So basically the curse has shifted from the filmmakers not caring about the source material to the consumers not caring about the quality because all they want is 2 billion references to the games
After the large amount of movies based on video games that weren't at all faithful to the source material I don't blame people in the slightest for caring more about fidelity to the source material and references than anything else. And these movies aren't even bad anyway.
And shitty reference too, for instance there was no music from SA1 snow cap in the 2nd sonic movie as they were snowboarding, or city escape. Like wtr😢
Instead of taking the source material and add a couple of their ideas(since everyone wanna put their "spin" on it) theyre tryna make their own idea and add a little source material. If that make sense. Its annoying af.
I strongly agree. My friends are gamers, and I'm currently a film major. I've always judged films as films. When I said Mario was just a mediocre film, and they said the same thing, "it's Mario. It's not gonna be deep. " My response was,"Yeah, but I expected a film. Plus, there are other animated films that do what this film's premise does, but better." Maybe the online discourse effected the way I viewed the film. I found both sides insufferable. I understand both sides, but I'm in my own lane.
Discussing cinema with my gamer friends is nearly impossible. Some of them took film classes in college, and yet all they seem to care about is faithfulness to the source material. I don't get it.
@MitchLmitten / that's how it was for me as well. While I did find some of it slightly amusing, I was just staring at the theater screen with a vacant stare while my friends were smiling and stuff.
@@mitchlmitten5874 Can you blame them? Because I don't, after the large amount of movies based on video games that weren't at all faithful to the source material I don't blame your friends in the slightest for caring more about fidelity to the source material than anything else.
@@scottchaison1001 they expected a film-film, not a film based on a simplistic video game franchise; a film produced entirely as a parcel of entertainment to be consumed. Nintendo wanted a product that children would consume en masse, and that's what they got. They were not interested in creating the next Toy Story . if they were, they would have done something like maybe a Paper Mario movie...
Well said. All that matters to most of these fans is that they watch a "faithful" adaptation of the IP, instead of actually *adapting* that IP to work on its own as a strong cinematic narrative. I don't see why they can't have a Sonic or Mario movie that actually looks like the games while still telling a compelling story.
This is precisely why I think the FNAF movie, which is a deeply mediocre if not awful movie, got so much praise and love. Because, man, if the setting and monster dont look exactly like the source material. That's all people wanted, and that's all they got. Sufficient apparently.
I had a really great time with the Mario movie. I didn't need a deeper story or characters to enjoy something that colorful and fast paced, yet I also acknowledge that if it had those things it likely would have been even better and there is nothing wrong with advocating for these films improving even if you did like them.
I liked the movies a lot (I haven't seen the Mario one). They aren't great 'films' though in terms of writing. I totally get why some people didn't enjoy it.
Man, I felt like I was going crazy hating on the Mario movie while everyone seems to just think it's fine, "it's just a kids' animation". This video really hit what was on my mind that I couldn't comprehend.
This video is really well spot on! Nowadays you can’t just criticise a movie because of how toxic and Self entitled many of these fandoms are. Like it’s a personal attack if someone doesn’t get it or doesn’t likes it and complains about the movie and they get mad at that person just for expressing their opinion “LIKE JESUS FREAKING CHRIST IT’S JUST SOMEONES FREAKING OPINION ABOUT A MOVIE CHILL THE FREAK DOWN!!!”
My experience is almost completely different. The majority of the bad ones are mostly big theater Hollywood releases. Meanwhile there are still alot of amazing ones out there, even before Tlou. Some of my favorites are: Detention 2019, Ace Attorney 2012, Professor Layton & the eternal Diva, Street fighter 2 1994, Cyberpunk: Edgerunners, Fate shows (0 & Unlimited blade works), Fsn: Heaven's feel trilogy, Shenmue, Street fighter V2 show, Arcane, Mkl: Scorpion's revenge, Castlevania, Werewolves within & Gangs of London. There's alot more out there.
I fear the Mario will become the norm in term of video game adaptation in Hollywood, with everyone putting out low effort movies of which only feat is to rub the viewer with very obvious and very obnoxious Easter eggs and references (especially with Mario Movie's financial success). People can say whatever they want about the MCU , but they did a far better job at introducing the audience to the characters than neither Mario or FNAF ever tried to . I didn't need to read every issue of every Thor comics in order to know who is and what he's about , I didn't need to know the "lore" of Guardians of the Galaxy in order to be invested ; but it seems that in order to enjoy the Mario movie , I did .
its money. its always fucking money. a movie can have an absolute dogshit story with barely any character and substance. but that doesnt make a difference if the movie exceeds a billion dollars. everyone producer and director will want to try and copy off of it. you have no idea how much that pisses me off.
I think the true issue is that we've seen better. What these films did, the fans have made better. Any movies that are made, we've seen fan animations that are way funnier and more interesting. I'd even argue FlashGitz's Mario animation is more cohesive than the actual movie. Voice acting? Juno Songs already outdid Chris Pratt, Charlie Day, Jack Black, and Keegan Michael-Key just by singing as those characters. I'd argue Juno's impressions are nigh-unmatchable. The only guy who can match Juno as Bowser is Darby Cupit. Granted, some animations and fan content are HEAVILY diverged from their sources, but they never failed to be interesting and fun while also being cohesive and faithful. Overall, movies have to be better than what the fans made, even if on a relative scale.
