It is a shame too since it was a game changer for those who wielded it in Afghanistan. Engagement time were reduced significantly and no casualties during the time they were engaged with the weapon.
@A dude with a flashlight There was a reported accident where the gun blew up and there were lingering reliability issues so they canceled the program. Funny enough, a new request for a similar gun is being sought by the Army.
@@Cain-x It was also heavy, cumbersome, and a general pain in the ass to carry around. It quickly became something you just throw in the back of a humvee instead of carrying it around, like the AT4, Carl Gustav, etc. But I mean, when it worked it worked really well.
The Army had 22 Divisions in the Pacific during WWII. The Marines had only 6. The largest contested beach landing in history happened at Normandy, with zero Marines present. There were more than twice as many Army divisions than Marine divisions present at Okinawa. Half the US regiments involved in the Inchon landings in the Korean war were US Army. The Marines' most famous victory at Iwo Jima still had an Army regiment present with them. The list goes on, and on, and on. So, sorry ace, the myth of the Marines coming ashore on a contested beach being something unique to them is an utter fantasy. The Army has done it more often, on a larger scale and completely without the Marine's support, which is something the Marines never accomplished without the Army. All that said, The Marines are largely abandoning the contested beach landing as a viable tactic because modern weapons have made it far too costly a venture. The Navy is moving towards a much smaller Marine Corps focused on seizing uncontested littorals, setting up and protecting air defense and long range precision fires to make space for the Navy's ships closer to the shore. It seems like a good mission for them and fills a critical need as blue water vessels become more vulnerable to long range shore based weapons. That said, by its very design, will attempt to keep the Marines away from combat, not fling them into it, so thump your chest a little softer m'kay?
So we're going to call our drones "Air Small Systems"? ASS? [EDIT]: Okay, now I know this is pure fantasy. I can tell because: 1. Soldiers riding on bench troop seats in the back of the open-topped Light Infantry Vehicle; not strapped down with Reflective belts. I could sense the disturbance in the Force as the entire corps of Us Army Sergeants-Major choked on their toaster strudels when they saw that. 2. An infantry rifle that is *not* an M16 variant. *It will never happen*. Otherwise pretty cool.
@@Knight_Kin Very true... but after decades of false promises, I won't fully believe it until the armorer is shoving a brand-new rifle into my sticky little fingers and making me sign for it. XD
it's realistic though. Russia, if it will still exist, will be extremely degraded and will have technologically regressed by 2028. They are already fighting with restored museum inventory. It's more like 1894-1964 equipment
I cant fathom how deeply delusional people must be to think Russia is a inept, outdated military when theyre pushing Ukraine to collapse and causing NATO to freakout on military and civilian fronts (economic/industrial capabilities).
@@sigis72 Actually, they are in a wartime economy that is supported by the world's 2nd largest economy, so while the switch back to peacetime economy will be painful, I don't think they'll regress technologically by 2028. Your leaders just pushed them deeper into Chinese orbit. I know USA wields polarization as its strategy, but still, it was a bad idea to burn bridges when USA is preparing for kicking Chinese behinds. USA could(should) have kicked the Russia can down the road. Wasn't as if Russians were getting any stronger, quite the opposite really. Or maybe USA is just playing some 4D chess by having Russia vs Ukraine as a proxy China vs USA battle to see which post RMA tactics and strategies work and which don't, in order to ground US mil doctrine in reality and verify future to&es.
We were told that as a brigade we were expected to kill a division before we died. So 3-4 times our size. To break even we had to kill 4 tanks for every one we lost. So far our kill ratio is about 25 to 1. That is a hell of a kill ratio.
Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF), really? It's a LIGHT TANK. Why does the Army refuse to call a spade a spade? US Army: "Because it's not a spade, it's a Soldier Portable Field Emplacement Creation Device (SPFECD)."
