Join The 1% Community Here: bit.ly/3rqzGpw Join The Unplugged Alpha’s Guide to Divorce: bit.ly/3IjWjSC Comment Your Thoughts Below 👇🏻 GET ON MY EMAIL LIST TO RECEIVE A FREE CHAPTER FROM MY BOOK: entrepreneursincars.com/red-flags/ GET MY BOOK - "The Unplugged Alpha, The No Bullshit Guide To Winning With Women & Life:" amzn.to/3fIVW3J SUPPLEMENTS FOR MEN: theunpluggedalpha.com/collections/all-products MY WEBSITE: www.richcooper.ca/ TACTICAL SOAP: Use code "COOPER" at checkout and Get 10% off Tactical Soap mentioned here: bit.ly/2jQEZbz REQUEST A VIDEO TOPIC: entrepreneursincars.com/request SUB MY MAIN CHANNEL: ruclips.net/user/EntrepreneursInCars SUB MY TUA PODCAST CHANNEL: ruclips.net/user/TheUnpluggedAlpha
This might be Rich's single best video, an excellent deconstruction of just how clueless the tradcon approach to woman and marriage is in today's world. Walsh et alia remind me of WW1 generals urging their men to go over the top for "king and country" like a true patriot: what 'real man' would do less?
The thing about no fault divorce? Who said it SOLVED the situation? The reasoning is simple. If she cheats, you do not lose half your shit. Why incentivize bad behavior? Divorce court is miles away from fairness.
I married a virgin for the second wife. The first wife, I didn't really didn't know much about her past experience. After our divorce, I met some guys who knew her from school. It seems she had a lot of experience before she was 16 years old, I've been married to the second wife 44 years, and I am still going strong.
Better to dwell in a corner of a housetop, Than in a house shared with a contentious woman." (Proverbs 21:9) "Better to dwell in the wilderness, Than with a contentious and angry woman." (Proverbs 21:19)
That's the thing. The bible gives simple answers about marriage, it always has. The STATE in not involved in Christen marriage. Its screwy now because of the state. We have a choice so don't use the state. Live where you can do it your way.
yes, there is. A narcissistic one. They will do something, or say something, then deny they said or did it even if they say it via a text and you say LOOK!!! Narcissists aren't just difficult, they are evil and work towards destroying you.
I had a female friend in high school who was very religious, in fact I would go to church with her. I confided in her about my mother being in an abusive marriage with my step father and I thought she should leave him. My very religious friend said that no, she can't, because she was married in the eyes of God and she should just stick it out best she can. Fast forward about 5 years and my friend gets married, big church wedding and all. Two years down the road she gets divorced because, get this, she can't get along with her mother in law. So no. Religion does not steel your resolve.
Most religious people are religious in name only. They call themselves Christians, Catholics, and whathaveyou. Then you run down the last of hardlined, dogmatic "rule-one-page-one" tenets of those religions? And they're just like: "Nah that one's lame, I don't do that one. Or that one. Or that one. Basically I just self-apply the label and celebrate 1-2 tentpole holidays the same way a non-religious person would, and that's it."
Anyone who talks about how great Jesus is is a red flag. They should be talking about how good God is. Jesus had no powers and should not be on the same level as God.
I have experienced how mercurial women can be even before I meet them from a dating app (flakiness, suddenly stops responding, does a complete 180 on her general demeanour etc and other, typical female behaviours). It's truly a baffling notion that some men really do go through with a WHOLE MARRIAGE knowing they can be like this
I dated a single mom for a while and when I broke it off the women in my family thought I WAS the crazy one for breaking up with her. She was 31 with 2 kids from 2 different guys. Im not being a step dad, period.
Years ago I went to the family courthouse in Sacramento with my brother over a issue he had with his ex wife to realize you are a fool if you are randomly associating yourself with women of low value who have nothing to offer but what’s between their legs. As a single man with no kids the family courthouse is the most entertaining and horrifying experience I ever witnessed. In order for me to ever get married that bar is so high that I have yet to meet any woman who is even close to meet it.
I've read a LOT of stories where young men are taken to family courts for a day by their fathers to show them what they're up against. I didn't have to, I saw it first hand what it did to all my buddies.
That's right do your thing be strong and independent you are a 10 don't let a woman define you. Lol but yet reverse it an they get thousands of likes. Marriage is a lose lose for men.
It happens to the best men you did the wrong thing you judged women change after pregnancy and throughout the relationship you’ll never choose right you better hope for the best.
I really wish mat walsh the best, but as a 66 year old guy who's seen the worst in women, ( first wife, cheated, monkey-branched, paternity fraud, wouldn't let me see my child ). And the best, 2nd wife( loyal, loving, respectful, non-materallistic, sexualy available) . Married 44 years. Pay attention to what your getting yourself into , the wrong move can wreck a big chunk of your life..
That's essentially what Matt is saying. You have to vet correctly. You chose poorly the first time that's on you. You are obviously happier with your second choice. Your comment affirms what Matt is saying.
@@Law19157 No. His statement doesn't affirm Matt's. It doesn't mean he chose better. It could very well mean the first woman changed and showed her true colors after marriage.
@@Willie_Wahzoo the fact is I saw the red flags before I married the first one . To young and inexperienced to see the ramifications. Add to that she was a pretty girl and let the fact that guys wanted to have sex with her go to her head, but that's all they wanted from her, she let herself get pregnant by guys that didn't intend to be fathers, she got pregnant while we were separated and tried to say the kid was mine, I convinced her to give the kid up for adoption, took 46 years till I was able to get a dna test to prove that I wasn't the father. She's now divorced for the third time and her own kids don't want anything to do with her.( she has 4 kids by 4 different guys.
@@Willie_Wahzoo See, he admits it, first choice was a bad choice the red flags were there and he recognized them but went ahead anyway. How is it that the red pill space holds women accountable for their bad choices but not the men? There's an army of simps who make bad choices in women. He's clearly happier with his second choice. Richard's own book emphasizes to look for red flags and he lists them as well as green flags which means women aren't all the same, some are better than others, some are wife material others are not. And this is Matt's point, you have to vet and choose correctly the first time, the passport bros have the right idea. Some men require their women to not be on social media or hang around and be friends with single and or divorced friends to prevent them from changing in the future. And even if these two first contingencies fail and she some how changes still by some miraculous satanic effort, you put your assets and income in a trust to prevent losing half of it in a divorce. The reality is nuclear families are necessary for social and economic gain, our neighborhoods are safer with nuclear families and wealth continues to increase with nuclear families. No new children to nuclear families means no new customer base for products and services which means job loss which means economic collapse and eventually the extinction of the human species. Population decline/falling birth rates is a major problem in developed countries.
A cousin of mine who is a Christian since we was a kid (60 now) married a woman who is a Christian since she was a child almost got divorced and did not do it because they had 2 kids and did not wanted to raise them in a broken family. I was choked when my mother told me this. Not even Christians who were raised all their lives in their faith are immune to divorce.
I get it, but christians can be tempted into sin just like anyone else. Something in their faith (hopefully) held them back from the extra evil of hurting their children. Praise God they will stay togther and hopefully do the work.
Agree that the trad cons and their ilk underestimate the amount of damage done by feminism. If there are men to blame, it's the men who stood by and let all of this happen. Now we have reached a stage where a man can lose his job because he said something mean to a feminist, as in the recent incident with Laurence Fox.
To be fair Matt's point is to beat the odds by really carefully choosing your partner and make sure she's got real values and genuine feelings. He couldn't preach anything else, he's a christian and a good lad. I really dig Rich's vision on the mess family and marriage has become in the West, but I gotta say I know sone regular people that are still together and not the kind of "getting bored" and change partner overnight. I mean these people exist. Not all women are hypergamous opportunists and not all men are ruthless tail chasers. Commitment still means something for some people, family is more important than their desires and emotions... That's a model to encourage, isn't it ?
He's in an airplane handing out parachutes to guys that will open 46% of the time. It's a losing bet. You wouldn't eat a meal I told you would have a 56% chance of giving you food poisoning would you?
No, it isn't. Because even in the church the divorce rate is about 50% and once again 80% of the time, it's the woman filing the divorce. That means you have a 40% chance of getting ruined in divorce by even a Christian woman. That would be like playing Russian roulette with TWO bullets in the cylinder. But it's much worse than the 40% chance of being destroyed. BECAUSE the modern church doesn't teach or preach Biblical patriarchy and Biblical roles between husbands and wives, the vast majority of men who don't end up getting divorced, still live in very contentious marriages, where the woman is never happy, constantly makes demands on him and are mostly sexless marriages, or one a month type of things. Only about 3% of marriages are truly happy. MAYBE another 10 to 15% are reasonably decent. Until the divorce laws are fixed AND the church starts teaching Biblical marriage and Biblical roles, marriage is a terrible prospect for most.
No marriage also makes the ‘single mum rate’ sky rocket. So don’t think that single mums are to be blamed alone. Their baby daddies chose to not marry her and just left. Marriage is essential for children to have both parents work things out instead of just bail on each other
@@Killersushiofficial Most of these single moms are not fit to be wives in the first place. Being able to punch out a litter of kids is one thing but deserving to be in a marriage just because of procreation imperative is a punishment on both, but most certainly on the men in particular.
@@zuckthebetacuck2789 For there to be a rise in single mums, single dads (who aren’t marrying their baby mamas, and as such a rise in broken families…🚩🚩🚩 It’s not enough to consider that these Women are not marriage material alone. …we also have to take into account that these Men that are fathers of these innocent and neglected/abandoned children, that these so-called ‘Dads’, AREN’T marriage material either. It’s about time Both Men and Women own up to their mistakes and it shouldn’t be about just blaming women for being unfit, to be wives. There’s increasing degenerate behaviour occurring from both Women & MEN. These same degenerate women & men were prob. brought up in a broken family/home too. Referring to the increase in single-parents & broken families: Doesn’t this prove RICH is absolutely wrong in turning people/men away from marriage…expecting all these broken families to produce loved, well rounded children to grow up, into well rounded adults is ludicrous. HA!!! Such BS. If it’s not this that he’s promoting, the alternative is promoting to men that marriage is a no go, just have protected sex and fk leaving your legacy to continue and let your family-line die with you? 🤡💩🤡 RICH is the delusional, clout chasing, self-serving one. #richconman Ben & MATT stand for real values, the truth and what would genuinely help our world.
Went to several different “marriage counselors”….. The worst one went like this: Super Christian based , John Gottman Method based counseling. The beta male counselor Offered me no option of leaving the marriage , even after several meetings, and me asking him : “Would you tell someone to stay in a marriage , if it was toxic for that person to stay with the person who had affairs ,lied for years, And STILL will not admit or confess to all of her cheating partners , physical and emotional.”??? He didn’t want to answer, And he kinda just quickly brushed it away with a quiet, head shaking, “no” And immediately started talking about Something else. I’ve found most “Christian” counselors , expect the man When cheated on, To “man up” That’s what God would want , right?
