I know everyone is sick of hearing this, but Nintendo hasn't been the same since Satoru Iwata died in 2015. DK tropical Freeze 2014 Wii U, $50, later $20. DK Tropical Freeze 2018 Switch, still $60.
Satoru Iwata was a gamer first, who understood the value of a player base, what we wanted, and how to deliver on that, while also pushing the boundaries of what games could be. Shuntaro Furukawa is a businessman first, which tells you all you need to know.
Glad to see more and more people actually voicing their complaints with the game. It's sad that after many months Battle League hasn't gotten much better since this video :/
I watched through the entire video, and throughout it, I kept asking myself "They waited 15 years for.. This? Isn't this just a downgrade in every way?" And I wondered why you weren't that upset, and then I got to the end, and for some reason, when you finally just.. Fucking lost it, it really got to me. I don't think I've ever been so upset at someone else being so upset before, so good job on that. It's truly criminal what they did here. I guess they just didn't care, or thought that people would be desperate for a new entry in the series and buy it (and not refund it lol!).
Yeah I really lost it at the part of the recording, I just couldn’t believe after all this time this is wha they had to show us in terms of a new strikers game, feels like they hardly tried
@@oreogod1985 It's good that you did, it really drove the point home that you really, deeply care (or at least cared) about the series. At the very least, though, at least you can take solace in the fact that many people felt very similarly about the game, and it's not a feeling you have to endure on your own. It does confuse me, though- Weren't Strikers and Strikers Charged also created by the same developers? It's not like Nintendo tasked development to a random studio or something, so why is it that say, Camelot was able to do their sports title justice on the Switch, while Next Level Games weren't? Unless the team working on Tennis Aces were mostly the original people, whereas the team on Battle League was entirely different. That's my only guess.
@@oreogod1985 I know, I was comparing it to Tennis Aces, which was great, and Camelot made that, just like they made all the Tennis games, while Next Level Games worked on Battle League, just like they had worked on Strikers Charged, but it ended up being ass.
I hesitated to buy this game because of the immediate backlash, but what convinced me NOT to buy it was the free updates format. I HATE the fact that they lock characters away that should already be in the game for seasonal updates
God tier analysis and rant video I pretty much have the same feelings as you did. It's sad when even my little brother at age 10 preferred charged on Wii! I'd argue that the worst sports game is Mario Golf super rush but Battle league comes close. Great video dude!
Today, we can call Mario Strikers: Battle League a complete game. We got the final update and it brings back Bowser Jr. from Charged and Birdo gets a promotion from sidekick to fully playable. Another boring grass stadium and one final piece of gear. That's it. Game's done! I think I can say confidently that this has been the WORST handled post-launch content for any Nintendo game I've ever seen! Pauline was the ONLY brand new character that was new to Strikers to show up, the rest were either playable in the original and Charged, or were sidekicks that got bumped up to playable characters. We don't even get a small mini-game side mode to end things off? These updates do NOTHING to fix the game's biggest issue being that after you've played for an hour, you've pretty much seen all the game has to offer! Compare this to Mario Tennis Aces and even Mario Golf Super Rush to an extent. Aces saw support for over a year after it launched, it was heavily shown off by Nintendo, and had a healthy online presence with frequent tournaments. It was up there with Splatoon 2, 8 Deluxe, and even Smash Ultimate. Aces felt like such a higher priority game. Super Rush wasn't that good to begin with, it at least got some pretty good post launch courses and even a few wild picks for characters before, and a new Target Golf side mode. Yeah, they ended updates after not even five months, but even that game saw more care than Battle League. It's honestly an even sadder state of affairs than Mario Tennis: Ultra Smash.
if we apply your logic to smash bros, then we can say that smash ultamite was shit because you could play one battle and see what the whole game was in the first 10 minutes besides, if you have no one to play with so you have to rely on single player, then thats an issue with you, not the game. and how many times would you play that mini game? And even on release there was enough characters There are 10 characters on release and 5 sets of armour. And you can mix and match that armour in any way possible. I wont bother doing the maths, but thats a lot of fking options for stats. We already have defenders, pace merchants, strikers and playmakers. We do not NEED more characters. The literal only reason someone would want more characters is for a skin, which by the way you cant even see the players very well on the field that much, it will not make much of a difference. Besides, most of the good characters were already in the game, the exceptions being daisy and diddy kong in fairness though the maps are pretty shite
@@oreomerchant6600 Smash Ultimate had content and variety unlike Battle League. If there's one thing Ultimate was lacking, it was some good single player content. World of Light stunk and it was missing some series staples. Let's take a look at Brawl. Besides Classic and All-Star Modes, Event Matches, and the other Smash Bros. staples, it had the Subspace Emissary, easily one of the best aspects of Brawl. A fleshed out single player mode that could be it's own game. I brought that mini game up because at the very least Super Rush got some content whereas Battle League literally got none. Aces and Super Rush had single player campaigns. Battle League doesn't have a story mode. The roster was pathetic and the armor, it literally just changes your character into another character and getting coins from matches is a tedious chore. The game didn't even launch with Daisy, and I'm no fan of hers, but she was a series staple, probably the most memorable character in the series and she was absent. And five of the six update characters weren't even new to Strikers, they should've been in the game at launch. It had a low character roster, but Battle League's core issue stemmed from a complete and utter lack of content.
After all of this, I'm scared if we get a new Smash Bros or Mario Kart!😅 They're just gonna water it down and wreck it with unnecessary paywalls! Battle League is a disgrace!
One thing I immediately noticed is that the game seems way more like the original Strikers than it does Charged - and I haven't even played the original. It almost feels like an alternate universe where Charged never existed, and this game is solely a sequel to the original Strikers. It's weird.
That’s something I’ve been saying, it’s really only arguably objectively better than the original, but compared to charged, it’s not even close. If you look at Switch sports it’s a very similar situation, arguably objectively better than the original, but not better than the 2nd game in the series
I haven’t played charged. But i can say with full confidence the original strikers game is way better than league. Its at a much faster pace, items are better, the super strikes are better. And they didnt even have hazards on stages and it felt more unique than any field on league. And the character selection may be bigger in league but i dont like how u can have multiple marios on the field. They took away the “captain” role that the game previously had. Like toad, birdos, boos, monety mole, those side kick characters should be there to pick. Its odd having mario and DK on the same team. If they wanted to do that they should have had at least 16+ characters so ur not having two marios on field. The characters lose there captain identity when h can have more than one on the field. Idk just my input. Id rather play the original strikers, but I should also get charged bc it seems to have the same flow of the og and have a lot more added
Being a fan of Paper Mario AND Strikers and watching as both series get beaten to a pulp for no reason whatsoever. Is completely asinine and why I've started playing on PC and getting into game dev. It's frustrating that they know for 100% fact that the game was bad. It's not like they don't know what's going on. There's no fucking way they couldn't. The lack of sales. The continuous negative reviews and lack of proper marketing. As a corporation youd think theyd reevaluate or just abandon whatever isn't bringing in money. But no, it feels more like they completely destroy what they make, even if it's successful or popular and then make or remake an uncalled for sequel after fans have been dreaming about for the last 15 years only to half ass it and pretend to care by making you wait for "DLC" characters that have or should've been in the game since the beginning or an unlockable like how Petey was in charged. It was an attempt to make a cheap buck on either hype, nostalgia or FOMO. It's their tactics of seeming innocent and care free then selling you BS in hopes you over look it.. It's not worse than EA. And Nintendo has great games but it's becoming a company that releases half baked games where they rely on DLC to make an unfinished game seem like it's actually bursting with content, or that they actually care about the stories they write and what makes gameplay good for a particular thing when they're practically teasing people at this point for completely uncontrollable situation even for the devs. They're just eating the cost of the budget like they don't care, like these games are just to shut people up I never thought I'd see myself saying this but fuck Nintendo. Kinda hoping this next console does terribly just to bring them back down to earth. No offense to anyone that loves Nintendo. I've been a huge fan of them but it's not wrong to recognize faults and shitty practices.
Very melodramatic. Although I ain’t the biggest fan of the post Sticker Star games, they still have an audience. Especially origami king. Not my cup of tea but eh. The sports games of his era are definitely mid. However, hasn’t this year been a good year tho? Especially after that last direct in june.
@@tjlnintendo Idk what this year has to do with Paper Mario and Strikers, the direct and other games are a red herring. Sure it was good, but just because other games are good doesn't overshadow the disappointment in the games I actually like, and the fact that they charged $60 for what feels like half a game, and continue to make paper mario at all despite the general bad reception it keeps getting. I'm aware new Paper Mario has a fan base. I liked Origami King as a game out of the recent 3 but not as a Paper Mario game. It feels like with each entry, the devs are gradually trying to go in a direction of what paper mario used to be. I can accept that people like the games and I have no opinions about them. but that doesn't mean it's not shitty to be alienated. Having a genre change completely is normal on a well known IP. That's what spin offs are, like Mario Kart/Party/Smash/Etc. What isn't normal is for Nintendo to completely overwrite an existing spin off for reasons that don't make sense. It's the same reason for why a lot of people tend to dislike BOTW/TOTK for the focus on open world, except with those games, it still keeps most of its identity unlike post SPM. It's only paper mario in the literal sense, which wasn't the reason why I or many others like the game.
@@savagekid94 I brought up this year cause the whole “I hope their next systems fails” felt like extreme melodrama. Especially just for the paper mario and the mario sports games. Like ye, I’m disappointed at the sports games too and neutral with the new paper mario games (all though the mario rpg remake has me hooked at least) Lots of games go through genre changes without spinoffs. Like God of War and as you mentioned, Zelda. Hopefully they can bring PM back like they did Mario Party.