The reasons are - Designed around people that might not be familiar with culture, like any (full on 0 social exposure). Basically a person who has scholar skills, can read, understand and read between intentions of words. But anything that's common word or culturally known as is avoided like the plague. - NATO compliance, any nation who bases its doctrine around cooperation with this need to have a copy in their language, some words dont have a translation and coming up with words that follow rule 1 in their language is just a lot of hassle. Keeping to basic "root" words, translation easy. -No misunderstandings, they make sure that each sentence, and word doesn't have any double meaning. Eliminates confusion by giving a very aggressively specific way of wording something. Basically it follows the same layout as laws and statues do, overly specific, so much that it becomes a chore to read. But it eliminates any responsibility by the author of those works. In reality its very much KISS design but they switch the commonly used words with hyper exact ones. Also the reason why they sound weird, because they are not talking to you, the word garble you read is specifically designed in ways to prioritize, first mention important, then details of that important, do not start mentioning other thing until first thing, which important is fully contextualized. Then the second one, then the third one, etc.
Very nice demo. What would be REALLY cool would be throwing these hypothetical/new weapon systems into a game like Squad or Arma III and see how players use them. Could get some interesting insight before any time and money is spent building them.
The program these visuals are from is the military version of Arma. Believe me when I say they already have. Additionally, Arma groups are too small to really have a lot of this stuff become a factor, this from a guy who plays platoon sized operations in Arma 3 every other week. You need to go to at least battalion level for most of this to be remotely relevant.
@@EvilTwinn Very interesting. I think perhaps the Army should invest more in that kind of virtual training for actual personnel. Would kill two birds with one stone! As a member of the Army, I've always thought realistic FPS games like those I mentioned would be extremely effective training for certain aspects, namely communication and tactics. It'd basically be the equivalent of a flight sim like pilots use.
@@gardnert1 Yeah, virtual training is undoubtedly the way of the future, the problem is coming up with ways for it to be as relevant for the infantryman as they want it to be and as economical as they'd like. Perhaps VR headsets can help with that at some point.
@@gardnert1 I mean, you are already seeing it. It's VBS 3, a "training simulator" built on top of the engine (Real Virtuality 3) that runs ArmA 2 (last time I checked anyway). One of the problem is that up until recent versions of ArmA3 (Real Virtuality 4), the control scheme is really clunky. Hell, even with improvement in controls and animations, it's still pretty awful. And I doubt "they" have backported the improvements back to VBS 3, given that BIS and BISim have officially separated. And because all o this training is obviously done on government computers, you can't have Joe messing around with settings, which means they are stuck with (I kid you not) controls and animations inherited straight from 2001. So what will end up happening is that you are forcing bunch of Joes to play a "video game" that has crap graphics, clunky animation that gets in the way (e.g. your virtual avatar insists on walking forward while throwing grenade because the walking animation doesn't stop even after you stopped pressing the forward key), awful control scheme that they are not familiar with, all while going through a scenario that is completely divorced from reality. The Joes will not care and get hemmed up, and entire training day was wasted. And at the end of the day, they'll go back to their barracks and play the newest version of Call of Battlefield Honor with fancy graphics, silky smooth animations and controls. And maybe, just maybe, some of them are motivated enough to play ArmA 3 (which has relatively modern graphics, animations, and controls) with a few realism mods (e.g. ACE3, ACRE2) with similarly motivated people online (whom may or may not even be in the military), and unironically get better training from that than whatever VBS 3 could offer. Let's not even mention "America's Army", which was another can of worms lol.
So the "enemy" doesnt have support battalions, artillery, drones, arial support, proper counterattack etc. Yeah you should have added nuclear strike in attacking force arsenal too since its so much fantasy
Yeah this is a brigade vs a batallion, for some reason? And the brigade has plenty of armor (despite being air-dropped nearby) but the "home team" doesn't have so much as a single tank? It's nonsense, may as well show a tiger beating up a puppy
versatility & survivability of ground elements of IBCT are of paramount importance!!! especially the tactical capabilities in a unified network centric warfare!!! JLTV ain't suitable for this scenario!!! rather the AM GENERAL BRV-O® i-HYBRID 4WD + 5.0 in. Lift 6.3 TDI V8 / 90.0 kWh E-DRIVE 4-Dr Armoured Infantry Scout Vehicle (LHD) is a more appropriate ground mobility asset!!! armed with roof mounted 23 MM GAU-23/E rotary cannon & .50 Cal on a standard issue RWS, it could be absolutely lethal on the enemy!!!
