96% Muslims voted for partition of India but only 50% went across. The 46% who stayed back don't feel ashamed for being responsible for partition of India but think they did a favour to Hindus by staying back. Leaders like Gandhi and Nehru made the Hindus of India feel guilty about the sins of muslims who stayed back in India.
I always think that when partition happened why so many muslims are staying in india. Leaders would have agree that partition only happened if all muslims step out of court...see in pakisthan and bangladesh hindus population dropdown...and in india their population is increasing and they need reservations and scheems and waqf board and specail laws...what a gandu and nehru...khangress
Liaqat ali thru parliament banned muslim migration to pakistan from Dec 31 1951 This still in pakistan citizenship n nationality act 1951 Than in 1980. Zia canceled citizenship of bangldesh bihariz and granted citizenship to afghan By martial law regulations
Their commitment is towards their Allah to finish all the religions and they work accordingly only Hindus show their loyalty towards them and get cheated themselves or their community.
The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda published by The Ramakrishna Mission in English Hindi and other languages is a must for understanding the real history,culture and ethos of India. Without going through it you cannot write the true history of India. This should be included in the syllabus of school, college and university syllabus. Dr. Jain is right.
Very well said. Nehru was responsible for this mistake against the opinion of Baba saheb and Sardar Patel . This is responsible for the troubles we are facing today,compounded by the selfish Politicians. Very well said
@@AutomateTon Answer is clear cut! 1.Once they saw what kind of Pakistan it’s going to be many dropped idea of going to Islamic ELDORADO! Others were part of conspiracy , especially Aligarh crowd and clergy to stay put, make india Dareslam Muslim majority state. Rank and file stayed because state protected them from Hindu attacks or there were few Hindu attacks, didn’t match in scale. India country side Muslims were untouched! Where as Pakistan country side including Punjab and Loonghistan broke back of Hindus and Sikhs! Or it was not in nature of Hindus to reply in kind! These are the reasons! Even Jinnah thought he can peacefully retire in Bombay heaven in a big bungalow not far from sea!
The partition of India is not complete till population exchange is not completed. Jihaadis do not want CAA, NRC, UCC, PCC for this exact reasons and proclaim human rights.
Iramamurthy It is really funny that Muslims stayed back in India wanted one more partition and objecting of implementation of CAA,.NRC,.CCC, Thalak law, workship act, wakf board act. Tragedy on Hindus by anti India Congress party and their cohort Communist party who wants partition of India. India should be made Bharat Rashtra. Jai hind bharat Mata ki jai Vande matharam
@@ganapatinaik7834 Leftist lobby many of them who still control the system Remember the dialogue "Satta chahe kisi ke paas ho system hamara hain' from Kashmir files movie
Ambedkar only reiterated population exchange, but our leaders bastards ignored, only way now to save hindus separate electorates only only this method save hindus.
So, the partition happened on religious grounds, but even this is denied by colonised historians, as displayed by opposition to giving shelter to oppressed Sanatanis from neighbouring Islamic countries, and even worse, they champion the right of Muslims to come to BHARAT. We must answer: what right do Muslims (apart from asylum) have to come to BHARAT after this violent religious partition in1947? Even more importantly, for the future of BHARAT, does a secular Muslim exist, even if they state that "There is no God but Allah"? And if a secular Muslim exists, then where EXACTLY is the secular Muslim country, especially after the fall of Assad's Syria? Name ONE secular Muslim country from the 55 around the world. JAI BHARAT JAI BIHAR.
@@netaji-thebritishslayer Malaysia has Islam as the state religion, while "secular" Turkiye has just converted the biggest Christian Orthodox church Aya Sofiya into a museum. That leaves just Indonesia out of 55 to carry the secular torch. JAI BHARAT JAI BIHAR!
The woman is not telling history. She is telling propaganda. 'Section of society' did not demand partition. It was the Hindu Mahasabha and Muslim League that had ideas of nations on religious lines. Jinnah's 'Direct Action' was the cause of the riots during partition. Most of India's Muslims and Hindus went with the Congress and fought together for independence. Congress only accepted partition as working with the Muslim League was untenable.
To know their real stance... They always say we are wrong... Mock our gods and our other activities... By only potraying 500 year old history... Those idiots don't know honor of veer Vikram aditya they don't know wisdom of Budda. And many other kings. Why should we respect who killed looted our people.
