She CLAIMS To Be A MORAL Absolutist And Gets COOKED!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 июл 2024
- 🔗 Full video: • 4v4 Debate GOD Andrew ...
📅 Dating Talk is LIVE every Sunday & Tuesday 5:00 PM Pacific Time
▶️ WATCH LIVE: ruclips.net/user/whatever?sub_...
💎 Join: ruclips.net/user/whateverjoin
📺 Patreon: / whatever
👕 Merch: shop.whatever.com
💵 Tip Jar: paypal.com/donate/?hosted_butt...
🎥 Equipment: amazon.com/shop/whatever
📘 Facebook: / whatever
🐦 Twitter: / whatever
📷 Instagram: / whatever
👾 Twitch: / whatever
👽 Reddit: / whatever
🏴☠️ Brian: / bd_atlas
🌴 Linktree: linktr.ee/whatever
🎧 Listen: anchor.fm/whatever
Wearing glasses 👓 and talking fast doesn't make you smarter 😅..
Oh snapz! Lololol
She wants to be seen as the "smart" mía Khalifa
Factsssssssss
@@madjunir😂😂
They're not even real glasses, she said it on destiny's stream...
Her logic makes no sense. Doing drugs is bad, selling drugs to drug addicts is perfectly fine. Ridiculous.
This is a DAMN fine example bro 🤜🤛
👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿
She's not saying that. She's saying some people have goals that include doing drugs, and some do not, so I'm fine with selling drugs to those who want them, but I personally am not going to date a man who's buying and taking drugs.
Why do you say here logic makes no sense? There is no logic there at all.
Exactly. That's the example I went to in my head.
She used non comparative examples when she brought them up as an explanation or defense.
This is like observing a chess match between a man and a pigeon
This is the most underrated comment ever!!! 😂😂😂 I'm dying laughing at this, so true lol
Or a man and a germ
Honestly, the pigeon could probably put up a better fight😂
Imagine falling in love with a woman like this who thinks she’s way smarter than she actually is and is super closed minded and just argues because her ego can’t admit she’s ever been wrong
@@Twi244 hahaha - you just said shes someone whom one could fall in love with..what do you think she's entirely different at first and then does a mad switch? Lol idiot.
She used the intelligence she does have for evil.
Y she is nuts
So women 😂
She's obviously smarter than most of us. You might not like her perspectives or what she's saying, but that doesn't mean she's not smart.
This is just like saying: I hate drug addicts and will only be around people that don't do drugs. BUT! I am a drug dealer, and selling drugs does not contribute to the drug addict problem!
She’s not understanding this obvious point she’s an idiot, she keep saying everyone has different morals, but he’s asking her bout hers !!!!, but she keep answering everyone different
Good one
No its like saying i do drugs but i wouldn't date someone who sells it.
To go deeper:
- She says using drugs has negative consequences, such as ED, lack of intimacy, etc.
- She won't date a guy who uses drugs because of those negative consequences
- She recognizes that the negative consequences are undesirable and harmful, which is why she won't date a guy whose drug use would cause them
- She calls the avoidance of negative consequences a "preference," so that she can simultaneously say that if others are harmed by them, it's not morally bad that they were harmed
*Therefore* selling drugs to other people, knowing that those drugs will cause them (and others) harm, is not immoral because causing harm and other negative consequences are just preferences and maybe someone wants to have harm & negative consequences to them. Some people like getting high, and it doesn't get them fired, so in those cases, it's perfectly moral to use drugs.
She wants to feel like whatever she does is okay. She can ruin someone's life and call it "preference." She can hold double standards because it's "preference."
@@theevermind great breakdown! TWO thumbs up 👍🏽 👍🏽
She's not debating to explain, she's debating to win, hence all the deflections, the circular arguments, the miscontruing.
@@Malkav I think you've got the debaters switched lol
@@lieseseaver6721are you disabled?
@@lieseseaver6721 you just didn’t follow the conversation very well. He’s testing her logic and she’s doing anything to avoid questions that show her flawed argument. Once she knew she was caught she evaded as much as possible and tried to switch the topic.
