DINGO TUTORIAL | ASSEMBLY
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 май 2023
- DINGO is every enthusiastic aviator's dream come true.
Website DINGO Support - www.dingosupport.eu/
Website EN - www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/
Website CZ - www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo/
Follow us on:
DINGO Aviators fb - / dingoaviators 
Развлечения
Thank's for not having glitzy music. Very straight forward build.
This is such a cool airplane design I wish I had the finances and space to build this but I will definitely be building a scale RC version .
RC DINGO KIT is almost ready :) you can find more info here: facebook.com/groups/dingoaviators/ or www.dingosupport.eu or www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/
A bi-plane flies really well, I flew an ag cat and it felt wonderful, very different to a mono-plane.
You have a point! :)
awsome work ,sir.best of luck.
Clearly a well thought out engineering project Well done. !
Thank you :)
Show , fantástico !!!!!!!!!!!
Bravo!
Just beautiful ❤
Thank you for share
Neat idea on tailwheel suspension.
Thank you :)
Красота
Excellent/ Orchestrated assembly; but the aft wing mount bolt should be foreword/ head fwd, and Should have wing gap seal added to upper side of upper wing and bottom of lower wing. Very Kool, reminds me of wood wing ding from the 70s!.
See more info here: www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/ and www.dingosupport.eu/
Didn't use a drill stop for those shallow T.E. holes. Concerned about drill starts into the inside lower surface of the red trailing edge.
3:38 that lock wire is not quite right...
Many things are not quite right
Bolts on the compression rubbers :50 should be long enough for a couple threads past the nut.
Looks like a very well engineered ultra light. Is it in part 103 category? Available in USA? The wing struts seem like the forgotten part of the clean build/engineering of this craft; at least need some streamlining. Has this craft been tested structurally and flight tested through full envelope? Specs available? This is obviously a more sophisticated Whing Ding build.
Yes, it is available for USA as Part 103 aircraft. It was developed same engineering team which is part of the engineering team for certified aircraft as well as the DINGO was structurally tested. More info here: www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/
This plane looks cool, but the lockwire technique?
Very similar to the Whing Ding II
I want one !!! Beautiful !!! 😠😎
You can have one! www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/ all info there :)
Looks like the winding 2 👍👍
The full story about Wing Ding and DINGO is here: www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/
its my dream too... to build a airplane myself and fly it...
RC DINGO KIT is almost ready :) you can find more info here: facebook.com/groups/dingoaviators/ or www.dingosupport.eu or www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/
Is the rudder and wing covering similar in any way to model airplane monokote? Thicker I'm sure.
Yes, it is a similar system. Materials which can be used are Ceconite or ORATEX.
In the Future I would hope you would be clever enough to limit your close up shots, zoom out, and do a voice over to explain what you are doing step by step. That would make it a good video!
You can see all supported documentation including pdf manuals, 3D model available for free here: www.dingosupport.eu/
what and how thick is the material used to cover the wings?
For the aircraft in video the Ceconite lite was used: www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/cspages/ceconitefabric2.php
Excellent build! I thought biplanes were done with after WWII because of the extra drag and weight of the bottom wing.
They were done after WW-ONE, not WW2, yes, because of unnecessary drag and other aerodynamic deficiencies. That said, if one doesn't care about drag, they still have positive features.
biplanes do have advantages tho, the lift to wingspan ratio is unmatched, resulting in incredible roll rate and the fact that they are connected with struts make biplane wings incredibly stiff and sturdy. if you don't want to fly fast they are the superior design
Fokker even went for a triplane design with their DR-1 resulting in unmatched low speed maneuverability. Baron v. Richthofen the famous "Red Baron" scored many hits in his DR-1, it was a very capable air superiority fighter
The triplane didn't have wires, it had cantilever wings so the drag was quite a bit less than it otherwise would have had. @@theflotheflo
They do however have incredible strength to weight for the wings, since they are made as a truss bridge is made. Biplanes did last until WW2 in many designs, such as the British Albatross torpedo bomber that brought an end to the Bismarck, and the American Grumman F3f2 Navy fighter on line until 1941. Many pilots of WW1 refused to fly monoplanes. They were slow to catch on as too many were collapsing and killing the pilots. If you notice many early monoplanes had extensive wire bracing because wing spar technology was not easy. Probably the first high performance unbraced monoplane came from Hugo Junkers of Germany. but few others had much success as people were afraid of wings that weren't braced. Even more modern monoplanes like the cub, the cessna line of civil planes need strut bracing. Biplanes are inherently so strong many are rated aerobatic.
