KERENSKY INTERVIEW - SOUND
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 окт 2024
- (31 Dec 1931) KERENSKY INTERVIEW - SOUND
Find out more about AP Archive: www.aparchive.c...
Twitter: / ap_archive
Facebook: / aparchives
Instagram: / apnews
You can license this story through AP Archive: www.aparchive.c...
It's interesting that Kerensky lived until 1970, far outliving either Lenin or Stalin.
He was younger than both.
@@beback_ Lenin was born in 1870, Stalin in 1878 and Kerensky in 1881
@Холст Масло His Government was provisional. It was never meant to last.
@@user-bm5om8xf5cHe was too stupid to be dictator.
The living standards in the West were - and still are - far higher than the living standards in Russia.
Neither the Bolsheviks, nor the current dictators cared about the well-being of the people.
an active participant of the revolution, the head of the Russian Republic in 1917, he lived to see The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, the flight of Gagarin and man on the moon. that's mind blowing
Take it further. Vera Konstantinovna Romanova, born at the beginning of the 20th century, great-granddaughter of Nicholas 1, and niece of Nicholas 2. She survived the revolution, the Soviet Union, the entire 20th century, and died in 2002. She outlived most of the members of the House of Romanov. She was the oldest Romanov in the 21st century. She could even become empress if the monarchy were restored. According to all laws, she alone could ascend the throne.
A date of the speech would help. Help me anyway. I guess the interview was recorded in England, UK. But who was he talking to? Was that gfilm by the BBC or other group? TY for posting.
yeah same im trying to do this for my coursework
Michael Greenwood расстреляю
It was recorded in Melbourne Australia I’m right
Michael Greenwood
I think it was 1931
It says in the description of the video 31 Dec. 1931
Kaiserreich
MR KERENSKY GET DOWN! NOO HE CANT HEAR US HES WEARING AIRPODS
MR KERENSKY NOOOOO
Alexander Kerensky completely underestimated the ruthlessness and drive of the Bolsheviks for power in Oct 1917. It is all the more mesmerizing because he and Lenin both studied law in Simbirsk, and even then it should have been apparent how cunning / determined / radical and sly Lenin as a character really was. Moderate Revolutionaries tend always underestimate their radical opponents, only to then realize their mistake when its already too late. In fact the Provisional Govt ( composed of moderate Socialists, Centrists and Liberal minded Aristocrats) was too weak and also too beholden to what Russia's allies in WWI wanted. The army was at breaking point if not in disarray and massive food and ammunition supply shortage issues significantly undermined whatever credibility the Prov government still had, playing right into the hands of the radical Bolsheviks whose main aim was to consolidate their revolution and sway the masses by stating ": Bread Peace Land for the People". Even during the October revolution of 1917 the Prov government didn't fight against the Bolsheviks and didn't clamor to maintain power, making it easy for a relatively bloodless coup d'etat to take place by a radicalized minority faction. Kerensky tried to summon loyal troops outside of St Petersburg to march on the capital but it became clear that the Bolsheviks weren't easily impressed, so it took another 5 years of a brutal civil war between Bolshevik Reds and Anti-Bolshevik Whites forces ( a mix of monarchists, centrists, right wing nationalists, moderate Marxists, Right wing Socialists, some Anarchists and some Peasant groups )to determine which way post Tsarist Russia would finally go. Keresenky was already in exile and watching events unfold from a distance.
Probably the most Russian English I have heard of. Not bad.
French accent
@@marguskiis7711 Really?
@@theparadigm8149 yep
@@marguskiis7711 Oh yeah, I just learned from Simon Whistler that he did live in Paris for some time
@@marguskiis7711 as a russian i can say that this accent is as russian as it gets
Напомнило как Максим Кац читает свои видео :)
This dude sent the Romanovs to Siberia rather than Livadia, Yalta in Crimea.
If he sent him to Crimea which was under the whites control later on and for a long time. Would’ve been interesting.
So he was in on the pact to kill the Romanovs.
I am reading the book "Ten days that shook the world", this speech is quite in keeping with the book - full empty of platitudes and insincerity from Kerensky. I recommend if anyone is interested in Russian Revolution.
