Holy Artillery | The M7 Priest

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 апр 2024
  • The M7 Priest Howitzer Motor Carriage, distinct from traditional tanks, merged a formidable 105mm howitzer with the Sherman tank platform, resulting in a highly mobile artillery vehicle. Serving as a versatile artillery platform on the battlefields of WWII, it played a pivotal role in America's mechanization of modern warfare, demonstrating unparalleled adaptability and firepower. Its second iteration, the M7B2, was also used successfully during the Korean War.
    1. 105mm howitzer: The M7 Priest was equipped with a powerful 105mm M2 howitzer, providing it with significant firepower on the battlefield.
    2. Mobility: Built on a modified M3 medium tank chassis, the M7 Priest was highly mobile, allowing it to maneuver across various terrains and keep pace with advancing troops.
    3. Crew Composition: The crew typically consisted of a commander, driver, gunner, loader, and assistant driver and radio operator, each with specific roles in operating the vehicle and its artillery.
    4. Versatility: The M7 Priest served multiple roles on the battlefield, including direct fire support for infantry and armored units, artillery barrage against enemy positions, and even as a mobile command post.
    5. Artillery Support: With its howitzer capable of firing high-explosive shells, smoke rounds, and even anti-tank rounds, the M7 Priest provided crucial artillery support to ground forces, suppressing enemy positions and fortifications.
    6. Adaptability: As the war progressed, the M7 Priest saw various modifications and upgrades to enhance its performance and address evolving battlefield needs, showcasing its adaptability to changing circumstances.
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 100

  • @laughingowl7896
    @laughingowl7896 3 месяца назад +28

    "If there's ever a Priest in your area, you'd best say your prayers." Nice. I'm an Infantry vet, and while we'd sometimes dust it up with the gun bunnies at the bar, I never forgot "A battery of field artillery is worth a thousand muskets." -William Tecumseh Sherman

    • @DB-yj3qc
      @DB-yj3qc 3 месяца назад +3

      In my youthful infantry days, "we" mainly kept on friendly terms with the gun bunnies... they would be running P.T. with 155 training rounds. Great to have your back in a fight.... especially when it was with D.A.T's n scouts or M.P.s. 😂

  • @johnmcguigan7218
    @johnmcguigan7218 3 месяца назад +20

    The artillery was the one branch of the Army (not counting the Army Air Force) that excelled above anything the Axis powers had. Artillery spotting and coordination was excellent, the 155mm Long Tom was unparalleled, and the advent of the proximity fuse at the end of 1944 put our artillery in a class that belonged to the future. Time and again, our ground forces were saved by timely and accurate artillery fire that the Germans couldn't hope to match.

  • @Chilly_Billy
    @Chilly_Billy 3 месяца назад +18

    Excellent video. Armor and Infantry get most of the glory and history books, but Artillery remains the God of War.

  • @doughudgens9275
    @doughudgens9275 3 месяца назад +8

    For brevity, he skipped who did the calculations on which direction and elevation to point the tubes to fire. The howitzer should never see the enemy, the forward observers do. They give a target location, and the Fire Direction Center knows where the battery is located so it can compute the data needed to get rounds on target. I suspect the battery FDC did the calculations and the battalion FDC managed who gets support. They would say infantry company X gets direct support from artillery battery Y. This means the FO with X calls directly to Y’s FDC with targets in need of servicing. One of the US Army’s strengths in WWII was the ability to mass fires from multiple Battalions with very little effort. A division commander could decide he wanted all his artillery to support one objective with their fires. So something like 70-odd tubes of his Division artillery could fire on one target with a few radio calls (assuming all are within range). If Corps Artillery assets were used, you could almost double that number. The mobility of the Priest is what allowed this massing of fires.

