What i like about your reviews is that you always tend to use same subjects and scenarios, which helps me at finding differences across lenses :) it looks like viltrox is becoming the main b-class lenses manufacturer (cheap but still good) that we are all looking for. Awesome news, as i was almost sure lenses would cost a fortune on the new mirrorless nightmare!
Given the really strange distortion behavior, it feels like the focus warping could be the result of applying an incorrect distortion calibration profile.
Recently got my copy of the Viltrox 85mm 1.8 lens for my Z6ii after watching your review of the same. The lens works like a gem at the price. I think i am going for this wide angle. Thanks.
Samyang and Yongnuo are already makes RF lenses, so it’s only a matter of time that other third party manufacturers jump into making RF versions of their lenses.
@@AbdonPhirathon Wrong info. Read Abdons comment (they do. But they basically build ef lenses with a built in adapter if I'm not mistaken. And some manufacturers won't adapt their lenses unless they have the actual mount protocol)
@@maxmuenchow No, the lenses that Samyang and Yongnuo are making are redesigned mirrorless lenses. They both reversed-engineered the RF protocol, and they’re not even big players in the third party lens arena. If Sigma, Tamron and the others aren’t reverse-engineering the RF protocol is because they have other priorities, and not because they don’t have access to the RF protocol.
@@AbdonPhirathon okay seems like my information is outdated. Perhaps they just don't have production capacity for rf lenses. Man I'd want more lenses like my 85 1.4 samyang. That thing is bloody brilliant for the money
With these lenses, and any third party lenses, at least when it comes compared to the OEM Z lenses, things like distortion are probably going to be comrpomises. Of course with good RAW processing software (or something like Photoshop) you might be able to correct the pincushion distortion, but it is a little disappointing but the lens is about half of what the Nikon version is so there is some legit reasons to still get the Viltrox. It would be nice, though, if we could see side-by-side comparisons with the Z version (I know others, like Matt Granger) will sometimes do this, but I know each person's channel is different of course (not knocking you for this but it does give us a point of reference to work from, with visual examples). For example, I'm considering getting a 24mm 1.8 lens but woulid like to see some side-by-side comparisons between the options for Z (which as far as I know, in terms of AF, it's this and the Nikon Z lens).
I agree about the distortion compromise. I don't mind much,especially at that price. I always run everything through Lightroom so it's rather easy to deal with any distortion/vignetting issues.
Hey there Christopher, there is a Tamron lens that I have been looking at, the 35-150mm f/2.8-4. I was surprised to see that this is not a lens you have yet tested! After watching for so long, and having your reviews as comprehensive as they are, I have factored your recommendations in heavily before purchasing the set of glass that I currently own. I feel as though I cannot sign off on this purchase without your stamp of approval. This may be an exciting time to review this lens, because if the rumors are true, Tamron have in the works a brighter f/2-2.8 version of this lens. I wonder if it’s worth it to wait.
@@christopherfrost I may be stuck with the older version of this lens, with the new release exclusive to Sony E Mount, Im interested to see if they change the optical formula for the new version.
@@auddi_raynel It will be an enormous change in optical formula - not only is the aperture a whole stop brighter, but it'll be designed from the ground up for mirrorless :)
sorry,a noob questions here,can we open the "blade" manually?i always do it easily on my Nikkor N lenses with a small "toggle" at the back of the lens(when i want to check for a fungus),cant find a way to do it on viltrox lenses
Looks like a good lens it's exactly what I was looking for my Nikon z50. I was worried about the autofocus but seems to be fast and the fact that is silent is great news.
Viltrox makes a 23mm 1.4 for the Nikon Z mount so get that instead since that's made for APS-C and has the same optics. Plus it's faster and cheaper so overall it's a better buy for the Nikon Z50
@@CallMeRabbitzUSVI I know about the 23mm 1.4 but I don't think it's going to work properly on a full frame z mount Nikon. I will go full frame if Nikon releases something promising and I need a lens that I can work with.
@@konstantinos1555 δεν τους βλέπω να βγάζουν σύντομα κάποια νέα full frame (εάν εξαιρέσεις την z9 που θα κάνει 5-6κ) Τι σε κρατάει από το να πας σε μια z5 ή z6?
@@IliasKoureas η z5 δεν κάνει για βίντεο έχει 1.7 κροπ σε 4κ και δεν έχει τα 120fps σε 1080 αναλυση που έχει η z50. Η Ζ6 είναι καλή αλλά πάλι δεν διαφέρει πολύ από την Ζ50 4κ στα 30fps και 8bit βίντεο εσωτερικό χωρίς κάποια προσθήκη. Η Ζ9 είναι άπιαστη. Περιμένω κάτι ανάμεσα σε z6 και z9.
