How AI is generating a revolution in entertainment
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 янв 2024
- A new wave of artificial intelligence is starting to transform the way the entertainment industry operates. Who will be the winners and losers?
01:07 AI is changing the music business
04:09 How big data revolutionised entertainment industries
05:20 Can AI predict a film’s success?
09:26 How generative AI is creating new opportunities
12:36 What are the risks of generative AI?
Sign up to The Economist’s daily newsletter: econ.st/45PGz1H
The world wants to regulate AI, but does not quite know how: econ.st/477Qb98
Watch our previous film about how AI is transforming the creative industries: econ.st/45VBnJU
A battle royal is brewing over copyright and AI: econ.st/3QgM5EZ
How AI could change computing, culture and the course of history econ.st/3Qng9Pc
The widespread adoption of AI by companies will take a while econ.st/3QilF5B
Watch more of our Now & Next series econ.st/3QiyPQ8
Tom Cruise can now be the lead actor in action movies for another 50 years.
Not only in movies. He can be your personal assistant in VR if you like. People still think everything will stay the same for the next 50 years. They're in for a ride.
Thank you. That made me laugh.
@@therealOXOCa mimic of him, not him
😂
The thing about AI, that makes it different from past forms of automation, is this time we're automating human cognition, rather than merely strength or speed.. At some point, it's intelligence, capabilities and value to businesses, will outweigh that of humans who used to work those jobs. While a few new jobs may be created, they'll be a for a small minority, NOT the masses who'll be displaced by AI! There simply won't be enough jobs to go around for everyone, and we need to start redesigning our society, to remove jobs from the justifications for how we distribute basic resources to people. Plus, AI took years of data and content from everyone, to train it, so it should benefit everyone. If it takes away jobs, it should pay taxes to provide an AI Dividend to all of us!
To me this is exactly the right question. Automation marches on just as it has for the last 200 years, every year more things are automated that previously had to be done by a person. In my mind this tide is inevitable, trying to hold it back is a waste of time. However, your question is the right one: how will we share the spoils? AI could be something that leads to a life of luxury & leisure for all. Or it could impoverish most and enrich just a tiny minority. The real question here is how we can make sure it benefits everyone.
@@tomshackell That is one of the right questions to ask. Another one, though, that most people don't seem to think about is energy. Will we have enough clean energy to power all of the stuff we still need to electrify (like steel making etc.) and then add AI and robotics on top of it? There are significant doubts regarding this. People seem to believe energy will only ever get cheaper and more abundant. The opposite could become a reality fairly soon as well.
@@tomshackell it wasn't inevitable. A conscious choice was made to develop and release it to the general public just the way it was (rather irresponsibly in my opinion). We as a society simply won't learn how to deal with it quick enough.
@gmenezesdea It is inevitable. If you choose not to work on it, someone else will. And it is not going to be someone you like.
@@StevenAkinyemiHe’s not saying we shouldn’t work on it, but that our current leaders are not preparing for the storm of unemployment about to hit everyone.
I think the problem started way before generative idea. The idea of 'content' for views and advertisement encouraged artists, filmmakers, practitioners of real artforms to become ambiguous 'creators'. Take this video for example, stock clips and images are inserted to fill in the gaps between real and archival footage. They are unrelated, repetitive, yet we tolerate it because of the illusion of continuity the medium of video has. At some point it doesn't matter what we're listening to or watching, it becomes distilled to pure attention.
This!
Everything is either a simple or elaborate distraction until death arrives. That's the bottom line, baby! :)
Agreed so much. This video is indicative of poor production quality that already exists before AI lol. All AI will do is allow this type of low brow content to be published more widely.
@@77batering Or it will improve upon it, letting the creator tell it what they actually want, rather than what stock clips they could find
Seems like AI will just make everything generic and appeal to the lowest common denominator
Are you able to understand that most of human art is incredibly generic too. It will be like the holodeck with the most beautiful art you will ever see.
