He got 4.71 speed...he will be burnt out in the open...he's better suited for D-Line...he's got strength to play with them hogs and speed to get around them.
@@jordanthompson621 It’s true. Height is just one component of any player’s game. Lacking in one area doesn’t automatically discount all the other areas where a player excels.
3 because he incredibly versatile. If I need someone for rushing and run stopping, I can get an outside linebacker. MLB with great coverage and speed is incredibly versatile
@@NauticaMcCarther-tv2woid say he's more of a hybrid ss/MLB. Keep him closer to line of scrimmage and help stop the run. Maybe cover the flat zone. Wouldnt pick him if I plan on running a lot of man But coach said he needs a MLB so I take #1, unless it's MLB 3/4 I might take #2
2 would be good. He's doesn't need to be the fastest. But 3 is good too because you don't need to be a big guy to make big plays. So I'd say Ian Lapeein
1 is LEAGUE one day if he stays the course-can’t teach that type of athleticism, just needs to learn to take on blocks which is an easy teach. 2 is no doubt big af and a beast, but he’s a slow beast and slow beasts can’t hang that well in todays game, this ain’t 1995. 2’s prob a 5⭐️ MLB in HS cuz of size etc but in college he’ll put that hand in the ground. 3……Baller. Just short. Still a good choice but when it’s time to play BAMA, Georgia, and heavy run teams in college buddy might suffer. 1 is HIM, just get him in that weight room and FEED HIM
@@ob_gynkenobi4014 and? Bowman wasn’t slow. 40 time is only one component of speed. This guy has a slow 40, but he’s also been evaluated as a slow player. That’s a serious deal.
I think ima take 2, me personally I like a 3-4 and having one linebacker that I can blitz is amazing and then having another linebacker that can cover, god-tier defense!
I like big middle linebackers that can hit, play the run, defend the pass and can track you down. Even though LB 2 is the biggest of the three, I personally have to go with Ian LaPieein. He might be a little short for a MLB, but a solid tackler, lock down coverage, leader, ball skills, smart AND with 4.3 speed, short or not, he’s my new MLB 1!
If you run a 3-4 you should sign 3 or 1, if it’s a 4-3 you should sign 2 so he only has to cover A & B gaps, cuz his slow ass ain’t covering no C gap lmao
LaPieein all day. He knows he's small and opposing players will probably underestimate him until they get carted off the field behind one of his tackles
I’m torn, but I might go 3, Zach Thomas was 5’11 and he’s on the verge of getting to the HoF and Sam Mills was 5’9 and he *IS* in the HoF, and they sure as hell didn’t have his speed. I think I can rock with 3
The first would be an awesome utility guy to sign, and a second would be good but I just think the third is an awesome player to have and he could make us really competitive
I’m taking 3 and here’s why, 1 you need some one good in coverage,2 sure tackling is better than hard hitting, 3 we can always develop him into a beast
Ian LaPieein 😂 bro where do you get these names from?! You got me dying here with my dad wondering wtf I’m watching 🤣 lmfao bro I hope you never stop doing these videos
2nd guy is good i like him for stuffing the run and if you work on his speed he’s a real beast, but 3 already good at all of that despite bein undersized and a guy who can cover is a nightmare i’m taking him
tbh, I'd want to sign all 3. make the 1st one my middle line backer, just have him hit the weight room. the second is FOR SURE an end/edge. the last guy can play that Isaiah Simmons role of linebacker/SS
I’m taking 3 he’s gonna be a real play maker
bros getting pancaked
3 is shorter than me by 4 inches yet he’s over 60 pounds heavier than me( I’m in the 160-170 pound range I fluticate in that range)
I’m taking 3 and converting him to an OLB
@@convey2ndacc686 London Fletcher was 5’10 n he a 4x pro bowler 2x second team all pro
I’ll jus put him at nickel
3 for sure, LBs that can cover are QBs worst nightmare
No, thats a bad decision, put him at Safety, NOT Linebacker
in the NFL maybe but in College you want a run stopper.
@@creegangil439 I think that it would be the same, at least for D1, I think they would want a hybrid LB that can do both
The weight room is the easiest thing to fix. After a year that guy probably has filled out a bit and he still has all his pros.
After a year in college he’s 223 lbs - good to go for sure
With every std known to man
Assuming he doesn't get caught up running in hoods. That was the deal breaker I saw
@@skirk248he meant running around people trying to block him not running the streets i know at first i thought he meant the streets
im signing 2 and when im done with him, he will be able to cover zones, spy qbs, and close in on the ball on top of whatever he already got
He got 4.71 speed...he will be burnt out in the open...he's better suited for D-Line...he's got strength to play with them hogs and speed to get around them.
69th like😂😂😂😂
I would just put him on the line
@@gogetit083 not when im through with him
@@wendystwo-for-five fam, you can't teach speed. You're boy will get cooked anywhere outside of D line
3, just cuz he short, doesnt make him bad. He can make sure tackles and thats all i care
3 is good, just short but still a baller
Tell me you’re short without telling me you’re short
@@jordanthompson621 It’s true. Height is just one component of any player’s game. Lacking in one area doesn’t automatically discount all the other areas where a player excels.