Superhero movies and comic book readers are guilty of this too. While narration isn't much of an issue since comic books are story driven by default, execution is still an issue with some of these movies. Gamers and comic book readers I think are similar in that they enjoy things too much or take fictional narratives a bit too seriously than they really should. Then you just have toxic fans who either spread toxic negativity where they have forced hate on good things or in this case toxic positivity where they don't welcome criticism or room for improvement. I think the issue is that gamers when they see a faithful movie on something that not many others are familiar with they don't acknowledge that not everyone plays video games or are fans of Mario, Sonic or Pokemon. They don't acknowledge that these vast majority aren't into what they're into which gives some validation to the critics of the Mario movie despite the audience winning over. There's always room for improvement. Perfection is an illusion. What you consider perfect may not seem perfect to someone else. Episodes 4 and 5 Star Wars still have their flaws but no one ever acknowledges them, and if that's the case but they criticize other aspects of Star Wars like the prequels and sequels but not the originals then I don't think that's fair. EDIT: But now that I mentioned Star Wars, especially for any other toxic fandoms (like the Sonic games), who cares about advocacy really. Fans, especially toxic fans are selfish and don't care about anyone who isn't a fan of what they love. They automatically view them as people who are not of their religion and whenever they hear something that they don't want to hear or doesn't match with their opinions they take as a personal insult as if they register anything as an objective direct threat to whatever they love or interests are in. They take criticism as someone telling them that what they love is wrong. Liking or enjoying something that's mediocre or can be improved upon, or liking a garbage movie means that there is something medically wrong with you. That's the mindset of these toxic people.
I get the point of the video, saying our personal attachments or feelings to whatever particular brands shouldn't stop us from engaging with media critically. And that we could be better at articulate our thoughts rather than dismiss any attempts to have a deeper conversation. I get this as a universal principle to live by, but simultaneously I also don't fault ppl for sometimes just wanna turn their brains off and enjoy stuff, especially when it comes to children's media/their childhood memories. And yes there's always gonna be ppl being a dick insisting if sth was never meant to be taken seriously then its never ought to be, but that's just the internet, and the implied absolute prioritization of one approach over another just seems to be missing nuance in this case. Overall I still enjoyed the video and get sth out of it so kudos nonetheless. Can't wait for the FNAF review.
I love how the fragments that you use in your video from the movies aren't random, but instead each one of them illustrate what you're saying. You talk about how people verbally attack otherw and show a scene of Sonic fighting, and not just that one but the whole video essay is like that. Awesome attention to detail!
Video game movies now harbour blatant fanboyism and whining than actually treating the movies like movies, because that is what critics came from, and it is what the filmmakers should do. It's incredibly toxic and mindnumbing with blanket arguments to dodge criticism.
tbh i could honestly get behind the sonic movie, even as someone that didn't care about the franchise beforehand, bc it had like, an actual plot with a theme, even if it was pretty simple and surface level, plus i liked the casting by contrast, i was one of mario's most passionate fans in my childhood, and i was heavily disappointed by the movie for basically being a corporate vehicle with nothing going for it besides "look at le funee referens on the skrin", and the controversy made it even worse but yeah, i do agree on how the bar's so low that anything better than dogshit will be treated as the second coming of christ, and even might have been guilty of participating in another sonic 2 controversy, and looking back i do regret my actions back then and wish to become better now also you're so based for referencing sophia lillis' nancy drew at 3:58
A new curse? 👀 I'm intrigued. Arlo still got information wrong regarding the Sonic characters and the second movie. He can express his dislike for the movie, but at least do the research first. This is just me, but I feel like the way fans reacted to critics with the Mario Movie is way WORSE than with the Sonic Movie 2! Aside from that, I agree with your assessment!
really good video, however id like to point out a couple things the defensiveness of those fans, while very annoying and yes makes them terrible advocates, may come from the other side you didnt mention, which is the side of the fanbase that gatekeeps those fans who are chill and dont do anything wrong and tell them they're stupid or bootlickers of a company for saying the movie you think is mediocre in your opinion, good this causes those fans to feel like they need to be defensive in order to get the point across that they aren't what they're being considered, and while yes everyone can just brush off a stranger on the internets opinion, everyone's brain works in many MANY different ways, and therefore the person who called mario, sonic, or detective pikachu good may actually not have been defensive and very chill until they were insulted, always better to look at both sides to understand the bigger picture obviously however, i can very clearly tell you arent implying no one can find these movies good, that would be a huge reach on my part, so dont think im saying you fall under the "this fan is stupid for praising the mario movie" but just keep in mind someone saying mario movie had beautiful shots was dogged on and told to watch more movies, the other side is very much just as vicious, and that's the scary part of online discourse there's always such a thing as sides, you're either incredibly dismissive of criticism and claim the IP as a loyal brand defender, or you're so cynical that you feel the need to assume that just because someone thought higher of a film than you did, that automatically somehow makes the person dumb and not a true fan because the movie is believed to be of "mediocre quality" again no attack towards you and your video was really good! just providing some further insight
It’s like, I know many indie games that would be super interesting to turn into a movie, but for the big triple A properties… I‘ve never finished Titanfall 2 but BT saying “I’m not losing another pilot” is a moment that NEEDS to be seen on the big screen live action. If a tiny moment like that can inspire me from a SHOOTER whose creators just wanted to make “Gundams but not deep” (not that shooters can’t be art but some of them are just toys especially when people only care about the multiplayer) THEN WHAT ABOUT THE GAMES WHERE THE STORY IS THE FOCUS AND IT’S FUCKING AMAZING. What about games that create a huge lore like League of Legends!? Arcane has already proven that stuff is PRIME source material! They’re not all digital toys people! If you believe they are art then say it deserves to be adapted like it IS ART!
