Hello friends! Thank you so much for watching! I’ve only recently started on RUclips, and this is one of my first videos. I really hope you’ll find it interesting and somewhat entertaining. Please, please do subscribe to the channel - at this early stage, your support has a HUGE impact, and absolutely every person counts. I am doing this full-time now, and if you want to see how it goes, it would be great to have you on board! As always, feel free to reach out for any feedback, questions and suggestions. You can ping me on Twitter or via email in the channel description. Thank you for your help and support!
hey, could u do a video on how do professionals determine if an option is overpriced due to demand, vice versa and how do option traders read volatility to make their trades?
Great video - loving the overlay with figures, makes the video very easy to follow when compared to the whiteboard videos. The house analogy is also great as everyone can understand/relate, so more of these please!
Thank you so much for covering this topic Sergei. Your presentation skills are wonderful, it's actually a delight to watch this critical information being covered in such an entertaining way.
Thanks for the Video. Here is a idea for a video. Maybe a P/S video looking to enter into newer growth companies but not sure how to fairly value it because the P/E is 0 or Negative
Great video. Maybe add a section on how to use this in real life investing. I suppose we would look for companies with EV < MC as undervalued, and vice versa such as the Fannie Mae example.
Hi Sergei, thank you for your educative work. Watching at EV = Market Cap + Tot Debt - Cash; why don’t you adjust also for Capex and Net Working Capital? Sorry if the question is basic. Thank you in advance
CAPEX is an expense. It is a _flow_ over time. EV and MktCap are each a _stock._ (Recall stock versus flow: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_and_flow). So, CAPEX is like part of a movie, but EV and MktCap are like snapshots. Net Working Capital (NWC) is a stock, but that is a subset of EV. So, it is already in there.
@@PerfilievFinancialTraining yes i didt ! Very well. It is the amount thats needed to buy the company the at current prices ! Hence debt becomes an addition. We have a live example, just today AIR INDIA WAS BOUGHT FROM GOVT BY TATAS, COST THEM 18000CR RUPEES OF WHICH 15KCR IS DEBT
What if the company decides to issue more shares? If the equation is Market Cap = Shares x Share Value Just double the shares and you double the market cap?
I just cant understand why the cash is not into market cap... Can a company have a stock price smaller than the cash per share value? It doesnt make sense for me
I am not sure I agree with this theory, based on EMH the share price reflects all present and past information. So if you were to take out the debt the market cap would change. I think the formula is flawed but happy to be proven wrong, I just can’t see how it makes sense at the moment.
Hello friends! Thank you so much for watching! I’ve only recently started on RUclips, and this is one of my first videos. I really hope you’ll find it interesting and somewhat entertaining. Please, please do subscribe to the channel - at this early stage, your support has a HUGE impact, and absolutely every person counts. I am doing this full-time now, and if you want to see how it goes, it would be great to have you on board! As always, feel free to reach out for any feedback, questions and suggestions. You can ping me on Twitter or via email in the channel description. Thank you for your help and support!
hey, could u do a video on how do professionals determine if an option is overpriced due to demand, vice versa and how do option traders read volatility to make their trades?
Great video - loving the overlay with figures, makes the video very easy to follow when compared to the whiteboard videos. The house analogy is also great as everyone can understand/relate, so more of these please!
Thanks for the feedback, Grant! Glad it was useful! :)
Look at the natural flow of sentences, words coming out without the slightest trace of weirdness, such eloquence, much wow.
Hahaha, thank you! After two days of failed attempts! :D
Thank you so much for covering this topic Sergei.
Your presentation skills are wonderful, it's actually a delight to watch this critical information being covered in such an entertaining way.
Hey Sukhmander! Thanks so much for watching this and for your kind words! Glad you liked it :)
@@PerfilievFinancialTraining sure
Good explanation!
Really good vide! Liked ✅
Thank you!
Thanks Sergei. This video was worth the wait !
Hahaha, thank you! :D
Great explanation of such complex subject! Well done! Thank you.
Thanks so much! Appreciate it :)
Another great video Sergei! Thank you.
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it!
Straight to the point!! cheers
Thank you, Joe!
Great work Sergei, the 2 fucked up days where worth it!
Thanks a lot! :) Appreciate it!
Thank you for all the good info recently on your Twitter account. Subscribing here to support you.
Thank you so much! Really appreciate it :)
Hi Sergei. Nice video👍
Thanks for watching! :)
Świetnie wideo. Ciekawa informacja, będę i dalej obejrzał Pana filmiki) Diękuję i powodzenia!
Wielkie dzięki za oglądanie! Naprawdę się cieszę, że Ci się podobało.
Thanks for the Video. Here is a idea for a video. Maybe a P/S video looking to enter into newer growth companies but not sure how to fairly value it because the P/E is 0 or Negative
Yesssss
I know! :D
Thanks. Well explained, as usual. Keep going!
Thank you!
Great video. Maybe add a section on how to use this in real life investing. I suppose we would look for companies with EV < MC as undervalued, and vice versa such as the Fannie Mae example.
Thank you for watching, will try to do so in the future.
Great Video. Very well explained
Great explanation - and 10k subscribers is 🔥for a start
Thank you! Glad you liked it - really appreciate it :)
awesome explanation.. keep making great contents dude!
Thanks Parlin, appreciate it! :)
Good work
Thank you!
Thank you
Great video a lot of understanding!! Weird known company META
Thank you for watching! Glad you enjoyed it :)
@@PerfilievFinancialTraining yes it was very very informative of the basics
Thank you so much for this clear explanation. It was even better than AI!
As always thank you for your content.
Hey, thanks so much for watching!
Great info thanks
so, the larger the debt leverage, the larger the enterprise value? wow, what a great metric!
The best video explaining these definitions 👍🏻❤
Excellent!
Many thanks!
Thank you
Hey why you stopped creating videos! If u want the convexity of RUclips you should be consistent! Wish u luck 🍀 i love ur videos 👏
Hi Sergei, thank you for your educative work.
Watching at EV = Market Cap + Tot Debt - Cash; why don’t you adjust also for Capex and Net Working Capital? Sorry if the question is basic. Thank you in advance
CAPEX is an expense. It is a _flow_ over time. EV and MktCap are each a _stock._ (Recall stock versus flow: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_and_flow). So, CAPEX is like part of a movie, but EV and MktCap are like snapshots. Net Working Capital (NWC) is a stock, but that is a subset of EV. So, it is already in there.
Why should we add debt to company? Isn't debt to be subtracted and cash and equivalents to be added?
I hope the video clarified this a bit ;)
@@PerfilievFinancialTraining yes i didt ! Very well. It is the amount thats needed to buy the company the at current prices ! Hence debt becomes an addition.
We have a live example, just today AIR INDIA WAS BOUGHT FROM GOVT BY TATAS, COST THEM 18000CR RUPEES OF WHICH 15KCR IS DEBT
What if the company decides to issue more shares?
If the equation is Market Cap = Shares x Share Value
Just double the shares and you double the market cap?
I just cant understand why the cash is not into market cap... Can a company have a stock price smaller than the cash per share value? It doesnt make sense for me
I am not sure I agree with this theory, based on EMH the share price reflects all present and past information. So if you were to take out the debt the market cap would change. I think the formula is flawed but happy to be proven wrong, I just can’t see how it makes sense at the moment.
bro has some personal grudge with meta💀