I pilot a self-driving truck. Here’s why we need more.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 авг 2023
- 96% of road accidents are caused by human error. Could self-driving semi trucks be a safer option?
Up Next ► Inside the Auto Repair Shops of the Electric Age • Inside the Auto Repair...
Subscribe to Freethink on RUclips ► freeth.ink/youtube-subscribe
Embark, a pioneer in the autonomous vehicle industry, is on a mission to transform long-haul trucking by integrating self-driving technology into the sector.
It's a project that aims to address the pressing issue of labor shortages, as well as enhance road safety and improve truckers' quality of life. Beverly Morrison, a professional trucker and a safety driver for one of Embark's autonomous trucks, plays a crucial role in refining this technology, providing valuable feedback from her first-hand experience.
The potential of self-driving trucks goes beyond safety; they could drastically cut operational costs, streamline long-haul trips, and offer more efficient fuel consumption. Although automation may eventually take over much of long-haul trucking, human drivers remain indispensable, especially for intricate urban routes and local deliveries.
Watch on Freethink.com ► Watch on Freethink.com ► www.freethink.com/sponsored/e...
This video was made in partnership with @MillionStoriesMedia
◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠
Read more of our stories on reinventing transportation:
Autonomous public transportation rolls out in Arizona
► www.freethink.com/transportat...
World’s largest electric cargo plane can carry up to 400 pounds
► www.freethink.com/transportat...
You can ride this “flying” electric ferry in 2023
► www.freethink.com/energy/elec...
◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡
Watch our original series:
► Hard Reset: • Hard Reset by Freethink
► Just Might Work: • Just Might Work by Fre...
► Challengers: • Challengers by Freethink
◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠◠
About Freethink
No politics, no gossip, no cynics. At Freethink, we believe the daily news should inspire people to build a better world. While most media is fueled by toxic politics and negativity, we focus on solutions: the smartest people, the biggest ideas, and the most ground breaking technology shaping our future.
◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡◡
Enjoy Freethink on your favorite platforms:
► Daily editorial features: www.freethink.com/?...
► Solutions-based stories, straight to your inbox: www.freethink.com/subscribe/?...
► Facebook: / freethinkmedia
► Instagram: / freethink
► Twitter: / freethinkmedia
► Join the Freethink forum: / freethinkforum
![NoCap - Maliboo [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FUV7E0QyniU/mqdefault.jpg)
Always the new tech is tested in ideal weather. That's the easy part. Let's see it operate in the same horrible weather that everyone else has to drive in. Especially snow where you cannot even see the markings on the road.
kind of strange how this videos tries to celebrate her "new job" while at the same time makes it abundantly clear that it is a temporary niche thing that is going get phased out sooner rather than later.
Perhaps you are correct, but I also think people like the idea of a human behind the machine in case something goes wrong. So even if it’s just for show and monitoring the autopilot system, there will probably always be a human involved in the process. If for nothing else, just to make people feel safer around this new tech.
@@Gobbldeegoo1 hm yeah, but unfortunately "people like the idea" does not have the slightest chance VS. "higher profit margins" under our economic system.
then why do we still have pilots for airplanes? it's practically smooth sailing once in the air, but human intervention will be needed during turbulence that a self-flying plane won't be able to correct itself over a few milliseconds, and even if we're able to perfect AI to not require further human input, we, as humans, are inherently flawed making flawed machines (ever heard of the term "garbage in, garbage out" in computer programming?) and success is usually based on luck: being at the right time and the right place with the right external circumstances.
@@Echo81Rumple83 from a business standpoint the sole reason money it put into furthering this technology is literally to no longer have to pay drivers so ... 😅
Kind of strange that you instantly assume she will be forever unemployed when she has the experience to do other jobs within the company such as a safety inspector, or even a trainer for new recruits. Just like how 1 truck does the work of 9 strong ass horses, her jobs will just be REPLACED by other jobs. There's software engineering and debugging, there's the mechanics needed for repair, there's the safety inspectors, there's the R&D team that specifically improves upon what's already there. Jobs will never go away, they will just be replaced. The most common way is that it free up more people to do OTHER jobs thereby increasing production for products considered WAAY too expensive now. All cost is labour.. gold is worthless if we could mine a gold filled asteroid as easily as we walk to the grocery store.