It didn't even take Jon Reed a year after that to realize behind the myth of Bolshevism was nothing but autocratic tyranny. Before his death Reed was already lamenting to the people close to him. It took him even less time to realize the "bolshevik myth" than it did Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman.
Very good
Kerensky missed his chance by not negotiating a separate peace with the Germans. This would have pulled the rug out from under Lenin's feet. Before WWI Russia had the fastest growing industrial base - even faster than the US. Under Kerensky Russia was well on its way to becoming a productive free capitalist state -- If he had only ended the war. Lenin's victory plunged Russia into darkness that lasts to this day; I am amazed Russians still revere him.
I doubt it would improve the situation. It was the shame of the conclusion of a Lenin's separate peace with Germany that became the main reason why many of the Russians sided with the emerging White movement and made the Civil war so bloody and uncompromising. In addition, Kerensky himself was also a socialist, albeit not so radical, so it was not worth expecting normal capitalist reforms from him.
Kerensky was a socialist
Soviet propaganda made Lenin a great man, although later, by the way, Gorbachev used his works for his reforms. It turned out what happened.
@@mrgoogl7820 Gory did everything the opposite of Lenin)) come on. He pretty much swtiched from socialism to a state capitalism. Anyone who read any of Lenin's work would tell you this. How Gorby got away with this is beyong me. After 1991 Gorby was probably the only person in history that became hated by both, leftwing and rightwing. Both communists and anti-communists wanted to see him hanged))))
With Gorbachev they are the biggest losers of 20th century but with the long life. Kerensky lost almost everything to the Soviet regime and Gorbi lost everything due the desovietisation process. But they survived all the "winning" contemporaries.
the freemasons hold eachothers backs .USSR was about to become hi-tech they couldn't allow it and turned back the clock to the Romanoff dynasty and its symbolism which both Yeltsin and Putin stood for.
@@syntheticdawn4992 the Freemasons made the USSR lol.
@@themajesticstick5262 more like they wrecked it
Kerensky was a huge useful idiot for the Communists/Soviets. Thought he’d be the next ruler but his rule only lasted few months before he was ousted by the Commies lol. I’m just mad the Commies didn’t kill him off, probably his international ties and Freemason ranking saved his life.
@@syntheticdawn4992 They wrecked Russia and built the USSR.
Alexander Kerenskij has been Groningen up with Vladimir Uljanov-Lenin.Both has been studied in University of Kazan.Together
they didn't study together, Kerensky was a lot younger. I am sure they knew each other since both were revolutionaries.
Ахах настоящий русский акцент
He is reading.
Ai ai, kerenski
I like him. He has guts. He opposed the Bolsheviks head on and lived to tell about it.
Freemasons usually make it he practically handed power to lenin offering 0 resistance , see how he call people sheep..
You appear to have a limited understanding of history
The Russian Revolution would have been a new American Revolution which would have been just if they had listened to him and those like him in the provisional constitutional government rather than the bolsheviks. Russia needed revolution as did America before it from militiristic fascism which it never escaped from due to communism which is another form of centralized militiristic fascism
@@TheWordMercy82 Ahahah
@Uni BlackSister true
I thought he knew English well ... at least he should have known but, even though he doesn't speak English well, he still spoke the truth.
Dont forget that this spawn of the devil had himself contributed to the destruction of Russia.
Just because he said some anti-bolshevik stuff in no way makes him good.
@@freetime5803 It was a very long time ago, but today few people are especially interested in it. Much more interesting is the current spawn of the devil, known in the world as Huylo. There's every prerequisite to hope that this time he'll bury Russia completely.
@tungsten liver I Never Knew That Kerensky Flew To The United States After The 1917 October Revolution Took Place In Soviet Russia I Thought He Would've Been Executed And Tortured By The Bolsheviks Lead By Soviet Dictator Vladimir Lenin.
Really? All his statements are wrong. Democracy has never come to Russia. 5th year plan proven right to win over Wehrmacht. He is wrong on all accounts. And he was failed politician, when he ruled Russia, because of his lack of power of judgment.
The real menshevik
@Barrack Obama Vlogs he was SR actually
He was a mason.
@Barrack Obama Vlogs he was Socialist - Revolutionist.
He wasn't Menshevik. He was Socialist Revolutionary.
