So are you as impressed with the improvements and results as I am? Have you been able to try it yourself? How was the outcome? Have any especially impressive results? Post a link and let us know in the comments! Thanks for watching and leave us a like and subscribe if you learned something that you maybe haven't seen elsewhere. 😉
I have the same problem, I read somewhere that if your Mac isn't running with Apple Silicon then this particular feature wont be available. I have an intel chip so that makes sense for me.
Sorry, I was never notified of your comment! You may have already figured out the issue, but if not, I can only assume that you either don't have an Apple Silicon Mac, as I point out in the video as being a requirement, OR you don't have at least macOS *_Ventura_* v13.5 installed. Or BOTH? Otherwise, I can't of a reason why it wouldn't show up. Hope that helps!
Any time! And funny enough, I literally had taken that part back out at one point thinking it was too long and "Surely everyone knows about this already…" 😄 Very happy to hear that it didn't go unnoticed! Cheers!
The new Smooth Slow Mo feature is amazing, super fast compared with Topaz/Apollo while more or less same quality, in my test, Topaz sometimes better, sometimes FC better, so very similar! Cant wait for them to add a proper Dnoise AI and Upscaling AI tools!!
I apprecitae your video but none of the clips you used this feature on are usable with commercial client work. Maybe fine for hobby videos but after my own experiments with this feature in FCPX i can def say the tech is not there yet and def not ready for prime time.
Being on RUclips, I am very limited in the material that I can use. In other words, I can't use any of my "commercial" material for copyright reasons. But then I have no idea what qualifies a clip as being "commercial" anyway. If the results are not usable for you, then I can only assume that the footage is just plain unsuited to begin with, or you simply went way overboard. No one claims this to be a magic bullet for _any in every_ type of footage. Obviously, there will always be shots that will suffer, especially if you overdo it. But I'd love to know which alternatives _* are_* "ready for prime time" in your opinion, and I can gladly do a comparison. Because I don't know of any that get anywhere close. At least none that are effectively FREE. I have yet to get results that were completely unusable.
SUGGESTION: First thank you for this video its very informative and much needed... kudos to you... I do have one suggestion, It seems like you have color graded your videos.. and the desktop/final cut pro window when you are showing us the software its so dark... for a minute I thought it was my monitor and and had to compare it to others... and yes your videos are much darker... please consider not dimming the screen you are showing as this is why people are watching your videos... thanks again for the great content... here another video for comparison how bright it is.. ruclips.net/video/lC5qQWyTuZ0/видео.html
Hey, thanks for the feedback! I believe the issue is that the clips are *HDR* and the RUclips conversion is somehow dimming them down, because the originals are as they should be (at 75%). Watching them in HDR should be fine. I'll probably have to switch to using 100% HDR luminance rage from now on, which I don't usually like to do. Oh well. Thanks for watching!
@@postpros-e That would explain why the screens are DIM.... Well thanks for listening to your viewers... you have great content and well produced... thanks again...
The new Smooth Slow Mo feature is amazing, super fast compared with Topaz/Apollo while more or less same quality, in my test, Topaz sometimes better, sometimes FC better, so very similar! Cant wait for them to add a proper Dnoise AI and Upscaling AI tools!!
Thanks for the info! Nice to hear of a comparison. Yeah, it's pretty amazing IMHO and… "FREE"! 😉 I'm actually quite happy with the results of the Denoiser. I've only gone elsewhere - e.g. Neat - maybe _once_ and that was for a super specific and bad clip. Just not sure it was worth my time in the end setting it up for what the results were. In case you haven't seen it… ruclips.net/video/x5ATDhPHa6E/видео.html
@postpros-e Sorry my comment was sent twice :/ The included FC noise reduction filter is good enough! but still using the old and cheap trick of just contrasting edges for sharpening… Neat video can do a better job for both de-noising while sharpening edges in a better way, it also has anti flicker light, which is amazing. More complicated to use and longer renders, but much better results when you get use to it. And then there is Topaz Video AI, like the father of all of them, differentiates between compression blocking and grain noise, and using AI to preserve outstanding edges while de-noising… the results are just incredible, another level, but rendering times are exxxxcessive. 1h 4k could be 4-5 days of rendering in a Mac Studio M1 Max
@@rogfol Don't get me wrong. I'm certainly not saying that FC's denoiser is the best you can get. Just for the comparative SPEED - there really is no comparison - and PRICE 😉 it's my go-to for the vast majority of tasks, but I'm also not a pixel-peeper. Again, assuming it's not an extreme case and there _aren't_ any of your aforementioned issues as well. In which case for deflickering I use De:Flicker and will use a different sharpener if needed, too. So yeah… there are options, which is great! *_Every_* solution is a give and take. One uses whatever works best for the task at hand. 👍🏼 Cheers!
So are you as impressed with the improvements and results as I am? Have you been able to try it yourself? How was the outcome? Have any especially impressive results? Post a link and let us know in the comments! Thanks for watching and leave us a like and subscribe if you learned something that you maybe haven't seen elsewhere. 😉
Excellent tutorial. Thank you!