Will there be an option for scratch build plans?
Hello, the DINGO as it is prepared technology hole-to-hole can be built in 250 h by an experienced builder. That is the reason why we do not offer the plans and only kits because it is more price/time effective than building it from zero.
What is the price of the total kit for the Dingo. I went to the website but there is no mention of price?
Hello, you will find the price on our website when you scroll down and even price for shipping. www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/
-> KIT ready to be built by technology „hole to hole“ - 12 204 EUR excl. VAT and taxes.
The price does not include the engine, propeller, cover material, instruments and shipping.
Яка його вага без мотора
why all the rivets, wouldn't welding be easier and better ?
it would have been nice to see it fly
You can see it! :) here: ruclips.net/p/PL7KT5Z0jidh0XrwZ4SaINPSSP3cJSBLsh&si=N5yL2KH_vw6JsQoW playlist shows a lot of flying! :)
A Embraer tem de entrar nesse mercado num país continental como Brasil...
DINGO se entrega puerta a puerta en todo el mundo a través de la empresa DHL :)
Cool only takes 32 minutes to build
Puede ser fácil pero tienes que ser muy meticuloso. A con A y. B con B . Nadie quiere ver un avión desmontadose mientras lo estás volando.
Me: now I know there aren't extra bolts.
Sorry to be critical but I would have de-burred the holes.
Video tutorials only help the builder imagine the process. Each step operation is done by each builder by him/herself in the best quality he/she can achieve.
Yeah as an old A&P, that just made me squirm!
Hope you deburred all the drilled holes,,,,,,,,,
How much would this one cost?
KIT ready to be built by technology „hole to hole“ - 12 204 EUR excl. VAT and taxes. (the year 2023)
The price does not include the engine, propeller, cover material, instruments and shipping. More info here www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/
Thank you very much. I'll check out the information
@@futurevehicless.r.o.4896 С ДВС и пропеллером!!! И Вдвое дешевле!!! А то придут ВАГНЕР!! Сыграют краковяк в Присядку!!! И ....
I've flown many an ultralight. However, I would never fly anything named 'Dingo!'
There is more behind why it is called DINGO. Let's check it out here: www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/
Trust us, once you fly DINGO, you will love DINGO :)
it's a cheesy looking tail will looks like somebody stole it off a baby carriage
no suspension, better land soft
Yep. I’m sure they spec a low air pressure for bump absorption. Lots of light aircraft have done that.
To much wire it goes well to washed clothes !
Good point! We need to try :D
Dinky toys ? Pounding a threaded bolt thru…. ?? Wow😮
DINGO is sold as a KIT. It is up to the builder how he will assembly it :) You can find more info here: www.dingosupport.eu
Looks nice... but your building techniques are very sketchy.
I only saw you use 1 castle nut with a cotter pin, all the other nuts were nylon. And no other cotter pins anywhere. All of the nuts should have been castle's with cotter pins.
The only safety wire you used on the horizontal stab attachment bolt, you wired on the wrong side of the bolt head
Causing the bolt to get loose, not tighten the way its supposed to.
Other than that, it's a great looking aircraft
Hello, thank you for your comment. If you study the regulation, then you will find the following paragraph, which is taken from higher regulation EASA - CS23 Amendment 4.:
CS 23.607 Fasteners
c) No self-locking nut may be used on any bolt subject to rotation in operation unless a nonfriction locking device is used in addition to the self-locking device.
