@@eloahnon4952 world 🌎🌍 wide it's like this, very few good quality kindergarten places, it's a common problem world 🌎🌍 wide, and your problem is most of the things are hidden
She was feeling threatened. I don't see an attitude. I see an owners with rules and the so called help being played like she a friend to get benefits and perks. There should be a line between friends and business if not this happens. When folks can't run you and your business you the problem.
@@charmanyhaddock3768 No. Sorry. She does have an attitude. She shouldn't treat her paying customers like criminals just because they didn't choose her side in a disagreement with another paying customer. If she felt threatened by her former student's father, she should have installed cameras or something. She's just being spiteful and unprofessional, not to mention vindictive That type of attitude is not good, particularly, when someoe is wotking with young, impressionable children.
@@peterlee584 she not only protecting her home but other folks kids. I wouldn't trust the lady either after acting like just because she pays for the service she owns her and her business. Like I said before. I would discontinue access to code for all the parents til situation got resolved too. Difference between her and me I would have notified her but she probably would like she tried not pay til after going to court
@@charmanyhaddock3768 Sorry. Not buying it. Judging ftom her attitude, I highly doubt that she really gives a damn about protecting the other children in her care. She's just using it as an excuse.
That's a good comment from the defendant, if she'll treat them that way what is she doing to their kid. The judge always right about her rudeness, it was all over her face rudeness smugness she's a hater.
She should be a correction officer not a child care provider...I can't imagine how she talks to the children with no respect for the parents... Just horrible a horrible attitude
She’s probably really good with children. She’s obviously neurospicy and unaware that she’s being rude. Doesn’t make her a bad person. And she probably connects better with children that don’t know all the rules of socializing. Kids are raw and they accept what’s fair. They were there for a year. If the child was being mistreated, they would know.
My child would have never been allowed to stay. That day care lady has a huge chip on her shoulder. Guess that’s why she has to work with kids. She acts like a 10 year old bully.
hi.. a lot!.. let me ask to you something!... if you find out... somebody with your housekeys.. is a friend of your enemy.. what will you do?... ohhhhh.. i wonder!.. yes.. be blessed
The plaintiff is very rude even on tv. I would say the plaintiff lost at the end after her own customers see how she deals with people. She may be out of business right now as we speak.
@@ruthcalfee7868 SAME! Past litigants of this case, or any other case, please reveal yourselves. Would love to know how it all went down and if you were happy with the outcome...unless you signed an NDA 'cause I don't want to get in trouble with the Judge!
hi.. give to her a break!.. she is with belly!.. if you don't know.. how being pregnant can affect you.. body and mind..oh forget it!.. you people looking for somebody.. to ab.use!.. be blessed
@@Cubanflowers No, I’m not looking for someone to abuse. I’m just speaking the truth as I see it, nothing more and nothing less!!! And just because she’s pregnant doesn’t give her the right to be so rude to her paying customers!
A child has a meltdown, the mother puts her in time out(instead of driving away with a screaming, volatile child), and the husband comes out to tell the Defendant, "this can't happen here"?!? How do they act when a child has a tantrum behind closed doors😮? And not giving the code while the child IS STILL THERE?!? The Plaintiff said she was afraid of vandalism. ---Maybe because that's what SHE WOULD DO. The Defendant absolutely had the right to breech, their CHILD was in that psychos hands. I don't agree with the verdict.
Isn’t her not giving the code to the paying customer a breach in the contract? Thus she wouldn’t pay because the provider changed the agreement? I’m confused on the outcome.
I think man was trying to have a conversation with her not the community. Not trying to embarrass her. She didn't think it was rude, inappropriate and embarrassing for child to cry toward daycare? Take your child home and discipline them.
The judge was completely wrong. That plaintiff is crazy!!! If I couldn't get the code to my child-i wouldn't pay either. Can you imagine if there was some sort of accident and you couldn't get in to get your child?! I'm sure in the contract it said somewhere that they would get the code. Wow! The judge was totally wrong.