@@seanmac1793 That's why we have Stryker brigade combat teams. Strykers can be equipped with 30mm cannon or the 105mm cannon. I have seen them in action in Iraq.
@@ht-sneakers80 because there are different standards for strategic airlift time and requirements. I can't remenber the exact numbers but IBCT supposed to a faster call in with less restrictions on airfield size
That’s what I’m saying, that’s why the Army created the Stryker BCT to fill in the gap between a light infantry regiment and a armored regiment. Stryker = Fast mobile & a little fire power.
One company of Mobile protected firepower 14 light tanks . For direct fire support to the Infantry. Not meant to go toe to toe with T-80s, 90s etc. Army selected GDLS MPF and is designated the M10 Booker. Given a long drawn out slugfest with Russia, China, Iran, Norks- take your pick of combos, the Army should also get the M8 Buford Armored gun system/ MPF, light tanks .
@@coreyjacobs2718 not c130 transportable, not air droppable, not sling loadable, not amphibious, so all of the fights it can get to, you could bring actual tanks.
@@username_3715 False, you can air transport 2 of them on a c130. It's the "General Dynamics Griffin II" that was selected as the new light tank MPF. It's 38 tons unlike the Abrams which is much heavier. The Army will have about 100 of them by the end of next year (end of 2023).
Radar / BLUFOR tracking / datalink shit. Whoever designed it is probably not an actual engineer although, shit looks HALO and ass to transport / maintain. Also limiting the 360 turn for something that could've been put to a location where it doesnt affect it. The entire approach is a HUGE grain of salt. Only takeaway from the video is probably the approach and methods of working the problem, not the gear or vehicles.
It's literally a Stryker BCT but with pickup trucks and shitty expensive, "assault rifles" that are really just battle rifles, thus throwing away everything that we've learned from decades of combat experience: "precision fire is a meme. Suppression fire wins the day, every day." I'll take my Stryker that can transport my squad WITH armor and firepower over fucking pickup trucks and MRAPs that flip over going offroad with horrible troop dismount ratios please. Thanks a lot military industrial complex for making even more useless shit we don't need for 4x the price it should be.
Apparently, the Standard Division, Heavy will have Stryker BCTs and the Standard Divsion, Light is leg infantry with motorized transport. Evidently, they won't fight from the ISVs, but will dismount short of the objective to advance on foot. Now, whether that will happen in actual pratice, is something I doubt.
What is it with the Army’s word salads now. “Multi domain omni directional confrontation” yeah? You mean a front, like in every war ever? We aren’t the first batch to use and fight in land, sea, air and orbit. “Multi role stealth” yeah holy shit its like you can use something for multiple purposes. “Tactical mobility”… you mean menuevering?? “Combat variance” oh ok so the standard issue unit. Like holy shit guys… officers try not souping up the English language for another medal
To anybody watching that thinks about joining if your qualified just do it . This video is all non sense you most likely won't get to do any of these cool things in the video and might be sent to war with a broken weapon and have to buy your own sling with your own money. The reason is you will get to do stuff not in the video that will stay with you for your life . Also you get to retire at 20 years with a pension at 39 years old .
@@shotya9403 even if they are you still have to fight them for the Money you will get it . I'm still rich just because I have free healthcare for life and it probably saved my life already. If I had normal healthcare I would still be scared to go to the doctor and most likely dying of Cancer.
@@DrDabb47 Many veterans who got out just get simply ditched, become homeless. It does suck that many people who served their country end up in such a bad state. Im glad that some are able to benefit from it and actually get the benefits they are entitled to, but still many end up in shit situations when they leave the army.
