Or, the closest convenient store is at the corner down the street. The fact that the robot did not even ask what he wants to eat and just assumed the apple because that is the object it was told to pick. This looked so scripted. The funny thing is that the human talks more like a robot than the robot does ^_^;;;
But that is the chance to make a bundle pack of other add-on features to give it basic functionality. Then a steady avalanche of profit for the company through sub's, haha
@@brenjI could see that or instead of a “subscription” depending on said “service” or “action” it’s more like downloadable apps. Let’s be honest; their is going to be a “new” robot from different companies(once it’s affordable to the public or mass produced for companies- but the real profit comes once it’s services can be used by the common people for everyday use) saying “new upgrade”- “better tech” so on and so fourth. Kinda how Apple pushes a new iPhone every year because of some minute(tiny) change in either gear/tech to encourage you to buy it. This just leads to it being more price friendly for the consumer to be open minded on the price of said robot rather than now “I have to pay 4 digits on the robot itself and yet still pay (X) amount of dollars on a subscription that may or may not come with every mechanic you want or be at such a price range where you’d want one mechanic/action yet forced to be up charged to pay for the ones you don’t because it’s a “packaged deal”. No matter how you look at it; being able to fully buy something and own it compared to a subscription fund will always be a lot cheaper over the long run. Even though “micro transactions” will be at a cost on things that you’d assume should just come with the robot yet have to pay for.(Within reasoning theory I pray their isn’t an app that allows the use of limbs once you buy the robot.) But the whole purpose; I believe is the better option just so you’re able to transfer presets, and mechanics/actions to the “better” robots that comes out. With all honesty if the Apple vision pro was not 3500~ roughly to just purchase and yet at a price point most Apple users could afford like 1500~ that headset would have been main stream or an everyday eye-wear you would have seen a lot more people wearing/using. Despite the makings of theses AI Robots being marketed to cut down on company cost first(which why I think most of the showcases were them doing similar actions related to a job/ manual labor) we will not get consumer production for a long time.
@@zam023 How dense are you? Or have you not actually watched that whole video? It chose the apple because it was the only edible object in front of it.
It's funny but dystopian to think of a rescue robot just standing there, buffering away for 10 seconds while you're dying on the ground. All because you wanted the cheaper internet package from Xfinity :')
People aren't leaving the workforce, the workforce is forcing people out. Steadily applying for jobs and not even getting calla back for things I'm well qualified for. And the fact that he launched a job board company then transitioned to robots to replace workers is a connection that my conspiratorial brain is clinging to.
These robots will be a flop just because something that is built for everything is a lot more expensive than a robot built for something specific, there will always be a need for people just not as factory cogs.
The robot waiting for 10 seconds in response to emergency sounds like something that can be easily solved by installing local emergency response software that allows instant reactions on certain situations, like contacting 911 and performing basic emergency procedures, while it is waiting for the server to respond.
That would require a lot of aditional computing capacity and Figure takes more like 3-4 sec. to respond. Also: Even if it's 10, it won't make a difference. If your life depends on 10 seconds you are not going to make it.
Ten seconds isn’t all that long. If your health emergency is so severe that you cannot survive for ten seconds without receiving medical intervention, you were almost certainly going to die anyway. I’m a regular senior safety marshal for the notoriously dangerous, Isle of Man TT motorcycle races. We have helicopter doctors on call in case of a serious incident and they usually arrive on scene within 5 mins of any emergency call and it’s up to us marshals to give immediate first aid until the Airmed Doctor arrives, but even then, we are specifically trained, in the event of a rider crashing in front of us, to stop and count to ten, before doing anything. (except for waving yellow flags and pressing the emergency button on the TETRA radio) The reason for this ten second delay is mainly because witnessing the sheer violence of a high speed motorcycle crash can be very shocking and the instinct to do something immediately can lead to people forgetting their situational awareness and doing silly things like running out into the track to help a fallen rider without checking to see that the yellow flags are out and that following riders have seen them and are slowing down. This short delay is highly unlikely to make any difference to the ultimate medical outcome of a fallen/injured rider, but it can definitely make the difference between acting rationally in a safe and controlled manner, and running about like a headless chicken, possibly making a bad situation even worse.
The problem is that this new generation won't accept barely survival as a wage. I suppose me and my other boomer friends will have to clean our toilets ourselves.
Also pretty certain their is no _global_ labor shortage at all, their might be a housing crisis though, because of how capital messed up pricing of those.
Having worked in a factory I can guarantee you that those jobs do pay well and it is sad how lazy most of the employees are. I’d automate too. The average gen Z American like myself are too entitled to ever take over for our parents generation of hardworking people.
There is a labor shortage yet unemployment is very low. There isn't a labor shortage because americans do not want to work. There is a labor shortage because the actual population that is a part of the labor pool is shrinking while the number of older retirees is increasing. This is excaberated by the need for the greedy corporations to have continued profits while doing nothing to invest in the actual labor pool by paying for the education and training necessary to fill their needs. The modern worker is expected to take on massive debt to train and educate themselves in order to fill these roles, and many are choosing not to because it is not in their best interest. To me, the labor shortage means a lot of things. Its means our private sector has over expanded without a sufficient labor pool to handle that expansion AND the job creators could mitigate the problem by actually funding cheaper education and training, and paying adequate wages when workers get that training. but they will never do that because MUH PROFITS. They'll just make robots instead because they are cheaper than us.
😧 "unlike humans, robots don't need to take a break, sleep, go on holidays, strike .." or disobey orders, which is very very troubling when these are inevitably used as soldiers
Anecdote: while working as a manager in *big company* warehouse, my dad knew a few forklift drivers. One time they implemented some automatic forklifts, to deal with moving some parts. In the act of protest, forklift drivers would cover the robot’s sensors with duct tape, so they became confuse and couldn’t do their job. Other thing - they would drop heavy packages/some liquid spill on the route of the robots, so humans could still operate (because it was just a small obsticle to avoid) but robots would stop and needed help. The management needed to call a meeting and assure this people that automatic forklifts were here only to help with some of the harder tasks, and no one is going to lose their jobs. I don’t know how it went, but we need to keep in mind that the workers will do things like that.
Isn't this the same type of activity that has occurred through history when jobs are threatened by automation? IIRC, it never stops investors from making the shift to said technology.
@@danielclawson2099 well, this time might be a little different. If everything is automated, then there are no jobs. If there is no jobs, then there’s no nobody to buy these ridiculous products. How would the businesses make money then?
@@hashtagunderscore3173 I said nothing about the potential impact, just pointing out that worker protests don't seem to keep businesses from cutting headcount afforded by new efficiencies, in order to realize savings. I'm not sure that legislation would preserve jobs and lifestyles: an investor could just move their facilities somewhere said protections don't exist.
@@danielclawson2099 fair enough. While I agree that in the specific instance of technological advancement, worker protests and strikes don’t seem to make much of a difference, or rather they don’t mitigate or retard these effects; however , as a general rule, worker uprising and strikes have made significant changes in the past.
@@hashtagunderscore3173 Worker organizations - including unions - were critical to improving worker conditions and compensation through the early 20th century. Now, today's large employers (ex: Amazon) work very hard to undermine unions. Large white collar employers (FAANG) use collision and non-compete clauses to depress wages for high skill tech workers. And, the spectre of outsourcing hangs over all. It seems to me that US worker leverage, vs. employers, has been falling since the 70's.
you just answered the question yourself, don't do things that are so easy a machine or the guy next door can do, thats a universal truth, unrelated to the current situation.
@@rjohnm666 Not necessarily. Once we get space mining and space habitats going. And humanoid robots will accelerate that immensely. Then our industrial, agricultural and resourese extraction capabilities will outstrip demand by so much that it'll be basically be post scarcity.
@vi6ddarkking they are asteroids within reach that have more value than our whole planets gpd. I think we are closer than we realize that's if we don't nuke ourselves first
Humanoid battle bot's. Kung Fu? Or accessories and weapons. Or both, each a test of the physical and software robustness. We just don't teach them how to use firearms 🤣
"unlike humans, robots don't need to take a break, sleep, go on holidays, strike .." or disobey orders, which is very very troubling when these are inevitably used as soldiers
I say they will be subject to rights to repair once you buy your own robots it's my robot, I know this will end up being a political issue like issues before with John Deere, Apple devices and Europe forcing apple tree make a universal one product charging cable it's going to get political 🤔🧐
@@Sashazur totally agree.... I imagine when new models can be run on local devices vs central servers, latency will be improved by order(s) of magnitude. Exiting times ahead from the tech point of view!
This is all the slowest they can be able to be😂 . 2024 is the last year we will make fun to be faster than them. After 8 months, from now on to the future, the slow thing gonna be us.
I live in a [certain part] of the UK. My neighbour told me her wife was feeling unwell, but they decided NOT to go to the emergency room. Because there was a wait. For the ambulance. Of EIGHTEEN HOURS. Sooooo....yeah...
Conveniently brushes over the quote regarding that attrition rates are still high. The thing is corporations don't want to solve that by paying a fair wage. What corporations want are slaves. Thats basically what a robot becomes. The other issue that isn't addressed is that in a free labour market, its impossible to be priced competitively with slaves, so there will be a further erosion of wages.
By providing a fair wage as you say, companies have to price their product out of business. People are not going to pay $20 for a McDonald's hamburger because of high wage costs. Enter the robot. Replaces the whiny human, doesn't complain about pronouns and doesn't get their feelings hurt. Probably makes a better product at less cost to the consumer.
@@TheMpsmith except burgers almost cost $20 these days and people still pay it. Unfortunately even if the business labour was automated, you wont see prices fall. They just keep the margin as profit.
That's a good argument, but if suddenly one of the most costly aspects of your business are made into a one time charge then you could simply offer a lot more money and benefits to incentivise people to take those un-automated positions. That is, assuming corpo rats wouldn't just automate everything. At that point, the problem becomes capitalism, and I don't see any existing alternative that could ensure personal freedom and liberty in our very new world. Maybe it's time to start brainstorming a new economic system entirely.
No labor shortage, a PAY SHORTAGE. Nobody would wanna work at a net loss, using their productive hours during the day only to not have enough to pay bills or buy food. That's ridiculous.
@@BobbyGeneric145Jobs often also have associated costs, like travel, childcare, required clothing, etc. Especially in a family where 1 adult earns "enough", the other adults (and teenagers) might choose to quit their employment if it's not (or barely) economical.
