Mu'tazili 3 - The Khwaraji Fanatics
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 фев 2025
- To understand Mu'tazali thought it is important to know the debates occurring at the time. The Mu'tazali wanted to find a middle road between the Khwaraji and the Murjite views.
*English RUclips: / taimurrahman1975
*Instagram: / taimur_laal
*Twitter: / taimur_laal
An important part of an important subject. Thanks very much sir !
U r great sir i listen all your lecture
God bless u
Watching this series back to back, very engaging
Learning so much from you sir.
after so manay years today after lisning your lecture i came to understand actual thinking of mutazila .
Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩❤
We are blessed to have a person like you in Pakistan. I don't agree with all of your point of views but the good thing is that you explain all the things in a very eloquent and easy manner. This series was much needed as regarding these things, we get the biased knowledge and opinion about it if you ask it from any respective sect...
By the way, he is not giving his views, he is putting forward political history, views are by the people watching and learning through this discourse.
ماشاءاللہ بہت زبردست معلومات فراہم کی ہیں آپ نے۔ براہِ مہربانی مزید تاریخ کے ان حقائق سے ہمیں آگاہ کرتے رہیں۔ شکریہ ۔
Thank you so much
I appreciate how easily you dispense the knowledge. Also im surprised of your ability to explain complex concepts ans historical events so easily that a Jahil like me can also benefit from it. Gratefulness and appreciation 🎉
Thank you so much Sir for providing us with the valueable content 🎉
Nice Sir 👍
❤ تیمور رحمان صاحب ❤ بہت اعلی❤
অসাধারণ তথ্য সমৃদ্ধ বর্ণনা স্যার।
আপনার কথা শোনার জন্য অপেক্ষায় থাকি।
❤🇧🇩
Is topic ko itni detail main kisi ne nai cover kara. Jazakallah khair
Allah Pak aap k kaam mein barkat day... murshad
Thanks a lot for enlightening us: stay blessed
thank u for doing this Dr. Taimur
Laal Sb
Zindabaad
Keep nurturing us..never let it go, thanks again
سرکار آپ کا انتہائی مشکور کہ آپ نے ایک اعلیٰ مضمون چُنا اور ہم سب کو سیراب کر رہے ہیں۔
MASHA ALLAH great work dr. sb.
Thanks you sir i learn alot from you . Our university need sir like you.
You might have done too much hard work on this topic of mu'tazilah.. it is a big academic and researched work,,,,, no doubt. May Allah bless upon you.
Waiting for more such videos. This will make easy for us to understand Muslim philosophy.
Sir bhrreen best and very informative video waiting for next time
🌹👍💯 زبردست 💯👍🌹
Thank God Dr Timur is fast coming out of this sensitive phase of great Arabian History
Love your efforts and Muhammad Mirza Ali engineer ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Great work: waiting for next sir❤
❤❤❤ can wait ... for next blog taimur bahi
Boht shukriya for great information
Beautiful
Excellent sir
Dear Taimur, I give you 💯 not for what is said but to create an amazing interest in Islamic political history. 😊 if topic would have been simply, Islamic school of thoughts this may not have attracted many
wow sir finally long awaited episode uploaded.
Was eagerly waiting for this.
Sallam sir aj apki video sb se pehly mene dekhy😊 ha bohot a6a conclusion sir great respect ❤❤❤
Good work
Very impressive
Taimur sb apki videos se hum ne bohot kuch seekha hy aur apko follow karte han, female sahabia ya ummahat ul mominin yani hazrat ayesha ke name ke saath anhaa lagaya karen with alif and male sahabas ke saath anho yani vow lagaya karen. Thanks a lot for your videos and lectures . We're grateful sir
love the series sir...
Great series , hope to add more information before reaching to Mutazlai.
It's like saying " closing the history in a bottle "
very informative and rational
Sir you are the diamond 💎
Bless you❤
Good approach. I hope you'll explain other philosophies with the same approach.
This content is actually very good.
Thanks a lot❤
awsome comrade keep it up ....
i agree with khwarij point of view of Khilafah. That any upright Muslim can be Khilafah of Muslims.(pious, knowledge of fiqah, knowledge of military)
Bhai sirf aik pehlu pe aap faisla nhi krsakte. Khawarij qitaal krte the. Robberies krte the. Takfir krte the. Muslamano ki jaan maal apne pe halal samajte the. So. They were more like ISIS of today.
