If there are many such beings, then none of them are "ultimate." This would be logically the same as saying that a maximally great being does not possibly exist. This is a much stronger claim (one more difficult to defend) than the claim in the argument, which is merely that it is possible that a maximally great being exists. - RF Admin
@@686dar //同樣的,如果只有一個終極存在,就不會有無量的終極存在。// Why think that? It seems true that if there is a maximally great being, then only one ultimate being exists. - RF Admin
00:02:11 哲學家科安認為「全能悖論」告訴我們上帝「不可能是全能」的。全能是矛盾的。
依照「全能悖論」:『如果任一個體是「全能」的話,那麼他就一定能夠制訂出一個他不能履行的工作,如此他就不會是全能的;反之,若一個「全能」的個體不能夠制訂出一個他不能履行的工作,如此他也不會是全能的。因此,無論他能否制訂這項工作,他都不會是全能的。』。
这个解释清晰明了!
結婚單身漢,還是單身,卻有結婚,還被見證祝福,結婚證書是單身漢,哇,魔術師,這個世界什麼事都存在各種可能,拍手叫好,祝福結婚單身漢結婚。現實也要幸福快樂喔~
意识学无法被用科学和逻辑的“分约法”来无限拆分到最小来研究。逻辑本身受限于我们现实世界,时间空间等规则,因此“上帝”无法被一个“门”里的规则被推演和解释得完整和清晰。我们的现实世界只能看到一小部分的上帝,还是具有局限性。
如果本來就有多個,甚至無限多個終極存在可能存在,那麼就不存在唯一的終極存在。
If there are many such beings, then none of them are "ultimate." This would be logically the same as saying that a maximally great being does not possibly exist. This is a much stronger claim (one more difficult to defend) than the claim in the argument, which is merely that it is possible that a maximally great being exists. - RF Admin
@@DrCraigInternational同樣的,如果只有一個終極存在,就不會有無量的終極存在。
然而,目前這兩種說法都是被衆人承認的。
甚至在某些宗教,這兩種想法在不同視角下,被同時使用。
@@686dar //同樣的,如果只有一個終極存在,就不會有無量的終極存在。//
Why think that? It seems true that if there is a maximally great being, then only one ultimate being exists. - RF Admin
@@DrCraigInternational 無論如何!誰也不能證明終極存在,若有,沒人能讓神感到意外。
可是神完全可能是超越逻辑的
神如果超越邏輯,那麼神就不會出現!
邏輯是形式科學,有明確定義。如果說邏輯可以被超越,那就好像是在說「1+1等於2,而且1+1不等於2,兩者同時成立」,上帝要怎麼讓 1+1 同時等於 2 又同時不等於 2 ??