Ain't this a full-circle situation? The fact that Kodak was the first to notice the secrecy of the Manhattan Project, and now being the medium of choice to shoot this epic film is just amazing. Props to Kodak and Nolan and their willingness to push the tech further.
The fact that Kodak filmed the original nuclear testings with Robert oppenheimer and after all these years they developed film for Imax for Oppenheimer movie is kinda super amazing, isn't it.
@@jimothy9943nearby? It was noticed in Rochester, NY. On the other side of the US. Main issue was the paper plants along the way there. Because Cesium got in the paper which was used to separate their X-ray film.
@@ruok3351 I agree. i thought that the new Batman movie was shot on film. Turned out it was all digital and they achieved the look with specific lenses and modifications.
@@ruok3351No, no digital camera can shoot at 4:3 aspect ratio and still have 18k resolution. Most importantly, the colors in Imax film are a lot richer than digital.
Nolan and Hoyte are two masters that have combined their powers to make the most mindblowing cinematic experiences we will ever get to witness. What a time to be alive.
Problem with digital is more the awful color grading it often has than the format itself. There are films and shows shot on digital that look awesome (most recent one I've seen that looks great is "The Bear, which is also a great show!) while others look awful (like the last Indiana Jones where they completely fucked up the color grading and everything is either yellow or blue). That said, I love how film looks, recently I've watched the remastered version of Heat and it's incredible, but digital sure has its place and allows filmaker to do things impossible with film cameras for a much lower cost.
@@jamesoloughlin I think the one I watched is the "Remastered Director's Definitive Edition". If you google for reviews you will find the best one anyway.
Filmed in a combination of IMAX 65mm and 65mm large-format film-including, for the first time, sections in IMAX black-and-white. And released in various film formats including IMAX 70 mm (30 prints), standard 70 mm (113 prints) and 35 mm (around 80 prints)
Went to see this in the only 70Mm cinema in my country! It looked lovely! Something I noticed though was the flicker in the highlights! My dad remarked that this is a feature of 35Mm and the reason why my grandad and people of earlier generations often referred to the cinema as “the flicks”! A nice little moment there!
This is very cool. Given Kodak's history, I am not surprised at their ability to adapt and create the 65mm BW film. I hope this medium survives. There is nothing as immersive as an image on film. Or glass. Those 19th century Daguerre's are some of the most realistic images in the world...because they are real! Same for film, it is as close to real as we have come.
@trevorriches136 ruclips.net/video/hIWp8TlmQLA/видео.html This says it was Ektachrome. Still awesome and great to see! A step in the right direction. Anyone know of any films, if any, shot on Kodachrome?
Actually, decades ago, Kodachrome was used for feature film production--but marketed/licensed as "Technicolor Monopak". Kodak had all rights for slide film Kodachrome, as well as 8mm and 16mm film stock. 35mm "low contrast" film stock (i.,e. Kodachrome Professional) was solely licensed to the Technicolor company. Technicolor 3-strip photography used cameras that were very complex and very huge. For scenes that could not accommodate the huge 3 strip cameras, low contrast Kodachrome was used instead as it could be used in any 35mm cone camera--even wind-up Eyemo cameras which were often used for newsreels! This "Technicolor Monopak" film was shipped to Kodak for processing, and the processed film was then optically printed to produce the RGB black and white "camera negatives" used in the conventional Technicolor process. Monopak was far grainier and inferior to 3 strip Technicolor, so Monopak was only used if it was absolutely essential. This was used from the 1940's until the industry switched to Eastmancolor negative film in the early 1950's. As a side nite, much of the footage in Walt Disney's "True Life Adventures" series was filmed in 16mm Kodachrome. The raw footage was then optically blown up to the Technicolor animation standard "Successive Exposure" method used for cartoon animation. This meant each frame of 16mm Kodachrome was photographed via optical printer onto black and white film three times--an exposure for red, blue, and green, in sequence. Technicolor would then treat this developed black and white film like any other animation photography. The advantage of this system was that the 16mm camera original was only handled once, and perfect registration for the 3 color records was achieved by exposing each primary color on the same reel of film.
Should encourage more filmmakers to shoot on film. Companies are now removing/modifying content from digital libraries. This should be demonized and the culprits responsible should be publicly ousted.
