Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

"King above the law”: Is the United States president above the law? | BBC Americast

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 авг 2024
  • In one of its most pivotal decisions of the year, the US Supreme Court has ruled that US presidents can have absolute immunity for ‘official’ acts.
    The 6-3 historic decision effectively strips out key parts of an indictment against former president Donald Trump for allegedly conspiring to overturn his 2020 election defeat.
    Three justices have issued a blistering dissent to the US Supreme Court opinion granting Trump partial immunity from prosecution, warning that it will allow presidential power to be used "for evil ends".
    Six conservative-leaning justices signed the majority opinion, but the three liberals dissented, expressing "fear for our democracy".
    But how far could the leader of the free world push the definition of a presidential duty?
    On this week’s Americast, the BBC’s Sarah Smith and Anthony Zurcher discuss this question with constitutional law expert Alison LaCroix and Steve Bannon, former strategist for Donald Trump.
    Subscribe here: bit.ly/1rbfUog
    For more news, analysis and features visit: www.bbc.com/news
    #BBCNews #US #Americast

Комментарии • 551

  • @adstix
    @adstix Месяц назад +55

    The same judges who say "yes" now will be the first to say "no" depending on which President exactly was in question!
    For example, one wonders if Obama could've gotten away with a fraction of all what Trump has said and done.
    One just wonders!

    • @russelljones9207
      @russelljones9207 Месяц назад

      Obama got away with the assassination of American citizens.

    • @RMSTitanicWSL
      @RMSTitanicWSL Месяц назад

      I don't wonder.........

    • @simulationkoyo
      @simulationkoyo Месяц назад +3

      They probably forgot that Biden can now do whatever he wants to Trump, or even to them judges for that matter.

    • @birdstwin1186
      @birdstwin1186 Месяц назад +1

      No they would not.

    • @paulnicholson1906
      @paulnicholson1906 Месяц назад +3

      They wanted to prosecute him for wearing a tan suit.

  • @catdavis9328
    @catdavis9328 Месяц назад +80

    I don't want s dictatorship or a monarchy.

    • @polygonalmasonary
      @polygonalmasonary Месяц назад +14

      Tough, the Supreme Court just made America exactly that, an unaccountable autocracy. 👍🇬🇧🙏🌈♥️

    • @orawancarlile6192
      @orawancarlile6192 Месяц назад

      ​@@polygonalmasonaryIt was planned by Republicans long ago.

    • @klrklr116
      @klrklr116 Месяц назад

      None of us want a dictator or a king, except the brainwashed, brain dead sycophants who think a washed up TV celebrity that has an ego problem and is a narcissist. Not the sharpest tools in the shed are voting for trump.

    • @klrklr116
      @klrklr116 Месяц назад

      None of us want a dictator or king for America, except the delusional brainwashed cult who think he’s great...because he told them he is great. Not the sharpest tools in the shed.🤪

    • @gailseatonhumbert
      @gailseatonhumbert Месяц назад +1

      ​@@polygonalmasonaryhardly the response we will make.

  • @HD-ux4jt
    @HD-ux4jt Месяц назад +63

    My question is, after the Supreme Court ruled on USA president immunity . Can the American president fire all Supreme Court Justices and replace them with new ones ?

    • @michelletubbs4779
      @michelletubbs4779 Месяц назад +5

      NO

    • @benzeeable1
      @benzeeable1 Месяц назад +5

      Well, It’s possible based on where the country is headed now. We need help. Based on that first debate, it looks like what someone asked, “is that the last episode of America’s democracy????”
      When is it okay for someone with lots of crime against the country and siding with communism, to run for president. I am Tired of these old farts.

    • @hvt45
      @hvt45 Месяц назад +2

      the president can, just no one done it yet. It's call flexible thinking.

    • @giangstr
      @giangstr Месяц назад +12

      Yes. He can

    • @russelljones9207
      @russelljones9207 Месяц назад

      Yes it's exactly the same as it was before. This ruling would not prevent the President from doing this, not sure why you'd think it would.

  • @jasonbarnett7747
    @jasonbarnett7747 Месяц назад +74

    *CRITICAL THINKING:* How can the president be held accountable for crimes, if evidence of their crimes cannot be reviewed by any court in America?

    • @benweb1105
      @benweb1105 Месяц назад

      When the High Court Judges (but all judges in general) are corrupted ... than anybody could be above the law ... that has enough money to pay them!

    • @chimmy987
      @chimmy987 Месяц назад +5

      “Guilty until proven innocent”

    • @BrianDarcy-1331
      @BrianDarcy-1331 Месяц назад +3

      coup de ta

    • @benweb1105
      @benweb1105 Месяц назад

      When the Hight Court step over the Constitution to protect Insurrectionist Trump to run for re-election... They have trashed American Constitution and no "democrat", "republican", or "independent" did anything in America! Although they have taken the Oath to Support, Protect, and Defend the Constitution!