@@tjlnintendo Except it's not for just the PM and Strikers. You're assuming things based off one comment and calling me dramatic because you disagree. Sure It was a dramatic post, as I considered myself a fan of Nintendo up until they started releasing partial games and reviving old ones after decades only to treat it poorly just for a quick nostalgia buck. They no longer give a shit about what people like or dislike, even if the game isn't making them money, it makes you question the purpose as to why they keep making it even if they have such harsh restrictions and low sales in comparison. My problems with Nintendo extend beyond just PM and Strikers. Such as the lackluster virtual console and forcing us to pay full price for games we already bought on the Wii U or Wii. The crappy online that we have to pay for even if we don't want any of that stuff. The artificial FOMO they created with 3D all stars and super mario 35. The random zelda price hike on old hardware. The constant unscheduled "DLC" release for content that should already exist post game (for example, Strikers, Switch Sports, Mario Party, etc.) Why announce a game then mention some modes won't be available for months after? just delay it or announce it when you have a specific date. Don't just add one mode (Talking about golf in Switch Sports here). Me wanting their next console to fail is directly in relation to their expectations for why they're releasing these game the way they are and reviving niche IPs only to ruin what they were to appeal to a general crowd. There's only so much shit I'm willing to overlook before it's apparent that they're beginning to delve into manipulative tactics to earn money. God of war went through a change but it still keeps a lot of what made it God of War. They can't keep making him fight Olympic Gods since he literally kills them and destroyed his land and people complained about the similar gameplay between the trilogy so it had to change. Regardless of the fighting style change, that's not the focal reason. I would enjoy the paper mario games even with their weird experimentations if they were allowed to put more effort into the story and content. It's why I still like Super Paper Mario despite the changes. I don't really care how a game comes out so long as the intent was to make a passionate creative game that encompasses the vision of the devs and designers but in no world would anyone be happy to be confined to a creativity cage. For that reason, It's hard to even call it a genre change. it's more like its' identity changed. It would be like if God of War didn't at least acknowledge Kratos' past or who he was/what his games were about and he was fighting random non-existent Gods and removing the depth that gave people the motivation to continue playing it. PM used to have all of that, but now it's literally just a regular Mario game but an over indulgence in paper themes with funky battle mechanics each game. It's like it doesn't know what it wants to be.
@@savagekid94 Eh im 50/50 on some of your points. You say stuff like “no longer give a shit of what people like or dislike even if the game isn’t making money”, but it isn’t that simple. Like Origmai King still sold well despite backlash from old fans. So its still making them money. Which is probably why they keep going on this weird direction. Mario Party doesn’t have DLC from my knowledge. (Even tho I wouldn’t mind Superstars getting some since its a love letter to old MP) The pricing for old games I agree with, but im happy that they seem to be more humble with pricing like Metroid Prime remaster the pikmin 1 and 2. Hopefully they follow through with that. Sadly Online has always been an issue with Nintendo. Although my main issue is for Smash bros online. The last direct with a new 2D mario that actually looks new unlike NSMB. A remake of Mario Rpg, something many thought was impossible. Pikmin 4, with the entire series now accessible in switch. Mario Kart 8 dlc got backlash on its visuals in wave 1, but later wave’s followed through with the criticism and made them look better. Plenty of Nintendo’s games on switch aren’t half baked. Whether they care for what people like or dislike seems to vary from game to game. Of course the limited editions of mario 3D allstars was horrendous.
for some reason, this was exactly the way i saw things going when this game was first revealed, and i am neither surprised nor impressed that this video exists
And to think that there's people who defend this game's lack of content by saying that "the Mario Strikers games never had much content" or that "this game has roughly the same amount of content as the previous games". Look, on the one hand, I can see where they're coming from with that first one, since neither Super Mario Strikers nor Mario Strikers Charged had Smash Bros Ultimate levels of content... but at least those games had SOMETHING to do other than the cups and the free play mode. For example, the first Mario Strikers had the Custom Battles, which is an interesting mode that I'm surprised was never brought back, which essentially allowed you to create your very own cup, either Round-robin style or elimination rounds. Similarly, Charged had the Striker Challenges, which, if you played Charged, you probably already know what they are, but if you don't... Well, think of it like an equivalent of the Mission Mode from Mario Kart DS, to explain it in the simplest of terms. Battle League on the other hand? None of that. Yeah, there's the Strikers Club mode which allows you to play with other people online around the world... but that's the thing: it's only online. For offline plays, you essentially only have the free play and the Cup Battles, and that's it. And as for my other point, "roughly the same amount of content as the previous two games"? If "roughly the same amount of content" means "literally less content than even the first Mario Strikers game", then I guess it is roughly the same amount of content. And yeah, I know there's the updates and all, but even after said updates, Battle League still has less content than the game before it (16 characters and 8 stadiums that all play the same versus 20 characters with different abilities and 17 stadiums that almost all play differently). (Bro, I literally wrote an essay. I know that's something I wanted to get off my chest but jeez Louise 😅)
I agree! It’s not fair to say there was never much content since they could have done a big brain idea and just DO MORE. It would’ve been something I could point to and say it did good compared to the other strikers games. But we are left with a game that’s a shell of the series it used to be. Also do t worry about the long comment, it’s a joy to read through! Thank you!
14:01 When they got the notice from the league organizers that they were gonna be released from the league and Boom Booms would take their place, at first, the Kritters (obviously) didn't take it well, as they barely gave ANY sort of reason for that replacement. One of the croc-a-likes tried to confort them, as he had some hope that maybe Boom Boom would be a good goalie and a good successor to them. ... And then they saw the first match.
God this rant is so funny. I’m sorry this game was not as good as you wanted but the video is really entertaining to watch. It really made me laugh hard. Don’t worry, I understand all of your criticisms.
Nintendo would have been better off remaking the first game - adding a few characters and stages and slapping online play. That would have turned out a lot better than Battle League.
What an awful sequel. You can't even see the princess's belly buttons. Everyone wanted to see Rosalina's, who also had her legs covered up for some reason. It wouldn't have killed to show Pauline's either. And why don't shy guys make faces on their masks? Where's Petey? Why aren't kremlings the goalies? Why wasn't the super robot team brought back? Ok, I actually don't know what's wrong with this game. Just thought I'd make this joke because nobody else here did.
The game was Shit and it broke my heart I played each game as they came out. Legit everything I wanted from third game...didnt happen. No one fucking wanted armor. One stage? One! One mode. They wanted this game to fail so that they wouldn't have to make another ever again.
I LOVED Mario Strikers as a kid. It was my first Mario game where you could play as more than the original 4 or so characters, and I chose Daisy. I LOVED ger, still do. Imagine my disappointment when my favorite game got a reboot and they took out my all time favorite character 😭💔
Mario tenis aces still did it better than battle league. 30 characters vs 16. More varied courses with actual stage hazards while BL has none and every stage looks the same. Has an actual singleplayer mode. Battle league is actually more comparable to mario tennis ultra smash than aces.
Finally, someone who gets it!! You nailed every piece of criticism: the game feel, content, animations, player choose, design choices. This franchise has been molested by Nintendo. If it went in a completely different direction I would be oke with it, but this is just insulting.
What happened to your old channel? You know during Nintendo's last Direct we got the reveal of Kirby's Return to Dreamland Deluxe, a full blown remake of the Wii game with a new art style, plus some extra content with a new ability, online play, and sub games. Instead of this pathetic piece of trash we got, I would've preferred Next Level Games to make an HD remake of Charged with traditional controls, add in some extra characters and some additional content and call it a day. Taking a deeper look into Battle League itself, the only things new it does are bring Pauline and Rosalina into the game, and the gear system, everything else in the game was done before and way better in the original and Charged. This game didn't need to happen.
I had to make a new channel since the old one wouldn’t be accepted for ads due to age issues sadly But yeah I’m still super angry that this game managed to be worse than the previous 2 games in almost every single way
@@oreogod1985 That stinks. Be wishing you luck on this new channel. I'm not going to support any Mario Sports games going forward. Battle League was the final nail in the coffin for me, I can't trust Nintendo to deliver a competent game without it severely lacking content. As far as I'm concerned Mario Sports is dead and buried and I've got the prior games to play and continue to fondly look back on.