I thought Kodak doesn't exist anymore. 🙂 But it's nice that someone can still make a movie on such big analog format like 70 mm is, I saw it in IMAX Prague and digital would be totaly pixelated on such massive screen. But it's obvious that such crazy technology will not be a standard anymore, movie which has 18 km and 300 kg...there is no way that hollywood will accept that, let's how that digital format and projectors will improve soon, because 4K is really not enough for big screen. It's nice that you can see in this movie even those shots which are not 100% perfect where actor is slightly off focus when he moves just a few cm from point where he was supposed to be, you don't see such things in modern movies where they fill with higher depth of field and then blury background in postprocess or it's everything in front of green screen. PS: It's still still small, make big format film and projectors. 🤣🤣
The image quality when shooting in film is uncomparable. Watching old productions like 'In the heat of the night" or 'Godfather" can easily prove that.
They put in a lot more work to get the lighting/exposure right back then. There was a movie called Barry Lyndon that needed shots in rooms so dark they had to use lenses built for satellites.
Hey, Kodak crew, Is this 70mm BW film is just an enlarged DoubleX or something different? Thank you for your hard work, so sad your effort was not used completely by the crew.
I like IMAX 1570, but my shout out goes to Panavision's System 65 & those gorgeous Super Panavision lenses. The IMAX motor is too noisy to record dialog? Just fire up that smooth as silk 65mm 5 perf Panaflex and blow it up to 1570. Thanks Quentin Tarantino & Robert Richardson for reviving the Panavision System 65 cameras, Dan Sasaki for preserving & restoring the Ultra Panatar lenses, and to the 100 theaters that gambled on projected anamorphic 70mm film at 2.79:1. And cheers to Kodak for continuing to make 65mm color stock & the new brilliant 65mm black & white stock. Christopher Nolan & Hoyte Van Hoytema, keep making these amazing large format photochemical films.🥂
Yet now a lot of people can't enjoy watching the movie because they are sold out or people are selling them for 4x the price, which is ridiculous. I guess I'll have to wait till it comes out on digital
Sorry Nolan, but our eyes are a sensor in between film and CMOS digital but I think closer to the CMOS sensor. than film. Film is fun and beautiful but it is just clouds of chemical reactions. Beautiful movies though!. Oh wait. I forgot, movies are about stories and not the media...;_? I am lost...and always will be.
this advertisement should be the first advertisemnt if Kodak considers it as the promotion material .......... simply no noise because this advertisement is so LATE
Then shoot digital on a dated camera the commenters will complain. Whatever format ones see the movie on in the history of your life won't matter. "Asteroid City" being shot on film didn't make or break that movie. I saw it and have no desire to repeat the viewing. "Raising Arizona" I can watch over and over again.
to be honest, i watch this movie yesterday at IMAX cinema. But find it disappointing with the bombing scene only "just like that"? i can have better visualization in Discovery Channel or National Geographic or other in RUclips. it is to much exaggerate the Kodak 70mm feature in this movie, while 4/5 of all movie duration wasting on the discussion, court scene, and talking session. i must be honest, what for the IMAX or Kodak 70mm for this movie?
but last night I watch in theater in digital format,disaster picture for theater,I never return to digital theaters anymore. I have my super 8mm camera,is amazing but I cant use here in argentina for the cost of film.
@@Sidowse Yeah, I get how nukes work. But the platform and all the electronics and wires are always shown external to the device. I don't know if they just wrapped it in some metal to deploy it.
@@Sidowse I have to assume they thought of final assembly in the design, cause the demo bomb looked like sh.. What amazes me is, they got this 10,000 lb bomb down to a much lighter package in about 10 years. Eventual able to shoot one from a cannon with the same destructive power.
An Alexi camera and Zeiss lenses could have done the same thing. I'm not convinced film is the only way to get what we saw in Oppenheimer. It's all about the lens choice and cinematic camera movements.
The resolution of Alexi 65mm is 6K resolution, which is far lower than 65mm film. It's a reason why Nolan uses Kodak film to get closer to a 16-18K theoretical resolution of IMAX 65mm.
@@surfntrucksCureently, even if a camera can shoot 8k, it does not have a sensor the size compqrable to an Imax 70mm film. So, 18k resolution with the frame size of Imax 70mm is not even possible in the near future. And most importantly, the colors of film are always a lot better than digital.
Were any portions of this film shot on digital? I noticed some of the more visually mundane (feel horrible saying that because even these were so beautiful) scenes didn't have that same large format film density and unctuous feel.