She's not even debating, she's just running her mouth. She doesn't listen. She just keeps beating the dead horse of her bad points that lead nowhere.
@Tamarocker88 I was going to say that she isn't debating at all. She's just arguing, the interruptions, trying to change the topic, talking over her opponent, and not letting them finish their questions, arguments, and rebuttals. As my boss describes it, she's all up in her feelings, rational debate requires the ability to emotionally disconnect from the arguments presented.
over educated 304 spewing word salad
eloquently put, good sir
More.
I keep looking to see if she plays with her nose but maybe it’s caffeine.
'Over' is incorrect. She's an idiot.
Over educated?
Great Value Mia Khalifa is on a level of cope I've never heard.
Great Value makes some good stuff.
This is Wish or Temu.
@@theevermindwish can have decent stuff as well this is definitely just temu 💀
@@theevermindtemu asf
That girl in the red dress has been doing a LOT of unethical consumption under capitalism I'd say.
😂😂😂
That’s a gi… what the fuck
No...She's doing it under socialism...She's just taking the other peopl's share...She's pretending she is the few people that would be in charge of the socialist regime and they get whatever they want...Let them eat cake :)
sHe hAs a thYrOiD cOnDiTiOn
😂😂😂😂
Send the fucking asteroid
Generally I have been against this.. post video, SEND IT
The movie Armageddon petrified me as a child. I would legit rejoice if a big space rock found our little moist marble in my lifetime.
@@dbutler9319Jesus. U ok over there bud?
@@SmeagolsSmegma lol hell no.
It's at the table.
It's like watching a toddler fight Mike Tyson. But the toddler was really cocky and self confident.
Nah, after a punch or two the toddler would have given up (because the toddler is smart)
It's like this Mike Tyson.Jake paul fight coming up
It’s worse bc in this case the loser of the fight who actually got knocked out repeatedly still thinks she won and will change the rules over and over until she considers herself the winner
🤣🤣
It was like watching 2 todlers fight
She is putting words together that make sense but has nothing to do with anything that is being said. She got good grades in school and knows some big words. You ask her a specific question, and she rants about a totally different subject that doesn't even come close to addressing the question. She's a mimic at best. It sounds like she heard these words used before and just can't wait to sound smart and be taken seriously.
Her puthi aint worth it.
No that's not the case. So when she talking about Porn the moral and negative aspect of Porn and what not her arguments are sound and logically thought out. The problem is she making those arguments while make the claim that she a moral absolutism. Which does not match with her arguments. A moral absolutism is some one who believes there are things that are morally wrong no matter what. So Killing, stealing, Adultery are morally wrong no matter what. Were a moral Relativism is some one who believes that moral principles are not universal but are based on culture, society, and individual circumstances. She also a moral consequentialist as well. I think she just confused about all these terms. She just needs to look in to them a bit better.
The problem is that her argument about porn and the morality of it is still sound. Andrew is not define these terms clearly because he wants to keep it locked on these terms. Because if he defines it clearly and she realize she wrong and concedes the point. It still doesn't invalidate here argument about porn and what not. I don't think he knows how to counter her argument.
Exactly. Like loads of women she browsed instagram or read some feminist book and her ego noticed some phrase and obfuscates her from guilt of immoral actions so she consumed the phrase and weaponised it, never having it used back on her.
@@deaddudegamingher moral framework is like most modern women, it’s not new or complex. They follow the devil on their shoulder and at cross roads where they want to commit an immoral act, they restructure their morals where by that act is no longer wrong and they are right. So you could ask this woman “what have you done that is immoral” and she will say nothing. Her egos first line of defence is “I’m right, I’m good” not a set of morals that holds herself accountable. If she today thinks abortion is wrong but tomorrow wants to get one, she rewrites her value system to where abortion is not wrong. What Andrew does well in this forum is he exposes these women’s moral framework. Women change their morals behind the scenes and later pretend that they always had a set of standards, if their morals are made transparent and out in the open, they can’t sneakily change them behind the scenes when they later in life come to a cross road. For that reason she aggressively defends giving absolute statements on scenarios that one day may apply to herself. She’s an absolutist in theory, but verbalising her rules will hold her accountable to them and she’s a woman and just cannot do that.