I think this video is weird because the behavior you're talking about is specific to not video games, I'm not sure why it is inherent to video games and more to fandom culture. It isn't inherent to video games when this happens whenever a DCEU movie is out. You should have called this fandoms are cursed not video game movies, and include your video game movies afterwards.
Were goombas even in the Mario movie??? Also I think for me the old Mario movie would stick with memory wise more than the new Mario movie because with the new one the Penguins mislead me heavily in their role in the movie while realistic Yoshi getting stabby stabbed just hits different and is always in the back of my head lol
I agree to a certain extent, but the truth is that I prefer the previous state of video game movies. I prefer street fighter or the old mario bros, and not in an elitist sense ("secretly they are great gems of cinema" or some such nonsense). I just think these are movies that took certain risks, and failed. The current situation seems to be playing it safe, repeating it thousands of times. Maybe that's why (and my complete emotional detachment from brands) is that I find them bland, indisputably "correct". Films that do nothing but exist: they are correctly written, correctly filmed... but they leave me absolutely nothing, neither during nor after.
I don't know what's the point of being risk-taking movies if they do it abysmally poorly. I prefer a good safe movie that is fun and entertaining from start to finish, to one that is not faithful to the source material and pretends to be more than what it really is and failing miserably in the attempt.
i absolutely hold a certain sense of appreciation for the LSD-induced chimera that was the 1994 Mario Bros movie. I don't see how the old Street Fighter did anything "risky" tho?
I don't know if I would call any of those movies risky. How they turned out was partially because the people behind them were trying to appeal towards a broader audience.
The fast pacing is for the cocomelon brain rotted kids of today. They can't watch a scene for 20 seconds and connect it to a scene that happened a half hour ago..it just has to be flashy and distracting and move quickly or kids won't watch 🥴
go watch the kids movies from your childhood. they were fast paced too. it's just how kid's movies are. most Disney movies are like 70 minutes and everything happens so fast
Something you should keep in mind when looking ar people's reactions to these films is the stories found in their respective source materials. With pokemon there's a 50/50 chance a story will be memorable or underwhelming, outside of a sub series mario stories are lacking in depth by desing, and when the first sonic movie came out the stories for the games weren't being well received even by long time fans. So when asking the question of why certain fans can be so defensive of these films, the answer you should consider is that the quality of writting found in said movies are exactly what several fans expected and wanted.
So my issue with these movies. Btw ive only actually seen the detective pikachu one so ill start there. I dont like the idea of people calling this the first pokemon movie. Its not. Pokemon has an anime thats almost as old as the games themselves and is still running. The anime has some incredible movies to go with it too. Detective pikachu is a decent movie about the shittiest spinoff game in the series. And this is coming from a fan of the property. I still buy and enjoy every mainline game. I own many of the spinoffs and love em. I also collect the cards and watched the anime as a kid. And remember seeing the first movie in theatres and crying. Pokemon as a whole means a lot to me and has been a huge part of my life. The detective pikachu movie was ok. It was funny and the pokemon themselves i think looked phenomenal. The story was ok. And thats fine. As for mario and sonic. Ive heard good things. Im not a fan of sonic. I grew up in a nintendo home. So im more familiar with mario. But neither game is really rich in lore or story. So i do find it silly to expect masterpieces out of these movies. They are silly blockbusters for children to like at in awe. I hope someday some good directors can take some more story heavy games and make some incredible movies out of them like i know can be posible with the right material. There are so many games out there that are essentially playable movies already. Those are the ones that need this. Not sonic and mario.
Ok, I get your point, but using Arlo's video was a bad example. People weren't mad at his opinion, they were upset because the video was poorly made. He nitpicked, he went on tagents, he contradicted himself, and he complained about the dumbest things. I think a better example to prove your point would be with LS Mark's video on it
@@scottchaison1001 No, all of them. No, Pokémon game except maybe, MAYBE, Legends Arceus is a good video game. Pokémon games since Red and, Green have been low effort, low skill, glitch fest that only get to continue gasping for air because, nostalgia and, nostalgia alone, to a low effort anime staring Ash and, Pikachu.