  • @gsr4535
    @gsr4535 3 месяца назад +7

    Artillery's importance is often overlooked. 👍

  • @KA-dx2kz
    @KA-dx2kz 3 месяца назад +10

    The Americans had a priest while the British grabbed a bishop

  • @pauld6967
    @pauld6967 3 месяца назад +7

    You absolutely nailed the motif. 😎
    I have long thought the M7 didn't get the attention and love it deserves. Thank you for covering it.

    • @DougthebearRichards
      @DougthebearRichards 3 месяца назад

      Lot of vehicle for a 105mm weapon, and wasn't particularly good in direct fire against point targets, and didn't have a radio.
      The M3/M5 light tanks should have been adaptable for the 105mm howitzer role, as the Germans did with the Wespe.

    • @pauld6967
      @pauld6967 3 месяца назад

      @@DougthebearRichards Not having an integral radio would be a drawback if it operated independently but that is not how they were employed doctrinally.
      Other vehicles received and passed along targeting information to them.
      As for direct fire, well that isn't their intended role. Howitzers and mortars are designed to do indirect, arcing fire.

  • @rhietpas
    @rhietpas 3 месяца назад +9

    Loved the dry sense of humor. Great work

  • @elijahschwindt7403
    @elijahschwindt7403 3 месяца назад +13

    Love the various vehicles! Looks like they'd be packed in tight. Also, the 40k Rhinos made my day 😊

    • @brianwynne6835
      @brianwynne6835 3 месяца назад +2

      Lol I use half tracks in my 40k guard army as open topped chimeras

  • @itsmethelauri1183
    @itsmethelauri1183 3 месяца назад +6

    HANS GET MOVING! THE M7 VIDEO IS HERE!

  • @alankjosness2093
    @alankjosness2093 3 месяца назад +1

    My father was an early draftee because, I think, his secondary schooling in a polytechnic highschool. In early '42 he began learning the trade of artillary observation involving the M7. This was at Camp Roberts in the Mojave Desert. His unit - the 62nd Armored Field Artillary Battalion - boarded ship for North Africa in November 1942. From there the unit travelled through North Africa, Sicily, England, D Day on Omaha Beach, across France, Belgium and into Germany. The M7, (known as the Priest to one of our allies), and her crews, served with destiction throughout the Second World War.

  • @davidk7324
    @davidk7324 3 месяца назад +11

    Well done, Mr. Wilcox. Thanks to you and your team.

    • @philbosworth3789
      @philbosworth3789 3 месяца назад +1

      Hello again sir. @davidk7324

    • @davidk7324
      @davidk7324 3 месяца назад +1

      @@philbosworth3789 Hi Phil!

  • @Gundoctor913A
    @Gundoctor913A 16 дней назад

    Wilcox is fantastic at telling these stories and describing these machines! Excellent dry humor, smooth speech and obvious knowledge.

  • @Blutgang
    @Blutgang 2 месяца назад +2

    I like the use of Rhinos in your table talk. Epic choice.

    • @NMMV_USA
      @NMMV_USA  22 дня назад

      Thank your for noticing :)

  • @Kottery
    @Kottery 3 месяца назад +2

    Hmmm, those little "Priests" sure look like METAL BAWKSES

  • @kellywright540
    @kellywright540 Месяц назад

    My Dad was a scout for the 66th Armored Field Artillery Battalion in Patton's favorite Armored Division, the 4th. I used to think that he was a tanker when I was younger because that's what comes to mind when you think of Patton's Third Army. Needless to say that when I asked him what type of tank he rode around in, he said that he mainly traveled around in a jeep paired up with a tank, which for a kid in grade school sounded pretty boring. Later on I understood the part he played in the 4th Armored Division and as my uncle said, "The whole damn world was at war and there's your Dad, driving around in a jeep, looking for trouble!" He fought in the breakout of Normandy, Northern France, the Ardennes, the Rhineland with a stop at the Buchenwald concentration camps and then into Czechoslovakia at the end of the war.

  • @patrickmcintyre8023
    @patrickmcintyre8023 3 месяца назад +3

    I just found one of these at the Tennessee National Guard in Union City. I meant to get back to it to take some pictures, but that's going to wait for my next trip out there.

