Prop Master and Historian Fact Check Weapons from 'Game of Thrones' to '300' | Vanity Fair
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024
- Prop Master, Larry Zanoff, and Historian, Dr. Kelly DeVries, fact check battle scenes from 'Game of Thrones,' 'Gladiator,' '300,' 'Monty Python and the Holy Grail,' 'A Knight's Tale' and 'Maximillian' and analyze their historical accuracy and use of weaponry.
Still haven’t subscribed to Vanity Fair on RUclips? ►► bit.ly/2z6Ya9M
ABOUT VANITY FAIR
Arts and entertainment, business and media, politics, and world affairs-Vanity Fair’s features and exclusive videos capture the people, places, and ideas that define modern culture.
Prop Master and Historian Fact Check Weapons from 'Game of Thrones' to '300' | Vanity Fair
The historian is having such a good time listening to how they did the shots.
@Himalayan Duck The problem is, we will never know 100% how things were, a lot of history is based on speculation and educated guesses IMO.
@@drupiROM how is this relevant?
@@Mushimiya Because they might be both wrong, the prop guy and the historian.
But not much in the mood of talking about history facts x fiction
As a historian, I was doing the exact same thing lol
"clearly we are not cutting arms and limbs off of an actor"
no dedication to the craft these days.. -.-
But if he did that he would die
Don't r/whoosh me. Is only joke
Or you know, have someone who’s already missing those limbs
LMAO at this comment.
They used to in my day
All I can think of is The Prestige
These two had a great energy between them, I'd love to see them back on the show again reviewing other movies!
Brb I'm off to write a story about two old friends, one a historian and the other a prop master, and their movie night conversations
well, you all got your wish :)
Gaaaauauyuyyyuyyyyyy
@@morley364 omg pls share
when the one guy began to explain the joke in the Monty Python bit, though... i was wondering why that got in. Either 1. he charmed everybody on set, and they wanted to put him in a bit more 2. he spoke so much, he explained every tiny thing exhaustively, so after delving for weeks in the footage, the editor snapped and made us all see the tip of the iceberg.
“If I actually stabbed you right now with a gladius...”
“Oh... please don’t” 😂
::star girl:: gladiator reboot 2021
Well, there is a gladius in the background.
Was very interesting to hear the origin of 'freelance' and 'blackmail'
Yes!
i have heard a different but similar origin for freelance.
Definitely a highlight for me.
Well either this historian or Wikipedia is wrong: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail#Etymology.
@@frankflowers The explanation on Wikipedia seems a lot more likely. The historian's etymology depends too heavily on a lot of aligning specifics, like the colour and type of the armour in question, which is typical of "reverse-engineered" etymologies. Real etymologies are typically kind of boring...
Note to self: Hydrate before battle.
Just not too much... Embarrassing if your bladder is at a breaking point in the middle of battle.
Bring a flask
@@pop5678eye Just let it go during battle lol might repulse the enemy
@@marioluisbonoan6175 There's a lot of images in the 15th century of men having water bottles and camp followers bring up water in the lulls in the fighting
Doesn't everyone bring a belt full of health potions?
Python actually used an actor with one leg for the scene when the Black Knight is jumping up and down on one leg. The rest of the time it's all John Cleese
Holy crap! All these years and I didn't know that.
They also used the one legged actor when they had to dig the hole. That way they only had to dig a hole for one leg.
The Omniscient Tomatoe got me dying over here dude. Lol
I dont believe you. Where did python get budget to pay him? They're spent on Tim's explosives!
@@masbaiy4858 watch the movie with directors commentary. Don't believe me, believe John cleese
The bow that Bolton uses in GoT is based off the double bows made by the Penobscot Native Americans. The bow had a second set of smaller limbs stacked on top of the main bow. The secondary limbs acted sort of like recurved limbs, adding power and arrow speed without having a bow with super long limbs.
Jon Reyes I came here to say this.
god i miss GOT
NEAT
When you’re native and didn’t know this...
But my people were fisherman 😂
This is cool tho
Jeorg Sprave would like a word
I object to the fact they said the Holy Grail isn't 100% historically accurate.
@bored `tis the most deadly beast of them all
And they didn't even show them the historically accurate Holy Granade of Antioch
Ni to them!
When Holy Grail doesn't accurately portray history, it's because history is wrong.
Tis not accurate?!? RUN AWAY!! RUN AWAAAY!!