I think people miss the idea that the criticisms about the “flaws” are missing the actual point of the movie what you want to movie to be isn’t what matters it’s whether the movie caters to the audience it’s appealing to you can dislike it but the movies isn’t bad or mid if it’s like by it’s target audience as the one who didn’t like it you either A. Weren’t the target audience B. Missed the point of what the movie is or C. Just don’t like it my opinion is if you over analyze the Mario movie that’s on you not the movie it’s Mario expecting something always puts you at fault if you can admit you found it fine because you aren’t a fan of the original you instantly do far more to help the discourse than to state it’s just “bad” with no context
If I went into your house an smashed the center of your Tv and told you to watch a movie. Then you complained that you don't understand the movie because your tv is smashed and I said well you're just not in the target audience for movies with smashed tv so you're criticisms don't matter. Would you accept that.
Subjective criticism exists on a person-to-person basis. You can make the same argument you did anytime anyone dislikes anything. So what’s the point? Why bother having the conversation? You’re fundamentally not understanding what it means to experience art on a level beyond mere consumption. You missed the entire point of the video. Also please use some punctuation.
well, it was an extremely loose adaptation------- and it kinda fucking sucked regardless. that said, i saw it on the premiere back in 2008, and not seen it since. i definitely need to rewatch it lol.
@@SirArthurTheGreat The entire video. Rodger Ebert layed out a clear argument, and then MeepTop re-explained what Eberts argument was NOT, and argued against the argument MeepTop created FOR Ebert.
i get that some fans can be crazy defensive but i take far larger issue with people who ARENT fans of something dedicating effort to invade online spaces where actual fans of something want to come together to enjoy something they alone in their individual living situations find happiness in. like bffr, who are any of us to gatekeep “enjoyment” by using subjective concepts such as “quality” or “exceptionalism” as a metric for whether fans should enjoy or blindly defend a piece of media? on a consumer level, if something sucks it will generate insufficient fans to continue making profit. those who dont like that thing will be rewarded by seeing less like it be produced into the world. there is a time place and space for critical reviews of something and there is a time place and space for subjective fandom worship stupidness. such is being human. to love something despite its flaws. for some these “mid” adaptations may be personally special so they get defensive because everytime they see something pertaining to this thing its just negative and draining of all love. cinemasins is cool but cinemawins is refreshing af.. personally think det.pikachu it’s a trash adaptation that spits in the face of pokemon fans for an interesting narrative that’s lazily written i think super mario bros (haven’t seen) is a mid adaptation, cartoon adaptations have been done and are good so it’s not breaking new ground in the “live action” sense. im waiting for a live action mario movie to further that thought. haven’t seen it yet so idk as an actual movie.. and i think sonic is a great adaptation so far. i think it’s great they seem to be telling a version of sonics actual origin that somewhat aligns with the games. i only played a few and never for the story so this all is new for me and im while critical of the movie happy it exists and want to see it continue. all 3 can be criticized for the sake of improvement but keep the hate for entertainment to the bare minimum. its like mcu humor, just everywhere in every thing all the time..
"Acceptable has become exceptional" - I'm gonna use the shit out of this quote. Great video!
Granted, considering the landscape of the film industry nowadays: acceptable is HIGHLY above average!
So basically the curse has shifted from the filmmakers not caring about the source material to the consumers not caring about the quality because all they want is 2 billion references to the games
I mean kinda, the films are certainly getting better at least
After the large amount of movies based on video games that weren't at all faithful to the source material I don't blame people in the slightest for caring more about fidelity to the source material and references than anything else. And these movies aren't even bad anyway.
And shitty reference too, for instance there was no music from SA1 snow cap in the 2nd sonic movie as they were snowboarding, or city escape. Like wtr😢
But thats not true though
Instead of taking the source material and add a couple of their ideas(since everyone wanna put their "spin" on it) theyre tryna make their own idea and add a little source material. If that make sense. Its annoying af.
I strongly agree. My friends are gamers, and I'm currently a film major. I've always judged films as films. When I said Mario was just a mediocre film, and they said the same thing, "it's Mario. It's not gonna be deep. " My response was,"Yeah, but I expected a film. Plus, there are other animated films that do what this film's premise does, but better." Maybe the online discourse effected the way I viewed the film. I found both sides insufferable. I understand both sides, but I'm in my own lane.
Discussing cinema with my gamer friends is nearly impossible. Some of them took film classes in college, and yet all they seem to care about is faithfulness to the source material. I don't get it.
@MitchLmitten / that's how it was for me as well. While I did find some of it slightly amusing, I was just staring at the theater screen with a vacant stare while my friends were smiling and stuff.
@@aarontoland8015 "but I expected a film", and that's what you got, I don't know what are you talking about.
@@mitchlmitten5874 Can you blame them? Because I don't, after the large amount of movies based on video games that weren't at all faithful to the source material I don't blame your friends in the slightest for caring more about fidelity to the source material than anything else.
@@scottchaison1001 they expected a film-film, not a film based on a simplistic video game franchise; a film produced entirely as a parcel of entertainment to be consumed.
Nintendo wanted a product that children would consume en masse, and that's what they got. They were not interested in creating the next Toy Story . if they were, they would have done something like maybe a Paper Mario movie...
Well said. All that matters to most of these fans is that they watch a "faithful" adaptation of the IP, instead of actually *adapting* that IP to work on its own as a strong cinematic narrative. I don't see why they can't have a Sonic or Mario movie that actually looks like the games while still telling a compelling story.