    • @jasonbarnett7747
      @jasonbarnett7747 Месяц назад

      ​@@chimmy987that's not what I asked, idiot. Learn how to read.

  • @Chris-Longhair
    @Chris-Longhair Месяц назад +7

    If it is impossible for consequences to be brought upon a perpetrator of a crime, that crime is decriminalised, de facto legal.

  • @isnamthere4690
    @isnamthere4690 Месяц назад +3

    Sounds like your analyst is saying that anything trump has done is covered by immunity, but anything Biden could think up to do to thwart trump would be off limits and not covered by immunity.

  • @phil20_20
    @phil20_20 Месяц назад +19

    It's a Coup.

  • @tiffanypeppers9417
    @tiffanypeppers9417 Месяц назад +6

    Sending love to Britian 😊

  • @jeannahayescook9375
    @jeannahayescook9375 Месяц назад +1

    I wouldn't let the BBC recommend toilet paper.

  • @kimberlyholt2241
    @kimberlyholt2241 Месяц назад +7

    Money

  • @shinyshinythings
    @shinyshinythings Месяц назад +9

    So tragic, the fate of the United States, and all because in 2016 some number of people didn’t like the sound of a woman’s voice.

  • @GodzHarleyGirlStudio
    @GodzHarleyGirlStudio Месяц назад +18

    Hate that the supreme court’s decision was absolutely ridiculous.

    • @RammingSpeed-lk8kk
      @RammingSpeed-lk8kk Месяц назад

      Why are you PRO SWAMP and pro WOKE establishment?

    • @birdstwin1186
      @birdstwin1186 Месяц назад

      They ruled correctly within the law. You are no lawyer, that is why you are merely a youtube commenter. Best to know one's true limits.

    • @fargoth391
      @fargoth391 Месяц назад +2

      @@birdstwin1186 I'm sure history has shown that it's always a good idea to never criticize your government, and to never question their actions. You just go with the flow.
      Surely nothing bad has ever happened with this mindset.

    • @adamk.7177
      @adamk.7177 Месяц назад

      @@birdstwin1186 You are also not anyone of importance, but merely -- you guessed it -- a youtube commenter. Best to shut the hell up before someone else calls you out for the very thing you mock another for. If your brain were bigger than your ego, you'd probably have seen this coming.

    • @theresestcoeur5381
      @theresestcoeur5381 Месяц назад

      ​@@fargoth391 Can you tell me what will happened to Medias ? They want answer to their questions.

  • @ericfaith2810
    @ericfaith2810 Месяц назад +5

    Please drop the cowboy music. Some of us in America are self-educated and know the score on many complicated issues. Try some classical please.

    • @MEATBALLmonty
      @MEATBALLmonty Месяц назад +2

      It's folk music.

    • @binkwillans5138
      @binkwillans5138 Месяц назад

      Classical music is not appropriate to matters relating to conspiracy, sedition and insurrection. I suggest the original cowboy music be retained.

  • @znxster
    @znxster Месяц назад +13

    America is meant to have three branches of power. The reasoning behind these branches was to keep each other in line.
    Legislative (Congress / Senate)
    Executive (President)
    Judicial (Supreme Court)
    In my opinion, the Supreme Court just stripped some of its own authority. Which has unbalanced the authority towards to the Executive branch, weakening the other two.

    • @russelljones9207
      @russelljones9207 Месяц назад

      They aren't supposed to 'keep each other in line'. They are supposed to not interfere with each other, hence the separation.

    • @znxster
      @znxster Месяц назад

      @@russelljones9207 For instance, the President can veto a law passed by Congress. Does that mean the President "interferes" with Congress?
      Equally Congress can override the veto President with a 2/3 majority, "interfering" with the President's veto power.
      Or if the President nominates a Justice but then the Senate doesn't approve it. Does that not mean the Senate interferes with the President?
      There are a bunch of other examples.
      The intent of the three branches is to separate power, ensuring that no single branch possess overwhelming power and creating a system which checks itself.
      I feel the balance has been removed.

    • @idrisali3947
      @idrisali3947 Месяц назад +7

      @@russelljones9207look up checks and balances please

    • @russelljones9207
      @russelljones9207 Месяц назад +1

      @@idrisali3947 You really need to explain how you saying a sentence undos centuries of thinking on constitutional law. Please explain how and why the founding fathers wanted different powers to dominance challenge each other and why it's been kept a secret until now. Thanks

    • @idrisali3947
      @idrisali3947 Месяц назад

      @@russelljones9207 i just did, i told you to look up checks and balances lol. it’s no “secret”, they teach this in elementary school. ya know what? look up schoolhouse rock capital hill 😂 maybe that will be easier to digest

  • @user-jgn1944
    @user-jgn1944 Месяц назад +6

    Question. Why is A President. Or an Ex president so different from amy other person in the USA? Aren't they Human beings also?