I don’t recommend the counselor route. Finding a therapist who is good with some level of shadow work, family system dynamics, somatic therapy, is the way to go. Going deeper into ourselves is far more productive than getting advice from someone like a counselor. I have good experience and background in many aspects of healthcare and healing.
go read the Bible.. do not listen to some western Christian idiot.. divorce is allowed only in one situation.. ADULTERY, be it husband or wife.. Bible explains things black and white.. human beings like grey areas as it help them to project themselves as being good..
If it's only the two of you and she cheated you're free to leave since she broke the vow and at that point it's null and void already. If you have children then it's no longer about the two of you, but the children who you created and their life growing up that will define who they will be.
@@mattthx50I think he just has 2 more kids. I guess it was a magical conception. oh and I am very sure that most single guys are getting all the action they want.
NO👽BALDIE…YOU ARE WRONG. IT’s lame asF to use other people’s content and slam them. Focus on your own bias content and stay in your lane POOR POOPER!☠️☠️☠️
LOL and for a fkng Karate Instructor! LMAO. So the idea that you just need to be rich enough, or popular enough or alpha enough is SUCH BS. Even if you HAVE all those things, then she'll ditch you for the guy that has NONE of those things. It doesn't matter. Whatever you give her, whatever she has, she will ALWAYS want something more, or something different.
@@VP-bx2jj Even if true, and it's not because he was already planning to retire, Gisele married into that situation, and had 2 kids with him. Hint: It wasn't about the football, it was the juijitsu instructor.
Rewarding women for breaking their own marriage/family was the dumbest thing for any government to do. Rewarding women for their bad decisions is never going to end well, we are seeing our own countries decline because we want to protect the feelings of women.
Disagree. From the states pov what is the best outcome for revenue? A single woman with multiple kids from multiple men. Its terrible for society but if you are the state it's great. More kids means more soldiers more workers more labour more housing costs etc. Everything goes up. I think thats also why we are reluctant to put fertile women in jail for a long time.
It's men's fault. We know the laws, we know the stats. You can get a woman to give you everything a wife does without marrying her. and yet we still marry them. What else do we want. The state or the courts are not forcing anyone to get married. The laws are there in the open for everyone to read. Yet we still decide to get married.
Going to say the state wants divorce because then it easier to have controllable people that will do want the gov wants which completely goes against gov for and by the people . Divorce means there will be no parents at home thus the kids have to go to state sponsored school that teaches (indoctrinate/brainwash) kids want the state wants them to know and not the personal values or culture of the parents. Even if the mother is receiving alimony and child support they often end up working too.
It's amazing how many tradcons will correctly point out and diagnose the problems with feminism/slacktivist socialism/etc. and then *never* figure out that those same problems have already had widespread (and basically irreversible) social consequences. Guys like Matt Walsh's advice basically boils down to: "Just pretend it's 1940 and hope for the best." Which... yeah. Not the best practical advice.
This is actually one of the reasons I dont like "The Right" either. Well, that and the spinelessness, but I digress. The point being that they will have all of this advice for things you should avoid in business... but then when those very same principles are applied to something like marriage, their overwhelming response is "Fall on your sword!" Where they can point out the hows and whys of something like marriage going off the rails, but then conclude "Now that we know... nope, that's it, just knowing. We're going to leave the other half of the battle to the Zoomers. What's that, they voted Democrat to get their student loans absolved?"
@@ephraimwinslow Hahaha, good to know, thanks. Seriously though, conversations with them go like this: "Why arent you starting a business?" Lack of capital, no qualified prospective partners, culture of greed, laws are dogshit, taxes up my ass... "Oh no no, that totally makes sense. Believe me, I get it. The govenrment ruins everything and we're going to lobby for change. Wait, why arent you married?" Lack of capital, no qualified prospective partners, culture of greed, laws are dogshit, taxes up my ass... "Man up and fall on your sword!"
@@AnthonySforza Honestly. And then they try to tell you you're a coward and/or irrational for not wanting to do something with an infinitesimal chance of actually paying off, but an overwhelmingly high chance of screwing you. They'll tell you to learn a trade and invest money judiciously in your professional life, then tell you in so many words that when it comes to your romantic life? The move is to just keep buying scratch & win tickets and hope for the best.
The problem is government’s involvement. So don’t get married (by law or common law) and if she wants protection if she is a homemaker then enter into a contract. Child support is still a problem as are false allegations. Shit, there is no way to mitigate the risks, except opting out.
Make your own marriage contract. That is the answer. The rest of the crap is just fine if things go south. You can adopt the kid as soon as it is arrives to prevent her from taking it. If a woman does not make money by leaving and cant take the kids she will TRY a lot harder to have a good marriage. Simple really.
I grew in a southern baptist church, my father was a deacon. Not one the couples who I knew there are still married. The girls in church are no different than the ones who don't attend. I still believe in God, I just don't buy into modern love and marriage. I have seen so many church women divorce their husbands because they weren't " spiritual enough " instead of examining their own conduct. I resolve to never get married again.
They church girls are drooling over men of positions, in this case pastors, preachers. I ve seen it before... how they fight for the first row of chairs.
I agree with Matt Walsh. We live in the present, not the past or the future. Deal with what is right in front of you, instead of worrying about other people's failures or unbelief. The people who disagree with Matt Walsh on this are men who have no fortitude and too scared & weak to get past things for the greater good. Just plain selfish
@@smooveselling3236 so your best effort is to make AD hominen attacks on people you disagree with. You of your own voliton left the merits of the case, chose to make perjuratives, shaming and insults. That is not an argument.
He does not mention the percent of marriages in the USA today. It is less than 40 %. If we will take into account in general LTR's as well, close to 90 % of relationships fail. He also does not know about the struggles of young men in the dating marketplace. Millions of men struggle to get a date, or even when they get a date, they dont get a second date. The last, he also does not mention that modern women also dont want a family. They are not family-oriented, but oriented to feeling and emotions, career and hedonistic lyfestyle. They are not wifey material.
Comparing an LTR to marriage is like comparing playing cops and robbers in your backyard to active duty on the front lines in Afghanistan. It's not even a valid comparison.
@@bokhalikh6248 An LTR can't be compared to a marriage because you can walk at any time. Marriage is the real thing. You're on the front lines taking grenades.
They are still young. Trust me, I bet at least half of them end up getting wrecked by their wives. Their marriages will last longer as they are all obviously successful, millionaires and famous. So that will keep their wives interested in longer, but eventually, the wives will get bored of their successful but still SIMP husbands and take them for a ride! It happened to Steven Crowder, and he didn't just get divorce raped, he got the whole false allegations and reputation HAMMERED experience too. And THAT'S the REAL problem with marrying Christian women, they HAVE to come up with some SERIOUS reason for the divorce they initiate, or THEY will be the one that gets ostracized. So they will definitely set up some scenario to make you look like a monster that they HAD to flee!
The problem with marriage is that you can get a divorce no matter your reason. So now people don't have accountability if they want to leave. If you want a divorce you'll get a divorce. So Rich is right, if they change their mind, they can leave and probably will
@@auh786That is fine. Just simply change your vows from "in sickness and in health, for richer or poorer until death do you part." to something like... "eh, until you don't feel like it". Why include promises or agreements no one is going to keep?
The best solution is not to get married. But, when I see too many people saying the opposite, I ask myself if I am the crazy one. I mean, child support is inevitable, but alimony for life is something I want to avoid at all costs, dude...
@auh786 I have not researched, but I have heard that California had it for life. In any event, I hope you are right and i still think getting married is a huge risk.
@@auh786in California and Michigan after 10 years marriage is for life. Plus they automatically get half of your pension and 401k. Florida used to be like that too until the governor ended it just a few months ago.
I don't even care that much about wedding, companionship and whatnot. I enjoy my solitude more than anything. But wanting to have offspring with a girl of the same ethnicity than mine and knowing that statistically being brought up with married parents yields better results I find myself in a conundrum. I also been through a very difficult divorce with my parents, so even though I was never married, I've already dealt with a divorce experience. Their assets still hasn't been divided after over a decade of separation, and I'm having to deal with the lawyers and all that nonsense.
Sorry to hear that. You’re right about raising your kids the right way. Children develop best with a loving father AND mother. Find a virtuous woman who has a shared view of life. That will be the best option for avoiding divorce. Keep in mind YOU must be a virtuous man if you expect your woman to be virtuous, that’s what a lot of men get wrong in their view of marriage and women
Not a fan of this guy, he & the rest of the Daily Wire come off as smug, condescending & having all the answers when, in actuality, he clearly doesn’t-at least on this issue.
It is worse than you might know, at least in regards to Matt Walsh. The man claims to believe in the Bible. If that is true, then he would know the answer is simply to turn to Christ and abide by biblical principle. But instead he chooses to tell secular people to engage in marriage without telling them to abide by biblical principle. And he does this in a way that implies it is "wrong" to remain single, despite the Bible clearly stating that a man can serve the Lord in singleness and that is perfectly fine. He is a walking contradiction whether he knows it or not...either way he is a man who has no answer for true believers or secular men.
Honestly I hope Matt doesn’t have to find out that Rich is right. I said the same about Ben. Facts are facts and Rich lives in reality. It sucks, it should be different but it’s not so you got to figure that out and thrive in this reality.
Whether he does or doesn't is outside the overall point I think. The man believes in biblical principle, but rather than push biblical principle on people, he instead says secular men should just not worry about potential consequences and find the unicorn of a woman out there to marry. I also find it funny that as a an who believes in God, he wont mention parts of the Bible that tell us our purpose in serving the Lord in singleness is more than fine. So he is a "believer" who is lukewarm at best, trying to solve worldly problems with logic he gained from the Bible, without using the Bible in his advice to the world. It confuses me to no end.
Rich sells what men want to hear…be free, be promiscuous and be irresponsible. MATT lives in reality…with genuine reward at the end of the strong family building rainbow. That’s 100% real. Rich sells Men a con that leaves you empty handed at the end of one’s life…just filled with things to fill the void. Rich wants clout and to monetise his content. The easiest and fastest way to do that, is to panda to a typical man’s desire to hear all those things we have come to accept is fine for men, while being NOT acceptable for women. 3 double standards (*for Men): Total FREEDOM Being Promiscuous Being Irresponsible Men, DON’T fall for Rich’s trap and CON!🚩🚩🚩 #RICHCONMAN 🤯See what I did there?!💀💀💀 Pun intended.
In a cynical way, I hope they do get caught slipping. That would serve as an undeniable public example for men concerning the dangers of marriage as it is currently. Sorta like how the Amber Heard and Johnny Depp trial vindicated the red pill lens regarding female tactics. It's damaging for guys of such status to be so dismissal of the substantial risks associated to men getting married or having kids. Then, should things go awry, and the marriage fail, there's little to no support for the man who followed, for example, Matt and Ben's advice.