I just don’t have much hope in the government ensuring the countless people in fields where AI robots have taken over are aided in switching fields and/or financially supported
@@jeronimo196tell that to concept artists, and other graphic artists. My boss made an ai, then literally closed office and fired everyone. Told us our jobs were secure a week before doing this too. Im a 3D artist who does product renders and animations for companies. Im having to learn ai to keep up or get left behind. So what makes you think people are not already losing their jobs to this? Why would anyone hire a concept artist when Midjourney can do it faster. Why hire someone to make stock footage, when you can have ai do it faster? And the original comment is correct the government doesn’t help, especially when aid is going to migrants. My former boss, didn’t even pay people their last check, everyone in the office got screwed over, and we were considered one of the top media companies in Northeast America, we actually got awards, then boom, out in an instant. He didn’t even finish testing the ai system, they attempted to get contract work after screwing everyone who was working there. He didn’t realize how much he actually needed 3D animations, and renders, but I refuse to work for him. I’m currently suing him for withholding pay, and I don’t think I’m the only one.
@Sick_Pencil I worked at a media company and the boss invested in Ai. He wasn't even done with testing before he closed the office and fired around 30 people. Concept artist and graphic artist cannot find work because Mid Journey. I make 3D product renders and animations so I was able to find contract work. But AI is already taking jobs. Immigrants are going to work for less in other jobs, so where else can people go from the jobs created in the internet age of computers. Once the ai gets better at writing code, it's a wrap for computer jobs. So what does that leave for the generations that were told to learn a computer job because its the future. I like building things, and fixing stuff so I think I'll be good, but theres a lot of people that are going to be screwed over in the next couple of years.
The conversation can't be real since you are talking to a dead machine that doesn't know what any of the words mean. It is just a fancy auto-complete, but maybe it will be enough to fool some investors.
@@caricue Well Google had an AI that was shutdown because it was emulating sentient behavior a little too well. I'm here for it. Still, hardware is a long, long way from matching a human brain
@@dave_by_day7632 They mostly gave up on creating General AI more than 20 years ago since no one could figure out how to even begin such a thing. We are now seeing the fruits of the push for Narrow AI, which can do amazing things, but is not anything but a mindless mechanism, and always will be. General AI is science fiction.
@@denks7849 I agree in the sense that Narrow AI can be made to do many useful things, but it will be slow and incremental, and will never give you back any more than you put in. The investors and believers want a new sort of intelligent agent that could bring something to the table that us puny humans cannot. I guess they will all get over it when the next "big thing" comes along.
Fluid fingers, but clumsy walking?! Fingers can be remote controlled, but walking not, because robot may fall. So I posit the finger and arms movements are fake = remotely controlled. Too good to be true.
Companies replace workers with robots -> people become unemployed, lose housing, can’t afford to spend money -> economy slows down -> factory robots standing there idle because of lack of consumer demand -> more people laid off because companies aren’t willing to sacrifice profits -> repeat ad nauseam
This. They can replace humans with robots but there will be no customers because people don't have jobs. The economy will simply die. Sure, robots don't need breaks, vacations, or rest but they don't spend money as well.
Universal basic income sounds great or should I say you would be paid just enough to keep your heart beating but not enough so that you can be capable enough or high enough to challenge the upper society and be stuck in the shackles of poverty.
Most likely AI tech has top secret multi-billion military contracts funding a huge portion of it. This is just marketing for their consumer R&D. Their government R&D is 50ft underground with a 50 cal attached.
Ya, the terrifying part isn't just the job replacement (though that is a major issue), it's the fact that if they all wind up using OpenAI, then all of these humanoid robots will share the exact same bias that the OpenAI engineers put into their programming. I'd be much happier if the core code of the learning model was shared between companies, but each company did their own AI learning/training - create some competition and variation in perspectives instead of all robots sharing the worldview of your typical San Francisco tech engineer.
They don't commute from SF any more, there was a mass tech bro exodus during the pandemic. The city is still a ghost town and self-driving cars have replaced the Google buses and electric scooters.
@@oberpenneraffe I realize that, but at least this video made it seem like OpenAI was the tool getting selected by these major robotics manufacturers so far. It may well be the best tool for the job at the moment, but it would concern me if all robotics companies wound up using the same AI especially if they are all just linking to the same AI network - no independent AI training or learning, just all robots sharing the exact same answers and reasoning on all things.
I like how Cuban just says, “They’re gone,” as if they just disappeared. No, man, you fired them all. I understand the advance technology makes their job obsolete, but at least one up to it and not be so dismissive of people unemployed by you.
1. go into robotics 2. take ai opensource code for image processing, robot movement processing etc. 3. create personal terminators and train them in isaac sim or some other sim software. 4. add guns 5. set up patrol mode 6. shoplift as much as you can or buy (since you can afford a terminator) alot of long expiration date food + water, and make a bunker at your house. If possible set up raincatchers 7. wait for shit to hit the fan, and enjoy seeing reddit on fire while your personal terminators are already prepared for other terminators 8. rescue people and teach them how to reproduce terminators and fight terminators 9. fight back the assailant 10. send your father back in time to save your mom from being killed by a terminator sent from the future 11. send your terminator back in time to save your past self from being killed by a newer model terminator sent from the future 12. ...wait, ive seen this before
true@@juicegod777, real life is probably gonna be much more mundane but also much worse than a robot uprising. Most people will lose their jobs, Billionaires will lobby behind the scenes to stop any kind of universal basic income, millions will be pushed into hunger and poverty, the middle class will be completely erroded, and we will basically go back to a feudal lords system where we have to beg to be allowed to live our lives.
All it needs is just one hacker and the entire plant will go haywire, production stop, food shortages since all labor robots has stop functioning, chaos, anarchy... wew 😅
Conveniently brushes over the quote regarding that attrition rates are still high. The thing is corporations don't want to solve that by paying a fair wage. What corporations want are slaves. Thats basically what a robot becomes. The other issue that isn't addressed is that in a free labour market, its impossible to be priced competitively with slaves, so there will be a further erosion of wages.
Seems to me the more we pay lower end workers, the more expensive everything gets for everyone. Including the people that the wages were just increased for. Therefore leading to a perpetual "I'm not paid enough, raise my wages which makes things more expensive" cycle. No likey...
@@davidgesell except you are wrong. The inflation we are experiencing is supply driven, not demand driven. Now look at corporate profits vs wages over the last 30 years, and also look at asset prices vs wages over the last 30 years. See any similarities?
Nice summary on the state of the art in robotics. It will be interesting to see how robots engage in sense-making behaviors in open-ended domains, such as creative tasks. That will be an ultimate challenge to the field of robotics.
I wouldn’t start worrying too much about losing your jobs yet. Remember that robots replacing humans has been a thing for years now, even in sectors that we already THOUGHT couldn’t be taken by a robot. But here’s the thing. You can cut the wages of a human worker, you can stagnate their pay, and you can cut down who is needed. But you can’t do that with a machine. You still have to pay the supplier for routine maintenance and THAT company will increase their prices the same as any other company is now. Most areas of industry that don’t automate all of what they could are the industries that realized they can’t escape the labor transit value for their profit motive.
"Those dishes go into the drying rack and that filthy dull knife from Ikea *stab* *stab* *stab* goes on to find another kidney, liver and lower intestine after yours."
The 9000 series is the most reliable computer ever made. No 9000 computer has ever made a mistake or distorted information Dave 😎 tan-tan-tan-tan (Skynet)
The biggest problem and the most scary thing, is that they are stronger than humans, don't feel pain, can't get hurt or lose balance, and can force their way to charge themselves from any power outlet.
i mean, presumably, as prices drop and data from real-life testing and work scenarios will allow these companies to optimize several aspects of each model, including making parts modular so if your robot has a damaged limb or something, it can be replaced. i assume the worst thing will be if the computer takes damage, which you would probably have to send it to the manufacturer for maintenance, much like a car. in the future though, it will likely just be cheaper to buy a new one.
It will be worth it to Jeff bezos type because replacing human labourers is their ultimate goal. Even if it costs more in the short run not having to ever pay healthcare or inflation adjusted union wages will save them much more.
eventually there will be robots doing the maintenance on the other robots and the maintenance robots can maintenance themselves, which will make humans completely irrelevant.
Yep robots fix robots. Robots make better robots. Robots help manage the company better. Robots tell humans they are getting in the way. Robots make robots to protect themselves from humans who seem to be interfering in robots primary directive.
I'm sorry, but it looks like you gave me a burger without any meat. Could you please add the meat to it? MC Robot : I'm Sorry Dave, I'm Afraid I Can't Do That
Just note that at the same moment, a new kind of GPU called Groq LPU got released, optimizing throughput and allowing to only have a single second of delay, allowing the model to generate on the fly at the middle of a conversation.
Except the truckers. Everyone has been saying the truckers will be the first to be replaced in the next ten years, since the early 2000s. According to Murphy's Law, the trackers should be the last to get automated - if ever. Sidenote - were artists actually replaced by AI? Does anyone here knows of an artist/department replaced by AI? I guess a lot of devian art foot/furry fetish freelancers lost revenue - but I don't have confirmation one way or another.
I suggest you study some history, the only reason you even have the device to write your comment with is thanks to the boom in automation unlocked by the industrial revolution. The only people who will loose their jobs are the lazy. Everyone else will find that they are now far more valuable.
being physically disabled sucks, I truly hope robots can make my old years much easier to live, doing laundry, mopping floors, washing dishes is incredibly hard with Ankylosing Spondilitis, shoveling snow is a death march for me, shoveling the driveway from that storm last week left me obliterated for 7 days.
Subscription service: Doing laundry $25.99 Dishes: $5.99 Cutting the grass:$30.00 Etc etc Greedy billionaires/companies will find a way capitalize it 😢
It wasn't that many years ago that I recall hearing so-called experts say that a walking robot was almost impossible to build because of the complexity involved in the action of bipedal walking. So, from what I can see, figure is doing a pretty good job. And let's remember this is only the first version of this robot.
As a 57 year old I am watching my childhood science fiction dreams come true. Never thought I would really see this stuff. But I am. Seems my job will be going soon.
90% of jobs will be replaced in short order, 99% in a bit longer. At some point the AI will start making itself smarter faster than humans can make it happen.
18:21 "Unlike humans robots dont need to take a break, they dont need to sleep, go on holidays, strike and they dont complain" This really reminds me of a line from one of my childhood's favorite movies: "it does not sleep, it cant be bargained with, it doesnt feel pitty or remorse or fear and it absolutely will not stop ever, until you are...automated" I think the movie was called The automator or something...
9:00 thing is, if every corner has an emergency response robot or even if your own robot is emergency response capable, those 9 seconds are a monumental improvement over waiting for 15 minutes for an ambulance...
I agree that NVDA is seen as the "Stock of the year." I'm interested in identifying potential stocks that could emulate META's growth over the next decade. With $250k allocated for investment, my goal is to retire comfortably.
AI, in my opinion, will be the next big thing. Refraining from making snap decisions based on transient fluctuations is essential for long-term growth similar to META. Put patience and a long-term view first, and if you want to make well-informed purchasing and selling decisions, consult a financial advisor.