This Plaintiff is horrendous!!! I would never leave my child with her, NEVER!!! The way her husband gestured to another human as if they were an animal & she fully defended him is so inappropriate. I can only imagine how they treat the innocent babies that are entrusted to their care. I pray her daycare is shut down because she is teaching these children on the daily how to act just like her & her husband.
My goodness, plaintiff sounds like someone that no one likes simply by acting in a way she doesn't approve in the slightest way. She ought to work in prison.
Genuine question-if the plaintiff refused to give the door code doesn’t that mean she broke the contract because how else is the mom/defendant going to drop off and pick up the child-doesn’t that mean she kicked them out essentially? So why does she deserve the rest of the payment when she’s culpable for breaching the contract?
Professionals understand where do draw the line with their clients. The day care providers lack of boundaries is the big issue here. Payment or not, she lost.
I love this show. It just goes to show how finicky judges can be and how the law only really applies how they want it to. Was the daycare provider rude, absolutely. Did the parents sign a contract saying they would pay and what the late fee structure was, absolutely. Throwing it out because you deem it excessive is stupid. She awards pre judgement statutory interest left and right. Different amounts, same principle. You didn’t pay when you should have so here’s a penalty.
If you express an issue with me, I am NOT leaving my kids with you. IDC. When my daughter was in daycare I treated them very well, and always paid on time because people are funny and they take their issues out on your kids.
I feel like the judge is wrong in this case, if you lock a parent away from their child and don't give them a key code, then that should automatically get them out of the contract, case closed!
The plaintiff behaved like her customers were her friends. It sounds like she didn't maintain a professional distance. It's possible to be a caring, empathetic, and compassionate caregiver without being in a relationship with the clients. Professional boundaries are important. Talking about you made a choice about sides. Woman! Puh-lease!
Wow!!! Cold day in hell that I'm not given an access code to where my child was being taken care of!!! So what, the parents would need to go the next two weeks without the code??? Nahhhh... hard pass...
Idk. If I’ve always had a code to access my child and then you cut that off, I feel like that’s breach enough that I can quit paying and leaving my child there.
At :46, during the intro where Harvey’s says the defendants “think the judge will agree”, lady defendant has a very questioning look on her face, as if to say, “I don’t know about that, dude.” Is this in Neptune Beach, FL? There was a Little Red Barn Daycare there.
I ran a licensed Daycare for years, not giving the parents the pass code to get in the door where their children are is not acceptable and I'm sure it's illegal. Parents need to be able to gain access to their children at any time during the period that they are in the custody of the provider. A lot could happen in a Daycare setting and that may make it impossible for the provider to get to the door to open it. If the parents don't have access and you are unable to open the door you are putting the children in danger. Not to mention that in some extreme cases, denying the parents unrestricted access to their children could be considered kidnapping. A provider never has a right to block a parent from getting their children without having to wait for their permission to enter the center.
I had to watch again. There was no attitude because her husband told her her child cant bring that energy to their home? She had no access to building not her child, lol!
Man no way I’m leaving my child with someone who doesn’t even show respect to me as a parent. And the min I don’t have access to my child when I’ve had access in the past, I’m out
The wife should have calm down the mother not her husband and that Day Care woman is rude and has no business working with children can you imagine how she talks to the kids she shouldn’t have got paid
The plaintiff really shouldn’t work with the public. Everything she did was immature and inappropriate. Don’t carry baggage from on parent to another claiming they chose sides🙄 how immature is she? They’re not in high school!
She shouldn't have to pay anything. Changing the code is like being locked out by a roommate. That plaintiff is nasty and they should make sure they give her daycare nasty reviews.
That's some nerve, to deny a parent the access code and then sue for fees. What a bunch of nonsense. I disagree with the verdict as having to call ahead or yell over the fence instead of using the access code was never part of the agreement for care there and the parents didn't agree.
There’s no way I’m letting my child stay at a daycare place when they change the code on me and I can’t have access to my child and unless I holler over a fence for someone to come let me in at their leisure. If the defendants had made a big deal about it when it initially happened instead of waiting a few days, it would’ve been a different story.
People on the street are dense. Attitude has everything to do with who is looking after my child!!! My kid wouldn't be going to daycare there. Glad JM grilled her on her attitude. And I'm sorry she got one more $1 from the couple.