He said the same thing that Cam Haynes said about Rickon Stark... He really should have zig zagged.
Serpentine! Serpentine!
ruclips.net/video/W9MU2oXzSL4/видео.html
One thing always worth remembering about Monty Python and the Holy Grail - it's initial budget was only £200,000, which wouldn't have covered catering for any of the other films.
Yeah, that's why their "chainmail" is grey dyed wool lol. It looks shockingly realistic though, considering that fact.
@@SRosenberg203 And explains the coconuts. Not an initially scripted joke, they just couldn't afford horses for the main cast.
Let's not take inflation into account in that comparison at all. The Holy Grail is 20+ years older than the others. Not to say it wasn't a small budget, but they also wouldn't be able to make it for that much today.
@@ernavill3261 Oh, of course. $200,000 in 1975 is equivalent to a little bit less than $1,000,000 in 2019. Even 'low budget' and indie films have budgets that are WAY higher than a million dollars.
@@SRosenberg203 While not at all representative of indie films, worth remembering The Room cost about $6,000,000.
I want more of these so bad. Bring them back!
I want another episode of this, but also with a linguist. Language is so often overlooked in historical movies that you have words like divorce, suicide, million, f*ck... in periods of time were they did not exist. It would be nice to watch an expert in the topic say what they think about it and what they find good, just like these two guys. Great chemistry too!
I mean language itself is so different even with most common words sounding so different that if you g back more than a couple of centuries it would be pointless to do these kinds of videos since so many words would be different.
They didn't spoke English, and not even a modern language, where words cannot neccessarily be translated 1 to 1, so this would be kind of pointless...
@@lal12 I was not asking for a linguist to evaluate language accuracy but vocabulary choice, no need to translate for that. I think it would be a fun video to watch, thanks anyway
@@eliblolo9714 yeah... I think it would be interesting to see what they could point about the language
That's something that really bugs me too, when you hear modern idioms thrown into a period piece. Like in "The King" you have Henry V telling his younger brother in 1410 "I'm not here to steal your thunder". It just stands out so jarringly.
The prop lance is all ready: Dried spaghetti
That rhymed too
buddabudda mom’s spaghetti
...theres blood on his chain mail already.
Knee's weak, armor's heavy
Palms are sweaty
I’m sure it’s kind of a “grass is greener” thing, but other professions outside of my own are so fascinating.
What's your profession? If you don't mind me asking😁
Also interested to know haha
It's also just fun to learn!
Everything in your profession was fascinating to you at one point too!
Ditto. I’m a nurse and I have zero interest in watching any of the medical expert videos on here. But videos like this one? You bet I’m watching it!
Why does every history professor look like this?
Sitting while reading, cookies & milk
I've seen him on a lot of documentaries.
This is more indicative of scientists of his age in general then just professors. A grown up hippy in business casual. My dad takes it one step further and wears jeans.
You must have a beard and a pony tail just to get a foot in the door
@@Menstral So every history professor is also secretly Santa. A shocking revelation!
The Black Knight from Monty Python is my favourite character
_"Tis but a scratch"_
"I've had worse..."
"...Come back here and take what's coming to you, I'll bite your legs off!"
@@SkorLord "What are you going to do...bleed on me?"😉
it's like 40 years old, pretty rotten meme at this point. why not find some fresh stuff?
@@andrewescocia2707 because its iconic and great things like that dont rott and its not a meme.
I think these guys forgot Monty python and the holy grail takes place in modern day..hence why they get arrested at the end by police in cars.
oh wait till the history side of youtube gets a hold of this
That one sword guy who's videos keep popping up in my recommendations (you know, that one guy with the pony tail and the goatee) is gonna have a *FIELD DAY* pretentiously breaking down every nuance of this break down.
@@del132 he's gonna unscrew his analysis and throw it vigorously at this video.
@@del132 also the long hair Italian guy and Hilbert
@@del132 i hate him.
DoctorBarbarian the Castle guy ?
Actually there are accounts of roman legionaries using their gladii for cutting, there's an account about the aftermath of a battle against Pyrrhus that describes how the greeks were horryfied by the sight of arms cut off by the roman swords. The gladius was mainly used for thrusting, tru but it was also perfectly able to cut. Moreover, some classes of gladiators didn't have scuta , but sonetimes smaller shields or even dual wielding, they used the gladius mainly for slashes, sometimes the ones they used dind't have sharp edges, to prevent killing the opponent. Gladiators weren't legionaries, they were entertainers.