Some was shot on IMAX 65mm and some on regular 65mm. Generally the IMAX shots were the establishing shots, scientific effects shots and most the Trinity sequence. It's really obvious when you see it in IMAX 70mm because the aspect ratio changes when the scenes cut (along with the resolution.)
Plasma TV together with Toshiba HD-TV disc is almost as good Emulsion film. But a 1080p plasma TV together with Toshiba HD-TV disc consume lots of electricity. Too bad it did not survive. I wished Sony should have bought Toshiba TV to use HD-TV as standard instead of the Bluish Blu-ray standard.
Are you looking for motion picture film stock or photographic film ? Kodak makes several 35mm film varieties. Porta 400, Gold 200, UltraMax 400, Tri-X 400, Ektar 100 and Porta 800 are some of the popular models
Ain't this a full-circle situation? The fact that Kodak was the first to notice the secrecy of the Manhattan Project, and now being the medium of choice to shoot this epic film is just amazing. Props to Kodak and Nolan and their willingness to push the tech further.
Agreed!
The fact that Kodak filmed the original nuclear testings with Robert oppenheimer and after all these years they developed film for Imax for Oppenheimer movie is kinda super amazing, isn't it.
it isn't
@@aktchungrabanio6467 who hurt you?
@@natevirtual who hurt YOU to feel hurt because of a dissenting comment? You're weak.
@@natevirtual It was me. I apologize for the trauma I caused him.
@@aktchungrabanio6467Clown shoes fit you perfectly
its really funny that Kodak and guy openheimer have a relationship IRL too
Kodak actually discovered that they were testing nukes in secret because the radiation was causing problems with their film at a plant nearby.
@@jimothy9943wow
@@jimothy9943 yeah that's what i was referencing in the original comment
@@jimothy9943nearby? It was noticed in Rochester, NY. On the other side of the US. Main issue was the paper plants along the way there. Because Cesium got in the paper which was used to separate their X-ray film.
@@jelleburmann7194 Nearby is a relative term. Unless you want to tell me you know the exact measurements of nearby.
Thank you Kodak for keeping film alive in this digital world 📽️🎥📸
Nolan maybe the only director who still insists on actually "filming" nowadays
@@hufranklin9925 There are a few. Scorsese, Spielberg, Chazelle, P. T. Anderson, Tarantino, Wes Anderson, Baumbach, etc.
Shame that theaters that still project film are all but non-existent these days.
I respect guys like Nolan who are trying to keep film alive.
Only guy
@@babayaga3241 definitely not the only guy
@v0ldy54 Nowadays true cinema is gone bro now everyone wants to become like MCU.
Denis Villenueve,Jordan Peele, Matt Reeves too @@babayaga3241
I agree film just looks so much better Great to see Kodak still working so hard with film industry
Lens choices are more important for the look more than anything. The organic look of film can be emulated.
@@ruok3351 I agree. i thought that the new Batman movie was shot on film. Turned out it was all digital and they achieved the look with specific lenses and modifications.
@@ruok3351No, no digital camera can shoot at 4:3 aspect ratio and still have 18k resolution. Most importantly, the colors in Imax film are a lot richer than digital.
Nolan and Hoyte are two masters that have combined their powers to make the most mindblowing cinematic experiences we will ever get to witness. What a time to be alive.
The kids will get a shock to see the organic natural nature of a film processed feature. Something these days that's becoming a lost artform
sooo sooo so beautiful and organic
hard to put into words but film properly done looks more real than real
a fellow cinematographer enjoying another legendary cinematographer
Let me tell you that the kids won't notice the difference
@@Skillseboy1 some wont. But the sensitive few will feel it and be encouraged to love cinema even more
I was lucky enough to see this on 70mm Max and I have to say it was truly magical. An experience non like I have ever had before
So happy Nolan (and others) are advocating so strongly for film. To be honest now-a-days film screenings gets me to a theater much more than DCP.
Problem with digital is more the awful color grading it often has than the format itself.
There are films and shows shot on digital that look awesome (most recent one I've seen that looks great is "The Bear, which is also a great show!) while others look awful (like the last Indiana Jones where they completely fucked up the color grading and everything is either yellow or blue).
That said, I love how film looks, recently I've watched the remastered version of Heat and it's incredible, but digital sure has its place and allows filmaker to do things impossible with film cameras for a much lower cost.
@@v0ldy54 remastered version of Heat?! is that the 4K blu ray release? Looking to get that (if it is good).
@@jamesoloughlin I think the one I watched is the "Remastered Director's Definitive Edition".