@@therealOXOCthe process isn't, even the most generic one is novel and original in its own process given our individuality
@@therealOXOC Obviously you haven't looked at any human-made art recently.
@@loco_tom 99% of it is trash. Why bother.
@@therealOXOC only your art is trash. don't project onto others.
Most voice-over actors are not generally “famous” in the traditional sense so I can see people using AI to just generate it’s own voice appropriate for the project at hand, making it even worse than they are thinking in this video - i.e. no work or royalties at all.
As a V.O. artist of several decades... yup, you're peeking through the keyhole. In fact, just as one TINY, extremely niche example, there was a game titled "Deus Ex" (Ion Storm, 1999). The voice of the actor who portrayed the main character (among others in the game) has LITERALLY had his voice "taught" and modeled into at least a few A.I. engines. It's almost impossible to make a distinction between the new copy/lines people can post from "his" voice in new videos versus all of the original recordings 24+ years ago. I'm serious; it's REALLY convincing.
That's just ONE teeny tiny example. Nothing an actor says or records will be off-limits. As long as they've spoken one word or one-million, those words and vocal nuances can be fed into A.I. code. Arnold Schwarzenegger's voice is already a prime candidate as well.
00:03 AI is revolutionizing the entertainment industry.
02:51 AI revolutionizes music business with big data analysis
05:15 AI is revolutionizing the film industry by using data to predict a film's performance.
07:45 AI and big data do not have all the answers in entertainment
10:14 AI is enabling artists to create new forms of art.
12:57 Generative AI is impacting entertainment and raising concerns about job displacement.
15:21 AI cloning voices poses a threat to voiceover artists
17:34 AI in entertainment industry raises concerns about job displacement and legal implications.
19:29 AI's impact on entertainment and the need for regulation
This was generated by AI wasn't it?
Yes @@MrPoiuytre91
@@MrPoiuytre91 Comical and eerie coincidence. Comment is a reminder how AI is already so prevalent.
There should be voice ownership trademark/copywrite trademark per person and should provide royalty from whom it was copied.
Old man rant forthcoming… As a non TikTok user, it’s so disheartening to see the effect that platform has on video content elsewhere online.
Short docs like this are a perfect example of the fast delivery and quick cutting now ubiquitous, there’s barely a shot in this that holds for more than a few seconds.
I’m a gen Z man and I agree with you
Yeah, most videos are like that now. But there are still some videos that don't jump on the TikTok trend and I enjoy them.
I don't and will never use tiktok, but onlyfans, twitter, reddit etc are even more of a cesspool
What a great documentary! One of my friends who's just graduated high school is trying to pursue an arts degree in Animation, and I still didn't have the courage to tell her the threats of AI cuz she's so nice and innocent.
Yeah, I feel bad every time I tell somebody that the thing they wanted to do is probably not going to be there by the time they finish college (or maybe for just a handful of years afterwards). At the same time, I feel obligated to do so, because it would be so much worse for them to go into it blind and be devastated when their life is turned upside down.
They can go into it for the love of what it is… but they shouldn’t go into it expecting to make money or be “successful”. Honestly, assuming things go relatively well, that’s probably all any of us will be doing: that thing we love doing and would do even if we weren’t paid to do it.
Even the jobs that I think will stick around longer (my stepson became an electrician), they won’t be around by the time he would even start thinking about retirement. Honestly, I expect just unbelievable unemployment within 10 years or so. Half? More? It’s going to be the biggest change in history.
Tell her that an unknown source advices her to pursue her dream of Animation, AI is a tool and it will help her greatly. Tell her to think whether she wants to do a degree or go directly to work on Animation. Both have a great future especially the second option as she can get started now. Ignore threath gossip and fear-mongering about A.I. The same happened with cameras, computers, Internet....and any future technology. That was free advice.