Oh please you guys are a bunch of big babies about the attitude and what happens if it was vice versa where the parents was giving the attitude and be nasty to the daycare and then the daycare decides not to keep your kid then you going to have a attitude because of her canceling you grow up and stop being so sensitive
Imagine.. a toddler/very young child having a tantrum and the daycare person going there and telling the mum this can't happen in front of the daycare where the toddler didn't sleep. pff... whoever that man is.. he probably would press mute on his dog or child if he could
![Judge Judy [Episode 9959] Best Amazing Cases Season 2024 Full Episodes HD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qljTNP1L5Gs/mqdefault.jpg)
The plaintiff is a psycho. So inappropriate. She's acting like the kids she 'takes care of' 🙄😳
She has such a nasty attitude, no wonder her business is closed as of 2024. She was in the Beaverton, OR area.
her own kids, poor kids
You know her personally?
Good, she doesn't need to be "caring" for kids.
@@eloahnon4952 world 🌎🌍 wide it's like this, very few good quality kindergarten places, it's a common problem world 🌎🌍 wide, and your problem is most of the things are hidden
@@alakazam9636 it's a world 🌎🌎🌍 wide problem of bad kindergarten places, very few real quality kindergarten, most are shady
She has such a nasty attitude….i wouldn’t keep my kids there either
She was feeling threatened. I don't see an attitude. I see an owners with rules and the so called help being played like she a friend to get benefits and perks. There should be a line between friends and business if not this happens. When folks can't run you and your business you the problem.
@@charmanyhaddock3768 No. Sorry. She does have an attitude. She shouldn't treat her paying customers like criminals just because they didn't choose her side in a disagreement with another paying customer.
If she felt threatened by her former student's father, she should have installed cameras or something. She's just being spiteful and unprofessional, not to mention vindictive
That type of attitude is not good, particularly, when someoe is wotking with young, impressionable children.
@@peterlee584 she not only protecting her home but other folks kids. I wouldn't trust the lady either after acting like just because she pays for the service she owns her and her business. Like I said before. I would discontinue access to code for all the parents til situation got resolved too. Difference between her and me I would have notified her but she probably would like she tried not pay til after going to court
@@charmanyhaddock3768 Sorry. Not buying it. Judging ftom her attitude, I highly doubt that she really gives a damn about protecting the other children in her care. She's just using it as an excuse.
@@peterlee584 I already explained on here what I think happened. I have experienced people thinking I'm "the help" til they can't use anymore
Plaintiff may have won the money but shes definitely gonna lose once she gets home and people see that episode.
Yeah, she is an absolute idiot.
can you just imagine how she treats her kids and the other peoples kids if she acts like this on TV
... some people could never hurt a child but would work as contract killers.
Its a privilege being a child.
But it would be skeptical too
RIGHT, ...AND MAYB MUCH N SO THATS ITS GONNA MAKE THAT $341...LOOK LIKE LIL PENNIES 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 #GOTSABMOREattitudishCAREFUL🤓🧐🤨😳😳😳🤣
🇺🇸❤️🙏🏽yep she has children’s skills but adult communication skills not🇺🇸❤️🙏🏽
That's a good comment from the defendant, if she'll treat them that way what is she doing to their kid. The judge always right about her rudeness, it was all over her face rudeness smugness she's a hater.
She should be a correction officer not a child care provider...I can't imagine how she talks to the children with no respect for the parents... Just horrible a horrible attitude
As a former officer she can't get away with nothing
Yeah I wouldn't trust her with kids
Nailed it
She’s probably really good with children. She’s obviously neurospicy and unaware that she’s being rude. Doesn’t make her a bad person. And she probably connects better with children that don’t know all the rules of socializing. Kids are raw and they accept what’s fair. They were there for a year. If the child was being mistreated, they would know.
My child would have never been allowed to stay. That day care lady has a huge chip on her shoulder. Guess that’s why she has to work with kids. She acts like a 10 year old bully.
The fact that the key code would not be available to them is the deal breaker. come on
100%!!
