Ukraine could “force Putin into a ceasefire” as China withdraws support | Michael Binyon

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 апр 2024
  • “Ukraine could force Russia into a ceasefire, potentially with the help of China.”
    Following the US aid package to Ukraine was approved, Michael Binyon gives his opinion on what it will take to end the war in Ukraine.
    📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.co.uk/radio
    📍 Subscribe to our channel - / @listentotimesradio
    🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/...
    📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-...

Комментарии • 1,1 тыс.

  • @billrumbley
    @billrumbley 16 дней назад +231

    Advocating for a frozen conflict is promising a further conflict.

    • @johnadam2885
      @johnadam2885 16 дней назад +22

      Don't worry, Russia is not seeking a frozen conflict. It is aiming at forcing unconditional surrender.

    • @goenzoy712
      @goenzoy712 16 дней назад

      Certainly true in a way but still what he said about China isn't true.
      They are not happy with conflict true but clearly they don't see any urgency.Also China is waiting for the outcome of US election

    • @andyl8055
      @andyl8055 16 дней назад

      There's also the undisputable reality that we know what has happened to Ukrainians caught in Russian-occupied territory, and it is both gruesome and a crime against humanity.
      The Ukrainians fight because they know that peace under the Russians is much, much worse.

    • @-the1b4u-
      @-the1b4u- 16 дней назад

      You will lose ​@@johnadam2885

    • @DezorianGuy
      @DezorianGuy 16 дней назад +8

      Agree

  • @daleamon2547
    @daleamon2547 16 дней назад +134

    Why on Earth would Ukraine push Russia into a time out where the Russians could train troops and rearm????

    • @davidware9549
      @davidware9549 16 дней назад

      Why u say Russia it’s Putin just think the Russians who do want this war have been signed up and just the think the ones who don’t and if they are forced too what u think they so they will either join groups on Russia to take on Putin or they will choose to fight for Ukraine Putin won’t last to much longer now the 60 billion aide has been past it will continue I have no doubt about that so it’s just the waiting game for Putin to lose lol gonna be so funny

    • @miguelgameiro8063
      @miguelgameiro8063 16 дней назад

      To look for security guarantees

    • @samsungtap4183
      @samsungtap4183 16 дней назад +11

      You don't get it Russia doesn't need to rearm, retrain to regroup...that's the Ukrainian military that is on its knee's ?

    • @imapotato4343
      @imapotato4343 16 дней назад +16

      ​@@samsungtap4183on its knees 😂😂😂 it's going so well for Russia 😂😂

    • @DividendFiend
      @DividendFiend 16 дней назад

      The Russians are using north Korean shells and conscripting 1000 troops per day, the Russians definitely need to rearm.

  • @davidmacdonald1695
    @davidmacdonald1695 16 дней назад +62

    Crimea has not always been russian. For most of its history it was not russian at all. The guest’s knowledge level is weak on a number of points.

    • @michaeldelisieux5252
      @michaeldelisieux5252 16 дней назад

      The “ West” is clearly and visibly playing ball with Russia. The actions are always very thought out, the armament provided ( when provided);is under conditions etc etc etc.
      The question to be made is, Why? What’s the grand game? Is it because the West sees a war with China and Russia would be, finally, the one to come and save the day like it did in the Second World War?
      To allow Russia to keep the Ukrainian territories it now occupies is a slap in the face of the Law abiding countries, a death sentence to the bulk of International Laws under which most of the world (still) follows and an incentive for more free takers advance over their less strong neighbors.
      To be seen.

    • @stephencalcutt8396
      @stephencalcutt8396 16 дней назад +5

      Kiev was a Polish city for 200 years. Western Ukraine is Polish territory stolen by Stalin.

    • @janrasmussen6626
      @janrasmussen6626 16 дней назад +1

      In fact on ALL points 😅

    • @eugenemedvediev
      @eugenemedvediev 15 дней назад +6

      ​@@stephencalcutt8396 You ment Kyiv?

    • @suzannekiraly4480
      @suzannekiraly4480 13 дней назад +1

      Thanks for pointing this out. You beat me to it.

  • @charleswilliams4059
    @charleswilliams4059 16 дней назад +282

    It is seriously shameful that the whole of Europe has dithered recklessly in its support of Ukraine.

    • @user-mz3in7vo5b
      @user-mz3in7vo5b 16 дней назад +7

      Strangely people don't respond well to treats....

    • @urbanarmory
      @urbanarmory 16 дней назад +21

      @@user-mz3in7vo5b I think most people do, but it depends on what kind they like. I prefer pie.

    • @peterclarke3020
      @peterclarke3020 16 дней назад +33

      Europe should have begun ramping up its weapon and ammunition production sooner - but left it to the USA to pick up.
      Now they know they need to make rather more effort, and assign a bit more of their GDP to defense.

    • @philnewton3096
      @philnewton3096 16 дней назад

      😢

    • @davisutton1
      @davisutton1 16 дней назад +4

      @@urbanarmory Dogs love them but not so much threats.

  • @4bps
    @4bps 16 дней назад +160

    This man is ignorant about Ukraine and Ukrainians.

  • @paulyoung4422
    @paulyoung4422 16 дней назад +172

    Only full withdrawal will do.

    • @pauldean8638
      @pauldean8638 16 дней назад +7

      Ha ha ha ha

    • @markmorris1105
      @markmorris1105 16 дней назад +1

      ​@@pauldean8638putin won't be laughing when he's caught up with ❤️ 😂😂🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

    • @ontario1411
      @ontario1411 16 дней назад +7

      😂😂😂😂

    • @user-tt6il2up4o
      @user-tt6il2up4o 16 дней назад +11

      Why would the winning side withdraw?

    • @pauldean8638
      @pauldean8638 16 дней назад

      @@user-tt6il2up4o exactly 👍

  • @IusedtohaveausernameIliked
    @IusedtohaveausernameIliked 16 дней назад +9

    What a lot of people, including Trump, are failing to understand is that money for the Ukrainian war effort doesn't go directly to Ukraine. Most of it goes to American arms manufacturers. And that helps the American economy. It's only Trump's ties to Putin that are holding things up. Most real Republicans actually want to help Ukraine and wanted to all along.

    • @jcoker423
      @jcoker423 16 дней назад

      If Trump is elected, he will make Putin an offer 'he can't refuse'. Putin would never have invaded Ukr under Trump, only under sleepy Joe.

    • @peetky8645
      @peetky8645 16 дней назад

      which is really gross unless you are a sociopath who likes making money off of death.

    • @willdon.1279
      @willdon.1279 13 дней назад +1

      @@peetky8645 Pointing out an obvious, if sad, truth, does not mean one approves of it. Arms DO have to be made somewhere, and have to be paid for. I was one who celebrated the peace dividend, and hate what is going on all over. Gaza could be a Mediterranean Singapore if Hamas had spent their (western) millions of aid on the people. But if you are attacked, you must try to defend yourself. And it costs.

  • @VDD-2766
    @VDD-2766 16 дней назад +68

    Why did republicans change their mind? Hello Brits millions of Americans wrote their representatives and they felt the heat!!!!!

