Dr.MacDonald's work is awesome, as is RFW's. They differ most in how Q comes to be. Q is on the way out, but Dr. MacDonald tries makes use of his version of Q.
Is it unreasonable to consider that the bible had more teachings,and when king James wanted a bible built , that he had the best scribes, and translators, the the nicean council picked their most beloved cohesive correspondences, and voted on the bit of doctrines in the kjv. But, also king james took parts out,so he could get king james in more bodily situations, so he could seem less sinner, and more in the pervsion, of his perspective Intellectually. And, king James version, is lacking in the apocryphal text that,in my opinion give more fullness to Christ, but the scribes employed came from the same school of though?!
Excellent - a real pleasure listening to two academics having a friendly and intelligent discussion about such thought-provoking subject matter.
Dr.MacDonald's work is awesome, as is RFW's. They differ most in how Q comes to be. Q is on the way out, but Dr. MacDonald tries makes use of his version of Q.
Is it unreasonable to consider that the bible had more teachings,and when king James wanted a bible built , that he had the best scribes, and translators, the the nicean council picked their most beloved cohesive correspondences, and voted on the bit of doctrines in the kjv. But, also king james took parts out,so he could get king james in more bodily situations, so he could seem less sinner, and more in the pervsion, of his perspective Intellectually. And, king James version, is lacking in the apocryphal text that,in my opinion give more fullness to Christ, but the scribes employed came from the same school of though?!