For people with the metric system, Bismark had 8x38cm guns Yamato had 9x46cm guns, that’s just the main armament,a lot of small guns were also on the ships.
a few inaccuracies.. or however its spelt. 1. Bismarck only had double, not triple barrels. 2. Bismarck's cannons couldnt possibly do that much damage to Yamato's turret.. 3. yamato couldve used her 155mm cannon on the bow, or turn 90 degrees facing Bismarck and fire all her cannons. 4. Yamato didnt have carrier-based planes, it only had seaplanes. 5. ..thats a P-51 or P-40, not a japanese plane. 6. Bismarck couldnt use her cannons to shoot down aircraft, only Yamato could. 7. Bismarck couldnt split there unless it was where the magazine was. 8. Yamato or Bismarck wouldnt list based on damage, that only happens in war thunder, plus they would most likely just scuttle due to heavy damage.
The Bismarck had two-gun turrets but each pair fired three quick shots. Very poor portrayal of Bismarck's firepower. Also I don't think Yamamoto would send a seaplane to drop aerial bombs on the German warship. Interesting video, but wildly inaccurate portrayal.
That not Yak 3 and P-40, This is M6A Seiran special tactical bomber sea-plane, M6A can carry 800KG bomb or torpedo to attack battleship and aircraft carrier and cruiser and destroyer, The M6A carry in to I-400 submarine, But M6A can carry in Yamato Battleship is more hidden killer aircraft weapon machine.
@@robgibbons4650 Some M6A Seiran had no floats change to land gear, It called M6A-K Naizan training bomber aircraft, But IJN planning M6A-K Naizan training bomber change to suicide bomber aircraft to give Kamikaze pilots going suicide attack Battleship and Aircraft carrier, But this only project and cancelled.
This is the same guy who had the USS Constitution (1897) vs the Yamato for 'realism'..... Because we all know a wooden sailing ship is a real threat to a modern warship any day.....
Bismarck had only 2 salvos per gun, and the Yamatos turret armor was wayy to thick for it to be penetrated, also both ships are facing themselves twoards the front so the Bismarck would likely do minimal damage to the Yamatos Hull, while the Yamato could possibly penetrate although it wouldn't be as extreme.
@@Packless1 with a new AP shell designed after the war, at point blank range at the perfect angle. In a WW2 battle, Iowa would have difficulty penetrating Yamato. Yamato on the other hand would have less difficulty penetrating Iowa.
Bruh, Bismarck is armed with 4 twin 380mm gun batteries And I'm sure that 380mm shells cannot destroy Yamato's gun battery that easily, since Yamato's one of the thickest armor part is at her gun batteries
Yamato isn't that weak. In a 1v1 battle, Yamato would easily win because it has far superior armor. Yamato's 18.1-inch guns can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor, whereas Bismarck’s 15-inch main batteries can't penetrate Yamato's armor unless it's from a range of at least 18 km for Bismarck's shells to be effective. Meanwhile, Yamato’s range is at least 42 km. Just 2-4 shells hitting Bismarck would be enough to sink it. I'm puzzled as to why Bismarck is so highly praised when the only ship it sank was an old British one. Even the Iowa-class ships would likely struggle against Yamato, and yet they’re comparing Bismarck to Yamato.
2-4 shells? You must be American to think that lol. How many 16 inch shells do think the British fired into Bismarck from point blank range? The crew were forced to blow the bottom out off him to actually sink him and stop the crew from being all killed.
@@no1dea261 If you want to believe that 2 shells could do more to Bismarck than 2 Battleships armed with 16 inch guns could do in a 100 minutes that’s your choice. Me I prefer not to live in dream world
Ideal: Bismarck and Yamato are evenly matched! Reality: Bismarck's guns could barely penetrate Yamato's armor. Yamato's one-sided massacre would result.
