The 35 Red / RF-94159 (22 Jan 2019; 1340 LT) There were 4 crews, and only 1 survived the crash. 2 passed away in the crash, and another 2 crews (Commander and Navigator) were survived in the crash then taken to the hospital, but one of them was passed away in the hospital. So sorry for the 3 crews, Blue Skies
Poor visibility, lands too hard and too fast. The cockpit section breaks off and the rear (wings) of the plane get airborne briefly before crashing. 3 of 4 people on board were killed in the crash. The survivor ejected.
@@flyboieblair6636, yeah, it looks like he did. Of course where he was rolling toward there's a gigantic Russian "JP5" inferno now burning. I'm sure that was quite a sight to as you're sliding right at it.
@@Riley77777, minimum weather. These are strategic bombers, not Piper Cubs. They have literally no forward visibility when they're landing because the nose is so long. The nose wheel lights may have made visibility worse, too, reflecting off the falling snow.
Poor visibility due to heavy snow..... Fast and Hard landing breaks the cockpit part and engines are still working 😭 Condolences to all the family's who lost their love ones
Wonder if a more modern construction would have survived the landing. I know the video can't really give a realistic picture of the extreme forces a bomber jet must endure during touching the ground with higher than expected vertical speed, but still - the nose and cockpit broke off like it was tin-soldered in it's place.
As far as I can understand construction, the bomber is not purposed to survive heavy G-forces. It should be able to carry tons of bombs and fuel, but under gentle handling. Notice that landing gears survived the initial touch, but because the whole construction allowed G is only 2.5G, the center section broken.
The initial report of this mishap indicated that the ILS (Instrument Landing System) at the airfield was inoperative and as such, it is very likely that the pilots were being guided by what is known as a GCA (Ground Controlled Approach) which is a precision radar type approach assisted by the air traffic controllers on the ground. In this case it appears the pilot may have misjudged his glideslope (angle to the runway) and reduced power too much. This is indicated by the abnormally high sink rate (descent rate) which led to the high vertical impact which broke apart the aircraft (which no aircraft could have survived a landing with such a high descent rate). If this ends up being the case, it's likely the cause will be attributed to Pilot Error with contributing factors being the near zero visibility instrument meteorological conditions and lack of an operable ILS. Despite good training and experience of aircrews (regardless of their nation of origin), sadly such mishaps still happen from time to time.
No enlighted pistes there? No braking parachuttes at all? Overloaded bomber fly machins landings under this wind conditions should have been more carfully planned! RIP for the families!
Thanks for the video, can I politely say that if you edit out the first minute where nothing's happening it would get to the point of the video please, thanks a million😊
Обыкновенное "распиздяйство". Видно же что идут много выше глиссады! И очень высокая вертикальная скорость снижения. Дослужиться до майора и не знать "золотого летного правила": все полетные правила написаны кровью??? Тем более, посадка в сложных метеоусловиях требует особенной собранности и четкости действия всего экипажа...
..looks like die hard 2 from 1990 movie. ..they make a wrong altitude measurements for ILS landing system on LaGuardia Airport. ..but this Tupolev came in incredible vertical speed. These things don't get vertical altitude radar for landing ???
@@tatemwander1874 if the approach speed was high, the airplane would have been hard to put down. In this case, the approach speed was too low and the vertical sink rate was too much, which did not give the airplane enough time or lift to pull out. Source: pilot
He is naming plane number and pilot name at the start of the video. So he is one of servicemen of that bomber squadron I assume. And he is filming landing in the heaviest weather condition just for his own purpose, why not?
I feel soooo sorry for people who become bombers, nationality does not matter, while their country is in peace... I mean not attacked. Being ripped apart by an explosion or burning while still alive is not funny either inside or outside a bomber.
right, and when their country is not in peace, they can just bomb the shit out of other people so that they are ripped apart by an explosion or burning while still alive. Would you feel less sorry, then? RIP to the crew member though, and condolences to the family, but I just don't get your narrative.
@@lxathu While there is conscription in some countries, I doubt anyone has been forced into a bomber's seat. It's a personal choice to stay in the military after a year, and get into this prestigious position.