If you google for reviews you will find the best one anyway.
@@v0ldy54 thank you 🙏
Absolutely stunning.
Kodak is BACK in style 🤩
Saw it on 70mm IMAX. Incredible, awe-inspiring presentation...
Filmed in a combination of IMAX 65mm and 65mm large-format film-including, for the first time, sections in IMAX black-and-white. And released in various film formats including IMAX 70 mm (30 prints), standard 70 mm (113 prints) and 35 mm (around 80 prints)
Imax camera is the biggest and impressive camera that i’ve seen before,😳
True cinema should always be shot on film. But I wish IMAX 70mm theater was more easier to find too.
Keep film alive! this was stunning
Put out featurette showcasing how good Kodak film is. Uploads it only in 1080p. Which is also has it's HQ options paywalled. Good job.
Reminds me of the 1944 classic war movie set in the town of Chillingbourne. 🎥🎥🎥
Incredible. Thank you, Kodak.
Thank you Kodak.
I would give anything to get away from digital… I hope more directors take that direction lol
Thank you Kodak for your great work on this
Maybe dropping price for consumer film stock is a bless for all of us?
Take my damn money
Went to see this in the only 70Mm cinema in my country! It looked lovely! Something I noticed though was the flicker in the highlights! My dad remarked that this is a feature of 35Mm and the reason why my grandad and people of earlier generations often referred to the cinema as “the flicks”! A nice little moment there!
....so Murphy confirmed that was a real sandstorm on that scene........
well done kodak, welcome to the real world of film making
I loved the colors in this film! I really thought I was looking at some Kodachrome slides coming to life.
incredible
props to both kodak and film directors that still uses film to shoot their movie
This is very cool. Given Kodak's history, I am not surprised at their ability to adapt and create the 65mm BW film. I hope this medium survives. There is nothing as immersive as an image on film. Or glass. Those 19th century Daguerre's are some of the most realistic images in the world...because they are real! Same for film, it is as close to real as we have come.
65 min black and white ❤
Iconic crossover 🤝
#KeepFilmAlive #KeepPracticalSpecialVisualEffectsAlive
The Kodak legacy is insane!!
got to see this on 70mm and it looked incredible
Thanks to Kodak Vision 3 250D, 500T and Double X films.
Nice Roman Salute in the thumbnail o/
Love Kodak!!
Without Kodak, we may have never of known about them.
Amazing 😍
Nolan is a Master filmmaker
Excellent work! Glad to see yall still making an impact. P.s. bring back kodachrome.
Something interesting to note: Kodachrome was recently put into limited production exclusively for “Euphoria” Season 2!
@trevorriches136 ruclips.net/video/hIWp8TlmQLA/видео.html
This says it was Ektachrome. Still awesome and great to see! A step in the right direction. Anyone know of any films, if any, shot on Kodachrome?
@@trevorriches136that was ektachrome, kodachrome required k14 development which is long dead so it will almost certainly never be made again.
Actually, decades ago, Kodachrome was used for feature film production--but marketed/licensed as "Technicolor Monopak". Kodak had all rights for slide film Kodachrome, as well as 8mm and 16mm film stock. 35mm "low contrast" film stock (i.,e. Kodachrome Professional) was solely licensed to the Technicolor company. Technicolor 3-strip photography used cameras that were very complex and very huge. For scenes that could not accommodate the huge 3 strip cameras, low contrast Kodachrome was used instead as it could be used in any 35mm cone camera--even wind-up Eyemo cameras which were often used for newsreels! This "Technicolor Monopak" film was shipped to Kodak for processing, and the processed film was then optically printed to produce the RGB black and white "camera negatives" used in the conventional Technicolor process. Monopak was far grainier and inferior to 3 strip Technicolor, so Monopak was only used if it was absolutely essential. This was used from the 1940's until the industry switched to Eastmancolor negative film in the early 1950's. As a side nite, much of the footage in Walt Disney's "True Life Adventures" series was filmed in 16mm Kodachrome. The raw footage was then optically blown up to the Technicolor animation standard "Successive Exposure" method used for cartoon animation. This meant each frame of 16mm Kodachrome was photographed via optical printer onto black and white film three times--an exposure for red, blue, and green, in sequence. Technicolor would then treat this developed black and white film like any other animation photography. The advantage of this system was that the 16mm camera original was only handled once, and perfect registration for the 3 color records was achieved by exposing each primary color on the same reel of film.