  • @ScottBerrier-ir3pw
    @ScottBerrier-ir3pw 3 месяца назад +3

    Look for the Book “Honor Untarnished” by GEN (R) Don Bennett. He commanded a SP Art Bn on D-Day; equipped with the M7 Priest. His chapter on D-Day is a must read for everyone. He was also one of the youngest Bn Commanders during the war. Inspiring leader for sure.

  • @MagicalMuffin12
    @MagicalMuffin12 3 месяца назад +5

    Another great video! Feels conversational and I understood what was going on, which is great since I’m not a history buff!

  • @greymatter6834
    @greymatter6834 3 месяца назад +2

    I like the buffalo cap. Good show. 07

  • @ajstephen3977
    @ajstephen3977 3 месяца назад +5

    Great video and i definitely approve of your hat.

  • @cameronhilburn5628
    @cameronhilburn5628 3 месяца назад +3

    Incredible video! Looking forward to more fantastic content from your museum

  • @kevinkelly6524
    @kevinkelly6524 3 месяца назад +3

    This was so informative and educational. Well done

  • @davidlavigne207
    @davidlavigne207 3 месяца назад +2

    Excellent descriptions of the M7 and its variants. I also appreciated the breakdown of how the batteries were organized and how they operated during both in offense and defense. The best part was the duties of the crew as described by the host. Artillery in WW2, as it was in WW1 was the largest producer of enemy casualties by far. It was the one arm that the U.S. Army got right overall.

  • @longrider42
    @longrider42 3 месяца назад +2

    Yep, we folks living in Wyoming, of which I am one. Are proud of where we live, and we want others, specially those we intend to Un-Alive, to know it :) Yep, SPG's very useful things.

  • @misterstanley6161
    @misterstanley6161 3 месяца назад +3

    Great video, super informative and easy to listen to as I was making my breakfast this morning! 😊

  • @thurin84
    @thurin84 3 месяца назад +2

    this was fascinating. never saw a video about this subject. bravo!

  • @Minirafter0002
    @Minirafter0002 3 месяца назад +2

    Where are the other 7 Hanks for reference? I need to see it fully crewed.

  • @davidholtz6590
    @davidholtz6590 3 месяца назад +3

    Thank you for a solid understand of M7s.

  • @larryselkirk426
    @larryselkirk426 3 месяца назад

    That you for that overview of the Priest.

  • @Sethoates101
    @Sethoates101 3 месяца назад +2

    Great video

  • @yannichudziak9942
    @yannichudziak9942 3 месяца назад +1

    Epic rhino’s for the win ;)

  • @akman1947
    @akman1947 3 месяца назад +1

    We need a video on that quad 50 with an/m2s that is terrifying!

  • @TheJimmyplant
    @TheJimmyplant 3 месяца назад

    Wow, the writing is exceptional. Very welld one.

  • @ryanknott7562
    @ryanknott7562 3 месяца назад

    We had one of these in our local park. I grew up playing on it.

  • @sailordude2094
    @sailordude2094 3 месяца назад

    Thanks, great channel! These were featured in the TV show, The Rat Patrol (as German tanks, lol).

  • @rgriffinRETIRED_SHEEPDOG
    @rgriffinRETIRED_SHEEPDOG 3 месяца назад

    Great video!

  • @chrispierdominici3891
    @chrispierdominici3891 3 месяца назад +1

    Great stuff, thanks for an interesting and engaging video!

    • @NMMV_USA
      @NMMV_USA  3 месяца назад +1

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @kalaharimine
    @kalaharimine 3 месяца назад

    Excellent presentation. Thank you.

  • @philbosworth3789
    @philbosworth3789 3 месяца назад

    That was a very informative episode again.