@@akvyr In a country at war one has a great chance to get enlisted sooner or later. "I volunteered to get a proper and a slightly bigger chance to survive rather than be made a member of the mass to the meat grinder" is an ever appearing thought in memoirs. It's not a pretty ideal, just an acceptable excuse of someone who has but one life. (Catch 22 describes this pretty well.) In peace, being a mercenary and dropping anything loaded in onto people, that's what I take a quite different situation. That's when the respectful and mournful unknown soldier becomes a disgraceful assassin.
@@akvyr What?! Most pilots try out to be jet fighter pilots; however, many do not make it because of various requirements & health needed to become fighter pilot. The men who do not make fighter pilot cut are then given choice to fly cargo, bomber, ISR, tanker jets, etc...
At the start: Plane number 35, major Gur'yev, landing. Around 1:20: blyat'... Then: Should I continue filming? Next: Yes, it crashed. Last one: Welp, should we go there?
You're thinking of the older Tu-22 AKA "Flying Liquor Truck" AKA "Supersonic Booze Carrier". This is a Tu-22M. It's a different plane, about... 15 Years younger?? RUclips channel 'Paper Skies' has a hilarious & very interesting video about the old Tu-22. Check it out, it'll be worth your time!
I believe there's an ejection at 1:26, rocket-propelled object leaves the cockpit as it tumbles in flames - going off the left of the view curving slightly upwards - accompanied by rocket whoosh and doppler-shift sound that is the opposite of the rest of the sounds. edit: this may not have been surviveable or even commanded by the aircrew - could have just been the seat ejecting due to being triggered.
Even the Russians wouldn't land a civilian airliner in those conditions. Also, people say that the ILS assistance on this jet was down due to a ground control problem? so what we may have watched is a Russian bomber commander saying "let's wing it". The official Russian crash investigation claims it was pilot error but this is Russia sooooo... ... probably a combo of half ground control problems, half airframe metal fatigue, & half pilots.
@@E266PD Заслуженный ты наш пенсионер, свисти девочкам на лавочке, а не тем, кто действительно был в авиации. И выбирай слэнг, если общаешься с незнакомыми людьми.
@@user-pb6qm1lp2v если бы ты был в авиации, то знал бы что вдоль полосы дохрена огней, которые видно в любом тумане и знал бы, что автоматика (РСБН-ПКВ и система посадки Ось-1) ведет именно этот самолет почти до полосы, до 40м. Полностью ручного управления на этом самолете нет. Так что при такой автоматике грохнуть самолет, имея второго пилота и штурмана, который обязан контролировать все параметры посадки это талант. Ты или сопливый двоечник, или водило таскал на аэродроме.
They couldn't, they could have killed themselves anyway by ejecting into the ground, and their instruments weren't giving accurate readings, so they thought that they still had time
Ejection speed is about 120 km/h minimum. Cockpit detaches with pyrobolts, but should be blown away with an airflow. And mind the delay for crew for making decision for ejection.
If ejecting below 200 feet, a minimum speed of 80 mph must be maintained. Otherwise, the parachutes may not have enough time to open before hitting the ground. Plus, this happened so quickly; I doubt they had any time.
Если бы обмерз, то это проявилось бы раньше. В таких случаях сажают с помощью лидера. Был у нас похожий случай в 80-е. Зам комполка вылетел и вел за собой самолет по глиссаде, вернее даже раньше, где то с высоты 2 км. Там вообще все барометрические приборы отказали. Но всё закончилось благополучно. Правда самолет был другой МиГ-23М @@cosmopolit-ne-evreiy
![Штурм села тремя Т-90М "Прорыв" 2-серия [Полная версия]](/img/1.gif)
Pilots couldn't see anything in this weather. Crazy sink rate too.
The 35 Red / RF-94159 (22 Jan 2019; 1340 LT)
There were 4 crews, and only 1 survived the crash.
2 passed away in the crash, and another 2 crews (Commander and Navigator) were survived in the crash then taken to the hospital, but one of them was passed away in the hospital.