@@deaddudegamingno, her clam is very hypocritical. She claims to be a moral absolutist and yet would not date a guy who involved in consuming the product that she sells.
She got so owned..The Moral Absolutist realising she is a Consequentialist
Well she wrong about the moral absolutist but her other arguments which Andrew is avoiding like the plague because he can't counter her argument are correct. Yes she more of a Moral Consequentialist and maybe even moral relativism.
@@deaddudegaming she doesn't HAVE an arguement, that's the issue here. What she has is a preference, and AW is trying to get to the bottom of her morals because SHE'S saying SHE'S a moral absolutist. He's honestly JUST TELLING HER that she doesn't know what the hell she's talking about and that her own ethics contradict her doing porn.
She's trying to say she doesn't have to feel bad about producing porn while she herself objectively believes it produces a bad outcome. The example she's using is a lesbian selling porn to men. Which is stupid and has nothing to do with her OBJECTIVE statement that what she does has negative outcomes. She's equating two different things here, and either doesn't understand what he's getting to or is deflecting.
I’m pretty sure that she has proven, without much room for doubt, that she has no morals, by her actions and statements. Shilling for whatever left wing PAC would give her quick cash regardless of the merit of the cause or candidate is pretty vile. I don’t think many people would disagree.
Whatever label it is, she's trash
@@deaddudegaming stop simping dude
imagine a meat butcher saying he only dates vegans
He has the right to, but denying it's hypocritical would be delusional
*only dates vegans because of the negative consequences of eating meat.
The fatal flaw in her bloviating was saying that porn causes harm, such as ED, and her 'preferences' are to avoid that harm for herself.
If the butcher thought dating vegans meant less harm & negative consequences for himself, but then sold & promoted meat, then he's a hypocrite. If he thinks meat is A-OK, causes no problems (and is even beneficial), but he just kind of likes the hippy-chicks and the aura--not because it's right or better (or reduces harm & negative consequences), then it's not hypocritical.
There are lots of things people can do or sell, that make little to no difference as far as harm or negative consequences. They sell those because there's a market. I can sell fashion accessories, but I'm not into fashion accessories. They are neither good nor bad, they don't cause harm or neg effects. No one suffers if they use them or don't use them. In this case, I wouldn't be a hypocrite. But the moment that I state my preference is because they cause harm, then I'm complicit in causing harm to others.
@@theevermind Very well said. She, without prompting, stated the HARMFUL SIDE EFFECTS of porn. Then she thought she could convert that into "preference." No, you f'd up. Literally right at the beginning you defined porn as harmful. On the sneak, she further stated that this harm damages overall character beyond pair bonding, but they were screaming and yelling so they missed it.
He absolutely can have preferences
Her brain is so fried.
It’s simple. She’s smart and she knows what she’s doing is unethical but she has found a way that works to tell herself and others how it’s not. But it involves a borrowed line about a belief system that she doesn’t truly believe.
So an example of this;
“I smoked today because I know the worlds going to end tomorrow…anyway, I booked my flights to Spain for next July”
So the climate change line is used as a world view lie to justify an action but later debunk by their own thought process proving they don’t believe it
@@j0fiz986she has no intelligence, only indoctrinated and brainwashed....
@j0fiz986 she so smart she made herself look dumb
She thinks she’s smarter than she actually is, and instead comes off as annoying and argumentative for the sake of it.
She backpeddled so hard at the beginning I think she may have reversed the rotation of the earth.
She interrupted so much I can’t believe she really tried to say Andrew was the one doing the interrupting. There was hardly a time where Andrew could finish a sentence without her interrupting and splurging.
Yeah and all the other dumb slots agreed with her lol
Projecting, just like every other captive of the hivemind
When you're in a hivemind (e.g., have opinions told to you), you don't have original thoughts, only those of the group. You can't imagine someone being different, because the only thoughts you have are the same as the group. Therefore, if you want to attack someone else, you can't accuse them of anything that you don't already know, which is what you already do. Therefore, when they accuse others, it's always something they are already doing.
