
It's Maui time!
Just did a 4G speed test. 130 Mbps down, 26.2 Mbps up. I'm on T-Mobile (Pixel 4XL) so I wonder if I'd notice much of a difference. Probably not worth rushing out to get a new phone for yet. However, it would be nice if they started offering affordable home internet options with the 5G rollout. I'd get rid of comcast in a second if it was good.
"Probably not worth rushing out to get a new phone for yet" Spoiler alert for the end of the video, kids. 😂
Everyone : Speed Speed speed
Me: what are the health risk???
Everyone: 🤤
There isnt any
Verizon's LTE Advanced can get almost 200mbs down. I have tested it at 184 in Williamsburg, Virginia. The lowest I tested was about 160. So much for T-Mobile's 5G that isn't even as fast as Verizon's LTE Advanced.
Max I could pull on T-Mo's roof node in this video was 270 down, so given a proper network deployment (and low demand) 5G on sub-6 is still a substantial improvement. Of course, those are ideal circumstances.
@@TheMrMobile that's not bad. T-Mobile are doing good by using lower bands that can actually cover places other than downtown streets in large cities and stadiums. I think good reliable 5G is still at least 2 years away.
T-Mobile current 5G is a joke. Don’t waste your money getting a new device for that crap.
Ah, Maui. It was absolutely beautiful in 1985, before more construction was done to entice an increase in tourism! With the mountainous terrain on all of the islands, it's a miracle 5g would work consistently in every location on each island.
T-Mobile is the carrier of the future..
THANK YOU for saving me $900 dollars. I was going to buy my wife the 7T pro as a gift, until I saw your video. Last year I bought a new phone that has an octacore, (dual processors at 2.2 MHz), 128 gig memory, and 6 gigs of ram, dual rear cameras and a front camera for around $200.00. I am happy. I will buy her one like that, and wait 5 yrs.
So why are there no tech youtubers talking about 5G dangers too? There are always two sides
Having 2000 mbps over 100-200 mbps cool, until you don't realize, that it's like having your mum packing 1000 sandwiches in your lunchbox each day, instead of only 50 or a 100 sandwiches. They are just sandwiches. They are good for the moment, but after a while, they are not. And it's not like anybody is buying them. So you don’t end up using them!
Ivo Ovcharov Exactly my home Internet is 100 mbps which is already really fast. My phone gets about 50 mbps which is still good. My phone has a 720p screen so I’m not streaming 4K, I don’t get the need for 1000mbps bandwidth on a phone. They’ll put up a data cap anyway
Radiation exposure at a quicker rate exactly what we need bravo
JEDASE if only ppl would think like this but naw blind sheeps
You both are very ignorant and don't know anything about how electromagnetic spectrum works...
Dominic are you not aware 5G is WEAPONS GRADE TECH. Wake up bud. You think these companies are spending billions so you can download 1/4 second faster?! I feel sorry for you and your children if you do.
Dominick Brewer it’s not rocket science on how frequencies work were just stating the more demand of fast cell data will bring more consequences than good. That’s all
@@rwhite4728 Can you back up that statement please? Microwaves aren't even ionizing so how could it damage DNA. You should be more afraid of the sun because it produces every wavelength on the electromagnetic spectrum (granted anything that is UV gets through the atmosphere) and guess what!? You are surrounded by UV rays which is way worse on so many levels which IS a type of ionizing radiation! If you're so scared of photons why don't you just hide in some sort of lead box with your stupid looking tinfoil hat!? Oh wait! You emit photons too believe it or not and good luck getting all of that lead! Do your research pal.
even as 600mhz, 5g is much better for geforce now, nvidias game streaming application right?
can anyone explain this, I'm near a 5G tower right now, and it feels like my damn body temperature is rising. It's very uncomfortable 😂
Gaming with Rocket the 5G is microwaving you!
Don't upgrade to it
5G is cancer.