    • @RMSTitanicWSL
      @RMSTitanicWSL Месяц назад +1

      Read "Animal Farm" by George Orwell sometime........

    • @TheCrusmon6
      @TheCrusmon6 Месяц назад

      ...because in the United States shyster lawyers will sue them and prosecute them for everything they did. We can't have that! In the United States the President is the first of three branches of government. Can you prosecute Parliament???

    • @AncientttimeZ
      @AncientttimeZ Месяц назад +1

      They have to make tough decisions and cannot have doubt to make the tough decisions. If that is beyond your capability to understand, then we are happy you are not in power...

    • @RMSTitanicWSL
      @RMSTitanicWSL Месяц назад +1

      @@AncientttimeZ Yes, they do, SeniletimeZ. But because we are a nation of laws, they still have to be accountable for those actions.

    • @AncientttimeZ
      @AncientttimeZ Месяц назад +1

      @@RMSTitanicWSL To bad democrats do not adhere to that concept! Why are the crooked democrats not held account for all the evil things they do?

  • @jeanclaudejunior
    @jeanclaudejunior Месяц назад +4

    No one is above the law!

    • @simonpkiss1035
      @simonpkiss1035 Месяц назад +2

      Diaper Don is now, thanks to the Supreme Court.

    • @jeanclaudejunior
      @jeanclaudejunior Месяц назад

      @@simonpkiss1035 the Supreme Court needs to be abolished and replaced

    • @AncientttimeZ
      @AncientttimeZ Месяц назад

      According to Joe Biden, illegals are above the law!

    • @AncientttimeZ
      @AncientttimeZ Месяц назад +1

      According to Joe Biden, illegals are above the law!

    • @elainechang824
      @elainechang824 Месяц назад

      Yes right but Biden and his family above the law.
      They sold country to China and Russia Ukraine Biden family got bribe .but media be quiet only Trump is issue

  • @russelljones9207
    @russelljones9207 Месяц назад +8

    Just to clear this up, the Monarchy IS NOT above the law. Rule of law means nobody is. The King could be prosecuted, you do not need the crown to prosecute, private prosecutions happen all the time, ask the RSPCA.

    • @theresestcoeur5381
      @theresestcoeur5381 Месяц назад

      @ russeljones9207 ; I think she ( the woman witn blond hair) said the king Charles is above the law and cannot be procetuted.

    • @Rhubarb-ob5fj
      @Rhubarb-ob5fj Месяц назад

      in theory maybe, not in practice

    • @ActivelyVacant
      @ActivelyVacant Месяц назад

      Look up the trial of King Charles I. He argued that the courts had no authority to put him on trial. That argument didn't stop him from losing his head in the end.

  • @rhondasmiley9148
    @rhondasmiley9148 Месяц назад +23

    Unfortunately trump knows that Biden is not hard harden like him. He has a conscious and wants to do whats right not cruel. But many wishes he would. Trump will use this ruling if rlected and end democracy.

  • @_Reviewer
    @_Reviewer Месяц назад +2

    Because the United States president is no less than a king. He is " King of the world ".

    • @binkwillans5138
      @binkwillans5138 Месяц назад +1

      Like the King of the Forest, as described in Frazier's Golden Bough. One day you lose. And with you go your minions, your empire and your people. King for a day.

  • @martinze11
    @martinze11 Месяц назад

    To leave "official act" undefined is sloppy. A nation with sloppy law is a sloppy nation.

  • @HCWoodDesign
    @HCWoodDesign Месяц назад +11

    Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq????

    • @_Reviewer
      @_Reviewer Месяц назад +2

      Bush and Blair both disappeared long ago from the news 😄😄😂😂. Nobody could ask them about millions of deaths and destruction.

    • @binkwillans5138
      @binkwillans5138 Месяц назад

      @@_Reviewer If you recall, there were protests all over Europe and America after war announcement. Bush announced it with the most sheepish defeated look I ever saw. The public broadcast with Blair in House of Commons was cut short by BBC and replaced with talking heads. The International Atomic Commission said Iraq did not have nuclear capability. The initial war thrust was based on an alleged sighting of an Iraqi intelligence officer with people suspected of the anthrax mailings.
      .
      Everybody knew then, and everybody knows now. Iraq was just revenge for the Bush Snr failing in 1992.