Yeah this is a mismatch. Bismarck is easily the worst of the WWII-Gen battleships in design. The only real advantage she has here is being 2-3 knots faster.
why? it was an idiotic matchup and for a ton of reasons and barely better than the LAST one this guy had with the (1897) USS Constitution vs the Yamato, which was pure stupidity for a 'what if'.
wait hold on, bismarck didnt have 3 barrels, plus yamato would have used the secondary gun ontop of the gun thats on the barbette, and yamato would have just fired from broadsides so she could fire all her weapons
Dam son, Funniest Meme I've seen all day. but Reality is this , the Bismarck's Fire control was LEAP years ahead of where the Yamato's was in 1940 ,the 1st salvo Bismarck fried at HMS Hood all 8 of the 15in guns, all 8 landed with in 100ft of HMS Hood , this was at a range of 22k yards(11 Miles) in contrast , Yamato in 1944(after it's 4th Fire control Upgrade) was 10miles out from Taffy 3 and was dropping shells around 1000yds off Target......Would Bismarck's 15in(1800lbs shells) sink Yamato...Yes they would , Bismarck muzzle velocity was roughly 2700ft/s , while those MASSIVE and I MEAN massive 18in 3200lbs Yamato shells had a muzzle velocity of 1600ft/s , Not saying Yamato wouldn't put a hurt on the Bismarck , but keep in mind that Bismarck was hit 105 times by HMS Rodney's 16in guns and 98 times by King George V's 14in guns, all in all 480 of the over 2700 shells fired at Bismarck landed, 720klbs of fire power to sink Bismarck. Meanwhile Yamato was sunk by 12 bombs and 7(some sources say as many as 12) torpedoes' for total of 40klbs of Fire power, granted piercing a deck with a 1000lbs bomb verses a 2000lbs shell , the Bomb has more of a devastating impact. But REALITY is it took 100X the explosive force to sink Bismarck then Yamato.
Yamato has more armor and bigger guns but, bismarck is muvh faster, much more manuverable, pretty sure has better rangefinders and aiming systems and has higher fire rate. In reality it would probably come down to who scores first hits on the ramgefinders or aiming systems. But i doubt either ship could fully sink the other. Both had monsterous hulls. They can put each other out of combat but full sinking is unlikely.
absolute nonsense. Bismark would be much more accurate because of much more experienced crew that was in real battles compare to Yamato, the real problem would be to penetrate Yamato's armor which is about 650mm
So many errors in this Yamato is far superior than bismarck Bismarck doesn't have 3 barrel gun turrets The planes on the Yamato are probably for rescue not bombers They are zeroes not p40s
Yamato was bigger and had bigger calibre of the guns but Bismarck was mich more modern with much much better fire Control System and wotan Steel Armor. I think in a 1 vs. 1 Yamato only can win against Bismarck with much luck.
Bismarck was commissioned in 1940 and Yamato in 1941. Yamato beats Bismarck in metric metric accept speed. Japan has very good optics and Yamato had thicker armor and bigger guns.
Non lo sapremo mai e comunqie non bastano i cannoni piu' grossi dovrebbero anche riuscire a colpire il bersaglio. I telemetri giapponeso dell' epoca non erano certo eccezionali
Ach immer diese computer Spiel Admirale sie würden besser mal ein paar Seekriegs relevante Werke studieren bevor sie sich mit solchen Firlefanz (Unsinn) lächerlich machen
In addition, the ship with a large amount of gunpowder received in the attack registered in Guinness is Musashi, the second ship of the Yamato-class battleship. It is not Bismarck.
Yeah pretty sure Bismarck only had double barrel turrets
It did
Bismark's 8 14" guns vs. Yamato's 9 18" guns.
Bismark - 15"
Correct, Bismarck did have twin turrets, but the person who made this video was probably thinking of the H class battleships.
For people with the metric system, Bismark had 8x38cm guns Yamato had 9x46cm guns, that’s just the main armament,a lot of small guns were also on the ships.
Since when did bismarck have 3 barrels
Yamato’s thickest armour even doesn’t allow its own guns to penetrate
a few inaccuracies.. or however its spelt.
1. Bismarck only had double, not triple barrels.
2. Bismarck's cannons couldnt possibly do that much damage to Yamato's turret..
3. yamato couldve used her 155mm cannon on the bow, or turn 90 degrees facing Bismarck and fire all her cannons.
