[Intelligence-High School Debate] Ep.14 - To be Global Citizens Instead of Instilling Nationalism
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
- Schools Should Teach their Students to be Global Citizens Instead of Instilling Nationalism / 학교는 학생들에게 국가주의 대신 세계 시민이 되도록 가르쳐야한다
This House Believes that Schools Should Teach their Students to be Global Citizens Instead of Instilling Nationalism
The United Kingdom left the European Union, the U.S. declared an "America First" foreign policy, and many European countries are becoming increasingly hostile to refugees in order to protect their countries. The battle between globalists and nationalists has become the central axis of conflict within and across many nations around the world. The idea of global citizenship is that one's identity transcends geography or political borders and that responsibilities and rights can be derived from membership in a broader class: "humanity." Nationalism vs. cosmopolitanism... what should schools teach their students in this era of globalization?
After the fierce 13 rounds of the tournament, Minjok Leadership Academy was crowned the champion of "Intelligence - High School Debate." This week, they will compete against the representative champions from Singapore, China and Japan.
Who will be crowned the winner of the 2017 Asian Cup?
지난 주 치열했던 토론 끝에 우승한 민족사관고등학교 학생들! 그리고 이번 주, 화려하게 펼쳐진 인텔리전스의 특별한 배틀 [2017 Asian Cup]을 함께 할 참가국!
[한국 vs 중국 vs 일본 vs 싱가포르]
멀리서 토론을 위해 한걸음에 달려온 강력한 참가자들에게 주어진 마지막 [인텔리전스] 토론의 주제!
"본 의회는 학교는 학생들에게 국가주의 대신 세계 시민이 되도록 가르쳐야한다고 믿는다."
국제 사회의 다양하고 복잡한 이해관계 속 중요한 화두인 미래 세대에 대한 교육! 이에 각국을 대표하는 차세대 주역들이 생각하는 글로벌 시대의 교육은 과연 어떨지?
녹화 전 화기애애한 분위기에서도 참가자들 사이의 팽팽한 긴장감이 느껴지는 가운데, 심사위원들 또한 각 국 학생들의 다양한 의견과 활약을 기대하며 자리했다.
게다가 참가자들을 더욱 긴장시킨 다양한 국적을 가진 50인의 글로벌 방청평가단까지! 그동안 볼 수 없었던 아주 특별하고 풍성한 토론 배틀의 생생한 현장!
능숙하고 여유 있는 자세로 연사를 시작하며 토론을 이끌어가는 연사자와 귀여운 모습으로 청중의 시선을 사로잡으며 열심히 노력하는 모습을 보이는 참가자들까지!
중국, 일본, 싱가폴, 한국의 청소년들! 그들이 가진 다양한 생각과 토론 스타일을 볼 수 있는 [2017 Asian Cup]! 동북아 특별전의 챔피언이 될 참가국은 과연 어느 팀이 될지?
![[Intelligence-High School Debate] Ep.3 - Incheon / Seongnam / Hana / Yang Jae _ Full Episode](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/uJ7-HHkRTsk/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Intelligence-High School Debate] Ep.3 - Incheon / Seongnam / Hana / Yang Jae _ Full Episode](/img/tr.png)
The Japanese and Chinese debaters find it difficult to argue and defend their points not because they have weak arguments but because of the language which they haven't mastered to use yet.. Good fight though!!
well why sign up in the 1st place
@@dyfrigshandy Perhaps, they wanted to see if they could communicate in English better.
jay jay They shouldn’t have signed up if they haven’t mastered the language.
@@Andioooop come on as a britt i would say the best way to learn or master english is to communicate and talk to people !! and i think there english is pretty good considering they are from a country where englsh is not used that much
@@Andioooop That's not exactly logical. If I'm disabled, it doesn't mean I shouldn't have a shot at life. Just because their English isn't as affluent doesn't mean signing up isn't worth it.
Hope that debaters from other asian countries like india, philippines, indonesia, malaysia,etc will be given a chance to join this competition
the chance exist we just cannot compete
@@werren894 true
Yeah i wanna join too
@@werren894 Sorry I think other Asian countries as mentioned have more than enough capability to compete. It's just a fact of exposure of this competition and choice of involvement. Just a kind thought.
@vital views What crap is that. Indians don't have to prove their competence, look at the global corporate leaders and you will be able to come out of your cave to see where the world is moving.