So sorry for the 3 crews, Blue Skies
Deepest condolences!
Great stuff! Please let us know about other successful counter-terrorist operations and their results as well.
@@spxram4793 Cool
Whoopsie.
That's terrible, condolences to the families of the air crew who died.
Not really, if they didnt die back then, they would bomb civlians in Syria & Ukraine today.
Remarkably, one of its crew of 4 survived!
And then that pilot got mobilized 😂.
R.i.p the pilots
It Is a terrible crash,i can understand wath happed
@@CoffeeAndPaulyeah like United 232 184 survived
@@vnsworkshop9961 the pilots survived
Poor visibility, lands too hard and too fast. The cockpit section breaks off and the rear (wings) of the plane get airborne briefly before crashing. 3 of 4 people on board were killed in the crash. The survivor ejected.
At which point does the survivor eject? I can't see sh*t there!
@@kicksnarehats11 1:25
Did he land in the snow and roll?
@@flyboieblair6636, yeah, it looks like he did. Of course where he was rolling toward there's a gigantic Russian "JP5" inferno now burning. I'm sure that was quite a sight to as you're sliding right at it.
Those engines still going!!
That's what I was thinking, too.
Crazy how quiet it gets once the engines smash down at 1:31
R.I.P :( God give strong strenght to their families... So sad...
And this is why landing minimums exist.
minimum speeds?
@@Riley77777, minimum weather. These are strategic bombers, not Piper Cubs. They have literally no forward visibility when they're landing because the nose is so long. The nose wheel lights may have made visibility worse, too, reflecting off the falling snow.
Weather was the contributor for this mishap. May the departed rest in peace 🙏
@Fred Garvin Man is really butthurt
Nooooo really?
How very perceptive.
RyanAir is like " Hold my Beer."
according to wikipedia one of the Crew members survived.
Ok that’s good... but HOW?!?
@@DeanTheDeadRose I'd Imagine he was Up in the cockpit section as that split away from the rest of the Aircraft that exploded.
@@COUNTERCOM all of the crew in this aircraft are in the same cockpit
@@Spooky_32 what about the tail Gunner?
@@DeanTheDeadRose : Luck.
Poor visibility due to heavy snow..... Fast and Hard landing breaks the cockpit part and engines are still working 😭 Condolences to all the family's who lost their love ones
Yes, we all seen it mate.
That thing desended so fast.
@Fred Garvin ruclips.net/video/aPs3PZvMlZE/видео.html (like this?)
You can hear them try to power up before landing once they realized they were coming into hard. Too late... very sad.
@Fred Garvin ruclips.net/video/aPs3PZvMlZE/видео.html (Look at that thats just patchetic)
Wonder if a more modern construction would have survived the landing. I know the video can't really give a realistic picture of the extreme forces a bomber jet must endure during touching the ground with higher than expected vertical speed, but still - the nose and cockpit broke off like it was tin-soldered in it's place.
As far as I can understand construction, the bomber is not purposed to survive heavy G-forces. It should be able to carry tons of bombs and fuel, but under gentle handling. Notice that landing gears survived the initial touch, but because the whole construction allowed G is only 2.5G, the center section broken.
Тимофей Мягких maybe it was also overloaded by weight
The initial report of this mishap indicated that the ILS (Instrument Landing System) at the airfield was inoperative and as such, it is very likely that the pilots were being guided by what is known as a GCA (Ground Controlled Approach) which is a precision radar type approach assisted by the air traffic controllers on the ground. In this case it appears the pilot may have misjudged his glideslope (angle to the runway) and reduced power too much. This is indicated by the abnormally high sink rate (descent rate) which led to the high vertical impact which broke apart the aircraft (which no aircraft could have survived a landing with such a high descent rate). If this ends up being the case, it's likely the cause will be attributed to Pilot Error with contributing factors being the near zero visibility instrument meteorological conditions and lack of an operable ILS. Despite good training and experience of aircrews (regardless of their nation of origin), sadly such mishaps still happen from time to time.
