What is XRF? | Optical Emission Spectroscopy explained

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 июл 2024
  • X-ray fluorescence or XRF is an analytical technique that has been used for many years to determine the elemental composition of a wide variety of materials. The technique involves X-rays that form part of the electromagnetic spectrum, they are expressed in terms of their energy (kilo electron volts - keV) or wavelength (nanometers - nm). XRF is a consequence of changes that take place within an atom. Examples include metal alloys, minerals, and petroleum products.
    XRF is typically used to analyze elements, from sodium (Na) to uranium (U), in concentrations spanning parts per million to high percentages in metal alloys, liquids like petroleum products, as well as powders, pastes, films, fibers, and other solids. It’s also commonly used for coating thickness analysis.
    Compared to other analytical techniques, XRF has many advantages. It's fast. It measures a wide range of elements and concentrations in many different types of materials. It's non-destructive and requires no or very little sample preparation, and it's low-cost compared to other techniques.
    Discover more about what is XRF: hhtas.net/3zO0txS
    Find out more about Hitachi's XRF analyzers: hhtas.net/3n2P85g
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 47

  • @theomoundzounga3855
    @theomoundzounga3855 10 месяцев назад +1

    Wouah well explained 👌, best video on XRF so far! I am covered. Thank you very much!

  • @user-lv4cm8fk2p
    @user-lv4cm8fk2p 5 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks! I am working on a essay about XRF and this video helped me so much!

  • @lgon9977
    @lgon9977 2 года назад +8

    Like the video guys! She's at gunpoint...

  • @krishnakantakonar683
    @krishnakantakonar683 2 года назад

    Greatly explained 🙏🙏

  • @flambojan_lab
    @flambojan_lab 6 месяцев назад

    Good explanation

  • @imranhaider8248
    @imranhaider8248 2 года назад

    Make a video on wdxrf as well. Explaining the function of analyzing crystal and collimator. Thanx

  • @markcrume
    @markcrume 3 года назад +1

    Great explanation. Thank you.

  • @ibrahimnazemqader9153
    @ibrahimnazemqader9153 6 лет назад +3

    Thanks

  • @chalpudeku7540
    @chalpudeku7540 6 лет назад

    Thank you

  • @DrAdeel969
    @DrAdeel969 4 года назад +1

    How to analyze the data after mapping from beamline?

  • @blacckgoete1020
    @blacckgoete1020 2 года назад

    Does mass of the sample have effect on the results after the analysis?

  • @divijmallela8444
    @divijmallela8444 2 года назад

    short and crisp

  • @kovoproxy
    @kovoproxy 2 года назад

    thank you Schatzi

  • @nikhilgoyal007
    @nikhilgoyal007 5 лет назад

    thanks

  • @mugemangangojeanbaptiste5720
    @mugemangangojeanbaptiste5720 5 лет назад

    Can u explain how to use it in tunnels not on the surtface

  • @multivitamin425
    @multivitamin425 4 года назад +5

    2:01 could've animated secondary radiation as moving outward and not inward, it may confuse people

  • @Vision267
    @Vision267 5 лет назад +2

    can this measure coating thicknesses in multiple layers?

  • @muratgultekin535
    @muratgultekin535 6 месяцев назад

    Wiil this xray show the difference between mild steel and chromoly
    And the thickness

  • @user-jd6cg5jz1n
    @user-jd6cg5jz1n 6 лет назад +1

    Thank you(@/@)!

  • @dharshdesign
    @dharshdesign 3 года назад +1

    how does this XRF works if I place a silver ball, that's wrapped with a 22K gold sheet? Will that detect the silver content thru that gold, or will detect only the purity of gold?

    • @dragondrago1740
      @dragondrago1740 3 года назад +2

      Am not an expert on the subject, but I assume that it will only measure the gold. XRF is used to measure atomes on the surface of materials and not in materials

    • @dookierotterdamski8949
      @dookierotterdamski8949 3 года назад +2

      @@dragondrago1740 it wil not penetrate enough to detect the silver ball it wil only go a few micro's in the base material

    • @susie2015
      @susie2015 Год назад

      XRF only detect the appearance 30um coat.

  • @nisrinebedroune9325
    @nisrinebedroune9325 4 года назад

    Bonjoure a toute stp j'ai besoin des thèses sur XRF

  • @jasonfoster5285
    @jasonfoster5285 2 года назад +1

    With all the charisma

    • @Bored_Trumpet
      @Bored_Trumpet 7 месяцев назад

      What you expect? Egghead afterall...

  • @saurabhchaudhary6630
    @saurabhchaudhary6630 4 года назад

    Thanku

  • @rlrrlrll
    @rlrrlrll 3 года назад +1

    At 1:44 wouldn't it be an electron from the outer shells that is excited (and certainly not removed)? Inner electrons are shielded by outer ones. The most inner electrons need the most work to remove them, as they are the closest to the core.

    • @Double0pi
      @Double0pi 3 года назад +1

      Nope. XRF removes core electrons. The outer electrons then "fall down" to the lower energy levels, emitting characteristic X-ray spectra as they go.

    • @rlrrlrll
      @rlrrlrll 3 года назад

      @@Double0pi Interesting! Never heard of that phenomenon before. I'll ask my prof about that :) thanks!

    • @Double0pi
      @Double0pi 3 года назад +4

      @@rlrrlrll Remember that different wavelengths of EM radiation have different energies. In gen chem, you learn that certain wavelengths are emitted when electrons move from an excited state down to a lower level. All of the wavelengths you calculate with the Rydberg equation are UV or visible light.
      Go down to a lower-energy sort of radiation--infrared--and you no longer have enough energy to excite electrons to the next energy level, so instead you induce molecular vibrations.
      Go up to a higher-energy radiation and you basically excite electrons right out of the atom! X-rays can absolutely knock electrons out of the valence shell, but in that case we don't see the fluorescence used in XRF. As you mentioned in your original comment, it would take a lot of energy to knock out electrons closest to the core...but X-rays have that much energy!
      I'll get around to doing my own XRF video some day...not quite ready to do that yet.

    • @rlrrlrll
      @rlrrlrll 3 года назад

      @@Double0pi Thank you for the explanations! I assumed Xrays are more powerful, but powerful enough to kick out electrons close to the core, that's pretty exciting :D

    • @Muonium1
      @Muonium1 Год назад

      @@Double0pi isn't there an error in this video? The narrator says the x-rays knock an election out of "a low energy level", but isn't it a HIGH energy level (hence the need for a photon of such high energy to eject it) and merely a LOW orbital number? Aren't the "outer" valence electrons actually in the lower energy levels?
      Also I'm afraid I cannot help but notice you are at the Evergreen State college....home to the most infamous incident on any college campus in the nation in the past several years. What is that like, especially being in the science department where there were organized efforts to "decolonize chemistry" and suchlike at the height of the insanity? Were you ever in contact with Bret or Heather?

  • @nisrinebedroune9325
    @nisrinebedroune9325 4 года назад

    Est ce que tu peut me aide moi

  • @davidcurtis7547
    @davidcurtis7547 Год назад

    Send me information please . I will visit the web site

  • @anasmoustafa7286
    @anasmoustafa7286 2 года назад

    great 3.5 mins

  • @philipchama8434
    @philipchama8434 11 месяцев назад

    Thank you

  • @alideep9656
    @alideep9656 5 лет назад

    Thanks