I think singapore team has a huge advantage with English as their first language..
Yeah 😂😂😂
Sarah h Completely disagrees.. English is not an issue but the way you prepare for debate. Its better to simply deliver your ideas what ever accent you have as far as its being presented calmly without chewing the words!!
Nope. It's not their first language.
@@christopherjayjunio7444 It is. Singaporean here.
Sarah h not they first language
Singaporeans people are Chines/ Malay / India
I think if Japanese students are able to speak English fluently, they would win because their information was quite good for me.
I disagree. Nationalism can’t win because we are already moving to globalization.
@@phlow9417 in dirty way of course, ppl didn't like details about the problem in this planet and human just being optimistic that globalization would cure it/solving the issues which lead to cancer, it destroys america.
Deez Nut how does globalization destroy America?
@@phlow9417 not globalization i mean global citizen, bcoz it uses the same concept, America state is a concept like global citizen so America doesn't exist in the first place just a concept and system by design, America is like the "guinea pig" of the future because the elites is not actually indigenous it is win by the war and everybody mix and culture plot like middle east back then and it destroys them, global citizen needs to be carefully discussed and addressed properly because culture plot would happen and destroying identity or being ignorant is not right, war is easy for mental revolution but it's wrong for civilized ppl, unless if u a refugee u won't understand.
Deez Nut wait so having different cultures in a state is bad? How so?
The second speaker of Singapore is freaken explosive (literally) :3
I like her confidence
shes expressive, explosive no
RUclips is My addiction agreed
Indian Genes
She can speak rapid english but not all her stand are in line with the subject while the Japanese arguments were good only he finds it hard to speak English fluently.
It's hard to believe that they are a bunch of high-school students
Agreed their debates are too easy
@@schadenfreudeegoism7485 not for everyone... There are schools with students who can't even discuss an easy topic or use all the formal words
@@schadenfreudeegoism7485 yes
the debaters from japan tells me that english doesnt really matter in making a country a great country. woa.
Well, that is not entirely false. Look at Japan, South Korea and China right now. Most of theit population don't speak english well, but they were able to rival western powerhouse in terms of economic performance.
what does the language English have to do with making a great country? this comment does not make a one bit of sense
Obviously sarcasm is not a international language. LOL
@YourМилк I totally agree
l do agree with them
The first speaker must have scored pretty well for social studies since she basically reiterated everything in the 3rd issue (Globalization) of the textbook for some of her points
lmaoooo
Then it means the textbooks are good
Exactly. its propaganda. It comes from the top -down. It is not a naturally occuring idea, although some factors leading to globalization are... not to the extent that the propaganda proposes
Just listening this for my N levels this year. Any globalisation news videos you've got??
O levels who? I only know a debate show, instead of breaking my wrist and trying to write as much as I can like my life depends on it-
the way how the japanese girl refuse, "sorry no thank you" is so cute.
37:02
And the other one 37:29
Anime 😍😍
kawaii
she was so polite with it, i refuse POIs just by waving my hand and shaking my head pls T-T
it was a luck of Singaporean students, for they got opening government in this debate since their country is a global one where many people with different cultures live there and their mother language is English. They explained their reasons well.
As an Indonesian, I also agree to be a global citizen, so people can accept others easily as they used to do. In my opinion, becoming a global citizen surely makes people not become racist more, although not all people who have a great feel of nationalism are racist.
Ikr the more global countries like Singapore and Korea got the side for global citizens and the More nationalistic countries like China and Japan got the side for nationalism. But a Singaporean's mother language is not English, but their schooling is in English and most of them are more proficient in English than their mother tongues
I love how the second korean girl at the closing government said that,(@ 42:38) although korea has anti sentiment towards japan she herself still loves them.😍 Ohh best girl in the debate
Me too
Yeah it was super sweet
But they showed china instead of Japan???
This was such a easy topic for the proposing team to win because the world is on the way to globalization. I wonder what would have happened if the winners played the opposing team.
@pegan farm "islamization" ? Do you really think that people enter Islam forcibly ? if you think so , then you know nothing about islam , i suggest you to get to know islam before talking about some world war 3 or losing identity non sense , apparently you have no answers why islam is the most fastest growing religion in the world?