@@someone-ji2zbI don't think the vast majority men want to hear this stuff, it's quite disheartening. Your view of men is warped. The percentage of men who want to be family men far outweighs the ones who want to be perpetual bachelors. Good men are getting burned and it's insane for them to ignore the current state of things. It that's YOUR advice, then you are the con man.
Rich destroyed Walsh by stating we males cannot control the actions of the female in a marriage. Walsh seemed to get confused and claimed red pillers said divorce rate was at 75% but that's the rate that women file for divorce. Also, even if the divorce rate is 35% those are still pretty bad odds.
You can not control it because because many of you grew up as wusses. If you don't date or tolerate bitches after a while they'll disappear. The example he gives at the end is a perfect example of a bitch but also of a fool who's staying with her. Most men nowadays have a weak will. The sad part is that guys loke Rich are telling you to blame women for your own weaknesses and everything else. But that's what feminists do. Acknowledge what's wrong with you and fix it.
The clear solution is to only have the church recognize the marriage WITHOUT the state OR have an ironclad prenup that prevents her from becoming a fickle take-all divorcer.
I’ve seen the bit Eddie Murphy did. It was Raw. It’s almost as old as me. He said even if he married a woman from Africa called Mfufu, she’d have other black American women telling her that he ain’t shit & to leave his ass. ‘What have you done for me lateeeelllyyy, Eddie???’ 🤣
I think it would do a lot of good to change the code of family law to something that's more practical. However, Matt Walsh wants you to get married now and worry about that later. That's a suicide mission. Mission denied.
Correct, It’s a patriarchal-induced gynocracy where top males construe society to make it impossible for all other men to succeed and flourish in any way. Basically, non-ruling males today are abject slaves just like they were in antiquity. We have regressed back to the barbaric past where only the top male wins.
The Bruce Willis/Kim Bassinger movie 'Blind Date' has a restaurant scene where Kim's character blows up Bruce's career. It ends after Kim informs the very traditional Japanese businessman's wife about California divorce law. The wife suddenly can speak English and is very interested.
Absolutely change the divorce laws but activist judges will strike them down or reinterpret them to maintain the anti-male status quo as much as possible.
Its not just that a marriage might end in divorce and all the problems that come with that, its that its just not needed in our modern society. Everything you might want from marriage can be obtained without agreeing to a government contact.
The whole reason as to why no-fault divorce came to exist is *because* wives would lie about abuse from their husbands because the wives wanted to be divorced.
I agree promiscuity is rampant, but I find it disgusting with men too. It’s odd to expect virgins to want the same men who won’t wait for sex though lol. Women who have low notch counts will likely want to wait to get to know a guy before they are ready for sex. She’s got a low notch count for a reason. Expectations are a little off on both sides.
You are so naive and misinformed. Don't you know that it's only the top 10% ot to 15% of men who are sleeping with all the women. Why do you think we call them Chads and Tyrones? 50% of men under 30 are celibate and virgins. Most men can't get a woman to sleep with them even if their lives depended on or even if they wanted to. And the ones have girlfriends to sleep with have to sweat their asses off to be given a chance to have them even look at them. For women all they have to do is open a dating profile on tinder or IG with some revealing clothes and men will rain on them. Or go to a bar or club with heels and some hot outfit and men are going to drool all over them. For a man to get even 1/3 of that attention he needs to be incredibly rich or incredibly good looking, tall and have won the genetic lottery. You clearly do not understand men's reality. Women are the ones who are having sex with multiple top 10% dudes.
You are right ,promiscuous behavior is Rampant with guys ,as well as women🤔but this would not BE POSSIBLE if women did not encourage this and allow , " I am a strong ,independent Women ,etc " then these same women wonder why guys DO NOT want to marry them, won't sign a legally binding contract, where the husband is now Liable for his wife's credit, spending ,debt ,student loans ,etc.and DO not care if many guys now think MOST women are walking Headaches, bi polar emotional meltdowns, etc.....😳look at these so_ called speed dating events, only women show up,no men....? Please...there is a limit to to childish irresponsible behavior............and marriage is far past that LIMIT..becoming married is outright madness
The statistics are revealing though. People of faith are statistically less likely to divorce. My husband and I are practicing Catholics, our kids are in Catholic school, we take our faith seriously. But we also got married in our 30s so we both knew what we wanted and didn't see the point in wasting our time. The Catholic church is very clear about marriage and we had to go through marriage counseling before our wedding. The church develops men and their masculinity and emphasizes the complentary nature between men and women. ❤
“You’re not able to control HER…” Weirdly missing the point. The part you control - YOU - is the part that has to choose a woman based on core values. The problem most people have is precisely that they don’t evaluate the health of what they’re attracted to. If you date garbage, you end up with garbage. You have 100% control who you date and marry. You have 100% control over disciplining yourself to understand core values and virtues, and how those values and virtues are expressed in a woman you find physically attractive. Statistically speaking, men are just as likely to be bad marriage partners as women, regardless of who initiates a divorce. But YOU have 100% control over whether YOU will honor the kinds of values and virtues that make a marriage last. If you do this, you will recognize what that looks like in a woman. If you don’t…if you marry whoever you happen to be attracted to (and for men, that’s any semi-attractive woman who “gets along” with them), then you’ll be at the mercy of your libido and your limbic system. Saying you can’t control what a woman does is conceptually identical to saying you can’t control what alcohol does to your system. Umm…yes you can…it’s called de-prioritizing drinking and drunkenness. “I can’t help it, bruh, I was making good decisions but the alcohol had better ideas.” Moron, stop getting drunk. Have a glass and stop. Learn to appreciate life while you’re conscious. Pursue healthy activities with women and talk with her about more than trivialities and flirting. Take some GOD DAMN responsibility for the KIND of person you’re dating. If you can’t tell who is virtuous and who isn’t…that’s YOUR character flaw. It’snot that women are indecipherable, it’s that you’re DUMB. FIX IT. You can fix it by deliberately living and thinking in a way that supports your values. Acquire and live the virtues you claim to prize. Architects have ZERO problem finding other architects. If you know how to design a house…you will have the ability to recognize when another person knows what you know. This isn’t rocket science. If you practice and focus on objective virtue, you will readily identify it in other people. If you don’t…then you’ll be “shocked” when she “changes.” Stop being mindless. Learn the craft…and you will recognize when an attractive woman has learned the craft. Don’t learn the craft…and blame everyone but yourself.
I think Matt aims to make great points. What he misses is that he is a very wealthy, and influential man; so, he might have convinced himself that she’s with him for love, and values, etc. as they keep pumping out kids.. but would she stay with him if he lost his job/status? Hypergamy in action.
With all the other “red pill” and “Manosphere” content out there, Rich always brings me back to center. Thanks Rich, you actually helped me weather my divorce.
But Rich is quite an extremist on this topic. He cites statistics but when he's taking a conclusion he's only assuming 100% divorce will happen and the woman is a hoe. I agree with many of his observations but his overall take is extreme
@djdoomy better to be extreme and be whole than chance it and not be. Seen so many women that are genuinely good women do a 180 for some strange reason, leaving the man scratching his head wondering what changed.
Thanks Rich. Too many of these men that are reliable in some areas of expertise will stray over into topics they have no business giving advice. Sometimes I don't 100% agree with your solutions, but that doesn't retract an ounce of the value of your content. I'm purposefully married without delusion - but I come here because iron sharpens iron.
If you remove no-fault, have fun spending 100s of thousands in lawyer fees trying to prove fault in court. Just end alimony. End child support. Give default custody to the parent most able to support, or 50/50 if both qualify. If 50/50 custody isn't upheld, default goes 100% to the parent who invests. Make it a system of merit, not entitlement. Problem solved.
You must discern between active religion and passive. 90% of Christians are passive Christians; meaning they claim to be Christian but do not practice. This is common in all religions. A person who believes in God and the Last Day will not resort to divorce unless it's the only available option.
Oh there's no simple answer to a complex question, a complex answer is consisting of simple answer, abolishing no fault is one of those simple answer that is part of the complex solution.
Write you own marriage contract and adopt the kids as they come out and see then 90% of woman will be perfectly good wife's forever. You just can't pay them to leave and give them when they need to not feel lonely, the kids.
Here's a funny business idea for someone in the RP community. Open up a sportsbook on divorce for all these Christian men and celebs, including JP and Matt Walsh. Considering what Steven Crowder is going through, give me the over/under on Matt Walsh
Matt won't agree to a debate where he's not the moderator, and won't do it unless it's held in their studio so it can be edited into arbitrary sound bites.
Agree. There are quite a few twenty-something incel-baiters on social media promoting end to no-fault divorce without understanding how it came about in the first place. Can’t force people to live together if either partner doesn’t want to.
You don't need to abolish "no fault divorce". All you have to do is remove the prizes from filing for divorce without proof of fault. To give a simple example: When you file for divorce, you are leaving your family.... *_not just leaving your spouse,_* so there's no question that the children, if any, are remaining with the parent that was filed against unless there is "proof of fault." Stop treating marriage as simply a union between the two, and treat it as the creation of the family that it was always meant to be. If you abandon your family (divorce) without just cause, then you do so alone with only your personal effects.
Yeah, no shit. You talk to any divorced woman and you’d think she got married against her will and was kept in a dungeon and treated terribly. Same story every time. When you meet her ex-husband, you think, this guy’s cool we should ditch this chick and get a drink.
The Romans were perplexed that the ancient Germanic people actually practiced monogamous marriage. Polygamous marriage should also be legal. Any form of marriage is better for society than none. The legal system is stacked against healthy marriage and it should not be part of marriages, society and culture is more than just a legal system. Read Unwin's Sex and Culture Rich. Societies who are perverse and promiscuous are bound to be conquered by those with stricter control around sex.
@@Arthur_King_of_the_Britons This is what I found: "Statistics show that in the United States, 50% percent of first-time marriages, 67% of second marriages, and 74% of third marriages end in divorce. "
Choose wisely. If you’re angry, begrudging, feel victimized, all I can say is you chose wrong. Get close to God, be accountable for choices you made, and try to square things up. Not saying it’s 100% anyone’s fault. Unfortunately for men, that means you need to start early and not do the body count thing. If you’re late to the game, the selection of high quality marriage partners diminishes dramatically.
If you track individual marriages out over the course of time 75% of marriages end in divorce by year 10. The 50% is literally taking all marriages/all divorces. That’s a flawed mathematical argument.