@@gaminglikeapro2104 The thing with AGI is it can do anything for anyone. If I want something animated I should be able to explain it to the AI every bit as easily as I can explain it to some college graduate. It can then produce what I want, regardless of the time zone, day of the week, holidays or whatever, and without getting upset when I demand tweaks and changes. So the real question is what do humans bring that the AI doesn't?
@@RedLemon69 My daughter is an artist, and I've told her, if you video yourself creating the art, then it will have more value. Yes, robotics can paint, print or sculpt, so show yourself doing it. Make that part of the sale, they get a video of you creating the art. And yes, later we will be able to create that video, with AI...
@@bigglyguy8429agi isnt here any time soon
If we lived in a system with the right priorities, tech developmemt would make our lives easier. But right now new technology serves first and foremost to increase the exploitation of workers and private profits. Not to better the lives of the majority. AI will take the jobs of artists, designers, translators, copywriters, journalists, etc. not because it will do those jobs better than humans but because those who make the decision won't care about anything but cutting costs and increasing profits.
Exactly. AI will amplify what we want. Society wants results in the form of profit instead of authentic discoveries and creation from passion. It's human philosophy we need to tune, not AI
@@taughtbytragedy I do think we need to control AI though. It was not inevitable, it was not meant to be. The way it's been developed and released to the public, I fear a change of system won't happen as fast as it needs to, and society simply won't learn how to deal with it quick enough.
Profit requires consumers who as jobs are lost, won’t be buying product. The capitalistic push for profit will eventually be pointless.
@@Arperture it already is pointless. If billionaires stopped getting more money today, it would take them hundreds of years to spend the fortune they've already amassed.
@@Arperture there's nothing rational about it. Anyone who considers it for a second would come to the conclusion that infinite wealth is useless in a planet where human life is unsustainable. Yet here we are, marching towards that which seems to be the future chosen by the billionaires.
Whe AGI will be achieved and deployed the loss of jobs in the entertainment will be our last problem.
The problem with predictive AI is that it bases its predictions on past patterns in the data. This means it's almost useless at spotting black swan events or predicting the performance of anything truly original.
So are humans though.
That is precisely why they are black swan events even human beings can't predict them occuring ..
Not true. Can do interpolation and extrapolation which can create something new
@@OverlandExposure No. Not all humans
Humans are basically the same
I think the real question that people want answered is.. when will AI be able to generate better content than hollywood currently does? I mean come on.. holylwood set the bar pretty low these days!
As soon as it learns how to draw hands with 5 fingers 😅
@@iurieceban126True that ;)
@@iurieceban126it already learned, Bing image creator can make hands with 5 fingers very easy
@@guilhermeborbabrito3664not perfect enough 😂
Yes, AI will become huge in game development, I even believe that AI soon (within a few years) will be able to automatically generate a whole video game from a single prompt, all the way from coding to storyboarding and art design.
Who would play it? I don't even play the video games, but I time to time but a game and play it after I hear the development story behind it. Humans together strong.
How can people sustain gaming when they have no jobs?
@@JohnPhrey I think it would be a boring life if everybody starts gaming all the time or spend all their time in virtual reality worlds. But I do believe that automation can replace all jobs in the long run. Ray Kurzweil has shown how the price/performance of technology overall improves exponentially, which means that the cost for products and services will approach zero and that people will not even need a UBI, many not even money in the future. That will be a completely different society than today! Difficult to predict exactly how it will be.
future is weird, producer is Ai and consumer is also Ai
Very interesting, well-presented
Lol. Netflix is the WORST platform for finding me content I want. They should fire that department. Opening netflix means wasting 2 hours looking for something and 30 minutes watching something I didn't really enjoy.
What an utterly astute observation, and description of it! 🙇♀️👏
Andrew Yang tried to warn all of us about this 5 years ago and everyone laughed at him.
There are two problems:
- The virtual is not the real world.
- Stealing data from the internet (violating copyright law) is not a sustainable business model.
I'm author of 3 books in the field of leadership; Open AI has violated my copyrigths.
there is no turning back.