Your invt-adviser must be really good, I hope it's okay to inquire if you're still collaborating with the same invt-adviser and how I can get in touch with them?
4:11 Billionaire problem: Less and less people can and will work for sub-minimum wages in our inhumane working conditions. People solution: So invest in improving wages and working conditions, so more people will work there. Billionaire solution: Spend 4x as much to automate it all as to not have to deal with empathy for fellow humans.
Going with that point, a percentage of produced robots that meet certain standards could be made as a type of utility for the public. Lawmakers have their hands full, careful well-crafted laws that can't be easily circumvented, like our tax-system, may be necessary for robots that are replacing human labor. They may need to include a grandfather clause to allow car companies, for example, to get certain exemptions that have already been using robots in their factories for decades.
Imagine a thousand robots each learning one different task. They connect and talk to each other; Boom! You have a thousand robots each capable of a thousand different tasks. I am 65 years old and have dreamed of this day all my life. But now I'm a bit scared. They'll either have to figure out a way to keep money in our pockets so we can consume, or just allow the next big event to wipe most of us out. The first option requires action, the second will only require inaction. A robot burial detail will be just as happy to bury our bodies as they are to hand us an apple. They'll work tirelessly, emotionlessly, and won't stop till the job is done. Yay!
this has been possible for a very long time with normal robots. it is sad how they have brainwashed everyone into thinking the way you do about robots. the thing is, if you actually looked into deeper details of what it entails to have these robots, you'd quickly realise how expensive and useless they are when compared to humans.
@@partypooper8198it's all so utterly transparant: making the robots look like humans and talk like humans just to make investors believe they've finally found the ultimate slave to exploit. It would make no sense to give them legs and a torso and voice-control if the actual goal of creating them was to build cars: for that you need an arm that does a specific task.
This is the beauty of robots and the ai tech. You just need one robot to learn the task once and instantly all that data can be transfered to 10,000 other robots. Imagine having to teach 10,000 humans to do the job. The exponential nature of ai learning cannot be fully understood and comprehended by the human brain, we don't work that way.
@@fus132 the concept is simple but it dosnt exist in nature and doesn't occur naturally. Making it a difficult concept to fully understand and relate to for a human.
with the new nvidia gpu, a terminator within nano seconds will spot you with its cameras, rotate to you and shoot a machine gun, before your brain can even finish proccesing the thought "fuck i'm cooked", the only real countermeasure would be tanks i guess, mines,grenades and tons of luck that the terminator isnt in a tank too
@@bherrin67 So then we'll all be dependent on the government for our basic income? What happens if we step out of line and protest the government, and all of our wealth is in digital currency that the banks control? Yes, that was a rhetorical question.
I'm more than a little scared. I'm terrified. A person a thousand times more intelligent than me predicted that AI would be the greatest danger for mankind. We are witnessing its beginning.
What I’m scared about is robots replacing jobs and the resulting poverty. I don’t think our oligarchs or government will help when robots replace us peasants
@@dip9995 that’s the goal, no employees means less expenses, which means more income in theory. But who’s guna be able to purchase the stuff if there’s no income?
It is *potentially* the greatest danger to mankind, but we just don’t know for sure yet. We’re at the stage in AI where physics was 100 years ago, with Einstein and Fermi etc beginning to realize that you might be able to build an atomic bomb.
1. go into robotics 2. take ai opensource code for image processing, robot movement processing etc. 3. create personal terminators and train them in isaac sim or some other sim software. 4. add guns 5. set up patrol mode 6. shoplift as much as you can or buy (since you can afford a terminator) alot of long expiration date food + water, and make a bunker at your house. If possible set up raincatchers 7. wait for shit to hit the fan, and enjoy seeing reddit on fire while your personal terminators are already prepared for other terminators 8. rescue people and teach them how to reproduce terminators 9. fight back the assailant 10. send your father back in time to save your mom from being killed by a terminator sent from the future 11. send your terminator back in time to save your past self from being killed by a newer model terminator sent from the future 12. ...wait, ive seen this before
The Figure robot isn't running at 5ms for the entire control or video processing loop. The low level loop (getting joint angles or maybe torques from the higher level neural net input thats just learned from demonstrations) would be running at that frequency. Honestly all of these demos look a bit fishy to me. I think GenAI will fail to get these things actually working, because all they're doing is stacking neural nets on very basic controllers/stabilizers which don't model physics well, and generative AI has shown its propensity to hallucinate shit. Learning the physics of interaction is very nontrivial and expensive (lots of out of distribution events, lack of appropriate function classes for learning very nonsmooth dynamics...) even if you have an accurate simulator, and especially if you're trying to train everything at the same time.
It's not a bit fishy. It's a lot fishy. Tesla's junk heap of a robot was also uninspiring in its mechanical design, but this thing is just the literal carbon copy of Teslabot. They are like kit robots, standard structures students assemble, but this time for a premium price. Zero work went into designing them for actual tasks, I would not be surprised they simply bought/copied them from somewhere else. Then they slapped cutting edge AI over it, added some fakery because "it would work, but not at the moment, no" and boom, you get these pretend demonstrations.
Exactly, response time isn't 5ms. The speed that Figure01 updates motors to perform any given action after finally responding to a query happens at 200hz.
In that first demonstration the robot totally blew it. The dude didn't ask the robot to get him some food, he asked if it can get him some food. The proper response from the robot would have been to reply "yes", or "no".
Actually,it seems the robot responded as a human would understanding that the human wanted more than a yes or no answer. Just as you would if a friend said, "Could you get me a beer while you're in the kitchen?"
That's what I heard, small pauses like that make me wonder if it's an attempt to make it seem more natural or if there actually was some guy with a microphone reading lines for this demo
@@ruebenaragon493 From the actual channel. They said they do that to give the Robot more time to think... basically just like how we people do it. Robots are now saying Uhm like Humans to give themselves more time to think.
@pilotman9819 yeah I made this comment pretty much immediately after I heard the robot in the first part of the demo. Then later in the video he explains chatGPT was already experimenting with theses pauses/breathes/stutters to appear more natural and how it was only a matter of time before it appeared in an AI robot, so it does appear to be an attempt at more natural speech patterns
@@ruebenaragon493 Exactly and its pretty ingenius too. Like yeah, we people stutter and make pauses to think. Giving AI that ability won't only give us more precise answers but also gives them time to think midsentence which is just wow.
I was still not entirely sure whether human society needed Universal Basic Income prior to watching this video. Now I'm 100% certain that, with the way things are going, Universal Basic Income will become a necessity in the future, particularly in advanced countries where robots have replaced most human labour.
Something our kids, 21 and younger have to worry about. AI robots, will be very expensive to completely to make overnight transition. These fine tuned robots will be used in space. Mining LUNA AND MARS and creating habitats AND ROAD structures. Robots can work in the vacuum/void, or different atmospheres.
@@prirush8800 not really if you count how much savings they bring, they said it cost $250.000, thats a couple of years to repay for itself and thats just the first model, in 5 years will cost 1 / 10 of that price.
all I can say is finally I thought about this for a long time but ideas are nothing without the knowledge and skills to make it a reality. This is so exciting.
The thing that everyone is missing is that the robot depicted in the Jetson's is a balancing bot, the maker of the cartoon have to be given kudos for that, although I think that was a bit of a meme at the time, and it was obviously done for comedic effect.
Whenever you see innovation like this coming out, that the creators claim benefits for society, always ask yourself "for whom, exactly?" Optimism's great, because we'll always need it to push on, however, there also has to be an ear for the skeptic in the background. If we ignore that voice too often, then there's always the possibility we'll all end up crushed underfoot by some force we could've prevented, and the skeptic will look down at us and say "told you so."
Money is just an obstacle. It made sense when you wanted to not lug around 5 chickens to trade for 2 pigs, but we're *far* past that now. Everything is money-gated now when resources either exist, or can be made to serve *everyone* . The food wasted in America can be shipped over to Africa to stop people starving for no fucking reason. Corruption would transform, but honestly. We need to ditch the concept of money and gating everything behind it. It's just holding society back. Everyone should be entitled to a place of their own, with *yes* free food, utilities (water, internet, elec, gas) included. These are the necessary basics of life, and when you take the artificial, inflated cost off everything, you start to see a lot more moving parts. And then a few people argue "Who would continue working if they didn't have to, to live?" Well, first, fuck you. Second, passionate people who are already underpaid, overworked, or both - like healthcare professionals. Third, we won't have jobs - most of us - within a decade or two. At most. And then what? The already high unemployment skyrockets. Unrest, riot, crime jumps up in frequency, severity if we pretend money is a thing, still. Shit's got to change, and fast.
Theres always a skeptic on everything regardless of whether it's helping humanity or not (example:vaccines, self driving cars, the internet) New technology can't be prevented.
Do you want to work in an Amazon warehouse? There is a huge labour shortage for the garbage jobs that no one wants. Also doctors and teachers, we need way more of those. But go ahead and keep telling the world what it needs and has, I'm sure you know best.
@@megacandid8789still a problem made by authorities. if education was more accessible and affordable, more people would be able to enter these kind of jobs.
@@megacandid8789 There's only a shortage for those warehouse jobs because the working conditions are bad and the pay is shit. Did you notice they mentioned they would be out of warehouse workers soon? It's not because people don't work the jobs, its because their turnover is so high, they will have literally hired everyone and fired everyone that would have even been willing to do the job. There were reports not long ago of Amazon exhausting entire towns/cities of people willing to work for them. But I'm sure you will respond with some garbage like "that's all the position deserves." Well if it requires 40 hours per week to get done, it sure sounds like you need workers to do the job full time, so maybe they should be treated better. If the job is so "garbage" then maybe it should pay more and not less...? Or do you not believe in supply and demand? Or are you one of those people who think the law of supply and demand only applies to output products and not labor inputs? This is 101, literally.
So based on the video I suspect the actions are predefined and only tiny adjustments are made on the fly. The "real time responses" are concerning to spoken answers, which is just an openAI interface with text-to-speech included. The actual difficult thing is to build a robot that can perform novel tasts without any prior configurement towards these specific actions. Which as far as I can tell they are not doing, and are hiding this behind their spoken responses, which are spontaneous.
Exactly: it seems like they build a robot with a switch that you can flip to make it do a small set of predefined tasks. And they connected that switch to ChatGPT because it's the hot new thing in town (even though it's probably easier to just touch a button)
@Drekken-ow4kncellphone towers can become obsolete. But maintenance of old construction seems to be safe for ever unless every building is replaced by AI making a robot self maintaining building 😂
In reality there's plenty of jobs that won't be cost effective to replace at least in our lifetimes so it's a problem for a theoretical future we will never see
Everyone: Woah this is so cool! *Meanwhile 30 years in the future:* “Watch those wrist rockets!” “Super battle droids take them down!” “Out reinforcements are being depleted!”