Move him to CB and he good
@@ThaddBoii I don’t know if your familiar with Zakoby McClain he played at Auburn he was built like 3, look at his tape dude was a straight baller
I'm taking 2, but 3 is also a respectable pick
Bad speed is a killer
2 doesn't have much speed and that can be an issue
speed is the most trainable athletic skill other than strength. you can't train someone to be taller tho
@@jayharv285 train speed tho
@@absidyabsidy2727 he will get faster
3 because he incredibly versatile. If I need someone for rushing and run stopping, I can get an outside linebacker. MLB with great coverage and speed is incredibly versatile
Ivan Pace Jr is a good example. Easily one of the best linebackers when he was in college but he is like 5,6-8
As a Ravens fan this is exactly why I fuck with Roquan Smith.
Personally I’m taking Ian LaPieein he doesn’t need to be tall to be a linebackers dudes definitely the best here 💯
No hes more of a Safety, Linebackers do have to be big
@@IceEdits_realhow he is a safety bro is 232 🌚
@@NauticaMcCarther-tv2woid say he's more of a hybrid ss/MLB. Keep him closer to line of scrimmage and help stop the run. Maybe cover the flat zone. Wouldnt pick him if I plan on running a lot of man
But coach said he needs a MLB so I take #1, unless it's MLB 3/4 I might take #2
2 would be good. He's doesn't need to be the fastest. But 3 is good too because you don't need to be a big guy to make big plays. So I'd say Ian Lapeein
The 6'2 guy is your LB/SS, The 6'4 guy is a DE (PERIOD), The 5'11 dude is your CB
232 is way to big for a corner
@@kvngty0421 I would have him lose about 15 pounds. He runs a 4.3
@@chiefkitchiwaya6551 that's still big for a 5'11 corner u could just put him at strong safety
@@kvngty0421 Facts.
5’11 should be a safety, not a cb.
1 is LEAGUE one day if he stays the course-can’t teach that type of athleticism, just needs to learn to take on blocks which is an easy teach.
2 is no doubt big af and a beast, but he’s a slow beast and slow beasts can’t hang that well in todays game, this ain’t 1995. 2’s prob a 5⭐️ MLB in HS cuz of size etc but in college he’ll put that hand in the ground.
3……Baller. Just short. Still a good choice but when it’s time to play BAMA, Georgia, and heavy run teams in college buddy might suffer.
1 is HIM, just get him in that weight room and FEED HIM
2. He can be polished to become the best there and has the physique which in a physical position is extremely helpful.
Get him a speed trainer
Moving 1 to fs since he scared of blocks and he had hood ball skills and 3 gonna be my devin bush type mlb
Agreed
The first one Ty'Quell. He's got that closing speed, we'll get him into the weight room to build muscle to help with blocks. He's easily the best.
exactly idk why these other people picking the 2nd guy when he is a kick returner as a linebacker?
He's great if you're gonna run a lot of Tampa style cover 2
3 I know it’s important to be tall and have long arms but at the end of the day he has everything going for him
#3 is literally our Rookie LB NaKobe Dean 💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅
I'm taking #3. I'd try to find a way to get #1 as well.
Honestly 2 if he’s a run stopper that all I need
Anything outside the 3 gap he missing
@@ThaddBoii NaVorro Bowman ran a 4.77. Led the league in tackles in 2015.
@@ob_gynkenobi4014 and? Bowman wasn’t slow. 40 time is only one component of speed. This guy has a slow 40, but he’s also been evaluated as a slow player. That’s a serious deal.
Number 2, Colorado backers got me focused on getting off blocks and filling gaps. 😂😂
I think ima take 2, me personally I like a 3-4 and having one linebacker that I can blitz is amazing and then having another linebacker that can cover, god-tier defense!
I like big middle linebackers that can hit, play the run, defend the pass and can track you down. Even though LB 2 is the biggest of the three, I personally have to go with Ian LaPieein. He might be a little short for a MLB, but a solid tackler, lock down coverage, leader, ball skills, smart AND with 4.3 speed, short or not, he’s my new MLB 1!
Middle linebacker doesn’t need to be too fast. I’ll take the brock. Then I’ll get fast OLB to cover sideline to sideline.
Dawg these names always got me geeked🤣
3 I love a small linebacker because they are like me a big pain when they blitz
If I run a 3-4 I’m signing 2
If I run a 4-3 I’m signing 3
If you run a 3-4 you should sign 3 or 1, if it’s a 4-3 you should sign 2 so he only has to cover A & B gaps, cuz his slow ass ain’t covering no C gap lmao
It don’t matter if I’m running a 3-4 or 4-3 im putting Brock in cause linebackers need to be big and run first
2nd one. His problems can be easily fixed
3 and moving him to a hybrid safety.