If I may add my two cents: There was a missed opportunity with the music: we could have had a rock-only soundtrack that would have been thematically cohesive AND diverse. Rock is an incredibly varied genre, they could have pulled from all sorts of eras and sub genres. Bowser could have still have a heavy metal theme, but what about giving Diddy a psychedelic rock theme? Or doing something glam rock for Peach? Math rock for Rosalina? Or some old school 60s rock for Luigi? How about 70s punk rock for Waluigi? The soundtrack could have still been mostly heavy by keeping the menu and fields themes as they are, but we would have extracted much more personality from the characters if their themes were more different from each other. Would have been more memorable too. Then again, maybe I would have had an easier time remembering the character themes if they were actually utilized. The music sometimes only kicks in the second before the victory cut scene finishes. I don't even know if each character has their own variation of the loosing theme (in OST uploads on RUclips each character is said to have a different losing theme, but that all sound exactly the same to me). Speaking of characters, not putting Daisy in the base roster when she was playable in previous entries, but making sidekick Toad playable from day 1 is unfathomably disrespectful, and this is coming from someone who thinks Daisy couldn't be more overrated. Also, I genuinely don't think people would have had an issue with the captain-sidekick system being gone if we had a roster that at least included all the characters from Charged, then those people could recreate their Strikers teams. But if the roster is only going to be 10 characters, then why can I only have Toad and Yoshi (and eventually Shy Guy) duplicates? "It's jarring" isn't an excuse because you see doubles all the time during cup tournaments and online. At that point why can't I make a Waluigi only team? By the way, about that DLC, it's been SIX MONTHS and we've only gotten two updates, the last one being months ago in September. Dataminers back in June figured out that there was room left in the game for 10 more characters, meaning these updates are just Nintendo slowly completing a game they purposefully released with a lack of crucial content like fan favourite characters, a task they seem to have given up on. I'm not sure how to transition to this next point but the game's intro sucks for reasons other than those already mentioned. In the previous Strikers games the intros would make sure to show off all the captains (except Petey due to being unlockable) and nearly all the fields. Battle League's shows one field, and despite having a tiny roster, doesn't even show off everyone (RIP Wario and Waluigi, they couldn't even qualify as water boys and bench warmers). The music is also just kinda there, whereas it was a huge part of the atmosphere in the previous games. Also, this idea to splice battlefields was bad from the get go and dashed any possibility of field gimmicks. Imagine if one half of the battlefield has lava pits you had to move around and the other was just plain grass. Clearly that would make scoring easier for one team and be unfair. Having the field be split so that the sides have different gimmicks/physics that just abruptly start and end once you cross a line is too disjointed for the player, unless these fields are huge, which they clearly aren't. I don't know if this split field idea was decided early into production and thus killed the inclusion of gimmick fields, or if it was a feature tacked at the end to give the impression that the game was offering something new, but it fails either way. A sweeping overview of a thematically cohesive field like in Charged is way more immersive than Bowser's Castle interrupted by Mushroom Hills, which just looks goofy. The only way I can see split fields working is if changes were simply aesthetic (e.g. the Lava Pit from Charged but one side had purple lava and the other pink) - which would still look disjointed -, or if you were able to customize your side of the field as to set booby traps or hazards (e.g. ghosts spawning at certain points on your side of Spooky Mansion), which could give the coins some usage other than gear. But yeah, the worst thing of Battle League's existence imo is the missed opportunity. You can tell there was heart put into this on the developer's part just by how much personality each character has - not just in cutscenes but on the field as well. Just look at Waluigi: he tackles by spinning on his head, he reverts to ragdoll physics whenever he gets hit, and he does the chicken dance to intimidate the other team before a kick off. The devs clearly cared for authenticity, but they were probably held back from going full edgy by higher ups who wanted a cleaner game. The aesthetic of the gear system is a reasonable evolution from the futurist dystopian feel of Charged, but it's too bad this look wasn't applied to the rest of the game the way Charged implemented it into it's select menus and fields. So, yeah. Cool video, I didn't even know Charged had challenges and cheats and record keeping until I saw this, thanks!
But imagine this, combining lava and the mansion both creates an unique hazard that is only possible with that combination like sudden spawn of haunted bowser statues, or combining desert and dk jungle spawns small tornados. I think it could have been cooler that way with the obvius inclusion of turn of hazards for serious matches... I liked the idea of different rock genres per character
@@_puduposting I stand corrected, that's actually a really cool idea! I imagine combining Spooky Mansion and DK Jungle would produce cursed Aztec monsters to spawn and whisk players off the field.
All of these were great points. Also, about the losing themes, yes, all the characters do have their own losing themes (both for when they react to an opponent's goal and for when they lose a match to a CPU player), and by that I mean, that literally the only thing that changes from character to character are the first few notes of their respective themes...
You’re the first person I’ve seen to point out the merit on part of the devs and not be completely blindsided there (that or I’m really stupid). I agree 100% that they most likely got screwed by the higher-ups into making a worse game. Fucking tragic that such a fun game is held back so badly
My biggest disappointment with the way it looks honestly seems so little but they all look like happy little kid characters. Bowsers claws were so epic and they all were angry in their animation so when they celebrated it seemed personal. This magic kinda went away with battle league.
I bought the game (whether sadly enough or not, I just thought it looked cool and/or wanted a new strikers game). I had a feeling it was bad since I played it before the free dlc so that could impact it. From what I remember I did most if not all of the single player cups and tried the online. I made my own club since that was a feature you could do. I literally never played coop with another person since I was always the only one online for my faction, so it was basically playing 1v1 with characters you couldn't pick from since there was less than 4 members. That's why I stopped and I haven't turned back.
Nintendo has shown that it only cares about it's big titles nowadays, no love in Mario Party, Mario sports games are a shadow of their former glory and they constantly allow Pokemon to release trash games.
Most of the Sports game and other Mario spinoffs have been like that. Aces was aight, but was on that "Free updates" crap. THIS doesn't capture that Strikers feeling the first two had. Don't even get me started on Paper Mario.
"The story mode in Battle League is underwhelmingly easy." Uh, EXCUSE ME?? Did they up the difficulty in the update? Because now Galactic Mode is humanly impossible, at least from my experience
I looked at other reviews after I posted this and yeah everyone REALLY struggled with it, I think I was just insanely cracked at this game lol I never lost once in that mode
Such a shame companies favour speedy releases to the public over quality, available content on release, and 3rd party support for their product’s ecosystem. I miss the days where games were complete and fully furnished vs. a work in progress upon release. Thanks for tainting Mario Strikers franchise Nintendo.
Even though super Mario strikers on the GameCube did not have gimmicks for the fields at least they looked visually different during gameplay unlike battle league and yes there were only 7 but it was the first game so you gotta cut it some slack. Like it’s not fair to criticize mario bros on the nes for missing modern mario things because it was the first one.
i havent played battle league myself but i had the same reaction to the first trailer as you. began with lots of hype but came to the realizaiton that this game was not it. everyone was so focused on the artstyle and presentation which admittedly are decent but none of it has the charm that charged has or even the gamecube one has. everything from the characters to the sound effects and overall feel of shooting the ball is neutered. just compare a weak shot in charged to a strong shot in battle league. somehow charged looks and sounds way more crazy even when taking a weak shot, theyre not even close in intensity. even the character animations for scoring/losing suck. nothing happens in the background and the camera is too stable, taking away from the livelihood of it all. makes me so angry that nintendo screwed up this badly
It amazes me how people feel they should defend Nintendo’s nonsense Edit: Battle League is also horribly unbalanced, so don’t think the fun gameplay is going to last you too long
@@perfectnamesdontexist Little late but yeah the issue with BL gameplay is that it literally punishes you for playing better while giving goals for free to whoever is losing. For example the losing team is receiving items for free and if youre in posession of ball the enemy team is more likely to get items and hypestrike because your AI teammates are morons ignoring the items and hyperstrike orb in front of them only for the enemy team to take them. If the opponent has 2 items and hyperstrike theres absolutely nothing you can do to defend against it because if he hits you with 2 items and hyperstrike charging goes into slow motion theres no way you can get there in time or he could be just charging the hyperstrike while youre trying to get to him but when you get close he will hit you with items so again absolutely no counter to that. Also the game sometimes give star to losing team when theyre only 1 point behind. Star is again free goal and no one should get a star when their only 1 point behind. In older strikers games star was given only when you were significantly behind but not only by 1 point. There are times when you can be leading by 5 goals that you actually had to work hard for for while your opponent is handed them for free because he received a star and 2 hyperstrike orbs with items from which you couldnt do anything against. Also the goalie feels too rng. While better stats and shooting from good position increase chance of scoring but still there are way too many times when the goalie blocks perfect charged shot from someone with strong shooting stats and shooting from good position while other times he fails to block noncharged garbage weak shot from mid field.
I lost faith in the Switch Mario Sports games when Golf Super Rush came out. Seeing the exact same issues plague a brand new Strikers was such a let down. I grew up with the Gamecube installment and unfortunately missed the boat for Charged. But knowing what I know now, I'll gladly play Charged as the "New Game" and just stop there.
I just missed this video on the old channel around the time until now. I really don't wanna be negative after reading the title but as much as time went on... I am completely devastated... I REALLY desperately wanted to love this game I REALLY do. After 15 years I wanted this for SOOOO long! But... It ruined my love for the series. I am SICK of Nintendo rushing their games and this is the THIRD time since Tennis ACES, and they still do it! WHY?! I just don't understand how forced the developers were having to not make more content as it should. Because I just realized this is mostly in online focused game rather than offline, which is awful. No missions, no story, heck not even unlockables. It is just baffling... Like I said, I waited this game for so long, heck even as my most anticipated game of the year. But man... I just can't help but to dislike it and it makes me so sad to say...