"Pilots" are just to offset liability, when the self-driving system fails and damages property or hurts people, the liability is put on the "pilot"
Yup they will always have a human in the cab to do the jail time when it kills someone
The driver will always have to be there no matter how well it drives. Driving is random, while the computer may help, it on its own will never be good enough. and there is so much more to driving truck than driving. Still need to do pre trip inspections, and pull over to do in trip inspections. Make sure the trailer is balanced with the freight, as well as guard the freight, refuel, and so on. When driving you need to listen to noises, and be aware of smells that can indicate a mechanical problem. Sometimes the truck just dies on its own for no reason, hence needing the driver there to watch over the cargo, and pull the truck over safely. Backing Trucks is where most of trucks get into accidents. What about putting chains on the tires? Is it even legal to do so in that state? I can see self driving trucks as being a helper, but not replacement.
With the amount of money thrown at self driving tech by so many different companies and start-ups, the US could have developed a completely new system of guidance and communication for self driving vehicles or even just expanded the rail system.
But that's the problem when innovation is solely in private hands, nobody wants to agree on a standard that would work across company lines because every company wants to be the one to do it differently than the others.
Expanded rail system for commerce, and public transportation.
you speak nonsense.
She'll be out of a job in no time.
Assistive driving is well and good. But the real gamechanger is much less sexy. Just make the trailer part actively controllable if required, then manuevering tight spaces and dropping off cargo will become 50times easier.
Interesting but sadly it won't be of much use in Canada. Looking at the cameras and sensors, here they would be coated with salt mist/dirt/ice/snow and rendered useless in our 8 months of winter. Plus roads here are often snow/ice covered so lines are hidden. Signs also are often coated in ice and snow. It's a brutal climate with -45C most days.
Can it park itself at the destination/warehouse?
Guessing this was produced before embark went under?
A self driving semi hit a vehicle. The driver sued the company that made the self driving technology and now that company is out of 8.5 billion dollars. So truckers don't have to worry about losing their jobs. But the engineers of the self-driving trucks do
❤❤❤😊very good autonomus drive pilot for help people drive truks
i'm a trucker i will gladly pilot those i'm tired of driving but not like i can go jump in sleeper as truck drives
You can drink all the booze you want
So you going to sit in a seat for 10 hours watching the road? that sounds really boring 😂
There is probably enough driver just not enough ways to connect each other so that we can sort of cross dock trailers , the money is not there when you are willing to share and not enough trust between drivers. Also when pandemic hit government was quick on lowering gas mean while diesel stayed expensive for quite awhile
Here recently a big trucking company who has invested in this technology with two pilots had a deadly crash resulted in the death of nine people. A major lawsuit is in the process meanwhile all auto driving trucks have been removed for service .
What part of the country
@@joan5150A better question is probably what country...
Where has this occurred and what company please? I’d like to read more about it.
A claim such as that, with no references, is useless & probably total BS.
Amazing to be involved in the future where the roads are safer for everyone.
You are one of the few positive voices on here. I am in the AI community and agree with you, but not everyone sees it the same way. (shameless request for subscription on the channel if you actually think that way, we would love to have you.)
So your helping put yourself out of work. The article said ‘human drivers are here to stay for the short term’. That is a contradiction of terms! Here to stay/short term? It’s one or the other not both.
Well the California Board of Transportation pass new laws saying that a human has to be behind a self-driving semi truck at all times. They're not letting 800 lbs go down the highway without a human
They said that these are the 'jobs of the future'. That is like an accountant helping to install a computer that will replace his job and thousands of other accountant jobs like his, and he says "these are the jobs of the future", to which he understands he will be permanently unemployed in a few days once the installation is complete. That is not the 'job of the future', that is the job right now, and the future is unemployment.
In my video over @theassclowncircus I stated as much. I think the jobs that are safety critical and require Hazmat will the be the most secure.
Sooo coooooool!!!! 🙌🙌🙌
Every kiosk you use...every app is a training model 😅 too bad no one sees a discount
I like how San Francisco had to shut down their driverless taxis because another accident happened and it hit a pedestrian and drug them even though they were screaming.
Until a corporation can be charged with manslaughter, fully autonomous vehicles have no business being on the road without a safety driver.
Automated driving works ok until you get into a "corner case" then it fails
Nice cover story, but that's not autonomous but driver assistance. The funny thing is that the goal is to put more control into the hands of the few and remove truck drivers having a say. Ever since what went down in Canada the concerted effort to remove people has been nonstop. Thats not even mentioning removing jobs and income which is the ultimate goal.
