Sir , we want the many lesson of Relative Pronouns. Because it is very difficult to us. Please this lessons present as any ways. every your lessons is very important to us as well as we are watching every lessons .Good job sir. 👍❤✨
A comma is used when the relative clause part is not essential to understand the meaning of the sentence. However, in this case, 'who was driving recklessly' clause is essential to understand about which subject it is spoken of in this sentence. Hence, it is not required to use a comma in this sentence for the relative clause. Hope this explanation is clear. If it is not clear, please call me on 0768 348 661 to give further clarification. Thanks.
Sure. There have already been many videos published on this topic. Search on my channel & you can find a lot. I will make a few in future as well. Thanks.
Please close the gate since the beggars wandering in the street might come in. This is a better way. Rather than using 'in case', since is a much more suitable word in this context. Thanks.
The sentence is incomplete. Your clause describes Arjuna, but doesn't state what happens after the clause. Give me a call for further explanation, because it's a bit of a lengthy one. 0768348661. Thanks.
1. The stolen bike was found in the lake. 2. The bike which was stolen was found in the lake. Sir, what about this 2nd sentence grammatically correct or not?
A girl was injured in the accident She is now in hospital A girl WHO i was injured in the accidenr is now in hopital. හැපුණු එකේදී අනතුරට පත් වුන ගැහෑණු ලමයා දැන් ඉන්නේ රෝහලේ... The eatress WHO served us in the restudet was impolite and impatient. අපිට අවන්හලේ save කරපු වේටර්වරිය ඉවසීම හා වීනීත නෑ.. පින් සර්ට....
There are a few corrections that need to be done to the sentences you have written. 01. A girl who was injured in the accident is now in hospital. 02. The waitress who served us in the restaurant was impolite and impatient.
I reckon you refer to the sentence "Malinda works for a company which makes furniture". The relative pronoun in this sentence doesn't describe the person, but the company. That's the reason why the relative pronoun "which" is used in this sentence. If we rewrite the sentence in this way, then the relative pronoun "who" is possible. "Malinda, who works for a company, makes furniture". So, for the first example sentence that I have given, the right relative pronoun to be used is which. Hope my explanation is clear.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
සර්, හොඳ පාඩමක්, sir, that is a great episode
Thanks for your feedback.
Sir , we want the many lesson of Relative Pronouns. Because it is very difficult to us. Please this lessons present as any ways. every your lessons is very important to us as well as we are watching every lessons .Good job sir. 👍❤✨
Thanks for your feedback. I'll make more lessons on relative pronouns.
Thank you sir it's very valuable for me
You're most welcome.
❤ 0:08
There are no words to say.. such a valuable lesson sir 🫡❤️
Thanks for your feedback.
Very important ❤
Thank you.
බොහෝම ස්තුතියි ඔබට
Thanks for your feedback.
very impotant lesson Sir.....🙏🌹🙏🌹
You're most welcome.
Thank you 🔥
You are welcome.
nice kollo
👍👍👍
Thx sir good lesion
You're most welcome.
Maara pahadili 😃❤️👑
Thanks for your feedback.
Ane pin sir🙏🙏
You're most welcome.
Call kale kamala da?
Kamala da call kare me 2 kiyana widiha kiyanawada sir
Is it Kamala who called? - for both the sentences, you can use this one since you don't have to do word by word translation. Thank you.
Why did you miss " , " of "who" sentences in the last sentences ?
A comma is used when the relative clause part is not essential to understand the meaning of the sentence. However, in this case, 'who was driving recklessly' clause is essential to understand about which subject it is spoken of in this sentence. Hence, it is not required to use a comma in this sentence for the relative clause. Hope this explanation is clear. If it is not clear, please call me on 0768 348 661 to give further clarification. Thanks.
Sir, " that was to be translated " kiyana structure eka mokakda?
To be structure.
That means passive voice?
Yes
It's worth for me, can u meke more videos for the clauses
Sure. There have already been many videos published on this topic. Search on my channel & you can find a lot. I will make a few in future as well. Thanks.
@@EnglishwithNonis I fond your channel but I didn't find such as Adjective & adverb clauses lessons. Thanks for the reply me!!
Sri cama sambanad full video ekak karanna puluwanda
Sure. I have already covered many usages of comas in various lessons. However, I will do a dedicated lesson on the usage of coma. Thanks.
❤
You're welcome
can't i say the girl was injured in the accident who is now hospital .
That is incorrect. The relative pronoun needs to come after what it modifies. Thanks.
“Kamala is a doctor,who lives next door. “ is this correct?
Kamala, who is a doctor, lives next door.
The building was destroyed in the fire which has now been rebuilt
Am I right sir
The building which was destroyed in fire has now been rebuilt.
"Please close the gate in case the beggars who are wandering on the street come in". Sir, is this sentence correct?
Please close the gate since the beggars wandering in the street might come in. This is a better way. Rather than using 'in case', since is a much more suitable word in this context. Thanks.
"Arjuna Ranatunga who was the captain when we won the cricket world cup in 1996". Is this sentence correct sir?
The sentence is incomplete. Your clause describes Arjuna, but doesn't state what happens after the clause. Give me a call for further explanation, because it's a bit of a lengthy one. 0768348661. Thanks.
සතුන් ගැන කථා කරන විට relative pronoun වලදී" that" විතරයි නේද? භාවිත කළ හැකියන්නේ?
Which is also used.
Ok, sir....👍
Nimal has lost the maths book, someone who found it, please give it to him. Is this sentence correct sir?
Nimal has lost his Maths book. Whoever finds it, please give it to him.
👍👍👍
You're most welcome.
1. The stolen bike was found in the lake.
2. The bike which was stolen was found in the lake.
Sir, what about this 2nd sentence grammatically correct or not?
Correct.
El
Thanks for your feedback
😍😍😍
Thanks for your feedback.
A girl was injured in the accident She is now in hospital
A girl WHO i was injured in the accidenr is now in hopital.
හැපුණු එකේදී අනතුරට පත් වුන ගැහෑණු ලමයා දැන් ඉන්නේ රෝහලේ...
The eatress WHO served us in the restudet was impolite and impatient.
අපිට අවන්හලේ save කරපු වේටර්වරිය ඉවසීම හා වීනීත නෑ..
පින් සර්ට....
There are a few corrections that need to be done to the sentences you have written.
01. A girl who was injured in the accident is now in hospital.
02. The waitress who served us in the restaurant was impolite and impatient.
@@EnglishwithNonis thank you very much Sir....
You're most welcome.
“Kamala is a doctor, who lives next door”. Is this correct?
Or kamala is a doctor, where lives next door,
Both are correct or what?
@@prasadtharaka1528 I would say both are incorrect. Kamala, who is a doctor, lives next door.
🫡digatama karanna sir
Sure.
If didn't use ' , ' with who , is it wrong ?
Yes
12:03 මෙතනට who දාන්න බැයිද? පුද්ගලයෙක්නෙ විස්තර කරන්නෙ
I reckon you refer to the sentence "Malinda works for a company which makes furniture". The relative pronoun in this sentence doesn't describe the person, but the company. That's the reason why the relative pronoun "which" is used in this sentence. If we rewrite the sentence in this way, then the relative pronoun "who" is possible. "Malinda, who works for a company, makes furniture". So, for the first example sentence that I have given, the right relative pronoun to be used is which. Hope my explanation is clear.
Sir, " accident" කියන්නේ noun එකක් නේද? adjective එකක් නෙවේ නේද? ඒකත් එක්ක නිතරම යන verb එකනේ...."meet"
Yes.