The bolts you see in the control system, for instance, are not rotating. The rotation is secured by spherical bearings (rod-ends) mounted on push-pull rods.
The connection you have mentioned: The elevator pin is secured by cotter pins because it needs to be disassembled for transportation, and in this case, the consumption of nylon nuts would be high.
Please look closely at aircraft certified under the CS23 or FAR23 in different categories. The best examples are:
(ULL category - P92 Echo MkII - Nylon nuts) tecnam.com/aircraft/#all
CS-23, FAR23
P2010 - Nylon nuts (single engine) tecnam.com/aircraft/#all
EXTRA 330SC - Nylon nuts (Unlimited aerobatic Single-seat aircraft single engine) www.extraaircraft.com/330SC.php
P2012 - Nylon nuts (Twin engine) tecnam.com/aircraft/#all
P2012 STOL - Castle nut with a cotter pin (Twin engine) tecnam.com/aircraft/#all
The difference is in the level of commercial operations, such as POB, regular maintenance, and quality of maintenance.
DINGO - the main reason we have used the nylon nuts is because the builders and maintenance can forget to put the cotter pin, and then the nut is not secured anymore. There is no regulation for this aircraft category, so the aircraft is not maintained under the certified organisation.
@futurevehicless.r.o.4896 thank you for the specs. I Learned something new tonight.
It'll never fly! Not without a propellor!
Летает?
Building the better mousetrap think far 103 needs to allow for the weight of 300 lbs empty weight ...46 lbs of" beef" added would really really go a long way to building a far better mouse trap...seeing parts FAR way too under strength. Sign the petition 300 lb empty weight for land planes...would save many lives!
You can find more information about our company and our projects here: www.futurevehicles.eu/en/. If you have any further questions, please let us know :)
I noticed a remark about fiber locks. They've been legal in the US for a long time, even on moving parts. I don't like it, but that's why preflights are so important. I did notice torque stripes being added to the rudder bolts/nuts. That helps with the preflight.
I would also check everything together then remove, Deburr, clean, THEN rivet.
I would love to fly this thing. It could be a winner.
@@terryboehler5752 stop by during AirVenture 2024 in Oshkosh. DINGO is going to be there and Rick will be happy to have a chat with you. If you have any detail questions please do not hesitate to contact us via email:
jan.jilek@futurevehicles.eu
rick@bluffcityaircraft.com
for god's sake, buy a power riveter
LES VOY A REGALAR UNA BROCHA NO ESCUPAN NI PASEN LA MANO SOLO RALLAN LA PINTURA 😂
Sorry to piss on your parade but the work showcased here does not reflect proffesionally trained aviation technicians. Not 1 torque wrench was used, many critical fasteners held in place with fiberlock nuts instead of castle nuts and cotterpins, driving in bolts with a hammer is a no no. I could keep going on. I work on certified aircraft and am a licensed aircraft mechanic so maybe I’m over critical
You can t COMPAR.........Professionnal plane....with that....AND IT IS NOT THE SAME PRICE.....any way it s very interesting..(to funky)
It is not a Boeing !
It looks flimsy, anycase.
It's part 103. Totally different world to what you work in. In the US, you don't even need a licence to fly it!
I got your point FunkyBass, even if it's not a certified aircraft, it's experimental class, it wouldn't be difficult to use the "right aeronautical stuff" such as castle nuts, and a torque wrench to get an "extra margin" of safety.... Airline pilot here, not a mechanic, but I do agree with you!
Will it eat my baby?
:D :D :D
Active death assist to fly that crap….built by total ********!😮
We haven't met yet but let's get to know each other :) Please have a look and go through our website and learn more about our team and projects: www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/
Ha, now I see what it is. A hoovey Wing Ding!. Update system , not wood! Gpx
And you can see more here:
www.futurevehicles.eu/dingo-en/
and
www.dingosupport.eu/
and
ruclips.net/p/PL7KT5Z0jidh0XrwZ4SaINPSSP3cJSBLsh&si=N5yL2KH_vw6JsQoW