McCulloch v Maryland

McCulloch v. Maryland. Produced by the Robert H. Smith Center for the Constitution at James Madison's Montpelier. Featuring:
* Josh Chafetz - Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
* Risa Goluboff - John Allan Love Professor of Law and Professor of History, University of Virginia Law School
* Nelson Lund - University Professor, George Mason University School of Law.
This video was originally produced as part of "The Federal Judiciary: From Idea to Institution" online course produced by the Center for the Constitution. For more information on online courses by the Center for the Constitution, please direct your browser to the following address/URL: www.montpelier.org/courses

[@ihameed]

here from wgu course, anyone else?

[@ZEEN100]

Yes

[@jacob4189]

Yeet

[@dallascase5283]

Yes

[@wupeide]

You are a great teacher!!!!

[@r.ginarenee-hbhaenglishdep2635]

FANTASTIC VIDEO!

[@MG-jv7pe]

excellent video! thanks for posting!

[@dannylatino2]

So helpful, thanks a lot!

[@DissentOrConcur]

Abolish the federal reserve.

[@zethschatz28]

Good video.

[@jimmyhoover5726]

Is the Fed not a national bank?

[@kozmosnotgay]

Jimmy Hoover not necessarily. The fed is a non-centralized, meaning, it is not a part of the central government. A-political. Plus, its job is not the same as the banks in the past. It does not hold national debt like the original national banks (the us treasury, and the bureau of public debt hold national debt). What the fed does do, similarly to the old national banks is Control monetary supply. They print the dollars and choose how much to print. But beyond that, the fed also controls monetary policy by controlling the national interest rate. So, really, the only thing the fed does that classifies it as a "national bank" based on the old interpretation of a national bank, is that it prints money.

[@DissentOrConcur]

@@kozmosnotgay prints money to create inflation.

[@jameszeris5418]

Federal reserve private bank