Glad to hear! Thanks for watching.
for some reason my FCP doesn't have the slow mo option after the new update. would you know why? I have 10.8
same. did you figure it out?
@@Kevin_Cate no I haven’t. I’ve updated to the latest and still nothing
I have the same problem, I read somewhere that if your Mac isn't running with Apple Silicon then this particular feature wont be available. I have an intel chip so that makes sense for me.
Sorry, I was never notified of your comment!
You may have already figured out the issue, but if not, I can only assume that you either don't have an Apple Silicon Mac, as I point out in the video as being a requirement, OR you don't have at least macOS *_Ventura_* v13.5 installed. Or BOTH? Otherwise, I can't of a reason why it wouldn't show up. Hope that helps!
That's exactly what will be the reason, yes. As I in fact explicitly point out in the video at 01:18 ! 😉
Day one FCPX user, never heard of rate conform 😅
Thanks for sharing 🤝🏼
Any time! And funny enough, I literally had taken that part back out at one point thinking it was too long and "Surely everyone knows about this already…" 😄 Very happy to hear that it didn't go unnoticed! Cheers!
The new Smooth Slow Mo feature is amazing, super fast compared with Topaz/Apollo while more or less same quality, in my test, Topaz sometimes better, sometimes FC better, so very similar! Cant wait for them to add a proper Dnoise AI and Upscaling AI tools!!
Thanks for the info!
I apprecitae your video but none of the clips you used this feature on are usable with commercial client work. Maybe fine for hobby videos but after my own experiments with this feature in FCPX i can def say the tech is not there yet and def not ready for prime time.
Being on RUclips, I am very limited in the material that I can use. In other words, I can't use any of my "commercial" material for copyright reasons. But then I have no idea what qualifies a clip as being "commercial" anyway. If the results are not usable for you, then I can only assume that the footage is just plain unsuited to begin with, or you simply went way overboard. No one claims this to be a magic bullet for _any in every_ type of footage. Obviously, there will always be shots that will suffer, especially if you overdo it.
But I'd love to know which alternatives _* are_* "ready for prime time" in your opinion, and I can gladly do a comparison. Because I don't know of any that get anywhere close. At least none that are effectively FREE. I have yet to get results that were completely unusable.
I like it...
Me too. 😄
SUGGESTION: First thank you for this video its very informative and much needed... kudos to you... I do have one suggestion, It seems like you have color graded your videos.. and the desktop/final cut pro window when you are showing us the software its so dark... for a minute I thought it was my monitor and and had to compare it to others... and yes your videos are much darker... please consider not dimming the screen you are showing as this is why people are watching your videos... thanks again for the great content... here another video for comparison how bright it is.. ruclips.net/video/lC5qQWyTuZ0/видео.html
Hey, thanks for the feedback! I believe the issue is that the clips are *HDR* and the RUclips conversion is somehow dimming them down, because the originals are as they should be (at 75%). Watching them in HDR should be fine. I'll probably have to switch to using 100% HDR luminance rage from now on, which I don't usually like to do. Oh well. Thanks for watching!
@@postpros-e That would explain why the screens are DIM.... Well thanks for listening to your viewers... you have great content and well produced... thanks again...
The new Smooth Slow Mo feature is amazing, super fast compared with Topaz/Apollo while more or less same quality, in my test, Topaz sometimes better, sometimes FC better, so very similar! Cant wait for them to add a proper Dnoise AI and Upscaling AI tools!!
Thanks for the info! Nice to hear of a comparison. Yeah, it's pretty amazing IMHO and… "FREE"! 😉
I'm actually quite happy with the results of the Denoiser. I've only gone elsewhere - e.g. Neat - maybe _once_ and that was for a super specific and bad clip. Just not sure it was worth my time in the end setting it up for what the results were.
In case you haven't seen it… ruclips.net/video/x5ATDhPHa6E/видео.html
@postpros-e Sorry my comment was sent twice :/
The included FC noise reduction filter is good enough! but still using the old and cheap trick of just contrasting edges for sharpening…
Neat video can do a better job for both de-noising while sharpening edges in a better way, it also has anti flicker light, which is amazing. More complicated to use and longer renders, but much better results when you get use to it.
And then there is Topaz Video AI, like the father of all of them, differentiates between compression blocking and grain noise, and using AI to preserve outstanding edges while de-noising… the results are just incredible, another level, but rendering times are exxxxcessive. 1h 4k could be 4-5 days of rendering in a Mac Studio M1 Max
@@rogfol Don't get me wrong. I'm certainly not saying that FC's denoiser is the best you can get. Just for the comparative SPEED - there really is no comparison - and PRICE 😉 it's my go-to for the vast majority of tasks, but I'm also not a pixel-peeper. Again, assuming it's not an extreme case and there _aren't_ any of your aforementioned issues as well. In which case for deflickering I use De:Flicker and will use a different sharpener if needed, too. So yeah… there are options, which is great! *_Every_* solution is a give and take. One uses whatever works best for the task at hand. 👍🏼
Cheers!