@@shotya9403 I'm realistic when I talk to people about joining the military. Most people would benefit if they are qualified . Im still fighting for my full compensation but the healthcare thing is a big deal when u have to use it .
None of this gear will make any difference if we keep doing the fighting an unwinnable war thing people won't keep enlisting for that shit either by the way
Your PID is terrible Thats soviet equipment, literally SSH helmets and cold war weapons The camo is something along the lines of a VSR variant. The army intentionally uses them, since its the definite most basic ass conventional force that countries evolved from.
Bro if you think Cav scouts are going to ride in that death box you're high. WTF is that thing? StrykerX and StrykerX dragoon > LRV GTFO of here with that nonsense.
![Strykers: U.S. Army Medium Infantry [Explained]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tuEJGyHrSlM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Strykers: U.S. Army Medium Infantry [Explained]](/img/tr.png)
![Six Hundred Strike [EPIC: The Musical] Full Animatic](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zov6NXIAuow/mqdefault.jpg)
1:45 - I knew from that image alone that the Objective Cat was to be the Sahrani Airfield
Being both in the Army and an avid ArmA player throughout the years, these videos are a treat.
SLA is back and Queen Isabella is feeling the pressure...
@@RHphoto I absolutely agree.
OMG, the military jargon has exploded into multilayered multisyllabic multidimensional fubar.
You know it‘s gonna be bad when they slap on the adverbs.
4:32 - Wait I thought the Army was no longer using the XM-25. Let alone in 2028.
It is a shame too since it was a game changer for those who wielded it in Afghanistan. Engagement time were reduced significantly and no casualties during the time they were engaged with the weapon.
@A dude with a flashlight There was a reported accident where the gun blew up and there were lingering reliability issues so they canceled the program. Funny enough, a new request for a similar gun is being sought by the Army.
@@Cain-x It was also heavy, cumbersome, and a general pain in the ass to carry around. It quickly became something you just throw in the back of a humvee instead of carrying it around, like the AT4, Carl Gustav, etc. But I mean, when it worked it worked really well.
That thing was a piece of junk. Airburst 84mm rounds are much more useful, on a proven weapon
Man, looks like Sahrani is in turmoil again.
Near peers defending positions with a technical. Don't worry guys, call up our next gen tank.
Love the sendup to OP FP faces on "Atropian" Soldiers! Heart.
So even in 2028...
The Marines must still at least take, secure, and hold, a beachhead.
That's great news.
The Army had 22 Divisions in the Pacific during WWII. The Marines had only 6. The largest contested beach landing in history happened at Normandy, with zero Marines present.
There were more than twice as many Army divisions than Marine divisions present at Okinawa.
Half the US regiments involved in the Inchon landings in the Korean war were US Army.
The Marines' most famous victory at Iwo Jima still had an Army regiment present with them.
The list goes on, and on, and on.
So, sorry ace, the myth of the Marines coming ashore on a contested beach being something unique to them is an utter fantasy. The Army has done it more often, on a larger scale and completely without the Marine's support, which is something the Marines never accomplished without the Army.
All that said,
The Marines are largely abandoning the contested beach landing as a viable tactic because modern weapons have made it far too costly a venture. The Navy is moving towards a much smaller Marine Corps focused on seizing uncontested littorals, setting up and protecting air defense and long range precision fires to make space for the Navy's ships closer to the shore. It seems like a good mission for them and fills a critical need as blue water vessels become more vulnerable to long range shore based weapons. That said, by its very design, will attempt to keep the Marines away from combat, not fling them into it, so thump your chest a little softer m'kay?
Great video! Glad to see more content rolling out. Love it.
ruclips.net/video/KhVbr0OyAOE/видео.html
So we're going to call our drones "Air Small Systems"?
ASS?
[EDIT]: Okay, now I know this is pure fantasy. I can tell because:
1. Soldiers riding on bench troop seats in the back of the open-topped Light Infantry Vehicle; not strapped down with Reflective belts. I could sense the disturbance in the Force as the entire corps of Us Army Sergeants-Major choked on their toaster strudels when they saw that.
