Back in 1966, in my 8th grade music class, my teacher played some songs off of Revolver, and marveled at McCartney's range. Then, he paused, and said with great emotion, "Oh why, why does he smoke? Why would anyone diminish such a great gift from God?"
@@LolLol-xl1vt you are wrong Highest note by Paul is C6 controlled Anything after that is not considered part of his Register And Freddie is able to sing that F6 anytime you ask him while Paul had to do it til it came out(his C6) The difference is that Paul wasn't able to control his notes after that C6
Paul McCartney does have a great singing voice (or at least he used to). But please remember that in some of those Beatles' songs (e.g. When I'm 64), his voice was speeded up and therefore sounded higher.
sanguine fan hey man shut up dawg he is the greatest rock and roll singer in the world and his voice is incredible so therefore shut the fuck up please.
Paul still can hit all notes as good like when he was younger, one of the best voices ever right up there with likes of Elvis Presley and Micheal Jackson.
@@brianfosterkinsale4403 He can actually still hit most of these notes, but they certainly don't sound as clean as they did when he was at that age. The man is 80 now and you can hear that his voice sadly aged along with him
@@zolchavez4893 I'll disagree, he sounded like either a spinto or a full lyric tenor to me. There's a slight chance I could be wrong and that he was using his fake voice while recording, but he was most likely some sort of tenor.
The A1 on "The Girl Is Mine" is definitely chest voice, since there was a threshold, to volume. Strohbass is essentially a strong M0 sound, while subharmonics is M1, but technically you are still singing an octave up so you’re not really singing an E1 or so in chest.
what those e6 is not controlled its just is exclamation its far from melodic his highest controlled is bb5 other than that is just wooping headvoice and squeal which is not controlled
He’s frying the super low notes and frying everything above b4. I don’t care about technically what is the correct name for his range. It’s more impressive how he sustains pitch and doesn’t blow his voice out with the high vocal frying.
@@hectorcheivz4113 I understand his capabilities and that his range was insanely wide, but he was known for recording some tracks at slower speeds and then speeding them up to create higher pitch vocals, not that he couldn’t hit them but because he liked the effect. Examples of this include Lucy in the Sky with diamonds as well as Coming Up off of McCartney 2. I presume he has done this to create lower pitched vocals as well.
@@sobos1282 Did he recorded "Lucy in..." a bit lower? how much? I'd like to receive more information please I don't doubt it, it doesn't be strange, sometimes singers from that years recorded tracks step tone lower or even less, like David Gilmour to reack the B4s in "Welcome To The Machine", but whatever it's question about just step tone or less. But even assuming Paul was doing the same thing, it doesn't make more sense or something about Paul was changing tha key to reach lower notes, and what about low notes he sang live?? obviusly without edition. In studio you can hear it legit; the manipulation in his voice and how he goes down with his throat, using also a bit blended technique with his fry/growl register to sound more rough and solid, his A1 (his lowest note) for example cames from a blended technique like that. If you can doubt about a low harmnonie he recorded higher and after he adjust the key, they could be the lines from: "The back seat of your car" that low voices behind Paul voice sounds more shift pitched, with and rare tone and voice, more manipulated by different program editors, even in The Range Place is a questionable note.
I don't really like the song but if you're going to to put Ballroom Dancing in there, the most impressive is the high scream BALLROOM DANCING!! He's off the charts.
But I think he sing most comfortably to G#4 ish in his chest voice. And he even sounds belt on G#4, like what he sounded like in if I fell(was in vein part). He often used nasso voice to help on high notes also like what he did in yesterday live. Above A4, he pretty much used falsetto and mix voice shouting. Paul is my favorite singer all time to be honest. He is for sure gifted and through morden training, he can reach higher note for sure. But he is mostly a baritenor by most common baritone range classification.
I can reach down to D#2 and up to D6 in a controlled manner, and I'm not sure how far I can reach with random squealing, but it seems around C7. And I'm 16 with a slow puberty and no vocal coaching whatsoever so there's good hope here I think Edit 1 year later: Huh so I'm 18 now, and belting A4 is easy now. The highest I can belt has gotten up to D5 on a really good day, and down to B1 on another kind of really good day (well not belting there but chest voice). I struggle to sing over C6 in head voice now though, but ranomly squealing still works.
@@kingofthenorth1295 Nice and indeed. I do have a fairly sizeable range, but the one problem is that right now, I can only reach up to A4 with my chest voice, which is not great as I can't belt that high, and I can't even do it without distortion. Gotta do those vocal exercises and stretch my voice muscles.