@pegan farm I'm shocked by your claims . with all due respect : 1 - Islam spreads through the message of peace no one is forcing anyone to accept it 2 - I'm talking about CONVERTED people besides non initially born Muslims 3 - again , you seem through your comment holding a grudge against Islam. why ? I don't know maybe you believe and consume everything the media says . .. Seriously what's there hurtful searching up info about Islam ? Read all the religious books then compare them . then you get why people convert to Islam .
@@ktp0294 I absolutely respect your opinion . in fact it's rightfully justified but those people you're talking about aren't Muslims . Islam prohibits any act of violence or aggression towards innocent peaceful people . Yes violence is authorized in some cases like defending own homes or even responding if necessary in case of any exterior aggression. Hence those people you're are bringing into this discussion are not civilized and 100% defying the teachings of Islam. Even true Muslims are stating this , it's unseen to the majority of the globe because the media is politically biased and spreads misinformation at any given moment . But over all the majority of Muslims don't blow themselves like it's some kind of good doing.
pegan farm I don’t agree with you, but those are some good arguments if you were to play a part in this debate
No. It is the opposite.
I love how even though some students are not fluent in English they are giving it their best I wish I had such opportunities while growing up 😢
same since I was a child I like debating even if it is just a class activity :( I hope I would have a chance in the future
in conclusion, the host is pretty af
Wowy 😃
Ya whts her name?
Pretty, but a generic plastic surgery looking face
she looks like Naeun from Apink
@@mrnarason nahh...if she did plastic surgery...she would have done her nose....
Chinese boy is so amazed with the first speaker of Korea 😂😂
Singapore and Korea team were impressive to me. It doesnt mean I choose Korea because I am Korean. They organized and prepared what they have an opinion of the topic well. Language might be hard for the others. I think they are also able to do that same way as those students I mentioned if they use their own language. The most important thing that we should know is they are young but they can speak out about the global issues using another language! We better clap for them, not judging.
Agree
👍
I refuse to clap to someone who is an ideologically possessed demon spouting one-sided political doctrine which I disagree for several reasons like incomprehensible speech due to multiple strings of contradiction and manipulation which can result to subtle mentality corruption because of weak/pathetic political perception towards the unpredictable world of deception (especially from the Singaporean kids whos country is basically an economic puppet among commonwealth states of the British empire to get access to Asian countries' geopolitical events.)
Singapore is truly a global country, we can't disagree on that. We welcome different types of people here. Hence, im proud Singaporean
you welcome different type of people who are DESERVING, immigrants moving in forcefully is a different problem
even Singapore does not allow that, and this is the main problem USA and European countries are facing.
there is a big difference.
imagine them coming in, not following the law and crying humanity when forced to follow the rules people already following.
globalist country sure u are, but doesn't mean that it is right.
and plus, singapore only accept rich immigrants. i doubt singapore will accept poor malaysians in for example.
LOL, Singapore have one of the most strict Law in the world, Singapore is just a city/state, much easier to monitor people,
it's a city state
You get 42 of 50 lights.
Punctuation who?
This debate is so educational,interesting,informative. I just hope children can learn from this.This what you call intelligence.
This is not a debate this is actually how good you are in English as a Language and how fluently you can speak it , which will ultimately think other people to give you points.
Singapore was impressive ...
@@meowmeowyoongi8403 I liked the points they considered in favour of globalisation ...I also liked the points South Korean team considered ... It was rational n balanced ... I respect hardwork of every participant ... Its not about language its about content... Overall a great effort ...
homo sapien33 they knew what they were talking bcs they speak english. You can see others wanted to speak a lot too but they were struggling in explaining what they actually wanted to share/say. Actually, language is important ofc. Singapore can speak whats in their mind clearly, ofc bcs they are fluent in english:)
Very good topic. I hope someday to live in a world without borders.
I hope that they'll invite Filipino debaters as well. I am a debater and I'm a Filipino 😊🇵🇭 Hahahaha 😂
hahahahahaa Filipino here..sana may internatiol gay debate rin😂
Yeah... Sana nga mag invite sila ng pinoy😊 para naman mas maging interesting pa ang usapan haha😅
@@fem_mia9385 Gay Debate talaga? 😂
@@luciolys5523 Para 'di maging light yung atmosphere sa venue nila. Filipinos can intensify debates.
@Delfin Sapalit But sometimes, hazards give some development. Lols! 😂
I'm wondering what would this debate become if ever Filipinos are one of the participants.
Jay Jay yeah same
It will be.