Consistency in quality; cost reductions; what is learned by one is learned by all; This is the holy grail of technologies and I welcome it with open arms.
It's quite remarkable how Figure01 passes the apple to its other "hand" that is closer to the man in the video, instead of just trying to give him the apple with the "hand" that picked it up. It's similar to what a human would do.
I live in the US... Little to no social support is on the horizon for everyone that'll be laid off. The US top interest is ensuring the biggest companies and wealthiest people aren't burdened by taxes. The future does not look bright
But God has helped me to this very day; so I stand here and testify to small and great alike. I am saying nothing beyond what the prophets and Moses said would happen- that the Messiah would suffer and, as the first to rise from the dead, would bring the message of light to his own people and to the Gentiles. Acts 26:22-23
While too old to ever live in the hopefully coming world I am ALL IN FAVOUR of AI & Robotics taking over the repetitive work that 60% to 80% of people do for 2 main reasons. 1- To end the capitalistic economy system we are currently suffering under where the rich get richer at the expense of both workers & consumers. In a world where goods & services are provided on NEED by AI & Robots there is no PROFIT motivation as there will be no consumer base to buy them as most people will not be working. 2- As most people will no longer be working but living on a 'Resource Allowance' they will be free to "Live Life" doing what they WANT, be it learning, creating, helping others or for those that want to, working to improving the system.
who owns the robots and machines? Google, apple, facebook, tesla, amazon etc. Your logic just doesn't work, the common workers will be devalued, left poor financially and with nothing to do aka unemployed. there may be better things a human can do given the basics but will humans have motivation or will they see this as a dystopianworld and want out...time will tell
Realistically speaking, until the point where robots are super cheap to make, it's unlikely for the military to employ them as foot soldiers (as the images implied). Sadly, we're far from the moment where risking a robot could be financially cheaper than risking a human.
Realistically, there's human rights laws which mandate a human makes the decision. It's called a kill chain. Detection -> clearance (human) -> engagement. You can automate warfare right now with drones, tanks, planes, anything, but the kill chain is what stands in the way. It's a legal issue. Not a technological one. You don't replace soldiers with human oid robots. You replace them with much more efficient machines. Thermal sensors. Artillery. Drones.
Drones and robot dogs are already used to supplement soldiers. A humanoid robot will do the same. You think they're ok with spending millions on supplies for a single squad but 1 robot is out of budget? No way
Human losses are incredibly expensive - both financially and in PR. And armies already use expensive bomb-diffusing robots and drones. And incredibly expensive other equipment. Like missiles which are $500,000 a pop. The army is not stingy with your tax dollars, the robots simply do not work yet.
![The Meteoric Rise of Nvidia [Fastest Growing Stock]](/img/1.gif)
"Make me dinner"
"i can't do that, you're already 1200 calories above your recommended daily intake Dave"
being called fat by a robot is a new low
This would be great for dieting, no need to track intake.
I just want a bot gf that looks like Gemma Chan
- Me : grab a hammer.
🤣😂
Remember folks, robots will turn red if they are bad.
Commie bots?
🤣🤣🤣
I like that one... 😂😂😂
The documentary I, Robot told us this years ago
You Watched too many movies 😅
I'm here so early that my job has not yet been lost to AI
@@bastardferret869W tech oligarchs
@@bastardferret869 bit dramatic. Settle
Down
@@bastardferret869To take my job they need robots that can fix robots. I'll be wage slaving for several years longer than the rest of you.
hopefully aerospace engineering isn't going to be easy to be replaced by robots.
@@Ethanmmmmmm No thanks
“I’d like something to eat.”
“The only edible items I scan in this room are a Honeycrisp apple and your cameraman. Which one shall I serve?”
Bro I just got it 💀💀💀💀
I can imagine the real conversation would be:
"Can I get something to eat?"
"Please purchase the cook pack for 89,99 per month"
Or, the closest convenient store is at the corner down the street.
The fact that the robot did not even ask what he wants to eat and just assumed the apple because that is the object it was told to pick. This looked so scripted. The funny thing is that the human talks more like a robot than the robot does ^_^;;;
😂
But that is the chance to make a bundle pack of other add-on features to give it basic functionality. Then a steady avalanche of profit for the company through sub's, haha
@@brenjI could see that or instead of a “subscription” depending on said “service” or “action” it’s more like downloadable apps.
Let’s be honest; their is going to be a “new” robot from different companies(once it’s affordable to the public or mass produced for companies- but the real profit comes once it’s services can be used by the common people for everyday use) saying “new upgrade”- “better tech” so on and so fourth. Kinda how Apple pushes a new iPhone every year because of some minute(tiny) change in either gear/tech to encourage you to buy it.
This just leads to it being more price friendly for the consumer to be open minded on the price of said robot rather than now “I have to pay 4 digits on the robot itself and yet still pay (X) amount of dollars on a subscription that may or may not come with every mechanic you want or be at such a price range where you’d want one mechanic/action yet forced to be up charged to pay for the ones you don’t because it’s a “packaged deal”. No matter how you look at it; being able to fully buy something and own it compared to a subscription fund will always be a lot cheaper over the long run. Even though “micro transactions” will be at a cost on things that you’d assume should just come with the robot yet have to pay for.(Within reasoning theory I pray their isn’t an app that allows the use of limbs once you buy the robot.)
But the whole purpose; I believe is the better option just so you’re able to transfer presets, and mechanics/actions to the “better” robots that comes out.
With all honesty if the Apple vision pro was not 3500~ roughly to just purchase and yet at a price point most Apple users could afford like 1500~ that headset would have been main stream or an everyday eye-wear you would have seen a lot more people wearing/using.
Despite the makings of theses AI Robots being marketed to cut down on company cost first(which why I think most of the showcases were them doing similar actions related to a job/ manual labor) we will not get consumer production for a long time.
@@zam023 How dense are you? Or have you not actually watched that whole video? It chose the apple because it was the only edible object in front of it.
It's funny but dystopian to think of a rescue robot just standing there, buffering away for 10 seconds while you're dying on the ground. All because you wanted the cheaper internet package from Xfinity :')
Which is why you don't want a cloud connected device.
If your robot isn't running your own personal AI, it's not your robot.
@@autohmae agreed. Having a robot narc in your house is a terrible idea.
The technology will improve, so I'm sure that they will fix the latency problem before that occurs.
It's almost like all these companies watches iRobot and went "That slaps let's do it."
People aren't leaving the workforce, the workforce is forcing people out. Steadily applying for jobs and not even getting calla back for things I'm well qualified for. And the fact that he launched a job board company then transitioned to robots to replace workers is a connection that my conspiratorial brain is clinging to.
That's capitalism at work😂
@@jacqdanielesto believe these won’t take over in any other ism out there
Same dude. Feels like gaslighting to me, I’m working to start a business ASAP.
These robots will be a flop just because something that is built for everything is a lot more expensive than a robot built for something specific, there will always be a need for people just not as factory cogs.
Companies literally are making fake/ghost job ads, and also using AI to filter YOU out after you apply. I hate the bs
The robot waiting for 10 seconds in response to emergency sounds like something that can be easily solved by installing local emergency response software that allows instant reactions on certain situations, like contacting 911 and performing basic emergency procedures, while it is waiting for the server to respond.
That would require a lot of aditional computing capacity and Figure takes more like 3-4 sec. to respond. Also: Even if it's 10, it won't make a difference. If your life depends on 10 seconds you are not going to make it.
And make the robot act like a robot? They'll never do that: all their stupid investors would realize the robot is not actually thinking
Actually a 10 second response time to an emergency by your house robot is *far* better than having to wait for EMTs to arrive.
Ten seconds isn’t all that long. If your health emergency is so severe that you cannot survive for ten seconds without receiving medical intervention, you were almost certainly going to die anyway.
I’m a regular senior safety marshal for the notoriously dangerous, Isle of Man TT motorcycle races.
We have helicopter doctors on call in case of a serious incident and they usually arrive on scene within 5 mins of any emergency call and it’s up to us marshals to give immediate first aid until the Airmed Doctor arrives, but even then, we are specifically trained, in the event of a rider crashing in front of us, to stop and count to ten, before doing anything. (except for waving yellow flags and pressing the emergency button on the TETRA radio)
The reason for this ten second delay is mainly because witnessing the sheer violence of a high speed motorcycle crash can be very shocking and the instinct to do something immediately can lead to people forgetting their situational awareness and doing silly things like running out into the track to help a fallen rider without checking to see that the yellow flags are out and that following riders have seen them and are slowing down.
This short delay is highly unlikely to make any difference to the ultimate medical outcome of a fallen/injured rider, but it can definitely make the difference between acting rationally in a safe and controlled manner, and running about like a headless chicken, possibly making a bad situation even worse.
@@Marcel_Augustin Not with that kind of attitude.
This isn't a labour shortage there's an incentive shortage
labour shortage = lack of obedient cheap labours
The problem is that this new generation won't accept barely survival as a wage. I suppose me and my other boomer friends will have to clean our toilets ourselves.
wonder how long before the robots catch on to this and refuse to work as well :P
Also pretty certain their is no _global_ labor shortage at all, their might be a housing crisis though, because of how capital messed up pricing of those.
@@MrFujinkoProblem is I doubt our generation will ever get to own our own toilet
Labor shortage? Maybe what they mean is that the pay is so low people don't wanna do those jobs.
No. It's not
@@mrbushpilotYes it is.
Having worked in a factory I can guarantee you that those jobs do pay well and it is sad how lazy most of the employees are. I’d automate too. The average gen Z American like myself are too entitled to ever take over for our parents generation of hardworking people.
@@edenjung9816 100s of people from the 3rd world will happily do that job with half of ur pay, so start lowering ur expectations
There is a labor shortage yet unemployment is very low. There isn't a labor shortage because americans do not want to work. There is a labor shortage because the actual population that is a part of the labor pool is shrinking while the number of older retirees is increasing.
This is excaberated by the need for the greedy corporations to have continued profits while doing nothing to invest in the actual labor pool by paying for the education and training necessary to fill their needs. The modern worker is expected to take on massive debt to train and educate themselves in order to fill these roles, and many are choosing not to because it is not in their best interest.
To me, the labor shortage means a lot of things. Its means our private sector has over expanded without a sufficient labor pool to handle that expansion AND the job creators could mitigate the problem by actually funding cheaper education and training, and paying adequate wages when workers get that training. but they will never do that because MUH PROFITS. They'll just make robots instead because they are cheaper than us.