Damn Telekinesticman watches meep!
This is precisely why I think the FNAF movie, which is a deeply mediocre if not awful movie, got so much praise and love. Because, man, if the setting and monster dont look exactly like the source material. That's all people wanted, and that's all they got. Sufficient apparently.
I had a really great time with the Mario movie. I didn't need a deeper story or characters to enjoy something that colorful and fast paced, yet I also acknowledge that if it had those things it likely would have been even better and there is nothing wrong with advocating for these films improving even if you did like them.
I enjoyed all these films, but I entirely understand why someone else wouldn't like them.
I liked the movies a lot (I haven't seen the Mario one). They aren't great 'films' though in terms of writing. I totally get why some people didn't enjoy it.
But they aren't bad films in terms of writing either.
Man, I felt like I was going crazy hating on the Mario movie while everyone seems to just think it's fine, "it's just a kids' animation". This video really hit what was on my mind that I couldn't comprehend.
You’re still crazy
Feel free to go on about the FNAF movie it’s doomed for debate anyway amongst its own fandom
You predicted it
This video is really well spot on!
Nowadays you can’t just criticise a movie because of how toxic and Self entitled many of these fandoms are. Like it’s a personal attack if someone doesn’t get it or doesn’t likes it and complains about the movie and they get mad at that person just for expressing their opinion “LIKE JESUS FREAKING CHRIST IT’S JUST SOMEONES FREAKING OPINION ABOUT A MOVIE CHILL THE FREAK DOWN!!!”
My experience is almost completely different. The majority of the bad ones are mostly big theater Hollywood releases. Meanwhile there are still alot of amazing ones out there, even before Tlou. Some of my favorites are: Detention 2019, Ace Attorney 2012, Professor Layton & the eternal Diva, Street fighter 2 1994, Cyberpunk: Edgerunners, Fate shows (0 & Unlimited blade works), Fsn: Heaven's feel trilogy, Shenmue, Street fighter V2 show, Arcane, Mkl: Scorpion's revenge, Castlevania, Werewolves within & Gangs of London. There's alot more out there.
I fear the Mario will become the norm in term of video game adaptation in Hollywood, with everyone putting out low effort movies of which only feat is to rub the viewer with very obvious and very obnoxious Easter eggs and references (especially with Mario Movie's financial success).
People can say whatever they want about the MCU , but they did a far better job at introducing the audience to the characters than neither Mario or FNAF ever tried to .
I didn't need to read every issue of every Thor comics in order to know who is and what he's about , I didn't need to know the "lore" of Guardians of the Galaxy in order to be invested ; but it seems that in order to enjoy the Mario movie , I did .
its money. its always fucking money. a movie can have an absolute dogshit story with barely any character and substance. but that doesnt make a difference if the movie exceeds a billion dollars. everyone producer and director will want to try and copy off of it.
you have no idea how much that pisses me off.
I think the true issue is that we've seen better.
What these films did, the fans have made better.
Any movies that are made, we've seen fan animations that are way funnier and more interesting. I'd even argue FlashGitz's Mario animation is more cohesive than the actual movie.
Voice acting? Juno Songs already outdid Chris Pratt, Charlie Day, Jack Black, and Keegan Michael-Key just by singing as those characters. I'd argue Juno's impressions are nigh-unmatchable. The only guy who can match Juno as Bowser is Darby Cupit.
Granted, some animations and fan content are HEAVILY diverged from their sources, but they never failed to be interesting and fun while also being cohesive and faithful.
Overall, movies have to be better than what the fans made, even if on a relative scale.
Superhero movies and comic book readers are guilty of this too. While narration isn't much of an issue since comic books are story driven by default, execution is still an issue with some of these movies. Gamers and comic book readers I think are similar in that they enjoy things too much or take fictional narratives a bit too seriously than they really should. Then you just have toxic fans who either spread toxic negativity where they have forced hate on good things or in this case toxic positivity where they don't welcome criticism or room for improvement. I think the issue is that gamers when they see a faithful movie on something that not many others are familiar with they don't acknowledge that not everyone plays video games or are fans of Mario, Sonic or Pokemon. They don't acknowledge that these vast majority aren't into what they're into which gives some validation to the critics of the Mario movie despite the audience winning over. There's always room for improvement. Perfection is an illusion. What you consider perfect may not seem perfect to someone else. Episodes 4 and 5 Star Wars still have their flaws but no one ever acknowledges them, and if that's the case but they criticize other aspects of Star Wars like the prequels and sequels but not the originals then I don't think that's fair.
EDIT: But now that I mentioned Star Wars, especially for any other toxic fandoms (like the Sonic games), who cares about advocacy really. Fans, especially toxic fans are selfish and don't care about anyone who isn't a fan of what they love. They automatically view them as people who are not of their religion and whenever they hear something that they don't want to hear or doesn't match with their opinions they take as a personal insult as if they register anything as an objective direct threat to whatever they love or interests are in. They take criticism as someone telling them that what they love is wrong. Liking or enjoying something that's mediocre or can be improved upon, or liking a garbage movie means that there is something medically wrong with you. That's the mindset of these toxic people.