  • @johnmoore5293
    @johnmoore5293 Месяц назад

    How about judges and politicians immunity?

  • @ericfaith2810
    @ericfaith2810 Месяц назад +1

    No one has perfectly earned everything they have in life, especially former president Richard Nixon. People help each other charitably and kindly all of the time.

  • @ANGEL_BOB_YT
    @ANGEL_BOB_YT Месяц назад +3

    The king is a constitutional monarch he cannot be tried in his own court but that is not true he can be just need an act of parliament

    • @skycloud4802
      @skycloud4802 Месяц назад +4

      People forget that Charles of Stuart times was tried by parliament and beheaded. Kings have been answerable to the people since the Magna Carta.

    • @graveperil2169
      @graveperil2169 Месяц назад

      @@skycloud4802 well at least the Barons

    • @russelljones9207
      @russelljones9207 Месяц назад +2

      Private prosecutions happen all the time. Also, the house of lords can convene as a court as and when necessary.

  • @standstand6569
    @standstand6569 Месяц назад +9

    4.1 million votes for Reform UK is pretty spectacular !

    • @caynebyron
      @caynebyron Месяц назад +4

      Oh wow, 4 seats. Pathetic.

    • @lankystreakofpiss4765
      @lankystreakofpiss4765 Месяц назад

      ​@@caynebyron 5 seats actually and 600,000+ more votes than lib Dems which proves something needs to change as lib Dems got 71 seats which is disgusting and for reform who only really got going a month ago is incredible.

    • @Nxck2440
      @Nxck2440 Месяц назад +2

      Even with your faces as red as a plum, you could only muster up 4 seats 😂😂😂

    • @standstand6569
      @standstand6569 Месяц назад +1

      @@caynebyron
      4.1 million votes for Reform UK is pretty spectacular !

    • @standstand6569
      @standstand6569 Месяц назад +1

      @@Nxck2440
      4.1 million votes for Reform UK is pretty spectacular !

  • @ericwilson8558
    @ericwilson8558 Месяц назад +7

    If it's one thing I learned in life, it's that nobody is above the law.

    • @polygonalmasonary
      @polygonalmasonary Месяц назад +2

      Wait till your 16 🤣🤣🤣🇬🇧🙏♥️

    • @mrc0157
      @mrc0157 Месяц назад +1

      So far Ron El D'ump has been above the law.....

    • @hollytalbot6695
      @hollytalbot6695 Месяц назад +1

      Unless you are a Biden..

    • @MrFancyFingers
      @MrFancyFingers Месяц назад

      @@hollytalbot6695
      What has Biden done that’s illegal?

  • @rubytuesday4564
    @rubytuesday4564 Месяц назад

    Anthony Zucher is a correspondent. He is not a constitutional law expert. But here, he flips off statements which are really uninformed statements. Heads up.

  • @adamk.7177
    @adamk.7177 Месяц назад

    We have a lot of crazies here. I don't think a king would last long.

  • @silafaupaulmeredith7251
    @silafaupaulmeredith7251 Месяц назад +2

    If you can pardon anyone what does that say?

    • @simulationkoyo
      @simulationkoyo Месяц назад

      Cannot pardon anyone under Federal charge.

    • @silafaupaulmeredith7251
      @silafaupaulmeredith7251 Месяц назад

      m @simulationkoyo Pardon under lobby groups such as NRA or AIPAC beautiful corruption to its core and yet it wants all the other f countries to copy their f system

  • @user-jgn1944
    @user-jgn1944 Месяц назад +3

    Does that mean that he Could Kill someone and not be prosecuted?
    If so.
    It STINKS.

    • @simulationkoyo
      @simulationkoyo Месяц назад +2

      means Biden can. to Trump and these Judges.

    • @user-bn9fc5hp8v
      @user-bn9fc5hp8v Месяц назад

      Don’t believe they said that!

    • @user-bn9fc5hp8v
      @user-bn9fc5hp8v Месяц назад

      To say Trump can do anything he wants and not be held accountable. Show please where it says that! Irresponsible

    • @cadmdhpro8779
      @cadmdhpro8779 Месяц назад +1

      No. Biased and tortuous explaination. To hysterize peeps....

    • @mogret7451
      @mogret7451 Месяц назад

      Yes but a general said this a couple of years ago "If he were to order that [the killing of family members of terrorists] once in government, the American armed forces would refuse to act. You are not required to follow an unlawful order. That would be in violation of all the international laws of armed conflict.”
      So our only hope is that the armed forces do not become Trump fantatics.

  • @bertnijhof5413
    @bertnijhof5413 Месяц назад +19

    Democracy finished in the USA on 1-7-2024 at 10:30 AM!