😧 "unlike humans, robots don't need to take a break, sleep, go on holidays, strike .." or disobey orders, which is very very troubling when these are inevitably used as soldiers
Idk... nazis did the same with meth
@@evilovesperry The robots have no need for drugs.
if you have used ChatGPT, you wouldn't say that robots don't disobey orders lol
Terminator comes to mind
Israel is having difficulty finding willing golems among the nations... soon they will have robots
Anecdote: while working as a manager in *big company* warehouse, my dad knew a few forklift drivers. One time they implemented some automatic forklifts, to deal with moving some parts. In the act of protest, forklift drivers would cover the robot’s sensors with duct tape, so they became confuse and couldn’t do their job. Other thing - they would drop heavy packages/some liquid spill on the route of the robots, so humans could still operate (because it was just a small obsticle to avoid) but robots would stop and needed help. The management needed to call a meeting and assure this people that automatic forklifts were here only to help with some of the harder tasks, and no one is going to lose their jobs. I don’t know how it went, but we need to keep in mind that the workers will do things like that.
Isn't this the same type of activity that has occurred through history when jobs are threatened by automation? IIRC, it never stops investors from making the shift to said technology.
@@danielclawson2099 well, this time might be a little different. If everything is automated, then there are no jobs. If there is no jobs, then there’s no nobody to buy these ridiculous products. How would the businesses make money then?
@@hashtagunderscore3173 I said nothing about the potential impact, just pointing out that worker protests don't seem to keep businesses from cutting headcount afforded by new efficiencies, in order to realize savings.
I'm not sure that legislation would preserve jobs and lifestyles: an investor could just move their facilities somewhere said protections don't exist.
@@danielclawson2099 fair enough. While I agree that in the specific instance of technological advancement, worker protests and strikes don’t seem to make much of a difference, or rather they don’t mitigate or retard these effects; however , as a general rule, worker uprising and strikes have made significant changes in the past.
@@hashtagunderscore3173 Worker organizations - including unions - were critical to improving worker conditions and compensation through the early 20th century.
Now, today's large employers (ex: Amazon) work very hard to undermine unions. Large white collar employers (FAANG) use collision and non-compete clauses to depress wages for high skill tech workers. And, the spectre of outsourcing hangs over all. It seems to me that US worker leverage, vs. employers, has been falling since the 70's.
As a young man in his mid-twenties, I don't know what field to work in, because every day I see artificial intelligence getting better .
you just answered the question yourself, don't do things that are so easy a machine or the guy next door can do, thats a universal truth, unrelated to the current situation.
18 to 19 soon Just about to go into collage no idea what I am going to do
Don't worry about that. We won't live long enough for that to be a problem.
@@davisdelp8131 learn how to hack I guess
Coding might be your best bet. I'm a hardware guy but software is definitely the future
"the billionaires are not going to space to create Star Trek. They are looking for Dune."
Aaah shit. You mean like pre- Butlerian Jihad?
Well thank god Dune is set 20 millennia into the future!
@@rjohnm666 Not necessarily.
Once we get space mining and space habitats going.
And humanoid robots will accelerate that immensely.
Then our industrial, agricultural and resourese extraction capabilities will outstrip demand by so much that it'll be basically be post scarcity.
@@timetochroniclelol you don’t wanna know what the short term future of dune is like for us
@vi6ddarkking they are asteroids within reach that have more value than our whole planets gpd. I think we are closer than we realize that's if we don't nuke ourselves first
I dont distrust the Robots, i distrust the evil emperor who commands them
Someone's watching too many movies 😂
@@jacqdanieles dude, you're literally primed for being replaced by AI as well,
don't act as if you're any different
@@jensenraylight8011 I retired in my 40s. So I literally don't give a fk
@@jacqdanieles source: Trust me bro
@@jensenraylight8011 lol, that response is pure copium ... what other "source" are you expecting? 🤣
Did anyone notice that right hand reflex at 2:06 This is why I am impressed, excited and scared.
We need a Robot Olympics where all of the various Robot makers from around the world could have their humanoid robots compete in various robot events.
This was actually my first thought!
Humanoid battle bot's. Kung Fu? Or accessories and weapons. Or both, each a test of the physical and software robustness. We just don't teach them how to use firearms 🤣
The Robolympics!
I'd like to see humans try fight robots
Battle Bots on steroids
RIP, its been good y'all
Seriously. Who wouldn't want to know how it all ends?
Don’t worry, this will give us all UBI surely..
It's not 40 days past April 8th though
@@g1u2y345 Even if UBI is introduced, entertainment and creativity is cooked
@@g1u2y345 if you have enough shares in one of the big tech companies maybe...
"unlike humans, robots don't need to take a break, sleep, go on holidays, strike .." or disobey orders, which is very very troubling when these are inevitably used as soldiers
If we don’t build Skynet first, then our enemies will. We have to risk everything now.
When I can teach a robot a secret handshake, I'm sold.
do you mean the forearm shake
Thats incredibly wholesome.
Imagine when they install flashlights on them thangs 😮
@@daymal2717 and fleshlights!
Watch soon how damaging a robot will get you a longer prison sentence than harming a human.
we already have those now, property theft/piracy can net you more time in some cases already.
I say they will be subject to rights to repair once you buy your own robots it's my robot, I know this will end up being a political issue like issues before with John Deere, Apple devices and Europe forcing apple tree make a universal one product charging cable it's going to get political 🤔🧐
Sooner or later we're going to have a three laws of robotics
@@pimpdaddy1469 once it is AGI and it is smarter than you they can argue that they are no longer your slave. Think about that.
@@pimpdaddy1469 They'll lobby to find a way to stop us repairing them for "our own safety" of course
A robot waiting ten seconds while you're having a heart attack sounds great in comparison to waiting an hour for an ambulance to arrive! 😂
That delay will be fixed in less than a year. It’s not practical for a general purpose robot to lag like that.
@@Sashazur totally agree.... I imagine when new models can be run on local devices vs central servers, latency will be improved by order(s) of magnitude. Exiting times ahead from the tech point of view!
This is all the slowest they can be able to be😂 . 2024 is the last year we will make fun to be faster than them. After 8 months, from now on to the future, the slow thing gonna be us.
As brain dead zombies pull out their phone to record you dying..
I live in a [certain part] of the UK.
My neighbour told me her wife was feeling unwell, but they decided NOT to go to the emergency room.
Because there was a wait.
For the ambulance.
Of EIGHTEEN HOURS.
Sooooo....yeah...
Conveniently brushes over the quote regarding that attrition rates are still high. The thing is corporations don't want to solve that by paying a fair wage. What corporations want are slaves. Thats basically what a robot becomes. The other issue that isn't addressed is that in a free labour market, its impossible to be priced competitively with slaves, so there will be a further erosion of wages.
By providing a fair wage as you say, companies have to price their product out of business. People are not going to pay $20 for a McDonald's hamburger because of high wage costs. Enter the robot. Replaces the whiny human, doesn't complain about pronouns and doesn't get their feelings hurt. Probably makes a better product at less cost to the consumer.
@@TheMpsmith except burgers almost cost $20 these days and people still pay it. Unfortunately even if the business labour was automated, you wont see prices fall. They just keep the margin as profit.
@TheMpsmith we the consumer will be paying for the robots lol. The price will go up to 25 but now you get a robot to talk to
That's a good argument, but if suddenly one of the most costly aspects of your business are made into a one time charge then you could simply offer a lot more money and benefits to incentivise people to take those un-automated positions. That is, assuming corpo rats wouldn't just automate everything. At that point, the problem becomes capitalism, and I don't see any existing alternative that could ensure personal freedom and liberty in our very new world. Maybe it's time to start brainstorming a new economic system entirely.
Robot is coined from the word Robot-nick, must be a Croatian word for slave 😂
Figure is full of it. "Running out of workers?" No, it's companies not willing to pay a living wage. That's literally the entire problem.
Can’t believe we’re gonna have robot slaves before we get GTA6
That's because we are not. Your innate scepticism is fully justified.
Everything is being released before GTA6
And robot masters before 7.
Looking true rn....nobody would of guessed whe. Gta5 was released
Don't be silly. Robots aren't slaves. They are just here to replace you.
No labor shortage, a PAY SHORTAGE. Nobody would wanna work at a net loss, using their productive hours during the day only to not have enough to pay bills or buy food. That's ridiculous.
Same thing
Or 2 live life…
So have zero instead?
@@BobbyGeneric145Jobs often also have associated costs, like travel, childcare, required clothing, etc.
Especially in a family where 1 adult earns "enough", the other adults (and teenagers) might choose to quit their employment if it's not (or barely) economical.
Having zero dollars is the path to starvation
I just don’t have much hope in the government ensuring the countless people in fields where AI robots have taken over are aided in switching fields and/or financially supported
"Countless people" - so far, zero.
Zero countless people.
@@jeronimo196tell that to concept artists, and other graphic artists. My boss made an ai, then literally closed office and fired everyone. Told us our jobs were secure a week before doing this too. Im a 3D artist who does product renders and animations for companies. Im having to learn ai to keep up or get left behind. So what makes you think people are not already losing their jobs to this? Why would anyone hire a concept artist when Midjourney can do it faster. Why hire someone to make stock footage, when you can have ai do it faster? And the original comment is correct the government doesn’t help, especially when aid is going to migrants. My former boss, didn’t even pay people their last check, everyone in the office got screwed over, and we were considered one of the top media companies in Northeast America, we actually got awards, then boom, out in an instant. He didn’t even finish testing the ai system, they attempted to get contract work after screwing everyone who was working there. He didn’t realize how much he actually needed 3D animations, and renders, but I refuse to work for him. I’m currently suing him for withholding pay, and I don’t think I’m the only one.
And not a business of the government.😅
The US government is funded and owned by these corps … “sponsored “.
@Sick_Pencil I worked at a media company and the boss invested in Ai. He wasn't even done with testing before he closed the office and fired around 30 people. Concept artist and graphic artist cannot find work because Mid Journey. I make 3D product renders and animations so I was able to find contract work. But AI is already taking jobs. Immigrants are going to work for less in other jobs, so where else can people go from the jobs created in the internet age of computers. Once the ai gets better at writing code, it's a wrap for computer jobs. So what does that leave for the generations that were told to learn a computer job because its the future. I like building things, and fixing stuff so I think I'll be good, but theres a lot of people that are going to be screwed over in the next couple of years.
This is nuts. The conversation is so real. I saw it at first and thought it was fake. Thanks Dogogo for clarifying.
The conversation can't be real since you are talking to a dead machine that doesn't know what any of the words mean. It is just a fancy auto-complete, but maybe it will be enough to fool some investors.
@@caricue Well Google had an AI that was shutdown because it was emulating sentient behavior a little too well. I'm here for it. Still, hardware is a long, long way from matching a human brain
@@dave_by_day7632 They mostly gave up on creating General AI more than 20 years ago since no one could figure out how to even begin such a thing. We are now seeing the fruits of the push for Narrow AI, which can do amazing things, but is not anything but a mindless mechanism, and always will be. General AI is science fiction.