Isis bhi kehte hn k hamari larai islam ki larai hai. Doesn't make them right
This is the reason why sunnis are accepting every tom dick and harry from the CIA as their caliph.😅
@@Danishnawaz5inki sabse soft form deobandi hain jo aajkal puri ummat ko gumrah kar rahe hain.
Fascinating
Super
Mza agya sir g
Sir please pronounce Hazrat Ayesha R.A Anha instaed anho coz anho is used with males and anha with females. BTW sensational approach towards history ❤ I learned a lot from your lectures on philosophy and history. Stay blessed❤
9:37 Hazrat Ali also wanted to continue the war with Damascus forces as he was winning the war but majority of his forces were from kufah, whose people tried to stop him from further confrontation.
Jazak Allah 9:37
بہت شاندار
Earnestly wait for your video
love you💌💌
Sir g sunay begirat he like ker diya😁
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
I am enjoying your vlogs
بے شک میں نے آج بہت کھچ سیکھا ۔
Bring more Muslim Rational philosophers in the light. So that every Muslim can be rational. 🤝👌
As long as anyone reveres that 7th century suicidal warlord, slaver and child rapist they are forever precluded from being "rational!"
I wish the same for QAR and Sahil Alim.Well at least we have Engineer.
@@uzone8571 what do u think is special in Engineer
@@I6eeikahdu38 At least he has highlighted some serious stuff regarding clerics. These sick people have defended the fake Kamila of chisti their debate.
Well philosophically there's is no room for any religion's I am talking about western philosopher who devoleps today's philosophical ideas or thought or logic western philosopher did their work from Greek and Roman languages in short they read and understand the Greek and Roman philosopher very carefully
very very intelligent person
Present Sir
well done
Imam Ali and his loyal companions were against the arbitration offer by Muawyyia because they knew that it was a clever tactic by the son of Abu Sufyan to avoid the apparent defeat. But khwarijites refused to fight,as a result son of Abu sufyan survived and hence that was the when Islam started to decline…
بڑا مزہ آیا محبوب امید قوی ھے کہ معلومات سے سیر کرتے رھین گے
میری کچھی پھیکی ادرو کو درگذر کرین دوست
عائشہ رضی اللہ عنہا ہے اور علی رضی اللہ عنہ ہوتا ہے ڈاکٹر صاحب۔
جزاک اللہ
Yes. My mistake. Thanks for correction.
@@Taimur_Laal No problem dr sahib.we all are students .
معاملات قیامت تک معاشی ہی رہیں گے اسی لیے اللہ نے پہلی آیت میں ہی اپنا تعارف رب العالمین کہہ کر کروایا ہے یعنی جہانوں کو پالنے والا یا روزی دینے والا یا نشونما دینے والا یا گارجین۔
you're actually good
❤
❤❤❤
We also believe that politcal leadership of a community should not be restricted to a particular tribe or clan. So, have we same thoughts as Khwarij?
I think Islam also says the same
Bhtreen!! Sir ..
Magr sir kiya Murjiyaaa kharjiyoo ki hi development nhi zara naram aqiad k sth?
Sir❤
Dr.Sahib May I request to record a series on All Shai sects
02:45 Collective Property Vs Individual Property
*کیا ہم یہ مطلب اخذ کر سکتے کہ خاتم الأنبیاء ﷺ کی بدولت جب کُھلا مالِ غنیمت آیا تو صحابہ آپس میں ٹکر و ٹکری ہو گئے؟*
Sadly.
Dr sab very good effort, but you need to understand Shai concept as well. So that a fair understanding can b developed regarding history plz
Mr. Rahman... Give reference to books that prove your videos authentic and also people can get a way of reading....
Good suggestion.
Thanks for your wonderful contribution to education. May I suggest just one correction here: “Anhu” is for male and female”AnhA” is for female. So, Hazrat Ayesha will be Razi Allah Taala AnhA, not AnhU.
Sirji please make a Video on IBN RUSHD and he's secularism 🤝🙏❤
Salaam. Sir how can I contact you. I need some guideline regarding phd in political science. I am from Karachi
Please convert your lectures in book form. It will help us to understand in more clarity than lectures.