The so called partition is a complete myth propogated India. India was always a subcontinet and never a country before 1947. There were many independent kindgoms in this subcontinent that had been fighting and conquering each other for mellenias just like in europe. Punjab was a country. Kashmir was a country. The actual partition happened in Punjab and Bengal. At the end of the British empire, two new large counteries came into existence, the erstwhile kingdoms and states were asked join to form these new counteries. One country called itself Pakistan, the other however conscripted the name of this subcontinent for itself and this is where the confusions lies. Imagine if a large country was created in Asia which then chose to call itself Asia, that would be absurd, but that is exactly what "India" did! Remember the very words India and Hindustan come from Sindh and river Indus, both of which are located in Pakistan. The land of Indus (Pakistan) gave India its name. Indus civilisation flourished along the Indus River in Punjab and Sindh. It doesn't belong to the current state called India. Their civilisation is in Ganga /jamuna. The descendants of Indus civilisation, Sindhis and Punjabis still live in Pakistan along the Indus River
Go and read the correct history not what has been taught in your schools by your Punjabi military dictators who twisted history to glorify themselves and dominate over different ethnicities in your country. Punjab and Kashmir were never ever countries. They were just geographical areas which were ruled at different times by different rulers. As far as Indus civilisation is concerned,it was not just confined to Punjab and Sindh, a large part of it is there in Indian States of Gujarat, Rajasthan and Haryana. Pakistani Punjabis have a tendency to dominate over other people by glorifying themselves.
Read correct history, Indica term was described by Megasthanes, and yes Bharatvarsh existed centuries before that Kashmir and Punjab as a country???? Have a reality check Population exchange during partition in Bengal was largely one sided wherein most Hindus were thrown out, the other community hardly moved Circumcision happens in Jews , they too are Abrahamics however they aren't brainwashed to the point of indulgence in T@qqia!!!
You mean the history they teach you in Nazi inspired RSS Shakhas! I never made any refrence to any religion in my previous message, yet your entire message is about religion. Perhaps you need to introspect your bigotry. Bharatvasrsa only refers to the western part of Gangetic valley. The very words India and Hindustan come from Sindh. Sindh predates India. 90 % of all sindhis are Pakistani citizens. Sindh and Punjab are the lands of Indus valley civilization. People of Pakistan are the descendants of that glorious civilization. Punjab was a kindgon which was dissolved by the British on the middle of the 19th century. Kashmir was a kingdom until 1947. That's the reason why all these independent kingdoms were asked to join up with either of the two new large counteries that emerged at the end of British Raaj. If India was always a country, why would there be any need to ask anyone to join it! India is unable to define it's identity without a direct reference to Sindh and Sindh has no such need. It has its own identity. I am a half Sindhi and half Punjabi. I look at India as my child ;)
@@aqeelkhurshid4860spot on..the Indian subcontinent had so many different countries for centuries. Mughals and then the British consolidated it for their own end. Its many diverse cultures with hundreds of different languages cultures and genetically different peoples and their different beliefs is living proof of it. Indian subcontinent is not one nation but many.
That's correct! What does a pashtun has in common with a keralan, what does a Punjabi has in common with a tamilian and what does a Kashmir has in common with an Assamese! Never forget this subcontinent is named after Sindh and river Indus. The current state called India is not the origin of the word india. Indians are living with an identity borrowed to them by Sindh. Sindh is a the father of this subcontinent. 90 % of all sindhis are Pakistani citizens 70 % of all Punjabis are Pakistani citizens. In conclusion the people of Pakistan are the daddy of this subcontinent
The so called partition is a complete myth propogated India. India was always a subcontinet and never a country before 1947. There were many independent kindgoms in this subcontinent that had been fighting and conquering each other for mellenias just like in europe. Punjab was a country. Kashmir was a country. The actual partition happened in Punjab and Bengal. At the end of the British empire, two new large counteries came into existence, the erstwhile kingdoms and states were asked join to form these new counteries. One country called itself Pakistan, the other however conscripted the name of this subcontinent for itself and this is where the confusions lies. Imagine if a large country was created in Asia which then chose to call itself Asia, that would be absurd, but that is exactly what "India" did! Remember the very words India and Hindustan come from Sindh and river Indus, both of which are located in Pakistan. The land of Indus (Pakistan) gave India its name. Indus civilisation flourished along the Indus River in Punjab and Sindh. It doesn't belong to the current state called India. Their civilisation is in Ganga /jamuna. The descendants of Indus civilisation, Sindhis and Punjabis still live in Pakistan along the Indus River
Contrary to your opinion, a modern nation State is western concept, and colonial India was created by the British, yeh it's true if there was no modern nation State before consolidation, but there was the concept of Arya varta ( real name) people from West popularize as Hindustan ( the term Hindu came from Indus indeed ) which is broadly geographic term, and the religion the people of subcontinent followed was Sanatan Dharm. From ancient times Samrat Ashoka to Samundra Gupta had successfully got small capitals into larger ones. The problem with many muslims is the civilizational ethos , you follow the Abrahamic religion and we follow the belief of this land, even in Sanatani many beliefs in one God, and some sections don't even follow God just Karma. The most pathetic case is that mutual respect, not annihilation. A mediaeval tyrant in the name of Islam wipes out Iran's Jorastrians, Egypt's old religion...but only in India they can't.But in 1947 this is well established in modern history India was a country because of 200 years of colonization, that's why India have common ethos.