    • @alexbowman7582
      @alexbowman7582 Месяц назад

      It finished on November 6th 2020 when the Democrats stole the election.

    • @birdstwin1186
      @birdstwin1186 Месяц назад +2

      Good to know. But in reality everyone else consider it democracy.

    • @theresestcoeur5381
      @theresestcoeur5381 Месяц назад

      ​@@birdstwin1186 ❤❤ ALWAYS REMEMBER! NOT IF BIDEN ( OR WHOEVER DEMOCRAT) IS REELECTED, YOU VOTE CONGRESS AND HOUSE BLUE.AND REELECTED A DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT IN 2028 with senate and House Blue and SAME THING AND 2032 TO DELUTE THIS scrotus .AFTER PROBABLY A NEW PARTY WILL EMERGED.❤ YOU HAVE TO DO IT FOR THE WORLD.❤

    • @jamesgarrett5218
      @jamesgarrett5218 Месяц назад

      @@bertnijhof5413 USA is now and will always be a Constitutional Representative Republic, not a democracy. Greece had a democracy and voted themselves into bankruptcy.
      Democracy is majority rule (mob) and minorities are not represented.

  • @maryfrump7937
    @maryfrump7937 Месяц назад +11

    Being an insurrectionist is not official

    • @jasonbarnett7747
      @jasonbarnett7747 Месяц назад

      It doesn't matter, though. Any evidence from an "official act" can no longer be used against the president. They just destroyed the Constitution.

    • @RoseSharon7777
      @RoseSharon7777 Месяц назад

      There was no insurrection. Lol. Unless people were going to use paper knives to take over the country.

    • @chimmy987
      @chimmy987 Месяц назад +3

      @@maryfrump7937 gotta prove the crime first. They can’t. Because he didn’t

    • @jasonbarnett7747
      @jasonbarnett7747 Месяц назад +1

      ​@@chimmy987a jury of 12 people found Trump guilty. Show me proof that the jury was rigged, just like the election. You can't. You're such a loser.

    • @catherinemacaskill1421
      @catherinemacaskill1421 Месяц назад

      Trump's lies about the 2020 election led to the insurrection at the Capitol. The extreme/ supreme court will protect Trump. However, many of his supporters are in jail for believing his lies.

  • @tylermalone4768
    @tylermalone4768 Месяц назад +1

    No and we should make positive changes

  • @astrafaan
    @astrafaan Месяц назад

    Not a problem - maybe the BBC could send over Aaronovitch to deal with him in his own inimitable manner . Hardly the goto broadcaster to get an impartial view of this situation now is it? 😂

  • @viktor_with_a_k828
    @viktor_with_a_k828 Месяц назад +7

    So ambassadors and diplomatic staff above the law?
    That's not new. Don't act like one.

    • @cosplayshop
      @cosplayshop Месяц назад

      It's different. First of all, law applies to diplomatic staff, whether a country choose to execute that law is up to its own standard. Japan had jailed US Service Member and diplomatic staff before, it's depends on the exchange agreement
      President Immunity is "Blanket" which cover EVERYTHING. As long as it's in official capacity, it's going to be covered.

  • @phild5034
    @phild5034 Месяц назад

    No.

  • @logiclust
    @logiclust Месяц назад +13

    biden should dismiss the SCOTUS and re-appoint. Biden can now stay in office past Jan 6

    • @Wandererbane
      @Wandererbane Месяц назад

      Except no one would be willing to fight for Biden to illegally stay in power. Meanwhile half the country would gladly go to war to put Trump in office if he wins

    • @michelletubbs4779
      @michelletubbs4779 Месяц назад

      You’re IGNORANT!

    • @MrFancyFingers
      @MrFancyFingers Месяц назад +4

      @GillMunchen-m6h
      I think your orange knee pads are too tight.

    • @ronfhs58
      @ronfhs58 Месяц назад +2

      I don't think that he can get rid of the current justices, but he can appoint as my of them as he wants or assign 6 of them to an advisory board worth one vote collectively and appoint 5 new ones. Just gotta be creative. You can find precedent for court expansion, not that precedent actually matters now.

    • @simulationkoyo
      @simulationkoyo Месяц назад

      yes it is official as long as Biden says it is. According to their decision lol.

  • @misterfunnybones
    @misterfunnybones Месяц назад +2

    “I think that I just feel like a young man, I’m so young. I can’t believe it, I’m the youngest person.” - Trump😂

    • @catherinemacaskill1421
      @catherinemacaskill1421 Месяц назад

      Trump is completely deranged and delusional. That alone is frightening. What is scarier is the fact that the Republican clownocracy, the right wing propaganda media sites and his followers are as deranged and delusional as he is.

  • @bboopster942
    @bboopster942 Месяц назад

    Yes, watching on RUclips.