Yeah I’m still incredibly sad and disgusted at how this amazing series has just been absolutely tarnished with this game, all the love and care of the previous games is just gone in favor of…I honestly don’t know. I miss Mario strikers so much
@@mr.emolgario637 No es malo pero como dijiste, es mas como una versión mejorada, no se siente como una secuela, lo que es gracioso considerando que es el mejor de los juegos de deportes de Mario en Switch
I dont trust Nintendo on making new games for old franchises since Star Fox Zero. After that game, I always wait for them to launch a game, to see if it is actually good before buying it. Because it seems like Nintendo makes two types of games: the ones that they actually care to make ut good (Mario, Zelda, Pikmin) and the ones that shouldnt be worth more than 20 dolars (This game, star fox zero, the new pokemons and more)
The fact that this sequel wasn’t developed by next level game shows it all they did shit by not reinserting the same game play as the Wii has the major problem is that Nintendo wanted to bring back childish animation same for the contact and the character that lost they personality same for the musical back ground and the list is way more long than that it disappoint me a lot but I will still play on Mario striker charges football bc I want to be the striker cup with every characters anyways in my opinion all the fun was left to the Wii game and wasn’t reused and that was signature of the game sadly the game also lose the main fun about the super power shot with the animation. The animation is lost the fact that you can score 3 to 6 goals and can be more precise by pushing in the orange space also the guardian content is lost we can’t control the guardian in anyways
I still play the gamecube version (dont have a wii anymore) and i still love it from the trashtalk in the beginning to the stadium chants when you do you super strike it was just so much better cant believe that i payed 60 euros for the switch version only to never play it shame on you Nintendo pokemon violet was a disaster and this game is also just a disaster
Moral of the story: Stick to the wii and gamecube mario sports games. Games like Mario power tennis and Mario strikers charged have content,personality,Nice gameplay and themes to make these games great but the switch games have none of that. Every Mario Sports game on the switch were all unfinished,had lack of content,barely any personality just ruins these series of games which really disappoints me.😔
A very debunked version of mario striker charge that ruined my teenager years. I think nintendo really did lack of mario sport games instead of improving the mario sport game up content. I think if Nintendo did make Mario Sport Mix revived, they will just debunked everything that is required excited, hyped, and fun. Nintendo only now cates about other games that is really important and fun is Splatoon, Animal crossing, xenoblades chroncils, and etc.
if they wouldve just ported strikers charged... i was really hyped for the game, and not deep into nintendo when it came out, but when i started to play more games again, i watched reviews and damn i was disappointed. just as disappointing as mario sports superstars on the 3ds. but just the football mode. wont make that mistake again-
13:15 This is what I hate the most about the golie in battle league. Why the fk would that shot stun him? Garbage shot from midfiled from toad. In charged only special shots(which means you always had to fully charge them) would stun him and in GC strikers only charged shots close to the goal would stun him but never noncharged shots especially from longer distance. Since battle league has no special shots only the perfect shot should have chance to stun the goalie but not garbage noncharged shots from mid field.
Oh man! Eight months and 3 updates later this game is still being dogshit, like. Even a month after the release of the game it was completely dead both on Twitch and in online matches. You can say that the gameplay is fun and the animations are so well done but those good traits pale in comparison with the mediocre and lacking ones. Really pissed me that they shitted on the hole Strikers series.
Dude just because you beat galatic mode easily does not make it easy. Demeech and other people have complained that there is a huge difficulty spike from normal to galatic
Glad I didn’t buy it tbh I could already tell something was off just by looking at how slow paced this game is compared to the first two. The game just doesn’t look fun to play imo
@@oreogod1985 lol bro like no seriously I really do enjoy this game I really like it’s Aesthetic and gameplay Mechanics more than charged I’m sorry but we have different opinions and that’s ok 👌
So I shouldn’t buy this game in 2024 on sale for $39??? I loooove Mario sports on 3Ds and thought strikers was the soccer version only of “Mario sports” but I guess not lol plays similar to it but I hear a lot of hate on it How bout sega soccer slam, is that any good lol
I loved charged and thinking about this game makes me angry. I have never been more dissapointed but something in my life and now it turn into anger. I think this became my least favourite video game ever. Like, even looking at the 1st trailer again, you realise that they have showed everything in the 1st trailer. And it had many red flag that show how the game turn out. I have already talked about how I felt about the intro when you have posted this video before. This Rosalina shot is only here to bait her simp that she is in the game. No Wario and Waluigi, how slow the action feel. Well at least it represent the game well. The content is pathetic even nowday, it still has less content than the wii game, the stage are all the same except the color of the grass. And they was only 5. The roster is probably the worst in modern Mario game, only 10 characters at launch, in a 4vs4 game. Who thought leaving Daisy out of the game was a good idea? How there was less characters than the f*cking gamecube game? I swear you can see everything about this game after playing 3 hours. There is no mode at all and even the online sucks. It's made in nintendo lol. No 4vs4, with a mediocre online and barely reason to keep playing it. If at least the free update came to save all of this but NO. This has to be the worst way to use the free update model. It's only characters that should have been in the base game, other different color of grass for your stadium and no new mode. Even Mario golf super rush did it better. And you know what, it was done on purpuse, because of that "stupid fix it later thing". They made a game with no content at launch and they try to build a hype by adding this that should have been at launch like Daisy. The only new thing about this game are Pauline and Rosalina, everything else is a huge dowgrade. I am close to putting this at the same level as Mario tennis ultra smash because of how empty this game is. And I can't believe some peoples are defending this, there is almost nothing to save. No wonder why the playerbase died in less than a week. It's sad to see what strikers become. 15 years for this? I am legit scared for the other mario spin-off now. I don't want a new mario base-ball if it become like this.
Honestly, those Nintendoomers would just defend any cruddy game of Nintendo's. I mean, jeez, there's people who defend Pokemon Scarlet and Violet's absolutely broken buggy state for crying out loud! And about the Mario Sluggers thing... Let's just put it this way: if for whatever reason messing up Mario Strikers wasn't already the breaking point for fans, I wager dollars to donuts that if they messed up Mario Sluggers too, there would be an absolute riot
"theres not enough characters" There are 10 characters on release and 5 sets of armour. And you can mix and match that armour in any way possible. I wont bother doing the maths, but thats a lot of fking options for stats. We already have defenders, pace merchants, strikers and playmakers. We do not NEED more characters. The literal only reason someone would want more characters is for a skin, which by the way you cant even see the players very well on the field that much, it will not make much of a difference. Besides, most of the good characters were already in the game, the exceptions being daisy and diddy kong
The previous two games on GameCube and Wii had, respectively, 13 and 20 characters (and yes, the sidekicks count) at launch. So no, 10 characters at launch is NOT enough.
Don't come after me because of this, but I feel as if you're complaining about the most pointless bullsh*t ever. I expected this video to have more in depth complaints about the gameplay of this game, but all I got was you complaining about the SKIPPABLE intro, and the SKIPPABLE celebration animations.
Sure the Rosalina thing was a bit nitpicky but the animations are what made the first 2 games(Especially charged) and gave them way more personality and charm that every other Mario sports game ever. The lack of themes and character abilities also made this game incredibly bland. He actually talks about gameplay(Lack of captain abilities for example) but it seems you just ignored that
Sigh… even the original GameCube game that started the series was better. And Charged… one of the best sports games ever made and this is its successor.
I know everyone is sick of hearing this, but Nintendo hasn't been the same since Satoru Iwata died in 2015.
DK tropical Freeze 2014 Wii U, $50, later $20.
DK Tropical Freeze 2018 Switch, still $60.
Satoru Iwata was a gamer first, who understood the value of a player base, what we wanted, and how to deliver on that, while also pushing the boundaries of what games could be.
Shuntaro Furukawa is a businessman first, which tells you all you need to know.
Glad to see more and more people actually voicing their complaints with the game. It's sad that after many months Battle League hasn't gotten much better since this video :/
This games so dissapointing, legitimately a step down from Charged in almost every way.
Yes, some games on switch is just worse than the same one on wii, such as wii sports and strikers charged.
@@MysteryStickman001toxic
@@dice_block???
I Think Baseball Is Next 😰
I watched through the entire video, and throughout it, I kept asking myself "They waited 15 years for.. This? Isn't this just a downgrade in every way?" And I wondered why you weren't that upset, and then I got to the end, and for some reason, when you finally just.. Fucking lost it, it really got to me. I don't think I've ever been so upset at someone else being so upset before, so good job on that. It's truly criminal what they did here. I guess they just didn't care, or thought that people would be desperate for a new entry in the series and buy it (and not refund it lol!).
Yeah I really lost it at the part of the recording, I just couldn’t believe after all this time this is wha they had to show us in terms of a new strikers game, feels like they hardly tried
@@oreogod1985 It's good that you did, it really drove the point home that you really, deeply care (or at least cared) about the series.
At the very least, though, at least you can take solace in the fact that many people felt very similarly about the game, and it's not a feeling you have to endure on your own. It does confuse me, though- Weren't Strikers and Strikers Charged also created by the same developers? It's not like Nintendo tasked development to a random studio or something, so why is it that say, Camelot was able to do their sports title justice on the Switch, while Next Level Games weren't? Unless the team working on Tennis Aces were mostly the original people, whereas the team on Battle League was entirely different. That's my only guess.
@@carnage0685 next level games did the Mario strikers series, Camelot does everything else I believ
@@oreogod1985 I know, I was comparing it to Tennis Aces, which was great, and Camelot made that, just like they made all the Tennis games, while Next Level Games worked on Battle League, just like they had worked on Strikers Charged, but it ended up being ass.
@@carnage0685 There maybe more content coming, because this game has updates???
I hesitated to buy this game because of the immediate backlash, but what convinced me NOT to buy it was the free updates format. I HATE the fact that they lock characters away that should already be in the game for seasonal updates
They have the AUDACITY to put Daisy as free DLC, shame on them.
R.I.P. Kritter goalies!
Taken away thanks to mandates.
I liked The Kritters more, they were very good and hilarious in Mario Strikers Charged.
Oh Shit, Sonic Heroes music? A man of culture I see.
Classic sonic game
Wow this video just showed how much of a masterpiece charged is
God tier analysis and rant video I pretty much have the same feelings as you did. It's sad when even my little brother at age 10 preferred charged on Wii! I'd argue that the worst sports game is Mario Golf super rush but Battle league comes close. Great video dude!
@@Part_Time_Fox thanks! Really wish we got much much more than this, especially since we don’t know if there will be another game in this series again
Even though I like this game your review was kinda funny I am glad you reuploaded this on your new channel.
Today, we can call Mario Strikers: Battle League a complete game.
We got the final update and it brings back Bowser Jr. from Charged and Birdo gets a promotion from sidekick to fully playable. Another boring grass stadium and one final piece of gear. That's it. Game's done!