Yeah, like wasn't gladiatorial combat more of a Roman WWE? I don't think they were actually trying to kill each other most of the time.
Wait I thought the Gladius was only adapted after the conquest of Iberia. So during that battle the sword they used shouldn't be the Gladius but some other sword model. I might be mistaken though.
Yeah the whole stabbing thing makes total sense in a formation sense but considering the width of the blade there is no reason why it wouldn't be a very capable machete like weapon
Yeah the remarks about the gladius were pretty rough. It had a reputation for thrusting over slashing not because it was worthless for anything else but because it was effectively a formation fighting weapon in the same vein as much later European pikes and halberds. There was enough weight in their blades combined with an edge entirely capable of slashing that you could chop and hack through a frightening quantity of things - pretending like they were blunt lumps of steel anywhere but the tip is disingenuous.
@@MisdirectedSasha no they definitely were trying to kill each other, in some years in Rome 9000 gladiators died a year
Had him as a professor. Great guy, great teacher!
I'm hoping to get him now. What class did he teach?
Carlos Balazs research methods and some stuff about the crusaders. All great
I’m with him this semester for history of the crusades and history methods. Which are both in the same classroom so I basically don’t move for 3 hours 😂
The major inaccuracies that were not mentioned about the last fight scene is the guy wasn't wearing anything under his helmet. He should have a padded cap at the least.
I was thinking that too. Like some plate chin protection (is it called a gorget?). But other than that, are there major inaccuracies?
@@Denemil The actual term is "bevor".
@Neutral Observer TV is right right.
A gorget is the thing that protects your neck and upper chest, just fyi
They didn't address really any inaccuracies. There's far greater inaccuracies or silliness in that scene than what you mentioned and you're not even correct about padded caps.
7dayspking Wrong.
The history professor neglects to mention that Maximilian should be wearing a bevor with his helmet because his chin and neck are completely exposed.
Thank you!!! I was looking for someone to mention this (well, I was looking for gorget, because I forgot that a salet helm was paired with a bevor....
Just came here to point out that they did in fact use a quadruple amputee for when the Black Knight had no limbs left. They didn't have enough money for horses, by they managed to get someone with no limbs. Go figure. XD
@Averil Mae Whoops, my mistake. I was unaware of the terminology. You really do learn something new every day.
@Averil Mae Ah, I see. Wow. I'm glad you liked learning my fact too!
No, they did not.
@@emilykolaja2816 wholesome exchange on the internet for a change hahaha. Thank you for that
It wasn’t just that they didn’t have the money for horses, they also didn’t want to have to teach all of the Pythons to ride which would have taken a bunch of time and money to do.
I’d watch a whole channel of the historian.
For real, he has a very clear and engaging way of explaining things
I wouldn't. He clearly doesn't know his stuff at all...
@@batteredwarrior well he's not a _movie_ historian
@@PACKERMAN2077 what the heck does that have to do with anything? 😂
If you just want to watch a history professor react to stuff check out *Mr. Terry History.*
The historian in this episode, may have given the air of stumbling over himself because they may have not given him much time to prepare.
9:47 how cute is he...He’s so proud of his dad-props-history joke. I couldn’t help but smile with him. I enjoy these “experts” videos. Very informative & entertaining.
I want more of this. But with historical movies and legendary battles. As well as mythology
Something on tactics could be great. Mythology too, since a lot of that in movies seem based more on pop culture than the actual myths of their age.
The gladius isnt only a stabbing weapon, the end of the blade is often wider to make it chop better, like an axe
Yep, this guy is a hack.
Well Russel Crowe wielded them like Samurai swords...
One of the things i loved about the Game of Thrones prop makers is the style they gave to each region in that world. In the south were they are richer and tourneys are held for entertainment the armor can get quite exaggerated and flamboyant. Very showy. Meanwhile in the north were resources are more scarce and fighting is done less for "fun" and more out of necessity the armor is simple, basic, and built for purpose over flair.
You can't unsee the rubber Longclaw once you see it.
Jake Cooke valerian rubber lol
I've always respected armor makers. A harness is heavy of course, but they are made in such a manner that the wearer can even do gymnastics in them because they flow so well with your body
Knights Tale was a very underrated Heath Ledger movie... R.I.P. bruh
“Later in the scene his sword stumbles”
Cuts to a clip of the horse getting shot to death like it’s the end of Old Yeller
As far as I understood. The Gladius, was a double edged weapon...so not only was it used for thrusting, but also hacking. Hacking at the limbs of your opponent...arms....legs...etc.
