@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness that’s because it’s a Retcon it’s not scary at all. I don’t get any shivers when I read a book about it online or have any audiobooks about it it’s just not scary but generic and a little forced (in my opinion)
Dude, your editing is solid, and so is the voiceover. That said, your content isn't there. There are more holes in this than evidence to support it, and it really does read more as fan fiction than a theory that considers the content of fnaf canon.
I went and looked over this episode again. I may have rushed this one. I'm always trying to summarise my ideas due to the drop in audience attention (c/o Analytics). I'm also always aware of episode length and can't spend too much time on past episodes and ideas. I'll look into the next one before publishing.
I'm trying to use events and clues throughout the game and books for build my theories. Although it could be similar to when 'solved' gets thrown around; while just confusing the topic even more. It's the word that draws you in.
@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness It's kinda not cool if you only use theory to lure viewers while making up 60-70% of stuff without evidence for most of it m
70% !!! Every theorist needs to piece the clues together. I was hoping for closer to 30%. I am trying to decipher Scott's vision for the series; it's my use of books and games together that has me differing greatly from the community ideas.
@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness I'm gonna say, once you start attempting a story instead of connecting confirmed events in a chronological order. Most things start sounding like something Blackfootferret made, and I'll be surprised if most of his theories are serious.
More interesting than the mimic
The Mimic is scary thing that works great in a VR game, although Elizabeth has the better story.
@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness that’s because it’s a Retcon it’s not scary at all. I don’t get any shivers when I read a book about it online or have any audiobooks about it it’s just not scary but generic and a little forced (in my opinion)
Dude, your editing is solid, and so is the voiceover.
That said, your content isn't there. There are more holes in this than evidence to support it, and it really does read more as fan fiction than a theory that considers the content of fnaf canon.
I went and looked over this episode again. I may have rushed this one.
I'm always trying to summarise my ideas due to the drop in audience attention (c/o Analytics).
I'm also always aware of episode length and can't spend too much time on past episodes and ideas.
I'll look into the next one before publishing.
Are you a Queenslander? I don't take FNAF lore from Queenslanders.
A bit more to the South, Victoria. I read allot of books during those lockdowns.
@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness OK phew. So long as you're not from Queensland. *NSW REPRESENT!*
Why do so many fan fiction get titled theories on RUclips nowadays?🤔
I'm trying to use events and clues throughout the game and books for build my theories.
Although it could be similar to when 'solved' gets thrown around; while just confusing the topic even more.
It's the word that draws you in.
@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness It's kinda not cool if you only use theory to lure viewers while making up 60-70% of stuff without evidence for most of it m
70% !!! Every theorist needs to piece the clues together. I was hoping for closer to 30%. I am trying to decipher Scott's vision for the series; it's my use of books and games together that has me differing greatly from the community ideas.
@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness I'm gonna say, once you start attempting a story instead of connecting confirmed events in a chronological order. Most things start sounding like something Blackfootferret made, and I'll be surprised if most of his theories are serious.
@@echothesilent4693 ur fatherless.
you make conclusions without evidence
I think I'll make a part 2 and include more detail