Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Civil War Richmond: The Civil War in Four Minutes
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 сен 2018
- Mike Gorman of the Richmond National Battlefield Park details the happenings in and around Richmond, Virginia during the Civil War, including why Richmond became the capital of the South, Confederate leaders that called the city home and the Union's two campaigns against the capital city.
Learn More About Experiencing Richmond's History: www.battlefiel...
![Chuckyy - Devil Hours [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f3wZGj0VnZU/mqdefault.jpg)
That was great. A lively, well spoken, probably improvised, but performed from memory oration. I was there a few years ago and love the place. Those islands, the shops, the statues, the history! What a place.
For the record, I am not opposed to a full length documentary by you all! I'd be a huge supporter!!!
thanks. well done. enjoyed it.
An excellent summary in a short time. I had not heard the "industrial capital" argument before - Birmingham was a much safer capital city.
My my my some of you RUclips commenters are hilarious spewing off theories plucked randomly from your bums. Birmingham AL didn't even exist until 1871. It was all farmland! LOL Absolutely comical.
I think he meant Montgomery AL
Any chance of more Animated Battles in the future?
I think it's fascinating to see the landscape then an what's on the landscape now I was just in Richmond yesterday an I can see all the old civil war houses that people live in today right off of broad st
god bless america the union is safe
Jon Dillon And to enslave millions of people who did not want to be apart of them?
Your free to join just not free to leave
@@thepeps021 you got that right USA USA USA
@@Boooooooooo541 who captured and sold the slaves to begin with?
What an amazing video.
Great job! Very passionate!
Reading "Himself" by William Donahue, so looked up Richmond to give some context. Thank you
when sherman said he knew the southern people which he did and the war would be long and brutal they thought him insane until he proved them wrong
First and as always loving it
Thanks. 😊
Grant knew Lee's army was marching shoeless and supply poor. He also knew Lee had a recruiting problem he didn't. The idea of another capital sounds logical. But I'm not Jefferson Davis or Lee. The war was over in late 1863 after Gettysburg and the Gettysburg Address where Lincoln offered the best terms for both sides. The South could have been paid value for slaves under Eminent Domain, a put forward before hostilities by Lincoln, and still controlled the population as "sharecroppers" which is a "company store" curse. Instead another 150,000 (?) Lives were lost.
Mention also blockade runners were smuggling in fashion's and luxuries instead of war necessities. The war was a lost cause for the South after November, 1863.
Indeed the war wasn’t over at Gettysburg by a damned sight that’s kind idiotic in grants murderous overland campaign Lee could have entrapped the main union army and destroyed it dealing a fatal blow to the union which would surely break their will to go on however by miss communication and bad luck Lee was not able to do the plan
Can we get an animated battle for Richmond?
We have a set of shorter ones that go together, starting here ruclips.net/video/oDhki6oyQiM/видео.html
Amazing video it was fair and balanced
And we will do it again
Don't all wars start with empty promises of a soon victorious end???
runaway crisis? 1863?
nobody
the subtitles: aH YeS RusSiAn
fr, and the captions for me dont even work
Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis were born 60 miles apart in Kentucky; a border state
Washington DC was in the South! The mistake the Confederacy made was to not follow up on that first battle of Bull Run
Montgomery, Alabama used to be Confederacy's capital Before Richmond was.
For like a few months gtfo Alabama did not do nothing for the confederacy
Anyone here interested in the fellow that made boots for the confederates in Richmond and started the longest running shoe company in U.S. history at 169 yrs? Come on over, ignore silly hair, trying to be fun.
The agrarian economy and it's lesser troop numbers of the South could not hold back the progressive industrial economy of the north with its burgeoning immigrants
And perhaps the railroad won the war
An aristocracy arose amongst large plantation owners in the South and their very livelihood was threatened by a growing abolitionist movement
... And so slave labor lost to wage labor🥸
Ironically overall this amounted to a greater struggle and a much lower quality of life for most former slaves
It was a war between two economys
Slavery just happened to be a central institution of the one
Wow, those confederates sure were a disorganized bunch.
Yeah it only took the Union Army 4 years to beat this "disorganized bunch" (/s). Sounds like the same conception about the Viet Cong.
Jason C this guy is trolling
@@jasonc2334 They were badly disorganized, poorly focused but highly belligerent. You know the type. Good at being destructive, worthless at anything else.
@@nora22000 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Who is the spaz boy who's trying to narrate this historic event? As a veteran , I wouldn't want to have somebody like this next to me in in a combat situation. My God I cannot handle people like that.
Do you not watch TV or RUclips? That’s how the hosts usually talk.
Long live the Confederacy and God bless those who gave their lives for its cause.
three cheers for slavers and those who defended it, am I right!
Jan Warriner The Confederacy is long dead, and deservedly so. The stated cause was the preservation of slavery, and God very obviously did not bless that effort.
kktg5099 Perhaps you should re-read the OP. I don’t see how you can reconcile condemnation of US racism while defending a post praising the Confederacy and it’s cause - the preservation of slavery.
nah.
the confederacy SPECIFICALLY EXISTED as a cornerstone for white supremacy and African chattel slavery.
The US itself didn't, although it doesn't live to the lofty ideals it sets for itself.
kktg5099 The Confederates clearly and unequivocally stated their reason for secession was the preservation of slavery. The “self-determination” they sought was the continuation of slavery. If you are ignorant of the Confederate Constitution, the various declarations of secession published by the Confederate states and the infamous “Cornerstone Speech” issued by the Confederate Vice President, then I suggest you educate yourself before continuing to defend the morally indefensible. The OP does indeed praise the cause of slavery, even if done in ignorance.
One can honor the Confederate soldiers while decrying the cause; the OP clearly failed to separate these.
SLOW DOWN YOUR TALKING 👄....PLEASE