Sec 144 BNSS vs. Sec 125 CRPC: Legal Insights

[@AdvRashmiVohra]

Hmm 😮

[@lawnotesacademy]

🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@thefortuneroaster439]

Informative 👍

[@lawnotesacademy]

Thanks 🙏🏻

[@sumitaverma1829]

👍

[@lawnotesacademy]

Thanks 🙏🏻

[@sandhyakumari3532]

Very nice informative 🙂

[@lawnotesacademy]

Thanks so much 🙏🏻

[@Consult-u5o]

Good info 🎉

[@lawnotesacademy]

Thanks 🙏🏻

[@vohrahardik]

Informative🫢

[@lawnotesacademy]

Thanks 🙏🏻

[@pampakundu7508]

❤

[@lawnotesacademy]

Thanks so much 🙏🏻

[@nilpasheth4639]

Tx mam...but 9 years k doughter kar sakti hai case agains father

[@lawnotesacademy]

Yes
Under guardian of mother or any other guardian

[@ashwanikumar2187]

Helpful information 👍🏻

[@lawnotesacademy]

Thanks 🙏🏻

[@lachhmansingh3186]

agar father kharcha dega feer bache bhi father ke pass hi rhane chahiye andha kanoon hai yeh

[@lawnotesacademy]

7 yrs se above bachhe reh sakte hain father k pass

[@lawnotesacademy]

Specifically boys

[@AkashRana003]

To baccho pr bhi sirf or sirf baap kia hi adhikaar hona chahiye

[@lawnotesacademy]

Yes right 👍🏻

[@hungryTomotivation]

Madam ji ak case bata dijiye jisme wife pati aur bachho ko maintain kar rahi ho bas pati disable nahi hona chahiye please 🙏

[@lawnotesacademy]

6. Nivya V M v. Shivaprasad M K (2017),
before the Kerala High Court, a woman was ordered to pay Rs. 6,000 as monthly maintenance to her husband. The reason behind this order was her false allegation of rape against him in the Family Court, which adversely affected his career.
Facts of the Case:
The petitioner (Nivya V M) and the respondent (Shivaprasad M K) married on January 31, 2011, with the marriage recorded at Enmakaje.
Their relationship became strained, leading to legal proceedings.
The petitioner filed for dissolution of marriage under Section 13(i)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging cruelty by the respondent.
The respondent, working in a financial institution, was falsely accused of abduction and rape by the petitioner.
The respondent resigned due to the false news published in Malayala Manorama daily.
The petitioner also filed a complaint against the respondent under various sections of the Indian Penal Code.
The respondent was unemployed and had health issues, while the petitioner was an Assistant Professor earning Rs. 50,000 per month.

[@AkashRana003]

Isi liye to ye aurte bacche ko le kr bhagti hai

[@lawnotesacademy]

Yes

[@ajitpalsingh8552]

father hma 24 main wife se maintainance mange fir kyon ki agar husband kam nahi kar rahe to wife ki nhi responsibility banti hai akale hasband hi responsibale nahi hai purush hi kyon pise raha hai har taraf se kanoon bahut acha hai par jankari ki kami hai agar husband pay kar raha hai to custody kyon nahi deti court jara ruko or thande dimag se socho kya ho raha hai ap ke case main kahi illigal to nahi kar rahi court age bado supreme court main hi justice milega

[@lawnotesacademy]

Nahi aisa nahi hai
Not same in every case
Kahin kahin husband bhi waise se maintenance le raha hai
Or le bhi sakta hai agar wife ki income bohot Achha hai or husband ki bohot kam
To wife bhi bachchon or husband ko maintain Kr sakti hai

[@hungryTomotivation]

​@@lawnotesacademy
Madam ji ak case bata dijiye jisme wife pati aur bachho ko maintain kar rahi ho bas pati disable nahi hona chahiye please

[@lawnotesacademy]

@hungryTomotivation dekhiye jahan husband k pass solid reason hota hai job na karne ka or wife ki achhi income hoti hai
Us case me husband wife se maintenance le sakta hai

[@lawnotesacademy]

@hungryTomotivation Mai Apko case law de dungi isse related

[@rishigoel71]

We have to fight the wife's parents as wife's parents r spoiling the husband life

[@maheshpanwar7936]

बहुत गलत जजमेंट दिया है

[@lawnotesacademy]

Yes aisa hi hai
Kya Kr sakte hain 🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@SandeepSaini-je7tk]

Ye galat hai

[@lawnotesacademy]

Court ki judgement hai