Yassss
IMONG MAMA GOVERNMENT
You’d be surprised, Filipino debaters are very articulate
Singapore team is dang good as expected(firstly their official language is English and Singapore is a big cosmopolitan/multicultural nation so globalisation is a pretty big and important topic there)
Korea team is well done as well I’m not familiar with their education system but they know what they are talking about👍
I was struggling to understand Japanese and Chinese debaters
english is not their first language
Soo true....
I didn't struggle with Chinese members though I'm a Japanese 😂
They speak pretty clearly to me 😊 I don't have trouble with accents 😊
ikrr same , I was hoping for subtitles because their ideas seemed really interesting. I think this show would have been even better if the students could speak in their mother tongue and translators could translate for them because it is a bit unfair because they couldn't present all their ideas in the short time.
The topic was so advantageous to the opening govt than the oposition. The opposition had good points but their accents were very heavy. I enjoyed it👍💫
The Prime minister and Deputy prime minister really knew how to put forth their argument! Very well done!!
Do you think its coincidence that Japanese and Chinese teams got to defend Nationalism vs Globalization and they both don’t speak English as well as their opponents? :D
the closing government speech blurts all the point of the globalization perfectly
Opposition ( china and Japan) had valid real world points,IT WAS BLOODY LANGUAGE THAT WAS THE PROBLEM,
Singaporean one was very utopian approach tho no hate.
Kudos to the young minds from🇮🇳
Both government benches did a fantastic job. I wish I was this eloquent in high school. Bravo!
However, to be fair, this was a difficult motion to oppose. One argument I can think of is this: Using education as a tool to promote the concept of global citizenship over a nationalist mindset will mean restructuring the education syllabus and potentially removing access to certain parts of our culture.
Taking language as an example, promoting a globalist mindset would mean that more widely-spoken languages in the world take priority over our mother tongue. For instance, if you're a Thai citizen, you might have to learn English, Mandarin, Hindi, AND Spanish in school. Although beneficial in an international context, this realistically means that less attention and emphasis will likely be given to the Thai language.
Taking history as an example, promoting a globalist mindset would mean that if our history textbook remains at the same number of pages, a majority of those pages will educate students on international history. It will teach us the biggest and deadliest wars, the most influential dictators, the most prominent treaties and agreements. It sounds fantastic, but if everyone (regardless of nationality) only knows about the 'important' parts of history, who will remember the 'smaller' parts of history?
This isn't to say that those knowledge are mutually exclusive. However, everything comes at a cost. Including new parts into a syllabus means replacing existing parts.
Ideally, we would love to learn as much about the world as possible. Realistically, however, one cannot expect students to take on 20 subjects if they had previously been only taking 10.
I feel debates should have translator earpiece that every person could wear. So that the debater can speak in their native language. They do this in the united nation, when they allow different countries to speak. This way it is more authentic and easy for them to debate.
The Singaporean group had so many points for their argument, deserving more points than they got. This competition seems bias and selective.
how a debate works is you're given a motion and a side, opposition and proposition. a motion can be presented one-sided or neutral statement - that's how it is. however, for any motion there will always be two sides e.g. agree/disagree for a one-sided statement, both sides will have limitations and different perspectives. whether you're able to deliver enough points and/or examples is dependent on your skill, general or relevant knowledge and mentality (confident, anxious etc) during the debate. there's nothing unfair about it.
🙌🏾This platform is so inspiring. I loved this
The quote "When all think alike, then no one is thinking" is not from Einstein but from Walter Lippman. Einstein must be rolling in his grave right now from all the erroneous quotes credited to his name.
Lollllllllllll
If it’s really a intelligent school debate, then english should ignored (since content is more important for solving these problems, think again many wars started because content lost in translation).
Thank you for sharing your experience.
Love from Nepal 🇳🇵
Basically the topic is very much in favor of the opening teams period....
Can't get what the Chinese speak at first.
Listen to the Japanese.
Wow, the Chinese team's English skill is so good.
I think the motion was one sided. My sympathy to the opposition trying to put up their case.
Why I am thinking the moderator's voice and accent sounds like Rose 😭 I realised she looks like Rose as well :"))
she has an aussie (australian) accent
Why arent channels like this on an actual tv channel. Like cbbc or something? Much more entertaining than the other rubbish
Seriously. I've been binge watching these. I love seeing students debating over world problems. Makes me believe that we can change the world our older generations messed up :)
Tbh, opposition team is already in a huge disadvantage, since their argument (despite all the reasoning) is not so valid in the modern world we now live in.