Were those notes all from the same Paul Mccartney? All from the original one who could sing and play the bass without looking at the fretboard or the later Paul that had to constantly look down?
freddie has better volume output resonance and vocal quality than paul squeaky and thin voice and creaky fryish/growlish low and shouty belt go high or low however you want but it sounds nothing compare to freddie mid belt in love is a hero
Freddie has more consistency with his tone through his registers imo but there is no best singer its just what u prefer. Paul might have a bigger range but i prefer freddies voice overall personally
Dao Mund Si theyre probably the most influential but i think greatest band is subjective Edit: i actually agree the beatles are the best band to me but again it is subjectivw
Ha! At all the Freddie trolls. Man why are people so on his tit? Are these the woke people? The video is about Paul McCartney who i would never really consider a vocal ranger but a straight ahead top tenor. He made his money singing high. The stuff he's sung of late singing low is garbage imo and he should know that. He made his mark harmonizing with John. He took that high end sparkle and made quite a career out of it. There is such a thing as singing too high. Even if a male could sing higher it's not really a good thing to go there, nor is it a good idea to sound like a bass harmonica. It's mush and slush. Paul Mccartney is not some accapelist singing in front of a bunch of snobs, he's a pop singer. There's really nothing worse than hearing a glass breaker, it's like listening to a mosquito in one's earlobe. Paul was singing in the context of a pop vocal group not acting like some pseudo classical operatist. People get so impressed when someone trills, or sustains forever or whatever but what does that do for the song? Paul McCartney was dedicated to the song. He didn't have to go out of his way to be flamboyant, there were no closets to come out of. There you will find the answer. Paul McCartney is just the better singer. Only thing Freddie has on Paul is tooth length.
Nahh sounds definitely like Paul lowest notes, that kind of chest-fry mix he uses to get lower notes is very similar to the C2s, i'd definitely say is him too.
@@hectorcheivz4113 I am a low bass myself and I know the difference between the sound of a chest voice, fry and throat singing. C2 in this video is a pure chest sound, that's how the basses sing it. A high tenor like Paul physically will not be able to take these notes in this way, only using different vocal techniques: throat singing, fry, subharmonic. This is what he does with other low notes (below F2), which are demonstrated here. And C2 is definitely singing some bass from the choir.
@@RED_WIND. yes he can. Yes a tenor can do as well a C2 or even lower on chest or any other vocal register simply if he got enough vocal training and experience to reach it, that's a basic judgement you're doing but it's wrong, is silly separate voice types with the notes "they are able to do" is silly to say a tenor cannot get anything below E2, or a baritone or bass cannot goes higher than A4 on chest, it depends their developed vocal technique, not just their natural tessituras. There are Many baritones and basses can goes higher on chest than other tenors and tenors can go lower than other baritones as well, and Macca vocal capabilites are excellent on both of his vocal extremities to make comprensible reach an A1 as is showed in the video.
@@hectorcheivz4113 yeah you are right. I listened back to it and it’s kind of a mix with some head voice there. I haven’t seen many people can do pure chest above Eb5.
Man doesn't even go into an A4 without using falsetto. I don't mean to undermine his influence as an amazing songwriter and singer in his own right, but his vocal prowess is largely over inflated by people on the internet. If you want to hear a true "tenor" in popular music, go listen to the likes of Roy Orbison or Freddy Mercury. If one truly wants to get into it, look into operatic Tenors who truly define the standard abilities of a tenor (that high C beauty). Paul doesn't compare whatsoever. However, Great musician nonetheless.
@This Is Maybe to you subjectively, but in terms of technique and range he is objectively inferior to both given examples. Again, not trying to offend anyone as Paul McCartney is a successful and obviously enjoyed musician.
@This Is In regards to the upper register, Paul can't be compared to someone such as Jeff Buckley. In terms of overall technique, the superiority of both musicians voices (and many others) over Paul McCartney is blatant. Don't know what else to tell you, it's all in the vibrato. Cheers
@This Is You got no facts yourself. To claim Paul McCartney has a better upper range than Jeff Buckley is almost kind of funny, let alone not a fact lol.
For someone who didn't take a single singing lesson is v much impressive what he did. Of course you can't compare with operatic singers, he didn't have all that technique but he had a beautiful clear tone plus amazing control. Aaand sometimes singers that aren't technically perfect are able to transmit more emotionally with their voices IMO (esp if they write their songs, like Paul did)
@@hectorcheivz4113 Paul has a decent voice, but I wouldn't call those high-pitched sounds that he makes "Singing". IF you want to hear a singer with a wide vocal range, with sustained melodies and power, listen to Steve Perry, Brad Delp, or David Phelps. Those are some elite-level vocalists. Again, Paul is a decent singer and by far my favorite voice from the Beatles; however, he is not in the same league as singers that are known to have legit vocal ranges exceeding 4 octaves.
