The words of one of Kasparov's seconds, Andrei Kharlov: "Ninety percent of success in World Championship matches is due to psychology- this is the most important thing that I've learnt from working with Kasparov. I think that Garry lost the match in 2000 mainly for psychological reasons. Kasparov kind of 'invented' Kramnik, he plucked him from obscurity and always treated him respectfully, he considered him his heir. When Kramnik was still studying in the Botvinnik-Kasparov school, even then Garry said that Kramnik would be the next World Champion. Botvinnik's money was on Shirov. Kasparov spoke very highly of Kramnik for all these years, he said that unlike other chess players Kramnik always played 'grand chess'. Garry secretly wanted to win his argument with Botvinnik, to prove that his choice was the correct one. Kasparov couldn't give up his subjective evaluation of Kramnik's real strength, it seemed to him that his reign as champion should logically conclude with the transfer of the title to Kramnik. Of course, he fought, and he fought desperately, but a certain sense of doom slipped into his actions, a belief in a fixed destiny that he couldn't change. Sometimes he'd come in after a game, and, commenting on one of Kramnik's moves, he said: "A brilliant move!" And afterwards we looked at it a little more deeply and it turned out that the move was far from even the best one in the position, but on the contrary, with precise play Garry could have created big problems for his opponent. He respected Kramnik too much, he believed in him too much. I think that only a deep psychological breakdown can explain these serious mistakes that Garry made during the match. By the way, after the match Kasparov played the same openings against Kramnik, the same positions, and he felt very confident in them, and even won in the Berlin."
just a suggestion : instead of the history you should have showed hi impressive winning records like once he went on a streak winning many tournaments in a row
Chess is a game of Grand Master with many mistakes ....Gary or Magnus or mortal being or chess genius dare challenge todays top chess engines like Stockfish 17 or Torch or L0C result will be 100 to 0 out of 100 in machines favour that proves watching chess or wasting time in it just useless
![Exactly How Good Was Vishy Anand? [Chess Documentary]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hpb5nP6K6ZY/mqdefault.jpg)
Hello I am new to the channel. So my first video. That's an interesting video, and it seem well done. Thanks for the production
Thanks!
Very well done video. Didn't know about the Karpov beating Kasparov 3 times in a row. Thanks for that info!
Thank you and welcome!
Fischer vs Kasparov would have been incredible to see.
Fascinating little film. Kasparov the King.
Let's replace "his old enemy" with "his old rival".
That means u don't understand chinese well..
Bobby Fischer next please
Yes. Next video is on him.
Wow , a very well put together video I must say..Good work buddy
Thanks! Glad you think so!
Its sad that he considered kramnik his heir
The words of one of Kasparov's seconds, Andrei Kharlov:
"Ninety percent of success in World Championship matches is due to psychology- this is the most important thing that I've learnt from working with Kasparov. I think that Garry lost the match in 2000 mainly for psychological reasons.
Kasparov kind of 'invented' Kramnik, he plucked him from obscurity and always treated him respectfully, he considered him his heir. When Kramnik was still studying in the Botvinnik-Kasparov school, even then Garry said that Kramnik would be the next World Champion. Botvinnik's money was on Shirov. Kasparov spoke very highly of Kramnik for all these years, he said that unlike other chess players Kramnik always played 'grand chess'. Garry secretly wanted to win his argument with Botvinnik, to prove that his choice was the correct one.
Kasparov couldn't give up his subjective evaluation of Kramnik's real strength, it seemed to him that his reign as champion should logically conclude with the transfer of the title to Kramnik. Of course, he fought, and he fought desperately, but a certain sense of doom slipped into his actions, a belief in a fixed destiny that he couldn't change. Sometimes he'd come in after a game, and, commenting on one of Kramnik's moves, he said: "A brilliant move!" And afterwards we looked at it a little more deeply and it turned out that the move was far from even the best one in the position, but on the contrary, with precise play Garry could have created big problems for his opponent. He respected Kramnik too much, he believed in him too much.
I think that only a deep psychological breakdown can explain these serious mistakes that Garry made during the match. By the way, after the match Kasparov played the same openings against Kramnik, the same positions, and he felt very confident in them, and even won in the Berlin."
@@SixtyfourSquares_1 :O
@@Mr-Phllyc-XX Why is that sad?
just a suggestion : instead of the history you should have showed hi impressive winning records like once he went on a streak winning many tournaments in a row
Thanks for the feedback. Noted.
thank hell you fixed the audio coming from only one side
What is this background music? It’s very nice and soothing. Please let me know.😅 Btw the video was really nice and enlightening.
Music - Madmen-carousel
Pretty well done.
Very interesting.
Begin the procedure.
Very good video!! Keep it up!!
Thanks, will do!
where are you from?
Chess is a game of Grand Master with many mistakes ....Gary or Magnus or mortal being or chess genius dare challenge todays top chess engines like Stockfish 17 or Torch or L0C result will be 100 to 0 out of 100 in machines favour that proves watching chess or wasting time in it just useless
Cool!
Thanks!
Please Subscribe, If you liked the video😅
Very nice quantant
Thanks
great video
Glad you enjoyed it
Stronger than anyone, better than anyone but Karpov (good and strong are not the same), more unpleasant than anyone but Fischer and Carlsen.
I edged to your voice.
AI VOICE