💯💯💯
I agree
Right! They shouldn’t have had to pay. She ran them off with her nasty ways. She breached the contract with the code.
If every other paying client had the code then, of course, they should have the code.
With that kind of animosity, I definitely wouldn't leave my kid with the Plaintiff.
The sitter is very rude!
What business is it of hers who that lady is friends with 😮
hi.. a lot!.. let me ask to you something!... if you find out... somebody with your housekeys.. is a friend of your enemy.. what will you do?... ohhhhh.. i wonder!.. yes.. be blessed
plaintiff doesn’t seem to have the temperament to care for children
her own kids, poor kids
Plaintiff came in like she was walking into a prize fight. Good lord tone it down.
"When the late fees are more than the fees, that's excessive "
Tell that to the credit card companies!
The plaintiff is very rude even on tv. I would say the plaintiff lost at the end after her own customers see how she deals with people. She may be out of business right now as we speak.
here is a message saying of 2024 its closed, how thy know it its not said,
The daycare owner is the type of person that ain’t happy unless there’s drama going on
the day care lady is amazingly insufferable. My goodness.
I wouldn’t let her watch my stuffed animals. Very rude!
@@kellll3420I love your response!!! I often wonder if the litigants watch their episode, and if they ever realize that they are the problem!
@@ruthcalfee7868 SAME! Past litigants of this case, or any other case, please reveal yourselves. Would love to know how it all went down and if you were happy with the outcome...unless you signed an NDA 'cause I don't want to get in trouble with the Judge!
hi.. give to her a break!.. she is with belly!.. if you don't know.. how being pregnant can affect you.. body and mind..oh forget it!.. you people looking for somebody.. to ab.use!.. be blessed
@@Cubanflowers No, I’m not looking for someone to abuse. I’m just speaking the truth as I see it, nothing more and nothing less!!! And just because she’s pregnant doesn’t give her the right to be so rude to her paying customers!
It’s crazy how an ugly inside can really make your outside look even more horrendous.
changing the code, so that I can’t come in to get MY kid(s) when I get ready, is a problem…. Can’t believe JM didn’t agree.
Yeah, that was really weird. MM can get really stubborn sometimes and brings her own prejudice and preconceived notions to the cases.
The plaintiff is insane.
I wouldn’t let the Plaintiff babysit my pet rock.
A child has a meltdown, the mother puts her in time out(instead of driving away with a screaming, volatile child), and the husband comes out to tell the Defendant, "this can't happen here"?!? How do they act when a child has a tantrum behind closed doors😮? And not giving the code while the child IS STILL THERE?!? The Plaintiff said she was afraid of vandalism.
---Maybe because that's what SHE WOULD DO. The Defendant absolutely had the right to breech, their CHILD was in that psychos hands. I don't agree with the verdict.
If she has any kids left in that daycare after this aired I'd be shocked!
here is a message saying that of 2024 its closed
The plaintiff's attitude was STANK!! 🤨
The parents should have won this case.
Isn’t her not giving the code to the paying customer a breach in the contract? Thus she wouldn’t pay because the provider changed the agreement? I’m confused on the outcome.
Wow, I really hope her business is closed. How can you have that level of anger and lack of ability to control it and work with kids.
someone has left a comment saying that from 2024 its closed
I'm so glad the judge said that because the entire time I was thinking the plaintiff was just freaking nasty!!!!
I would never leave my child with that woman. Her evil smile at the end said it all
I expect daycare ppl to be more polite and tactful…
Never knew waving someone to come to you was rude 🤔
I think man was trying to have a conversation with her not the community. Not trying to embarrass her. She didn't think it was rude, inappropriate and embarrassing for child to cry toward daycare? Take your child home and discipline them.
The finger thing n how ita saud can be rude
She wouldn't keep my dog
She must be the only daycare in town because she screams red flags with attitude and handling business
Sounds like plaintiff breached the contract by creating a hostile atmosphere for all involved.
The judge was completely wrong. That plaintiff is crazy!!! If I couldn't get the code to my child-i wouldn't pay either. Can you imagine if there was some sort of accident and you couldn't get in to get your child?! I'm sure in the contract it said somewhere that they would get the code. Wow! The judge was totally wrong.