No enlighted pistes there? No braking parachuttes at all? Overloaded bomber fly machins landings under this wind conditions should have been more carfully planned! RIP for the families!
wings are the plane strongest parts, fuselage not so much
Nobody told Russia the plane is supposed to be reused
Thanks for the video, can I politely say that if you edit out the first minute where nothing's happening it would get to the point of the video please, thanks a million😊
Руководителя полётами снять с должности, разжаловать и отправить подметать аэродром...
Вроде мультик.
❤
So sorry for the crew. RIP
1 survive tough
Обыкновенное "распиздяйство". Видно же что идут много выше глиссады! И очень высокая вертикальная скорость снижения. Дослужиться до майора и не знать "золотого летного правила": все полетные правила написаны кровью??? Тем более, посадка в сложных метеоусловиях требует особенной собранности и четкости действия всего экипажа...
..looks like die hard 2 from 1990 movie.
..they make a wrong altitude measurements for ILS landing system on LaGuardia Airport.
..but this Tupolev came in incredible vertical speed. These things don't get vertical altitude radar for landing ???
"come on flight blah blah, we gotcha, we gotcha..."
Actually it was Dulles International--not LaGuardia.
There was a problem with the ILS system and the Tu-22 was landing blind essentially
“SINK RATE. PULL UP”
ナイスランディング！
It's not nice! People died in this video!
@@zayyanhakim747 さん
いいえ､実にナイスです。
まぁ､時期はズレてますが､ウクライナに対する不当な軍事侵攻､そしてウクライナ各地での人の道を踏み外した蛮行･ジェノサイド等が無ければ私とてこのようなコメントはしませんがね。
この軍用機の乗務員が生きていれば､後のウクライナ侵攻で何十倍何百倍のウクライナ民間人を虐殺する訳です。
正直､ロシア兵が軍用機材取扱中に事故で落命する事には少しも同情出来ません。
@@user-ut6jl5ew4j i don't even understand Japanese!
@@zayyanhakim747 さん
私も殆ど同じです。英語はごく簡単な文章しか理解出来ません。
不謹慎やなぁ
why wasn’t this in the news and how many people died?
Those guys are speaking calmly in the face of a plane crash?
They're the russian military
They're used to things like this
@@tailendcharlie9623 bullshit
@@secundus6457 Explore the RuAF air accident statistics prior to hanging stigmatizing labels plz.
It looks awefully alot like a big RC.
Maybe drunk?
one lived amazingly. i don't know how.
Probably drunk. Ever notice how drunk drivers always seem to survive in crashes?
Светотехническое оборудование аэродрома отсутствует, погода явно ниже минимума экипажа! Царствие небесное экипажу!
Patah tulang 🗿ᮢᮡᮣᮁᮀᮂ 👌
very high approch speed
@CaptHawkeye Not really! High vertical speed.
speed was too low
@@mikhailjairnisbett441high approach speed caused bounce on landing point , the bounce caused damage.
@@Dimi_Blacklol hhhhhhh
@@tatemwander1874 if the approach speed was high, the airplane would have been hard to put down. In this case, the approach speed was too low and the vertical sink rate was too much, which did not give the airplane enough time or lift to pull out. Source: pilot
Wow
When the captain says the landing might be a bit bumpy
How can you see in these conditions russia needs to develop thermal camera hud
По-больше бы такого!)
интересно чему ты злорадствуешь
Погиб экипаж, погибла птица
비상탈출 시스템이 없나요?
W
Temendo!
That was a hArD lAnDinG
I think they came in a little hot.
YA THINK!?
Pilots?
Why is some dude out in that just hand-held recording a landing entry
He is naming plane number and pilot name at the start of the video. So he is one of servicemen of that bomber squadron I assume. And he is filming landing in the heaviest weather condition just for his own purpose, why not?
Because he knew he was about to witness a fiery crash in no visibility.
RIP guys
I feel soooo sorry for people who become bombers, nationality does not matter, while their country is in peace... I mean not attacked.