@@VoxBox2000 Why do you think he's not singing on his highest notes? Some of them actually are non melodic notes, tho that, they're inside on a musical context, altough he's not particularly singing, like his screams, for example the G5 on long tall Sally, or the Bb5 from Can't Buy Me Love. They're very good ones, with solid pitch, and wildness and ejecution for trash them out. Aside that, there are other notes are certainly 100% melodic, as his highest countable falsetto (C6) or the Bb5 on this video, other pretty indeed controlled falsetto, or the great A5 on mix voice from Twist and Shout
@@hectorcheivz4113 I am being too hard on Paul, I will admit that. I just got done listening to a few other "vocal range" videos, and Paul doesn't compare, technically speaking, to the ones I listened to. Again, Paul is a good vocalist and has a decent range; however, when I stack him against some of the other powerhouse vocalists I was listening to, it just doesn't compare. Steve Perry / Brad Delp / Geoff Tate / Tony Harnell / Michael Sweet / The list goes on...
@@Master356yt looool por eso. A ver papá, le estás contando un C2 completamente mal ejecutado, con un pitch de porquería y sobretodo, en una entrevista donde solo es el hablando y no hay el más mínimo intento musical, no hay ninguna forma en que puede ser contable. Para sus notas que le cuentas como G#6 y E7 (si es que para empezar realmente esos son los tonos, porque suena más a sexta octava ese "E7") a final de cuentas son notas suuuuuper mal dadas, no hay nada de control en esas notas, solo es una inhalación que el hace para llegar al tono sin nada de control, por eso como dije en mi primer comentario, esas notas son mierda u no tienen la calidad suficiente para entrar como parte del rango vocal de ningún cantante. Eres el tipico sujeto que le cuenta cualquier sonido de pésima calidad al cantante como parte de su rango vocal, aún cuando esté nisiquiera este cantando (como ese C2). Sorry bro, pero esa es la verdad, esas notas no cuentan para el rango de Freddie ni de ningún cantante amigo.
@@hectorcheivz4113 Fact is that most people (males) can't even get and sing an E7, even though it could've been done badly. Let's be serious, over E6 (achieved in It's Late) Freddie sings in whistle. Whistle can not sound always pleseant. I think it's quite impressive anyway, cos most people would just dream to achieve that.
Paul was a good singer, and GREAT COMPOSER, but you are obviously no vocal coach and/or know nothing of octave range. Elvis Presley, Freddie Mercury, Whitney Houston, etc. They are singer's singers and had real range
@@themriron2391 Correct. To claim he had a 5 octave range actually makes a mockery of everything and shows a total lack of knowledge as to voice and music.
Christopher Tyler I’m a little confused as to what you are taking issue with. Are you saying the notes are incorrectly identified? I don’t think the OP is claiming that all those notes are well controlled or that the ones at the extreme ends represent particularly useful parts of his range, just that his larynx actually could produce those frequencies.
Christopher Tyler Elvis was a baritone not a tenor like Paul. They both had great voices. Paul may hit the high notes but it's falsetto. When you're over 60 your voice is gone. Arnold Bourbon Amaral P.S. I'm going to go to a concert with someone that's over 60 you're paying for the legend. Take care
Christopher Tyler Also... Mercury and Houston I’ll give you, but you’re not seriously suggesting that Elvis Presley has a broader vocal range than Paul McCartney are you? Elvis is known for many things, but a remarkable vocal range is not one of them. You can prefer the timbre of his voice, but range is a simple matter of mathematics, and by any measure, McCartney’s is bigger.
prefer noto Paul actually has a legit whistle register that extends up to around C7 or higher. He uses it like 3 times in recording though. I imagine the inhaled notes are more for effect.
There is NO WAY he can sing down to an A1. Trust me, you don't know how low that note is and he cannot sing up to an E6 either. there is NO WAY he has a 4.5 octave range. You are way exaggerating & your examples are not accurate on the extreme low end or the extreme high end. LOL
@@rafaeljannotti3002 You don't know what you're talking about so shut up. Around 2:40 or so on the original record where Paul answers real low, he goes down to an E2 which is NOT anywhere near an A1. It's a PERFECT 5TH ABOVE an A1.
@@rafaeljannotti3002 NO HE DOESN'T. He goes down to an E2 which is a perfect 5th ABOVE an A1 on your little clip at .08. You don't know what you are talking about. LOL
@@yesterdayproductions1019 dude you are making a fool of yourself. When he sings at 0:08 "I guess she's *MI*ne " at Mine he hits an A1, I just checked on the piano.
Back in 1966, in my 8th grade music class, my teacher played some songs off of Revolver, and marveled at McCartney's range. Then, he paused, and said with great emotion, "Oh why, why does he smoke? Why would anyone diminish such a great gift from God?"
What's your point? Lol
I was born in 2002 🤣🤣
Rock on man!! That sounds dope!!
If you've heard his latest album, or heard anything from his concerts in the past few years, it's definitely diminishing.. Sad to hear it..
Scott Anders You can’t really expect his voice when he was in his 20s, he’s closing in on 80 now
McCartney's voice is out of this world
His voice man. Very unique.