This Plaintiff is horrendous!!! I would never leave my child with her, NEVER!!! The way her husband gestured to another human as if they were an animal & she fully defended him is so inappropriate. I can only imagine how they treat the innocent babies that are entrusted to their care. I pray her daycare is shut down because she is teaching these children on the daily how to act just like her & her husband.
My goodness, plaintiff sounds like someone that no one likes simply by acting in a way she doesn't approve in the slightest way. She ought to work in prison.
I thank the good Lord for allowing me to be a stay at home mom.
Plaintiff is downright childish. She’s immature and won’t be in business long if this is her attitude.
here is a comment saying that as from 2024 its been closed,
Imagine how she deals with the children wowww
Yeaaa the daycare lady kinda got an attitude. It doesn't cause much comfort knowing she does a good job. The attitude over rules that unfortunately.
Kinda? She’s full on confrontational and bizarre.
We have a name for people like the plaintiff. It starts with a capital "B."
The plaintiff been sassy for a long time. I noticed that on how she walked in. Walked with that sas.. meow 🫵🏽🤣
She shouldn’t care for children
The plaintiff is nasty. I wonder how her business went after being on TV with that attitude.
Someone else commented that it was closed as of 2024. I wonder if the case had anything to do with it? Or, more likely her display of attitude😂?
@@jennifer_mertens oh yes for sure, must be,
Yea I would have dropped this daycare immediately good luck getting your money from me
Genuine question-if the plaintiff refused to give the door code doesn’t that mean she broke the contract because how else is the mom/defendant going to drop off and pick up the child-doesn’t that mean she kicked them out essentially? So why does she deserve the rest of the payment when she’s culpable for breaching the contract?
She breached her own contract… this wasn’t fair
The plaintiff is something else. W/ that attitude if I had kids they wouldn’t be going there.
Bullshit. Plaintiff did not deserve to win.
Professionals understand where do draw the line with their clients. The day care providers lack of boundaries is the big issue here. Payment or not, she lost.
How did she receive her daycare license to teach anyone!?
I love this show. It just goes to show how finicky judges can be and how the law only really applies how they want it to. Was the daycare provider rude, absolutely. Did the parents sign a contract saying they would pay and what the late fee structure was, absolutely. Throwing it out because you deem it excessive is stupid. She awards pre judgement statutory interest left and right. Different amounts, same principle. You didn’t pay when you should have so here’s a penalty.
If you express an issue with me, I am NOT leaving my kids with you. IDC. When my daughter was in daycare I treated them very well, and always paid on time because people are funny and they take their issues out on your kids.
I feel like the judge is wrong in this case, if you lock a parent away from their child and don't give them a key code, then that should automatically get them out of the contract, case closed!
Defendant was such a nice person❤
The man, on the right side of the street audience, looks like Mulvaney...took down Budweiser single handedly 😅😂
This daycare must have a post reading:
Leave children at your own risk 😩
She was a paying customer.
She had such a smug smile. She was so rude.
The plaintiff behaved like her customers were her friends. It sounds like she didn't maintain a professional distance. It's possible to be a caring, empathetic, and compassionate caregiver without being in a relationship with the clients. Professional boundaries are important. Talking about you made a choice about sides. Woman! Puh-lease!
They protected their child. That daycare operator is HORRIBLE!!!
The daycare provider is super rude! And so is her husband!
The defendant had nothing to say after the judge called her out on her bad attitude, just kept smirking.
Defendant?
Is this about people being rude or talking to you in a way you don’t like.
I get why the plaintiff won but I didn’t want her to lol
Hahahaha if she thinks bad reviews are threats, I bet she didn’t like it after this went live.
This is why I keep my toddler in daycare
I can't imagine leaving my kids with someone with that much attitude. JM made the legally responsible call but it still felt kinda icky.
Attitude has everything to do with services
Be careful leaving your kids with that lady lol she would never try me like that
Wow!!! Cold day in hell that I'm not given an access code to where my child was being taken care of!!! So what, the parents would need to go the next two weeks without the code??? Nahhhh... hard pass...
