Proof of Concept - Turning a bill into a check

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 авг 2024
  • Sending out bills a checks, Pursuant to 31 CRF 328.5 and the UCC Article 3
    This is the way YOU are supposed to pay.

Комментарии • 56

  • @william-coalstondean9109
    @william-coalstondean9109 9 дней назад +5

    Read to the end, and it will tell you how to endorse a coupon to the Treasury, not Fedral Reserve Bank.
    Follow the instructions exactly.

  • @curtcooper5465
    @curtcooper5465 9 дней назад +3

    Thanks for the content sir .God speed to you . Any word as some process are up hill and take forever

  • @Don-sx5xv
    @Don-sx5xv 8 дней назад +5

    Nice channel, show them first what freedom looks like, then demonstrate in real life how to get there.

  • @willtuanaki1854
    @willtuanaki1854 2 дня назад +2

    You can't "Accept for Deposit and Value". Those are opposing terms. Acceptance for value means you've performed and are operating in honor of the reorganization of the Emergency Banking Act. You have to understand what you're doing by acceptance and why it's being sent back to the corporation. Making it an instrument to be deposited makes it a non-negotiable instrument. What you want is to convey a negotiable instrument back to them, one which they can in turn convey/transfer right title and interest to the Treasury, thereby completing a valuable exchange. It's a good attempt, but you're missing some very key elements here. I recommend keeping up your bill payments until you get remedy going this route.

    • @CameronPrickett
      @CameronPrickett  День назад

      @@willtuanaki1854 🤦‍♂️ love it. Thankfully I was keeping up on em. Thank you for your clarification here as well. Your words are helpful for everyone who wants to pay attention! I see the difference now.

  • @lowdoughgarage
    @lowdoughgarage 19 дней назад +7

    Man! I’m excited for you! I haven’t actually done anything yet. There are definitely many creators talking about this. I’ve listened to a lot. I’d like to see the outcome of this BOE. Thank you for sharing. I’ll never forget the statement: If you want to hide something put it in a book.

  • @secretary.of.estatechief-c6220
    @secretary.of.estatechief-c6220 5 дней назад

    Great demonstration! A lot of information in 3min. That's Great. Much-needed & appreciated.🎉🎉😊

    • @CameronPrickett
      @CameronPrickett  5 дней назад

      @@secretary.of.estatechief-c6220 thank you!!

  • @william-coalstondean9109
    @william-coalstondean9109 9 дней назад +1

    It clearly states that in cfr 328.6, the endorsement you should write.

  • @joefnh
    @joefnh 7 дней назад +2

    Has anyone actually firsthand seen this work?

    • @celebratedrazorworks
      @celebratedrazorworks День назад

      It IS technically legal. Most Law is commercial jurisdiction, US is a corporation which sets up corpses for each "Citizen" born in it's jurisdiction. Ur social security card is insurance on your 'Trust' issued by a bank. Usury is technically illegal 😂 but over the years they finagled work arounds so much that it has become commonplace to just accept what we are told about how money, currency, & promissory notes ACTUALLY work. They have not had to deal with this in decades and will not know what to do.
      The way I know this is true is because we all learned as children that if u don't have a check IT IS LEGAL to write on a napkin if you write the right things. 🤑

  • @mickIIXV
    @mickIIXV 19 часов назад

    🤦 Well, he did spell Endorsement with an "I", so....

  • @mrDADtheSecond
    @mrDADtheSecond 8 дней назад +1

    When they "discharge the debt", they will send you a 1099C, and it will be counted as an income that is taxable
    , correct?

    • @CameronPrickett
      @CameronPrickett  8 дней назад

      @@mrDADtheSecond I do believe you’re correct.

  • @kaiiherb2206
    @kaiiherb2206 10 дней назад

    supposed to send to the Treasury i think

  • @Strel-il7vj
    @Strel-il7vj 8 дней назад +1

    Does not work. Will not work.

  • @j.pocket
    @j.pocket Месяц назад +2

    Are you, yourself, a _Bank_ ? (The specific instructions you read from Cornell Law clearly states in the title of the section, and in the summary, that this section and endorsement is For Banks.)
    Wouldn't you rather convert it from a _Bearer Security_ (check) to a _Book Entry Security_ (credit) to your account?

    • @CameronPrickett
      @CameronPrickett  Месяц назад +1

      @@j.pocket you bring up a great point. If the ens legis is not a bank, then there may be problems here. How do you go about converting such security in that way?

    • @atxlumberjake
      @atxlumberjake 20 дней назад +5

      Get your private individual bankers ein now you're a bank

    • @Xrpurple
      @Xrpurple 20 дней назад +3

      Be your own bank!