I get the point of the video, saying our personal attachments or feelings to whatever particular brands shouldn't stop us from engaging with media critically. And that we could be better at articulate our thoughts rather than dismiss any attempts to have a deeper conversation.
I get this as a universal principle to live by, but simultaneously I also don't fault ppl for sometimes just wanna turn their brains off and enjoy stuff, especially when it comes to children's media/their childhood memories. And yes there's always gonna be ppl being a dick insisting if sth was never meant to be taken seriously then its never ought to be, but that's just the internet, and the implied absolute prioritization of one approach over another just seems to be missing nuance in this case.
Overall I still enjoyed the video and get sth out of it so kudos nonetheless. Can't wait for the FNAF review.
I love how the fragments that you use in your video from the movies aren't random, but instead each one of them illustrate what you're saying. You talk about how people verbally attack otherw and show a scene of Sonic fighting, and not just that one but the whole video essay is like that. Awesome attention to detail!
Video game movies now harbour blatant fanboyism and whining than actually treating the movies like movies, because that is what critics came from, and it is what the filmmakers should do. It's incredibly toxic and mindnumbing with blanket arguments to dodge criticism.
You’re acting ridiculous
@@joshuawillis602lol cope harder child, literally proved his point
@@Spider-Man_234 no I didn’t. I just made an accurate observation of a fool. You seem to be no different.
Great video man! My favorite part is when sonic possibly kills thousands of people in the first movie by Emping the West coast.
Thank you for sharing this breath of fresh air with us.
tbh i could honestly get behind the sonic movie, even as someone that didn't care about the franchise beforehand, bc it had like, an actual plot with a theme, even if it was pretty simple and surface level, plus i liked the casting
by contrast, i was one of mario's most passionate fans in my childhood, and i was heavily disappointed by the movie for basically being a corporate vehicle with nothing going for it besides "look at le funee referens on the skrin", and the controversy made it even worse
but yeah, i do agree on how the bar's so low that anything better than dogshit will be treated as the second coming of christ, and even might have been guilty of participating in another sonic 2 controversy, and looking back i do regret my actions back then and wish to become better now
also you're so based for referencing sophia lillis' nancy drew at 3:58
A new curse? 👀 I'm intrigued. Arlo still got information wrong regarding the Sonic characters and the second movie. He can express his dislike for the movie, but at least do the research first. This is just me, but I feel like the way fans reacted to critics with the Mario Movie is way WORSE than with the Sonic Movie 2! Aside from that, I agree with your assessment!
he barely brought up sonic 2, it gave me the impression that he thought both 1 and 2 had the same quality which is frankly not the case at all.
@@slimgrim3607 2 is so much better than 1 in every sense of the word. Let's hope 3 will be even better
God! Love your videos, meetop! Thanks for making them!
12:56 Someone forgot about the Gran Turismo movie coming out in August.
3:22 why can’t we get our lord and saviour kaiji tang
Same. They are fine. Not great, not terrible, not really anything really. You watch them, then instantly forget about them.
EXACTLY!
really good video, however id like to point out a couple things
the defensiveness of those fans, while very annoying and yes makes them terrible advocates, may come from the other side you didnt mention, which is the side of the fanbase that gatekeeps those fans who are chill and dont do anything wrong and tell them they're stupid or bootlickers of a company for saying the movie you think is mediocre in your opinion, good
this causes those fans to feel like they need to be defensive in order to get the point across that they aren't what they're being considered, and while yes everyone can just brush off a stranger on the internets opinion, everyone's brain works in many MANY different ways, and therefore the person who called mario, sonic, or detective pikachu good may actually not have been defensive and very chill until they were insulted, always better to look at both sides to understand the bigger picture
obviously however, i can very clearly tell you arent implying no one can find these movies good, that would be a huge reach on my part, so dont think im saying you fall under the "this fan is stupid for praising the mario movie"
but just keep in mind someone saying mario movie had beautiful shots was dogged on and told to watch more movies, the other side is very much just as vicious, and that's the scary part of online discourse
there's always such a thing as sides, you're either incredibly dismissive of criticism and claim the IP as a loyal brand defender, or you're so cynical that you feel the need to assume that just because someone thought higher of a film than you did, that automatically somehow makes the person dumb and not a true fan because the movie is believed to be of "mediocre quality"
again no attack towards you and your video was really good! just providing some further insight
1:15 props to using the Persona 5 soundtrack
3:40 well those were popular genres at the time
11:54 - 12:03 thanks for the creepy vibe there XD
It’s like, I know many indie games that would be super interesting to turn into a movie, but for the big triple A properties… I‘ve never finished Titanfall 2 but BT saying “I’m not losing another pilot” is a moment that NEEDS to be seen on the big screen live action.
If a tiny moment like that can inspire me from a SHOOTER whose creators just wanted to make “Gundams but not deep” (not that shooters can’t be art but some of them are just toys especially when people only care about the multiplayer)
THEN WHAT ABOUT THE GAMES WHERE THE STORY IS THE FOCUS AND IT’S FUCKING AMAZING. What about games that create a huge lore like League of Legends!? Arcane has already proven that stuff is PRIME source material! They’re not all digital toys people! If you believe they are art then say it deserves to be adapted like it IS ART!