Also great for hacking brush and such, machete-like.
The way the black knight skip and shift around with no arms always cracks me up
Like every single second of this movie is iconic.
Holy Grail is an totally accurate film, by far the most accurate film to date.
“ARE YOU NOT INTO TRAINS???”
blech71 hahahaha
I have to admire the engine-uity of that pun.
About the jousting, I recommend people to watch : Adam Savage Tours the MET's Last Knight Exhibit
You can see how the armours evolved specifically for that, and how they even spring loaded some of the armour plates to eject after impact!
This was very entertaining to watch! I love the give and take with two points of view.
Are you saying that horses arnt just a guy banging two coconuts together .... I dont believe it.
Your skepticism does you credit. My family has been breeding the finest Arabian racing coconuts for years. Don't fall for the "horses are mammals" pseudo-scientific lies that thrive on ignorance.
This is great
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" is 100% historically accurate. They are just jealous it´s a British movie and not US made, true story.
I'm surprised they didn't talk about the preceding duel with the Green Knight in Monty Python, because that was a fairly accurate scene in itself.
Knights Tale!!!! RIP Heath
Tangent, but that tv itself is a prop, and I’m loving it. They could have easily gone with a modern flat screen tv.
Would have been interesting to hear their opinions and views on ‘The King’ on Netflix
Haha I literally thought this same thing bout half way through
Not really, given they weren't critical of anything here at all really and you obviously want to hear them talk about the King because you think it's amazingly accurate, what would be achieved by that. The king isn't that accurate and some of these films are incredibly inaccurate and not a word.
@@7dayspking and your qualifications give you a say about what's accurate how?
@@fingersau6692 He is right. Do some research and you will see. ;)
They really should try to get Dr Tobias Capwell to do one these videos. He’s an actual Arms and Armour expert. He would be amazing to have on here.
Bearded Bjorn I’m sure he’d have something to say something to say about the gladius not being able to cut and chop
Yeah! This guy is probably the janitor
@@TheMan-je5xq I did such a hard eye roll when I heard that. That's how I know this guy is a hack.
The dagger is called "misericordia".
Jigs Arquiza “the dagger of mercy” how ironic that Ramsey was carrying it
The real Spartan Shields and Spears were very different than the movie but they looked just like the graphic novel though
I know these idiots who critique the movie don't understand it's based on the novel not historical relevance
Wasting enough spaghetti to make an Italian cry
15:34 Fun Fact: While John Cleese played the Black Knight, the bit with him on his last leg was played by a man named Richard Burton, a one-legged locksmith in the town they were filming in.
I hope Shad, Metatron and Matt Easton review the review.
A Gladius can’t cut! What?! A Gladius wasn’t very sharp? WHAT?!!! Quality of steel doesn’t necessarily dictate a blades potential for sharpness. This guy doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Hand and a half swords weren’t the most common swords in medieval warfare, what we now call arming swords were, and they we’re almost exclusively used with a shield and as a secondary weapon. My goodness.
It pains me that I know more about this than a Professor of History.
And the romans were capable of producing good quality stel for their time.
@@arx3516 they absolutely were
Bearded Bjorn it may not be the ideal cutting and chopping weapon but it’s certainly very capable of it. It’s certainly capable of taking an arm off
Beat me to it!
@@TheMan-je5xq absolutely. It would cut down to the bone with no trouble what so ever.
that maximilian show is absolutely incredible
its german so theres subtitles but still amazing
A Knight’s Tale is one of my favourite films of all time
The prop guy, Larry be Zanoff has/had a great prop show, Hollywood Weapons, he was in it with Terry Schappert. Really fun to watch, he plays a good straight man to Terry's madness
The sword in Maximillian is a Zweihander. It is supposed to be long because it is meant to be use with two hands.
I caught him saying the swords were too short also. I agree with you. It looks like a zweihander or other version of a Great Sword.
It's supposed to be long because it's meant to break the hafts of pikes. It's used in conjunction with your own pikes.
That bow seems to be a take on a cross between a longbow and a penobscott double bow, something like an early compound bow that uses a second smaller opposed bow at the front to help the main bow spring back faster and increasing the force over relatively the same draw length.
"It's because there's no blade inside, mkay?"
The Met has a display of Maximilian’s armor right now.
Also, I’d love to hear their take on the man on man scene in the beginning of Netflix’s The King.