Hi. It was mentioned that this Viltrox 24mm has no Image Stabilization "Built-In". But the Nikon Z6, 6ii, 7, and 7ii ALL have IBIS, right? So it's not a concern if this Viltrox has no IS?
Give this Comment a thumbs up if you would like to see Chris test the Tokina SZX 400mm f/8 Reflex MF Lens for Sony E mount. It cost $249.00 . It is made with new technology, so it should outperform the older reflex mirror lens Chris tested sometime ago.
I do feel that mirror lens is getting neglected now, with a new coating, they perform very well. They actually do have a lot of potential, especially on mirrorless camera. I have that particular lens and it was great on my G85 + 0.71x Speedbooster. They are introducing a new lens soon, the 500mm f8 version of that. Put the mirror back on the camera :))))
What i like about your reviews is that you always tend to use same subjects and scenarios, which helps me at finding differences across lenses :)
it looks like viltrox is becoming the main b-class lenses manufacturer (cheap but still good) that we are all looking for. Awesome news, as i was almost sure lenses would cost a fortune on the new mirrorless nightmare!
I don't think I've ever noticed focus warping before. Honestly the warping is more distracting than normal breathing.
Given the really strange distortion behavior, it feels like the focus warping could be the result of applying an incorrect distortion calibration profile.
I love your reviews. Looking forward to seeing your reviews for new lenses in the future.
Recently got my copy of the Viltrox 85mm 1.8 lens for my Z6ii after watching your review of the same. The lens works like a gem at the price. I think i am going for this wide angle. Thanks.
3:11 Effects of diffraction?
Of vignetting... hmm contrast goes down at f/8 in that corner.
Oops, my mistake :)
Just came across your channel, and it's pure gold! Lovely reviews, easily understandable. Thank you!
I bought it specifically to pair with the Z fc for video and street. It is more than okay for the price point.
WOW! very good performance of this lens..👏🏼👏🏼
Can you tell me if the noise of the autofocus motor is heard in the audio recording in a quiet room?
Seems to be heavy with the chromatic abberation.Did you aslo try TTArtisan 21mm f1.5?Hope for this comparison.
I was so busy in the last month that I could not watch a single video from you. This feels like homecoming.
Amazing performance. I hope Viltrox will make it also for RF mount.
That's exactly what I was gonna write. Canon really should open up the Rf-system. Sadly I doubt that's gonna happen🥲
Samyang and Yongnuo are already makes RF lenses, so it’s only a matter of time that other third party manufacturers jump into making RF versions of their lenses.
@@AbdonPhirathon
Wrong info. Read Abdons comment
(they do. But they basically build ef lenses with a built in adapter if I'm not mistaken. And some manufacturers won't adapt their lenses unless they have the actual mount protocol)
@@maxmuenchow No, the lenses that Samyang and Yongnuo are making are redesigned mirrorless lenses. They both reversed-engineered the RF protocol, and they’re not even big players in the third party lens arena. If Sigma, Tamron and the others aren’t reverse-engineering the RF protocol is because they have other priorities, and not because they don’t have access to the RF protocol.
@@AbdonPhirathon okay seems like my information is outdated. Perhaps they just don't have production capacity for rf lenses. Man I'd want more lenses like my 85 1.4 samyang. That thing is bloody brilliant for the money
Let's wait to the Viltroz 35 Z and the Nikkor 40mm Z
I personally already pre-ordered the 40mm. I hear there will be supply issues and I was already considering a viltrox so it worked out.
I've got 35 and 85 to Z5 and i need to buy 24 too, very good lenses for that price.
With these lenses, and any third party lenses, at least when it comes compared to the OEM Z lenses, things like distortion are probably going to be comrpomises. Of course with good RAW processing software (or something like Photoshop) you might be able to correct the pincushion distortion, but it is a little disappointing but the lens is about half of what the Nikon version is so there is some legit reasons to still get the Viltrox.
It would be nice, though, if we could see side-by-side comparisons with the Z version (I know others, like Matt Granger) will sometimes do this, but I know each person's channel is different of course (not knocking you for this but it does give us a point of reference to work from, with visual examples). For example, I'm considering getting a 24mm 1.8 lens but woulid like to see some side-by-side comparisons between the options for Z (which as far as I know, in terms of AF, it's this and the Nikon Z lens).
I agree about the distortion compromise. I don't mind much,especially at that price. I always run everything through Lightroom so it's rather easy to deal with any distortion/vignetting issues.
Hey there Christopher, there is a Tamron lens that I have been looking at, the 35-150mm f/2.8-4. I was surprised to see that this is not a lens you have yet tested!
After watching for so long, and having your reviews as comprehensive as they are, I have factored your recommendations in heavily before purchasing the set of glass that I currently own. I feel as though I cannot sign off on this purchase without your stamp of approval.