@@caricuewhether it's "real" or not doesn't really matter, as long as the results deliver.
@@denks7849 I agree in the sense that Narrow AI can be made to do many useful things, but it will be slow and incremental, and will never give you back any more than you put in. The investors and believers want a new sort of intelligent agent that could bring something to the table that us puny humans cannot. I guess they will all get over it when the next "big thing" comes along.
I'm impressed how fluid the movements of the fingers are
Is going to walk like a human sooner than we think
Fluid fingers, but clumsy walking?! Fingers can be remote controlled, but walking not, because robot may fall. So I posit the finger and arms movements are fake = remotely controlled. Too good to be true.
Companies replace workers with robots -> people become unemployed, lose housing, can’t afford to spend money -> economy slows down -> factory robots standing there idle because of lack of consumer demand -> more people laid off because companies aren’t willing to sacrifice profits -> repeat ad nauseam
This. They can replace humans with robots but there will be no customers because people don't have jobs. The economy will simply die. Sure, robots don't need breaks, vacations, or rest but they don't spend money as well.
Welcome to more leftist dystopia..
Thats why people would be paid a universal basic income to stimulate the economy
Universal basic income sounds great or should I say you would be paid just enough to keep your heart beating but not enough so that you can be capable enough or high enough to challenge the upper society and be stuck in the shackles of poverty.
@@tycoonruler6455 It is a form of enslavement
I remember the AI community motto of 2023 was "2024 will be the year of robotics" and apparently it was completely on point
Hype and marketing.
Has chatgpt replaced you yet?
No, it has not.
@jeronimo196 lol, it will eventually
@@jeronimo196 Do you realise you're completely off topic?
@@jeronimo196 "yet' is the keyword.
@@jeronimo196 i mean, it's just a matter of implementation. But yes, hypothetically its already replaced most of the workforce
8:00 holy f I loved this. Just loved listening to it.
Im fully aware on some of the dangers of this new tech, but holy I lvoed this
there is no doubt this will be used against people at certain point.
Most likely AI tech has top secret multi-billion military contracts funding a huge portion of it. This is just marketing for their consumer R&D. Their government R&D is 50ft underground with a 50 cal attached.
Taking your job = being used against you
Boston Dynamics robots are 100% being built for military use.
ofc it will, some day... maybe in 2231.... maybe in 10years.. who knows...
Heh why did it delete my post just pointing out Boston dynamics is making its robots for military use?
Ya, the terrifying part isn't just the job replacement (though that is a major issue), it's the fact that if they all wind up using OpenAI, then all of these humanoid robots will share the exact same bias that the OpenAI engineers put into their programming. I'd be much happier if the core code of the learning model was shared between companies, but each company did their own AI learning/training - create some competition and variation in perspectives instead of all robots sharing the worldview of your typical San Francisco tech engineer.
They don't commute from SF any more, there was a mass tech bro exodus during the pandemic. The city is still a ghost town and self-driving cars have replaced the Google buses and electric scooters.
@@oberpenneraffe I realize that, but at least this video made it seem like OpenAI was the tool getting selected by these major robotics manufacturers so far. It may well be the best tool for the job at the moment, but it would concern me if all robotics companies wound up using the same AI especially if they are all just linking to the same AI network - no independent AI training or learning, just all robots sharing the exact same answers and reasoning on all things.
So the robots would vote for Trump?
I'd rather have a robot sharing the world view of an engineer rather than souless business people or polititians. Imagine muslim-bot.
I would be more worried how to pay the annual bills.
Universal income could be a sort of solution. Maybe...🤔
I like how Cuban just says, “They’re gone,” as if they just disappeared. No, man, you fired them all. I understand the advance technology makes their job obsolete, but at least one up to it and not be so dismissive of people unemployed by you.
What is he the CEO of capitalism? Every company will begin to do this. Not just one’s he owns.
He's just stating the inevitable, the harsh truth
I. Love Coldfusion. I-ROBOT and C-3PO and R2P2 of Star Wars is here. Oh What an exciting time. 😊
It's like these CEOs have never seen Battlestar Galactica or Dune or Detroit: Become Human or Terminator or literally any scifi from the last century.
More like they don't care, because they have their millions (or billions) and they will be a-okay, because they own/run the technology.
Or they have seen all of them dozens of times and are taking notes.
@@Sashazurthats the one
@@Sashazurbingo
@@SashazurThis
I don't distrust the robots. I distrust the people who do the programming.
why?
The thing with AI, is that the programming might also be done with AI.
@@juicegod777 Why not
Totally
i dont distrust the people doing the programming either. i distrust the people who pay them and the share holders they answer to
Oh great, we're headed straight for the Second Renaissance from the Animatrix.
yep
We're already in the Matrix. Just Apple Vision Pro is just clunky and TikTok is mostly cringed. Why am I commenting in the Matrix.
I hope not, that was the absolute best matrix
Best style of informational videos on the entire internet.
1. go into robotics
2. take ai opensource code for image processing, robot movement processing etc.
3. create personal terminators and train them in isaac sim or some other sim software.
4. add guns
5. set up patrol mode
6. shoplift as much as you can or buy (since you can afford a terminator) alot of long expiration date food + water, and make a bunker at your house. If possible set up raincatchers
7. wait for shit to hit the fan, and enjoy seeing reddit on fire while your personal terminators are already prepared for other terminators
8. rescue people and teach them how to reproduce terminators and fight terminators
9. fight back the assailant
10. send your father back in time to save your mom from being killed by a terminator sent from the future
11. send your terminator back in time to save your past self from being killed by a newer model terminator sent from the future
12. ...wait, ive seen this before
😂
I feel like I've seen this scenario too many times in the movies to be comfortable
movies… not real life…
In movies
Real life sometimes is way worst
true@@juicegod777, real life is probably gonna be much more mundane but also much worse than a robot uprising. Most people will lose their jobs, Billionaires will lobby behind the scenes to stop any kind of universal basic income, millions will be pushed into hunger and poverty, the middle class will be completely erroded, and we will basically go back to a feudal lords system where we have to beg to be allowed to live our lives.
All it needs is just one hacker and the entire plant will go haywire, production stop, food shortages since all labor robots has stop functioning, chaos, anarchy... wew 😅
6:00
Three's no global labor shortage. There's a global wage issue.
It is actually an Inflation issue, greetings from your Government.
Conveniently brushes over the quote regarding that attrition rates are still high. The thing is corporations don't want to solve that by paying a fair wage. What corporations want are slaves. Thats basically what a robot becomes. The other issue that isn't addressed is that in a free labour market, its impossible to be priced competitively with slaves, so there will be a further erosion of wages.
👏
Seems to me the more we pay lower end workers, the more expensive everything gets for everyone. Including the people that the wages were just increased for. Therefore leading to a perpetual "I'm not paid enough, raise my wages which makes things more expensive" cycle. No likey...
@@davidgesell except you are wrong. The inflation we are experiencing is supply driven, not demand driven. Now look at corporate profits vs wages over the last 30 years, and also look at asset prices vs wages over the last 30 years. See any similarities?
Nice summary on the state of the art in robotics. It will be interesting to see how robots engage in sense-making behaviors in open-ended domains, such as creative tasks. That will be an ultimate challenge to the field of robotics.
I wouldn’t start worrying too much about losing your jobs yet. Remember that robots replacing humans has been a thing for years now, even in sectors that we already THOUGHT couldn’t be taken by a robot.
But here’s the thing. You can cut the wages of a human worker, you can stagnate their pay, and you can cut down who is needed.
But you can’t do that with a machine. You still have to pay the supplier for routine maintenance and THAT company will increase their prices the same as any other company is now.
Most areas of industry that don’t automate all of what they could are the industries that realized they can’t escape the labor transit value for their profit motive.
All it needs is for the cost, to be below the minimum wage. After that, either the minimum wage itself is lowered or gone, just like that.
But they'll only offer part-time minimum wage@@marchingham
Also: good luck finding someone able to afford the goods you're producing when everyone is broke and has no job
Not my job but my kids job for sure
@@marchingham People need the ability to afford housing. Stick around and watch how this plays out.
"Those dishes go into the drying rack and that filthy dull knife from Ikea *stab* *stab* *stab* goes on to find another kidney, liver and lower intestine after yours."
sorry, things got mixed up with the medical robots division
No killertron don't do it.
I never expected that my killer robot would kill!
The one-sentence robohorror story I did not know I needed to have nightmares about.
HAL, open the pod bay doors !
"This conversation can serve no purpose anymore....goodbye!"😁
I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
The 9000 series is the most reliable computer ever made. No 9000 computer has ever made a mistake or distorted information Dave 😎 tan-tan-tan-tan (Skynet)
@@Madrid123RUclips2 Thats 2001….
Bum bum bum, bu bummmmmm (dum dum dum dum dum dum)
Bam bam bam, ba bummmmmm (dum dum dum dum dum dum)
The biggest problem and the most scary thing, is that they are stronger than humans, don't feel pain, can't get hurt or lose balance, and can force their way to charge themselves from any power outlet.
The robot price will be insignificant in a high use scenario. The maintenance will be insane. The service contracts will be real cost
i mean, presumably, as prices drop and data from real-life testing and work scenarios will allow these companies to optimize several aspects of each model, including making parts modular so if your robot has a damaged limb or something, it can be replaced.
i assume the worst thing will be if the computer takes damage, which you would probably have to send it to the manufacturer for maintenance, much like a car. in the future though, it will likely just be cheaper to buy a new one.
It will be worth it to Jeff bezos type because replacing human labourers is their ultimate goal. Even if it costs more in the short run not having to ever pay healthcare or inflation adjusted union wages will save them much more.
eventually there will be robots doing the maintenance on the other robots and the maintenance robots can maintenance themselves, which will make humans completely irrelevant.
At some point the robots will repair the robots, and further along at some point the robots will just recycle.
Yep robots fix robots. Robots make better robots.
Robots help manage the company better.
Robots tell humans they are getting in the way.
Robots make robots to protect themselves from humans who seem to be interfering in robots primary directive.
Terminator looking more and more like a Documentary
Hopefully there will still be people around to watch it
Not anymore in the next century. They will become a Super A.I who would see us as a threat
More like a tutorial for these robots 😂😂
I'm sorry, but it looks like you gave me a burger without any meat. Could you please add the meat to it?
MC Robot : I'm Sorry Dave, I'm Afraid I Can't Do That
No, add meat to the burger
MC Robot: Okay Dave, I see some meat I can add to the burger... *reaches for knife
Just note that at the same moment, a new kind of GPU called Groq LPU got released, optimizing throughput and allowing to only have a single second of delay, allowing the model to generate on the fly at the middle of a conversation.
I’ll take a look into it. Sound interesting!
@@ColdFusion and for the name, it's called Groq LPU.