I was listening in the truck and her nonsensical interjections got so bad that I audibly yelled "SHUT TF UP AND LET HIM FINISH!!"
@@bobby_hill8357 Seriously, I have to stop listening to the pod sometimes cause it’s just too damn frustrating with all the interruptions
She claims they dont let her speak, then interrupts him everytime he gets 6 words out lol
That girl is a walking talking brain damage. They should post up warnings on these videos because I just lost half of my brain cells listening to that
She got so defensive as soon as he caught her being a hypocrite
She says “what?” After everything he asks her because she needs more time to think of a completely moronic response
Exactly, I felt like she was buying time as well. It's not that she didn't understand what he was saying it's that she was using that time to think about her answer to his previous question. This whole exchange she was playing catch up 👍💯💯💯😂😂
Why wait when it all comes out moronic?
I don't even understand a single thing she's saying🤦
That’s because she isn’t saying anything.
@@user-fm5xt7zx4i sorry for your plight.
Well done, you passed the sanity test
Neither does she.
Neither does she😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
What kind of cognitive dissonance is this. You can't provide a service and judge people for taking part in the service you provide.
TBH, I completely agree!
Bless Andrew for engaging with idiots so the rest of us dont have to, haha!
She's more like a drug dealer who won't date a junkie, But has no problem getting people hooked on drugs.
And then she would be like, where are all the sober/non addict men at?
Andrew has patience because he knows his argument is sound. She doesn’t stop overtalking because hers isn’t
“Here’s my cute little 2 sentence answer”
Proceeds to yap😂
When a woman keeps over talking and not answering questions then you know they don't have sense or logic.
When they ask a question and start talking as soon as you begin an answer ...
I wont date someone who watches porn but it's not immoral to do onlyfans and contribute to an individuals porn addiction ... makes no sense.
Makes perfect sense. Doing porn makes her money, so MAKING porn is good. Watching porn makes men less interested in dating sl*ts, so WATCHING porn is bad. So long as it benefits HER, it is good. If it doesn't benefit HER, it is bad. See, perfectly logical.
It totally makes sense. It's the best way for her to make money. She's just not willing to Admit it.
The moral absolutism definition is the view that there are moral laws that are universal and unconditional. They are universal because they apply to everyone at all times. They are unconditional because they are not affected by circumstance, culture, or any other contextual condition. since she was clearly way fucking off.....
She is not used to people knowing the definitions of her words. She surrounds herself with OF girls and fans for a reason.
Thats a great definition. Farrah wasn't close 😂
She used so many big words and said ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! Nothing she said made any sense at all... Cringe Cringe Cringe!!
In business class, they tell you Not to do this 😂
@@zhadowbladeright!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
The dating realm is doomed😂
You're implying these women are dateable in the first place 😂
@@mortarion9787 their fuccable Issa diffence💯🤣
Well for her it is
That's why I'm single as fuck and I fucking love it
@@GwopLifeMg-vl4hm I would F them that’s it and leave lol
Listening to her my brain cells in grey mass in the brain started to fight and killing each other.
I got more stupid just by listening to her arguments
Glasses is the very definition of educated beyond her intelligence.
No, only indoctrinated and brainwashed...
Harsh, but no lies were detected.
Wow. That’s the biggest deflection I’ve ever seen in my entire life. She really knows she is a hypocrite and she won’t accept it because WOMAN DO NOT TAKE ACCOUNTABILITY!!!!
she sound like justin trudeau
@@blacklabel130 justin trudeau is the human version of tampons you find in a men's restroom.
Well, THIS woman doesn’t. Please don’t label all of us!😃
She knows damn well she’s responsible.
that's like saying a drug dealer has no moral obligation.
A better example would of been shes basically a drug dealer who sells drugs to people who have no control of themselves for her product. Her taking advantage in her eyes is morally good because she doesnt do the drug herself
That’s the exact example that I was thinking fits better and not her “perfect analogy” since her perfect analogy talks about a preference that requires no action, like I can be a Christian and I don’t have to act on it in a positive or negative manner.