  • @adriennehess6517
    @adriennehess6517 Месяц назад

    Its ridiculous...no president should be above the law! This whole shit show with Trump thats been going on forever...is getting tiring. He's not in the best interest of America.

  • @fix24politics
    @fix24politics Месяц назад

    Yes, President can do anything if he is my party!!!! What kind of logic is that????

  • @lnj0355
    @lnj0355 Месяц назад

    The Agency has been above the law long before 9/11

  • @mrc0157
    @mrc0157 Месяц назад +7

    Not even King's could behave like ze Drumpf....

  • @martinvtodd9502
    @martinvtodd9502 Месяц назад

    This ruling's greatest threat is what James Madison warned about how the greatest trend towards tyranny could rezide in the office of executive of the ambition to go to war continually, without Congress, which presidents routinely do now in violation of the Constitution. ( Goggle James Madison speech on continuel war be the greatest threat to Liberty.)

  • @HoaDuong-yo8jc
    @HoaDuong-yo8jc Месяц назад +1

    Yes,this President joe a bove the law !!!

  • @nicolascevallos2244
    @nicolascevallos2244 Месяц назад

    have any US president be criminal prosecuted with war crimes, mass surveillance, etc ?

  • @beebee_0136
    @beebee_0136 Месяц назад +3

    Elephant in the room: Given that some sections of Americans are obsessed about the SCOTUS ruling, describing it as a essentially making the president a king?
    So, what does that make the realm of England? Doesn't look like they are doing too badly, are they?

    • @50lbhead30
      @50lbhead30 Месяц назад +8

      Possibly the dumbest train of thought on the internet today

    • @polygonalmasonary
      @polygonalmasonary Месяц назад +2

      Please do your research before leaving such a dumb answer 🙄🙄🙄🇬🇧🙏🌈♥️

    • @lemonhaze1506
      @lemonhaze1506 Месяц назад +1

      @@polygonalmasonary shut up bot

    • @nightlightabcd
      @nightlightabcd Месяц назад

      I can tell that you to support Trump's/Putin's coup against the US! You really are that ignorant, stupid and naive, a good republican! A real Trump supporter!!

    • @catherinemacaskill1421
      @catherinemacaskill1421 Месяц назад

      Obviously beebee doesn't know anything about history or the role of the British monarchy. Kinda sad but not unusual.

  • @DannyGoLively
    @DannyGoLively Месяц назад +11

    Right now, I'd kinda like King Charles to be our president...

    • @4362mont
      @4362mont Месяц назад +3

      Charles the First...

    • @_Reviewer
      @_Reviewer Месяц назад +1

      King Charles would make a good King. He is not corrupt like Trump.

    • @Rhubarb-ob5fj
      @Rhubarb-ob5fj Месяц назад +1

      Ugh...no

  • @kellyhassen8071
    @kellyhassen8071 Месяц назад

    BBC NEEDS TO RUN YOUR COUNTRY.

  • @pretty5793
    @pretty5793 Месяц назад +3

    Supreme Court has laid the path for America to end democracy. It is so sad!

  • @joevaldivia6733
    @joevaldivia6733 Месяц назад

    Good information, thank you

  • @macroman52
    @macroman52 Месяц назад +1

    Alister Cooke, in one of his letters from America, made the case that the US constitution gave the President the powers and status of the only King the 18th century colonists knew well, King George, except that the Prez was subject to being deposed by elections or impeachment by Congress. It was an accident of history, Cooke claimed, that the US constitution was written at a time where the British King and British parliament had roughly equal powers. The written US constitution preserved those powers over time in the US. In the UK parliament went on to increase its power and reduce the Monarch's power. So I think Cooke would not be surprised at all that SCOTUS (which wants to remain in the 18th century) ruled that the Prez has similar immunity as the Monarch of the UK still has.

  • @earnestequivocation6250
    @earnestequivocation6250 Месяц назад +2

    This is deeply concerning. We are of course way past the point where the US was regarded as leader if the free world - Jan 6 was the final in the coffin in that regard.
    But this really is next level dismantling of democracy.

    • @craven5328
      @craven5328 Месяц назад

      Agreed. There's no walking this back, for at least possibly decades. There is no way around this now - what was once abuse of office is now just "official". Democracy in America is on life support, as hurricanes approach it's coast...

  • @wmbrice
    @wmbrice Месяц назад

    very helpful commentary, thank you!

  • @joelcawthon1365
    @joelcawthon1365 Месяц назад

    poor misinformed democrats, so sad

  • @user-mt1xc1em4s
    @user-mt1xc1em4s Месяц назад +2

    King Biden step up and demand we uphold the Constitution and remove trump the ballot NOW !!😮😮

  • @malcomlahey5065
    @malcomlahey5065 Месяц назад

    If the President did something questionable it would go to the Supreme Court and have it sanctioned.