    • @auditingamerikkka1627
      @auditingamerikkka1627 19 дней назад +3

      @@atxlumberjakeyou don’t need none of that lol just stamp,indorse and send

    • @atxlumberjake
      @atxlumberjake 18 дней назад +1

      @@auditingamerikkka1627 have you had a successful sign endorse send? I did it for my truck but have not received any remedy.

  • @ganapatikitty
    @ganapatikitty 14 дней назад +2

    Did it go through? I've sent several coupons that are quite similar to yours and haven't been accepted yet.

    • @CameronPrickett
      @CameronPrickett  13 дней назад +6

      I've sent some others as well, but I've only faced roadblocks from the institutions. I'm learning that it's more about informing the governing body of your state/country that you're no longer a minor and wish to gain guardianship over your person and estate.

    • @Overth_inc
      @Overth_inc 10 дней назад +2

      ​@@CameronPricketti just recently learned this as well, in that its more effective to go thru the necessary processes/paperwork to have your Age of Majority placed on the record before sending in restrictive indorsements, even though not doing so could work as well (but likely with some form of arbitrarion or litigation). Does that sound accurate to you too?

    • @CameronPrickett
      @CameronPrickett  10 дней назад +4

      @@Overth_inc Very true. I've been continually studying since I made this video, and that part is very important. It's important that you do that through the county in which you were born/your ens legis was registered.

    • @CameronPrickett
      @CameronPrickett  10 дней назад +3

      The company didn't mark my account as paid. They have a third party accept the payments by mail. So if I were to obtain remedy on this particular case, I'd have to go through the court, and use the administrative process and contract law to my advantage.

    • @curtcooper5465
      @curtcooper5465 9 дней назад

      Hopefully you don't have to that for every acct. Did you formally accept the agreement ?

  • @thrillbillyjp1
    @thrillbillyjp1 9 дней назад +2

    Well this video confirms this guy's completely Goshen us. All the terms he has attempted to use have either countered themselves or gave wrong explanation with wrong remittence performing outline. Ok if settling an account u will credit the same to , transfer principle to xyz company deposit same to minor acct listed within terms expressed in cover page. Must tender to treasury when looking recive lawfull payment whichbis tran a fering of credits to tda registered through living estate or forign grantor trust.. stop playing buddy.. some if us are savvyy in this form of bennifets accommodated through new deal and emgemcy banking act as well as endorsement procedures of a new deal or new kind. Restrictive is when u stated whom thus payable to such as bearer etc.. signing without listing payee via payable to is blank endorsement . Those must tender to to u.s. treasury or fiscal services dept. Xyz still cresit same to .. must direct what the intrest instructed as to. Btw this is not administering estate in completion this is merrily billing statement instruction from acting agent yeah . Get u some folks.

    • @CameronPrickett
      @CameronPrickett  8 дней назад

      @@thrillbillyjp1 thanks for the clarification! Just trying to sort it all out!

  • @Gabe_realm
    @Gabe_realm 7 дней назад

    I just turned one in to capital one
    Has anybody had luck with capital yet?
    I heard they’re difficult to get through

    • @CameronPrickett
      @CameronPrickett  7 дней назад

      @@Gabe_realm Nice! I don’t use CapitalOne, but from what I’ve heard, they either send you to collections or cancel your credit line/card.

  • @conniedillard2360
    @conniedillard2360 22 дня назад +4

    Do you understand that this is fraud?

    • @CameronPrickett
      @CameronPrickett  21 день назад +13

      Supply the proof...

    • @Xrpurple
      @Xrpurple 20 дней назад

      It’s fraud to the fools wearing the “obey” hat that has been falsely indoctrinated at birth. “They” do it twice while you are committed to the lie!

    • @User0player1
      @User0player1 19 дней назад +2

      its ok muggle.

    • @luckyjoemaximus1454
      @luckyjoemaximus1454 12 дней назад

      the government system is a fraud. it states in their own regulation from 1933 that there is no money and thats the remdy instead themselves commiting treason

    • @kaiiherb2206
      @kaiiherb2206 10 дней назад

      lmfaoooooo

  • @zuch0698o
    @zuch0698o 6 дней назад +3

    This is that soverign citizen stupidity. This is not realistic and you are being lied to, trying to cash one of these " real checks" is a felony

    • @Lisa_M_V
      @Lisa_M_V 3 дня назад

      And lockdowns based on fraud have serious consequences. Fraud committed by governments and CEOs of most organisations. Look into it. Your SIGNATURE creates the money. The trust was put in place for this reason

    • @Lisa_M_V
      @Lisa_M_V 3 дня назад

      You can’t be a sovereign and a citizen. That’s oxymoron. A citizen is a slave. A sovereign is not. We are sovereign at birth but the certificate turned us into bonded ‘stock’

    • @vanillathehexican4142
      @vanillathehexican4142 День назад

      The entire UCC is bunk...is that what you're saying? XD