I think I can say confidently that this has been the WORST handled post-launch content for any Nintendo game I've ever seen! Pauline was the ONLY brand new character that was new to Strikers to show up, the rest were either playable in the original and Charged, or were sidekicks that got bumped up to playable characters. We don't even get a small mini-game side mode to end things off? These updates do NOTHING to fix the game's biggest issue being that after you've played for an hour, you've pretty much seen all the game has to offer!
Compare this to Mario Tennis Aces and even Mario Golf Super Rush to an extent. Aces saw support for over a year after it launched, it was heavily shown off by Nintendo, and had a healthy online presence with frequent tournaments. It was up there with Splatoon 2, 8 Deluxe, and even Smash Ultimate. Aces felt like such a higher priority game. Super Rush wasn't that good to begin with, it at least got some pretty good post launch courses and even a few wild picks for characters before, and a new Target Golf side mode. Yeah, they ended updates after not even five months, but even that game saw more care than Battle League. It's honestly an even sadder state of affairs than Mario Tennis: Ultra Smash.
Rosalína igual fue nuevo personaje junto con Pauline
@@mr.emolgario637 They meant update-wise
if we apply your logic to smash bros, then we can say that smash ultamite was shit because you could play one battle and see what the whole game was in the first 10 minutes
besides, if you have no one to play with so you have to rely on single player, then thats an issue with you, not the game.
and how many times would you play that mini game?
And even on release there was enough characters
There are 10 characters on release and 5 sets of armour. And you can mix and match that armour in any way possible. I wont bother doing the maths, but thats a lot of fking options for stats. We already have defenders, pace merchants, strikers and playmakers. We do not NEED more characters. The literal only reason someone would want more characters is for a skin, which by the way you cant even see the players very well on the field that much, it will not make much of a difference. Besides, most of the good characters were already in the game, the exceptions being daisy and diddy kong
in fairness though the maps are pretty shite
@@oreomerchant6600 Smash Ultimate had content and variety unlike Battle League. If there's one thing Ultimate was lacking, it was some good single player content. World of Light stunk and it was missing some series staples.
Let's take a look at Brawl. Besides Classic and All-Star Modes, Event Matches, and the other Smash Bros. staples, it had the Subspace Emissary, easily one of the best aspects of Brawl. A fleshed out single player mode that could be it's own game.
I brought that mini game up because at the very least Super Rush got some content whereas Battle League literally got none. Aces and Super Rush had single player campaigns. Battle League doesn't have a story mode.
The roster was pathetic and the armor, it literally just changes your character into another character and getting coins from matches is a tedious chore. The game didn't even launch with Daisy, and I'm no fan of hers, but she was a series staple, probably the most memorable character in the series and she was absent. And five of the six update characters weren't even new to Strikers, they should've been in the game at launch.
It had a low character roster, but Battle League's core issue stemmed from a complete and utter lack of content.
@@ranpan6082 i completely disagree, but i couldnt be bothered writing a 5 page essay on explaining why i disagree
The Rage you express at the end really really resonated with me.
Remember when each character add a music genre? Luigi was Flamenco, Wario was Polka.
After all of this, I'm scared if we get a new Smash Bros or Mario Kart!😅
They're just gonna water it down and wreck it with unnecessary paywalls! Battle League is a disgrace!
What the fuck are you on about
I dunno. They handled Smash Ultimate well.
One thing I immediately noticed is that the game seems way more like the original Strikers than it does Charged - and I haven't even played the original. It almost feels like an alternate universe where Charged never existed, and this game is solely a sequel to the original Strikers. It's weird.
That’s something I’ve been saying, it’s really only arguably objectively better than the original, but compared to charged, it’s not even close. If you look at Switch sports it’s a very similar situation, arguably objectively better than the original, but not better than the 2nd game in the series
I haven’t played charged. But i can say with full confidence the original strikers game is way better than league. Its at a much faster pace, items are better, the super strikes are better. And they didnt even have hazards on stages and it felt more unique than any field on league. And the character selection may be bigger in league but i dont like how u can have multiple marios on the field. They took away the “captain” role that the game previously had. Like toad, birdos, boos, monety mole, those side kick characters should be there to pick. Its odd having mario and DK on the same team. If they wanted to do that they should have had at least 16+ characters so ur not having two marios on field. The characters lose there captain identity when h can have more than one on the field. Idk just my input. Id rather play the original strikers, but I should also get charged bc it seems to have the same flow of the og and have a lot more added
Being a fan of Paper Mario AND Strikers and watching as both series get beaten to a pulp for no reason whatsoever. Is completely asinine and why I've started playing on PC and getting into game dev.
It's frustrating that they know for 100% fact that the game was bad. It's not like they don't know what's going on. There's no fucking way they couldn't. The lack of sales. The continuous negative reviews and lack of proper marketing. As a corporation youd think theyd reevaluate or just abandon whatever isn't bringing in money. But no, it feels more like they completely destroy what they make, even if it's successful or popular and then make or remake an uncalled for sequel after fans have been dreaming about for the last 15 years only to half ass it and pretend to care by making you wait for "DLC" characters that have or should've been in the game since the beginning or an unlockable like how Petey was in charged. It was an attempt to make a cheap buck on either hype, nostalgia or FOMO. It's their tactics of seeming innocent and care free then selling you BS in hopes you over look it.. It's not worse than EA. And Nintendo has great games but it's becoming a company that releases half baked games where they rely on DLC to make an unfinished game seem like it's actually bursting with content, or that they actually care about the stories they write and what makes gameplay good for a particular thing when they're practically teasing people at this point for completely uncontrollable situation even for the devs. They're just eating the cost of the budget like they don't care, like these games are just to shut people up
I never thought I'd see myself saying this but fuck Nintendo. Kinda hoping this next console does terribly just to bring them back down to earth.
No offense to anyone that loves Nintendo. I've been a huge fan of them but it's not wrong to recognize faults and shitty practices.
Very melodramatic. Although I ain’t the biggest fan of the post Sticker Star games, they still have an audience. Especially origami king. Not my cup of tea but eh.
The sports games of his era are definitely mid.
However, hasn’t this year been a good year tho? Especially after that last direct in june.
@@tjlnintendo Idk what this year has to do with Paper Mario and Strikers, the direct and other games are a red herring. Sure it was good, but just because other games are good doesn't overshadow the disappointment in the games I actually like, and the fact that they charged $60 for what feels like half a game, and continue to make paper mario at all despite the general bad reception it keeps getting.
I'm aware new Paper Mario has a fan base. I liked Origami King as a game out of the recent 3 but not as a Paper Mario game. It feels like with each entry, the devs are gradually trying to go in a direction of what paper mario used to be. I can accept that people like the games and I have no opinions about them. but that doesn't mean it's not shitty to be alienated. Having a genre change completely is normal on a well known IP. That's what spin offs are, like Mario Kart/Party/Smash/Etc. What isn't normal is for Nintendo to completely overwrite an existing spin off for reasons that don't make sense. It's the same reason for why a lot of people tend to dislike BOTW/TOTK for the focus on open world, except with those games, it still keeps most of its identity unlike post SPM. It's only paper mario in the literal sense, which wasn't the reason why I or many others like the game.
@@savagekid94
I brought up this year cause the whole “I hope their next systems fails” felt like extreme melodrama. Especially just for the paper mario and the mario sports games.
Like ye, I’m disappointed at the sports games too and neutral with the new paper mario games (all though the mario rpg remake has me hooked at least)
Lots of games go through genre changes without spinoffs. Like God of War and as you mentioned, Zelda. Hopefully they can bring PM back like they did Mario Party.
@@tjlnintendo Except it's not for just the PM and Strikers. You're assuming things based off one comment and calling me dramatic because you disagree. Sure It was a dramatic post, as I considered myself a fan of Nintendo up until they started releasing partial games and reviving old ones after decades only to treat it poorly just for a quick nostalgia buck. They no longer give a shit about what people like or dislike, even if the game isn't making them money, it makes you question the purpose as to why they keep making it even if they have such harsh restrictions and low sales in comparison.
My problems with Nintendo extend beyond just PM and Strikers. Such as the lackluster virtual console and forcing us to pay full price for games we already bought on the Wii U or Wii. The crappy online that we have to pay for even if we don't want any of that stuff. The artificial FOMO they created with 3D all stars and super mario 35. The random zelda price hike on old hardware. The constant unscheduled "DLC" release for content that should already exist post game (for example, Strikers, Switch Sports, Mario Party, etc.) Why announce a game then mention some modes won't be available for months after? just delay it or announce it when you have a specific date. Don't just add one mode (Talking about golf in Switch Sports here). Me wanting their next console to fail is directly in relation to their expectations for why they're releasing these game the way they are and reviving niche IPs only to ruin what they were to appeal to a general crowd. There's only so much shit I'm willing to overlook before it's apparent that they're beginning to delve into manipulative tactics to earn money.
God of war went through a change but it still keeps a lot of what made it God of War. They can't keep making him fight Olympic Gods since he literally kills them and destroyed his land and people complained about the similar gameplay between the trilogy so it had to change. Regardless of the fighting style change, that's not the focal reason. I would enjoy the paper mario games even with their weird experimentations if they were allowed to put more effort into the story and content. It's why I still like Super Paper Mario despite the changes. I don't really care how a game comes out so long as the intent was to make a passionate creative game that encompasses the vision of the devs and designers but in no world would anyone be happy to be confined to a creativity cage. For that reason, It's hard to even call it a genre change. it's more like its' identity changed. It would be like if God of War didn't at least acknowledge Kratos' past or who he was/what his games were about and he was fighting random non-existent Gods and removing the depth that gave people the motivation to continue playing it. PM used to have all of that, but now it's literally just a regular Mario game but an over indulgence in paper themes with funky battle mechanics each game. It's like it doesn't know what it wants to be.