@@aqeelkhurshid4860 Partition as myth is as good as a big mouthful of lie mind it the Direct Action Day was initiated by leaders of a certain community, Hindus/Sikhs never started it
You are right, what is India today as a state was created by the Brits. Arya varta only refers to an area in the north of India, not whole of it. Bharat only refers to the western part of Gangetic valley. The real origin of this subcontinent is Sindh. Indus valley civilization predates all religions present in this subcontinent today. The heart of this civilization is Sindh and Punjab. There was no concept of one identity in this subcontinent. Pashtuns which make up around 20 % of Pakistan's population have almost nothing in common with people of Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Assam, Sikkim and many other areas of present day India. Their languages are mutually unintelligible, their attire, music, literature, folklores and legends, their poetry are all different. They even look drastically different. I could say the same thing about Punjabis, Kashmir and other ethnicities in Pakistan as compared to ethnicities in India. Ashoka and Gupta did not "merge' areas. That's a convenient euphemism. Ashoka and Gupta created empires via unimaginable atrocities. All empires are brought about through conquest and violence, be it the Mughals, Brits, Arabs or any other blood thirsty ambitious war monger. It surprises me that people so eagerly appose diversity and seem so determined to foist a mono identity on others. As a pakistani I've no trouble recognising that people from Maharashtra or Andhra Pradesh may have many things in their culture and customs drastically different to mine. It doesn't bother me in the slightest. If anything it makes me curious about their culture and I wish them all the best
@@aqeelkhurshid4860 good prospective, actually people that matters, as long as people celebrate their own belief without destroy social ethos. Hinduism has never been a monoisthic thought process and we accept another person's perspective. Just wish the other side will regard the same.
Thank you for your compliment. I think in time, probably a few generations from now or a bit longer, religion will become irrelevant in social life and become purely a personal matter, as it should. Those counteries that are most diverse, respect civil liberties and practice true free speech will become the most prosperous. There is no one version of history, there are some facts but a lot of events can be interpreted in many ways. Noone has the final word on any subject. If Europeans who had fought each other for centuries and commited untold massacres amongst themselves can free themselves of the past and become a successful continent that it is today, then surely India, Pakistan and other home nations can resolve their issues too
96% Muslims voted for partition of India but only 50% went across. The 46% who stayed back don't feel ashamed for being responsible for partition of India but think they did a favour to Hindus by staying back. Leaders like Gandhi and Nehru made the Hindus of India feel guilty about the sins of muslims who stayed back in India.
I totally agree with you
I always think that when partition happened why so many muslims are staying in india. Leaders would have agree that partition only happened if all muslims step out of court...see in pakisthan and bangladesh hindus population dropdown...and in india their population is increasing and they need reservations and scheems and waqf board and specail laws...what a gandu and nehru...khangress
Liaqat ali thru parliament banned muslim migration to pakistan from Dec 31 1951
This still in pakistan citizenship n nationality act 1951
Than in 1980. Zia canceled citizenship of bangldesh bihariz and granted citizenship to afghan
By martial law regulations
A SHAME ?? THATS THE STRATEGY OF MOSLEMS FACTS SEE TODAYS MOSLEMS DOMINATES
Their commitment is towards their Allah to finish all the religions and they work accordingly only Hindus show their loyalty towards them and get cheated themselves or their community.