He is himself quoting from Books of others. On this topic please refer to خلافت و ملوکیت
@@waqarahmad1833 It seems you have not gone through the mentioned book written by Maulana Maududi. Lecture was based on information collected from different books in speaker words.
@@mahalam2391 then what will be the purpose of another book from a lecture which already is a reference from some books? Even the information he is sharing is incomplete and such matter is the one نیم حکیم خطرہ جان
@@waqarahmad1833 from new book. We will get reference of different books. Also all details will be in written form . I can re read the books later on. Further any body after some times can go through the details regarding different groups of that time. I hope it is clear now.
@@waqarahmad1833 to my mind reading book is more useful than listening lectures.
Vedio duration should be minimum one hour.
These numbers are exaggerated and that's an understatement.
Could be but these are the numbers stated by Muslim historians closest to that period.
❤️👌
*We read in about 50 ancient books of Sunni sect that in last sermon; Prophet said: even if a maimed black slave is made your Ruler and he holds fast to Book of Allah Azza wa Jal; then listen him and obey him. And you have told in this video that those people who are labeled by Sect-Followers as "Khawarij", also said same what Rasool said in last sermon*
Qaramatein ke bare me btaye..ye log to kafi advanced the...socialism democracy ko follow karte the .
Did in Jang e Saffin.... Mawaya put Quran on sword to force Hazart Ali's Army to stop fight..... To avoid defeat????
That is what historians tell us.
I call upon you directly to respond to this.in "after the prophet" book written by Lesley Hazelton
It says about in the battle of siffin it was not HAZRAT ALI RA who came to an agreement with himself rather the Kwarijites who told Ali Ra to to come to agreement with Muyaawiya
It would be great if you give some sort of reference or proof about the different narration you told in your video.
Also some proof or reference about Kwarijites later development to become ibadi
عائشہ عنھا
شیعہ اہلیبت کو خلافت کا حقدار سمجھتے تھے لیکن اسکی وجہ خاندان کا فرد ہونا نہیں ہے بلکہ وہ اہلیبت میں سے صرف ان افراد کو حقدار سمجھتے تھے جو اللّٰہ کی جانب سے امام مقرر کیے گئے تھے اور انکی تعداد بھی آخری نبی (ص) مقرر فرما گئے تھے۔ بہت سے اہل سنت بھی ان 12 اماموں کو تسلیم بھی کرتے ہیں لیکن اہلسنت امامت اور خلافت کو مجتمع نہیں سمجھتے۔ میرا مقصد صرف اس پہلو کی طرف آپ کو متوجہ کرنا ہے۔
Professor I think you missed alot of nuance when retelling early islamic history especially the events that the contended between the two major sects of Islam. It is always better to mention opposing historical view points rather than implying that a specific version of history is the only credible one worthy of mention.
The part you are referring to is impossible to tell because of polarisation within Muslims. Someone or the other will always feel that it’s not the truth.
You just glossed over hazrat usman's role in reaching to this point. Like his nepotism in granting lands and titles to his own clan and not being the just ruler he was supposed to be.
It is mentioned.
Sir females ko jung ki permission nii hy to phir Hazrat Ayesha r.a ny ya jung ki...
Kindly iss prr roshni daalyn
Agar dakha jaey TU khawarji point of view was modern at that time,aur apni jaga Sahi BHI thaa.
معذرت کے ساتھ ڈاکٹر صاحب ، ثالثی کی پیشکش حضرت علی نے نہیں بلکہ حضرت معاویہ کے لوگوں نے کی تھی۔
Yes of course. But many in Hazrat Ali’s troops wanted him to go into arbitration.
Sir these quraish families actually was bannu ummiyad
Abu Bakr was from the Banu Taym tribe of the Quraysh tribal confederacy. Ummayad's accepted his Khilafat.
@@Taimur_Laal sir actually the conflict between bannu Hashim and bannu ummiyad was too old before Islam which lead the battle between prophet and Abu sufiyan, battle between hazrat Ali and mawiyah bin sufiyan and finally the battle of Karbala. And you know it.
@@Taimur_Laal the reason behind the acceptance of hazrat Abu bakar khalifat was at that time ummayad was very weak at that time but during hazrat Osman era they got power again and they were the governor's of the most important provinces.
@@KhawarAbbas-mm2sc hmmm 🤔 I’m not entirely in agreement with that.
@@Taimur_Laal sir you have a right to have a different opinion.