4. Yamato didnt have carrier-based planes, it only had seaplanes.
5. ..thats a P-51 or P-40, not a japanese plane.
6. Bismarck couldnt use her cannons to shoot down aircraft, only Yamato could.
7. Bismarck couldnt split there unless it was where the magazine was.
8. Yamato or Bismarck wouldnt list based on damage, that only happens in war thunder, plus they would most likely just scuttle due to heavy damage.
その通り😊
ビスマルクの主砲で大和の砲塔を破壊するのはマジで不可能だ、その通りすぎる。
ビスマルクはあんな大損害はでないはずたとえ46センチ砲でも一発であの威力は出ない。さらに、爆弾だけであんな大穴を開けることはできない。全くもう。なんだこれ。@@YujE-c8x
It packed everything I wanted to say as a Japanese person.
@@YujE-c8xゼロ距離でも無理
The Bismarck had two-gun turrets but each pair fired three quick shots. Very poor portrayal of Bismarck's firepower. Also I don't think Yamamoto would send a seaplane to drop aerial bombs on the German warship. Interesting video, but wildly inaccurate portrayal.
ビスマルクが３連装砲になってて草
マジレスすると大和の主砲も壊せないからねw
連装砲だった気が、、、
アニメーションとしては好き
けどなんか違和感ありすぎる
わかる。ビスマルクが大和の砲塔を打ち破れるわけがないと思う、アニメーションは良いけどね
@@K9798sabakann
ビスマルクでは大和に不利だ
Why is there a Japanese p40?
Thought it was a yak 3 ❤
That not Yak 3 and P-40, This is M6A Seiran special tactical bomber sea-plane, M6A can carry 800KG bomb or torpedo to attack battleship and aircraft carrier and cruiser and destroyer, The M6A carry in to I-400 submarine, But M6A can carry in Yamato Battleship is more hidden killer aircraft weapon machine.
So how does it land, no floats,😂❤
@@robgibbons4650 Some M6A Seiran had no floats change to land gear, It called M6A-K Naizan training bomber aircraft, But IJN planning M6A-K Naizan training bomber change to suicide bomber aircraft to give Kamikaze pilots going suicide attack Battleship and Aircraft carrier, But this only project and cancelled.
@Bloodpixels but the airoplane droped bombs not a kamakasi, so again, how does he land, 🤣👍💖💖
大和はこんなに弱くないと思うな
Yes Yamato is much stronger
アウトレンジできますよね
Stimmt sie ist nicht annähernd so treffsicher wie im Video gezeigt die Bismarck war um Welten treffsicherer aufgrund ihrer überlegenden Waffentechnik
Yamato is a beast at ship to ship battles but it is F***ing SHIT against aircraft its aa defenses are absoulute shit ahh
@Kasernenbrot Yamatos Hauptgeschütz hat eine große Reichweite. Bismarcks Granaten erreichen uns nicht. Bismarck würde einseitig angegriffen werden.
WW1の設計を引き継いだ最も新しい旧式戦艦ビスマルクと最新鋭の大和が同レベルなはずがない
This is the same guy who had the USS Constitution (1897) vs the Yamato for 'realism'..... Because we all know a wooden sailing ship is a real threat to a modern warship any day.....
@@Slayer398Constitution already can’t handle Victory. It was funny to see
やっぱり飛行機のほうが有利🎉
Bismarck had only 2 salvos per gun, and the Yamatos turret armor was wayy to thick for it to be penetrated, also both ships are facing themselves twoards the front so the Bismarck would likely do minimal damage to the Yamatos Hull, while the Yamato could possibly penetrate although it wouldn't be as extreme.
How could bismarck damage the yamato's turret when its armor was 650mm thick?
...after the war Iowa fired on a turret of Shinano...and it went straight through...!
@@Packless1 with a new AP shell designed after the war, at point blank range at the perfect angle. In a WW2 battle, Iowa would have difficulty penetrating Yamato. Yamato on the other hand would have less difficulty penetrating Iowa.