I love Kodak! I am sure they would make a major comeback
Should encourage more filmmakers to shoot on film. Companies are now removing/modifying content from digital libraries. This should be demonized and the culprits responsible should be publicly ousted.
too expensive to shoot, edit and render.
Nolan's Hands in the thumbnail 🗿🙋
Everything was perfect Kodak but what Christopher nolan doing on thumbnail
Good that it's you... we all know & trust Kodak !
FUN FACT 🎥 🍿
IMAX WAS CREATED IN MISSISSAUGA ONTARIO CANADA 🇨🇦
&
I LIVE IN MISSISSAUGA ONTARIO CANADA 🇨🇦
Time to release that new b/w film
This is cool and all but it's kinda funny to see an ad for kodak there literally isn't any competition 😂
GIGACHAD kodak is back
Hey Kodak if you can step up and make large format film for Nolan, do you think you could step up and bring Kodak Gold prices down? thanks.
looks great
I thought Kodak doesn't exist anymore. 🙂 But it's nice that someone can still make a movie on such big analog format like 70 mm is, I saw it in IMAX Prague and digital would be totaly pixelated on such massive screen. But it's obvious that such crazy technology will not be a standard anymore, movie which has 18 km and 300 kg...there is no way that hollywood will accept that, let's how that digital format and projectors will improve soon, because 4K is really not enough for big screen.
It's nice that you can see in this movie even those shots which are not 100% perfect where actor is slightly off focus when he moves just a few cm from point where he was supposed to be, you don't see such things in modern movies where they fill with higher depth of field and then blury background in postprocess or it's everything in front of green screen.
PS: It's still still small, make big format film and projectors. 🤣🤣
The image quality when shooting in film is uncomparable. Watching old productions like 'In the heat of the night" or 'Godfather" can easily prove that.
They put in a lot more work to get the lighting/exposure right back then. There was a movie called Barry Lyndon that needed shots in rooms so dark they had to use lenses built for satellites.
@@rob_ya_boyRIP to John Alcott
Awesome
Hey, Kodak crew,
Is this 70mm BW film is just an enlarged DoubleX or something different?
Thank you for your hard work, so sad your effort was not used completely by the crew.
I hope Christopher Nolans next film calls for aerochrome so they'll start making it again
Nolan & Deakins should make a movie together.
Kodak-Great !!!🎥🎞🎬✌️😝🚀🚀🚀🥁🥁
Great idea ,sad moments ,Kodak the mother of films should comeback !!!!!🔴🫢🤫when I say Kodak it means quality,memories and that is priceless!!!!🤫
cool, now please make more portra please
new emulsion, cool!
Video is meant for TV and film is meant for films 🎞️
❤❤ it's all because of cillian
❤❤
Cool Cool Kodak! Now bring back Aerochrome to shoot on IMAX!
Kodak was the company who had found out that a nuclear test was done somewhere nearby
affordable medium format aerochrome 🤤
Anyone who doesn’t see this projected in 35 mm or 70mm is nuts.
All I can say is i don't like horror movies cos I don't belive in ghosts or afraid of 'em but this scared me..
This was a horror movie for me ☢️
I'd love to see more movies BW done on this film.
I like IMAX 1570, but my shout out goes to Panavision's System 65 & those gorgeous Super Panavision lenses. The IMAX motor is too noisy to record dialog? Just fire up that smooth as silk 65mm 5 perf Panaflex and blow it up to 1570.
Thanks Quentin Tarantino & Robert Richardson for reviving the Panavision System 65 cameras, Dan Sasaki for preserving & restoring the Ultra Panatar lenses, and to the 100 theaters that gambled on projected anamorphic 70mm film at 2.79:1.
And cheers to Kodak for continuing to make 65mm color stock & the new brilliant 65mm black & white stock.
Christopher Nolan & Hoyte Van Hoytema, keep making these amazing large format photochemical films.🥂
Double-X 5222 ... yeah Baby.
Yet now a lot of people can't enjoy watching the movie because they are sold out or people are selling them for 4x the price, which is ridiculous. I guess I'll have to wait till it comes out on digital
Should've filmed it on vhs
Sorry Nolan, but our eyes are a sensor in between film and CMOS digital but I think closer to the CMOS sensor. than film. Film is fun and beautiful but it is just clouds of chemical reactions. Beautiful movies though!. Oh wait. I forgot, movies are about stories and not the media...;_? I am lost...and always will be.
I hope that I NEVER have to shoot on digital, and let’s bring FILM to Wakaliwood! Peace.