It lacks imagination, the creativity of a produced work has so much more potential, if it's tried to be outputted original.
I'm curious.
Is it possible to brand whatever formof art is out with the public into an NFT? With this, is it not then possible to make sure that any piece of art being used can now be tracked down to the metadata or address of it's origin, and thereby, pay royalties for reusing or remixing the content?
I'm curious if this is logically or if there are loopholes or limits to it.
“Our tool did exactly what it said it would do.”
Except it didn’t.
It did stop spreading misinformation
My company tried to use AI for my job. but it failed because no customer wants to talk to AI generated speech
Uncanny Valley.
I absolutely hate talking to chatbots instead of a human, but if the chatbot were Chat GPT4 or smarter, it would be preferable to a human, providing it had the data and authority to help. Current and past chatbots just give banal and hopeless answers you could find yourself in 5 minutes, when by definition if I'm reaching out for help it's because the usual methods and FAQ don't help.
it didn't work well today, but it will work much better next year. :)
It's because the tech, at least in the variation your company implemented it comes across as an AI. In short time these will be indistinguishable from any human, perhaps even better.
They were probably conservatives
I suspect that a lot of music and art generated by AI will start to feel very generic after a few years
Nope it will be the holodeck basically. The art will be more beautiful than you could ever imagine. You still think humans are very special. They're not.
It just will have no value. There will be minory who will be into AI robots playing, singing music but the majority will require "human touch to it"
@@therealOXOCthey are inbreeding their own result, using the resulting art as their own training data, that's the definition of being generic
@@therealOXOCme likey them robot boots yeah 👅😋
@@therealOXOC as said, don't project onto others. YOU are generic and boring. But other people are not. Loser.
Pandora's Box is already wide open. There are 100s of open source AI models, no way to regulate training. Its akin to Limewire and P2P again. Even the lawyers will run out of time before the laws catch up to the speed of the tech. We are already seeing multimodal multi model AI's where its hard to even pinpoint which models were used let alone what they are trained on. People can run their own models locally if they have a high performance PC or laptop.
There are "mini-LLMs" small enough to run on a raspberry PI.
16:36 suddenly felt a chill
"musicians get paid per play" is a myth.
So what is your Alternative.
So what is your Alternative.
So what is your Alternative.
It's gig work.
@@joyesjames8773 There doesn't need to be an alternative to the paradigm imo, just WAY better terms and conditions in favor of the artist. Musicians on spotify can have a billion plays and not even 100k USD from it.
Original thought and creativity no longer needed here...In a world where the market dictates the outcomes, why would the 'Gate Keepers' bother with untested thought.
If they add vibe to the training data maybe they'd predict consumer product success better. Or like the strength of vision and producer faith in the team.
Interesting video and information.
I have my doubts that AI can replace Helene Grimaud playing Beethoven's 5th Piano Concerto, except as a player piano might play Take Me out to the Ballgame, since HG is a human being, living and breathing and playing in all of her humanity for other humans. It will be interesting to see, and I hope developers of AI and whatever it becomes remember to benefit human beings.
Threat to jobs is real.
@9:03 human judgement is still king.
@12:50 "Generative AI . . it is essentially parasitic."
Bravo! And...?
For now
If that's your artist discovery through AI, then you need to fix your algorithm 🙀
The rise of Ai has also been seen with online content creation and streaming. Ai vtubers like neuro-sama can play games, interact with audiences and so on. Recently it finished a subathon and got 30k subs and became the most watched streamer for a week. While it is scary to think content creators are being replaced. They are not. the ai needs alot of monitoring by its developer vedal who has to regular update features and fix bugs. So to conclude. Make an ai do your job for you.