This may be an exciting time to review this lens, because if the rumors are true, Tamron have in the works a brighter f/2-2.8 version of this lens. I wonder if it’s worth it to wait.
The f/2-2.8 version is coming so I'm going to wait for that :-)
@@christopherfrost I may be stuck with the older version of this lens, with the new release exclusive to Sony E Mount, Im interested to see if they change the optical formula for the new version.
@@auddi_raynel It will be an enormous change in optical formula - not only is the aperture a whole stop brighter, but it'll be designed from the ground up for mirrorless :)
Please test the Nikon 40 f2... Thanks for your work !!
Hi Chris, would this displace the nikkor z 1.8 on the 7 sharpest 24mm list? since you posted this video after that one
Please show also the improvement in the middle of the frame when stooping down .
I got the 56mm f/1.4 for my nikon z50. Love the performance till now.
Using an adapter?
@@steventhomas231 no..native on my zfc
@@steventhomas231 no, its native z mount.
I love the Viltrox❤️
sorry,a noob questions here,can we open the "blade" manually?i always do it easily on my Nikkor N lenses with a small "toggle" at the back of the lens(when i want to check for a fungus),cant find a way to do it on viltrox lenses
I always wait to hear you say softening due to diffraction when stopped down.
Yeah , felt weird when he doesn't says it 😂
"Due to the effects of Diffraction"
which one to get viltrox 13mm or the 24mm im a little bit confuse? thank you for the recommendation
I think you forgot to show center sharpness when stopped down.
Softness at f11 due to vignetting ? That doesnt make sense to me, I would say it is due to diffraction because of the big resolution of 45mpx
that almost uncorrectable distortion makes me wonder this might be a apsc lens to begin with
It’s sharp at extreme corner @F2.8, so I doubt it.
Seems like a solid alternative to the Z 24mm f/1.8 S seeing as I own the 35mm 1.8 S Nikon and don't need 24mm nearly as often.
Looks like a good lens it's exactly what I was looking for my Nikon z50. I was worried about the autofocus but seems to be fast and the fact that is silent is great news.
Viltrox makes a 23mm 1.4 for the Nikon Z mount so get that instead since that's made for APS-C and has the same optics. Plus it's faster and cheaper so overall it's a better buy for the Nikon Z50
@@CallMeRabbitzUSVI I know about the 23mm 1.4 but I don't think it's going to work properly on a full frame z mount Nikon. I will go full frame if Nikon releases something promising and I need a lens that I can work with.
@@konstantinos1555 gotcha, that makes sense if you are looking towards an upgrade path
@@konstantinos1555 δεν τους βλέπω να βγάζουν σύντομα κάποια νέα full frame (εάν εξαιρέσεις την z9 που θα κάνει 5-6κ)
Τι σε κρατάει από το να πας σε μια z5 ή z6?
@@IliasKoureas η z5 δεν κάνει για βίντεο έχει 1.7 κροπ σε 4κ και δεν έχει τα 120fps σε 1080 αναλυση που έχει η z50. Η Ζ6 είναι καλή αλλά πάλι δεν διαφέρει πολύ από την Ζ50 4κ στα 30fps και 8bit βίντεο εσωτερικό χωρίς κάποια προσθήκη. Η Ζ9 είναι άπιαστη. Περιμένω κάτι ανάμεσα σε z6 και z9.
Hi. It was mentioned that this Viltrox 24mm has no Image Stabilization "Built-In". But the Nikon Z6, 6ii, 7, and 7ii ALL have IBIS, right? So it's not a concern if this Viltrox has no IS?
That's correct.
Does it work with ronin s gimbal on focus wheel?
Better than the 24mm 1.8g?
Can you review the new 7artisans 50mm f0.95?
Well done sir.
Does this lens work on Nikon's Z50?
When it will come to r
It is a WIDE lens?
thanks a lot
Looks much more useful than the Sony version. Perhaps Viltrox can do a v2 for Sony?
hopefully but there are better 24mm’s on sony now around $400 you’d do better with the samyang
Give this Comment a thumbs up if you would like to see Chris test the Tokina SZX 400mm f/8 Reflex MF Lens for Sony E mount. It cost $249.00 . It is made with new technology, so it should outperform the older reflex mirror lens Chris tested sometime ago.
I do feel that mirror lens is getting neglected now, with a new coating, they perform very well. They actually do have a lot of potential, especially on mirrorless camera. I have that particular lens and it was great on my G85 + 0.71x Speedbooster. They are introducing a new lens soon, the 500mm f8 version of that.
Put the mirror back on the camera :))))
It's didn't not support for slow-motion
"Softness from the effects of vignetting" - are you alright?