@Truthseeker99991 coach Greg adams debunked Matt Walsh bullshit on his livestream and showed it. Not my fault you a gump ass hope strategist ninja lmao
i married a Xtian who was a virgin on our wedding night, her parents and both sets of grandparents were Xtians and married for 30+ years. 8 years later she filed for divorce claiming i was abusive. and all the Xtians around us clammed up and claimed they weren't judging all while i got eviscerated by the court system. this is a no-win situation for men, as the "manning up" is too late and youve already sinned, without any inspection of evidence. all to the tune of $250k, with no kids and both people working full time
If Matt has the misfortune to go through divorce, loses half or more of his wealth, loses access to his kids, loses his home, and pays a fortune in alimony and child support he may understand. Then again, some guys go through this the first time, and go back for more, one, two or even more times with the same results.
matt walsh doesn't seem like a modern day incel to me. I think he would be happy he has given ilfe to 6 children even if it is at the expense of his happiness rather than live in fear and die having left nothing behind.
@zoomzoom3950 Maybe because Matt chose to marry a woman of virtue and vetted her out to be a genuine human being. He’s not going to marry a girl from the streets, he’s going to marry a family oriented women who is selfless over selfish. That is what men should be doing today, that’s what I’m doing today. However, I’m order to expect virtue from a woman YOU must be virtuous as the man. That’s our problem in todays society, no one’s taking accountability
Matt's Catholic, good for Matt, as a Catholic he supports the idea of his religious leaders being unmarried, from his local Priest to the Pope. He, Matt, needs to correct his religions problems first and then worry about complete strangers and what they choose for their lives. BTW .... Matt's another Steve Harvey, it's just a matter of time, not sorry.
Well he isn't really giving biblical advice is one thing. His entire video and post make it seem like willfully remaining single and avoiding marriage is somehow wrong or inherently sinful, when in reality the Bible says otherwise. There is nothing wrong with remaining single and in regards to the Bible, it is stated that a man can honor and glorify God even more so in singleness if he so chooses, and can still accomplish much alone. With that said, marriage is still a very beautiful and essential thing, but the solution cannot be rectified by simply telling men outside the faith to marry any random whore and hope it works. Instead there should be hope attached to those who are single and remain single by giving them a deeper purpose outside of marriage that we all have.
@11UncleBooker22 Good points you brought up; I was about to place a stand-alone comment about what you wrote. My 2 cents is this: men like Matt Walsh and Michael Knowles (hard-core Catholics), have been brought up with this notion that you have two basic vocations in life: Marriage or the priesthood; ther is no "third rail".
^^^^^^ This x 1,000. The NT assertion (primarily 1 Cor. 7) about singleness being a higher calling flies directly in the face of the OT, and its spin-off faiths that "require" a man to be married as to be a better steward of his household, etc. Even in the OT, celibacy was rampant because the tribal/territorial kings took all the marriageable women as wives and concubines, kinda like the 80/20 rule of dating we see today.@@someone-ji2zb
Join The 1% Community Here: bit.ly/3rqzGpw Join The Unplugged Alpha’s Guide to Divorce: bit.ly/3IjWjSC Comment Your Thoughts Below 👇🏻 GET ON MY EMAIL LIST TO RECEIVE A FREE CHAPTER FROM MY BOOK: entrepreneursincars.com/red-flags/ GET MY BOOK - "The Unplugged Alpha, The No Bullshit Guide To Winning With Women & Life:" amzn.to/3fIVW3J SUPPLEMENTS FOR MEN: theunpluggedalpha.com/collections/all-products MY WEBSITE: www.richcooper.ca/ TACTICAL SOAP: Use code "COOPER" at checkout and Get 10% off Tactical Soap mentioned here: bit.ly/2jQEZbz REQUEST A VIDEO TOPIC: entrepreneursincars.com/request SUB MY MAIN CHANNEL: ruclips.net/user/EntrepreneursInCars SUB MY TUA PODCAST CHANNEL: ruclips.net/user/TheUnpluggedAlpha
Valuable input Rich. The key is to disincentivize hurting the kids. So something like making the parents pack up their visiting bags to rotate residence and requiring 50/50 unless one or the other is locked up in jail under those rules of behind reasonable doubt not BS family court failure to pay nonsense... The ex also can't benefit from future improvement in the husband's situation since she already checked out... And support needs to be limited to halfway between what the government will give in welfare and half of the husband's ability to pay... So basically less than half of the current standards Other than those drastic disincentives, it's going to keep spiraling downward with occasional sudden drop offs
Any plan can be a considered a success if the bar is low enough and a failure if it’s too high. They’re clearly saying you can minimize risk and you’re comparing it to a 100% success rate.
I married a Christian woman. We both believed that divorce was wrong whole heartedly. She now is divorcing me and thinks God is perfectly fine with it. It all started once she got a white collar job surrounded by girl bosses. Modern women......even Christian ones...
Actually, like you said, Matt spoke about the individual vs the group. So, everything you said after your opening statement, doesn't argue against that.
The reason no fault will be abolished to to further advantage and protect women, make no mistake. It's mostly so that women can do what Rich says in this clip: make claims, true or not, and sue and win even MORE in the divorce settlement, or perhaps even have her ex imprisoned to get him out of the way.
In my experience women lead with their best foot and once the marriage papers are signed their true self comes out. Gainfully employed, regularly exercising, productive etc Turns into getting fired, alcoholism, weed smoking, viewing housework as “demeaning”
70 years ago single mothers were fairly common because men died young. My grandfather died at 34 in a car accident and left grandma with 4 kids. Dad died at 52 and left mom with 4 kids. Most of the single parent kids in my high school class of 1963 it was because the old man checked out early.
Yeh but you have to realise the culture and ‘village’ could still raise the kid pretty well.. although the kids from WW2 where the ones in the hippy era so probably the fatherlessness caused that seeking of psychedelics..
Join The 1% Community Here: bit.ly/3rqzGpw
Join The Unplugged Alpha’s Guide to Divorce: bit.ly/3IjWjSC
Comment Your Thoughts Below 👇🏻
GET ON MY EMAIL LIST TO RECEIVE A FREE CHAPTER FROM MY BOOK: entrepreneursincars.com/red-flags/
GET MY BOOK - "The Unplugged Alpha, The No Bullshit Guide To Winning With Women & Life:" amzn.to/3fIVW3J
SUPPLEMENTS FOR MEN: theunpluggedalpha.com/collections/all-products
MY WEBSITE: www.richcooper.ca/
TACTICAL SOAP: Use code "COOPER" at checkout and Get 10% off Tactical Soap mentioned here: bit.ly/2jQEZbz
REQUEST A VIDEO TOPIC: entrepreneursincars.com/request
SUB MY MAIN CHANNEL: ruclips.net/user/EntrepreneursInCars
SUB MY TUA PODCAST CHANNEL: ruclips.net/user/TheUnpluggedAlpha
This might be Rich's single best video, an excellent deconstruction of just how clueless the tradcon approach to woman and marriage is in today's world. Walsh et alia remind me of WW1 generals urging their men to go over the top for "king and country" like a true patriot: what 'real man' would do less?
I was thinking about The Game Of Thrones . The whole premise of the series is. Domminent male women and Castrated Men.
The thing about no fault divorce? Who said it SOLVED the situation? The reasoning is simple. If she cheats, you do not lose half your shit. Why incentivize bad behavior? Divorce court is miles away from fairness.
Jordan Peterson is so lost about this issue that he does not even remember that his own daughter is a single mom.
I love JP but you are correct. Lol
This is why it takes a village to raise a child, doesn't matter how good of a parent you are If society/ feminism is tempting them to sin.
I see it as he feels the need to find her a suitable partner to marry her off... again.
I married a virgin for the second wife. The first wife, I didn't really didn't know much about her past experience. After our divorce, I met some guys who knew her from school. It seems she had a lot of experience before she was 16 years old, I've been married to the second wife 44 years, and I am still going strong.
There is nothing worst than having a difficult woman in your life 🙄
Better to dwell in a corner of a housetop, Than in a house shared with a contentious woman." (Proverbs 21:9)
"Better to dwell in the wilderness, Than with a contentious and angry woman." (Proverbs 21:19)
Watch a day of Deadly women and Snapped 📺💔⚠️They are extremely dangerous esp the covert safe ‘nice one’
That's the thing. The bible gives simple answers about marriage, it always has. The STATE in not involved in Christen marriage. Its screwy now because of the state. We have a choice so don't use the state. Live where you can do it your way.
yes, there is. A narcissistic one. They will do something, or say something, then deny they said or did it even if they say it via a text and you say LOOK!!!
Narcissists aren't just difficult, they are evil and work towards destroying you.
Don't give your strength to women. Proverbs. I'm an ashiest but it pretty good
I had a female friend in high school who was very religious, in fact I would go to church with her. I confided in her about my mother being in an abusive marriage with my step father and I thought she should leave him. My very religious friend said that no, she can't, because she was married in the eyes of God and she should just stick it out best she can. Fast forward about 5 years and my friend gets married, big church wedding and all. Two years down the road she gets divorced because, get this, she can't get along with her mother in law. So no. Religion does not steel your resolve.
Most religious people are religious in name only.
They call themselves Christians, Catholics, and whathaveyou.
Then you run down the last of hardlined, dogmatic "rule-one-page-one" tenets of those religions?
And they're just like:
"Nah that one's lame, I don't do that one. Or that one. Or that one. Basically I just self-apply the label and celebrate 1-2 tentpole holidays the same way a non-religious person would, and that's it."
@@ephraimwinslow That's why I'm careful with the word "Christian." People just throw it around. Every skank and serial killer is a "Christian" today..
Anyone who talks about how great Jesus is is a red flag. They should be talking about how good God is. Jesus had no powers and should not be on the same level as God.
Wow that’s like three life lessons in one story
If you are a Christian you understand the trinity. God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit.
That’s why getting married today is a ticking time bomb.
She can change her mind at any given time and take half of everything.
Watch a day of Deadly women & Snapped 📺💥🔥⚠️☠️U need hidden cameras 📸 poison ☠️ is So prevalent nowadays because so many people are already sick SCARY
I think Kevin Costner would agree with you.
I have experienced how mercurial women can be even before I meet them from a dating app (flakiness, suddenly stops responding, does a complete 180 on her general demeanour etc and other, typical female behaviours). It's truly a baffling notion that some men really do go through with a WHOLE MARRIAGE knowing they can be like this
More than half if child support is involved
@@fgcpeak9591Completely true. Familiar with the song La Donna e mobile by the Duke?
Getting married today is like having a pet lion and thinking everything is going to be fine.
💯
That's a good analogy, lol!
😂😂😂
I dated a single mom for a while and when I broke it off the women in my family thought I WAS the crazy one for breaking up with her. She was 31 with 2 kids from 2 different guys. Im not being a step dad, period.
Tell the women in your family they are too stupid to understand the matter. Call a spade a spade
And brazenly, arrogantly ignore them
Smart man. 🎉
You shouldn't pay for a loan that someone else took! Period!
Years ago I went to the family courthouse in Sacramento with my brother over a issue he had with his ex wife to realize you are a fool if you are randomly associating yourself with women of low value who have nothing to offer but what’s between their legs. As a single man with no kids the family courthouse is the most entertaining and horrifying experience I ever witnessed. In order for me to ever get married that bar is so high that I have yet to meet any woman who is even close to meet it.