  • @Legitpenguins99
    @Legitpenguins99 3 месяца назад

    Man, I've found a gold mine with this channel. I hope and think your channel starts to blow up considering there have been a couple of popular videos

  • @matthewrussell9417
    @matthewrussell9417 3 месяца назад

    Superb!

  • @robertmorey4104
    @robertmorey4104 3 месяца назад

    Very cool, queen of battle. Artillery. Nice and detailed, well done.

    • @PavewayJDAM
      @PavewayJDAM 3 месяца назад

      Infantry Queen of Battle. Artillery is KING.

  • @Salamandra40k
    @Salamandra40k 3 месяца назад +1

    Jeez you guys need more subscribers. Amazing videos

  • @kmoecub
    @kmoecub 3 месяца назад +1

    Hold on.... Do my eyes spy Warhammer Epic 40K (now Horus Heresy) minis?!

  • @DB-yj3qc
    @DB-yj3qc 3 месяца назад

    Thanks for a informative video

  • @yoface2537
    @yoface2537 3 месяца назад +1

    Why did the Canadians make the kangaroo, that sounds like an Australian thing

  • @woodyjm61
    @woodyjm61 20 дней назад

    King of Battle

  • @lyleslaton3086
    @lyleslaton3086 3 месяца назад

    Artillery: King of Battle.

  • @thomasmitchell7645
    @thomasmitchell7645 3 месяца назад

    A very informative video! Thanks to your videos "advertising" the museum, I'll be visiting there this fall. Only one small point. Dice is the plural, die is the singular.

  • @robgleadall-cc8gn
    @robgleadall-cc8gn 3 месяца назад

    The Sexton and Kangaroo are actually based on the Canadian Ram tank... A fascinating bit of tank history in itself. Great video I have always found the M3/M4 and it's variants fascinating.

  • @mearalain3006
    @mearalain3006 3 месяца назад

    Bien joué. Greetings

  • @Thirdbase9
    @Thirdbase9 3 месяца назад

    King of Battle!

  • @darylnelson3026
    @darylnelson3026 3 месяца назад

    I believe the Canadian Army of World War 2 was the first Army to be fully mechanized .The Saxon was Canadian made , based off the Ram tank chassis that based off the M3 Lee chassis

  • @DougthebearRichards
    @DougthebearRichards 3 месяца назад

    The Birch Gun comes to mind long before the M7 Priest.

    • @nickraschke4737
      @nickraschke4737 3 месяца назад

      US war history..never let the truth get in the way of a good story.

  • @phil20_20
    @phil20_20 3 месяца назад

    In the beginning, there was the self-propelled slinger!

  • @lil_tequito
    @lil_tequito 3 месяца назад

    What were casualties like in this field? I’d imagine later in the war the rate must’ve been pretty low as they weren’t retreating all too much

  • @mtstans
    @mtstans 3 месяца назад

    Great stuff! Was that the same gun that was also used on the 105 sherman dozer?

  • @jean-francoislemieux5509
    @jean-francoislemieux5509 2 месяца назад

    they did shoot a lot in korea! how long would the barrel survive?

  • @kellywright540
    @kellywright540 Месяц назад

    I do have a question, could the gun be lowered enough to be used for direct fire for, let's say, a pillbox or a house?

  • @VintageWanderer
    @VintageWanderer 3 месяца назад

    How heavy was each complete shell?

  • @JENKEM1000
    @JENKEM1000 3 месяца назад

    Towards the end, he contrasts the US HMCs that were used for mainly indirect fire, with direct-fire assault guns such as StuG and SU-122... completely ignoring the soviet "triplex artillery" concept that the SU-122 fit into. Soviet SPGs of that era were not just assault guns, they did plenty of indirect fire missions as well, in addition to being an antitank weapon.

  • @curtisbryce5096
    @curtisbryce5096 3 месяца назад +3

    Weren't the majority of military deaths caused by artillery and mortar fire?

