This 174 Year Old Crochet Pattern Whooped me!! | Just Vintage Crochet(Mystery #11 )
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июн 2023
- This 174 Year Old Crochet Pattern Whooped me!! I came, I saw...It won! LOL
#crochet #howtoocrochet #vintagecrochet #Crochetmysterypattern #mysterycrochetpattern #justvintagecrochet
** I don't take pattern requests, thanks so much for understanding! **
=========================================================
Check out my vintage crochet pattern Etsy shop here www.etsy.com/shop/NewAgainCro...
Email For Business Inquiries Only itsnotknitpatterns@gmail.com
![CENTRAL CEE - GEN Z LUV [VERTICAL VIDEO]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VIbidJm9q34/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you so much for watching! Please hit the " Like" button above if you did like the pattern and Subscribe for Tutorials like this and more! :)
You know, it's a little therapeutic to see someone besides myself, get frustrated at a pattern. 😀 No wonder the women had their sewing circles back then... They had to work together and decode the patterns. 😂
reading this pattern makes me feel like i've never crocheted before !!!
Advice from a stats person: If you have no idea how long to make the starting chain, 30 is divisible by 3, 5, and 6, giving you a decent chance to come out right. 60 is even better, though more time-consuming, as you get 4 as well.
Many people do not know that not too long ago knitting and crochet were considered one craft. As I listened to your video on the second pattern I could see the author switching terms during the instructions. While we call the stitches in a previous row the name of the stitch we made many times the author's from the past would just change every stitch top to chains, which messes with the way we read their writing. I am so impressed with your efforts, and enjoy your honesty about how difficult it is to read from books of the past. I believe the second pattern is created from the top down. Because it has the ladder to attach to a garment, then open work. I intend to make the second pattern just to see if I can. I love a good challenge.
Be easy with yourself about being confused. Remember that you are working a pattern that is 150 years old when speaking was totally different. Heck fire girl i understand english and I am confused all the time just watching the garbage on tv. Solution...i listen to audio books while i knit, crochet and quilt.
It doesn’t matter how they turned out, you made me laugh out loud at your frustration. Brilliant! I thought the second one was meant to be curved for a hair bun cover but I was wrong too. Please keep doing them. Thanks. Lin
Wasn’t 1848 the era of ‘If it doesn’t run away, sew it onto your dress’?
Please, do not think of comments as critiques, but as a "collaborative mystery to solve"... All of us trying to decipher the meaning, and someone maybe can end up with a solution for us to see that the pattern is really beautiful and totally worth it instead of pattern of hell.
Love this series ! ❤ I believe on the second pattern, the main mistake was in row 2. In the first pattern, it became clear that they used 'chain' to mean 'stitch' when referring to the row before, so you should have worked ch6, then a sc in stitch numbers 4 and 5, then repeat. That would give you the open netted look I think that was aimed for. the last two rows will just give you sort of scallops, hard to explain without a picture...
I picked up crochet 3yrs ago. My grandson asked me to stop smoking, which I did, but I needed something to do with my hands. My friend suggested ‘Crochet’. I’ve never looked back (or touched a cigarette since). I’m
I would venture to say that those old ladies guarded thier secret patterns fiercely! 😆
I figured out the pattern for the broad edging. It is very elegant ad even regal looking! You r problem began both times on the second row as a result of your counting spaces as stitches! (Each chain and each double crochet stitch from previous rows counts as 1 chain stitch in next row. Also don't make stitches around chains, but into chains ) Love your videos and I think you are so charming.
I like challenges! So I tried to do the second one. But these patterns are extra hard for me since English is not my native language. Despite the fact that US and UK have different terms for the stitches in my language we have separate names for a single crochet and a double crochet which. So a double for me is already a tripple in the US. On top these patterns are missing any information on how many stiches you need to repeat the pattern (chain must be devidable by X) and how to start and end the row to get to the first stich in the next row.
This one was a challenge. I think I would have given up way before you did. Good for you. I applaud your patience!! The instructions were so vague. I don’t see how anyone past or present could have figured it out without a photo. ❤
Lol I thought I was the only one who threw a temper tantrum when I got frustrated with a horribly written pattern 😂thank you for being you
My guess for the first #3 pattern would be to make your initial chain in multiples of 6.
I just want to say how much I admire your dedication to figuring out what these patterns are saying even when it takes you several tries and you are getting frustrated. I would have given up in frustration before you did. ❤
Hahahahaha I’m cracking up! This is a good one! Please keep them coming. My Oma (grandmother) called the stitches chain stitches so you would just count the stitches. That’s how I read it anyways lol😂I love you and your channel ❤you’re awesome
Oh Corinna, bless you! This must of been so frustrating for you especially knowing it's wrong but not knowing where to adjust it because there's no other info to go from! I love these mystery patterns! Keep them coming 💜💜💜