I absolutely loved that! I mean, I can't say I have ever seen a medieval sword fight degenerate into a fist fight, but at the moment of first witnessing it in that movie I was like, "Wow, now that's realistic!"
The fact that they actually included the monty python clip in this made the video so much better
I just love how they both know story details of Game of Thrones (Ramsay, Longclaw, Valyrian steel etc), clearly they're fans, and hearing their take on everything was great!
4:08 not to be “that guy” that corrects the actual historian, but some late medieval daggers were worn on the back like that particularly in Italy. However I think he is more of an expert on Northern European history so that’s probably true for that region.
There are a few odd things he says. I agree with the dagger thing, I've seen tons of effigies and there is variation in where the dagger is worn, but the left thigh seems to be the least common. Also IIRC the gladius was fine for cutting, for one thing, but the thrust was better at dealing with armoured opponents. WRT gladiators, shallow slashes were preferred because they drew blood (which made a great show) without killing the very expensive, valuable slaves who did the fighting. And I'm not sure about the Phalanx being triangular.
I think the issue is getting one guy to comment on the history of every war ever; most historians (and academics in general) are specialists.
I also wish they'd get historians like Daniel Jaquet who do the practical side of things on these.
MisdirectedSasha yeah idk where he got the triangular phalanx thing. The gladius was perfectly fine for cutting but thrusting was preferred in formation.
Interestingly enough, gladiators didn’t fight to the death very often and many weren’t slaves (although a large number definitely were). There were even “referees” of sorts seen in mosaics and other art
Dagger on the left thigh didn't make sense to me either.
You would either have to cross over to draw it or draw it with your shield hand which just seems silly.
Spatha vs. Gladius - this is a Roman General, mounted, trained in the use of the spatha in the brief window of time where Rome thought they could train elite horsemen rather than hire them. The time period the movie is set in. The fun comes in when he uses a gladius as a spatha, and since he is not fighting legionaries in the arena, the gladiators used to fighting condemned legionaries have no idea how to deal with. Back to you, VF....
Thanks for this 👌
More of these guys please. This was so interesting
I've absolutely loved reading DeVries's works so to see him here was a treat
@scholagladiatoria please review this review, some statements inflicted physical pain
Thanks mate. I am glad I am not the only one who's chewing his own forehead here.
Philipp Bob Kaufmann hahah i hear that
"it's just a flesh wound" 😂 that clip in the intro got me good.
Loved the fact that they mentioned the shield of Sparta. Each warrior decorated their own shield. One warrior painted a life size fly on his shield. The other men mocked him for it and he stated, “It will be the size of a lion on the battle field.” Might not have said lion. But meaning he’d be so close when he smashed their face with his shield, it’d look huge.
That's just an entertaining myth.
@@2bit8bytes ~ yeah, maybe. If I could remember where I heard it, I could refute it.
I know it was on a podcast with a historian but don’t remember if he was saying it was an actual myth or not
Wonderful to listen to people who are so knowledgeable and enthusiastic.
This is awesome. I feel like I'm eavesdropping haha it just feels like they're talking to each other and geeking out and we're just here listening in haha they have great chemistry
I have such a crush on Kelly DeVries! I have seen him in a few History Channel-type documentaries and he is one charming historian, you betcha! Always glad to see more of him!
"maybe that would be give him an EDGE" LMAO HAHAHAH
This is really smart. Having two overlapping but distinct perspectives and expertises is so interesting and well-rounded
What is that Maximilian film? I have never heard about that and I can't find it
Look for the actor Jannis Niewöhner. It's a Tv Show released in 2017, only one season made in Austria, Germany and Hungary.
@@ursotedio thanks, I will definitely watch it!
It's on Starz in the US.
@@TGApuleius thanks, but I don't live in the US
Yeah ive never heard of it either. It looks great. I must watch it
These guys are so awesome, I want to see more of them talking together about history and props.
So educated and smart
Not really, they get a TON of stuff wrong.
Could instantly tell that this history expert was out of his depth.
Told a couple false etymologies, and didn't comment on some basic inaccuracies going on.
Can't blame him entirely I guess, You would need a medieval expert for those scenes, ancient warfare expert for the gladiator....
More false information!
Free lances? Backmail? Cmon!
Sure, smartass.
@@stifnoxii8591 Smart answer. I really like how you argued. You should teach rhetoric in schools.