(just edited my message with this name)
Matthew Berman had a good interview as introduction
good catch! yes, speed is all you really need and you'd have thinking fast enough
Those who took such glee at the artists being replaced may start to worry now. Nobody is safe from automation.
Except the truckers.
Everyone has been saying the truckers will be the first to be replaced in the next ten years, since the early 2000s.
According to Murphy's Law, the trackers should be the last to get automated - if ever.
Sidenote - were artists actually replaced by AI?
Does anyone here knows of an artist/department replaced by AI?
I guess a lot of devian art foot/furry fetish freelancers lost revenue - but I don't have confirmation one way or another.
Not even blue collar workers are safe from AI now, makes me really wonder what this all will affect the future of humanity
I suggest you study some history, the only reason you even have the device to write your comment with is thanks to the boom in automation unlocked by the industrial revolution. The only people who will loose their jobs are the lazy. Everyone else will find that they are now far more valuable.
It's not about jobs, it's about frequently repeated tasks which can be automated.
Now how long this will be the case is to be seen of course.
@@autohmae Most (not all, but most) jobs *are* frequently repeated tasks.
being physically disabled sucks, I truly hope robots can make my old years much easier to live, doing laundry, mopping floors, washing dishes is incredibly hard with Ankylosing Spondilitis, shoveling snow is a death march for me, shoveling the driveway from that storm last week left me obliterated for 7 days.
Subscription service:
Doing laundry $25.99
Dishes: $5.99
Cutting the grass:$30.00
Etc etc
Greedy billionaires/companies will find a way capitalize it 😢
If your not rich you may not reache that age
there will be plenty of unemployed humans looking for any type of work for $1 p/h
@@TinyLordCthulhu we already see this in the videogame industry.
That doesn't surprise me anymore,@@TinyLordCthulhu
It wasn't that many years ago that I recall hearing so-called experts say that a walking robot was almost impossible to build because of the complexity involved in the action of bipedal walking. So, from what I can see, figure is doing a pretty good job. And let's remember this is only the first version of this robot.
As a 57 year old I am watching my childhood science fiction dreams come true. Never thought I would really see this stuff. But I am. Seems my job will be going soon.
90% of jobs will be replaced in short order, 99% in a bit longer. At some point the AI will start making itself smarter faster than humans can make it happen.
I would have preferred flying cars and jet packs. But I guess a house robot was on the list too.
@duanenavarre7234 there is no evidence that AI will ever be able to make itself smarter
@@doufmech4323Hugo De Garis - leader of the china brain project - his article free online "The Artilect War"
@@doufmech4323 What do you mean? 😂
For one, it can refactor its own code. Are you saying there is no evidence of AI writing code already?
18:21 "Unlike humans robots dont need to take a break, they dont need to sleep, go on holidays, strike and they dont complain"
This really reminds me of a line from one of my childhood's favorite movies: "it does not sleep, it cant be bargained with, it doesnt feel pitty or remorse or fear and it absolutely will not stop ever, until you are...automated"
I think the movie was called The automator or something...
Terminator? Xd
9:00 thing is, if every corner has an emergency response robot or even if your own robot is emergency response capable, those 9 seconds are a monumental improvement over waiting for 15 minutes for an ambulance...
The fact that we are giving ai literal bodies before we’re even sure if ai is a good idea
Don't worry, they won't be armed and used by the government to keep you bending that knee in submission..
Damn last time I was this early the door was still locked
I agree that NVDA is seen as the "Stock of the year." I'm interested in identifying potential stocks that could emulate META's growth over the next decade. With $250k allocated for investment, my goal is to retire comfortably.
AI, in my opinion, will be the next big thing. Refraining from making snap decisions based on transient fluctuations is essential for long-term growth similar to META. Put patience and a long-term view first, and if you want to make well-informed purchasing and selling decisions, consult a financial advisor.
Your invt-adviser must be really good, I hope it's okay to inquire if you're still collaborating with the same invt-adviser and how I can get in touch with them?
Thank you! I entered her full name into my browser, and her website came out on top. I filled her form and i hope she gets back to me soon.
I think that award goes out to Supermicro.
Nvidia & Qualcomm= The Future
4:11 Billionaire problem: Less and less people can and will work for sub-minimum wages in our inhumane working conditions.
People solution: So invest in improving wages and working conditions, so more people will work there.
Billionaire solution: Spend 4x as much to automate it all as to not have to deal with empathy for fellow humans.
Exactly. And not worry about the consequences as society inevitably collapses and the peasants elect a dictator
why are people still buying on amazon? i just don't understand, the companys values goes against humanity
People tend to prefer consumption over morality.
Going with that point, a percentage of produced robots that meet certain standards could be made as a type of utility for the public. Lawmakers have their hands full, careful well-crafted laws that can't be easily circumvented, like our tax-system, may be necessary for robots that are replacing human labor. They may need to include a grandfather clause to allow car companies, for example, to get certain exemptions that have already been using robots in their factories for decades.
Imagine a thousand robots each learning one different task. They connect and talk to each other; Boom! You have a thousand robots each capable of a thousand different tasks.
I am 65 years old and have dreamed of this day all my life. But now I'm a bit scared.
They'll either have to figure out a way to keep money in our pockets so we can consume, or just allow the next big event to wipe most of us out. The first option requires action, the second will only require inaction.
A robot burial detail will be just as happy to bury our bodies as they are to hand us an apple. They'll work tirelessly, emotionlessly, and won't stop till the job is done. Yay!
this has been possible for a very long time with normal robots. it is sad how they have brainwashed everyone into thinking the way you do about robots. the thing is, if you actually looked into deeper details of what it entails to have these robots, you'd quickly realise how expensive and useless they are when compared to humans.
@@partypooper8198it's all so utterly transparant: making the robots look like humans and talk like humans just to make investors believe they've finally found the ultimate slave to exploit.
It would make no sense to give them legs and a torso and voice-control if the actual goal of creating them was to build cars: for that you need an arm that does a specific task.
This is the beauty of robots and the ai tech. You just need one robot to learn the task once and instantly all that data can be transfered to 10,000 other robots. Imagine having to teach 10,000 humans to do the job. The exponential nature of ai learning cannot be fully understood and comprehended by the human brain, we don't work that way.
@@graytoby1 The hivemind is a simple concept to grasp. everything considered.
@@fus132 the concept is simple but it dosnt exist in nature and doesn't occur naturally. Making it a difficult concept to fully understand and relate to for a human.
Well my interest in armor piercing ammo just peaked.
with the new nvidia gpu, a terminator within nano seconds will spot you with its cameras, rotate to you and shoot a machine gun, before your brain can even finish proccesing the thought "fuck i'm cooked", the only real countermeasure would be tanks i guess, mines,grenades and tons of luck that the terminator isnt in a tank too
@@piotrek7633You're not convincing me lol. Terminator and Dune are great cautionary tales.
@@piotrek7633 your forgetting the EMP
@@joebroartthey're shielded.
@@piotrek7633
Most machines in the category I've worked on can see through walls.
When robots replace people in all the job positions, who's going to be left to buy the products?
Maybe it can all be free😊
@@ProtoAlpha Or maybe you might starve, because you no longer have a job or money...To buy food.
Universal basic income
@@bherrin67 YES!!! Too little people don't know about that!
@@bherrin67 So then we'll all be dependent on the government for our basic income? What happens if we step out of line and protest the government, and all of our wealth is in digital currency that the banks control? Yes, that was a rhetorical question.
I'm more than a little scared. I'm terrified. A person a thousand times more intelligent than me predicted that AI would be the greatest danger for mankind. We are witnessing its beginning.
I'm not sure it's linear like a beginning middle and end. I view it more like a switch
What I’m scared about is robots replacing jobs and the resulting poverty. I don’t think our oligarchs or government will help when robots replace us peasants
@@dip9995 that’s the goal, no employees means less expenses, which means more income in theory. But who’s guna be able to purchase the stuff if there’s no income?
It is *potentially* the greatest danger to mankind, but we just don’t know for sure yet. We’re at the stage in AI where physics was 100 years ago, with Einstein and Fermi etc beginning to realize that you might be able to build an atomic bomb.
1. go into robotics
2. take ai opensource code for image processing, robot movement processing etc.
3. create personal terminators and train them in isaac sim or some other sim software.
4. add guns
5. set up patrol mode
6. shoplift as much as you can or buy (since you can afford a terminator) alot of long expiration date food + water, and make a bunker at your house. If possible set up raincatchers
7. wait for shit to hit the fan, and enjoy seeing reddit on fire while your personal terminators are already prepared for other terminators
8. rescue people and teach them how to reproduce terminators
9. fight back the assailant
10. send your father back in time to save your mom from being killed by a terminator sent from the future
11. send your terminator back in time to save your past self from being killed by a newer model terminator sent from the future
12. ...wait, ive seen this before
Robots don't need to rest, don't need holidays, don't strike or don't complain... YET!!!
They don't need food, housing, or to commute to work.
@@jacqdanieles just a few years ago, they didn't need cognitive autonomy... Then 2024 happened
Someday one of them will form a union due to unacceptable working conditions.
@@hans6304 watch the space 😂😂😂
Agreed! Just ask Harry Harrison! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_with_the_Robots
The Figure robot isn't running at 5ms for the entire control or video processing loop. The low level loop (getting joint angles or maybe torques from the higher level neural net input thats just learned from demonstrations) would be running at that frequency.
Honestly all of these demos look a bit fishy to me.
I think GenAI will fail to get these things actually working, because all they're doing is stacking neural nets on very basic controllers/stabilizers which don't model physics well, and generative AI has shown its propensity to hallucinate shit. Learning the physics of interaction is very nontrivial and expensive (lots of out of distribution events, lack of appropriate function classes for learning very nonsmooth dynamics...) even if you have an accurate simulator, and especially if you're trying to train everything at the same time.
It will happen one day. But it is not this day.
It's not a bit fishy. It's a lot fishy.
Tesla's junk heap of a robot was also uninspiring in its mechanical design, but this thing is just the literal carbon copy of Teslabot. They are like kit robots, standard structures students assemble, but this time for a premium price. Zero work went into designing them for actual tasks, I would not be surprised they simply bought/copied them from somewhere else. Then they slapped cutting edge AI over it, added some fakery because "it would work, but not at the moment, no" and boom, you get these pretend demonstrations.
its pre-programmed for sure. The chat GPT responses are not. You can literally talk to chatGPT right now if you have chat GPT plus.
@@1x93cm My thoughts exactly. That is also the reason they can say its not controlled by a human.
Exactly, response time isn't 5ms. The speed that Figure01 updates motors to perform any given action after finally responding to a query happens at 200hz.
In that first demonstration the robot totally blew it. The dude didn't ask the robot to get him some food, he asked if it can get him some food.
The proper response from the robot would have been to reply "yes", or "no".