One of the best singers ever
The A1 is unbelievable. Such a clear tone too.
His last two were whistle screams that sounded very much like Diamond David Lee Roth
Thats called whistle voice
No, DLR sounded like Paul!
how can he be a tenor and sing in such low notes?
No one knows the way people judge his vocals in Google they said he's a tenor
It's called subharmonic singing.
Azeto Z. You sure? Sounds like chest voice to me?
@@D3xTRb0y every part of the video?
John Brian CatedrillaI The A1 and C2
I saw him in Boston on June 7th during his Got Back tour and he sang the high note for Hey Jude!!! At almost 80!!! I was cheering so loud
The last minute of this video: "WOOOOOOOO"
That E5 is amazing 3:13
Paul got a cool voice.
He is THE BEST, peridod.
ahh yes, peridod
I hate when my girlfriend is on her peridod
THE BEST what? Singer? No. Best Beatle? How about best living Beatle, peridod.
His vocal range is larger than Freddie's or Dio's
It's more lower yes but not higher than Freddie's
The Sad Musician he's higher is C7 and Freddie's higher was F6
@@LolLol-xl1vt you are wrong
Highest note by Paul is
C6 controlled
Anything after that is not considered part of his Register
And Freddie is able to sing that F6 anytime you ask him while Paul had to do it til it came out(his C6)
The difference is that Paul wasn't able to control his notes after that C6
@@LolLol-xl1vt His highest countable note is an E6, not a C7
The Sad Musician his just one note below Freddie in high and in low he's 4 notes below so I'm correct his Vocal range is LARGER than Freddies
Paul can jump from bass to soprano faster than a Ferrari going 0-60 mph.
Paul McCartney does have a great singing voice (or at least he used to). But please remember that in some of those Beatles' songs (e.g. When I'm 64), his voice was speeded up and therefore sounded higher.
While you may be right, he can sing all of those songs live as well so he still has the vocal range to hit those notes.
sanguine fan hey man shut up dawg he is the greatest rock and roll singer in the world and his voice is incredible so therefore shut the fuck up please.
@@mhoule1347 grow up dude.
@@mhoule1347 That was just a fact ... He didn't undermine Paul in any way
Listen to live shows from the early 60s. He's unbelievable.
The man is a monster
En realidad lo más factible es que sean 2 o más personas
That shout out in Mull of Kyntire is one of my favorite sounds in music! and the video is truly well-done, thanks for sharing
Me: hit my toe
Also me: 4:15
Paul still can hit all notes as good like when he was younger, one of the best voices ever right up there with likes of Elvis Presley and Micheal Jackson.
Elvis Presley does not have the vocal ranges as Paul. Super overrated for tone over pitch.
I thought he hugely damaged his voice?
@@brianfosterkinsale4403 He can actually still hit most of these notes, but they certainly don't sound as clean as they did when he was at that age. The man is 80 now and you can hear that his voice sadly aged along with him
@@guilhermeirineu420 i mean what do you expect, he is still a legend
Prince was a way better singer than Michael Jackson
he’s such a gifted musician
Paul McCartney has a more extensive vocal range than Freddie Mercury
Wait why you need to compare Paul to Freddie? What's the problem?
@@shahaffiq5860 He can do more vocal ranges than Freddie, but Freddie is great too.
Freddie barítono, Paul McCartney tenor ✋✋✋
@@zolchavez4893 I'll disagree, he sounded like either a spinto or a full lyric tenor to me. There's a slight chance I could be wrong and that he was using his fake voice while recording, but he was most likely some sort of tenor.
Which Paul?
I love showing people this video
Come è possibile a un tenore come Paul arrivare a note cosi basse? Voce incredibile!
3:37 when I step on a lego.
🤣😂
“I’m looking through you” is a Bb4.
Actually B4 too! He slides off the minor third and down to the Ab4 they list in the video.
More people should see this. Nicely Done.
His subharmonic register is striking
He doesn’t use subharmonics
The bass range that he uses, isn’t that a fry mix?
@Dime Fe That’s what I mean. It’s chest voice pulsated/slowed by m0 (fry), creating a very deep tone.
The A1 on "The Girl Is Mine" is definitely chest voice, since there was a threshold, to volume. Strohbass is essentially a strong M0 sound, while subharmonics is M1, but technically you are still singing an octave up so you’re not really singing an E1 or so in chest.
Wrong, he does not use subharmonics. Just because you learned a fancy singing word doesn't mean any low singing is subharmonics.
I’m convinced there’s nothing this man can’t do
G5 scream of mix voice wow paul is a god when it comes to music world
That clip in which he does kargyra (Mongolian throat singing) is impressive.