And their poor command of English puts them in an even more disadvantaged position.
I don’t know a lot about debating. I believe it’s about you making points and justify them in various ways to persuade the audience.
But without basic command of a language, it is very hard to make your speech clear and easy to for the audience to comprehend in the first place.
Also, not to mention that debates are very responsive and have time constraint.
Education is Etiquette and it helps People to bypass the rules of basic sociological functioning to produce better and better states of being
impressive speech by cristina thomas and korea team.
Nationalism is more to do with psychology and culture. It's a feeling and faith of belonging.
Chinese and japanese had a point.
Good argument
I wonder what these kids do after 10-15 years down the line
honestly, if everybody got rid of the "we think", or "the house thinks" the arguments would sound so much more assertive
Absent of Indian students make me little disappointment
nobody cares
@@mehbubulalam7889 shut your mouth on every comment you no life rascal
@@mehbubulalam7889 Likewise
@@shakedash367 shut up u insolent deuce
no one want to see Indians over there besides Indians.
I think it's so hard to get a fair assessment in terms of audience agreement here because I feel like the majority of people nowadays have a globally-oriented mindset and everyone brings their own implicit biases with them even when they try not to. That's not to take away from team Korea or team Singapore, but I think it was much harder to argue a pro-nationalist opposition and have the audience agree with you, language barrier aside.
Great debate . I watch the same video more than 3times a day😄
Everybody's talking about the Singaporeans, but don't forget the Korean girls, English is not their native language and they nailed it. I don't know how is the process of participation of the schools on the show, but if their English pronunciation is not clear, they shouldn't participate, unfortunately. The opposition might had really good arguments, but was really hard to understand what they said (again, unfortunately).
nationalism can win easily if they keep asking gov what is mechanism of implementation to avoid certain country from losing their national identity if school teach globalism instead of nationalism. Moreover, about solving world problems, if individual understand well enough how global trade works people will against terrorism, understand well enough abt climate change people will donate to combat climate change. and if people have strong love to their country, refuges issue will not exist at the first place. Nationalism is more important to be taught at school, so that students will contribute to their country and solve local issues, (pollution, poverty, harmony and political stability). If each citizen take care of their country, global problems will not exist. Ohh yaa abt skin color, is a job of that country to tell their citizen that citizenship is not based on skin color.
-love from Malaysia
"if citizen take care of their country, global problem wouldn't exist"
Well, wait until USA and Russia make a move!
I think it easier to give an argument at the government side because the inexorical advance that we called as civilization is moving slightly fast, globalisation is affecting significant role, the world apparently become more connected so people understand each other better, because of social media and internet people could see the other side of a world easily, government could give a command and make a move just by foreshadowing the circumstances from screen, conscious or unconscious we are doing everything indeed pretty close to remotely, globalisation is important sincerely the digital currency such as crypto currency is more easier to convert (and more fair) If the world has only one currency (I know there is a lot of counter argument about 'only one currency'), and apparently we can dispersed misunderstood if we understand what every person said(the solution would be: every people understand one global language, and in order to reach that point we must teach globalisation in school). I'm not telling you to abandon your local language but because of globalisation its very important to learn global language that majority of people conceive! And who knows probably in the future there is gonna be one country, erased the border across the land; and form only one country at this terrestrial, and that country name is earth
@@muhammadridho7680 " its very important to learn global language that majority of people conceive! "
so what sort of global language do you imply? also, what kind of majority of people do conceive this? how can we define if someone is considered as either majority or minority?
I think there should be the chance to debate in the language they are comfortable in.
People join this debate to improve their English
Singaporeans have the upper hand 🤣 we have this subject in our exams and debates since our whole lives. I bet they've done both the posing and aposing teams many times.
M
Yes i agree, hence why they were able to elaborate well and provide examples, but i think koreans proposed better speeches and they were able to point the main idea/problem of the motion and its urgency.
My personal, Singapore team is the best 👏👏👏
Only because of their impeccable English, I suppose
Lewl why m I watching this when I don't even understand a thing from the start itself😂😂
Don't worry, this childish debate is a joke anyway.
Thanks for posting this, what a great debate! The summaries were very helpful.