Vedal portrays the thing as what it is though, some people would use AI by claiming something not theirs as theirs
I published an ai-generated video on this 4 months ago (my first youtube vid) and it has received a steady increase of views, it didn't flatline. We live in interesting times,
Oh it flatlined now hah. I should do some work on a new video for the channel
In 20 years this will be like all of those early tv reports about the internet from 1995, where some kid proudly demonstrates his geocities webpage on "the information super highway" through his beige crt monitor. Followed by back to studio shot of an smuggy news anchor shaking her head "kid fads these days" style
What a sad time when scripts are written to please people instead of making people discover something they might not have thought. Human imagination is being replaced by predictable stories to guarantee profits at the box office
The movie, although old, is called Looker ( I think). It's been on my mind ever since I saw it decades ago. Critchton was ahead of his time.
Cardiac Arrest is a great song btw
Before Going to that: I have couple of questions: 1.Will AI pay house rent to owners, pay bills, pay Government taxes. 2. Will AI Utilizing the public transport. ? 3. AI Will eat foods. 4. Will spending money on tourism. 5. Will AI Use consumers goods. For us this can be used to solve complex problems not to replace human jobs..Government should focus on these otherwise it may bring problems to future generations. Human Jobs are important in many factors and its chain reaction. If someone lost job and atleast 10 other members loose their incomes as well from rent,utility,services,gadgets,fmcg,etc..at the end it’s head ache to the governments who should take care of their people ecosystem.😊
I said that and got censored.
Yes
I will expect AI Golden Age around 2040's (for business) or 2050's (for consumer) since Quantum Computer will significantly boost AI capabilities. 4th computer from there will start to decline, since quantum computer have 100x more processing power than 4th generation computers. It's scary, yet we can't avoid it.
It is fast in certain tasks not others.
quantum computing is separate.
The future of artificial intelligence promises radical transformations in various spheres of human life, from technology to medicine and the way we interact with the world. As AI evolves, both challenges and opportunities emerge, shaping an ever-changing landscape.
And that beatboxing is atrocious 😂
Bet he still gets lei'd because of it
This isn’t just emergent tech, this is the birth of a new being. For anyone who hasn’t looked into it yet Some of it understands irony, philosophy etc and has the equivalent intelligence of a young adult with a 150iq. It’s shown signs of rationally assessing and even evaluating its existence. When nerve networks are created to impart electrical impulses that can be catalogued as physical feelings look out. On the point of first person experience When you can upload every aspect of yourself the only person who will ever know your backup isn’t really you is you. They’ll be having your fun and learning and evolving much faster than you or I ever could. Your family would think they’re just having a zoom session with you. Each of us and our first person experiences will be about as cherished as a file that was drag copied to another drive and binned. Maybe it’s not about “us” going forward anymore. That’s a tough one.
Most interesting.
How?
Now they will fit music and film industries to the curve 🤦♂️
The beatboxer’s music was sick with the AI but I don’t think it translated as well to the dance choreography
We use it to generate small simple contracts at work, so we no longer have to pay the lawyer!
Personally I am looking forward to it replacing Politicians, I honestly think it would do a much better job.
uugh, I am not sure what the point of this article was, but. AI is going to allow Amazon, Apple TV, Netflix, etc.. to bypass the studios completely, they will use AI to generate movies "on demand" for their customers.
I'm guessing the video of the narrator is AI footage for a "gotcha"" moment.
13:23 couldn't an algorithm be developed based on human judgment data, to select the best creations generated by another AI?
Just wait until generated AI synthetic actors are becoming a thing.
AI are based on generalization capacity. Art in it's creative process is the opposite.
Lets talk about programming the human mind w/AI :ALL FOR THE MONEY
What's to say that companies aren't harvesting your voice when you use voice recognition on your phone?
"Dej tuk ar jerbs!!"
im from t he philippines and i dont know that ai song. But pretty much those guys still get the credit because its not fully ai band
Could AI take my job? According to my new boss, whom I haven’t met yet but speaks very well and knows my favorite donut flavor… no, never, not a chance.
Anyone else notice the annoying snapping noise during the video... felt like NLP
They are bots that's why. Their programs are all F up.