That note in girl is mine makes me so happy whenever I hear it haha
Me too, lol
Where can I find that version of Maybe I'm Amazed?, it's amazing!
ruclips.net/video/igTJMye-1Jo/видео.html
So now i can confirme you're amazed, :D not maybe as Paul wrote (sorry for my bad joke) :(
You can find it on disc 2 of the McCartney album re released
I thought Paul had a really high vocal range, well it turns out I was wrong
The last 3 are literally just screams
yep i put in the video all his notes, altough i'd say he's highest countable note it's C6 or E6
L.O.L
Screaming is harder than you think😅
A scream also passes through your vocal cords, so it stills beaing vocal range
In perfect pitch. Find another singer who screams in perfect pitch
Was that Michael Jackson with him in the first clip? Never knew they collabed
I guess it sounds a bit like him
Not sure if it's him I'll Check
Yes it is
It's called
"She's mine"
The song is "The girl is mine" and they collabored in other songs too, like "Say say say" or "The man"
Have u been living under a rock?
Yeah say say say
Imagine trying to compare any modern day artist voice with Paul McCartneys voice
Dimash
@@shahaffiq5860 It wasn't a question you piece of shit
Best beatles voice
This is insane, he's out of this world when he at his prime
Oh mu god that voice is so high
Above C6, there was only E6 worth counting. The rest are just short screams.
yeah i agree, but that E6 sounds with good control, i think isn't wrong count until E6, after all, C6-E6 is just two tones
@@hectorcheivz4113 Yeah, I now wonder why wasn't it counted on TRP, I think it's good enough.
The last to sound very synthesized
what those e6 is not controlled its just is exclamation its far from melodic his highest controlled is bb5 other than that is just wooping headvoice and squeal which is not controlled
that one c6 is controlled i think
He’s frying the super low notes and frying everything above b4. I don’t care about technically what is the correct name for his range. It’s more impressive how he sustains pitch and doesn’t blow his voice out with the high vocal frying.
I’m sure they did some sort of tape manipulation to slow down the low ones
Nah, it's legit, there's no editions or something
If you really know Macca's voice and capabilities, you cannot have doubts about that
@@hectorcheivz4113 I understand his capabilities and that his range was insanely wide, but he was known for recording some tracks at slower speeds and then speeding them up to create higher pitch vocals, not that he couldn’t hit them but because he liked the effect. Examples of this include Lucy in the Sky with diamonds as well as Coming Up off of McCartney 2. I presume he has done this to create lower pitched vocals as well.
@@sobos1282 Did he recorded "Lucy in..." a bit lower? how much? I'd like to receive more information please
I don't doubt it, it doesn't be strange, sometimes singers from that years recorded tracks step tone lower or even less, like David Gilmour to reack the B4s in "Welcome To The Machine", but whatever it's question about just step tone or less.
But even assuming Paul was doing the same thing, it doesn't make more sense or something about Paul was changing tha key to reach lower notes, and what about low notes he sang live?? obviusly without edition.
In studio you can hear it legit; the manipulation in his voice and how he goes down with his throat, using also a bit blended technique with his fry/growl register to sound more rough and solid, his A1 (his lowest note) for example cames from a blended technique like that.
If you can doubt about a low harmnonie he recorded higher and after he adjust the key, they could be the lines from: "The back seat of your car" that low voices behind Paul voice sounds more shift pitched, with and rare tone and voice, more manipulated by different program editors, even in The Range Place is a questionable note.
@@hectorcheivz4113 I think he's dead or sum.
Some of these examples aren't even vocals
I was confused too lol, turn mono audio off.
The greatest singer of all time. No one can even come close!
THE DEEP NOTES HAH---
I don't really like the song but if you're going to to put Ballroom Dancing in there, the most impressive is the high scream BALLROOM DANCING!! He's off the charts.
I got younger listening to this
The Eb3 (Which in context would be a D#), C#4 in When I'm 64 weren't recorded as such. Paul had the song sped up to make him sound younger.
I think you got the highest chest note wrong in the title. It should say F#5.
in the title i mean the countable range A1-E6, E6 until C7 isn't countable
Hector Cheivz understood
He has a fried gritt b5 in twist and shout and she a women
I think he has higher chest notes than that. He has screams that sound full that are above F#
He was fucking amazing on Helter Skelter
At 80 yrs old...his vocal range has aged..but I still choose Macca over lip syncers like Don Henley, and others
I mean, everyone will age 😭
what is the note he hit at JET in the end ?
at 3:49 ruclips.net/video/M8V1nFCP058/видео.html&ab_channel=NiteFox11
@@geraldocamargo4773 that's a C#5
@@canaldorium thank you
@Let it be. what do you mean ?
You forgot In the Backseat of My Car
I remember the backseat of your car
An update and definitely a better, fuller and correct version of Paul's range come in (along with Lennon's one too) :)
2:45 i love that B4
4:04 you’re telling me a 70 year old man hit that note????