I've read a LOT of stories where young men are taken to family courts for a day by their fathers to show them what they're up against. I didn't have to, I saw it first hand what it did to all my buddies.
That's right do your thing be strong and independent you are a 10 don't let a woman define you. Lol but yet reverse it an they get thousands of likes. Marriage is a lose lose for men.
all single young men should be required to go to family court and sit all day and see the slaughter of men in real time!
It happens to the best men you did the wrong thing you judged women change after pregnancy and throughout the relationship you’ll never choose right you better hope for the best.
careful, you're already playing the unicorn analogy
I really wish mat walsh the best, but as a 66 year old guy who's seen the worst in women, ( first wife, cheated, monkey-branched, paternity fraud, wouldn't let me see my child ).
And the best, 2nd wife( loyal, loving, respectful, non-materallistic, sexualy available) . Married 44 years. Pay attention to what your getting yourself into , the wrong move can wreck a big chunk of your life..
That's essentially what Matt is saying. You have to vet correctly. You chose poorly the first time that's on you. You are obviously happier with your second choice. Your comment affirms what Matt is saying.
@@Law19157 No. His statement doesn't affirm Matt's. It doesn't mean he chose better. It could very well mean the first woman changed and showed her true colors after marriage.
@@Willie_Wahzoo the fact is I saw the red flags before I married the first one . To young and inexperienced to see the ramifications. Add to that she was a pretty girl and let the fact that guys wanted to have sex with her go to her head, but that's all they wanted from her, she let herself get pregnant by guys that didn't intend to be fathers, she got pregnant while we were separated and tried to say the kid was mine, I convinced her to give the kid up for adoption, took 46 years till I was able to get a dna test to prove that I wasn't the father. She's now divorced for the third time and her own kids don't want anything to do with her.( she has 4 kids by 4 different guys.
@@Willie_Wahzoo See, he admits it, first choice was a bad choice the red flags were there and he recognized them but went ahead anyway. How is it that the red pill space holds women accountable for their bad choices but not the men? There's an army of simps who make bad choices in women. He's clearly happier with his second choice. Richard's own book emphasizes to look for red flags and he lists them as well as green flags which means women aren't all the same, some are better than others, some are wife material others are not. And this is Matt's point, you have to vet and choose correctly the first time, the passport bros have the right idea. Some men require their women to not be on social media or hang around and be friends with single and or divorced friends to prevent them from changing in the future. And even if these two first contingencies fail and she some how changes still by some miraculous satanic effort, you put your assets and income in a trust to prevent losing half of it in a divorce. The reality is nuclear families are necessary for social and economic gain, our neighborhoods are safer with nuclear families and wealth continues to increase with nuclear families. No new children to nuclear families means no new customer base for products and services which means job loss which means economic collapse and eventually the extinction of the human species. Population decline/falling birth rates is a major problem in developed countries.
You found a great woman........44 years ago. A lot has changed in nearly half a century.
A cousin of mine who is a Christian since we was a kid (60 now) married a woman who is a Christian since she was a child almost got divorced and did not do it because they had 2 kids and did not wanted to raise them in a broken family. I was choked when my mother told me this. Not even Christians who were raised all their lives in their faith are immune to divorce.
I get it, but christians can be tempted into sin just like anyone else. Something in their faith (hopefully) held them back from the extra evil of hurting their children. Praise God they will stay togther and hopefully do the work.
People grow apart over time. It's inevitable.
Of course not. It’s about general likelihood of success, not preventing every possible divorce
That is so true! But the reason is they adhere to worldly views and attitudes, not God’s will and instruction.
@@patriciafix6626thank you for saying as a woman perspective people don’t get it at all things never lasted for long !!
Agree that the trad cons and their ilk underestimate the amount of damage done by feminism. If there are men to blame, it's the men who stood by and let all of this happen. Now we have reached a stage where a man can lose his job because he said something mean to a feminist, as in the recent incident with Laurence Fox.
that's why these trad idiots lost senate in 2022
talking about abortion in 2022
and they think young females would vote for it
To be fair Matt's point is to beat the odds by really carefully choosing your partner and make sure she's got real values and genuine feelings. He couldn't preach anything else, he's a christian and a good lad. I really dig Rich's vision on the mess family and marriage has become in the West, but I gotta say I know sone regular people that are still together and not the kind of "getting bored" and change partner overnight. I mean these people exist. Not all women are hypergamous opportunists and not all men are ruthless tail chasers. Commitment still means something for some people, family is more important than their desires and emotions... That's a model to encourage, isn't it ?
He met his wife after he became famous.
Odds are she married him for money.
hes just some douche. dont take his advice on anything other than laughing at lefties.
@@magacop5180That's not true at all. He was doing podcasts in his car for years and was married even before that.
He's in an airplane handing out parachutes to guys that will open 46% of the time.
It's a losing bet. You wouldn't eat a meal I told you would have a 56% chance of
giving you food poisoning would you?
No, it isn't. Because even in the church the divorce rate is about 50% and once again 80% of the time, it's the woman filing the divorce. That means you have a 40% chance of getting ruined in divorce by even a Christian woman. That would be like playing Russian roulette with TWO bullets in the cylinder.
But it's much worse than the 40% chance of being destroyed. BECAUSE the modern church doesn't teach or preach Biblical patriarchy and Biblical roles between husbands and wives, the vast majority of men who don't end up getting divorced, still live in very contentious marriages, where the woman is never happy, constantly makes demands on him and are mostly sexless marriages, or one a month type of things.
Only about 3% of marriages are truly happy. MAYBE another 10 to 15% are reasonably decent.
Until the divorce laws are fixed AND the church starts teaching Biblical marriage and Biblical roles, marriage is a terrible prospect for most.
Acquiring a marriage certificate has long been shown to not improve the quality of a relationship.
Why get the government involved?
Once she gets her wedding, house and children, the bedroom fun basically disappears.
No marriage also makes the ‘single mum rate’ sky rocket.
So don’t think that single mums are to be blamed alone.
Their baby daddies chose to not marry her and just left.
Marriage is essential for children to have both parents work things out instead of just bail on each other
@@Killersushiofficial Most of these single moms are not fit to be wives in the first place. Being able to punch out a litter of kids is one thing but deserving to be in a marriage just because of procreation imperative is a punishment on both, but most certainly on the men in particular.
@@zuckthebetacuck2789 For there to be a rise in single mums, single dads (who aren’t marrying their baby mamas, and as such a rise in broken families…🚩🚩🚩
It’s not enough to consider that these Women are not marriage material alone.
…we also have to take into account that these Men that are fathers of these innocent and neglected/abandoned children, that these so-called ‘Dads’, AREN’T marriage material either.
It’s about time Both Men and Women own up to their mistakes and it shouldn’t be about just blaming women for being unfit, to be wives.
There’s increasing degenerate behaviour occurring from both Women & MEN.
These same degenerate women & men were prob. brought up in a broken family/home too.
Referring to the increase in single-parents & broken families:
Doesn’t this prove RICH is absolutely wrong in turning people/men away from marriage…expecting all these broken families to produce loved, well rounded children to grow up, into well rounded adults is ludicrous.
HA!!! Such BS.
If it’s not this that he’s promoting, the alternative is promoting to men that marriage is a no go, just have protected sex and fk leaving your legacy to continue and let your family-line die with you?
🤡💩🤡
RICH is the delusional, clout chasing, self-serving one. #richconman
Ben & MATT stand for real values, the truth and what would genuinely help our world.
Went to several different “marriage counselors”…..
The worst one went like this:
Super Christian based ,
John Gottman
Method based counseling.
The beta male counselor
Offered me no option of leaving the marriage , even after several meetings, and me asking him :
“Would you tell someone to stay in a marriage ,
if it was toxic for that person to stay with the person who had affairs ,lied for years,
And
STILL will not admit or confess to all of her cheating partners , physical and emotional.”???
He didn’t want to answer,
And he kinda just quickly brushed it away with a quiet, head shaking, “no”
And immediately started talking about
Something else.
I’ve found most “Christian” counselors , expect the man
When cheated on,
To “man up”
That’s what God would want , right?
I don’t recommend the counselor route. Finding a therapist who is good with some level of shadow work, family system dynamics, somatic therapy, is the way to go.
Going deeper into ourselves is far more productive than getting advice from someone like a counselor.
I have good experience and background in many aspects of healthcare and healing.
The purpose of going to a counselor is to make it work. If you want to leave then leave. You don’t need another person to validate your decision.
I’m a Christian and adultery is an allowable reason for divorce if you’re aren’t aware.
go read the Bible.. do not listen to some western Christian idiot.. divorce is allowed only in one situation.. ADULTERY, be it husband or wife.. Bible explains things black and white.. human beings like grey areas as it help them to project themselves as being good..
If it's only the two of you and she cheated you're free to leave since she broke the vow and at that point it's null and void already. If you have children then it's no longer about the two of you, but the children who you created and their life growing up that will define who they will be.
Matt Walsh is right on lots of points. Just not marriage.
@@mattthx50yep
If he wants extol the virtues of marriage, fine. But his tactic is to shame men into doing it. We're losers if we don't.
@@mattthx50I think he just has 2 more kids. I guess it was a magical conception. oh and I am very sure that most single guys are getting all the action they want.
NO👽BALDIE…YOU ARE WRONG.
IT’s lame asF to use other people’s content and slam them.
Focus on your own bias content and stay in your lane POOR POOPER!☠️☠️☠️
Just wait until he gets cucked. He'll change his tune. 🙃
The Ultimate Red Pill: Tom Brady, total alpha male, 6'4 handsome millionaire, best quarterback of all time, got ditched by his wife.
LOL and for a fkng Karate Instructor! LMAO.
So the idea that you just need to be rich enough, or popular enough or alpha enough is SUCH BS. Even if you HAVE all those things, then she'll ditch you for the guy that has NONE of those things. It doesn't matter. Whatever you give her, whatever she has, she will ALWAYS want something more, or something different.
His life partner was football, not Gisele.
@@VP-bx2jj Even if true, and it's not because he was already planning to retire, Gisele married into that situation, and had 2 kids with him. Hint: It wasn't about the football, it was the juijitsu instructor.
He is not alpha
He can easily find another model!
Rewarding women for breaking their own marriage/family was the dumbest thing for any government to do. Rewarding women for their bad decisions is never going to end well, we are seeing our own countries decline because we want to protect the feelings of women.
Disagree. From the states pov what is the best outcome for revenue? A single woman with multiple kids from multiple men. Its terrible for society but if you are the state it's great. More kids means more soldiers more workers more labour more housing costs etc. Everything goes up. I think thats also why we are reluctant to put fertile women in jail for a long time.