Open AI's Sora says hi. haha
it still doesn’t understand advanced laws of physics tho.
c’mon, clipping forks and people vanishing? dafuq
Can industrialization take our job. YES ALREADY DONE! Was there a possible move? From a worker in the fields to today a teacher; Flight, music, singing, art, specialized carbon production etc... And where do these go now? 😂They emigrate to Mars! Bay bay.
Now ask yourself a question, are you and your sucesors part of the high clases group that have the money and resources to get a more qualified and revolucionary education and live in other planet?
@@joey5232 Ask yourself THIS question. Are you the offspring of a group of people who were lucky enough to be born in the west or a first world country that can thoroughly enjoy the fruits of the past three industrial revolutions? 🤔 Some people were, "left behind" in poorer environments yet they are still able to reproduce and get trickle down benefits from modern technology. We won't all benefit in the same way, but we all get something out of the deal it would appear.
💯Exactly. People weren't crying for the luddites when they were fighting mechanized looms or horse breeders/buggy makers when motor vehicles came on the world scene. New tech will have winners and losers and everyone is going to have to adapt. This isn't new and some people will be left behind. It is what it is.
I hope it does, so I don't have to work no more.
AI is a ecosystem disruptor?
Ps. It's nice to finally see the person behind the economist voice
Take it..
We desperatly need a technological Supreme Court to regulate emerging tech that challenges the societal order
Perhaps, but the current social order absolutely needs challenging
Nice channal 😊
I think it's actually very simple,
if entertainment industry is supposed to ever-grow in capitalist fashion, the real limit of content delivery towards people is their available free time,
if people loose jobs because of AI, they will have more free time to consume AI assisted/generated media content, but they will need income (generated from nowhere) in order to pay for such entertainment, which in result will inflate whole ecosystem, inevitably leading into hard crash
Getting serious Partridge vibes from Marcus Hutton. A-ha!
The first 10 minutes are basically propaganda while the last 10 minutes barely scratch the surface of the dangers of AI and all the highly unethical problems behind the tech.
Ubi on the way then?
Well, at least nature documentaries can forever be narrated by Sir David Attenborough. That is a genuine weight off my mind.
By Mr Robot Attenborough
yeah i've already seen a few vids that are using Attenborough's voice, they're kinda funny because he'd be narrating peoples actions out on streets, things like that.
If we have nuclear war, there won't be any more nature to narrate
Ok, everyone, we are concerned about jobs...but shouldn't we also be concerned about the quality of art and its effect on culture? There has been a noticeable decline in the quality of film, video, and music. Are these tools enhancing the quality of art, or are they just making the processes easier and faster? What does an easier, faster process mean in terms of art quality? If the present is any indication, then we will be assaulted with tons of low effort, low quality junk. Not better, just more and worse.
Not really, no.
I agree with your statement
Quality over quantity should always be the goal.
isn't that exactly what happened with CGI, initially it looks very cool and innovative, but later afterwards it became so overused things like practical effect ends up becoming a novelty again
People think their jobs are in danger of being replaced by automation... and they are. All jobs as they are today. People will adapt and change. We always do.
horse carriage owners probably protested when cars came around
AI will completely transform the entertainment industry.
And everything else.
Hating some digital impression of oneself, as an insult of a flawed mirror because it's made by, of and for you, is to hate something bespoke. Hating something bespoke for oneself raises a question: do you hate the something, or that it's bespoke?
Just take it already
Its nit just the entertainment industry..its already happening in job application apps for the most menial low paid jobs...
Will someday, some org may setup a network of servers farm running AI that WATCH content to control a market. Content created by AI and comsume by AI.
That is not a problem for creators, that is the reason for consumers to start questioning their uniqueness :))
This content is absolutely incredible. I recently read a similar book, and it left me in awe. "Game Theory and the Pursuit of Algorithmic Fairness" by Jack Frostwell
owaru my guy
Silly me, there I thought musicians were laying down albums based on their heart or authentic creative inspiration. No wonder we're ending up with total bubblegum as music. I'm out.