B1 sounded like a motorcycle vrooming by
But I think he sing most comfortably to G#4 ish in his chest voice. And he even sounds belt on G#4, like what he sounded like in if I fell(was in vein part). He often used nasso voice to help on high notes also like what he did in yesterday live. Above A4, he pretty much used falsetto and mix voice shouting.
Paul is my favorite singer all time to be honest. He is for sure gifted and through morden training, he can reach higher note for sure. But he is mostly a baritenor by most common baritone range classification.
I can reach down to D#2 and up to D6 in a controlled manner, and I'm not sure how far I can reach with random squealing, but it seems around C7. And I'm 16 with a slow puberty and no vocal coaching whatsoever so there's good hope here I think
Edit 1 year later: Huh so I'm 18 now, and belting A4 is easy now. The highest I can belt has gotten up to D5 on a really good day, and down to B1 on another kind of really good day (well not belting there but chest voice). I struggle to sing over C6 in head voice now though, but ranomly squealing still works.
@@kingofthenorth1295 Thx. I reached down to D2 yesterday
@@kingofthenorth1295 Nice and indeed. I do have a fairly sizeable range, but the one problem is that right now, I can only reach up to A4 with my chest voice, which is not great as I can't belt that high, and I can't even do it without distortion. Gotta do those vocal exercises and stretch my voice muscles.
@@kingofthenorth1295 Thank you very much
damn i wish i had a voice like you guys do.
My range rn is about D2-G4 not even 3 octaves
i've reached a C5 before in chest but currently i'm not able to hit it and my falsetto right now is gone. Hope i can regain it anytime soon.
Wow!!!
Were those notes all from the same Paul Mccartney?
All from the original one who could sing and play the bass without looking at the fretboard or the later Paul that had to constantly look down?
cut the crap
According to your idiotic conspiracy theory, the highest and lowest notes are still both by "Faul"
Are we certain none of those low notes were pitch shifted during the recording process?
Okay wait you just used When I'm 64, that is most certainly pitched shifted. Try again, dude.
dedballoons he can still sing it though you moron
Everyone credits freddy mercury for having a crazy voice. But he has nothing compared to paul
Hahahahahahahahahahahshahhahahahahaha
freddie has better volume output resonance and vocal quality than paul squeaky and thin voice and creaky fryish/growlish low and shouty belt go high or low however you want but it sounds nothing compare to freddie mid belt in love is a hero
Freddie has more consistency with his tone through his registers imo but there is no best singer its just what u prefer. Paul might have a bigger range but i prefer freddies voice overall personally
@@user-hy5jy7sf9j yeah there's no best singer
Just the best band of all the time = the beatles
Dao Mund Si theyre probably the most influential but i think greatest band is subjective
Edit: i actually agree the beatles are the best band to me but again it is subjectivw
Mccartney and jeff buckley are the ebest in my opinion
Brad Delp from Boston is right up there too, listen to More than a feeling.
Todas maravilhosas! Mas onde estão os agudos?
my range (counting falsetto) is G1 - E7, without falsetto only up to G#5
I could sing the mid range to the high notes. What does that make me
He should have joined some really good band, 'Who knows' he could have made a name for himself.
the
Paul McCartney sings death metal.
wow such a wide range. he went from sounding like a demonic monster to a screaming girl lol
Pau Is better than Lennon !
Possible baritenor.
C R A Z Y.
Better then John lennon
No doubt 🙄
Regarding pitch Yes but John Lennon had a sexy tone
Gina Henebury and George sexy voice
Two Pauls
Ha! At all the Freddie trolls. Man why are people so on his tit? Are these the woke people? The video is about Paul McCartney who i would never really consider a vocal ranger but a straight ahead top tenor. He made his money singing high. The stuff he's sung of late singing low is garbage imo and he should know that. He made his mark harmonizing with John. He took that high end sparkle and made quite a career out of it. There is such a thing as singing too high. Even if a male could sing higher it's not really a good thing to go there, nor is it a good idea to sound like a bass harmonica. It's mush and slush. Paul Mccartney is not some accapelist singing in front of a bunch of snobs, he's a pop singer. There's really nothing worse than hearing a glass breaker, it's like listening to a mosquito in one's earlobe. Paul was singing in the context of a pop vocal group not acting like some pseudo classical operatist. People get so impressed when someone trills, or sustains forever or whatever but what does that do for the song? Paul McCartney was dedicated to the song. He didn't have to go out of his way to be flamboyant, there were no closets to come out of. There you will find the answer. Paul McCartney is just the better singer. Only thing Freddie has on Paul is tooth length.
This is markipliers range
At this point, he's not a tenor anymore.
We all stand together - C2 - it's not McCartney singing. It's some kind of bass from the "Frog" choir.
Nahh sounds definitely like Paul lowest notes, that kind of chest-fry mix he uses to get lower notes is very similar to the C2s, i'd definitely say is him too.