Maulana let slip once: "We will accept Pakistan.. FOR NOW." Some stayed because they wanted Pak immediately AND India in future.
@@NpsI2050 Which Maulana?
Which molana
The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda published by The Ramakrishna Mission in English Hindi and other languages is a must for understanding the real history,culture and ethos of India. Without going through it you cannot write the true history of India. This should be included in the syllabus of school, college and university syllabus. Dr. Jain is right.
Very well said. Nehru was responsible for this mistake against the opinion of Baba saheb and Sardar Patel . This is responsible for the troubles we are facing today,compounded by the selfish Politicians. Very well said
Nehru was thankful to British and Islamist for the power he got he considered Indians as slaves and petty thieves begging for bakshish before Brits
But that still don't answer why they didn't leave.
Bharati is a better place than their wasted deserted homeland
For creation of Ghazwa-E-Hind.
@@AutomateTon Answer is clear cut! 1.Once they saw what kind of Pakistan it’s going to be many dropped idea of going to Islamic ELDORADO! Others were part of conspiracy , especially Aligarh crowd and clergy to stay put, make india Dareslam Muslim majority state. Rank and file stayed because state protected them from Hindu attacks or there were few Hindu attacks, didn’t match in scale. India country side Muslims were untouched! Where as Pakistan country side including Punjab and Loonghistan broke back of Hindus and Sikhs! Or it was not in nature of Hindus to reply in kind! These are the reasons! Even Jinnah thought he can peacefully retire in Bombay heaven in a big bungalow not far from sea!
THEY ARE SMART BRAVES AND UNITED TO FOOLS THE HINDUS WHO ARE FOOLISH IDIOTS
@@peachNpink really??did u take some sort of survey??
The partition of India is not complete till population exchange is not completed. Jihaadis do not want CAA, NRC, UCC, PCC for this exact reasons and proclaim human rights.
Smt Meenakshi Jain is real historian and gem in history field.
Iramamurthy
It is really funny that Muslims stayed back in India wanted one more partition and objecting of implementation of CAA,.NRC,.CCC, Thalak law, workship act, wakf board act. Tragedy on Hindus by anti India Congress party and their cohort Communist party who wants partition of India. India should be made Bharat Rashtra.
Jai hind bharat Mata ki jai Vande matharam
What is stopping current BJP government in centre from giving the correct version of Indian history?
@@ganapatinaik7834 Leftist lobby many of them who still control the system
Remember the dialogue "Satta chahe kisi ke paas ho system hamara hain' from Kashmir files movie
The whole left liberal deep state is still intact. The daily controversies, the bogus agitations etc. Suprised you can't see these happenings.
Ambedkar only reiterated population exchange, but our leaders bastards ignored, only way now to save hindus separate electorates only only this method save hindus.
those who stayed back just to demand one more partition is this secret?
Thank you Meenakshi jiii
So, whose fault is this that they didn’t leave this land ? Theirs or ours?
They were risk averse.
Truth said..thanks for bringing it out to light
Finish the partition. Soon. 40 crores already.
So, the partition happened on religious grounds, but even this is denied by colonised historians, as displayed by opposition to giving shelter to oppressed Sanatanis from neighbouring Islamic countries, and even worse, they champion the right of Muslims to come to BHARAT. We must answer: what right do Muslims (apart from asylum) have to come to BHARAT after this violent religious partition in1947? Even more importantly, for the future of BHARAT, does a secular Muslim exist, even if they state that "There is no God but Allah"? And if a secular Muslim exists, then where EXACTLY is the secular Muslim country, especially after the fall of Assad's Syria? Name ONE secular Muslim country from the 55 around the world. JAI BHARAT JAI BIHAR.
indonesia,malaysia??turkey??
@@netaji-thebritishslayer Malaysia has Islam as the state religion, while "secular" Turkiye has just converted the biggest Christian Orthodox church Aya Sofiya into a museum. That leaves just Indonesia out of 55 to carry the secular torch. JAI BHARAT JAI BIHAR!
whose mistake was that?
Wait few more years .1947 will repeat.Thanks to hindu seculars.
Gandhi , Nehru , Congressman & Communists are responsible .