5:11 something is definitely off about this drum audio 🤔
I am a truck driver but I can't wait to see autonome trucks
Beverly will be happy while they still need her, once the tech gets good enough Beverly will be stuck at home, unemployed, getting supported by her family’s income along with millions of people at 1000s of other jobs
Or she'll be employed as the regional safety inspector, a job that would not exist without AI trucks. There's also the mechanics, software developers, and software debugger positions that would not exist either. They aren't removing jobs, they're replacing them with different ones.
How do these systems without the safety driver? Handle steer tire blow out of highway speeds, how do they avoid? Or react to certain forms of road debris or a mechanical failure that a redundancy has not been built into? Searchers of little bearing airbag blowout. The airlines becoming disconnected airlines being punctured or ripped off due to contact with road debris. We still have pilots in the airplane even though they have auto pilot. Because there's additional safety at all times to have the pilot and the system.
Agree. We put together an AI play list on the channel (Shameless subscription request @theassclowncircus) to discuss how AI impacts labor markets and trucks were the first one I chose.
What happens when an accident is happening and the truck has to decide what to hit?
Nice 👍😃
Does any body is working on making smart roads 🤔
One thing I've been thinking about is self driving trucks, that operate overnight. Originally I was thinking that they would be solar powered, charging during the day, discharging at night. But I don't really think that is a good idea anymore (for so many reasons).
Not only can a self driving truck be safer than a negligent human, but nighttime driving is far less congested.
It's really something that would work best once the technology gets better. 🙄
The next thing they will make is autonomous cops. This truck is a cargo filled with treasure for criminals. Some who were once truck drivers and others from industries that got disrupted by AI and machines. And yeah I might have watched too much dystopian movies lol.
Machine learning and AI is great, the risk is from the uneven distribution of wealth in the economy made by the owners of these techs.
They would have to charge for a week via solar.
Maybe we only need pilots in city area's and on the long streches we dont. Like ships
It would be nice if the trucks were also electric.
I mean the software should work with an electric truck no problem, but electric trucking doesn't make very much sense right now seeing as we need infrastructure to charge them dotted all over.
They do have electric sami truck but you're going to have to stop the power them up and that's the big problem unless you're going to pay drivers for that charge up Gap
Unfortunately new battery tech needs to be invented for electric long haul tractor trailer trucks.
I suspect that just like actual pilots, who are only there for takeoff, landing and adverse conditions. The trucker "pilot" has to be there to drive when not on the highway and back the trailer in etc.
You know, I'm here for a self driving truck. But like, is this not basically a train? Feels like we are reinventing the wheel
All ready to steam roll a motor bike or micro bus. Next, truck lines with vaxx style liability removal on the main ways.
Well no. Trains are limited to their train track.
Don't get me wrong: I want as much transport to happen by train as possible but sometimes there isn't an existing track and There isn't enough demand to create a new truck
@@thibaultmol I hear you, but I think the counter argument is that the trucks are also limited to the paved road. If a country invested into tracks as much as roads there would be a problem and because we have invested in roads for so long and have ignored the rail industry this is more of an obvious solution. Or at least that's how I see it.
I do think there is a place for this tech, just not for the long-haul type trips
@@TheManOfPeace999 A train transports huge amounts of different cargo all at once. You can not deliver produce to a shop oder material to a construction side via train.
@@oO0Xenos0Oo 100% agree, but I see a future where this is used in the long-haul trips where transit via train could be used. My statement goes for today as well where trains could be used rather than trucks.
👍
I don’t get it, the point of self driving trucks is to make up for the lack of truck drivers also so you don’t have to pay truck drivers, so now you’re paying for this expensive technology plus a truck driver, this doesn’t make any sense.
I think they should have dedicated highways/lanes with the most frequently traveled routes. The crash issue should definitely be researched further no human’s life should be sacrificed to this technolgy. The research should also focus on predictive driving behaviors exponentially.
Sounds like a train
"no human's life should be sacrificed to this technology" Humans are worse drivers so far, though. Lives are not being sacrificed to it, but to hold it back. Most vehicles driven by humans don't have a 360 degree view lacking any blind spots.