@@savagekid94
Eh im 50/50 on some of your points. You say stuff like “no longer give a shit of what people like or dislike even if the game isn’t making money”, but it isn’t that simple.
Like Origmai King still sold well despite backlash from old fans. So its still making them money. Which is probably why they keep going on this weird direction.
Mario Party doesn’t have DLC from my knowledge. (Even tho I wouldn’t mind Superstars getting some since its a love letter to old MP)
The pricing for old games I agree with, but im happy that they seem to be more humble with pricing like Metroid Prime remaster the pikmin 1 and 2. Hopefully they follow through with that.
Sadly Online has always been an issue with Nintendo. Although my main issue is for Smash bros online.
The last direct with a new 2D mario that actually looks new unlike NSMB. A remake of Mario Rpg, something many thought was impossible. Pikmin 4, with the entire series now accessible in switch. Mario Kart 8 dlc got backlash on its visuals in wave 1, but later wave’s followed through with the criticism and made them look better.
Plenty of Nintendo’s games on switch aren’t half baked. Whether they care for what people like or dislike seems to vary from game to game.
Of course the limited editions of mario 3D allstars was horrendous.
You should definitely do more Charged content. Really like your work and there’s a lot to talk about that. I'm sure you know that already. 😅
i have had such a good time listening to someone rant
There’s an HD texture pack for Charged that looks superb on Dolphin. Basically if you have a PC, Battle League is worthless.
for some reason, this was exactly the way i saw things going when this game was first revealed, and i am neither surprised nor impressed that this video exists
Despite having a 15- year gap between entries, Battle League feels like it was rushed out in 2.
Even mario kart 8 deluxe had dlc that was ACTUALLY good.
And to think that there's people who defend this game's lack of content by saying that "the Mario Strikers games never had much content" or that "this game has roughly the same amount of content as the previous games".
Look, on the one hand, I can see where they're coming from with that first one, since neither Super Mario Strikers nor Mario Strikers Charged had Smash Bros Ultimate levels of content... but at least those games had SOMETHING to do other than the cups and the free play mode. For example, the first Mario Strikers had the Custom Battles, which is an interesting mode that I'm surprised was never brought back, which essentially allowed you to create your very own cup, either Round-robin style or elimination rounds. Similarly, Charged had the Striker Challenges, which, if you played Charged, you probably already know what they are, but if you don't... Well, think of it like an equivalent of the Mission Mode from Mario Kart DS, to explain it in the simplest of terms. Battle League on the other hand? None of that. Yeah, there's the Strikers Club mode which allows you to play with other people online around the world... but that's the thing: it's only online. For offline plays, you essentially only have the free play and the Cup Battles, and that's it.
And as for my other point, "roughly the same amount of content as the previous two games"? If "roughly the same amount of content" means "literally less content than even the first Mario Strikers game", then I guess it is roughly the same amount of content. And yeah, I know there's the updates and all, but even after said updates, Battle League still has less content than the game before it (16 characters and 8 stadiums that all play the same versus 20 characters with different abilities and 17 stadiums that almost all play differently).
(Bro, I literally wrote an essay. I know that's something I wanted to get off my chest but jeez Louise 😅)
I agree! It’s not fair to say there was never much content since they could have done a big brain idea and just DO MORE. It would’ve been something I could point to and say it did good compared to the other strikers games. But we are left with a game that’s a shell of the series it used to be.
Also do t worry about the long comment, it’s a joy to read through! Thank you!
14:01
When they got the notice from the league organizers that they were gonna be released from the league and Boom Booms would take their place, at first, the Kritters (obviously) didn't take it well, as they barely gave ANY sort of reason for that replacement. One of the croc-a-likes tried to confort them, as he had some hope that maybe Boom Boom would be a good goalie and a good successor to them.
...
And then they saw the first match.
Man I wanted a new baseball game because the baseball games were so good but now I don’t want it if it’s going to turn out like this.
Yeah! It's not worth it😅
the mario sports on switch is just worse than the games on wii.
God this rant is so funny. I’m sorry this game was not as good as you wanted but the video is really entertaining to watch. It really made me laugh hard.
Don’t worry, I understand all of your criticisms.
16:54 to the end is so cursed 🤣Love your vids! Keep it up!
Nintendo would have been better off remaking the first game - adding a few characters and stages and slapping online play. That would have turned out a lot better than Battle League.
What an awful sequel. You can't even see the princess's belly buttons. Everyone wanted to see Rosalina's, who also had her legs covered up for some reason. It wouldn't have killed to show Pauline's either.
And why don't shy guys make faces on their masks? Where's Petey? Why aren't kremlings the goalies? Why wasn't the super robot team brought back?
Ok, I actually don't know what's wrong with this game. Just thought I'd make this joke because nobody else here did.
The game was Shit and it broke my heart
I played each game as they came out. Legit everything I wanted from third game...didnt happen. No one fucking wanted armor.
One stage? One! One mode.
They wanted this game to fail so that they wouldn't have to make another ever again.
I LOVED Mario Strikers as a kid. It was my first Mario game where you could play as more than the original 4 or so characters, and I chose Daisy. I LOVED ger, still do. Imagine my disappointment when my favorite game got a reboot and they took out my all time favorite character 😭💔
at this point I’m convinced Nintendo can’t make a genuinely great Mario Sports game.
They can just not anymore
The state of the game reminds me of Mario Tennis Aces, where the foundation is good, even fun, but the meat just isn't there.
Mario tenis aces still did it better than battle league. 30 characters vs 16. More varied courses with actual stage hazards while BL has none and every stage looks the same. Has an actual singleplayer mode. Battle league is actually more comparable to mario tennis ultra smash than aces.
Can they just give us a charged remake 😅
How to piss of OreoGod, mention the new mario strikers game
Finally, someone who gets it!! You nailed every piece of criticism: the game feel, content, animations, player choose, design choices. This franchise has been molested by Nintendo. If it went in a completely different direction I would be oke with it, but this is just insulting.
It feels like Nintendo had lost their edge to make a good game.
Lmao no
@@BylethsBoba776 Yeah. This didn’t really age well anymore.
They lost there edge on making good sports games, in general they still make good games
What happened to your old channel?
You know during Nintendo's last Direct we got the reveal of Kirby's Return to Dreamland Deluxe, a full blown remake of the Wii game with a new art style, plus some extra content with a new ability, online play, and sub games. Instead of this pathetic piece of trash we got, I would've preferred Next Level Games to make an HD remake of Charged with traditional controls, add in some extra characters and some additional content and call it a day.
Taking a deeper look into Battle League itself, the only things new it does are bring Pauline and Rosalina into the game, and the gear system, everything else in the game was done before and way better in the original and Charged. This game didn't need to happen.
I had to make a new channel since the old one wouldn’t be accepted for ads due to age issues sadly
But yeah I’m still super angry that this game managed to be worse than the previous 2 games in almost every single way
@@oreogod1985 That stinks. Be wishing you luck on this new channel.
I'm not going to support any Mario Sports games going forward. Battle League was the final nail in the coffin for me, I can't trust Nintendo to deliver a competent game without it severely lacking content. As far as I'm concerned Mario Sports is dead and buried and I've got the prior games to play and continue to fondly look back on.
Or rather, it needed to happen, but not to come out like the dumpster fire it turned out to be
If I may add my two cents:
There was a missed opportunity with the music: we could have had a rock-only soundtrack that would have been thematically cohesive AND diverse. Rock is an incredibly varied genre, they could have pulled from all sorts of eras and sub genres. Bowser could have still have a heavy metal theme, but what about giving Diddy a psychedelic rock theme? Or doing something glam rock for Peach? Math rock for Rosalina? Or some old school 60s rock for Luigi? How about 70s punk rock for Waluigi? The soundtrack could have still been mostly heavy by keeping the menu and fields themes as they are, but we would have extracted much more personality from the characters if their themes were more different from each other. Would have been more memorable too.
Then again, maybe I would have had an easier time remembering the character themes if they were actually utilized. The music sometimes only kicks in the second before the victory cut scene finishes. I don't even know if each character has their own variation of the loosing theme (in OST uploads on RUclips each character is said to have a different losing theme, but that all sound exactly the same to me).
Speaking of characters, not putting Daisy in the base roster when she was playable in previous entries, but making sidekick Toad playable from day 1 is unfathomably disrespectful, and this is coming from someone who thinks Daisy couldn't be more overrated. Also, I genuinely don't think people would have had an issue with the captain-sidekick system being gone if we had a roster that at least included all the characters from Charged, then those people could recreate their Strikers teams. But if the roster is only going to be 10 characters, then why can I only have Toad and Yoshi (and eventually Shy Guy) duplicates? "It's jarring" isn't an excuse because you see doubles all the time during cup tournaments and online. At that point why can't I make a Waluigi only team?
By the way, about that DLC, it's been SIX MONTHS and we've only gotten two updates, the last one being months ago in September. Dataminers back in June figured out that there was room left in the game for 10 more characters, meaning these updates are just Nintendo slowly completing a game they purposefully released with a lack of crucial content like fan favourite characters, a task they seem to have given up on.