    • @freeheeler09
      @freeheeler09 16 дней назад

      Enemy Russian agents like VDD are trying to sway North American and European sentiment towards Putin and against Ukraine. They have swayed easily corruptable politicians like Trump and the German chancellor.

    • @IusedtohaveausernameIliked
      @IusedtohaveausernameIliked 16 дней назад

      Republicans were mostly on board with helping Ukraine all along, it's just that the MAGA minority lost their leverage from their constant shenanigans (and almost lost control of the House itself). Or in other words Putin's influencers inside Congress are getting their butts kicked.

    • @4sjdiwodnx
      @4sjdiwodnx 16 дней назад +2

      they changed their mind about ukraine because their reluctance to support ukraine could be a liability among voters in an election year

    • @allenmitchell09
      @allenmitchell09 16 дней назад +3

      @VDD-2766 exactly!

    • @7171jay
      @7171jay 16 дней назад +7

      @VDD The vote on Ukraine aid happened because Mike Johnson was threatened with losing his position as Speaker of the House and also that Donald Trump realized that making a lot of noise about continuing to block aid was a liability to him as many or most Americans do support Ukraine. It would be nice to think that citizens directly affected Johnson's decision but I think the things I mentioned had much more impact.

  • @JR-mx5pn
    @JR-mx5pn 16 дней назад +124

    This lovely gentleman has a vague understanding of Ukraine and its history. He doesn’t know basic geography either. Crimea historically was Tatar, and changed hands multiple times. Briefly it was incorporated into Soviet Union , but it’s always known to have been Ukrainian rather than Russian.

    • @SS-yt2sq
      @SS-yt2sq 16 дней назад +4

      it is a worthless segment with clickbait title

    • @neolithictransitrevolution427
      @neolithictransitrevolution427 16 дней назад +4

      Salva Ukraine, but I have to disagree that historic Ukraine did include Crimea, or the southern Plains which were only populated by agricultural settlement after Russia pushed out Tatars, and largely by Russians.
      And I say that as a Canadian, where "Historic Canada" is only the Laurentian water shed. Certainly not a reason for invasion.

    • @7171jay
      @7171jay 16 дней назад +3

      @JR With just a few exceptions Times Radio more often finds people to interview who support Russian talking points.

    • @MrDubyadee1
      @MrDubyadee1 16 дней назад +4

      Crimea was Greek with Scythians riding by before it was Tartar. Like everything beyond the Duchy of Muscovy, it was conquered. “Russia proper” is just the Duchy.

    • @nawnaw4709
      @nawnaw4709 16 дней назад +4

      Come on hot you know this is false

  • @bushpocket8619
    @bushpocket8619 16 дней назад +108

    Crimea is strategically very important for Ukraine. How dare you even suggest, that it cannot be recaptured.

    • @jcoker423
      @jcoker423 16 дней назад +17

      Also very difficult for Russia to hold without the bridge and a water supply.

    • @petergreenwood7731
      @petergreenwood7731 16 дней назад +2

      What is Sevastopol famous for?

    • @neolithictransitrevolution427
      @neolithictransitrevolution427 16 дней назад +6

      You're correct, but it's even more strategicly important to Russia, and it will be incredibly difficult to retake if possible. It's famously difficult even.

    • @zackwhite8274
      @zackwhite8274 16 дней назад +4

      Unfortunately there is absolutely no way ukraine takes Crimea back, they don't have the weapons, men or capability to do so, russia took it because ukraine didn't even put up a fight, but look into the history of battles for Crimea, they are devastating, especially for the attacker.

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 16 дней назад +2

      ​@@jcoker423they have a land bridge now and held it without the Kerch bridge before.

  • @TheLucidscreamz
    @TheLucidscreamz 16 дней назад +56

    theres a russian border to retreat back to if want ceasefire , ,

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад +1

      There will be no Russian retreat, haven't you got that yet?

    • @TheLucidscreamz
      @TheLucidscreamz 15 дней назад +1

      @@robertatkins9419 not until the corpse mountain exceeds 5 million

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад +1

      @@TheLucidscreamz Who's 'corpse mountain'? Ukraine's? Well, that's what Lindsey Graham openly advocates, whilst claiming at the same time to be on Ukraine's side. Guess you two are birds of the same putrid feather

  • @gerrytushh
    @gerrytushh 16 дней назад +30

    Whether we like to acknowledge it or not, the Europeans and Americans have been a little too selfish. How could they let Ukraine run out of ammunitions? How are they not providing enough Patriot air defense systems (and they have them)??

    • @braxxian
      @braxxian 16 дней назад

      Have to love how Europe starts all these big wars then air rages at America for doing more to fix it. Perhaps the U.S is just tired of having to clean up your mess.

    • @peter65zzfdfh
      @peter65zzfdfh 15 дней назад

      @@braxxian Russia started the war. The US is defending US interests. It's by US design that much of the world is dependent on them, in their dreams the whole world is.

    • @danl5592
      @danl5592 15 дней назад +1

      ​@@braxxianDidn't USA coup in Ukraine in 2014 which overthrew the democratically elected government and put in USA puppet have something to do with starting this war?😂

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад

      But they don't have them. Don't you follow the news of something? Didn't you hear what NATO Admiral Rob Bauer confessed six months ago?

    • @niburu1508
      @niburu1508 15 дней назад

      😂😂🤡🤡It’s a U.S./NATO proxy war and it’s not going as they planned. Financing and supporting the most corrupt country in Europe has not turned out to have been a good idea. 😂🤡😂🤡😂🤪🤪🤪😋They have started too many other wars again (; inadvertently); in the Middle East and now bearing have the weapons of mass destruction to cover themselves. Have you not been listening?

  • @user-gt7jp4xk8p
    @user-gt7jp4xk8p 16 дней назад +46

    This guy either works for Russia or the BBC

    • @johnadam2885
      @johnadam2885 16 дней назад

      Why, he was not regaling you with false projections of Ukrainian capabilities, so he works for Russia ?

    • @Tiasung
      @Tiasung 16 дней назад +1

      The guy either is a propagandist for Russia or for its enemies, NATO? Do you even think before writing? The 2 are polar opposites.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад

      @@Tiasung Good point. I reckon that this person actually doesn't think before they write, perhaps because they're just too consumed by their own Russophobic hatred.

    • @TheTraveller20081
      @TheTraveller20081 11 дней назад

      ​@@Tiasungthe BBC is one of Great Britain's enemies within.

  • @pauliewalnuts240
    @pauliewalnuts240 16 дней назад +24

    Ukraine doesnt want a ceasefire. Neither does russia. China is continuing support for russia using ever more discreet methods.
    I dont understand why ceasefire is being discussed at all...

    • @macmcleod1188
      @macmcleod1188 16 дней назад +7

      Ukraine will be happy to accept a ceasefire when Russia leaves all of the occupied territory including Crimea

    • @dimas3829
      @dimas3829 15 дней назад +3

      @@macmcleod1188 very funny. Go to your imaginary fairyland and learn that no one gives up what already his without a price.