Idk. If I’ve always had a code to access my child and then you cut that off, I feel like that’s breach enough that I can quit paying and leaving my child there.
At :46, during the intro where Harvey’s says the defendants “think the judge will agree”, lady defendant has a very questioning look on her face, as if to say, “I don’t know about that, dude.” Is this in Neptune Beach, FL? There was a Little Red Barn Daycare there.
I ran a licensed Daycare for years, not giving the parents the pass code to get in the door where their children are is not acceptable and I'm sure it's illegal. Parents need to be able to gain access to their children at any time during the period that they are in the custody of the provider. A lot could happen in a Daycare setting and that may make it impossible for the provider to get to the door to open it. If the parents don't have access and you are unable to open the door you are putting the children in danger. Not to mention that in some extreme cases, denying the parents unrestricted access to their children could be considered kidnapping. A provider never has a right to block a parent from getting their children without having to wait for their permission to enter the center.
I had to watch again. There was no attitude because her husband told her her child cant bring that energy to their home? She had no access to building not her child, lol!
When plaintiff came in the court room I knew she had a really bad attitude and I was correct 💯
There's no way I would let the plaintiff take care of my children. That lady is nuts
Plaintiff is a horribly rude person, she gives orders and behaves like a mafia boss, imagine how she must be behaving with innocent, young children.
Man no way I’m leaving my child with someone who doesn’t even show respect to me as a parent. And the min I don’t have access to my child when I’ve had access in the past, I’m out
Wow! The plaintiff has a terrible attitude. She should work in a prison with that attitude and see how far she gets.
The wife should have calm down the mother not her husband and that Day Care woman is rude and has no business working with children can you imagine how she talks to the kids she shouldn’t have got paid
This Plaintiff is so unprofessional. I wouldn’t give her a dime and I wouldn’t let her watch my child.
The plaintiff really shouldn’t work with the public. Everything she did was immature and inappropriate. Don’t carry baggage from on parent to another claiming they chose sides🙄 how immature is she? They’re not in high school!
She shouldn't have to pay anything. Changing the code is like being locked out by a roommate. That plaintiff is nasty and they should make sure they give her daycare nasty reviews.
I just know that the families in this neighborhood ate her up in the reviews. Because she’s closed now. But she’s RUDE!!
Woo no!! With an attitude like that, who needs to worry about the safety of our kids? I see she closed down. It's what she deserves.
The plaintiff is so petty, she should not be in charge of children with her attitude
So petty for adults
She's very dismissive and rude.
Unbelievable. What a nasty person , thank God she’s not in business anymore
🇺🇸❤️🙏🏽learning video Americans🇺🇸❤️🙏🏽
That's some nerve, to deny a parent the access code and then sue for fees. What a bunch of nonsense. I disagree with the verdict as having to call ahead or yell over the fence instead of using the access code was never part of the agreement for care there and the parents didn't agree.
The plaintiff if so rude and unprofessional and has no clue.
There’s no way I’m letting my child stay at a daycare place when they change the code on me and I can’t have access to my child and unless I holler over a fence for someone to come let me in at their leisure. If the defendants had made a big deal about it when it initially happened instead of waiting a few days, it would’ve been a different story.
People on the street are dense. Attitude has everything to do with who is looking after my child!!! My kid wouldn't be going to daycare there. Glad JM grilled her on her attitude. And I'm sorry she got one more $1 from the couple.
Oh please you guys are a bunch of big babies about the attitude and what happens if it was vice versa where the parents was giving the attitude and be nasty to the daycare and then the daycare decides not to keep your kid then you going to have a attitude because of her canceling you grow up and stop being so sensitive
If bad attitude and chismosa had a face 😂🙄
Imagine.. a toddler/very young child having a tantrum and the daycare person going there and telling the mum this can't happen in front of the daycare where the toddler didn't sleep.
pff... whoever that man is.. he probably would press mute on his dog or child if he could
What is up with the plaintiff rolling her head and neck? She thinks she is tuff. She needs to be put on her place period