These debates so disprove the delusional idea of female supremacy and intelligence on any level🤦😂😂😂
She’s morally bankrupt
Farah is insufferable
Insuffarahble*
Insult-Farrah-Able
Big Red wasn't ready LMMFAO
Big red was thinking about food the whole time
@kumulsfan8090 burger king were probably panicking as she hadn't ordered in a few hours. Single handedly holding up 4 franchises.
At least she was more coherent with her responses
@@shoopypit4884 I disagree
They’re moral relativists. I don’t know what I expected.
I mean, yeah. Women tend to be relativists. It all has to do with the consequences and who will be the one facing the consequences. If she will be facing consequences, she's the victim. If someone else is facing the consequences, she's the victim.
She's "ABSOLUTELY" insufferable.
How can you be a moral absolutist if you have no morals to begin with ?? But then want someone who has morals??? Aiyaiyaiiiii
This conversation is way out of her league. Her logic fumbled so many times and she didn't even notice
"Why is it immoral to deal fentenyl to X group if i am not of that group?"
"That man in the corner is playing Galiga. Thought we wouldn't notice." Tony Stark 😂😂😂
It's worth more playing Galaga than to listen to an idiot woman.
It's worth more playing Galaga than listen to a derailed stupid girl.
😂
She is a moral subjectivist lying to herself calling it absolute.
That's because her ego and self-absorption are so grand that she believes her personal takes on moral relativity are in fact absolute. It's why she's fighting so hard to ignore anything that is said and to die on the hill that she's "a moral absolutist" and her decision not to date men who consume Pr0n is merely a "preference" while insisting that making Pr0n herself is devoid of any moral relativity.
her argument: i like this blue shirt over a red one. his argument : isnt the blue shirt made from the blood of the innocent. Her answer: I just said i like blue why should i care
It's worse
She said: prefers men who don't wear X shirt because it causes negative effects like ED, and she doesn't want negative effects.
He said: but you sell X shirt knowing it causes those negative effects for other people.
She said: that's my preference. Maybe other people like being unwittingly harmed by my product.
Why is my head hurting.
The self-proclaimed "moral absolutist", is a textbook example of someone with just enough intelligence to get themselves in trouble, but not enough intelligence to get themselves out. Her ability to reason in logical fashion is extremely limited.
Why is the chick from my 600lb life on here?
Oh my God, this girl says 10 million words a second and none of them make any sense.She can't learn because she can't shut up long enough to listen
Huge waste of 33 minutes. She thinks she is so smart because she can not answer a question and try to turn a simple question into something its not. But no one should expect anything different. No one who does bad things admit they do bad things. A drug dealer doesnt think he does bad things, an arms dealer doesnt think he does bad things, the ceo of an alcohol company doesnt think he contributes to drunk driving fatalities. Its all the same. She is no different. She is a hypocrite but like every hypocrite she will never admit it. Look at that I ended the entire conversation in 2 minutes.
Nice try lil girl.
Warning ⚠️ get some paracetamol ready. You're about to get a headache 🤯 Horrendous.
Pretending you are educated never works.
This 304 is working hard for that gold in mental gymnastics.
She’s the one who said: she’s a moral absolutist!!!
Her: ANSWER MY QUESTION
Him: well
Her: cuts him off to yell
Did you want the answer or not?
If he answers, then she may have to concede that she's wrong. It's easier for her not to let him answer.
She keeps ducking and weaving to avoid Andrew's questions.
She litterally take up half of the right side of the lineup. They sitting extra far from her too.😂
This all boils down to accountability and Farah's aversion to it. She's an extreme coward in front of the consequences of what she does.
Her moral standing seems to be based on "All feelings are justified."
I know this clip is centered on the 304 justifying her poor life choices and coping with it but I can’t stop staring at the thing in red
Well, when Clifford takes up most of the screen, it's hard not to
That’s Postman Pat’s van.
careful, when you stare into the void, the void stares into you
I am very saddened by how many guest they can find. That are outrageously ignorant.
Exactly. Then people say it's only the guest they have on their site. HOWEVER, there is obviously an endless supply of these ignorant women that are coming in this show week after week, month after month, year after year.