The point WAS to destroy marriage and end the union between men and women. Everything you’re seeing is what the system intended from the start
It's men's fault. We know the laws, we know the stats. You can get a woman to give you everything a wife does without marrying her.
and yet we still marry them.
What else do we want.
The state or the courts are not forcing anyone to get married.
The laws are there in the open for everyone to read.
Yet we still decide to get married.
Going to say the state wants divorce because then it easier to have controllable people that will do want the gov wants which completely goes against gov for and by the people . Divorce means there will be no parents at home thus the kids have to go to state sponsored school that teaches (indoctrinate/brainwash) kids want the state wants them to know and not the personal values or culture of the parents. Even if the mother is receiving alimony and child support they often end up working too.
By design
Matt is totally off base on this topic, thanks for making this video
It's amazing how many tradcons will correctly point out and diagnose the problems with feminism/slacktivist socialism/etc. and then *never* figure out that those same problems have already had widespread (and basically irreversible) social consequences.
Guys like Matt Walsh's advice basically boils down to:
"Just pretend it's 1940 and hope for the best."
Which... yeah. Not the best practical advice.
Tradcons are so dumb, and im very right wing
This is actually one of the reasons I dont like "The Right" either. Well, that and the spinelessness, but I digress. The point being that they will have all of this advice for things you should avoid in business... but then when those very same principles are applied to something like marriage, their overwhelming response is "Fall on your sword!"
Where they can point out the hows and whys of something like marriage going off the rails, but then conclude "Now that we know... nope, that's it, just knowing. We're going to leave the other half of the battle to the Zoomers. What's that, they voted Democrat to get their student loans absolved?"
@@AnthonySforza
I know you couldn't see or hear it, but I physically applauded when I read that post.
@@ephraimwinslow
Hahaha, good to know, thanks. Seriously though, conversations with them go like this:
"Why arent you starting a business?"
Lack of capital, no qualified prospective partners, culture of greed, laws are dogshit, taxes up my ass...
"Oh no no, that totally makes sense. Believe me, I get it. The govenrment ruins everything and we're going to lobby for change. Wait, why arent you married?"
Lack of capital, no qualified prospective partners, culture of greed, laws are dogshit, taxes up my ass...
"Man up and fall on your sword!"
@@AnthonySforza
Honestly.
And then they try to tell you you're a coward and/or irrational for not wanting to do something with an infinitesimal chance of actually paying off, but an overwhelmingly high chance of screwing you.
They'll tell you to learn a trade and invest money judiciously in your professional life, then tell you in so many words that when it comes to your romantic life?
The move is to just keep buying scratch & win tickets and hope for the best.
The problem is government’s involvement. So don’t get married (by law or common law) and if she wants protection if she is a homemaker then enter into a contract. Child support is still a problem as are false allegations. Shit, there is no way to mitigate the risks, except opting out.
Make your own marriage contract. That is the answer. The rest of the crap is just fine if things go south. You can adopt the kid as soon as it is arrives to prevent her from taking it. If a woman does not make money by leaving and cant take the kids she will TRY a lot harder to have a good marriage. Simple really.
If you don’t play the game you can’t lose. Enjoy it from the sidelines if you get my drift 🎉
I grew in a southern baptist church, my father was a deacon. Not one the couples who I knew there are still married. The girls in church are no different than the ones who don't attend. I still believe in God, I just don't buy into modern love and marriage. I have seen so many church women divorce their husbands because they weren't " spiritual enough " instead of examining their own conduct. I resolve to never get married again.
They church girls are drooling over men of positions, in this case pastors, preachers. I ve seen it before... how they fight for the first row of chairs.
90% of the people who commented on Matt Walsh's video on marriage disagreed with him, so go figure.
I agree with Matt Walsh. We live in the present, not the past or the future. Deal with what is right in front of you, instead of worrying about other people's failures or unbelief. The people who disagree with Matt Walsh on this are men who have no fortitude and too scared & weak to get past things for the greater good. Just plain selfish
@@smooveselling3236 so your best effort is to make AD hominen attacks on people you disagree with. You of your own voliton left the merits of the case, chose to make perjuratives, shaming and insults. That is not an argument.
yeah most likely even they know it is problematic but won't speak
just like crime rates
@VeeShenge like I said, a bunch of weak cowardly men who can't get past hurt and hurting others as well as themselves
@@smooveselling3236keep it pushing keisha. We know it’s you behind that innocent man’s profile photo.
He does not mention the percent of marriages in the USA today. It is less than 40 %. If we will take into account in general LTR's as well, close to 90 % of relationships fail.
He also does not know about the struggles of young men in the dating marketplace. Millions of men struggle to get a date, or even when they get a date, they dont get a second date.
The last, he also does not mention that modern women also dont want a family. They are not family-oriented, but oriented to feeling and emotions, career and hedonistic lyfestyle. They are not wifey material.
Comparing an LTR to marriage is like comparing playing cops and robbers in your backyard to active duty on the front lines in Afghanistan.
It's not even a valid comparison.
@@DPMusicStudio what do you mean? Can you clarify?
@@bokhalikh6248 An LTR can't be compared to a marriage because you can walk at any time.
Marriage is the real thing. You're on the front lines taking grenades.
@@DPMusicStudiounless you hit the common law marriage snag.
@@DPMusicStudio "...because you can walk at any time" You're joking right? This must be a troll
Sadly, the DW team is too far removed from current dating to be able to understand the struggle
They were never even in the dating game, they just popped the question on the second date. Or so they'd have everyone believe... 😆
It’s against their business model to acknowledge the real problem and admit the red pill is right
They are still young. Trust me, I bet at least half of them end up getting wrecked by their wives. Their marriages will last longer as they are all obviously successful, millionaires and famous. So that will keep their wives interested in longer, but eventually, the wives will get bored of their successful but still SIMP husbands and take them for a ride!
It happened to Steven Crowder, and he didn't just get divorce raped, he got the whole false allegations and reputation HAMMERED experience too.
And THAT'S the REAL problem with marrying Christian women, they HAVE to come up with some SERIOUS reason for the divorce they initiate, or THEY will be the one that gets ostracized. So they will definitely set up some scenario to make you look like a monster that they HAD to flee!
The problem with marriage is that you can get a divorce no matter your reason. So now people don't have accountability if they want to leave. If you want a divorce you'll get a divorce. So Rich is right, if they change their mind, they can leave and probably will
Why would you want them to stay if they don’t want to
@@auh786 the problem isn't if they stay or leave. Its that they take half or over half on their way out through no fault. Legalized robbery
@@auh786That is fine.
Just simply change your vows from "in sickness and in health, for richer or poorer until death do you part." to something like... "eh, until you don't feel like it".
Why include promises or agreements no one is going to keep?
@@inquisitor4635 yep, anybody that gets married with those vows and then divorces without the other person breaking them is literally lying
Marriage is also just about checking a box for many, and having a special day.
I know a man that was a pastor and has been married for over 50 years and wife still wanted to get divorced.
The best solution is not to get married. But, when I see too many people saying the opposite, I ask myself if I am the crazy one. I mean, child support is inevitable, but alimony for life is something I want to avoid at all costs, dude...
Alimony for life is extremely rare. Most cases you get rehabilitative alimony for a couple of years, if even.
@auh786 I have not researched, but I have heard that California had it for life. In any event, I hope you are right and i still think getting married is a huge risk.
@@emmanuelkofyagyapong6382Definitely a risk if you have kids and/or unequal incomes.
@@auh786in California and Michigan after 10 years marriage is for life. Plus they automatically get half of your pension and 401k.
Florida used to be like that too until the governor ended it just a few months ago.
if she has a job and makes decent money you arent going to be paying alimony. If she stays home and is a house wife, all bets are off
I don't even care that much about wedding, companionship and whatnot. I enjoy my solitude more than anything. But wanting to have offspring with a girl of the same ethnicity than mine and knowing that statistically being brought up with married parents yields better results I find myself in a conundrum. I also been through a very difficult divorce with my parents, so even though I was never married, I've already dealt with a divorce experience. Their assets still hasn't been divided after over a decade of separation, and I'm having to deal with the lawyers and all that nonsense.
Sorry to hear that. You’re right about raising your kids the right way. Children develop best with a loving father AND mother. Find a virtuous woman who has a shared view of life. That will be the best option for avoiding divorce. Keep in mind YOU must be a virtuous man if you expect your woman to be virtuous, that’s what a lot of men get wrong in their view of marriage and women
Not a fan of this guy, he & the rest of the Daily Wire come off as smug, condescending & having all the answers when, in actuality, he clearly doesn’t-at least on this issue.
But he's making you think about this stuff , so he's doing his job.. he tells you to think with the big head, not the little one.
@@themick6586big head always prevails
I agree Mike, they are the milder breed of Neo-Cons, but Neo-cons nonetheless and thus can't be trusted.
The daily wire is garbage. Spread the word. Men should not patronize their content
It is worse than you might know, at least in regards to Matt Walsh.
The man claims to believe in the Bible. If that is true, then he would know the answer is simply to turn to Christ and abide by biblical principle. But instead he chooses to tell secular people to engage in marriage without telling them to abide by biblical principle. And he does this in a way that implies it is "wrong" to remain single, despite the Bible clearly stating that a man can serve the Lord in singleness and that is perfectly fine.
He is a walking contradiction whether he knows it or not...either way he is a man who has no answer for true believers or secular men.
JP is a perfect example of someone who teaches hand to hand combat yet has never been in a fight.
yeah sure. He has been married for several decades. ok. whatever you say.
His marriage seems pretty solid to me. They genuinely are still in love and you can tell. Sounds like a win.
Next time you have a thought, let it go.
@@Bucephalus84 just because HIS marriage seems solid, doesnt mean he can get to say to others to get married...
just because HIS marriage seems solid, doesnt mean he can get to say to others to get married... @@adk46er5203
Honestly I hope Matt doesn’t have to find out that Rich is right. I said the same about Ben.
Facts are facts and Rich lives in reality. It sucks, it should be different but it’s not so you got to figure that out and thrive in this reality.
thet both live in reality. just different circumstances.
Whether he does or doesn't is outside the overall point I think.
The man believes in biblical principle, but rather than push biblical principle on people, he instead says secular men should just not worry about potential consequences and find the unicorn of a woman out there to marry.
I also find it funny that as a an who believes in God, he wont mention parts of the Bible that tell us our purpose in serving the Lord in singleness is more than fine. So he is a "believer" who is lukewarm at best, trying to solve worldly problems with logic he gained from the Bible, without using the Bible in his advice to the world. It confuses me to no end.
Rich sells what men want to hear…be free, be promiscuous and be irresponsible.
MATT lives in reality…with genuine reward at the end of the strong family building rainbow.
That’s 100% real.
Rich sells Men a con that leaves you empty handed at the end of one’s life…just filled with things to fill the void.
Rich wants clout and to monetise his content.