    • @niburu1508
      @niburu1508 15 дней назад

      Blinken ( the Grim Reaper ); dictating to the Chinese who they owe billions of $ to and threatening them with sanctions if they trade with Russia. Has he heard of BRICS or are they still so dismissive he is ignoring that China has dumped a pile of the debt in exchange for gold?

    • @macmcleod1188
      @macmcleod1188 15 дней назад

      @@dimas3829 sure only in this case, Russia is going to pay the price. And it's probably going to pay it for the next two generations at least. Vladimir Putin has destroyed his country.

    • @gorantomic7150
      @gorantomic7150 12 дней назад

      Co's front is collapsing...in case you missed it 😒

  • @7171jay
    @7171jay 16 дней назад +30

    Ukraine has limits on all NATO weapons in that they can't and don't use things like Stormshadow missiles on the actual territory of Russia proper. As Ukraine have never broken this promise in over two years of war now Germany's worries about the Taurus seem totally imaginary.

    • @andyl8055
      @andyl8055 16 дней назад

      Germany's stated objection to Taurus is that it cannot be deployed without German people on the ground in Ukraine, and Chancellor Scholz doesn't want to risk Bundeswehr troops being killed.

    • @7171jay
      @7171jay 16 дней назад

      ​@@andyl8055 It sounds like you don't have Scholtz's argument quite right. Scholtz isn't talking about boots on the ground as in German soldiers on the front lines but support troops to control Ukraine's use of the Taurus missiles.
      Honestly Scholtz's argument is pretty much circular: Ukraine can't have the Taurus because there would have to be Germans along with and German advisors can't be in Ukraine when in reality Ukraine could operate the Taurus without German advisors.
      What Scholtz is afraid of is the Taurus missiles being used to take down the Kerch bridge because it is the most effective western missile for the job and he fears Putin who would certainly blame Germany for taking down his precious bridge if the Taurus was used for that. purpose. The sticking point is that the Kerch bridge is questionable whether it is part of Crimea which makes it a valid target for western weapons or part of Russia which would mean it is not. As it is connected to Crimea which is part of Ukraine I'm sure the Ukrainian military would see the bridge as a valid target acceptable to use western weapons on and even the U.S. and other allies might as well. Scholtz is attempting to avoid the entire issue by simply not allowing Ukraine to have the Taurus.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад +1

      You obviously haven't been following this conflict at all

    • @niburu1508
      @niburu1508 15 дней назад

      What a pile of 🗣💩- this has been going on for 10 years - if you are unaware of that - stop talking

    • @davidelliott5843
      @davidelliott5843 15 дней назад +1

      Germany insisting that German missiles need German troops to deploy is an insult to the most efficient and intelligent troops in the world.

  • @jjw1987
    @jjw1987 16 дней назад +60

    Is this Chamberlains grandson? Ukraine have said they want to liberate their land, letting Russia keep the occupied territories is a victory for Russia and a guaranteed way to ensure they will come back for the rest at a later date once they’ve regrouped and built up more military capabilities. The western economies dwarf Russia 25 to 1, victory is possible only with political will to give Ukraine weapons, and lots of them. Russia has more reason to leave than Ukraine does, they are fighting a foreign war whereas Ukraine is defending the homeland.

    • @user-tt6il2up4o
      @user-tt6il2up4o 16 дней назад

      The west is fianancially on its knees, it’s so broke the only way forward is to steal Russian cash, Russia has more cash than all the eu put together and Russia is unlike the west not borrowing money like drunken fools.
      Your comment on economy size is ignorant.
      The real sign is purchasing power parity.
      Eg a 105mm shell in the us will cost 50-100 times more than in Russia, this is not a sign of a good economy, Russia is a low cost country.

    • @taylorarnold5311
      @taylorarnold5311 16 дней назад +5

      Ya I hate when people say we're giving Ukraine way to much money. No we're not giving them enough. The 61 billion dollar aid bill from the US is only 0.3 percent of its gdp. If we really want Ukraine to beat Russia we have to up the anty and give them hundreds of billions of dollars. What we give them is to slow and not enough. Russia is spending 100 billion this year. What we give will help ukraine match Russia but imo it won't help them totally beat the Russians. Ukraine needs air power. If they controlled the skys things would be much different.

    • @braxxian
      @braxxian 16 дней назад +4

      The reason Russia invaded Ukraine is simple. Russia will never allow NATO to be right in its border. It’s nit hard to understand.

    • @macmcleod1188
      @macmcleod1188 16 дней назад +1

      Over the last decade historians have realized that Chamberlain was actually playing a deep game of appeasing while he rebuilt Britain's military industrial complex.
      If he had confronted Germany back in 34ish then Britain would have simply lost as it had no military to speak of due to war fatigue from World War i.
      While talking appeasement, he was plowing huge amounts of money into building up the British military again.
      So this guy is basically a Russian agent who's completely out of touch with what Ukraine wants.

    • @Drone_Depopulation_Gaming
      @Drone_Depopulation_Gaming 16 дней назад

      @@braxxian ok russian troll, russia is expanding this is not about nato nice propaganda from 10 years ago you guys are easy to spot.

  • @ginojaco
    @ginojaco 16 дней назад +75

    Hmm... Mr Binyon is still following the Moscow line at every possible opportunity; fortunately for us we know he has a record of this and so can write of his doom-mongering for what it is.

    • @srhmcs1
      @srhmcs1 16 дней назад

      Unbelievable he legitimizes the propoganda that the people of Donbas were persecuted by the "Kiev" government. The only reasons I've heard from Ukranian traitors for wishing to be independent or russian is they believed they would recieve a larger pension from russia than they did in Ukraine, and the anger felt towards Ukraine for abandoning the russian Victory Day drinking parties and parades. I heard one ordinary, if ambitious, lady talk about her belief that once Russia destroyed her home it would turn around and gift her with a nice apartment in Crimea, and perhaps she could even get away with collecting a pension from both Russia and Ukraine. And then once her old apartment was rebuilt by whichever country ended up with the territory, she could sell it! I wonder what she ended up with in the end.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад

      But he isn't 'following the Moscow line'. If he was he would have pointed to the demonstrable fact that China is not withdrawing its support.

    • @leetommerson639
      @leetommerson639 15 дней назад +1

      If he was following “the Moscow line” he wouldn’t be appearing on this channel.
      You are isolating yourself from all information you don’t like.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад

      @@leetommerson639 Completely agree. Do you think that maybe they've got two implicit propaganda suggestions to infiltrate into as many as they can: 1/ That China is withdrawing its support from Russia, a provably false statement; and 2/ That our leaders in the collective west are still hankering after that 'ceasefire' or 'conflict freeze' idea, the one floated months ago by, e.g. Richard Haas, the idea being to have a pause in which the west can re-arm itself, and then they can get the ball rolling all over again?

    • @ginojaco
      @ginojaco 15 дней назад

      @@robertatkins9419 Do some homework on his commentary since day one...

  • @bradburke8232
    @bradburke8232 16 дней назад +14

    13:22 Soviets, not necessarily "Russians" and the sad reality is some of those Soviets were Ukrainian. I understand Germany's war guilt but at times it seems misguided and it makes it that much worse that their (and our collective) inaction could lead to the next big one which if you think they have war guilt now, imagine how much they'd have if they played a role even accidentally in ushering in a new global war seems how we have them to thank for the last two.