Gaming with Rocket really? I think you’re lying that’s not possible
Yep. There are no safe test results at all. No independent testing has been done. It's been launched where I live as a testbed & we're ill with radiation symptoms, as are our pets. There are court cases going on at the minute. I don't know why anyone would want this. People who are interested can checkout Barrie Trower's videos. Ex Royal Navy Weapons Expert. The Sasha Stone 5g movie is also informative.
Most people will not need it. Most people don’t need a car that goes from zero to 60 in less than three seconds. Why pay $60K on a Cadillac or Lexus when you can buy a Toyota or Nissan at half that cost?
Off course they need it in order to show off. Just because some people need a status symbol doesn't make it a sensible choice for most people.
Actually its a Completely new Tower that uses the same mm wave MILITARY Crowd Dispersal Weapon technology...
*research the active denial system*
Sheeple don't wanna hear this
@@redkeating5933 yep its getting weird in the world!
Steve Harvey's White Clone They are in the Matrix skipping and singing to their own demise.
UFS 3 and a type C cable is what you need for those big 5g phone to PC downloads. Transfer's at like 100MB/s on my Op7
5G all kinds of health issues
And your proof?
@@izralsei7617 ruclips.net/video/fzSvjo2O8-M/видео.html
@@mariaevora2142 What he is saying is all conspiracy. I've spoke to two physicist and hopefully soon about to hear from a NASA physicist. Crowd control is nonsense and 5g waves are non ionizing which means that they cannot pierce through the human body or any other life forms. Dont brainwash yourself with the wrong material. Even scientists like him get proven wrong.
Richard Snook,i agree.Way too many health problems asccociated with 5G. No thanks,slow and steady wins the race every time.
Ok boomer
I am a Moto Z3 user (bite me) who lives in a very rural area that Verizon has almost to itself. The 4G LTE is as reliable as one could ask for within immediate city/township limits, but drops to 3G 2-3 miles out then dies beyond that. I'd be shocked to see Verizon 5G showing up within 5 years here, since current 5G tech requires all those repeaters above streets to keep the signal going. Fine in urban areas mostly, utterly impractical in rural areas. Also, so much of this 5G tech currently on the market won't make it to halfway before newer protocols/infrastructure are in place, hence my trepidation to buy that 5G Moto Mod. It's like getting a slot car for Xmas without the track. Not too much fun.
5g hasn’t been tested for human safety. Search “5g Wheeler” for more information as to why.
This is why I didnt get a 5G phone. I'm good with 4G.
Search "eugenics"
Search "logical opinions" and you won't find any of what you just said
Andrew Montigue 5g has not been tested for human safety. Your snide comments won’t change the facts.
@@LifeSizeBox Have you never looked it up? There are many TRUSTED sources that have proven you wrong. I appreciate your concern nonetheless.
If u wanna use ur 5g network as a hotspot use pdanet+ which uses it
*PLEASE DO A REVIEW OF 5G FROM SPRINT!!! Cities such as LA, Phoenix, Texas*
#TheORGINAL5G #TRUE5G #ONE5G
The low band is cool for coverage even in villages far away, but they could have stick with LTE... Better release some 5G cells at 3,5 GHz, for better speeds and average coverage.
well at least in korea i get 1gb/s download speed over 5g on my bed
I get 100+ mbps on Tmobile 4G LTE, but their hotspot speed is only 0.5 mbps which really sucks unless you pay an extra $15 to get 4G speeds but that's only on the first 20GB of data.
First world: my mobile data is slow *30+mbs*
Third world: woow so fast *2-7mbs*
Do you have an update video on this now ?
Here’s the update you need:
Beside the faster speed, the actually benefit of 5G is to alleviate the effect of congestion. For example, if you’re at the airport, 4G will get really slow because it’s congested. But if you’re on 5G, you can get atleast usuable speed.
Node or antenna?
I saw an antenna.
I agree. Spring 2020 smartphones with 865/765 Qualcomm Snapdragon at the earliest.