The second korean girl was too good. I understandood everything she said so calmly,clearly to the point without shouting rapping or yelling fancy words
I personally think the entire debate was somewhat a big disadvantage against the opposition considering that they're not really fluent in speaking English. If you let a fluent English speaker debate against a non-English speaker, for sure most people would probably prefer the English speaker because obviously English is the universal language, and. Maybe if the opposition party had more fluent speakers, people would understand their position very well.
the debaters from japan show me that English doesnt really matter in making a great country. whoa.
Good governance, hardwork, education. That's the key I think. Mastering English doesn't guarantee you to be better. That's just a comdition.
because there is no common language only some African country speaks french. Japan don't need English, as everyone speaks Japanese more than English.
KK
Don't need the post the same comment twice
Dumbass
@@gunchimisakhdono7632 Do some research on how many countries in Africa have English as a national language actually, and it doesn't correlate that one language could make a country great
Hate the government interruption of opposition in annoying way not like others
Well umm if somehow agree with points of China and Japan, their points were quite good..but here if as Indian i have to put some points on debate supporting why seeing ourselves as global citizen should be 2nd priority i would have proposed these points---
1. First as it was said by the speakers of for the motion that seeing ourselves as a global citizen led as well increase humanitarian feeling, what I believe is true but teaching and influencing school students bout being a global citizen is another aspect, sense of national citizen is more important because when individuals see themselves connected with their country and people and country problem it's gives another boost to youth, and being pratical being acceptable and welcoming to everyone what gives us, taking example of india what being welcoming to others gives us -*colonization* or being humanitarian in 1950 and 1955 towards China gives us what being not part of unsc and other important organization. Well what here I'm telling is not meant raising bout some political issues bw countries but it's bout being pratical what being so much acceptable gives us..
And now jumping to the point that education should not be bout wheather being a global citizen or a national citizen, education teach us being humble so that we can accept everyone , and bout being understanding ourselves as global citizen will come with that,but a sense of nationalism is must .
When we see people being bullied in different country and their inhumantarian act towards different race it's not cause they seek themselves as one country person and other' as intruder but it's cause of their lack of moral and humbleness,we see people around us being acceptable and unacceptable and it have no relation with taht people don't see themselves as global citizen.... Well in this 21st century where we see globalisation in its peak being global citizen is necessary but not essentially important.
And I'll end it with ques who will put water in others house when your own is on fire.?!
Being global citizen is helpful but understanding and seeing ourselves with our roots and country must. Isn't it??
This topic is interesting.. I hope they invite Filipino debaters😊😊
no offence filipinos are slow
@@farhia711 ok😪
@@farhia711 wow so telling people slow are not offensive? Bruhhh .. what if i tell you japanese people dont know how to speak english in no offense, make sense right?
Kimiko Kasai Filipino ideals is an antithesis to the typical objectivist Asian mindset. A Filipino intellectual is anything but slow, subversive yes, perhaps they are slow in your point of view because they are well aware that there are countless metaphysical facets to consider before coming to a logical conclusion about ANY subject. Many ‘intellectuals’ especially east Asians tend to hide the immoral and amoral aspects of their societies and thought processes with sophistry, we see through this and rather than playing defense and ultimately ‘losing’ in discourse initiated in bad faith, we’d rather not play at all.
I am from Cambodia. I very much like and support your debate. It’s useful to watch
I need Malaysia in this💯
Yes
Asia always best but we not united So usa and Europe used us and saying they are civilization.... ...
I am from Nepal.
exclude Middle east, islamic countries and russia.
The GURLLL Park Jin ha slayyyyyed like really i love the way she was saying and she was so amazingggg loved the she nailed it ✨
You guys said that the reason why the opposite group didn't have a big support was because they don't have english as a mother language, but I still think that's not a big factor in the debate. I sought a lot of these, and I see that people who have a good argument can change peoples mind even if there is an accent
The way someone speak and behave really affect and it can impress listeners more than contents
“Although I love you guys” so cute!!
Citizenship is a legal concept. Citizenship is granted by a government. There is no World govt so there cannot be any World citizenship. Think of the world as a neighborhood with many homes. You live in one home with your family. Similarly, the planet consists of many homes or countries. You can care about the whole neighborhood but will always be the owner of your own home where you live with your family. It's the same with your country as well.
Basically the Japanese debaters were avoiding Singaporean debaters' questions lol.However, Singaporean and Korean debaters were lucky and it was an advantage for them by representing in the opening and closing government.