@@hectorcheivz4113 I am a low bass myself and I know the difference between the sound of a chest voice, fry and throat singing. C2 in this video is a pure chest sound, that's how the basses sing it. A high tenor like Paul physically will not be able to take these notes in this way, only using different vocal techniques: throat singing, fry, subharmonic. This is what he does with other low notes (below F2), which are demonstrated here. And C2 is definitely singing some bass from the choir.
@@RED_WIND. yes he can. Yes a tenor can do as well a C2 or even lower on chest or any other vocal register simply if he got enough vocal training and experience to reach it, that's a basic judgement you're doing but it's wrong, is silly separate voice types with the notes "they are able to do" is silly to say a tenor cannot get anything below E2, or a baritone or bass cannot goes higher than A4 on chest, it depends their developed vocal technique, not just their natural tessituras.
There are Many baritones and basses can goes higher on chest than other tenors and tenors can go lower than other baritones as well, and Macca vocal capabilites are excellent on both of his vocal extremities to make comprensible reach an A1 as is showed in the video.
that is clearly not paul mccartney. that's a low bari or a bass singing.
@@DougerArt yeah, whatever you say
Chest voice to g5. The rest is head voice.
Well, actually Is not chest voice at all, is mixed or belt voice, his real chest voice ends very lower than G5
@@hectorcheivz4113 yeah you are right. I listened back to it and it’s kind of a mix with some head voice there. I haven’t seen many people can do pure chest above Eb5.
Impossible for a man.
I still prefer Johnny’s voice
Pusiste mayne no maybe
Paul es barítono :v
No spunto tenor
prefer noto alguien que puede manejar la 1 no puede ser tenor :v
@@eduarm0nz639tony kakko, sean peck e lou gramm soi alto tenors e podem cantar la 1st octave
Es baritono a Primer tenor
@@prefernoto4788 nosotros estamous falando Espanol
5 octaves 🤦😂
Two octaves idiot!
Man doesn't even go into an A4 without using falsetto. I don't mean to undermine his influence as an amazing songwriter and singer in his own right, but his vocal prowess is largely over inflated by people on the internet. If you want to hear a true "tenor" in popular music, go listen to the likes of Roy Orbison or Freddy Mercury. If one truly wants to get into it, look into operatic Tenors who truly define the standard abilities of a tenor (that high C beauty). Paul doesn't compare whatsoever. However, Great musician nonetheless.
@This Is Maybe to you subjectively, but in terms of technique and range he is objectively inferior to both given examples. Again, not trying to offend anyone as Paul McCartney is a successful and obviously enjoyed musician.
@This Is In regards to the upper register, Paul can't be compared to someone such as Jeff Buckley. In terms of overall technique, the superiority of both musicians voices (and many others) over Paul McCartney is blatant. Don't know what else to tell you, it's all in the vibrato. Cheers
@This Is You got no facts yourself. To claim Paul McCartney has a better upper range than Jeff Buckley is almost kind of funny, let alone not a fact lol.
For someone who didn't take a single singing lesson is v much impressive what he did. Of course you can't compare with operatic singers, he didn't have all that technique but he had a beautiful clear tone plus amazing control. Aaand sometimes singers that aren't technically perfect are able to transmit more emotionally with their voices IMO (esp if they write their songs, like Paul did)
And here is a guy who can sing better and has a larger vocal range than Michael Jackson Elvis Freddie Mercury Robert Plant and many others
Here!! 🤗🤗
@@hectorcheivz4113 no
@@theofiloshatzigiannis5308 yeah i am
@@hectorcheivz4113 no
@@theofiloshatzigiannis5308 You lost.
Loser
Half of these have no vocals
Whoever made this video… You need to learn how to make videos.
90% of these are not singing quality notes
What the hell are you talking about? 🤔🤔
@@hectorcheivz4113 Paul has a decent voice, but I wouldn't call those high-pitched sounds that he makes "Singing". IF you want to hear a singer with a wide vocal range, with sustained melodies and power, listen to Steve Perry, Brad Delp, or David Phelps. Those are some elite-level vocalists. Again, Paul is a decent singer and by far my favorite voice from the Beatles; however, he is not in the same league as singers that are known to have legit vocal ranges exceeding 4 octaves.
@@VoxBox2000 Why do you think he's not singing on his highest notes? Some of them actually are non melodic notes, tho that, they're inside on a musical context, altough he's not particularly singing, like his screams, for example the G5 on long tall Sally, or the Bb5 from Can't Buy Me Love. They're very good ones, with solid pitch, and wildness and ejecution for trash them out.