Миша, у тебя злые глаза
Ты имеешь ввиду Саша?
@@arsray7285возможно. А возможно это фраза из какого-то мема
Every interview with this guy is just a word salad))))) How the hell did he get so much power?
He is much more articulate and eloquent when he speaks Russian, I had the opportunity to listen to his interview in Russian and I found his speech quite pleasing to my ears despite his old age, I still don't understand why is his English like this
@@iwannabeyourdog4195 I've watched his so called "intervew" in Russian as well. It's even worse. An hour long monologue of an exteremely slow speech overloaded with unneeded details and lacking any kind of explainaition of what really happened. No real answers were given
0:06-1:08
Всё читает.Кто ему текст написал,интересно?
В Госдепе.
Рептилоиды
Who was his audience, he should have been speaking in Russian with subtitles?
He was exiled in the USA after the bolsheviks took power.
@@JavierSanchez-zj6su correction* he didn't flee after the bolsheviks took power he fleed when the provisional goverment collapsed and the civilwar started
@@K.Pershing true
He fucked up all by his own.
Обанкротившийся политик пытается делать лицо.
+++++++++++++++
A high illuminati,guy
He was a high level Freemason.
He is wrong is everything he says.
he talks a lot without saying anything specific))) it's like this with every interview he gave (at least the ones on youtube). how he ever became the head of a giant country is beyond me.
@@CoolGobyFish He was a great speaker in Russian so it's likely the his lacking speeches in english are due to the poor grasp of the english language.
@@ducksareurlords3782 he comes off even worse during his Russian interviews posted on youtube. he is literally a perfect example of: talks a lot, says nothing. Lenin rightfully called him an opportunist. I had a much better opinon of him BEFORE I saw these videos.
Жуткий английский!))) Стыдно слушать...
Ну видно не прижился русский человек за 10 лет в Америке
@@karlfranz459 Какой же он русский? И рядом не стоял...
@@РиммаХабарова-ж3е А кто же он, по-вашему?
@@yomer355 По нашему предатель.
@@РиммаХабарова-ж3е в первый раз слышу о такой национальности.
"The market of 160 million people."
Let this sink in. The current population of Russia is 150 million people.
Paints a perfect picture of what communism does to countries: enforced destitution.
The life expectancy has gone down, too. Under the Putin regime it's even lower than it was on the eve of the collapse of the communist regime.
Despotism and tyranny always fail and ruin everything they touch.
dude, the USSR had 14 other countries except modern Russia. The current population of that "market of 160 million" is close to 300 million - learn some history before you make idiotic points! 😂
And the Russian empire was far more destitute that the Soviet Union, which massively improved on many things , from housing to literacy, science and health care, so you're just plain wrong about your "destitution" comment.
Kerensky was by this point just a puppet of western interests, wrong on all accounts (including on the causes of the 1929-33 depression, as it had nothing to do with the "disappearance of the Russian market"), and mostly irrelevant. He was a provisional ruler at a time nobody wanted to assume power in Russia, a compromise between the Soviet and the old czarist Duma after the February revolution, not a leader who ever rose to prominence by his own merit or democratically, and it shows in just how indecisive he sounds and how easily swayed he was to abandon his forner socialist principles in the US...
The masonic mission was accomplished by brother Kerensky. Fully of happiness and relaxation, he'd delivered to his western bosses. He granted kommunism to the pure Russians but at the same time he presented himself the luxurious western live as a real v.i.p..
What a loathsome man he was. Sold out his country to the international Jews in exchange for power (and probably money). Opened his country to the death cult of communism that got millions of his country men and the imperial family slaughtered.😡
When he moved to the west he was working some time as librarian, what are you talking about?
@@countryhumans7897 "...some time .."
@@SC-gw8np what the hell are you talking about)) most of the industry before the February revolution was already owned by the foreign capital. Communists are the ones that kicked them out. Kerensky was a socialist. Imperial army didn't support Nicolas 2nd and took an oath to Russian Republic. There was not Imperial Army during the Communist Revolution or during the civil war. There was only a republican army that got split between the reds and the whites. Also, majority of the whites were NOT royalists. they didn't want the czar back in power. Every single white flag and coat of arms had republican symbols (the two headed eagle no longer had a crown and a septer)