    • @niburu1508
      @niburu1508 15 дней назад +1

      @brad - You appear to be determined to have a nuclear war in Europe - with little Chernobyl’s in every country or one large one in several countries. Which are you going for? Russia apparently has the most nuclear weapons and had indicated on several occasions that it is not interested in your warmongering but still you persist. Do you imagine you are out of the range or something? Keep pushing I’m sure you will get your wish.

    • @Mens_Room_Tampon_Peddler
      @Mens_Room_Tampon_Peddler 13 дней назад +1

      @@niburu1508 9/10th's of Russia's nuclear arsenal is stockpiled from the soviet era. they have no way to deploy it. what good is that? You need to learn what's up, pal.

    • @majorrgeek
      @majorrgeek 10 дней назад

      @@niburu1508 - the problem facing Putin is that he has found out the hard way that his country military is completely not up to the level he thought it was and cannot even take Ukraine even though he is surrounded by nuke arsenal, you have to remember this arsenal is mostly useless ex Soviet junk - he should be aware by now if he uses nukes Russia will suffer worse than any other country - this is fact, in fact I would take Putin's nuclear threats seriously - his threats usher the west for a first strike against Russia

  • @govinda102000
    @govinda102000 16 дней назад +91

    Tell you who else is not happy with this war and Putler. The Russian Navy and Russian AF.

    • @user-eq8or9tf9n
      @user-eq8or9tf9n 16 дней назад +10

      Bahahaha 😂😂😂😂😂do you still breastfeed😂😂SlavaRossiya iz Shotlandii,,🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇷🇺🤙God bless Putin and Russia from Scotland

    • @jcoker423
      @jcoker423 16 дней назад +23

      @@user-eq8or9tf9n haha..... why aren't you back home in the Putinkim Army?

    • @J7463kl3
      @J7463kl3 16 дней назад

      Go home , in your favorite arny😅😅​@@user-eq8or9tf9n

    • @govinda102000
      @govinda102000 16 дней назад +12

      @@user-eq8or9tf9n From Scotland? You are living in a democratic and free country. Some day perhaps Russia will be free from your putler and maybe you will return to do some good in Russia instead of receiving government assistance from Scotland.

    • @fnmkd3142
      @fnmkd3142 16 дней назад +6

      @@govinda102000 He`s a bot

  • @camrenwick
    @camrenwick 16 дней назад +5

    Shame on the US Republican congress who delayed the aid package, which cost the lives of so many Ukrainians. Shame

  • @jamesmaina1698
    @jamesmaina1698 16 дней назад +32

    Your guest is really making very broad sweeping statements which am not sure are basefd on facts.

    • @user-tt6il2up4o
      @user-tt6il2up4o 16 дней назад +1

      Like all on this channel it’s utter tripe, it’s comedy gold.

    • @peetky8645
      @peetky8645 16 дней назад

      or reality unless he can clone young men or make battle robots.

    • @mrglide7078
      @mrglide7078 16 дней назад +1

      @@user-tt6il2up4o Yet here you are...

    • @gorantomic7150
      @gorantomic7150 12 дней назад

      Actually it's much worse

  • @Mythos131
    @Mythos131 16 дней назад +66

    This guy is clueless.

    • @johnadam2885
      @johnadam2885 16 дней назад +4

      Why, because he is not giving the fantasy you want to hear on Ukrainian victory ?

    • @Mythos131
      @Mythos131 16 дней назад +13

      @@johnadam2885 No, because he assumes Ukraine wants a ceasefire now. Ukraine certainly doesn't want a ceasefire until Russia is driving out of their lands.

    • @federicosantoro7100
      @federicosantoro7100 16 дней назад

      Chinese are perfectly happy with the west giving weapons and spending billions while thr conflict inevitably create division in their society. Only guys that knows what they are talking about in this podcast are the generals

    • @mnoot7209
      @mnoot7209 16 дней назад +7

      ​@@johnadam2885 Troll Alert! 💩

    • @vipulgupta
      @vipulgupta 16 дней назад

      @@Mythos131 Because that's what the clown tells you, the implant of the West? 🤣 On the contrary the reality is that Ukrainians want the war mongering NATO out of Ukraine which has led to such destruction of Ukraine and Ukraine losing so much of land.

  • @TauNomm
    @TauNomm 16 дней назад +30

    We can all be supporters of Ukraine. For example, by donating to United24 which funds important drone programmes.

    • @dimas3829
      @dimas3829 15 дней назад

      yes, you could be ghouls supporting modern day Ukrainian nazis. Why would you, though?

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад +1

      But what you advocate - more arms supplies - is precisely the opposite of 'support'.

    • @TauNomm
      @TauNomm 11 дней назад +1

      @@robertatkins9419 I also support Ukraine in terms of humanitarian aid. But this alone won't help them to fend off being conquered.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 6 дней назад

      @@TauNomm They're not being 'conquered'. You need to change your perspective in order to understand what Russia is doing and why it is doing it. It is not about Russia 'conquering' anyone. It is about@ 1/ Stopping NATO expansion into Ukraine; and 2/ Ensuring the security of the people of Donbass.

    • @TauNomm
      @TauNomm 5 дней назад

      @@robertatkins9419 That's exactly the russian propaganda lies..

  • @diegoflores9237
    @diegoflores9237 16 дней назад +5

    Times radio is my favorite comedy show

  • @michaelmullins3396
    @michaelmullins3396 16 дней назад +26

    Will the real lord haw haw please stand up.

    • @Dark_Bandon
      @Dark_Bandon 16 дней назад +2

      Soloyvov gets to his feet.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад +1

      That's would be Michael Clarke.

    • @michaelmullins3396
      @michaelmullins3396 15 дней назад

      @@robertatkins9419I think this guy would give Michael Clarke a good run for his money . Now days with modern western technology lord haw haw can be cloned successfully, back in the days there was only one lord Haw haw . Let alone a KATE haw haw.

  • @yurilytviak9066
    @yurilytviak9066 16 дней назад +8

    This is a very russophilic interpretation ; in care of one who knows just enough to shade a narrative to his liking . Granting Crimea to rusha in ‘14 led directly to the current mess

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад

      No one 'granted' Crimea to Russia. The fact that you have to lie means there is no substance whatever in what you say.

    • @cap3001
      @cap3001 12 дней назад

      @@robertatkins9419 Actually it was "granted" by default timidness of Obama. That and the "red line" in Syria were his low points.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 6 дней назад

      @@cap3001 Actually, nothing was 'granted', and nothing needed needed to be 'granted'.

  • @paddyneville1535
    @paddyneville1535 16 дней назад +23

    I say old boy you're a tad wrong you underestimate Ukraine.