I don't know what he is a professor of, but I sure hope it isn't military history or historical arns and armour. Because his students are going to know a lot of false history.
They both got so excited and bonded over the gladius, so weirdly wholesome
And they were both wrong about it :(
The gladius had 2 sharp edges for cutting, and the Romans specifically adopted it for its dual purpose.
Could've mentioned the insane lack of helmets in GoT and the completely historically inaccurate helmets, shields and swords in 300
There's no historically accurate weapons or armour in this entire review. Silly to criticize him for missing two things when he missed every or never mentioned every blatant thing in this.
Spartans in 300 are a joke, they literally wear no armor, a giant cape and bright red panties, they went over the shields, but at this point critiquing helmets when their bare chests are shown is ridiculous)))
Netflix's the king, for all of its historical inaccuracies, actually shows the way a knight was killed on the battlefield. Knocked to the ground and swarmed by daggers stabbing into every joint of his armor.
@BrEMHel how do you know that i dont?!
Would’ve loved to see them react to the King
I've watched all of the movies/tvs in this video expect Maximilian. Never even heard of it. After this I went to watch it and it was awesome (subtitles are a little tiring tho). How come I have never heard of it before??
The prop department guy, over explained that the blade wasn’t put inside due to safety reasons instead he took 5 mins explaining it. Now I have over explained his over explanation by over explaining.
Dr. Devries was my history professor! Best semester ever. So knowledgeable and he would tell the best stories! 12/10
Vanity Fair trying to get into Shadiversity's business.
Wired has a similar series been going on for a couple years.
Ismael. Yeah, and not doing all that well...
This seems to be a growing trend on the internet recently, pros breaking down/analyzing movies and other stuff
@kshamwhizzle. Sure, if you rather prefer superficial, dodgy information that barely even touches on the historical inaccuracies...
I can't wait lol. (Is this even a real historian?)
Hand and a half sword (type of longsword) was not the most common sword in the middle ages, the single handed arming sword was always the most common
The spaghetti just spoiled the whole scene for me. 😭
who toucha my spaget
Same
In regards to Gladiators not using Gladius in that way what about Dimachaeri? A type of gladiator who fought with two Gladius or similar swords. Surely in a two weapon style their would be plenty of slashes etc rather than only thrusts.
Who ever designed their backdrop didn't tell them that there is a gladius behind them lol
was not expecting the etymological/historical origin of the term "freelancer" but that's really cool
What is Maximilian? I’m not familiar with that one. It looks pretty cool though.
it appears to be a German production ruclips.net/video/IUsPfTB0bSQ/видео.html
The whole series is on STARZ, it’s pretty good if you like historical series
Hachik00 Sweet! I’ll have to check it out.
@@0508cristina thank you! I have never heard about it, but that scene alone sold it to me
How has a historian, working for a props company, never seen a Wabanaki bow before? That bow IS weird, but also a very real historical bow, which performed remarkably well.
I never noticed the floppy sword
Neither did I, but I'll never unsee it now
Wish they talkes and explained more avbout the variety of armor and fight styles on Gladiator. There are a weird variety of weapons and ways of fighting in this movie.
They could have the same subject in Spartakus. Very very interesting seeing two persons talking about things that are so specific.
I can't listen to the prop maker without thinking i'm listing too kermit the frog
He sounds like Kermit mixed with a Pakled
the steps in the maximilian part are great for montante, wind up in front, halfstep and stab right after the swing
"of course if I stabbed you with a gladius right now..."
"oh, please don't.
*shrugs* "yeah it would probably wobble a little bit"
This episode came on auto-play. I wouldn't have clicked on it, since I don't watch those shows, but these guys are great.
dude on the right is a part of a show called Hollywood Weapons where they try to recreate action scenes in real life, slightly cheesy but entertaining, sadly only has one season so far
What network is it on?
@@Just0wnedEsport i found it on Netflix, not sure what other services have it though
I believe it's the Outdoor Channel. Good show.
i'm a history guy had no interest in props but the dynamic between those 2 is really powerful, gets you in and prop man had extremely interesting, new, and random stories for me, unlike history man who was exacly what i expeched (and wish for).
glad there's a part 2
Should have viewed The King
It was really refreshing to see that kind of "fight choreography". I thought it was really realistic. But then again, I'm no expert
@@Just0wnedEsport The opening duel is probably the most accurate scene of armored combat. It's not without flaw, but its the best we have in a major film.
What'd be the point?
I love seeing the bacl and forth between pros in different fields