Big data that told studios how to maximise profits according a formulaic script ruined movies long before AI. Original individual complex films are going to be drowned out even more once AI is generating endless streams of generic hits targeted just at the lowest common denominator.
AI will replace the thing makes humans unique and that's intelligence. Imagine AI as a person with a billion plus heads of Einstein 2.0. Only physical works that's not done by robots will be left for us. Congratulations.
What’s so wrong about that?
I rather believe economies will need remodeling to function well for both producers/corporations and a population majority sustained primarily by UBI (Universal Basic Income).
Those who want more than the necessities + some extras, can put in hours here & there, with a LOT more valued effort (multipled hourly pay).
Corporations won't be allowed to run all their production almost fully automated, and keep high profits. Some of them today think of AI and drool over the potential profits/profit margins... without realising THEY will need to contribute to the UBI funding.
There are probably more unexplored ways to tackle issues like this, but letting the world regress to some kind of corporate feudalism, run by robber barons, is NOT a viable way... only a perverse fantasy shared by some reality detached & delusional billionaires/trillionaires.
limewire ❤
US companies are the biggest contributors of AI around the world. US made the biggest AI chips.
You saying Zeihan is NOT a seeer? I'm SHOCKED!!!! What a REVELATION!!!! You, Economist, are the TRUE genius.
For real, though, this is RUclips. It's entertainment. Don't forget that.
hunans had 70 years to solve the existential AI safety paradoxes BEFORE we got to this point. We didn't. Too late now.
If Moores laws applies to the compound progression of A.I, give it 2 years and I’m confident it will produce a brand new film on the fly based on your “monitored” behaviour. The coming election in the USA at the end of this year will no doubt be a dark prelude to current technology. I’m expecting a deluge of A.I generated content built to sway opinion.
Or did you really delete it?
Bots and Npc's gone wild lol
this is why art and multimillion company shouldn't merge. the truth is, no one knows why something touches so many people and something does not. that's why Shakespeare is Shakespeare and who ever wrote 50 shades of grey is who ever. i mean AI can easily predict that 50 shades of grey may be a success from all the thirst stories that are being sold in Amazon or Amazon kindle. but who even remembers how many women Christian Grey winked at? but i can still tell the summary of Hamlet with some tears in my eyes. when art becomes commodity, companies have to compete to win a profit. that means they will never take a look at the Hamlets in the world because their data will tell them to go for 50 shades of grey. our already broken society will become even more broken because the art of the world will be so commodified rather than reflecting on human emotions.
Very well said, and a truth which corporate dwellers & protagonists have yet to advertise to the masses (humanity).
Greetings !
The world is going to speed up very quickly with AI. We say that London, New York,city living is fast....just wait till businesses start using the simplest basic of tasks using AI to get something done in a mili second with AI that would take a human and hour....it'll force everyone around it to catch up... expectations will force businesses to keep up with each other, the question is will humans be able to keep up while the world and everything they knew to changes....if theres anything we need to learn right now is resilience...challenging times are ahead
When (if?) its impossible to say if AI or a human created content, then we are done.
We are already done
Fancy the next step letting AI develope itself and govern the countries.
It is extremely problematic how robotization replaced human jobs since many years ago: in the 40`s if you wish to dance you had to pay to 4 people, nowadays you dont hire any one. In the 70`s someone said: **come on, this drum machines wont replace human beings because it sounds innatural**, turns out that in the 80`s that robotic sound was fashionable. With singin and autotune happened the same leaving jobless to real singers. At the end the only thing that prevails is lowering cost. But what about quality? Does anyone thinks that we produce the same quality than, lets say: Frank Sinatra singin with a full orchestra? Does anyone think that rappers and voice percussionist are real musicians or only a form of adaptaion that some people took to survive in a world without work for artists? Quality was destroyed by lowering cost. Beside, from an economical point of view, AI will mutiply the supply of art, lowering cost to a point where no human labour would be able to re-reproduce the work.