Is anyone else watching Intelligence just to listen to the host’s accent. It’s so clear and nice to listen to😂
The first Singaporean girl has a very posh nerdy look and I wish I had that :(
Park jin ha from korea is soo talented and intelligent plus clever😍😍😍
The first girl's eyebrow is incridibly beautiful
I feel like It is a lil disadvantageous towards the Chinese and Japanese team because of the language.
Good fight.❤️
Some participants couldn't speak english BUT in a debate they have to make other people UNDERSTAND their debate right??? Coming in a international progamme their schools should've made them learn english because they spoke so much but I couldn't understand and i know they should've said something really good
Park Jin-ha from team Korea was the most impressive of all. To me, she actually brings the team to a wonderful win. Because the first girl from Korea was actually confusing me due to the lack of order to present the arguments. Before Park Jin-ha came, I thought that Singaporeans will win but after her debate, I was sure that Koreans will win.
There was no criticism about China in the whole debate- protectionism and nationalism were only debated from US or Brexit pov.
- That's how you know children are slave to a particular perspective while learning about broader world scenarios.
We want this in India...
Debate❌
Bashing America and Donald Trump☑️
And am I the only one who think the argument of Japanese team has a flaw? The 2nd speaker claimed that school education should provide students with their own choice for what to learn and should not force them to learn what the government or politicians want. But then, it violates their argument as well, because Japanese team was for the education of nationalism, not for individual's right, so that it is way far from the team's initial point of argument. So, at the point i heard his argument, i wondered what i was hearing. But even the judges doesn't seem to have recognized it.. how weird it is...
No. They only simply oppose the motion.... It does not mean they support the opposite motion.
Yep once you're in the opposition you can change your motion as long as it still follows that you are against the og motion.
And as a government you can just change how you define the motion to put it in your favor.
DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER IS KINDA DANGEROUS!!!!!! LOOK AT HOW SHE DEFENDED THE POI FROM THE OPP. SHE IS A STAR!!!!! THUMP UP MY GIRL
Ngl, i feel like the Singaporean and Korean teams had an unfair advantage due to the fact their speakers were much more fluent in English compared to the Chinese and Japanese students. I wonder how the debate would have turned out if the roles were switched? Nationalism is a harder topic to argue for, since nationalism is putting your country's interests first and viewing other countries with detriment which makes it a negative topic compared to global citizenship which is striving towards And with the additional fact that the Chinese and Japanese students weren't as fluent, this debate and the winners are quite clear from the start it would be the students arguing for global citizenship. Nonetheless this was a great debate and quite impressive
I believe that the nationalists missed very important points I will try to advance for them here. If we overemphasize the "global citizen" perspective we lose sight of transgressors. For example, from 1400-1930 European fathers had five sons and this led to idle men who waged war and conquered the world and this over production of sons also led to WW1 and WW2. Today Muslim nations have an even higher fertility with places such as West Bank Palestine with six sons per father. Nationalism and opposition to immigration then become important tools of defence and help the offending nations to understand what they are doing wrong. For example, the offending nations need to educate women to encourage them to have first born after the age of 23 in which case mothers go from having 12 babies to having 2 babies and the problem of terrorism, hunger, mass immigration, is solved. Also, if the USA had been more nationalistic they would have stopped Japanese, Korean and Chinese students from taking all of the know-how from American and European technical universities. On balance, and quite possibly, the west was damaged by that and sent from having Bell Labs engineers leading societies to having lawyers and MBAs who cannot do math "leading" societies that now are hungry for interesting STEM jobs and which are in massive debt. Take a country such as England with Darwin, Newton, and so many wonderful scientists: did they need foreign students or so many foreign professors to advance? If we are honest we must categorically answer that in the negative. To summarize this point, female inclusive values are one side of the story but male exclusive values are neglected by John Lennon type of beliefs in "global citizenship". Excluding people or discrimination takes place in the derivative professions of law, medicine, accountancy, management with many great people excluded based not on the absence of advanced degrees but on the absence of some "professional qualification" (Chartered Accountant diploma, etc) and prevented from practicing - it is many of these professionals who having received the benefit of the closed shop are pushing the "global citizen" ideology.