  • @supernoodles91
    @supernoodles91 16 дней назад +20

    The Tories criticise Labour for not saying they would commit to maintaining the uplift from 2.3% of GDP to 2.5%. Under Labour it was 2.7%. As for recruitment Tories do what Tories do. Outsource recruitment to the private sector, taking money from the public purse because 'the private sector are better equipped'.......right. Look at energy, at water, at prisons etc. If they thought they could they'd privatise the police, the fire service, the ambulance service.......even oxygen if they could!

    • @sshumkaer
      @sshumkaer 16 дней назад +1

      No one in the EU takes defense seriously.
      Japan is an example of someone taking defense seriously. With a 5 year budget moving up to $300 billion dollars.
      Every power house EU country needs that.

    • @bushpocket8619
      @bushpocket8619 16 дней назад +4

      @@sshumkaer Russia's border countries understand the importance of adequate defense.

    • @sshumkaer
      @sshumkaer 16 дней назад +1

      @bushpocket8619 that's why I said the EU power countries not Poland.

    • @peetky8645
      @peetky8645 16 дней назад

      in the 80's GB spent 4.5% gdp on the military.

    • @bushpocket8619
      @bushpocket8619 14 дней назад

      @@peetky8645 You should take care of the old conscripts and take them back into service if they want. In addition, young people must complete mandatory military service.

  • @chisimdibreakthrough1901
    @chisimdibreakthrough1901 16 дней назад +11

    These British arm-chair analysts keep making a mockery of themselves. They will to live in an alternate reality

    • @niburu1508
      @niburu1508 15 дней назад

      The English don’t know whether to take food to starving Palestinians and run the risk of being killed by their friends the Zionists ( neo Nazis?). Or run the risk of being killed in Ukraine. They finance and support the “most corrupt country in aEurope” and have sent one of their Royals to glad hand the leader.

    • @Mens_Room_Tampon_Peddler
      @Mens_Room_Tampon_Peddler 13 дней назад

      sure bot.

  • @VsevolodSidorenko
    @VsevolodSidorenko 16 дней назад +22

    ceasefire will happen when poopin withdraws his troops to 1991 borders

  • @mesere7
    @mesere7 16 дней назад +5

    Unbelievable how this guy is peddling some Kremlin talking points, he spent too much time in Russia ...

    • @gorantomic7150
      @gorantomic7150 12 дней назад

      Yep.... situation is much worse for Kiev globalist forces

  • @JaneSoole
    @JaneSoole 16 дней назад +11

    The sound is very low again - I don't THINK it is my ears. Today you are both too quiet ! Could you have a check on it please?

    • @edh8827
      @edh8827 16 дней назад +1

      It is very low for a mobile device it's only -37LUFS. -23 is on the low side for a mobile device.

    • @y2kbug58
      @y2kbug58 13 дней назад

      I found this too so listened on headphones

  • @timothyevans5557
    @timothyevans5557 16 дней назад +47

    Shameful click bait.

    • @braxxian
      @braxxian 16 дней назад

      It’s TR. And that means propaganda.

  • @Smile-qc9dw
    @Smile-qc9dw 16 дней назад +9

    Action is better than words, China should stop supporting Putin instead of reconcile in wordson behalf😅

    • @trogdortpennypacker6160
      @trogdortpennypacker6160 16 дней назад

      Why would they stop supporting this war? It's deindustrializing Europe and draining US arms. They get added bonus of cheap resources from Russia and gain a further competitive advantage. Extra bonus that Russia can only buy Chinese products and not European. China is crushing it with this war and I doubt they ever want it to end.

    • @neolithictransitrevolution427
      @neolithictransitrevolution427 16 дней назад +1

      China supports NK though. It doesn't do it because it likes the countries, it just won't allow a western aligned government on its border. So it supports Russia out of fear of a Western style government.

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 16 дней назад

      You should thank China for the level of support it has given Russia, because the country with more manufacturing volume than rest of the world combined directly provide Russia with weapons, they'd cruise all the way to London.

  • @iainamckenzie
    @iainamckenzie 15 дней назад +1

    Thnak you Michael Binyon, it is refreshing to hear a discussion about the war in Ukraine without the usual bias that we get on this channel.

  • @peteneville698
    @peteneville698 16 дней назад +7

    Why are these videos always so quiet? This one is especially bad.

  • @oeokosko
    @oeokosko 16 дней назад +23

    The new Lord Haw Haw

  • @lostpianist
    @lostpianist 16 дней назад +3

    Dark time in a dark world

    • @lqr824
      @lqr824 15 дней назад

      This guest is like a paid propagandist for Putin. It's not that dark. Even if the US re-elects Trump, the EU can easily double its aid to Ukraine to take up the slack. France hasn't been doing its share so far but Macron's talking of French boots on the ground. That'd be welcome.

  • @jeremyallard7015
    @jeremyallard7015 16 дней назад +3

    As an ex Defence worker. We need a new type of Government in the UK who properly understands Lean Six Sigma, if you implement this Technique within the Treasury. It would be of benefit to the TAX Payer. A lot of Treasury Funded Companies use this methodology, especially in Defence Procurement. You have to buy goods that are fit for purpose. LSS is a good way of minimising waste. We should not have Ministers who don't understand modern day methods and progress or Assurance and Quality Assurance issues, or simple Business Management. I have personally seen the waste going on at Commons events, all be it a few years ago. We also need to RE-JOIN EUROPE to bolster our economy.

  • @Travis_22
    @Travis_22 16 дней назад +28

    I'm pro Ukraine, but this is shameless bs.

    • @mattgrant9479
      @mattgrant9479 16 дней назад +1

      But you're not you are a russian bot

  • @sanataj
    @sanataj 16 дней назад +12

    Very faint audio, please try to make it much louder. Thank you.

  • @monabear7287
    @monabear7287 16 дней назад +10

    China's international reputation is taking a hit bc of how theyve played both sides and refused to lead. We here in the US dropped the ball but China couldnt pick it up.

    • @charlesburgoyne-probyn6044
      @charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 16 дней назад +3

      China has its own agenda in east Asia

    • @diegoflores9237
      @diegoflores9237 16 дней назад

      Not really. Most of the world continues having a good relationship with Russia. Living in fantasy land isn't going to help you. Remember when you people claimed Ukraine was winning? You said it so many times you came to believe it. Lying to yourself isn't going to help you. China is on the right side, the side of most of the world

    • @roycrosby4941
      @roycrosby4941 16 дней назад

      China's international reputation? China is the big winner in this war. They curry favor by supporting Russia, while the U.S. and Europe weaken themselves economically and militarily.

    • @Mens_Room_Tampon_Peddler
      @Mens_Room_Tampon_Peddler 13 дней назад

      LOL, "china international reputation" .. that's a good one. 😂

  • @paulyoung4422
    @paulyoung4422 16 дней назад +30

    Hello Mr Chamberlain.

  • @kevinmahoney9884
    @kevinmahoney9884 16 дней назад +2

    so FINALLY the US comes through. Why didn’t the UK step up and provide the equivalent amount of aid?

    • @MegaFarah78
      @MegaFarah78 16 дней назад

      Ha ha who trust any Anglo Saxon regime

    • @willdon.1279
      @willdon.1279 12 дней назад +1

      Kevin - it's not a simple tap to turn off and on. Particularly modern weapons in large quantities. Putin spent 10 years planning, storing for this. The West didn't think he would be so crazy.