@@Vaeldarg”human drivers are worse so far” there’s literally not a single shred of evidence to back your statement. The amount of autonomous cars on the US roads are less than 0.01.% and have the Tesla autopilot and robotaxis have caused fatalities and collisions. So I’m not sure how to round that ratio but I’d guess at the moment are atleast 200X more dangerous. Even this woman didn’t trust it near enough to take her hands away from hovering the steering wheel.
@danielelij6997 Actually, Vaeldarg is absolutely correct, and you are completely mistaken. There is massive evidence that per-mile fatalities are far far worse for human drivers compared to autonomous vehicles. Do a little research before confirming you are an idiot.
Regulators will never allow semi trucks with no driver on the roads. Or if they do, it's gonna take a few generations.
Can it do its own pre and post trip inspections? Can it connect itself to a trailer? Can it fuel itself up? Can it weigh itself? Can it check in and out of customers on its own? Can it get DOT violations? Can it go to jail if something bad happens? Can it tickle you? 😂😂
after i watch lot of tesla crash videos i doubt trucks will get any safer.
This is awesome and much needed, but it definitely will take away jobs sadly. One day they won’t need safety drivers.
How would they unload freight?
@@ericli2936 The workers at the loading docks would do that. Drivers don’t do that anyways.
@@Parkerrrrr we run a restaurant and believe me, the drivers unload our food.
@@ericli2936 In the video they said it wouldn’t be for local delivery, also said it would take over 90% of delivery trucks. That leaves 10% that don’t convert over, and maybe the way you do things will change. But this most likely doesn’t apply to you then. This is more for long deliveries and big chains like grocery stores, mail service, etc.
@@Parkerrrrryou must have never done a flatbed before 😂
Hey Bev, good job stabbing us in the back
Embark went under early '23 FYI
I created a AI Impact video about trucking industry over on the channel and they were not in the survey I did of the top 10 companies. They have already been forgotten.
@@the495circus I wasn't commenting on your survey or any survey....but the company which is used in this video to illustrate driverless trucking...Embark.
@@the495circus Why do you suppose trains have not been automated, given that the tech has been around since the 50s to do so?
why she hold the wheel? it suppose to be self drive
Orange cone time.
This is the future.
In 100 years
this will never come to remote place and Australia and i for one would not trust it
So...question...why not just go autonomous with the Semi, and allow the lady driving feel what unemployment is like?
Unfortunately, Embark laid off 70% of its staff and was bought out.
This technology will boooom when they get their own roads with magnetic lines imbedded in or painted on the roads, or something similar. AND all the trucks need to be EV's.
you know how to bette automate traffic:
put it on rails.
Job title: Job destroyers
Rain, sleet, snow, wildlife... Machines aren't ready
And you're basing this on?
@@thibaultmolI’d base it the fact on how Tesla autopilot killed 2 motorcyclist last year. Also I’d base it on how that robotaxi delayed emergency vehicles to the scene of a deadly accident just a couple weeks ago. That’s a big one to base it on actually. Especially considering autonomous cars are literally 0.01% on the road. Let’s also base it on how self driving technology is pure electrical. Let’s throw it out there that 2023 cars get towed to dealerships more often then you think for common electrical issues that’s not near sophisticated as this new technology people as yourself believe will come right out the womb and make our roads completely safe overnight. We can’t even guarantee the thousands of TVs bought daily can come out of a box and work 100% but we want millions of newly built self driving semis running 65mph beside our families on highways because tech companies have built a few that’s made up 0.01% of cars/trucks on the roads that has in fact resulted in multiple fatalities that was just being tested on clear sunny days with a “safety operator” hovering her hand over a wheel? Yea there’s quite a lot you can base the original comment on.
Aren't ready.... "yet".
@@thibaultmolwho's going to put the chains on the truck tires when the snow comes? someone has to be there to put the chains on the tires. there's no tires that can bust through snow you big stupid
Self driving trucks will drive like grandma
even with self-driving vehicles, which are programmed by humans, there will still be human errors that can cause accidents. garbage in, garbage out, after all. it's why we still need human pilots with commercial airlines since lives are literally on the line for a safe travel (military drones that are programmed by humans to kill other humans are an entirely different matter, however).
Except you can get it to the point where it's safe enough for the road before letting it teach ITSELF better driving techniques. A computer with the right algorithms will always be able to perform and learn better than humans.