I'm not sure how to transition to this next point but the game's intro sucks for reasons other than those already mentioned. In the previous Strikers games the intros would make sure to show off all the captains (except Petey due to being unlockable) and nearly all the fields. Battle League's shows one field, and despite having a tiny roster, doesn't even show off everyone (RIP Wario and Waluigi, they couldn't even qualify as water boys and bench warmers). The music is also just kinda there, whereas it was a huge part of the atmosphere in the previous games.
Also, this idea to splice battlefields was bad from the get go and dashed any possibility of field gimmicks. Imagine if one half of the battlefield has lava pits you had to move around and the other was just plain grass. Clearly that would make scoring easier for one team and be unfair. Having the field be split so that the sides have different gimmicks/physics that just abruptly start and end once you cross a line is too disjointed for the player, unless these fields are huge, which they clearly aren't. I don't know if this split field idea was decided early into production and thus killed the inclusion of gimmick fields, or if it was a feature tacked at the end to give the impression that the game was offering something new, but it fails either way. A sweeping overview of a thematically cohesive field like in Charged is way more immersive than Bowser's Castle interrupted by Mushroom Hills, which just looks goofy. The only way I can see split fields working is if changes were simply aesthetic (e.g. the Lava Pit from Charged but one side had purple lava and the other pink) - which would still look disjointed -, or if you were able to customize your side of the field as to set booby traps or hazards (e.g. ghosts spawning at certain points on your side of Spooky Mansion), which could give the coins some usage other than gear.
But yeah, the worst thing of Battle League's existence imo is the missed opportunity. You can tell there was heart put into this on the developer's part just by how much personality each character has - not just in cutscenes but on the field as well. Just look at Waluigi: he tackles by spinning on his head, he reverts to ragdoll physics whenever he gets hit, and he does the chicken dance to intimidate the other team before a kick off. The devs clearly cared for authenticity, but they were probably held back from going full edgy by higher ups who wanted a cleaner game. The aesthetic of the gear system is a reasonable evolution from the futurist dystopian feel of Charged, but it's too bad this look wasn't applied to the rest of the game the way Charged implemented it into it's select menus and fields.
So, yeah. Cool video, I didn't even know Charged had challenges and cheats and record keeping until I saw this, thanks!
But imagine this, combining lava and the mansion both creates an unique hazard that is only possible with that combination like sudden spawn of haunted bowser statues, or combining desert and dk jungle spawns small tornados. I think it could have been cooler that way with the obvius inclusion of turn of hazards for serious matches... I liked the idea of different rock genres per character
@@_puduposting I stand corrected, that's actually a really cool idea! I imagine combining Spooky Mansion and DK Jungle would produce cursed Aztec monsters to spawn and whisk players off the field.
All of these were great points.
Also, about the losing themes, yes, all the characters do have their own losing themes (both for when they react to an opponent's goal and for when they lose a match to a CPU player), and by that I mean, that literally the only thing that changes from character to character are the first few notes of their respective themes...
You’re the first person I’ve seen to point out the merit on part of the devs and not be completely blindsided there (that or I’m really stupid). I agree 100% that they most likely got screwed by the higher-ups into making a worse game. Fucking tragic that such a fun game is held back so badly
My biggest disappointment with the way it looks honestly seems so little but they all look like happy little kid characters. Bowsers claws were so epic and they all were angry in their animation so when they celebrated it seemed personal. This magic kinda went away with battle league.
Yeah, whoever gave claws to Bowser in a fucking Mario football game deserve more than a couple of raises
Good shit
I bought the game (whether sadly enough or not, I just thought it looked cool and/or wanted a new strikers game). I had a feeling it was bad since I played it before the free dlc so that could impact it.
From what I remember I did most if not all of the single player cups and tried the online. I made my own club since that was a feature you could do. I literally never played coop with another person since I was always the only one online for my faction, so it was basically playing 1v1 with characters you couldn't pick from since there was less than 4 members.
That's why I stopped and I haven't turned back.
Nintendo has shown that it only cares about it's big titles nowadays, no love in Mario Party, Mario sports games are a shadow of their former glory and they constantly allow Pokemon to release trash games.
They made the game "too nintendo" the game lost it's charm and difference it had compared to other nintendo games
Most of the Sports game and other Mario spinoffs have been like that. Aces was aight, but was on that "Free updates" crap. THIS doesn't capture that Strikers feeling the first two had. Don't even get me started on Paper Mario.
You almost missed your plane…
But thankfully, you didn’t!
Gl on the new channel
"The story mode in Battle League is underwhelmingly easy."
Uh, EXCUSE ME?? Did they up the difficulty in the update? Because now Galactic Mode is humanly impossible, at least from my experience
I looked at other reviews after I posted this and yeah everyone REALLY struggled with it, I think I was just insanely cracked at this game lol I never lost once in that mode
Good thing I got the Wii game for 10 dollars.
Such a shame companies favour speedy releases to the public over quality, available content on release, and 3rd party support for their product’s ecosystem. I miss the days where games were complete and fully furnished vs. a work in progress upon release. Thanks for tainting Mario Strikers franchise Nintendo.
Even though super Mario strikers on the GameCube did not have gimmicks for the fields at least they looked visually different during gameplay unlike battle league and yes there were only 7 but it was the first game so you gotta cut it some slack. Like it’s not fair to criticize mario bros on the nes for missing modern mario things because it was the first one.
And another thing I'm I'm genuinly mad they took out kritter
You know the game is bad, when not even modders try to do a mod fixing the many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many troubles the game has ....
i havent played battle league myself but i had the same reaction to the first trailer as you. began with lots of hype but came to the realizaiton that this game was not it. everyone was so focused on the artstyle and presentation which admittedly are decent but none of it has the charm that charged has or even the gamecube one has.
everything from the characters to the sound effects and overall feel of shooting the ball is neutered. just compare a weak shot in charged to a strong shot in battle league. somehow charged looks and sounds way more crazy even when taking a weak shot, theyre not even close in intensity.
even the character animations for scoring/losing suck. nothing happens in the background and the camera is too stable, taking away from the livelihood of it all. makes me so angry that nintendo screwed up this badly
Imagine dumbing down a mario sports game and then it has no content. Why did they do this I was confused.
I have honestly not experienced any lag time in online except for once. I'm not even using a hard line most of the time.
To be fair I haven’t experienced too much lag in my playtime, but it’s still noticeable at least for me
It amazes me how people feel they should defend Nintendo’s nonsense
Edit: Battle League is also horribly unbalanced, so don’t think the fun gameplay is going to last you too long
Would you be so kind as to elaborate on how unbalanced BL is? I dislike BL too, but I’m curious.
@@perfectnamesdontexistEl nerfeo de la estadística de técnica en el primer parche? Lo único que se juega es velocidad y fuerza sin nada de tiro
@@perfectnamesdontexist Little late but yeah the issue with BL gameplay is that it literally punishes you for playing better while giving goals for free to whoever is losing. For example the losing team is receiving items for free and if youre in posession of ball the enemy team is more likely to get items and hypestrike because your AI teammates are morons ignoring the items and hyperstrike orb in front of them only for the enemy team to take them. If the opponent has 2 items and hyperstrike theres absolutely nothing you can do to defend against it because if he hits you with 2 items and hyperstrike charging goes into slow motion theres no way you can get there in time or he could be just charging the hyperstrike while youre trying to get to him but when you get close he will hit you with items so again absolutely no counter to that.
Also the game sometimes give star to losing team when theyre only 1 point behind. Star is again free goal and no one should get a star when their only 1 point behind. In older strikers games star was given only when you were significantly behind but not only by 1 point.
There are times when you can be leading by 5 goals that you actually had to work hard for for while your opponent is handed them for free because he received a star and 2 hyperstrike orbs with items from which you couldnt do anything against.
Also the goalie feels too rng. While better stats and shooting from good position increase chance of scoring but still there are way too many times when the goalie blocks perfect charged shot from someone with strong shooting stats and shooting from good position while other times he fails to block noncharged garbage weak shot from mid field.
I think I know why Mario Strikers Battle League is pathetic.
Next Level Games has not developed it!
I feel bad for Next Level Games you can tell this game came out way earlier than they wanted
I lost faith in the Switch Mario Sports games when Golf Super Rush came out. Seeing the exact same issues plague a brand new Strikers was such a let down. I grew up with the Gamecube installment and unfortunately missed the boat for Charged. But knowing what I know now, I'll gladly play Charged as the "New Game" and just stop there.
Yeah charged is definitely the way to go for the strikers series, and oh man i am interested to see how Mario baseball is gonna turn out tomorrow
@@oreogod1985 If it does happen, Toad will be locked away for a Free DLC update.
@@Bet4th bringing back some GameCube double dash nostalgia lol
I just missed this video on the old channel around the time until now. I really don't wanna be negative after reading the title but as much as time went on... I am completely devastated... I REALLY desperately wanted to love this game I REALLY do. After 15 years I wanted this for SOOOO long! But... It ruined my love for the series. I am SICK of Nintendo rushing their games and this is the THIRD time since Tennis ACES, and they still do it! WHY?! I just don't understand how forced the developers were having to not make more content as it should. Because I just realized this is mostly in online focused game rather than offline, which is awful. No missions, no story, heck not even unlockables. It is just baffling... Like I said, I waited this game for so long, heck even as my most anticipated game of the year. But man... I just can't help but to dislike it and it makes me so sad to say...
Yeah I’m still incredibly sad and disgusted at how this amazing series has just been absolutely tarnished with this game, all the love and care of the previous games is just gone in favor of…I honestly don’t know. I miss Mario strikers so much
Realmente Mario Tenis Aces es malo? Parece una versión mejorada de Ultra Smash de Wii U
@@mr.emolgario637 No es malo pero como dijiste, es mas como una versión mejorada, no se siente como una secuela, lo que es gracioso considerando que es el mejor de los juegos de deportes de Mario en Switch
Well, technically fourth if you count Switch Sports
Damn shame, could’ve been IT
The only reason I play this game is because I lost my strikers charged copy
🏴☠
I love all your strikers videos, and you’re very on point with this game, it’s kinda garbage compared to super strikers charged.