Its immoral, it'd be like a AA advocate buying booze for Alcoholics
She spent this whole debate stepping on her own rakes and land mines 😂
She didn't shut up that whole time and then told them they were talking over her.
Does the intellectual even know what moral means? Please tell me that I will not have to pay for her college debt?
The student loan forgiveness got blocked. It's OK. They put themselves into debt and refused to pay, believing it would be forgiven, and that decision is going to bite them very hard.
"Intellectuals are people whose end products are intangible ideas, and they are usually judged by whether those ideas sound good to other intellectuals or resonate with the public. Whether their ideas turn out to work - whether they make life better or worse for others - is another question entirely."
- Thomas Sowell
Trying to use logic in a conversation with a woman is like trying to row a boat through a desert.
None of the women here understand that you don't have to actually say the word to be talking about the word. You don't have to say ethics or ethical or morals or morality or morally to be talking about those words lol
She sounds like the mistress that will sleep with your husband then demand he leaves his wife and be faithful to her... lol hypocrite to the core.
I don’t know chief… don’t think anyone wants to lie down with that thing unless it keeps its mouth shut LOL
the fact she was complaining about NOT being able to talk...... lol - she wouldnt stfu
Her logic says a cop can commit crime and its not hypocritical if the cop also wont date criminals.
That’s one well built chair 🪑
Give the designer a raise.
Glasses is the definition of having a education doesn't make you intelligent 😂
Solid proof as to why you should not go to college
Education is the first barrier to gaining knowledge
@user-fu6ql2yg5w Correct...but Knowledge isn't intelligence
This is why I can't take women seriously.
She doesn't understand moral absolutism and she doesn't understand what she believes.
All she cares about is justifying what she does while removing any responsibility she would have by the outcomes she's is producing while justifying her own preferences AGAINST those outcomes.
These women really just argue to argue.
"I may have misquoted the phrasing" shows she doesn't believe this for herself or even understand it. She's just regurgitating. 🤣
'Right' is not the same as personal. Realising and living that bears a huge cost and accountability. She wants to moralise without bearing the cost.
How is it not immoral to contribute to problems in society/relationships that you don't find desirable for your own relationship? It's like saying you want to earn money sleeping with married men but demanding monogamy when looking for a partner because infidelity hurts relationships. 🤯🤯
What a hypocrite creates porn but attacks people who watch it, according to her logic she is attacking her own customers
She does not comprehend the words she utilizes and instead just regurgitates a word salad in and attempt to feign intelligence.
She is putting words together to make simps perceive her intelligent, while not knowing what any of those words are.
she probably dont even need the glasses. she just a poser. posing to be so smart but speaks nonsense
She's admitted in the past that they don't have a prescription. They're just glass panels.
@@munky342 haha so predictable. Thanks
Andrew helped them expose themselves 😂
She’s a hypocrite with double standards, and she’s definitely not a moral absolutist, but I don’t understand what does morality have to do with it the entire argument. The guy arguing with her just insisted on shoving his morality argument that’s all.
Moral absolutism is not a justification for harming others; even if that harm is self directed. The person inflicting harm is exploiting another’s weakness, which is immoral prima facia.
She had a good vocabulary. That’s the best compliment I can give her. The obvious contradictions in her statements suggest she is trying to justify her immoral actions.
Andrew dog Walked these two treeshas with ease. Bravo
LOL
She knows exactly what you mean!! She’s purposely evading the question because she knows she’s WRONG.
what's the point of being a _moral absolutist_ if you don't care about consequences for immorality, and you can't even define what you believe?
Andrew's brain is great. It's like a map of endless highways that always converges back to a central point. Sometimes, I have to rewatch parts because whoever he's debating with has a scatterbrained approach, and I get distracted, but then his argument always follows back to the logos, and Aristotles 3 main laws of logic. It's fascinating to watch.
he's ridiculously intelligent it's not even fair lol
Your description is apt. The way his mind works is fascinating
He doesn't need to dunk on you ethically. You are doing a great job of that yourself.
She tried doing the “your question makes no sense” lol
anyone talks that fast is a con artist
Why is she so good at not listening
This was not a productive conversation. It's like talking to a wall