The woman is not telling history. She is telling propaganda. 'Section of society' did not demand partition. It was the Hindu Mahasabha and Muslim League that had ideas of nations on religious lines. Jinnah's 'Direct Action' was the cause of the riots during partition.
Most of India's Muslims and Hindus went with the Congress and fought together for independence. Congress only accepted partition as working with the Muslim League was untenable.
Akhand Hindu Bharat is the only solution
Why this dirty old stories???
To save India from dirty politics , the country will face it in future .
To prevent probable dirty that may again happen on Hindusthan
To know their real stance... They always say we are wrong... Mock our gods and our other activities... By only potraying 500 year old history... Those idiots don't know honor of veer Vikram aditya they don't know wisdom of Budda. And many other kings. Why should we respect who killed looted our people.
Yr nehru ko akal bhi nhi ayi ki agar phirse koi jinnah khda ho gya phirse dekh ke tukde honge uper se kashmir wala msla bhi bich me atka diya un jakar
The so called partition is a complete myth propogated India.
India was always a subcontinet and never a country before 1947. There were many independent kindgoms in this subcontinent that had been fighting and conquering each other for mellenias just like in europe. Punjab was a country. Kashmir was a country.
The actual partition happened in Punjab and Bengal.
At the end of the British empire, two new large counteries came into existence, the erstwhile kingdoms and states were asked join to form these new counteries. One country called itself Pakistan, the other however conscripted the name of this subcontinent for itself and this is where the confusions lies. Imagine if a large country was created in Asia which then chose to call itself Asia, that would be absurd, but that is exactly what "India" did! Remember the very words India and Hindustan come from Sindh and river Indus, both of which are located in Pakistan. The land of Indus (Pakistan) gave India its name.
Indus civilisation flourished along the Indus River in Punjab and Sindh. It doesn't belong to the current state called India. Their civilisation is in Ganga /jamuna. The descendants of Indus civilisation, Sindhis and Punjabis still live in Pakistan along the Indus River
Go and read the correct history not what has been taught in your schools by your Punjabi military dictators who twisted history to glorify themselves and dominate over different ethnicities in your country. Punjab and Kashmir were never ever countries. They were just geographical areas which were ruled at different times by different rulers. As far as Indus civilisation is concerned,it was not just confined to Punjab and Sindh, a large part of it is there in Indian States of Gujarat, Rajasthan and Haryana. Pakistani Punjabis have a tendency to dominate over other people by glorifying themselves.
Read correct history, Indica term was described by Megasthanes, and yes Bharatvarsh existed centuries before that
Kashmir and Punjab as a country???? Have a reality check
Population exchange during partition in Bengal was largely one sided wherein most Hindus were thrown out, the other community hardly moved
Circumcision happens in Jews , they too are Abrahamics however they aren't brainwashed to the point of indulgence in T@qqia!!!
You mean the history they teach you in Nazi inspired RSS Shakhas!
I never made any refrence to any religion in my previous message, yet your entire message is about religion. Perhaps you need to introspect your bigotry.
Bharatvasrsa only refers to the western part of Gangetic valley.
The very words India and Hindustan come from Sindh.
Sindh predates India. 90 % of all sindhis are Pakistani citizens.
Sindh and Punjab are the lands of Indus valley civilization. People of Pakistan are the descendants of that glorious civilization.
Punjab was a kindgon which was dissolved by the British on the middle of the 19th century. Kashmir was a kingdom until 1947.
That's the reason why all these independent kingdoms were asked to join up with either of the two new large counteries that emerged at the end of British Raaj.
If India was always a country, why would there be any need to ask anyone to join it!
India is unable to define it's identity without a direct reference to Sindh and Sindh has no such need. It has its own identity. I am a half Sindhi and half Punjabi. I look at India as my child ;)
@@aqeelkhurshid4860spot on..the Indian subcontinent had so many different countries for centuries. Mughals and then the British consolidated it for their own end. Its many diverse cultures with hundreds of different languages cultures and genetically different peoples and their different beliefs is living proof of it. Indian subcontinent is not one nation but many.
That's correct!
What does a pashtun has in common with a keralan, what does a Punjabi has in common with a tamilian and what does a Kashmir has in common with an Assamese!
Never forget this subcontinent is named after Sindh and river Indus. The current state called India is not the origin of the word india.
Indians are living with an identity borrowed to them by Sindh.