  • @seasorb
    @seasorb 16 дней назад +42

    The USA signed the Budapest Memorandum. They have a responsibility. Nothing to do with Europe of Nato whatsoever.

    • @boota1979
      @boota1979 16 дней назад +8

      @seasorb Where do you get your info from?
      The three memoranda were originally signed by three nuclear powers: Russia, the United States and the United Kingdom. The US and UK are in NATO and are both among the 12 founding members.
      China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents.

    • @trogdortpennypacker6160
      @trogdortpennypacker6160 16 дней назад +2

      They have no responsibilities, hence why they used a memorandum instead of a treaty. It was deliberately chosen to be a memo because they never wanted to have such responsibilities.

    • @VINLAND_777
      @VINLAND_777 16 дней назад +8

      @@trogdortpennypacker6160You should then read or re-read the whole text and addendum of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum plus the transcripts of the meetings and negotiations. Then we can talk again how and why the countries which signed this memorandum do cary some responsibility. Everything else are just historically false and misleading claims.

    • @solconcordia4315
      @solconcordia4315 16 дней назад

      ​@@trogdortpennypacker6160
      The U.S.A. with our nearly divided Congress cannot really ratify any treaty. There are many extremely important de facto treaties concerning the well-being of the entire world which haven't been ratified by our divided Congress. Despite their not being ratified, all presidents thereafter observed them so it has been pretty much a completely moot issue.
      Of course, I'm extremely concerned with the Muscovy gangsters such as MTG, DJT, AA988, and Winnie the Pooh reneging on de facto treaty responsibilities. These are all *TRAITORS* to humanity.

    • @monabear7287
      @monabear7287 16 дней назад +10

      ​@@VINLAND_777Yes, you are correct. The US PROMISED a defense if they were attacked in exchange for giving up their nukes- PERIOD.

  • @Bar-Lord
    @Bar-Lord 16 дней назад +17

    If they get them that far, Putin can just leave. If he comes to the table, he’s desperate.

    • @pauldean8638
      @pauldean8638 16 дней назад +1

      Ha ha ha ha

    • @Bar-Lord
      @Bar-Lord 16 дней назад +1

      @@pauldean8638Is that somehow meant to be insulting? If so, wow.

    • @pauldean8638
      @pauldean8638 16 дней назад +1

      @@Bar-Lord learn to cope better about losing

    • @pauldean8638
      @pauldean8638 16 дней назад

      @@Bar-Lord I’ll revisit you tomorrow and we can discuss what Russia acquired in 24 hours the battle front is moving so fast west

    • @erikh.1883
      @erikh.1883 16 дней назад +2

      @@pauldean8638 Your definition of fast is interesting. They were faster and still FAILED when the greatest support Ukraine got were a couple old German helmets. 😂 THIS is not fast hahaha.

  • @user-vb3zx9ht3e
    @user-vb3zx9ht3e 16 дней назад +1

    Blessings & Godspeed to Ukraine 🇺🇦 and those with Ukraine… 🇺🇸♾️😎 It’s the beginning to Peace on Earth…

  • @gasman6163
    @gasman6163 16 дней назад +24

    more chance of the pope having triplets

  • @marktrotter8971
    @marktrotter8971 16 дней назад +26

    The only ceasefire available involves full russian withdrawal from Ukraine first - and that isn't going to happen this year. Maybe in 2025 - depends on the state of the Russian economy.

    • @SS-yt2sq
      @SS-yt2sq 16 дней назад +3

      nope. it was reported recently that rooskie economny has switched to war footing and growth will be nearly double that of 2023. sad but true

    • @bushpocket8619
      @bushpocket8619 16 дней назад

      There is no way a ceasefire will work for the Ukrainians !

    • @taylorarnold5311
      @taylorarnold5311 16 дней назад

      ​@@SS-yt2sqbro you can't believe what Russia tells you. The Russian economy is hurting. Where does this supposed growth info come from ? Obviously the Russians. Watch inside Russia he'll give you the truth. Russia is like the Titanic, their slowly sinking. Might take a while but imo Russia will collapse sooner or later. We just need to put more and more pressure on russia and help Ukraine all the way.

    • @miguelgameiro8063
      @miguelgameiro8063 16 дней назад

      So long their piggy bank allows the war will go on ironically enough when Ucraine started hitting vital refineries that would help limit Russian capacity they got heat from their allies

    • @foilhat1138
      @foilhat1138 16 дней назад +4

      @@SS-yt2sq That's not how a war economy works bud, its like setting your house on fire and boasting about how warm you are.

  • @markdeckard7651
    @markdeckard7651 16 дней назад +4

    Remove the distinguished British accent, and Mr. Binyon is "homeless man talking to telephone pole" level of coherence.

  • @gregoryadair3223
    @gregoryadair3223 16 дней назад +1

    Ukraine is not asking for Taurus missiles for strikes inside Russia.

  • @gerryhouska2859
    @gerryhouska2859 16 дней назад +12

    The world is a wonderful place, too bad this guest knows little history. Appeasement to thugs never works.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад

      And too bad you suffer from the same lack of knowledge, otherwise you'd realize that that's the lesson Russia is teaching the collective thugs of the west.

  • @hhjj6752
    @hhjj6752 16 дней назад +6

    Times Radio...can you turn the sound up please...It is not unusual that I can't hear your vids on my laptop. Ta

  • @mattgrant9479
    @mattgrant9479 16 дней назад +39

    So many Russian bots on here yet again

    • @Dark_Bandon
      @Dark_Bandon 16 дней назад +7

      Behind every Russian bot stands a Russian draft dodger.

    • @braxxian
      @braxxian 16 дней назад

      So anyone who doesn’t agree with you is a Russian bot?. Your eyes are closed, that’s why your loosing.

    • @rmdomainer9042
      @rmdomainer9042 16 дней назад +1

      YT should do something about them.

    • @TonyM540
      @TonyM540 16 дней назад +2

      Report them

    • @diegoflores9237
      @diegoflores9237 16 дней назад +2

      What kind of bot are you?

  • @user-ep3ed5jd7q
    @user-ep3ed5jd7q 16 дней назад

    Times Radio, you’re doing fabulous interview-reporting. Thank you always.