There exist other points. The "invisible hand of Adam Smith" which underpins and justifies capitalism assumes that the generated wealth and employment will be spread GEOGRAPHICALLY NEAR the source. With six billion people earning less than 2 USD per day, the recipe of globalization is to make everyone poor. Hence, the national agenda signifies caution not to destroy the local society that generates the intellectual property and that invests in the education of its citizens. Almost all inventions have come from national R&D in pursuit of nationalistic causes, e.g. WWs, Moon Landing, Cold War, etc. Without these innovations entrepreneurs would be far less successful (there exist entrepreneurs among the Indians of the Amazon jungle who are as able as Bill Gates and Steve Jobs but
who do not have technology). As with Signal Processing there is a balance to be found between locality of interpolation and globality of interpolation. We must prevent the landscape from becoming overly smooth and running rough of the important local details which are not the noise. Along these mathematical lines exists another argument. If we encourage too much fluidity of cross border operation to multinationals we easily create the scale free network, with employment and know-how nodes emerging in particular locations with most locations in the world de-industrialized. Nationalism acts as a damping force preventing the emergence of these geographical scale free clusters and protecting the employment of citizens. A final point is that not all cultures are equal but some are more honest than others. An honest culture risks the advent of corruption if it opens its borders and preaching "global citizen" is of grave danger to such countries. One must not overplay nationalism but identity is healthy to some point. Similarly, the globalists missed some points but their case is easier as it is more popular with young and idealistic people.
Nicely written, nothing to undermine about what you said on globalization. Since the origin of nations, we were brought up as nationalistic societies (do so religions, castes, traditions etc etc.,), Globalism is still primitive and needs a proper blue print (might take generations). Since, people need to raise above primitive traits which prevailed as nationalistic barrier such as religion*, identity to certain race, color, creed, caste, gender, rich and poor. Values as a human towards fellow human needs to be instilled (not just liberalism...as if fu*ck the society...i don't care traits), values towards nature and intellect needs to be imbibed. In short, in a long run globalisation is the way to prosper (but takes at-least few generations to raise above **religion, color, race and sex. This is the only way to reach spirituality, connect with the cosmic energy, become one with the nature and away from destruction. last but not the least saving the planet and overpopulation.
@@chaitanyacg1250 It was nicely written but you missed it, I believe. What he wrote was for the side of nationalists and not for globalization. 😂
Singaporean.. I'm really convinced by the way u deliver
The korean speakers truly slayed it!
That's just 4 countries 😂 ASIA IS HUGE. How can they call it the "asian championship" when most of asia isn't even there?
Exactly 😅
The arguments the proposition whip brought were really interesting and insightful
これは、日本人と中国人不利すぎ汗 英語が母国語のシンガポールと、小学生がTOEFLやるような韓国とのチームに、ガチンコ言論バトルに勝つのはきつい
as a japanese that i am , it takes little pity on japanese and chinese students, because regaldress of what they think , it is hard sruff to express their own opinion in another language.
The koreans are also speaking in their second language.Japanese and Chinese students have no excuse for that.I'm from Bangladesh,a third world country.Despite this most of us can keep up with the Koreans level of expertise in English.what are the Chinese and japanese students lacking that it's unfair to them
And this was not debate whatsoever
Face the reality kids...
Singapore was the most articulated. I'm also a globalist and I'd like her to be my prime minister. Korea debated greatly, too. The language was unfortunantely a detrimentous factor for Japan here. I think it would be better if they have the permission to speak in their native language.
From the look of things, good English doesn’t matter. Powerful arguments and good analysis matters most in all debates...
Singapore killed it. Though the chinese guy wasn’t so articulate and refuting, his partner was logical. South Korea, on the other hand, provided a more concise argument that addresses the motion. I vouch for South Korea to win. However, I feel bad for Japan (even I myself cannot understand their point because of their pronunciation). They had something but the situation put them in a disadvantage.
40:50 2nd Korea speaker is Completely wrong. It's not about black people but mexican. If this debate was held anywhere in the world except Korea, Singapore team would win without a doubt. It shows korean Nationalism. lol
Is it just me? Having hard times to understand their arguments? 😅 But I think they are all good. Kudos!
The first girl from singapore was very passionate. No matter if you agree or not with the points she makes, her speech in my opinion seems very convincing because it shows how she truly believes what she is saying. Also when sje answers to qiestions from the opposotion she doesn't do it woth amger bit woth respext of the others point of view. Well done!
In debate...I believe,how u deliver ur speech and argument with a little sarcasm will be very beneficial..also Need to sound sure even if ur not sure...Haha thats how u persuade..Confidently.