Kodak, best pellicule for movie.
this advertisement should be the first advertisemnt if Kodak considers it as the promotion material .......... simply no noise because this advertisement is so LATE
How fitting 😂
good movie go see it. I still like interstellar and inception more tho for movies Nolan made
Ironic we are singing the praises of film while watching this digitally…
Then shoot digital on a dated camera the commenters will complain. Whatever format ones see the movie on in the history of your life won't matter. "Asteroid City" being shot on film didn't make or break that movie. I saw it and have no desire to repeat the viewing. "Raising Arizona" I can watch over and over again.
@@2148aa So no sense of humor then? Ok…
@pdcorlisnic Joke of the day::: What is made of leather and coughs??? Answer: A shoe. Took me 5 minutes to figure it out
There’s gotta be an app than let’s you watch reels of film 🎞️
to be honest, i watch this movie yesterday at IMAX cinema. But find it disappointing with the bombing scene only "just like that"? i can have better visualization in Discovery Channel or National Geographic or other in RUclips. it is to much exaggerate the Kodak 70mm feature in this movie, while 4/5 of all movie duration wasting on the discussion, court scene, and talking session. i must be honest, what for the IMAX or Kodak 70mm for this movie?
Best Camer
but last night I watch in theater in digital format,disaster picture for theater,I never return to digital theaters anymore.
I have my super 8mm camera,is amazing but I cant use here in argentina for the cost of film.
BRING BACK AEROCHROME FOR GRAINYDAYS
How did they get the plutonium bomb into a bomb? I mean look at all the wires used to set that thing off for a demo.
@@Sidowse Yeah, I get how nukes work. But the platform and all the electronics and wires are always shown external to the device. I don't know if they just wrapped it in some metal to deploy it.
@@Sidowse I have to assume they thought of final assembly in the design, cause the demo bomb looked like sh.. What amazes me is, they got this 10,000 lb bomb down to a much lighter package in about 10 years. Eventual able to shoot one from a cannon with the same destructive power.
@@Sidowse Higher enrichment, smaller amounts of plutonium, tampers, boosting, and better explosives would be my guess.
35 mm would take you only so far
🥰
btw oppenheimer doesn't have cgi
digital cameras look more similar to eyes, film looks more unique
An Alexi camera and Zeiss lenses could have done the same thing. I'm not convinced film is the only way to get what we saw in Oppenheimer. It's all about the lens choice and cinematic camera movements.
The resolution of Alexi 65mm is 6K resolution, which is far lower than 65mm film. It's a reason why Nolan uses Kodak film to get closer to a 16-18K theoretical resolution of IMAX 65mm.
IMAX 1570 is 16K resolution . You won't get that out of an Alexa 65 with Zeiss glass.
@@brightbluesmurf Is that right? 16k to 18k, interesting. I wonder who will be the first to create digital IMAX? RED, Alexa, Panavision?
@@surfntrucksCureently, even if a camera can shoot 8k, it does not have a sensor the size compqrable to an Imax 70mm film. So, 18k resolution with the frame size of Imax 70mm is not even possible in the near future. And most importantly, the colors of film are always a lot better than digital.
Were any portions of this film shot on digital? I noticed some of the more visually mundane (feel horrible saying that because even these were so beautiful) scenes didn't have that same large format film density and unctuous feel.
Some was shot on IMAX 65mm and some on regular 65mm. Generally the IMAX shots were the establishing shots, scientific effects shots and most the Trinity sequence. It's really obvious when you see it in IMAX 70mm because the aspect ratio changes when the scenes cut (along with the resolution.)
Plasma TV together with Toshiba HD-TV disc is almost as good Emulsion film. But a 1080p plasma TV together with Toshiba HD-TV disc consume lots of electricity. Too bad it did not survive. I wished Sony should have bought Toshiba TV to use HD-TV as standard instead of the Bluish Blu-ray standard.
Yes let's hope kodak can now actually make film for us normal folk who cannot even find 35mm available 🙃
Are you looking for motion picture film stock or photographic film ? Kodak makes several 35mm film varieties. Porta 400, Gold 200, UltraMax 400, Tri-X 400, Ektar 100 and Porta 800 are some of the popular models
how bout shoot on VHS next time. how would that look like
The ending of the movie hopefully will not come true in our lifetime.
They did a good job to uncover the truth to the world!!!
I am blessed cause I have seen many movies in "film". I feel pity for those who cant..!!