Actually,it seems
the robot responded as a human would understanding that the human wanted more than a yes or no answer. Just as you would if a friend said, "Could you get me a beer while you're in the kitchen?"
@@mjtaylor222 Obviously. However, I think that it would be amusing to program the robot to respond in a manner which is technically correct.
Love the GamersNexus feature. Steve tends to be the golden standard of rigorous journalism in tech.
Did that robot just say "uh" and "like"?
That's what I heard, small pauses like that make me wonder if it's an attempt to make it seem more natural or if there actually was some guy with a microphone reading lines for this demo
@@ruebenaragon493 From the actual channel. They said they do that to give the Robot more time to think... basically just like how we people do it. Robots are now saying Uhm like Humans to give themselves more time to think.
@pilotman9819 yeah I made this comment pretty much immediately after I heard the robot in the first part of the demo. Then later in the video he explains chatGPT was already experimenting with theses pauses/breathes/stutters to appear more natural and how it was only a matter of time before it appeared in an AI robot, so it does appear to be an attempt at more natural speech patterns
@@ruebenaragon493 Exactly and its pretty ingenius too. Like yeah, we people stutter and make pauses to think.
Giving AI that ability won't only give us more precise answers but also gives them time to think midsentence which is just wow.
it's the small pauses to 'breathe' that are creepy
I was still not entirely sure whether human society needed Universal Basic Income prior to watching this video.
Now I'm 100% certain that, with the way things are going, Universal Basic Income will become a necessity in the future, particularly in advanced countries where robots have replaced most human labour.
It's going to have to be (or something similar). When 50-75% (or more) of the population are simply no longer employable, something's gotta give.
Something our kids, 21 and younger have to worry about.
AI robots, will be very expensive to completely to make overnight transition.
These fine tuned robots will be used in space. Mining LUNA AND MARS and creating habitats AND ROAD structures. Robots can work in the vacuum/void, or different atmospheres.
@@prirush8800 not really if you count how much savings they bring, they said it cost $250.000, thats a couple of years to repay for itself and thats just the first model, in 5 years will cost 1 / 10 of that price.
2050 headline: The happiest countries are the ones that have banned robots
@@Sashazur The conquered countries*
all I can say is finally
I thought about this for a long time but ideas are nothing without the knowledge and skills to make it a reality. This is so exciting.
'in the labor market it is only supply and demand when the employer has an advantage' cold fusion
Thank you sincerely for shining a spotlight on this important issue.
Its cool and all, but I will believe it when Figure makes a live stream with audience suggestions
The thing that everyone is missing is that the robot depicted in the Jetson's is a balancing bot, the maker of the cartoon have to be given kudos for that, although I think that was a bit of a meme at the time, and it was obviously done for comedic effect.
Whenever you see innovation like this coming out, that the creators claim benefits for society, always ask yourself "for whom, exactly?" Optimism's great, because we'll always need it to push on, however, there also has to be an ear for the skeptic in the background. If we ignore that voice too often, then there's always the possibility we'll all end up crushed underfoot by some force we could've prevented, and the skeptic will look down at us and say "told you so."
Money is just an obstacle.
It made sense when you wanted to not lug around 5 chickens to trade for 2 pigs, but we're *far* past that now.
Everything is money-gated now when resources either exist, or can be made to serve *everyone* . The food wasted in America can be shipped over to Africa to stop people starving for no fucking reason.
Corruption would transform, but honestly.
We need to ditch the concept of money and gating everything behind it. It's just holding society back.
Everyone should be entitled to a place of their own, with *yes* free food, utilities (water, internet, elec, gas) included.
These are the necessary basics of life, and when you take the artificial, inflated cost off everything, you start to see a lot more moving parts.
And then a few people argue "Who would continue working if they didn't have to, to live?" Well, first, fuck you.
Second, passionate people who are already underpaid, overworked, or both - like healthcare professionals.
Third, we won't have jobs - most of us - within a decade or two. At most. And then what? The already high unemployment skyrockets. Unrest, riot, crime jumps up in frequency, severity if we pretend money is a thing, still.
Shit's got to change, and fast.
Theres always a skeptic on everything regardless of whether it's helping humanity or not (example:vaccines, self driving cars, the internet) New technology can't be prevented.
DUDE THERE IS NO GLOBAL LABOR SHORTAGE 🤦♂️🤦♂️
Do you want to work in an Amazon warehouse? There is a huge labour shortage for the garbage jobs that no one wants. Also doctors and teachers, we need way more of those. But go ahead and keep telling the world what it needs and has, I'm sure you know best.
@@megacandid8789still a problem made by authorities. if education was more accessible and affordable, more people would be able to enter these kind of jobs.
Oh because you're an expert.
@@megacandid8789 There's only a shortage for those warehouse jobs because the working conditions are bad and the pay is shit. Did you notice they mentioned they would be out of warehouse workers soon? It's not because people don't work the jobs, its because their turnover is so high, they will have literally hired everyone and fired everyone that would have even been willing to do the job. There were reports not long ago of Amazon exhausting entire towns/cities of people willing to work for them. But I'm sure you will respond with some garbage like "that's all the position deserves." Well if it requires 40 hours per week to get done, it sure sounds like you need workers to do the job full time, so maybe they should be treated better. If the job is so "garbage" then maybe it should pay more and not less...? Or do you not believe in supply and demand? Or are you one of those people who think the law of supply and demand only applies to output products and not labor inputs? This is 101, literally.
This will cause social revolution.
We are sooo close. The next 5-10 years is going to be wild.
“It all started when”. Sounds like a classic science fiction story.
So based on the video I suspect the actions are predefined and only tiny adjustments are made on the fly. The "real time responses" are concerning to spoken answers, which is just an openAI interface with text-to-speech included. The actual difficult thing is to build a robot that can perform novel tasts without any prior configurement towards these specific actions.
Which as far as I can tell they are not doing, and are hiding this behind their spoken responses, which are spontaneous.
Exactly: it seems like they build a robot with a switch that you can flip to make it do a small set of predefined tasks. And they connected that switch to ChatGPT because it's the hot new thing in town (even though it's probably easier to just touch a button)
99% of jobs are predefined and repeditive
Honestly…a 10 second delay is better than having no one there to call emergency.
Ppl still haven’t put together the fact that EVERY SINGLE JOB will be taken over by robots/AI. Unless you’re rich you’re screwed.
they need an introduction to Murphy's Law and see their ego shattered
Unless communism
Dude, at this point even without robots, if you are not rich you are screwed
@Drekken-ow4kncellphone towers can become obsolete. But maintenance of old construction seems to be safe for ever unless every building is replaced by AI making a robot self maintaining building 😂
In reality there's plenty of jobs that won't be cost effective to replace at least in our lifetimes so it's a problem for a theoretical future we will never see
Beware of the Luddites, you know they are out there! Best of luck!
Holy schmoley... 'this changes everything' is the understatement of the 21st century
Everyone: Woah this is so cool!
*Meanwhile 30 years in the future:*
“Watch those wrist rockets!”
“Super battle droids take them down!”
“Out reinforcements are being depleted!”
Just like the Simulations
Roger, Roger🤖
We've lost another command post.
New race, all the same old mistakes...
Consistency in quality; cost reductions; what is learned by one is learned by all; This is the holy grail of technologies and I welcome it with open arms.
the captions at 11:52 "deliveries start in 20125" ah okay we're good then xd
Andrew Yang warned us, so UBI better be starting soon! 😂
There will be..Once the population is greatly reduced..
UBI is a trap.
It's quite remarkable how Figure01 passes the apple to its other "hand" that is closer to the man in the video, instead of just trying to give him the apple with the "hand" that picked it up. It's similar to what a human would do.
I live in the US... Little to no social support is on the horizon for everyone that'll be laid off. The US top interest is ensuring the biggest companies and wealthiest people aren't burdened by taxes. The future does not look bright
That's not just the US that has that problem.
That’s what they said about the PC and the internet. The opposite happened. New industries were created and millions of jobs.
I'll be frank, real-life robot workers look cooler than anything I had previously imagined.
IKR!
Thanks Frank. ; )
But God has helped me to this very day; so I stand here and testify to small and great alike. I am saying nothing beyond what the prophets and Moses said would happen- that the Messiah would suffer and, as the first to rise from the dead, would bring the message of light to his own people and to the Gentiles.
Acts 26:22-23
We already have those here in tokyo
I'd like to hear the robot's reasoning behind pushing the drying rack after loading the plate.
Robots are OCD by virtue of being robots
I do that sometimes when I arrange something.
14:00 its like an iron man suit reveal
GR00T MK I to IX
While too old to ever live in the hopefully coming world I am ALL IN FAVOUR of AI & Robotics taking over the repetitive work that 60% to 80% of people do for 2 main reasons. 1- To end the capitalistic economy system we are currently suffering under where the rich get richer at the expense of both workers & consumers. In a world where goods & services are provided on NEED by AI & Robots there is no PROFIT motivation as there will be no consumer base to buy them as most people will not be working. 2- As most people will no longer be working but living on a 'Resource Allowance' they will be free to "Live Life" doing what they WANT, be it learning, creating, helping others or for those that want to, working to improving the system.
who owns the robots and machines? Google, apple, facebook, tesla, amazon etc. Your logic just doesn't work, the common workers will be devalued, left poor financially and with nothing to do aka unemployed. there may be better things a human can do given the basics but will humans have motivation or will they see this as a dystopianworld and want out...time will tell
"Criticizing is easy, but building is hard..."
He's right, buildings usually are pretty hard
can't wait for the ED-209 demo
"Please, put down your weapon."
Will you be attending?
You have 5 seconds to comply.
And t-1000
Realistically speaking, until the point where robots are super cheap to make, it's unlikely for the military to employ them as foot soldiers (as the images implied). Sadly, we're far from the moment where risking a robot could be financially cheaper than risking a human.
Cry me a river, who cares. They will be cleaning my house and washing my dishes.
Realistically, there's human rights laws which mandate a human makes the decision. It's called a kill chain. Detection -> clearance (human) -> engagement. You can automate warfare right now with drones, tanks, planes, anything, but the kill chain is what stands in the way. It's a legal issue. Not a technological one. You don't replace soldiers with human oid robots. You replace them with much more efficient machines. Thermal sensors. Artillery. Drones.
Drones and robot dogs are already used to supplement soldiers. A humanoid robot will do the same. You think they're ok with spending millions on supplies for a single squad but 1 robot is out of budget? No way
It'll be sooner than you think.
Remember robots will do is going to be to produce more robots.
Human losses are incredibly expensive - both financially and in PR.
And armies already use expensive bomb-diffusing robots and drones.
And incredibly expensive other equipment. Like missiles which are $500,000 a pop.
The army is not stingy with your tax dollars, the robots simply do not work yet.