  • @philiptilden2318
    @philiptilden2318 16 дней назад +7

    This man is a soft Kremlin stooge. In December 1991 both Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts voted 83% for Ukrainian independence. Crimea voted 53% for Ukrainian independence and 57% in Sebastopol. It is clear that Crimea and the other occupied territories wanted overwhelmingly to be Ukrainian and there is no evidence to suggest that that has changed. In fact, since Donbas men have been conscripted and sent to die in their tens of thousands in the war, they are probably as sick of the bloody Russians as the rest of Ukraine.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад

      Yet another cheap trash-taking LIAR

    • @irresistablejewel
      @irresistablejewel 13 дней назад

      There is ample evidence that things have changed since Ukraine became an independent country in 1994. In 2014 after an armed overthrow government: three regions voted for independence (from Ukraine) and in a choice between Ukraine and Russia (no independence option) Crimea voted to (re)join Russia. After an eight year civil war; Russia "recognised" the 2014 independence referendums, then occupied them (in 2022) and the three regions subsequently voted to (re)join Russia.
      As for the commentator, he doesn't seem to realize it was Boris Johnson of the UK (probably acting on American orders) that blocked peace negotiations (in Turkey), that led to the "special military operation" and it won't matter to Russia what the Western media want: the agreement in 2014 between Russia and Ukraine was, neutrality or war (and that's their business). America and the EU have "invested" billions in Ukraine; that put Ukrainian neutrality in doubt, so Russia went to war.
      These Eastern regional referendums have all been overwhelmingly in favor of leaving Ukraine; so the media here claim they were rigged, I tend to doubt that. Ukraine went bankrupt.
      I don't think the man is a Kremlin stooge; he sounds (to me) like someone who hasn't a clue and if what's left of Ukraine isn't neutral, it's war. Russia were quite clear about this btw.
      While if Ukraine does declare neutrality, all these foreign corporations that took control of agriculture and a gas-pipeline lose... for America it's about money (it always is...). Roll on WW3.

  • @SurprisedSnowyOwl-jf5ol
    @SurprisedSnowyOwl-jf5ol 16 дней назад +4

    Russia could end this war by simply move all its troops back to their homeland and getting out of a sovereign country

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад +1

      And all you can do is spout a cheap western propaganda talking point

    • @ConnorJane
      @ConnorJane 15 дней назад +1

      And you could also try and find Ukraine on the map.

    • @jacksmith-mu3ee
      @jacksmith-mu3ee 14 дней назад

      Same for taiwan . Which is not a country

  • @stmaui6973
    @stmaui6973 15 дней назад

    Hi James! Always excellent work!

  • @platolover6377
    @platolover6377 16 дней назад +1

    Ukr should have drafted down to 21 or 22 like all other countries RIGHT FROM the beginning. They they would have had trained masses to rotate. I was shocked to read a month or so ago that 25 was the min age.

  • @YouMessiah
    @YouMessiah 16 дней назад +8

    Please increase your volume, thank you.

  • @rockdog2843
    @rockdog2843 16 дней назад +3

    Ukraine could win this war if they had all the weapons and ammo they need and not have to wait on more. Also they will need more troops drafted. Those troops fighting are worn out and burnt out. They need fresh young troops and lots of them to win.

    • @kingnaz313
      @kingnaz313 16 дней назад

      They need 15-20 nukes

    • @ConnorJane
      @ConnorJane 16 дней назад

      They had 200 billion at 2021 when they wanted to attack Russia. Too bad so sad.

  • @brianflynn5491
    @brianflynn5491 16 дней назад +1

    No that’s showing Russia you gave up, take all your land back

  • @soton5teve
    @soton5teve 15 дней назад +2

    Where has china said their withdrawing support?

  • @billrobinson5301
    @billrobinson5301 16 дней назад +3

    Again, ongoing volume issues with panelists!

    • @latscott
      @latscott 16 дней назад +2

      They're having to do Pod-casts in his mum's broom cupboard... Amateurs!

  • @ReallyGoodBadBoy
    @ReallyGoodBadBoy 16 дней назад +4

    This week I have heard the exact opposite, that China has ramped up supplying Russia with resources and technology for the war effort more than ever.

    • @Mens_Room_Tampon_Peddler
      @Mens_Room_Tampon_Peddler 13 дней назад +1

      You heard that from Xi Jinping himself, I'm sure. You're so in the know, worldly man.

  • @antispindr8613
    @antispindr8613 16 дней назад +1

    If the Ukrainian Army is not in real trouble, then why has our media, here in the UK, stopped reporting events on the battle front? So, is not good way to deflect attention from unwelcome news to send a minor royal on a PR visit?

  • @dutchy661
    @dutchy661 16 дней назад +1

    On a side note, guys and girls of Telegraph editing, could you please check your sound levels?
    I had the same problem listening to Kate the other day, your volume on the video's is way to low!

  • @SamPKBoo
    @SamPKBoo 16 дней назад +12

    Ukraine should get Crimea back. If we start reneging on treaties, is the UK going to give back Gibraltar to Spain? It actually should lol

    • @jcoker423
      @jcoker423 16 дней назад

      Ask the Crimeans and Gibraltans.

    • @SamPKBoo
      @SamPKBoo 16 дней назад +1

      @@jcoker423 ah yes, because referendums are so objective and not peddle lies right? #brexit #borisjohnsonlies

    • @ak5659
      @ak5659 16 дней назад +2

      My understanding is that 70+% of Crimeans voted to stay part of Ukraine simply because they believed Ukraine 's economy would be better long term and they'd benefit from it.

    • @jcoker423
      @jcoker423 15 дней назад

      @@SamPKBoo The only people who don't like referendums are the elites. Do you really think lies swayed Brexit?
      I also suggest a referendum in HK and Taiwan, about being part of China.

    • @lqr824
      @lqr824 15 дней назад

      Gibraltar was actually never part of Spain. It was part of a kingdom that has since disappeared, but the Spanish flag has not flown there ever in history even for a day.

  • @sanataj
    @sanataj 16 дней назад +4

    I don't know who the guest is, but I am not sure that Times Radio is a very accurate reporting service.

  • @eric78730
    @eric78730 10 дней назад

    Why not first secure the US boarder? That was a lost opportunity.

  • @savaisakovic3857
    @savaisakovic3857 15 дней назад

    My admiration goes to Times Radio. It's not easy to produce such a news for as long...

  • @Gayzenon
    @Gayzenon 16 дней назад +7

    ❤Ukrainian ❤

  • @sophrapsune
    @sophrapsune 16 дней назад +3

    “They’re not going to get the Russians out of Crimea”, yet the Black Sea Fleet has already left.

    • @ConnorJane
      @ConnorJane 16 дней назад

      No, no it didn't.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад

      But the Black Sea Fleet hasn't left. And you posses not a single jot of sophrosune.

  • @user-xw4gr9kn8n
    @user-xw4gr9kn8n 16 дней назад +2

    Ceasefire? I've talked to morons about this conflict who demonstrated better sense than that. Ukraine doesn't want a ceasefire. Ukraine uncompromisingly wants Russia the phuque off their turf. Is there something about that you can't understand, Mike?

    • @ConnorJane
      @ConnorJane 16 дней назад

      So Ukraine will stop existing. This what happens when some country only exists to get payed for supplying cannon fodder for NATO.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад

      And Russia too has zero desire or intention of a ceasefire. But, contrary to what you say, the vast majority of ordinary Ukrainians actually do want a ceasefire, its only their psychopathic leaders who don't. Is there something about that you can't understand?

  • @stephenlauret132
    @stephenlauret132 15 дней назад +1

    Please fix the quality and volume level of the audio of these videos!

  • @kevinchen7403
    @kevinchen7403 16 дней назад +3

    Volume is so low on the studio end.