I think this video is weird because the behavior you're talking about is specific to not video games, I'm not sure why it is inherent to video games and more to fandom culture. It isn't inherent to video games when this happens whenever a DCEU movie is out. You should have called this fandoms are cursed not video game movies, and include your video game movies afterwards.
Were goombas even in the Mario movie??? Also I think for me the old Mario movie would stick with memory wise more than the new Mario movie because with the new one the Penguins mislead me heavily in their role in the movie while realistic Yoshi getting stabby stabbed just hits different and is always in the back of my head lol
Oh, they were, just not very often. They were BARELY in it, in fact.
I agree to a certain extent, but the truth is that I prefer the previous state of video game movies. I prefer street fighter or the old mario bros, and not in an elitist sense ("secretly they are great gems of cinema" or some such nonsense). I just think these are movies that took certain risks, and failed. The current situation seems to be playing it safe, repeating it thousands of times. Maybe that's why (and my complete emotional detachment from brands) is that I find them bland, indisputably "correct". Films that do nothing but exist: they are correctly written, correctly filmed... but they leave me absolutely nothing, neither during nor after.
I don't know what's the point of being risk-taking movies if they do it abysmally poorly. I prefer a good safe movie that is fun and entertaining from start to finish, to one that is not faithful to the source material and pretends to be more than what it really is and failing miserably in the attempt.
@@scottchaison1001 for me safe movies are rarely "fun and entertaining", but I'm glad that the current film offer is to your liking :)
i absolutely hold a certain sense of appreciation for the LSD-induced chimera that was the 1994 Mario Bros movie.
I don't see how the old Street Fighter did anything "risky" tho?
I don't know if I would call any of those movies risky. How they turned out was partially because the people behind them were trying to appeal towards a broader audience.
Hahahaha THIS IS EXACTLY IT DUUDEE oh my god here's me fanboying in the build up to you saying "they're fine."
The fast pacing is for the cocomelon brain rotted kids of today. They can't watch a scene for 20 seconds and connect it to a scene that happened a half hour ago..it just has to be flashy and distracting and move quickly or kids won't watch 🥴
go watch the kids movies from your childhood. they were fast paced too. it's just how kid's movies are. most Disney movies are like 70 minutes and everything happens so fast
"GOOD MORNING CHILDREN" 💀💀💀
Something you should keep in mind when looking ar people's reactions to these films is the stories found in their respective source materials. With pokemon there's a 50/50 chance a story will be memorable or underwhelming, outside of a sub series mario stories are lacking in depth by desing, and when the first sonic movie came out the stories for the games weren't being well received even by long time fans.
So when asking the question of why certain fans can be so defensive of these films, the answer you should consider is that the quality of writting found in said movies are exactly what several fans expected and wanted.
Sonic is alright in my house and Mortal Kombat 95 and Resident Evil (sometimes)
Only these movies though, all the others are dumpster fires
Is this the reason what's wrong with Hollywood?
8:35 agree
What was that song near the end before the credits?
I love movies but video games supposed to be interactive and let you tell the story
Thank you!, We've gone from video game movies being abysmal to aggressively mid. Wreck-It-Ralph from like 11 years ago, keeps aging better over time.
Nah, they're good, not mid, don't exaggerate.
@@scottchaison1001 Sonic Movie 2 was almost good, but I still have multiple issues with it, that hold the movie back
@@maxwasson2000 I think you're exaggerating.
@@scottchaison1001cope he has a different opinion lil bro
@@Spider-Man_234 Cope I have a different opinion than him lil bro.
So ummmm what about Wreck It Ralph. Technically it is a video game movie
So my issue with these movies. Btw ive only actually seen the detective pikachu one so ill start there. I dont like the idea of people calling this the first pokemon movie. Its not. Pokemon has an anime thats almost as old as the games themselves and is still running. The anime has some incredible movies to go with it too. Detective pikachu is a decent movie about the shittiest spinoff game in the series. And this is coming from a fan of the property. I still buy and enjoy every mainline game. I own many of the spinoffs and love em. I also collect the cards and watched the anime as a kid. And remember seeing the first movie in theatres and crying. Pokemon as a whole means a lot to me and has been a huge part of my life. The detective pikachu movie was ok. It was funny and the pokemon themselves i think looked phenomenal. The story was ok. And thats fine.
As for mario and sonic. Ive heard good things. Im not a fan of sonic. I grew up in a nintendo home. So im more familiar with mario. But neither game is really rich in lore or story. So i do find it silly to expect masterpieces out of these movies. They are silly blockbusters for children to like at in awe. I hope someday some good directors can take some more story heavy games and make some incredible movies out of them like i know can be posible with the right material. There are so many games out there that are essentially playable movies already. Those are the ones that need this. Not sonic and mario.
Ok, I get your point, but using Arlo's video was a bad example. People weren't mad at his opinion, they were upset because the video was poorly made. He nitpicked, he went on tagents, he contradicted himself, and he complained about the dumbest things. I think a better example to prove your point would be with LS Mark's video on it
All three of these movies are like eating a lot of candy. Very fun but with little substance and generally homogeneous.