Being ripped apart by an explosion or burning while still alive is not funny either inside or outside a bomber.
right, and when their country is not in peace, they can just bomb the shit out of other people so that they are ripped apart by an explosion or burning while still alive. Would you feel less sorry, then? RIP to the crew member though, and condolences to the family, but I just don't get your narrative.
@@akvyr When someone is listed to be a bomber, then it's not a choice: it's his cross.
@@lxathu While there is conscription in some countries, I doubt anyone has been forced into a bomber's seat. It's a personal choice to stay in the military after a year, and get into this prestigious position.
@@akvyr In a country at war one has a great chance to get enlisted sooner or later. "I volunteered to get a proper and a slightly bigger chance to survive rather than be made a member of the mass to the meat grinder" is an ever appearing thought in memoirs. It's not a pretty ideal, just an acceptable excuse of someone who has but one life. (Catch 22 describes this pretty well.)
In peace, being a mercenary and dropping anything loaded in onto people, that's what I take a quite different situation. That's when the respectful and mournful unknown soldier becomes a disgraceful assassin.
@@akvyr What?! Most pilots try out to be jet fighter pilots; however, many do not make it because of various requirements & health needed to become fighter pilot. The men who do not make fighter pilot cut are then given choice to fly cargo, bomber, ISR, tanker jets, etc...
😱
Could someone translate what the camera man was saying
At the start: Plane number 35, major Gur'yev, landing.
Around 1:20: blyat'...
Then: Should I continue filming?
Next: Yes, it crashed.
Last one: Welp, should we go there?
Lucaas: "Luckily, no one was injured."
Lol
Sink rate
Ryanair: What a Smooth Landing
People: You killed the people on board I'm blaming you.
TMRD AW (PNU) AR for the OK fatality.
1:23 Rip tu-22
You're thinking of the older Tu-22 AKA "Flying Liquor Truck" AKA "Supersonic Booze Carrier".
This is a Tu-22M. It's a different plane, about... 15 Years younger??
RUclips channel 'Paper Skies' has a hilarious & very interesting video about the old Tu-22. Check it out, it'll be worth your time!
Is The Pilot Survived ?
No
Tow injured and tow killed
So unfortunate. Condolences to the grieved families.Om Shanti.
Może zahaczył o brzozę?
Ask your pilot.
The front fell off.
F
No ejection?
cockpit flipped , can't eject into ground
1 survive from ejection. 3 dead
1:25 The Cockpit
I believe there's an ejection at 1:26, rocket-propelled object leaves the cockpit as it tumbles in flames - going off the left of the view curving slightly upwards - accompanied by rocket whoosh and doppler-shift sound that is the opposite of the rest of the sounds.
edit: this may not have been surviveable or even commanded by the aircrew - could have just been the seat ejecting due to being triggered.
Can’t eject at that altitude because the parachutes won’t open.
I thought this was a passenger jet...
Even the Russians wouldn't land a civilian airliner in those conditions.
Also, people say that the ILS assistance on this jet was down due to a ground control problem? so what we may have watched is a Russian bomber commander saying "let's wing it".
The official Russian crash investigation claims it was pilot error but this is Russia sooooo...
... probably a combo of half ground control problems, half airframe metal fatigue, & half pilots.
on voit bien qu il arrive trop vite , dommage je suis sincerement desole car ce sont les russe qui ont sauver les siryens des mains des egorgeurs
Нихрена же не видно, как садиться в такую погоду? Хоть бы полосу подсветили.
Есть автоматика и море приборов. Но если мозгов нет, то получается именно так.
@@E266PD ну ты бы конечно посадил в любую погоду по приборам, никто же не сомневается.
@@user-pb6qm1lp2v мальчик, я всю жизнь в авиации, с 17-ти и до пенсии. Что ты в этом понимаешь, клоун?
@@E266PD Заслуженный ты наш пенсионер, свисти девочкам на лавочке, а не тем, кто действительно был в авиации. И выбирай слэнг, если общаешься с незнакомыми людьми.