@@dryalga4000just another iowa fan talking about how great the ship was when it was basically a show off?
Bruh, Bismarck is armed with 4 twin 380mm gun batteries
And I'm sure that 380mm shells cannot destroy Yamato's gun battery that easily, since Yamato's one of the thickest armor part is at her gun batteries
Didn’t America test a 16” shell against a 20” plate from Musashi or something and it penetrated?
@Aelvir114 the armors on Yamato's gun battery is probably the thickest on her, 650mm, how can Bismarck's 381mm guns penetrate that?
そもそもの話、大和は自分の46センチメートル砲を耐えれるように設計されていたし、ビスマルクは38センチメートル砲で歯が立たないはず。しかもよりによって主砲を破壊している。大和の主砲の装甲は正面650ミリ、上部が270ミリだ。さらに傾斜もついているため、ゼロ距離から打ったとしても効果があるのか分からない。そして大和に搭載されている航空機は零式観測機で、着弾予測機として使われたり、対潜哨戒機として使われたりした。つまりあのような爆弾は搭載できないはず。しかも、大和の船主にある旗がアイオワ級に見られる、長距離通信アンテナのようなものがあるのもかなり謎。アニメーション自体は好きだが、リアリティに欠けているような気がする。
零式水偵爆弾載せてますよ
Japanese P-40 launched from the float plane catapult. Seriously
大和に搭載している飛行機は、偵察用又は砲弾の着弾観測用です。
しかも米軍のP‐40みたいでしたね
ビスマルク進化してて草w
水上偵察機なのに爆弾ついとる笑笑
零式水偵載せてるけどね
水上偵察機や水上観測機は普通に爆装出来ますし
実際爆撃機としても結構使われていますよ。
突っ込む所は飛んできた機体が米軍のP40な部分でしょ。
Yamato isn't that weak. In a 1v1 battle, Yamato would easily win because it has far superior armor. Yamato's 18.1-inch guns can easily penetrate Bismarck's armor, whereas Bismarck’s 15-inch main batteries can't penetrate Yamato's armor unless it's from a range of at least 18 km for Bismarck's shells to be effective. Meanwhile, Yamato’s range is at least 42 km. Just 2-4 shells hitting Bismarck would be enough to sink it. I'm puzzled as to why Bismarck is so highly praised when the only ship it sank was an old British one. Even the Iowa-class ships would likely struggle against Yamato, and yet they’re comparing Bismarck to Yamato.
we don’t give a fu$$ 🖕🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪
2-4 shells? You must be American to think that lol. How many 16 inch shells do think the British fired into Bismarck from point blank range? The crew were forced to blow the bottom out off him to actually sink him and stop the crew from being all killed.
@@Marc-McloudYour talking about the highest calibre shell a Ship has ever had in history, the shell could have easily penetrated the Bismarck.
@@no1dea261 If you want to believe that 2 shells could do more to Bismarck than 2 Battleships armed with 16 inch guns could do in a 100 minutes that’s your choice. Me I prefer not to live in dream world
@@Marc-Mcloud bro what are you even saying, and on top of that your making random stuff up.
Bismarck would not win.jf.
Pls i want iowa world strongest ship vs yamato
Yamato (world's strongest) vs Iowa (world's best)
Ideal: Bismarck and Yamato are evenly matched!
Reality: Bismarck's guns could barely penetrate Yamato's armor. Yamato's one-sided massacre would result.
Why is the Yamato launching an American P-40 fighter plane that sounds like a Stuka dive bomber?
Wow, so many inaccuracies.
大和が一方的にロングレンジから撃てば勝てる
と言ってる人は多いですが実際にはそんな遠距離戦では命中弾なんかまず出ません。
むしろ火器管制の優れたドイツ艦の方が命中弾多く出せる可能性すらある。
結局一定距離まで近寄ってからの撃ち合いになる。
だからと言って38㎝砲のビスマルクが46㎝砲の大和に勝てるとは思いません。
というか「日の丸の付いたP40」はどこから来たんだ？
アメリカからのレンドリースで受け取ったんでしょ(適当)
Yeah this is a mismatch. Bismarck is easily the worst of the WWII-Gen battleships in design. The only real advantage she has here is being 2-3 knots faster.