@@ryanthompson3737 Until corporations can get charged with manslaughter, for gross negligence when a serious accident happens, autonomous vehicles without a safety driver should be illegal. Self-driving cars and the corporations that make them, should have to take the rough with the smooth, and be held to the same standard as human drivers.
@@carultch Yeah, let's throw tesla in jail... or do you mean the millions of shareholders?
I work on a Ferry, and I know drivers can be real aholes and all problems inherent to human existence... But truckers are hardworking people that must keep their jobs for the good of the economy and society as a whole, self driving cars is ok for me as you pay for your lisure and confort... But let people work God dam 😂
Talks about how self driving vehicles are safer than human as she's getting passed on the right. Lol
For a self driving truck, she seems to be doing a lot of driving…
I think its awesome what she does, however, she is just hauling a big truck around with nothing in it. For testing purposes. If she would make actual deliveries, with a electric truck, now that would be even better.
I have also always wanted to driver since I was a kid, but like all my dreams masonic piece of shitts put a stop to it one way or the other, no matter how good I am at somethign , a million miles no accidnet and Delta Airlines has a reason to harm Me.
This is sad. With all of her experience she will trust a machine with her safety rather herself. Must be a bad driver.. I have the confidence to trust myself.. Machine can help but will not have responsible over my own life. You can not take a program to court for going in the wrong lane an killing a family. Especially if it's programmed to do this. It's sad when incompetence replace being lazy or skillful.. I believe she should just retire if she want machine driving for her.
I'm all for putting safety features on trucks like cameras in the blind spot laying assist radar so that you don't crash into something. However I'm also under the opinion that even with regular everyday cars as well.
there should never be a fully autonomous no human vehicle. I would say if I was able to pass one law on this matter It would be there has to be a human driver behind the wheel at all times that take over in case the computer has a malfunction.
Believe me the last thing you want is for a fully loaded semi going 80 mph to suffer the blue screen of death and decide it's going to continue to go 80 miles an hour and not know what the hell it's doing.
Modern cars (and planes, ships, trains etc) are alreade steered by wire. The human driver just gives an electrical input and this is translated into orders for electric actuators by a computer. If the computer completly breaks down it is over anyway.
@@oO0Xenos0Oo I'm not saying that we ban it all together I'm just saying that human and computer should be working together not the computer all by itself. I'm not talking about planes I know planes are fly by wire They have been since the '70s. I'm talking about ground vehicles. even modern cars the steering wheel has a mechanical system to connect to the wheels. on a modern car even if the system completely fries up you still have some form of control to pull yourself off the road.
where I am concerned is it's a computer fries up there's no buddy behind the wheel that can take control to get that semi off the road before it plows into a family of four killing everybody.
You probably won't get this reference but.
Michael was always in control of KITT Not the other way around.
I agree with your point, but I disagree with your timeframe. Currently the technology isn't there yet, they're just too unpredictable. Especially with something as heavy and deadly as a truck deciding it's going to ramraid an ambulance like Tesla's prone to doing.
But over enough time, and enough development. There's no reason in theory why a computer system couldn't be much safer than a human at driving. Especially if they can start ad-hoc networking with other vehicles, being alerted of events out of sight, or having vehicles AIs broadcast their intentions and negotiate gaps to pull in or cross other vehicles at high speed.
But it's not there yet, and it's going to be a long time. As the when dealing, with the consequences of getting it wrong are so steep. Luckily other companies seem to being a little less reckless then Tesla.
@@DevanshCS I've been on this earth a long time and while it is always astonished me with the ability of computers to follow orders their ability to give them has always never been 100% accurate and when you're dealing with a semi fully loaded traveling 80 miles an hour it has to be 100% accurate and that's never going to happen. I would prefer it if there was at least a human driver in the cab to watch over the computer. there has to be a way to do manual control.
Just like they're proving in Ukraine right now systems like the system you just described are a huge mistake because if you are able to hack into one of those vehicles and send false inputs to the rest of them you're fucked.
And before you say that it's impossible to hack into a moving vehicle. a group of researchers at MIT were able to hack into a Tesla and tell it to open the doors and start How soon do you think is going to be before they could tell it to accelerate and make a left turn when the driver wants to go right
@@highlander723 The mechanical connection between the steering whel and the wheels will be gone in a few years. We will also get breaking by wire. Automotive companies are working on it and they will lobby for it. Just a few days ago an american truck company achieved certification for full x-by-wire trucks. It is an illusion, that people are controlling mashines directly. Everything runs through computers these days and every vehicle might crash if the computer inside of it breaks down.
