Serendipity.Excellent explanation of Life Cycle of A Case in The American Legal System. Short and in sharp focus, Dispute Resolution Under Law. Plaintiff Vs. Defendant. "All Litigants Are Created Equal Under The Laws", of A given State. I am a Common Law jurisdiction Attorney and had a Worm View of Litigant's Rights. Thanks, professor Toby Heytens for sharing Bird's eye view of a client's case from inception to Disposition. Why Go to Trial, Sue and then settle at the Court Steps.
Taking my LSAT soon, and wanted to see some actual school material so I can get a glimpse of what’s in store. Would’ve appreciated the PowerPoint but nonetheless, I’m glad this was published for us to watch
You explained Claim preclusion and Issue preclusion in a way I can really remember. I see the Courts need all of the facts and law in both the Civil Complaint and in Criminal Indictments. Makes sense; "why didn't I hear about this before" and "I've already decided it."
I have been practising law for more than 10 years in my home country and watched this presentation due to curiosity. Court system in the USA makes no sense whatsoever...
Isn’t the legal system simply a piece of paper and that has to do with legal rights? If it’s not about morals and ethics then how can it be based on truth? This seems irrational. A piece of paper can’t use logic and identify things in objective reality.
3:36 The very essence of law comes from the people, which are the only real substantial living beings that government and law derive its very essence from. Every law has to be in pursuance to the constitution. Period! Fictions of reality are not sovereign, nor are they alive. The American people are the true sovereigns, not the state nor federal.
Jesus just has merely two hands, however he could deal with omnipresent hidden frauds and betrayals in his holistic panoramic views! Lord of Universal Hierarchy might help.
wish we were able to see the powerpoint smh
Serendipity.Excellent explanation of Life Cycle of A Case in The American Legal System. Short and in sharp focus, Dispute Resolution Under Law. Plaintiff Vs. Defendant. "All Litigants Are Created Equal Under The Laws", of A given State. I am a Common Law jurisdiction Attorney and had a Worm View of Litigant's Rights. Thanks, professor Toby Heytens for sharing Bird's eye view of a client's case from inception to Disposition. Why Go to Trial, Sue and then settle at the Court Steps.
Taking my LSAT soon, and wanted to see some actual school material so I can get a glimpse of what’s in store. Would’ve appreciated the PowerPoint but nonetheless, I’m glad this was published for us to watch
Absolutely one of the best Law School RUclips channels out there. They post quality law school content.
You can tell he is passionate about what he does! Love it.
Please zoom out to include the visual portion of the presentation (presumably, the slideshow).
Beautiful lecture...great orator as well. Thank you professor/counsel/wonderful human being...🙂
This was simply wonderful. Thank you for uploading this gem!
So glad the Honorable Heytens, USCAJ, made the brave decision to come out as gay BEFORE his confirmation hearing. Thank you sir!
So much good information. Will have to watch several times. Thanks!
Would have loved to have seen the PowerPoint but great video overall.
Thanks for the free info! Truly appreciate it.
Oh. God. i like this teacher so much!!!
Great explanation with heavily exeperience on law and the state of America
You explained Claim preclusion and Issue preclusion in a way I can really remember. I see the Courts need all of the facts and law in both the Civil Complaint and in Criminal Indictments. Makes sense; "why didn't I hear about this before" and "I've already decided it."
I pray that I get to take a class by him.
I have been practising law for more than 10 years in my home country and watched this presentation due to curiosity. Court system in the USA makes no sense whatsoever...
Hope to study JD in UVA very soon!!!
such an incredible overview. i learned so much
Many thanks, Professor!
Really insightful video!
It would have been better if the camera would focus on the slides than on him, even though he was an important speaker. Thanks for the lecture.
Great video. Thank you 🤗
Nailed it! Thank you
Great lecture! I enjoyed it very much.
Wouldn't it be nice if the courts spoke in this simple common language?
Awesome instructor!!
Don't forget 'Family Court'. Doesn't have due process. So called 'Administrative Court'.
Excellent job!!!!
Good overview.?
Great!! Thanks. Nailed the presentation
Thank you
Good lecture
This man reminds me of the entertainment lawyer from Gossip Girl.
🔥
Isn’t the legal system simply a piece of paper and that has to do with legal rights? If it’s not about morals and ethics then how can it be based on truth? This seems irrational. A piece of paper can’t use logic and identify things in objective reality.
3:36 The very essence of law comes from the people, which are the only real substantial living beings that government and law derive its very essence from. Every law has to be in pursuance to the constitution. Period! Fictions of reality are not sovereign, nor are they alive. The American people are the true sovereigns, not the state nor federal.
Judges essentially supersede ALL law, with no accountability for harming people.
Texas stands mostly on The Constitution.
So everybody still has to start off by saying the word "So." Just like Alicia Silverstone in Clueless. In 1995? Why? Please stop now.
Jesus just has merely two hands, however he could deal with omnipresent hidden frauds and betrayals in his holistic panoramic views! Lord of Universal Hierarchy might help.