Aside that, there are other notes are certainly 100% melodic, as his highest countable falsetto (C6) or the Bb5 on this video, other pretty indeed controlled falsetto, or the great A5 on mix voice from Twist and Shout
@@hectorcheivz4113 I am being too hard on Paul, I will admit that. I just got done listening to a few other "vocal range" videos, and Paul doesn't compare, technically speaking, to the ones I listened to. Again, Paul is a good vocalist and has a decent range; however, when I stack him against some of the other powerhouse vocalists I was listening to, it just doesn't compare. Steve Perry / Brad Delp / Geoff Tate / Tony Harnell / Michael Sweet / The list goes on...
Freddie le gana C2-E7
El rango de Freddie es F2-Eb6 loool
Su C2 y su E7 apestan, no cuentan como parte de su rango vocal
@@hectorcheivz4113 en mi canal esta su rango vocal si no crees
@@Master356yt looool por eso.
A ver papá, le estás contando un C2 completamente mal ejecutado, con un pitch de porquería y sobretodo, en una entrevista donde solo es el hablando y no hay el más mínimo intento musical, no hay ninguna forma en que puede ser contable.
Para sus notas que le cuentas como G#6 y E7 (si es que para empezar realmente esos son los tonos, porque suena más a sexta octava ese "E7") a final de cuentas son notas suuuuuper mal dadas, no hay nada de control en esas notas, solo es una inhalación que el hace para llegar al tono sin nada de control, por eso como dije en mi primer comentario, esas notas son mierda u no tienen la calidad suficiente para entrar como parte del rango vocal de ningún cantante.
Eres el tipico sujeto que le cuenta cualquier sonido de pésima calidad al cantante como parte de su rango vocal, aún cuando esté nisiquiera este cantando (como ese C2).
Sorry bro, pero esa es la verdad, esas notas no cuentan para el rango de Freddie ni de ningún cantante amigo.
@@hectorcheivz4113 Fact is that most people (males) can't even get and sing an E7, even though it could've been done badly. Let's be serious, over E6 (achieved in It's Late) Freddie sings in whistle. Whistle can not sound always pleseant. I think it's quite impressive anyway, cos most people would just dream to achieve that.
Paul was a good singer, and GREAT COMPOSER, but you are obviously no vocal coach and/or know nothing of octave range. Elvis Presley, Freddie Mercury, Whitney Houston, etc. They are singer's singers and had real range
Ah so this is fake range then and his connected notes from A1-G5 are a sham
@@themriron2391 Correct. To claim he had a 5 octave range actually makes a mockery of everything and shows a total lack of knowledge as to voice and music.
Christopher Tyler I’m a little confused as to what you are taking issue with. Are you saying the notes are incorrectly identified? I don’t think the OP is claiming that all those notes are well controlled or that the ones at the extreme ends represent particularly useful parts of his range, just that his larynx actually could produce those frequencies.
Christopher Tyler Elvis was a baritone not a tenor like Paul. They both had great voices. Paul may hit the high notes but it's falsetto. When you're over 60 your voice is gone. Arnold Bourbon Amaral P.S. I'm going to go to a concert with someone that's over 60 you're paying for the legend. Take care
Christopher Tyler Also... Mercury and Houston I’ll give you, but you’re not seriously suggesting that Elvis Presley has a broader vocal range than Paul McCartney are you? Elvis is known for many things, but a remarkable vocal range is not one of them. You can prefer the timbre of his voice, but range is a simple matter of mathematics, and by any measure, McCartney’s is bigger.
Unsubscribe
Welcome
too short.
nice try, but back vocals from other ones does not count.
His contable range for me is A1-C6 Maybe to E6 sounds controlled
Why would back vocals not count? Is he or is he not singing them?
@@KrunkCobain they are inhaled which is to fo even i can inhale 7th octave but its a bad unhelthy habbit
prefer noto Paul actually has a legit whistle register that extends up to around C7 or higher. He uses it like 3 times in recording though. I imagine the inhaled notes are more for effect.
@@boundary2580 he has a yelp falsetto blended with his whistle
There is NO WAY he can sing down to an A1. Trust me, you don't know how low that note is and he cannot sing up to an E6 either. there is NO WAY he has a 4.5 octave range. You are way exaggerating & your examples are not accurate on the extreme low end or the extreme high end. LOL
There is literally a clip of him singing to A1 at the beggining...
@@rafaeljannotti3002 You don't know what you're talking about so shut up. Around 2:40 or so on the original record where Paul answers real low, he goes down to an E2 which is NOT anywhere near an A1. It's a PERFECT 5TH ABOVE an A1.
@@yesterdayproductions1019 at 0:08 of the same video we are commenting on, Paul goes down to an A1.
@@rafaeljannotti3002 NO HE DOESN'T. He goes down to an E2 which is a perfect 5th ABOVE an A1 on your little clip at .08. You don't know what you are talking about. LOL
@@yesterdayproductions1019 dude you are making a fool of yourself. When he sings at 0:08 "I guess she's *MI*ne " at Mine he hits an A1, I just checked on the piano.