Sindh is a the father of this subcontinent.
90 % of all sindhis are Pakistani citizens
70 % of all Punjabis are Pakistani citizens.
In conclusion the people of Pakistan are the daddy of this subcontinent
The so called partition is a complete myth propogated India.
India was always a subcontinet and never a country before 1947. There were many independent kindgoms in this subcontinent that had been fighting and conquering each other for mellenias just like in europe. Punjab was a country. Kashmir was a country.
The actual partition happened in Punjab and Bengal.
At the end of the British empire, two new large counteries came into existence, the erstwhile kingdoms and states were asked join to form these new counteries. One country called itself Pakistan, the other however conscripted the name of this subcontinent for itself and this is where the confusions lies. Imagine if a large country was created in Asia which then chose to call itself Asia, that would be absurd, but that is exactly what "India" did! Remember the very words India and Hindustan come from Sindh and river Indus, both of which are located in Pakistan. The land of Indus (Pakistan) gave India its name.
Indus civilisation flourished along the Indus River in Punjab and Sindh. It doesn't belong to the current state called India. Their civilisation is in Ganga /jamuna. The descendants of Indus civilisation, Sindhis and Punjabis still live in Pakistan along the Indus River
Contrary to your opinion, a modern nation State is western concept, and colonial India was created by the British, yeh it's true if there was no modern nation State before consolidation, but there was the concept of Arya varta ( real name) people from West popularize as Hindustan ( the term Hindu came from Indus indeed ) which is broadly geographic term, and the religion the people of subcontinent followed was Sanatan Dharm. From ancient times Samrat Ashoka to Samundra Gupta had successfully got small capitals into larger ones. The problem with many muslims is the civilizational ethos , you follow the Abrahamic religion and we follow the belief of this land, even in Sanatani many beliefs in one God, and some sections don't even follow God just Karma. The most pathetic case is that mutual respect, not annihilation. A mediaeval tyrant in the name of Islam wipes out Iran's Jorastrians, Egypt's old religion...but only in India they can't.But in 1947 this is well established in modern history India was a country because of 200 years of colonization, that's why India have common ethos.
@@aqeelkhurshid4860 Partition as myth is as good as a big mouthful of lie mind it the Direct Action Day was initiated by leaders of a certain community, Hindus/Sikhs never started it
You are right, what is India today as a state was created by the Brits.
Arya varta only refers to an area in the north of India, not whole of it. Bharat only refers to the western part of Gangetic valley.
The real origin of this subcontinent is Sindh.
Indus valley civilization predates all religions present in this subcontinent today. The heart of this civilization is Sindh and Punjab.
There was no concept of one identity in this subcontinent. Pashtuns which make up around 20 % of Pakistan's population have almost nothing in common with people of Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Assam, Sikkim and many other areas of present day India. Their languages are mutually unintelligible, their attire, music, literature, folklores and legends, their poetry are all different. They even look drastically different. I could say the same thing about Punjabis, Kashmir and other ethnicities in Pakistan as compared to ethnicities in India.
Ashoka and Gupta did not "merge' areas. That's a convenient euphemism. Ashoka and Gupta created empires via unimaginable atrocities. All empires are brought about through conquest and violence, be it the Mughals, Brits, Arabs or any other blood thirsty ambitious war monger.
It surprises me that people so eagerly appose diversity and seem so determined to foist a mono identity on others.
As a pakistani I've no trouble recognising that people from Maharashtra or Andhra Pradesh may have many things in their culture and customs drastically different to mine. It doesn't bother me in the slightest. If anything it makes me curious about their culture and I wish them all the best
@@aqeelkhurshid4860 good prospective, actually people that matters, as long as people celebrate their own belief without destroy social ethos. Hinduism has never been a monoisthic thought process and we accept another person's perspective. Just wish the other side will regard the same.
Thank you for your compliment. I think in time, probably a few generations from now or a bit longer, religion will become irrelevant in social life and become purely a personal matter, as it should.
Those counteries that are most diverse, respect civil liberties and practice true free speech will become the most prosperous.
There is no one version of history, there are some facts but a lot of events can be interpreted in many ways. Noone has the final word on any subject.
If Europeans who had fought each other for centuries and commited untold massacres amongst themselves can free themselves of the past and become a successful continent that it is today, then surely India, Pakistan and other home nations can resolve their issues too