  • @roxanereddy2471
    @roxanereddy2471 Месяц назад

    Everyone needs to watch: July 8th, 2024; The Lincolin Project ; aftermath

  • @50lbhead30
    @50lbhead30 Месяц назад

    There are no levers here

  • @zacharythomas8617
    @zacharythomas8617 Месяц назад

    As an citizen of America from the state of Illinois. I must respectfully ask anyone from Great Britain. What is a King?

    • @binkwillans5138
      @binkwillans5138 Месяц назад

      Not sure we ever had one. We had a damn fine Queen, RIP.

  • @ne1uno
    @ne1uno Месяц назад

    Article 1 sec 3 clause 7 of the constiturion says the president is not immune

    • @AncientttimeZ
      @AncientttimeZ Месяц назад +1

      According to Joe Biden, illegals are above the law!

  • @ErnestoRamirez-hi7xx
    @ErnestoRamirez-hi7xx Месяц назад

    As a Pastor, you people are making mistakes, because you put your hand above the Holy Scriptures, but you don’t read it. No man is above the law not even angels ( Ezekiel 28:14-19 ). The person you are seeing here is the well known ( satan ) God did not made it evil, he was a high ranked angel a (Cherub) and he transgressed the law he knew cause of his pride . Here you a perfect example “ no one is above the law. Now one thing is breaking the law, and another committing a transgression against the law; a law breaker doesn’t know the law but a person that understand and know the law and break it,it becomes a transgressor of the law ( 1st Timothy 2:14 ) like Donald Trump. So on to when the Supreme Court is going to keep on giving immunity to a man, so he may take a position as a President which he is no longer worthy of exercise it. If the Supreme Court of the United state of America can’t no longer judge that we need New leadership in the Supreme Court of the United state of America. Donald Trump is not a King he’s a Transgresor of The Law.

  • @megacandlelite
    @megacandlelite Месяц назад

    Powerful ...Now Repent Sincerely 🛐✝️

  • @DrNancyLivingCoCreatively
    @DrNancyLivingCoCreatively Месяц назад

    Great kick off question. Congratulations on UK labor success. I doubt it will help him. I'm worried about their takeover of agencies FDA, CDC, EPA and more. I smell Project 2025.

  • @MrDfansler
    @MrDfansler Месяц назад

    Yes, but it won't last!

  • @mrscpjones16
    @mrscpjones16 Месяц назад +2

    People vote this November 2024. Register early and vote. Vote for Democrats straight ticket up and down ballot.

  • @billyrubano8268
    @billyrubano8268 Месяц назад +1

    Why does no one understand we have congress to prosecute the president for official acts lol

  • @janetwann5578
    @janetwann5578 Месяц назад

    He shouldn't be

  • @AldrianCG
    @AldrianCG Месяц назад +1

    In “bananero” countries they are. Welcome us to the club. 👍🏼

  • @user-mk9lt8kz3f
    @user-mk9lt8kz3f Месяц назад +3

    The fact that the BBC is weighing in on this at all is hilarious.

  • @deledare2837
    @deledare2837 Месяц назад

    The answer is yes and no. Based on the 3 for and 3 withdrawal 😂

  • @vph7
    @vph7 Месяц назад

    It’s weird to put faces to the voices lol

  • @titteryenot4524
    @titteryenot4524 Месяц назад +5

    At this point I don’t give a sh*t he is ‘above the law’. All I care about is we have a dollally 81 year old with his finger on the trigger. 🤦‍♂️

    • @maryfrump7937
      @maryfrump7937 Месяц назад

      JOE is not someone to start a war. Dump on the otherhand wants to shoot protesters.

    • @jasonbarnett7747
      @jasonbarnett7747 Месяц назад

      So you admit that you don't care that you just destroyed the Constitution

  • @jamesgarrett5218
    @jamesgarrett5218 Месяц назад +1

    All presidential acts within the law cannot be prosecuted. Immunity does not apply to non-official acts that violate statutory law.

  • @gailseatonhumbert
    @gailseatonhumbert Месяц назад +2

    3 co-equal branches doesn't apply anymore according to the BBC's analysis.

  • @jimharrow8104
    @jimharrow8104 Месяц назад

    Liberal tears 😭...