🤣🤣🤣🤣YEP! Bismarck forgot about the aircraft. I actually thought it was going to be a Kamikaze😂😂😂NIcely done.
なぜアメリカの戦闘機が出てくるのか？あれは日本製の水上機ではない。
I thought they still fire under the water.💀
Since when did Yamato have a North American p51 mustang on its catapult 🤣
Inaccurate, there was no kamikaze action by the bomber plane.
Did- the Bismarck fire its main gun at a plane instead of the AA
The Yamato-class main gun mantlet was 650mm and could not be penetrated by Bismarck's 15-inch shells.
Please Lorotanic vs Bismark!
ty reminded me of that bowman game from addictinggames
ビスマルクじゃ大和の装甲ははがせない
Did anyone else made the Bismarck and yamato by stopping the video or is it just skill
Yamato: yes i am the winner!!
Planes: are you sure about that >:3
Literally nearly 400 planes 😂
where's kamikaze attack?
やはりビスマルクでは大和に勝てないよな
I don’t know this fight seemed a little unfair
А ничего, что 2х орудийные башни Бисмарка стреляют 3х орудийным залпом😂😂😂
Well, that was 2 minutes of my life I won’t get back
can yall shut up abt the inaccuracies
why? it was an idiotic matchup and for a ton of reasons and barely better than the LAST one this guy had with the (1897) USS Constitution vs the Yamato, which was pure stupidity for a 'what if'.
fake
Die Bismarck war treffsicherer als die Yamato und hatte auch nur Zwillingstürme
2000m〜−30000m以内ならビスマルクの主砲は大和の装甲版を貫けないよ。
Do a video of USS Zumwalt Level UP
Why is a american p40 on a japanise ship?
wait hold on, bismarck didnt have 3 barrels, plus yamato would have used the secondary gun ontop of the gun thats on the barbette, and yamato would have just fired from broadsides so she could fire all her weapons
Hydrogen bomb vs Coughing baby
Imagine trying to shoot a plane with your main cannons. This is Stupid and unrealistic
Bismark:*takes two hits*
Also bismark:*starts to tilt*
Broskie bring some realism to your videos
If japan and nazi germany was not alliys then this would've happen and the bismarck wreck would not look like that btw nice video
Dam son, Funniest Meme I've seen all day.
but Reality is this , the Bismarck's Fire control was LEAP years ahead of where the Yamato's was in 1940 ,the 1st salvo Bismarck fried at HMS Hood all 8 of the 15in guns, all 8 landed with in 100ft of HMS Hood , this was at a range of 22k yards(11 Miles) in contrast , Yamato in 1944(after it's 4th Fire control Upgrade) was 10miles out from Taffy 3 and was dropping shells around 1000yds off Target......Would Bismarck's 15in(1800lbs shells) sink Yamato...Yes they would , Bismarck muzzle velocity was roughly 2700ft/s , while those MASSIVE and I MEAN massive 18in 3200lbs Yamato shells had a muzzle velocity of 1600ft/s , Not saying Yamato wouldn't put a hurt on the Bismarck , but keep in mind that Bismarck was hit 105 times by HMS Rodney's 16in guns and 98 times by King George V's 14in guns, all in all 480 of the over 2700 shells fired at Bismarck landed, 720klbs of fire power to sink Bismarck. Meanwhile Yamato was sunk by 12 bombs and 7(some sources say as many as 12) torpedoes' for total of 40klbs of Fire power, granted piercing a deck with a 1000lbs bomb verses a 2000lbs shell , the Bomb has more of a devastating impact. But REALITY is it took 100X the explosive force to sink Bismarck then Yamato.
pretty sure bismarck's 38cm TWIN main gun can not knock out the main turrets of Yamato which face is 650mm thick
Редкостный отстой.... из двух орудий в башне стреляет три раза. Хоть бы описание посмотрели
Wrong , our Bismarck is more accurate
It is childish not to accept the strengths and weaknesses of your own ships.