    • @Chilly_Billy
      @Chilly_Billy 3 месяца назад +1

      Not among submarine crews. 😉😆

    • @maxstr
      @maxstr 3 месяца назад +3

      Still is

    • @curtisbryce5096
      @curtisbryce5096 3 месяца назад +2

      @@Chilly_Billy Wasn't depth charges and the famous Hedgehog a naval form of mortars?

  • @Panzerkampfwagen_Tiger_Ausf_ll
    @Panzerkampfwagen_Tiger_Ausf_ll 3 месяца назад +1

    Question, am I aloud to enter the tanks on display without being an employee please answer

    • @NMMV_USA
      @NMMV_USA  22 дня назад +1

      Generally no. But, a few days a year we have "climb in in a tank day." Follow the FB feed to catch those announcements.

    • @Panzerkampfwagen_Tiger_Ausf_ll
      @Panzerkampfwagen_Tiger_Ausf_ll 22 дня назад

      Also if I were to join the museum/become an employee would I be able to enter it?

  • @kmoecub
    @kmoecub 3 месяца назад

    Forgive me Father, for I have sinned. Forgive them not, for they have done far worse.

  • @richardmeyeroff7397
    @richardmeyeroff7397 3 месяца назад

    I suggest that you slow your delivery it will allow the people listening to better follow what you are saying.

  • @craigmorris4083
    @craigmorris4083 3 месяца назад

    Sorry, but I believe it was logistics that won the war.

  • @chelseachelseaboy
    @chelseachelseaboy 3 месяца назад

    Sorry...did I hear you say America was the first to have mechanized artillery ....didn't the Germans have Wespe & Hummel ??

  • @stevenyouel8614
    @stevenyouel8614 3 месяца назад +2

    He makes a claim that the US was the first country in the world "to mechanized their artillery." Germans used their own self-propelled artillery in the Battle of France 1940 (Bison sig 33 using a 15 cm infantry gun on panzer 1 chassis).

    • @itsmethelauri1183
      @itsmethelauri1183 3 месяца назад

      That’s crazy, I’ve seen a lot of pictures of horses dragging German artillery through just about all parts of the war. Don’t know if I’d call that “fully mechanized” but hey, I’m not the one working at a museum.

    • @chelseachelseaboy
      @chelseachelseaboy 3 месяца назад

      Wespe & Hummel as well.

    • @davidk7324
      @davidk7324 3 месяца назад +1

      Interesting. Wikipedia indicates that just 38 of these were produced by the Nazis and they were last deployed in 1943. Horses (~2.5 million) remained widely used for transport by the Germans throughout the war, I believe.

  • @stephenbritton9297
    @stephenbritton9297 3 месяца назад

    No, logistics won the war.

  • @johnfrench1239
    @johnfrench1239 3 месяца назад +3

    Slooooooow down buddy! Good content but exhausting to listen to!

    • @videodistro
      @videodistro 3 месяца назад

      Actually it was nice not to have to run at 1.25 speed. A little more white space can be nice, but the pace didn't waste my time, either.

  • @2serveand2protect
    @2serveand2protect 3 месяца назад

    PS. GREAT STUFF! Thank You for uploading! ;) :)

  • @2serveand2protect
    @2serveand2protect 3 месяца назад

    What do you mean by "BASE" charge ?? ...as in "BASE-BLEED" or just "BASE" as "REGULAR" ?? ...and what the hell's a "25-pounder" ?? What caliber would that be??

  • @2serveand2protect
    @2serveand2protect 3 месяца назад

    Gotta give it t the Americans! ...while 70-80 % of the "pack" of the German artillery was still relying on HORSES (even by '44) - and the same went for the Soviets ... Americans had EVERYTHING (100%) MOTORIZED! The vehicle in itself might not look as something particularily "great" ...but it gives you a good idea about how much POWERFUL the "industrial muscle" of the US Army was!

  • @buttslane4491
    @buttslane4491 3 месяца назад

    When you say 'fully mechanise' its artillery, what do you mean exactly? The US Army used plenty of towed artillery, so not all was SP guns.