@@user-pb6qm1lp2v если бы ты был в авиации, то знал бы что вдоль полосы дохрена огней, которые видно в любом тумане и знал бы, что автоматика (РСБН-ПКВ и система посадки Ось-1) ведет именно этот самолет почти до полосы, до 40м. Полностью ручного управления на этом самолете нет. Так что при такой автоматике грохнуть самолет, имея второго пилота и штурмана, который обязан контролировать все параметры посадки это талант. Ты или сопливый двоечник, или водило таскал на аэродроме.
Отлетались
normal katastrof
Hey that's not supposed to happen!
Это что , аэродром стратегической авиации или заброшенное колхозное поле ?
It looks like a suicide attempt more than a landing. But visibility is almost none. It must have been very hard to navigate this giant thing
😂😂😂
Now i know why they call it the "Backfire"
Crew should have ejected
They couldn't, they could have killed themselves anyway by ejecting into the ground, and their instruments weren't giving accurate readings, so they thought that they still had time
Ejection speed is about 120 km/h minimum. Cockpit detaches with pyrobolts, but should be blown away with an airflow. And mind the delay for crew for making decision for ejection.
If ejecting below 200 feet, a minimum speed of 80 mph must be maintained. Otherwise, the parachutes may not have enough time to open before hitting the ground. Plus, this happened so quickly; I doubt they had any time.
Hahahaha co za złom
It will buff out, and my Dad has an awesome set of tools in his garage we can borrow.
前輪がうしろすぎるのかもなぁ
前輪着いてませんでした
RUSSIAN SUPERIORITY!
La vodka fait des dégâts
very good
i like planes
@Sylver The Private Aviator because i like planes
@Sylver The Private Aviator and you should not tell other people what they should or shouldn't do
@Sylver The Private Aviator go cry a river you little precious snowflake celandine
😞
Он приземлялся слишком быстро, его потеряла бравада, искренняя симпатия.
No lo se Rick párese falso
Pasadka nie wyszła.
Thats Russia.
I wonder if the videographer ever thought about actually helping...
What do you want him to do? Pat the fire out with his hands?
Un avion russe qui se crashe c'est un pléonasme
How in hell is this a pleonasm?
А мог бы убивать мирных в Мариуполе.
What a shitty plane, the nose falls off when you land it...
At this decending rate and speed EVERY AIRCRAFT will disintegrate!😜
Built with Chinese metal
Moron
سلاح خرده 🤣🤣🤣🤣
BAHLUL
حتى هذا الذي تعتبرها خردة لا يستطيع بلدك أن يصنع برغي ولا صامولة منها يا طويل اللسان.
Russian pilot's are perfect 😂
panzer nato haha funny to your fucking asshole
Too much weight for landing , RIP
Раньше я бы выразил соболезнования. Но теперь понимаю, что если бы этого не произошло, эти мрази тоже бомбили бы Украину.
Stains
Имея столько приборов, автоматический заход, радиовысотомер, вариометр, указатель скорости, двух пилотов и так грохнуться, это надо иметь талант.
указатель скорости мог отказать.
@@cosmopolit-ne-evreiy у штурмана свой указатель. Штурман обязан контролировать все параметры на посадке. Экипаж должен работать слаженно.
@@E266PD может отказать обмерзнуть и основной и дополнительный , и всё , пиндец.
Вручную его практически невозможно посадить как ты говоришь.
Если бы обмерз, то это проявилось бы раньше. В таких случаях сажают с помощью лидера. Был у нас похожий случай в 80-е. Зам комполка вылетел и вел за собой самолет по глиссаде, вернее даже раньше, где то с высоты 2 км. Там вообще все барометрические приборы отказали. Но всё закончилось благополучно. Правда самолет был другой МиГ-23М @@cosmopolit-ne-evreiy
Вот она "военная угроза" , во всей красе. Нашли кого бояться, лузеров.
Absolutely hilarious. I bet the B1 Lancer can't do this 🤣orc technology at its finest. Plus, one less flight crew to bomb innocent countries 👍🏻
🤡
Non le bombardier b1 américain a eu aussi sa part de crash. C'est une erreur de pilotage et conditions météo. L'avion tu-22 n'est pas à soupçonné.