The easiest and fastest way to do that, is to panda to a typical man’s desire to hear all those things we have come to accept is fine for men, while being NOT acceptable for women.
3 double standards (*for Men):
Total FREEDOM
Being Promiscuous
Being Irresponsible
Men, DON’T fall for Rich’s trap and CON!🚩🚩🚩
#RICHCONMAN
🤯See what I did there?!💀💀💀
Pun intended.
In a cynical way, I hope they do get caught slipping. That would serve as an undeniable public example for men concerning the dangers of marriage as it is currently. Sorta like how the Amber Heard and Johnny Depp trial vindicated the red pill lens regarding female tactics. It's damaging for guys of such status to be so dismissal of the substantial risks associated to men getting married or having kids. Then, should things go awry, and the marriage fail, there's little to no support for the man who followed, for example, Matt and Ben's advice.
@@someone-ji2zbI don't think the vast majority men want to hear this stuff, it's quite disheartening. Your view of men is warped. The percentage of men who want to be family men far outweighs the ones who want to be perpetual bachelors. Good men are getting burned and it's insane for them to ignore the current state of things. It that's YOUR advice, then you are the con man.
I root for marriage, but I never hold my breath.
Rich destroyed Walsh by stating we males cannot control the actions of the female in a marriage. Walsh seemed to get confused and claimed red pillers said divorce rate was at 75% but that's the rate that women file for divorce. Also, even if the divorce rate is 35% those are still pretty bad odds.
You can not control it because because many of you grew up as wusses. If you don't date or tolerate bitches after a while they'll disappear. The example he gives at the end is a perfect example of a bitch but also of a fool who's staying with her.
Most men nowadays have a weak will. The sad part is that guys loke Rich are telling you to blame women for your own weaknesses and everything else. But that's what feminists do.
Acknowledge what's wrong with you and fix it.
The clear solution is to only have the church recognize the marriage WITHOUT the state OR have an ironclad prenup that prevents her from becoming a fickle take-all divorcer.
Feb 22, 2019 - Recent studies suggest women grow disinterested in sex with a long-term sexual partner faster than men.
A lot of married men are happy to get any at all
I’ve seen the bit Eddie Murphy did. It was Raw. It’s almost as old as me. He said even if he married a woman from Africa called Mfufu, she’d have other black American women telling her that he ain’t shit & to leave his ass. ‘What have you done for me lateeeelllyyy, Eddie???’ 🤣
goony googoo
I think it would do a lot of good to change the code of family law to something that's more practical. However, Matt Walsh wants you to get married now and worry about that later. That's a suicide mission. Mission denied.
Yes I am a fan of Matt Walsh but he’s seriously wrong after this marriage is hell in the west
Society is a Patriarchy, but it is Gynocentric. Everything is done for the comfort and convenience of women.
Correct, It’s a patriarchal-induced gynocracy where top males construe society to make it impossible for all other men to succeed and flourish in any way. Basically, non-ruling males today are abject slaves just like they were in antiquity. We have regressed back to the barbaric past where only the top male wins.
The Bruce Willis/Kim Bassinger movie 'Blind Date' has a restaurant scene where Kim's character blows up Bruce's career. It ends after Kim informs the very traditional Japanese businessman's wife about California divorce law. The wife suddenly can speak English and is very interested.
I'm an 80s child who saw that movie and thought it a dumpster fire. Even Willis wasn't into it.
Or the movie "Irreconcilable Differences" .
@@GoonSquadLifeMember And yet that scene is illustrative of how quickly non-American women adapt to the easy divorce laws in the US.
Marrying someone is like giving her your debit card, your pin number and giving her the power to take your to the cleaners:)
Absolutely change the divorce laws but activist judges will strike them down or reinterpret them to maintain the anti-male status quo as much as possible.
Its not just that a marriage might end in divorce and all the problems that come with that, its that its just not needed in our modern society. Everything you might want from marriage can be obtained without agreeing to a government contact.
it sounds awful to some but i like paying for sex, its cuts the bs out and I don't have to lie or pretend to like someone just to get it , so I agree
The whole reason as to why no-fault divorce came to exist is *because* wives would lie about abuse from their husbands because the wives wanted to be divorced.
I agree promiscuity is rampant, but I find it disgusting with men too. It’s odd to expect virgins to want the same men who won’t wait for sex though lol. Women who have low notch counts will likely want to wait to get to know a guy before they are ready for sex. She’s got a low notch count for a reason. Expectations are a little off on both sides.
You are so naive and misinformed.
Don't you know that it's only the top 10% ot to 15% of men who are sleeping with all the women.
Why do you think we call them Chads and Tyrones?
50% of men under 30 are celibate and virgins.
Most men can't get a woman to sleep with them even if their lives depended on or even if they wanted to.
And the ones have girlfriends to sleep with have to sweat their asses off to be given a chance to have them even look at them.
For women all they have to do is open a dating profile on tinder or IG with some revealing clothes and men will rain on them.
Or go to a bar or club with heels and some hot outfit and men are going to drool all over them.
For a man to get even 1/3 of that attention he needs to be incredibly rich or incredibly good looking, tall and have won the genetic lottery.
You clearly do not understand men's reality.
Women are the ones who are having sex with multiple top 10% dudes.
You are right ,promiscuous behavior is Rampant with guys ,as well as women🤔but this would not BE POSSIBLE if women did not encourage this and allow , " I am a strong ,independent Women ,etc " then these same women wonder why guys DO NOT want to marry them, won't sign a legally binding contract, where the husband is now Liable for his wife's credit, spending ,debt ,student loans ,etc.and DO not care if many guys now think MOST women are walking Headaches, bi polar emotional meltdowns, etc.....😳look at these so_ called speed dating events, only women show up,no men....? Please...there is a limit to to childish irresponsible behavior............and marriage is far past that LIMIT..becoming married is outright madness
Yea ok. For men we don’t get attached to our past pleasures. Women most definitely do. And that will be your Problem if you dare 🎉
The statistics are revealing though. People of faith are statistically less likely to divorce. My husband and I are practicing Catholics, our kids are in Catholic school, we take our faith seriously. But we also got married in our 30s so we both knew what we wanted and didn't see the point in wasting our time. The Catholic church is very clear about marriage and we had to go through marriage counseling before our wedding. The church develops men and their masculinity and emphasizes the complentary nature between men and women. ❤
“You’re not able to control HER…”
Weirdly missing the point. The part you control - YOU - is the part that has to choose a woman based on core values. The problem most people have is precisely that they don’t evaluate the health of what they’re attracted to. If you date garbage, you end up with garbage. You have 100% control who you date and marry. You have 100% control over disciplining yourself to understand core values and virtues, and how those values and virtues are expressed in a woman you find physically attractive. Statistically speaking, men are just as likely to be bad marriage partners as women, regardless of who initiates a divorce. But YOU have 100% control over whether YOU will honor the kinds of values and virtues that make a marriage last. If you do this, you will recognize what that looks like in a woman. If you don’t…if you marry whoever you happen to be attracted to (and for men, that’s any semi-attractive woman who “gets along” with them), then you’ll be at the mercy of your libido and your limbic system.
Saying you can’t control what a woman does is conceptually identical to saying you can’t control what alcohol does to your system. Umm…yes you can…it’s called de-prioritizing drinking and drunkenness. “I can’t help it, bruh, I was making good decisions but the alcohol had better ideas.” Moron, stop getting drunk. Have a glass and stop. Learn to appreciate life while you’re conscious. Pursue healthy activities with women and talk with her about more than trivialities and flirting.
Take some GOD DAMN responsibility for the KIND of person you’re dating. If you can’t tell who is virtuous and who isn’t…that’s YOUR character flaw. It’snot that women are indecipherable, it’s that you’re DUMB. FIX IT. You can fix it by deliberately living and thinking in a way that supports your values. Acquire and live the virtues you claim to prize. Architects have ZERO problem finding other architects. If you know how to design a house…you will have the ability to recognize when another person knows what you know.
This isn’t rocket science. If you practice and focus on objective virtue, you will readily identify it in other people. If you don’t…then you’ll be “shocked” when she “changes.” Stop being mindless. Learn the craft…and you will recognize when an attractive woman has learned the craft. Don’t learn the craft…and blame everyone but yourself.
I think Matt aims to make great points. What he misses is that he is a very wealthy, and influential man; so, he might have convinced himself that she’s with him for love, and values, etc. as they keep pumping out kids.. but would she stay with him if he lost his job/status? Hypergamy in action.
He’s always wrong about marriage, he hasn’t had to deal with the wrong woman yet.
With all the other “red pill” and “Manosphere” content out there, Rich always brings me back to center. Thanks Rich, you actually helped me weather my divorce.
Why'd you put them in quotes?
Daily Wire will conveniently ignore every word of this video and suggest that Rich is Andrew Tate's best friend since grade school.
But Rich is quite an extremist on this topic. He cites statistics but when he's taking a conclusion he's only assuming 100% divorce will happen and the woman is a hoe. I agree with many of his observations but his overall take is extreme
@djdoomy better to be extreme and be whole than chance it and not be. Seen so many women that are genuinely good women do a 180 for some strange reason, leaving the man scratching his head wondering what changed.
Thanks Rich. Too many of these men that are reliable in some areas of expertise will stray over into topics they have no business giving advice. Sometimes I don't 100% agree with your solutions, but that doesn't retract an ounce of the value of your content.
I'm purposefully married without delusion - but I come here because iron sharpens iron.
If you remove no-fault, have fun spending 100s of thousands in lawyer fees trying to prove fault in court. Just end alimony. End child support. Give default custody to the parent most able to support, or 50/50 if both qualify. If 50/50 custody isn't upheld, default goes 100% to the parent who invests. Make it a system of merit, not entitlement. Problem solved.
You must discern between active religion and passive. 90% of Christians are passive Christians; meaning they claim to be Christian but do not practice. This is common in all religions. A person who believes in God and the Last Day will not resort to divorce unless it's the only available option.
Oh there's no simple answer to a complex question, a complex answer is consisting of simple answer, abolishing no fault is one of those simple answer that is part of the complex solution.
Keeping a woman who hates you trapped with you is as logical as saying the way to deal with bee stings is to trap the bee in your bedroom.
i agree with all your points. thats the world we live in today
You've got to really, really, really, really, really promise not to get divorced. That will make the difference this time. Come on, man.
Write you own marriage contract and adopt the kids as they come out and see then 90% of woman will be perfectly good wife's forever. You just can't pay them to leave and give them when they need to not feel lonely, the kids.
Rich, this is one of the most informative video's you have ever done. thankyou
this guy brings up sime good points. but lets face it. he us just a salesman.
Here's a funny business idea for someone in the RP community. Open up a sportsbook on divorce for all these Christian men and celebs, including JP and Matt Walsh. Considering what Steven Crowder is going through, give me the over/under on Matt Walsh
This is genius!
Why not just debate Matt about this issue? That would be a good convo to watch
Yes, please do that!