なぁ―んで艦橋が殺られてるのにビスマルクは射撃出来るんですかねぇー？
On battleships, every turret had its own range finder to keep shooting individually even if the main one was destroyed
Instead of yamato its meme version is hotel class super battleship and bismarck is the cruiser a transport ship whahahaha😂😂😂😂
Yamato has more armor and bigger guns but, bismarck is muvh faster, much more manuverable, pretty sure has better rangefinders and aiming systems and has higher fire rate. In reality it would probably come down to who scores first hits on the ramgefinders or aiming systems. But i doubt either ship could fully sink the other. Both had monsterous hulls. They can put each other out of combat but full sinking is unlikely.
absolute nonsense. Bismark would be much more accurate because of much more experienced crew that was in real battles compare to Yamato, the real problem would be to penetrate Yamato's armor which is about 650mm
Wrong video
Bismarck also has 4 Arabo Ar 196 seaplanes
日本機(P40)
日本機(エンジン音JU87)
日本機？
So many errors in this
Yamato is far superior than bismarck
Bismarck doesn't have 3 barrel gun turrets
The planes on the Yamato are probably for rescue not bombers
They are zeroes not p40s
As cool and legendary as Bismarck was, Yamato would most likely smoke it.
Yamato was bigger and had bigger calibre of the guns but Bismarck was mich more modern with much much better fire Control System and wotan Steel Armor. I think in a 1 vs. 1 Yamato only can win against Bismarck with much luck.
Bismarck was commissioned in 1940 and Yamato in 1941.
Yamato beats Bismarck in metric metric accept speed. Japan has very good optics and Yamato had thicker armor and bigger guns.
なぜ大和からカーチスP40が発艦したのでしょう？
I wish this was SFM.
Hey why yamato has an Tower of Missouri and has Antenna💀
知らん
1.28 This is not a real Japanese machi
There is no mast like Iowa behind Yamato Bridge
Yamato turret front 26ins thick so Bismarck gun not build to piece anything that thick
0:43
Yamato doesnt have radar and range finder
No, there is No, there is. Please don't lie
What kind of defective battleship is it without radar and rangefinder?
British got the Bismark and usa got the yamato
Bismarck und Yamato waren Verbündete,also was soll dieser Vergleich....
Bismarck had scouts as well. But scout planes didn't really go in for bombing runs on battleships
Non lo sapremo mai e comunqie non bastano i cannoni piu' grossi dovrebbero anche riuscire a colpire il bersaglio. I telemetri giapponeso dell' epoca non erano certo eccezionali
Battleships games
大和こそ最強
Japanese bias:
but sadly, Yamato getting under rate
@ literally a bunch of planes:
Ach immer diese computer Spiel Admirale sie würden besser mal ein paar Seekriegs relevante Werke studieren bevor sie sich mit solchen Firlefanz (Unsinn) lächerlich machen
bad ending
大日本帝國海軍最強だわ！
ビスマルクの38cm砲は連装砲なのになんか三発打っているのは気のせいかな？
Bismarck took 300 direct hits and was sunk by her own crew
How many hits did yamato take before she sank
Musashi
20 torpedoes
17 bombs
Yamato was sunk by 386 aircraft with 11 torpedoes and 7 bombs
So about 9000 to 11000lbs of tnt to sink Yamato and about 225,000 to 300,000lbs of tnt for the Bismarck and then she was sunk by her own crew
It is recommended to study the difference between torpedoes and shells.
In addition, the ship with a large amount of gunpowder received in the attack registered in Guinness is Musashi, the second ship of the Yamato-class battleship. It is not Bismarck.
@@ShayneStylesEven though you are an amateur, please don't say bullshit without studying carefully.
Bismark all day long, better trained crew
Que huea.
Wtf is this garbage?
Pathetic
Ests mal hecha porque el bismarck hace 3 tiros por torreta si solo te tenía 2 cañones por torreta 🤔 no saben de barcor ofenden a estos veterenos
Nahhh Yamato >>>