I don't see the problem with that.
I dont thats true for Sonic tbh, theres substance. At least more than the Mario movie
Seems very negative. Film criticism should never be negative..?
Seeing as the Pokémon games are dogshit. Detective Pikachu is too good of an adaptation.
Recent Pokémon games are dogs***
@@scottchaison1001 No, all of them. No, Pokémon game except maybe, MAYBE, Legends Arceus is a good video game. Pokémon games since Red and, Green have been low effort, low skill, glitch fest that only get to continue gasping for air because, nostalgia and, nostalgia alone, to a low effort anime staring Ash and, Pikachu.
@@CosmicRejectsVideo Wow, that's a pretty hot take!
You made such an obvious point that i disliked the video
I think people miss the idea that the criticisms about the “flaws” are missing the actual point of the movie what you want to movie to be isn’t what matters it’s whether the movie caters to the audience it’s appealing to you can dislike it but the movies isn’t bad or mid if it’s like by it’s target audience as the one who didn’t like it you either A. Weren’t the target audience B. Missed the point of what the movie is or C. Just don’t like it my opinion is if you over analyze the Mario movie that’s on you not the movie it’s Mario expecting something always puts you at fault if you can admit you found it fine because you aren’t a fan of the original you instantly do far more to help the discourse than to state it’s just “bad” with no context
If I went into your house an smashed the center of your Tv and told you to watch a movie. Then you complained that you don't understand the movie because your tv is smashed and I said well you're just not in the target audience for movies with smashed tv so you're criticisms don't matter. Would you accept that.
Subjective criticism exists on a person-to-person basis. You can make the same argument you did anytime anyone dislikes anything. So what’s the point? Why bother having the conversation? You’re fundamentally not understanding what it means to experience art on a level beyond mere consumption. You missed the entire point of the video. Also please use some punctuation.
@@SirArthurTheGreat Ok, Mr. Pretentious.
@@scottchaison1001 It's true though. It also doesn't matter.
@@SirArthurTheGreat Nah, I think you are exaggerating.
What was wrong with the Max Payne movie? I thought it was a pretty solid standalone film.
well, it was an extremely loose adaptation------- and it kinda fucking sucked regardless.
that said, i saw it on the premiere back in 2008, and not seen it since. i definitely need to rewatch it lol.
@@transsexual_computer_faerydont rewatch it its awful
sometimes awful is funny.....but m ot sure aaaaaaa @@Spider-Man_234
2:49 Nah, you're just a bitter person then.
LMFAO whatever u say kiddo
@@Spider-Man_234
Man wow you hate opinions that’s sarcasm induced so unreal. Wow I need to know Internet nerds, heated opinions.
@@bullrun2772?? what are you saying? i had a stroke trying to read that shit.
Didn't Uncharted movie beat Indiana Jones have you ever thought maybe Hollywood is cures
The mindset of some people:
Mediocrity = Total garbage 🗑️
Its one of the movies of all time
I respectfully do not agree with this video
Reeks of pretentiousness in here.
You strawmanned Rodger Ebert. But go on.
when
@@SirArthurTheGreat The entire video. Rodger Ebert layed out a clear argument, and then MeepTop re-explained what Eberts argument was NOT, and argued against the argument MeepTop created FOR Ebert.
He made a video on that a moth before this one. Also get over it Roger Ebert was wrong.
@@Spider-Man_234 No, Some loser who makes internet videos is wrong. Roger Ebert knew what he was talking about.
i get that some fans can be crazy defensive but i take far larger issue with people who ARENT fans of something dedicating effort to invade online spaces where actual fans of something want to come together to enjoy something they alone in their individual living situations find happiness in.
like bffr, who are any of us to gatekeep “enjoyment” by using subjective concepts such as “quality” or “exceptionalism” as a metric for whether fans should enjoy or blindly defend a piece of media?
on a consumer level, if something sucks it will generate insufficient fans to continue making profit. those who dont like that thing will be rewarded by seeing less like it be produced into the world.
there is a time place and space for critical reviews of something and there is a time place and space for subjective fandom worship stupidness. such is being human. to love something despite its flaws.
for some these “mid” adaptations may be personally special so they get defensive because everytime they see something pertaining to this thing its just negative and draining of all love. cinemasins is cool but cinemawins is refreshing af..
personally think det.pikachu it’s a trash adaptation that spits in the face of pokemon fans for an interesting narrative that’s lazily written
i think super mario bros (haven’t seen) is a mid adaptation, cartoon adaptations have been done and are good so it’s not breaking new ground in the “live action” sense. im waiting for a live action mario movie to further that thought. haven’t seen it yet so idk as an actual movie..
and i think sonic is a great adaptation so far. i think it’s great they seem to be telling a version of sonics actual origin that somewhat aligns with the games. i only played a few and never for the story so this all is new for me and im while critical of the movie happy it exists and want to see it continue.
all 3 can be criticized for the sake of improvement but keep the hate for entertainment to the bare minimum. its like mcu humor, just everywhere in every thing all the time..
its unfortunate that since this is a disagreement and discussion with him he wont see it and heart/reply