You fools don't understand. Eventually this will be every vehicle and we will no longer be able to choose where we want to go wake up
Well then why doesn't Beverly just worship a truck instead of God... I mean it's not like a computer ever crashed or locked up it's not never like your video game console ever froze up it's never like anything just went haywire within any electrical system I mean we pretty much have electrical systems 100% in cars Oh wait that's right no we don't! Let me explain something to you I've worked on cars for More than a couple decades in my life and I can tell you one thing The biggest problem with cars are electrical issues in emissions issues and the problems that are getting bigger and bigger are the electrical ones The emissions issues can't get worse there's only so much emissions products within your car. However there are a mile plus worth of wiring in your car that can go wrong. So let's look at this a wire gets wet your radio doesn't work right Well what happens when a wire gets wet and your brakes don't work or your accelerator doesn't work or your airbags or anything else... The fact is this lady obviously doesn't need to be driving a truck in her life as she seems to think it's too hard of a job for her and that having some type of robotic truck is better. That's great how would she survived so long if she didn't drive a truck that was her job and if she's not doing anything but sitting there then why are anybody paying her so what she's advocating for is the fact that she's useless in that robots are somehow all of a sudden better than humans even though our computer still crash and lock up and run slow and take too long to make decisions sometimes. That's fine when you're sitting at your desk but what happens when a truck needs to lock up its brakes with 80,000 lb of force at a speed of about 50 mph coming at the rear end of your car and it doesn't stop because everything's electronic and well computers running a little slow this time. These are the realities the facts of what they're trying to push on us they're pushing this because they want to change the industries that we had into non-existence so they can create new industries that they themselves can profit off of because they're not in the old industries. This is not technology is making things better for life this is technology is making the rich richer! And the amazing fact is how many gullible people especially in the media and the news and the investigators as well as those they interview show. The gold ability is ridiculous Y'all believe anything. Let me guess when a truck with a driver run someone over even though it's remote control you're going to want to charge the driver with murder and not the truck manufacturing company then what would Beverly be saying as she mulled someone over because the truck was in control and not her even if she chose not to let the truck kill someone she was steering every which way but well there's no pool connecting your steering wheel to the steering wheels. It's electronic now a computer decides the input you put in and the input it puts in into the motor that controls the actual drive wheels. You kill someone you go to prison and yet you tried to steer the truck to the other side but they made sure they didn't show that camera footage in court. Beverly you're gullible if it's not you being taken advantage of by the system it will be your children or grandchildren. Because you're not teaching them obviously that people actually make a lot better decisions than computers. Computers are controlled by those who program them if a bad person programs something that controls something else that's something else might do something wrong whereas people have morals if you're top morals and your top correctly it is extremely hard for you to break them you feel wrong by doing so A computer does not feel wrong by killing someone running over them with a vehicle it does what it's told simply there is no morals! So remember that when this all happens in the future as I just said remember Beverly the gullible idiot who told you it was a good idea to have robot trucks that don't need people to drive them and they don't need people to be alive. You ever heard of the Terminator judge Dread any of that it's coming true Y'all think I'm crazy now if you live the next 20-40 years remember my name and remember the regret you feel when you find out I was right now. Also I must say it's amazing how an old person is trying to prove that the technology to eliminate her job and everybody that would come after her. Is it really cool you obviously have no respect for the future truckers if you're so willing to sell your soul to try to push robotic trucking just saying facts are facts
Truck driving is the number one occupation of high school educated men in the United States. A gay woman is used to illustrate the technology that will eventually cause the loss of those jobs. That makes sense.
It's odd that in the trucking world where it's 99.5% men, you decide to focus on the one female you could find.
I get it though - it's like the news - dog bites man is normal - no story there - it's the man bites dog stories you want.
It's all 'bout the clicks.
It's actually closer to 84%, but let's not worry about the specifics, right?
@@ryanthompson3737 Right.
Good luck with having an AI truck deliver gasoline, like she described her entire career, before this gig came along. Or dump trucks backing into off road control sites, hauling cars, heavy haul, specialized load, any delivery job. Only the most basic of shitty drivers can be replaced by this garbage.
She’s a Traitor
What an ego!
REPENT AND FOLLOW JESUS CHRIST BEFORE ITS TOO LATE 🔴