Did you mean battle league lol
Yes I did lol sorry. I only just discovered your channel and it’s awesome I really have enjoyed the videos so thank you.
"Sequel" as in dequel?
I dont trust Nintendo on making new games for old franchises since Star Fox Zero. After that game, I always wait for them to launch a game, to see if it is actually good before buying it.
Because it seems like Nintendo makes two types of games: the ones that they actually care to make ut good (Mario, Zelda, Pikmin) and the ones that shouldnt be worth more than 20 dolars (This game, star fox zero, the new pokemons and more)
I understand the fuck you to Nintendo but what did we do 😢
My random words tripped me up but it was too funny to not leave in😂
lol
Why did you say "Damn you Mario Tennis 64"? What's your beef with that?
It’s the only Mario sports game to outsell strikers charged lol
The fact that this sequel wasn’t developed by next level game shows it all they did shit by not reinserting the same game play as the Wii has the major problem is that Nintendo wanted to bring back childish animation same for the contact and the character that lost they personality same for the musical back ground and the list is way more long than that it disappoint me a lot but I will still play on Mario striker charges football bc I want to be the striker cup with every characters anyways in my opinion all the fun was left to the Wii game and wasn’t reused and that was signature of the game sadly the game also lose the main fun about the super power shot with the animation. The animation is lost the fact that you can score 3 to 6 goals and can be more precise by pushing in the orange space also the guardian content is lost we can’t control the guardian in anyways
Actually this game WAS developed by Next Level Games. Which makes it all the more baffling.
I wish i owned strikers charged.
The place i frequent didn't have it in stock so i just bought battle league.
17:46
What did I do :(
All of the Mario sports game on Switch are disappointing. Yes, even Aces.
The sports sports were good too it not just strikers that people loved.
The other sports.
Typo error here is the correction.
The game is not that bad, yes the last games are better but this is ok. I like it personally
Btw not offensive but I think you are being just a little harsh on this trailer, seriously you Americans nit pick at everything 😂 JK
Same here TBH
I still play the gamecube version (dont have a wii anymore) and i still love it from the trashtalk in the beginning to the stadium chants when you do you super strike it was just so much better cant believe that i payed 60 euros for the switch version only to never play it shame on you Nintendo pokemon violet was a disaster and this game is also just a disaster
Moral of the story: Stick to the wii and gamecube mario sports games.
Games like Mario power tennis and Mario strikers charged have content,personality,Nice gameplay and themes to make these games great but the switch games have none of that. Every Mario Sports game on the switch were all unfinished,had lack of content,barely any personality just ruins these series of games which really disappoints me.😔
...what happened?
Wym lol
I mean Nintendo in general
@@michaelfortheloss292 yeah it’s sad to see
A very debunked version of mario striker charge that ruined my teenager years. I think nintendo really did lack of mario sport games instead of improving the mario sport game up content. I think if Nintendo did make Mario Sport Mix revived, they will just debunked everything that is required excited, hyped, and fun. Nintendo only now cates about other games that is really important and fun is Splatoon, Animal crossing, xenoblades chroncils, and etc.
Nintendo has gotten so lazy and complacent with the Switch over time
if they wouldve just ported strikers charged... i was really hyped for the game, and not deep into nintendo when it came out, but when i started to play more games again, i watched reviews and damn i was disappointed. just as disappointing as mario sports superstars on the 3ds. but just the football mode. wont make that mistake again-
13:15 This is what I hate the most about the golie in battle league. Why the fk would that shot stun him? Garbage shot from midfiled from toad. In charged only special shots(which means you always had to fully charge them) would stun him and in GC strikers only charged shots close to the goal would stun him but never noncharged shots especially from longer distance. Since battle league has no special shots only the perfect shot should have chance to stun the goalie but not garbage noncharged shots from mid field.
Oh man! Eight months and 3 updates later this game is still being dogshit, like. Even a month after the release of the game it was completely dead both on Twitch and in online matches.
You can say that the gameplay is fun and the animations are so well done but those good traits pale in comparison with the mediocre and lacking ones. Really pissed me that they shitted on the hole Strikers series.
Yeah this really did sour the whole mood of this series, this is not how this series should be viewed
Dude just because you beat galatic mode easily does not make it easy. Demeech and other people have complained that there is a huge difficulty spike from normal to galatic
16:35
Ohhhh boy.
Glad I didn’t buy it tbh I could already tell something was off just by looking at how slow paced this game is compared to the first two. The game just doesn’t look fun to play imo
17:45 Eminem vides
and i went out of my way to get a physical copy, which i didn't do for xenoblade chronicles 2, my favorite game ever
i feel beyond robbed
Idc I really love this game and I like it more than charged even if it has less stuff ☺️
That’s great! Curious to know why? Other perspectives are always nice to see
@@oreogod1985 lol bro like no seriously I really do enjoy this game I really like it’s Aesthetic and gameplay Mechanics more than charged I’m sorry but we have different opinions and that’s ok 👌
@@cimorelliqueens9644 yea…that’s what I said
@@oreogod1985 lol I thought you were being Sarcastic for some reason 💀 but anyways have a nice day bye ✌️
You like this over Charged? Impressive
So I shouldn’t buy this game in 2024 on sale for $39???
I loooove Mario sports on 3Ds and thought strikers was the soccer version only of “Mario sports” but I guess not lol plays similar to it but I hear a lot of hate on it
How bout sega soccer slam, is that any good lol
It's good, it just could have been better.
Wassup
I loved charged and thinking about this game makes me angry. I have never been more dissapointed but something in my life and now it turn into anger. I think this became my least favourite video game ever.
Like, even looking at the 1st trailer again, you realise that they have showed everything in the 1st trailer. And it had many red flag that show how the game turn out.
I have already talked about how I felt about the intro when you have posted this video before. This Rosalina shot is only here to bait her simp that she is in the game. No Wario and Waluigi, how slow the action feel. Well at least it represent the game well.
The content is pathetic even nowday, it still has less content than the wii game, the stage are all the same except the color of the grass. And they was only 5.
The roster is probably the worst in modern Mario game, only 10 characters at launch, in a 4vs4 game. Who thought leaving Daisy out of the game was a good idea? How there was less characters than the f*cking gamecube game?
I swear you can see everything about this game after playing 3 hours. There is no mode at all and even the online sucks. It's made in nintendo lol. No 4vs4, with a mediocre online and barely reason to keep playing it.
If at least the free update came to save all of this but NO. This has to be the worst way to use the free update model. It's only characters that should have been in the base game, other different color of grass for your stadium and no new mode. Even Mario golf super rush did it better. And you know what, it was done on purpuse, because of that "stupid fix it later thing". They made a game with no content at launch and they try to build a hype by adding this that should have been at launch like Daisy. The only new thing about this game are Pauline and Rosalina, everything else is a huge dowgrade. I am close to putting this at the same level as Mario tennis ultra smash because of how empty this game is. And I can't believe some peoples are defending this, there is almost nothing to save. No wonder why the playerbase died in less than a week. It's sad to see what strikers become. 15 years for this? I am legit scared for the other mario spin-off now. I don't want a new mario base-ball if it become like this.
Honestly, those Nintendoomers would just defend any cruddy game of Nintendo's. I mean, jeez, there's people who defend Pokemon Scarlet and Violet's absolutely broken buggy state for crying out loud!
And about the Mario Sluggers thing... Let's just put it this way: if for whatever reason messing up Mario Strikers wasn't already the breaking point for fans, I wager dollars to donuts that if they messed up Mario Sluggers too, there would be an absolute riot
lo
Am i the only one that likes this game?
Yes
@@oreogod1985 no
I like this game
it looks like someone didnt kind alike the game
"theres not enough characters"
There are 10 characters on release and 5 sets of armour. And you can mix and match that armour in any way possible. I wont bother doing the maths, but thats a lot of fking options for stats. We already have defenders, pace merchants, strikers and playmakers. We do not NEED more characters. The literal only reason someone would want more characters is for a skin, which by the way you cant even see the players very well on the field that much, it will not make much of a difference. Besides, most of the good characters were already in the game, the exceptions being daisy and diddy kong
The previous two games on GameCube and Wii had, respectively, 13 and 20 characters (and yes, the sidekicks count) at launch. So no, 10 characters at launch is NOT enough.
@@Goomba1309 who cares? more does not mean better
@@oreomerchant6600 Neither does less though
@@Goomba1309 i just do not care, i do not need more characters, i still really love the game
@@oreomerchant6600 That's okay, I still respect your opinion
Nah disliking for the rosalina thing, thats just petty 💀💀💀
This game ist that bad
Don't come after me because of this, but I feel as if you're complaining about the most pointless bullsh*t ever. I expected this video to have more in depth complaints about the gameplay of this game, but all I got was you complaining about the SKIPPABLE intro, and the SKIPPABLE celebration animations.
Sure the Rosalina thing was a bit nitpicky but the animations are what made the first 2 games(Especially charged) and gave them way more personality and charm that every other Mario sports game ever. The lack of themes and character abilities also made this game incredibly bland. He actually talks about gameplay(Lack of captain abilities for example) but it seems you just ignored that
Sigh… even the original GameCube game that started the series was better. And Charged… one of the best sports games ever made and this is its successor.
So glad i skipped this. Was gonna get it but decided to wait