  • @keithlillis7962
    @keithlillis7962 Месяц назад

    This is from the conclusion of the actual ruling:
    "First, with respect to any criminal conduct relating to a President’s “core constitutional powers”-those subjects
    “within his ‘conclusive and preclusive’ constitutional authority”-the President is entitled to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution. See ante, at 6, 8.
    Second, expanding outward from this “core,” regarding all other “acts
    within the outer perimeter of [the President’s] official responsibility,” the President is entitled to “at least a presumptive immunity from criminal prosecution.” Ante, at 14
    "
    And the ruling also states presidential communications or motives cannot be used against him/her in 'core' duties' Giving pardons is a core duty, so Trump could, (and probably will) take brides for pardons, if re-elected in November.

  • @karthy257
    @karthy257 Месяц назад

    Welcome to socialist state propaganda from BBC

  • @HenkyMizella
    @HenkyMizella Месяц назад

    *Coz Bye- den!

  • @GC2024_
    @GC2024_ Месяц назад

    DJT CUT HIS TEETH IN COURT!! THIS MAN IS WAY TO SMART WHEN IT COMES TO COURT!! BUT GOOD LUCK 🤣😂🤣😂🤣
    TRUMP2024 MAGA

  • @notjustforhackers4252
    @notjustforhackers4252 Месяц назад +2

    The British parliament are so why not?

    • @RealUlrichLeland
      @RealUlrichLeland Месяц назад

      No they aren't, members of parliament are investigated by the police all the time. Nicola Sturgeon and Boris Johnson both have been recently.

  • @tomhenry897
    @tomhenry897 Месяц назад

    Biden says he is

  • @GTRRR_
    @GTRRR_ Месяц назад +1

    🤨🤔

  • @garyrust9055
    @garyrust9055 Месяц назад

    I wonder if I am right:
    The Congress watches the Supreme Court and Visa Versa.
    The Supreme Court is Advisory Only. They have no
    prosecutorial power as an extension under the Internal
    Justice System.They may not write laws or pass
    mandates to lower courts. Lower courts function through
    the Attorney Generals Office (which is above the Congress)
    through the Bureau Of Land Management and the
    Department Of Defense. These are the branches of the
    Justice System. Ratification of law is only done by the
    Internal Justice System and Vetoing mandates is the
    prerogative of the President. The President and Vice
    President may request laws to be written, but may not write
    them themselves. Maybe this is just wishful thinking. I hope not.

  • @leemccabemccabe5627
    @leemccabemccabe5627 Месяц назад

    OMG.NHS Trust ✝️ 🇬🇧 pray

  • @Robert_Douglass
    @Robert_Douglass Месяц назад

    "The Buck Stops Here." Thus said Harry Truman, I believe.
    But whoever said it was wrong, because the buck doesn't stop with the current President -- it stops with every following President, who will all judge the incumbent President for his or her actions in office.

  • @MohdAli-qb3jw
    @MohdAli-qb3jw Месяц назад

    How long will it not be done and put an end to these games that you promote in your store, until when is the fraud and cheating by the games. Who protects the rights of players and children. Who protects humans from these fraudulent companies! Where are the rights that you are talking about? Why is a supervisory body put in place for such digital gangs that make millions unjustly?

  • @joelcawthon1365
    @joelcawthon1365 Месяц назад

    Trump 2024 and beyond !!!!

  • @PallSall
    @PallSall Месяц назад +1

    Such division. I see why it all ends now. Funny and sad at the dame time.

  • @jonncockrell3606
    @jonncockrell3606 Месяц назад +1

    Its called a Dictator.

  • @maje9448
    @maje9448 Месяц назад

    lands

  • @ibrahimumarlawan1845
    @ibrahimumarlawan1845 Месяц назад

    ❤ American ❤❤ BBC

  • @robertchesky277
    @robertchesky277 Месяц назад

    God leftists are dense.

  • @justaghoulintheworld
    @justaghoulintheworld Месяц назад

    All hail Biden the eternal leader of the USA.

  • @ironyelegy
    @ironyelegy Месяц назад

    Yall think you have any right

  • @marytillman-johnson9825
    @marytillman-johnson9825 Месяц назад +1

    We separated from Great Britain that's the only play I know of kings. The Boston Tea Party took care of that. I would like to see a bill go forward to vote on lifetime appointments for Supreme Court Judges, that is too much power with no replication is truly dangerous It's time to back over the United States of America.

  • @nardo218
    @nardo218 Месяц назад +1

    at this point i'd almost be willing to let trump out of jailtime if he'd just go away. slink back to mar-a-lago, on probation, and live out his last, what, 5 or 10 years tops?

  • @ucan1
    @ucan1 Месяц назад

    Ask Americans and not us

  • @user-sq4jz9up6g
    @user-sq4jz9up6g Месяц назад

    Long Live King Trump Go home Brits you can't even vote here

  • @ardiii746
    @ardiii746 Месяц назад +9

    Vote Blue 💙💙💙 BIDEN 2024 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