These names my boy comes up with hilarious 😆😆😆
1 and 3 one of them can play the star position probably 1 because of his athleticism
Ian pieneeen, that tiny quick gaurd that can cut through and stack up sacks is OP
I think imma take 2.. bro got that dawg in him.
LaPieein all day. He knows he's small and opposing players will probably underestimate him until they get carted off the field behind one of his tackles
i’m taking 3 for sure and turning 1 into a strong safety
3, he seems like he would do whatever it takes
2 for sure I like old school linecakers
Give me 3 reminds me of a mini Micah Parsons just need him to hit the weight room a bit more
I’m takin last dude, he has the proper weight, and he’s strong and fast, I would put the second at DE and the first one at either OLB or safety
3 seems like a solid pick but you redshirt 1 and put him in the weight room dude could be damn good
2 or 3 are the best but I'm picking 2
Taking 2 and converting him to 5 technique and inviting 3 and 1 to walk on
the 5'11one
3 for sure, short isn't a disadvantage when that'syour only flaw.
The last one is a two-way play strong safty and linebacker
the 2nd for sure
Brock “Raw dog only” 😂😂
I’m torn, but I might go 3, Zach Thomas was 5’11 and he’s on the verge of getting to the HoF and Sam Mills was 5’9 and he *IS* in the HoF, and they sure as hell didn’t have his speed. I think I can rock with 3
The first would be an awesome utility guy to sign, and a second would be good but I just think the third is an awesome player to have and he could make us really competitive
Gimme 1. He got time to get stronger and get better
Number 2 for giggles
#3 “ sure tackler “ , “ pass coverage “ and that 4.3 40 can make up for any mistakes
3, even though he's short he could still be very effective on the field. The others have some cons that will set them back
Gimme kid man dude he sounds like he has heart
I'm taking 2, but I might talk to 3 about playing safety for me.
Last one is a definition of me an I play linebacker
3 easy
2 would be my second pick
1 would still be good when we get him in the weight room
I’d sign 2 and 3 move 3 to safety or outside
Last one is basically Bobby Wagner…and if you pass him up….you tweakin
Me:ok we’re cutting all of our line backers and having you guys
3 because even though he is small, he has the skill and athleticism to make up for that, I think he could be a Darius Lenard type guy
Bro the last names 😂😂
I’m signing 2 and 1 and putting 1 at outside linebacker cuz he’d perfect for that
I’m taking 3 and here’s why, 1 you need some one good in coverage,2 sure tackling is better than hard hitting, 3 we can always develop him into a beast
yeah im taking one and putting him on a bulk he’s gonna be a monster
2, because the others are a little lite for the long haul.
The short one 😂
3 and it really ain’t too close. Can read the qb, can shed the blocks and has the speed to get in the backfield.
3 he has great potential ands looks like he really enjoys the game of football
Last one for sure. Maybe not an NFL guy, but that's a college star
Closing speed makes It hard To pick no 2 but his power down The middle is a valuable asset , It was close between him And no 3 so ….
2 would be the impulse, but I’d go with 3.
The last one reminds me of Denzel Perryman
Last guy is basically TJ Watt
I'm taking 3
I like all 3 options but but I’d gotta go with 2
Ian LaPieein 😂 bro where do you get these names from?! You got me dying here with my dad wondering wtf I’m watching 🤣 lmfao bro I hope you never stop doing these videos
I would sign the first one because just because you can’t lift doesn’t mean your not good on the field and don’t put in work
Here's the thing, to make the right decision we need to know the linebackers we alr have
3. I wanna take 2, but 3 is so versatile
2nd guy is good i like him for stuffing the run and if you work on his speed he’s a real beast, but 3 already good at all of that despite bein undersized and a guy who can cover is a nightmare i’m taking him
taking 1. good size, and has good ball skills and is speedy.
3 and 2 very hard to choose from but number 2
3 is the perfect lb for any scheme 5’11 232 is perfect.
3 but 1 is very versatile and 2 got that dawg in him he could be a DT
3 are the exact things they said about Chris Borland and he balled out in his only year in the league
Either 1 or 3 and redshirting them. That extra year should solve both their problems.
Ian is the next Zach Thomas NO CAP
I like Ian even though he is short he can get there fast
Ian for sure, making plays is more important that strength. Getting to the ball and making tackles is most important, not a bench press.
Lapeenis seems like the safest optuon
Ian Lapieein with that 4.38 speed bruh
I’m taking #3 but #2 is also a beast
4.38 forty time at middle linebacker is crazy. Shit I’m taking the last one
I'm taking 3. A LB than can play coverage and despite the size, is willing to make tackles that stop people... I like it
3 would make a fire Strong Safety
2 because it reminds me of Ray Lewis
Woah, 4.71lb dash? That's heavy
I’m taking 2 because he’s issues are fixable but 3 is a very respectable pick
The last one
Honestly would like to have all of them in my LB room. But I’m taking 3 if I only get one.
tbh, I'd want to sign all 3. make the 1st one my middle line backer, just have him hit the weight room. the second is FOR SURE an end/edge. the last guy can play that Isaiah Simmons role of linebacker/SS