It's not that they WILL ruin. It's the fact that they CAN
In the U.K we only recently legalised no fault divorce and marriage rates were still declining regardless.
Someone needs to moderate a debate between Rich and Matt.
Matt won't agree to a debate where he's not the moderator, and won't do it unless it's held in their studio so it can be edited into arbitrary sound bites.
@@AnamnesisTrue. Walsh cannot put himself in any position to diminish the Daily Wire brand and cash flow.
Agree. There are quite a few twenty-something incel-baiters on social media promoting end to no-fault divorce without understanding how it came about in the first place. Can’t force people to live together if either partner doesn’t want to.
You don't need to abolish "no fault divorce".
All you have to do is remove the prizes from filing for divorce without proof of fault.
To give a simple example: When you file for divorce, you are leaving your family.... *_not just leaving your spouse,_* so there's no question that the children, if any, are remaining with the parent that was filed against unless there is "proof of fault."
Stop treating marriage as simply a union between the two, and treat it as the creation of the family that it was always meant to be. If you abandon your family (divorce) without just cause, then you do so alone with only your personal effects.
I had a fault divorce, it was determined it was my fault! 🤪🤪
Yeah, no shit. You talk to any divorced woman and you’d think she got married against her will and was kept in a dungeon and treated terribly. Same story every time. When you meet her ex-husband, you think, this guy’s cool we should ditch this chick and get a drink.
If you have a penis, the court will find you at fault.
@@wilkinsnl yep isnt it amazing how its never their fault? Crazy
The Romans were perplexed that the ancient Germanic people actually practiced monogamous marriage. Polygamous marriage should also be legal. Any form of marriage is better for society than none. The legal system is stacked against healthy marriage and it should not be part of marriages, society and culture is more than just a legal system. Read Unwin's Sex and Culture Rich. Societies who are perverse and promiscuous are bound to be conquered by those with stricter control around sex.
Rich. It would be interesting to do one on the alternatives to being a father in this degenerate landscape if marriage isn't an option.
RICH is selling degeneracy, pessimism & promiscuity for men. #notgreat
High chances of also raising a degenerate. Destroying the family was the first step in creating mind controoled sheeps
The world has changed drastically in even the past 10 years.
The divorce rate for first time marriages over a 40 period is 69%
What country? Wherecis this stat found?
@@jays7318 'Divorce Statistics: Over 115 Studies, Facts and Rates for 2022'
Correction:
#17. Over a 40 year period, 67 percent of first marriages end
@@Arthur_King_of_the_Britons This is what I found: "Statistics show that in the United States, 50% percent of first-time marriages, 67% of second marriages, and 74% of third marriages end in divorce. "
Like most things, opposing views are crucial. People must choose their own path, and try to avoid acting on ignorance.
Preach the facts, Mr. Cooper.
Rich. Good video. Matt Walsh is right about a lot of things but I am with you on this one. Also, really looking forward to your next book.
Choose wisely. If you’re angry, begrudging, feel victimized, all I can say is you chose wrong. Get close to God, be accountable for choices you made, and try to square things up. Not saying it’s 100% anyone’s fault. Unfortunately for men, that means you need to start early and not do the body count thing. If you’re late to the game, the selection of high quality marriage partners diminishes dramatically.
Love the stand up break down idea. A lot of Bill Burr's stuff is so perfect for that.
Rich: an outstanding video!!
If you track individual marriages out over the course of time 75% of marriages end in divorce by year 10. The 50% is literally taking all marriages/all divorces. That’s a flawed mathematical argument.
@Truthseeker99991 coach Greg adams debunked Matt Walsh bullshit on his livestream and showed it. Not my fault you a gump ass hope strategist ninja lmao
The average marriage in the US last 8 years, so I can see that by year 10 it would go up considerably.
He got us, guys. At least you'll have 10 years with the person looking to leave you
Excellent video
i married a Xtian who was a virgin on our wedding night, her parents and both sets of grandparents were Xtians and married for 30+ years. 8 years later she filed for divorce claiming i was abusive. and all the Xtians around us clammed up and claimed they weren't judging all while i got eviscerated by the court system. this is a no-win situation for men, as the "manning up" is too late and youve already sinned, without any inspection of evidence. all to the tune of $250k, with no kids and both people working full time
I wanna see that comedy clip video!
The individual will always fall to the mob. That's where the individual ends.
If Matt has the misfortune to go through divorce, loses half or more of his wealth, loses access to his kids, loses his home, and pays a fortune in alimony and child support he may understand.
Then again, some guys go through this the first time, and go back for more, one, two or even more times with the same results.
Алень должен страдать.
matt walsh doesn't seem like a modern day incel to me. I think he would be happy he has given ilfe to 6 children even if it is at the expense of his happiness rather than live in fear and die having left nothing behind.
@@annasimons389 and I'm sure his wife isn't a 304 with high body count like you Annie. 😘 How's your OF doing these days?
@@zoomzoom3950 hit you where it hurts didn't it? You coward. Live in fear and having nothing left when you go. That's the life of a coward.
@zoomzoom3950 Maybe because Matt chose to marry a woman of virtue and vetted her out to be a genuine human being. He’s not going to marry a girl from the streets, he’s going to marry a family oriented women who is selfless over selfish. That is what men should be doing today, that’s what I’m doing today. However, I’m order to expect virtue from a woman YOU must be virtuous as the man. That’s our problem in todays society, no one’s taking accountability
Matt's Catholic, good for Matt, as a Catholic he supports the idea of his religious leaders being unmarried, from his local Priest to the Pope. He, Matt, needs to correct his religions problems first and then worry about complete strangers and what they choose for their lives. BTW .... Matt's another Steve Harvey, it's just a matter of time, not sorry.
Call the fire department, that was a scorcher.🔥😂
Well he isn't really giving biblical advice is one thing.
His entire video and post make it seem like willfully remaining single and avoiding marriage is somehow wrong or inherently sinful, when in reality the Bible says otherwise. There is nothing wrong with remaining single and in regards to the Bible, it is stated that a man can honor and glorify God even more so in singleness if he so chooses, and can still accomplish much alone. With that said, marriage is still a very beautiful and essential thing, but the solution cannot be rectified by simply telling men outside the faith to marry any random whore and hope it works. Instead there should be hope attached to those who are single and remain single by giving them a deeper purpose outside of marriage that we all have.
@11UncleBooker22 Good points you brought up; I was about to place a stand-alone comment about what you wrote. My 2 cents is this: men like Matt Walsh and Michael Knowles (hard-core Catholics), have been brought up with this notion that you have two basic vocations in life: Marriage or the priesthood; ther is no "third rail".
^^^^^^ This x 1,000. The NT assertion (primarily 1 Cor. 7) about singleness being a higher calling flies directly in the face of the OT, and its spin-off faiths that "require" a man to be married as to be a better steward of his household, etc. Even in the OT, celibacy was rampant because the tribal/territorial kings took all the marriageable women as wives and concubines, kinda like the 80/20 rule of dating we see today.@@someone-ji2zb
That’s a before and after sequence if I ever did see one.
Great video Rich.
Join The 1% Community Here: bit.ly/3rqzGpw
Join The Unplugged Alpha’s Guide to Divorce: bit.ly/3IjWjSC
Comment Your Thoughts Below 👇🏻
GET ON MY EMAIL LIST TO RECEIVE A FREE CHAPTER FROM MY BOOK: entrepreneursincars.com/red-flags/
GET MY BOOK - "The Unplugged Alpha, The No Bullshit Guide To Winning With Women & Life:" amzn.to/3fIVW3J
SUPPLEMENTS FOR MEN: theunpluggedalpha.com/collections/all-products
MY WEBSITE: www.richcooper.ca/
TACTICAL SOAP: Use code "COOPER" at checkout and Get 10% off Tactical Soap mentioned here: bit.ly/2jQEZbz
REQUEST A VIDEO TOPIC: entrepreneursincars.com/request
SUB MY MAIN CHANNEL: ruclips.net/user/EntrepreneursInCars
SUB MY TUA PODCAST CHANNEL: ruclips.net/user/TheUnpluggedAlpha
Valuable input Rich. The key is to disincentivize hurting the kids. So something like making the parents pack up their visiting bags to rotate residence and requiring 50/50 unless one or the other is locked up in jail under those rules of behind reasonable doubt not BS family court failure to pay nonsense... The ex also can't benefit from future improvement in the husband's situation since she already checked out... And support needs to be limited to halfway between what the government will give in welfare and half of the husband's ability to pay... So basically less than half of the current standards
Other than those drastic disincentives, it's going to keep spiraling downward with occasional sudden drop offs
Any plan can be a considered a success if the bar is low enough and a failure if it’s too high. They’re clearly saying you can minimize risk and you’re comparing it to a 100% success rate.
The stats are 50% on the conservative side. It’s likely around 75% after 10 years
I married a Christian woman. We both believed that divorce was wrong whole heartedly. She now is divorcing me and thinks God is perfectly fine with it. It all started once she got a white collar job surrounded by girl bosses. Modern women......even Christian ones...
Not sure how it relates to percentage but I read somewhere if she's a virgin the marriages last 20+ years.
8+ bodycount = 80% chance of divorce.
Amazing Eddie impression
😂
HALF!
Actually, like you said, Matt spoke about the individual vs the group. So, everything you said after your opening statement, doesn't argue against that.
7:17 Rich, you should do some on Patrice O'neal. he dropped gems back in the day.
The reason no fault will be abolished to to further advantage and protect women, make no mistake. It's mostly so that women can do what Rich says in this clip: make claims, true or not, and sue and win even MORE in the divorce settlement, or perhaps even have her ex imprisoned to get him out of the way.
Matt Walsh is insufferable when it comes to this issue. He speaks from a place of ignorance.
Bingo. He’s never had to deal with the dating market
Nah, he’s right about a lot of stuff. It’s just difficult with the governments involvement, that’s his only issue
In my experience women lead with their best foot and once the marriage papers are signed their true self comes out.
Gainfully employed, regularly exercising, productive etc
Turns into getting fired, alcoholism, weed smoking, viewing housework as “demeaning”
70 years ago single mothers were fairly common because men died young. My grandfather died at 34 in a car accident and left grandma with 4 kids. Dad died at 52 and left mom with 4 kids. Most of the single parent kids in my high school class of 1963 it was because the old man checked out early.
Yea but society back then used the term widow or widowed to distinguish them from actual single mothers.
Yeh but you have to realise the culture and ‘village’ could still raise the kid pretty well.. although the kids from WW2 where the ones in the hippy era so probably the fatherlessness caused that seeking of psychedelics..
Hes not wrong. Ur telling men to give up on the institution thats the foundation on which our society is built. Hes not wrong.
Cooper is mad because his lady dumped him. But he will tell you he's great😂
what is matt walsh's wifes body count?
It would be amazing if you got Esther Perel on the show