  • @michaelmullins3396
    @michaelmullins3396 16 дней назад +6

    Michael Clark revision 2

  • @kostaspamp
    @kostaspamp 15 дней назад +1

    Dear times radio, I like your content but, please stop with the flashbacks before the official video start at 0:42. I always have to skip that part. Thumbs up to make them change their editing

  • @RichardTaylor1630
    @RichardTaylor1630 16 дней назад +2

    Not at all impressed with your guest. Kent has been part of England (Wessex/Mercia) for 1338 years, so it would not much of a stretch to say that Kent has "always" been part of England. But in that same 1338 years, Crimea has been under ruzzian dominion for only 171 years (1783-1954). Thus, Mr. Binyon is merely displaying his ignorance when he says that Ukraine has "always" been part of ruzzia.
    Also, you shouldn't gain the right of control over an area as the result of a genocide against it's longtime inhabitants, in this case the Crimean Tatars. Stalin shipped substantially all of them off to Uzbekistan and Siberia, with many thousands dying en route or forced onto barges and dumped into the Black Sea.
    That crime alone should compel the civilized world to reject Putler's belated claim of any right to control Crimea.

  • @martinpankhurst2683
    @martinpankhurst2683 16 дней назад +3

    Shame on you Mr binyon

  • @TheMrCougarful
    @TheMrCougarful 16 дней назад +3

    Donald Trump suddenly allowing aid for Ukraine is a genuine mystery. I have yet to hear a plausible explanation. It was completely off-brand for him to do that.

    • @dj_cakes
      @dj_cakes 16 дней назад

      He's been told by people much more serious and powerful than himself that this is how its going to be. President or not, Donald Dump DOES NOT and WILL NEVER decide US foreign policy.

    • @15thga87
      @15thga87 16 дней назад +1

      Trump was the first to send Ukraine lethal aid. The Obama/Biden administration gave them blankets and mre's.

    • @marktrotter8971
      @marktrotter8971 16 дней назад +4

      Trump didn't. Mike Johnson realised that he didn't want to be the fall guy if Ukraine lost.

    • @urbanarmory
      @urbanarmory 16 дней назад +3

      ​@@marktrotter8971no, he cleared it with Trump and Trump didn't try to speak against it either. The basic understanding at this point is that Trump didn't want Ukraine to actually be beaten by Russia at this point. He wants to be a "peacemaker", but that requires Ukraine sticking arounf

    • @TheMrCougarful
      @TheMrCougarful 16 дней назад

      @@urbanarmory Trump manipulating the conflict so he can win a Novel Prize like Obama does make sense. Totally on brand for DT.

  • @gherkamum
    @gherkamum 15 дней назад +1

    China has made a good move.....

  • @ingoditrust7784
    @ingoditrust7784 16 дней назад +2

    Michael Johnson is a monster. He has succeeded in giving RuZZia a huge advantage and is thus responsible for many deaths and immense suffering. If he were a true believer he would know what that implies for his own eternity.

    • @robertatkins9419
      @robertatkins9419 15 дней назад +1

      And this comment of yours makes YOU the monster

  • @thiefsleef6752
    @thiefsleef6752 16 дней назад +8

    China not sending anymore gulf carts won’t force Putin into a ceasefire 😂. You guys are hilarious

    • @jcoker423
      @jcoker423 16 дней назад

      500k Russian men wont be having any children..... the Chinese will take over Siberia

  • @joshuaholder6818
    @joshuaholder6818 16 дней назад +5

    Why can’t Europe help Ukraine as much as America especially since it’s in their backyard?

  • @-GeordieDan-
    @-GeordieDan- 13 дней назад

    Micky here, keeps flipflopping.

  • @norwegianzound
    @norwegianzound 15 дней назад

    Build a great big aircraft carrier and then dont have any planes to land on them. Can the Brits do anything right? How did they conquer an empire? Astounding

  • @mrjerzheel
    @mrjerzheel 16 дней назад +9

    More delusion from Times

  • @anthonyedwards7019
    @anthonyedwards7019 16 дней назад +4

    Please check your sound levels, can hardly hear you.

  • @brianquinn6014
    @brianquinn6014 13 дней назад

    Now is now,forget about the past.

  • @richardbayer5702
    @richardbayer5702 16 дней назад +1

    The munitions are there from Germany and Poland. It's a question of logistics now.

  • @Menelvagorothar
    @Menelvagorothar 16 дней назад +4

    Crimea was not "always" Russian. It was annexed in 1783, and in 1944 they deported most of the native population to complete the russification. Crimea is a russian colony.

  • @kravchuk007
    @kravchuk007 16 дней назад +3

    Crimea WAS ALWAYS RUSSIAN ??? This man needs some education ...Sorry....

    • @Kalendir
      @Kalendir 16 дней назад

      Well, the only other side who could claim rights to it is Turkey, but as far as I know, they're not interested. So yeah, it's ours.

    • @kravchuk007
      @kravchuk007 16 дней назад +1

      @@Kalendir No it was never Turkish , it always been Crimean Kingdom , crimian tatars , they were genocided by rusia , 10 million crimean tartar outside of Crimea , 7 million in Turkey

    • @VINLAND_777
      @VINLAND_777 15 дней назад +1

      @@Kalendir Crimea never in human history rightfully belonged to the Russian Federation. Historical facts are what matters, not some ideological claims and opinions.

    • @Kalendir
      @Kalendir 14 дней назад

      @@VINLAND_777 Here's a historical fact then: it belongs to us now, and will stay that way. Unless, of course, you want to come and take it back? C'mon, try it.

  • @tubistify
    @tubistify 15 дней назад

    CO2 and pollution are completely different. Confusing the two is all too common among many.

  • @marisabenson1222
    @marisabenson1222 16 дней назад +2

    Maybe this gentleman should stick to being a book critic. I checked his bio and he doesnt seem to have any depth of knowledge except that he was a journalist for the BBC in moscow and for Times in carious countries. So it's really just another opinion of a bystander with their own particular bias and some of that is no doubt influenced by his age.
    Unfortunately when one begins to understand the putin regime and what it is and how it operates then no credibility can be given to anything putin says or does.
    We see putin for who he is and we understand why he must be stopped and not allowed to achieve anynof his goals in Ukraine.

  • @ahmmustafakamal696
    @ahmmustafakamal696 16 дней назад +5

    Is this guy in a pay roll of the British/ US military industrial complex?

    • @jjw1987
      @jjw1987 16 дней назад +3

      Are you on the kremlins troll network?

  • @meridien52681
    @meridien52681 16 дней назад +2

    Get Ukraine into NATO, even if they have to cede land. Lose some territory to get maximum benefits.

    • @patrickyk1900
      @patrickyk1900 14 дней назад

      After a peace deal can be reached

  • @Listenerandlearner870
    @Listenerandlearner870 16 дней назад +1

    President Duda of Poland met former President Trump.

  • @vortigern3910
    @vortigern3910 15 дней назад

    I think someone needs to break it to these guys the UK has been over for some time now, i do not recognize the land of my forefathers anymore it is a shame.🙃

  • @GordonJones-hm3kr
    @GordonJones-hm3kr 16 дней назад +2

    Extremely disappointing interview, Binyon seems clueless in so many areas, just regurgitating main stream press.