2. An infantry rifle that is *not* an M16 variant. *It will never happen*.
Otherwise pretty cool.
Bro on the infantry rifle that is not the m16 variant is real bro and being advocated for the us milltary check the ngsw XM5 AND XM250
This aged well. Lol.
It's literally all happening, built and developed. It'll be years before it comes up to scale but it looks well apace.
@@Knight_Kin Very true... but after decades of false promises, I won't fully believe it until the armorer is shoving a brand-new rifle into my sticky little fingers and making me sign for it. XD
An American IBCT from 2028 fighting a Russian battalion from 1994 doesn't seem like a particularly interesting comparison.
Well they’re not exactly meant to face a Russian motor rifle brigade head-on. Thats the ABCT’s job. IBCT’s are meant for low intensity stuff like this
Well its downrigjt unfair to the russians for a modern one
See ukraine war.
it's realistic though. Russia, if it will still exist, will be extremely degraded and will have technologically regressed by 2028. They are already fighting with restored museum inventory. It's more like 1894-1964 equipment
I cant fathom how deeply delusional people must be to think Russia is a inept, outdated military when theyre pushing Ukraine to collapse and causing NATO to freakout on military and civilian fronts (economic/industrial capabilities).
@@sigis72 Actually, they are in a wartime economy that is supported by the world's 2nd largest economy, so while the switch back to peacetime economy will be painful, I don't think they'll regress technologically by 2028. Your leaders just pushed them deeper into Chinese orbit. I know USA wields polarization as its strategy, but still, it was a bad idea to burn bridges when USA is preparing for kicking Chinese behinds. USA could(should) have kicked the Russia can down the road. Wasn't as if Russians were getting any stronger, quite the opposite really.
Or maybe USA is just playing some 4D chess by having Russia vs Ukraine as a proxy China vs USA battle to see which post RMA tactics and strategies work and which don't, in order to ground US mil doctrine in reality and verify future to&es.
This is outstanding, thank you for your service.
ruclips.net/video/KhVbr0OyAOE/видео.html
We were told that as a brigade we were expected to kill a division before we died. So 3-4 times our size. To break even we had to kill 4 tanks for every one we lost. So far our kill ratio is about 25 to 1. That is a hell of a kill ratio.
The updated East Germans didn't stand a chance.
bruh this is just mods added into an ARMA 2 scenario
You Fr?
I read that For simulation training, the army literally uses software made by the same company that develops Arma, soo…
@@SIickTurtIe there is a video of Chinese troops using Arma 3 to train lol
What do you expect? It’s just a video showing the troops while the audio describes the plan.
You are not wrong. Specifically, its VBS3 simulations made by Bohemia interactive for US armed forces, based on arma2 engine.
Can the army also field the new ABCDEFG IFV?
You are Excellent in your field.
ruclips.net/video/KhVbr0OyAOE/видео.html
Where is field artillery?
Ayeee I need those Aim Bot Eye Pro sent to my Unit ASAP!!
ruclips.net/video/KhVbr0OyAOE/видео.html
Ivas? They're amazing... And cheap comparatively. Plus at least 100 degree fov color NV with thermal overlay
Oh they're also lighter than envgb
I wish I could make something similar for the Civil Affairs BN CMOC & CIM
This strategy game looks neat. I wanna play 😀
You can, VBS is the commercial version of Bohemia Interactive's Armed Assault series.
Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF), really?
It's a LIGHT TANK.
Why does the Army refuse to call a spade a spade?
US Army: "Because it's not a spade, it's a Soldier Portable Field Emplacement Creation Device (SPFECD)."
The reasons are
- Designed around people that might not be familiar with culture, like any (full on 0 social exposure). Basically a person who has scholar skills, can read, understand and read between intentions of words. But anything that's common word or culturally known as is avoided like the plague.
- NATO compliance, any nation who bases its doctrine around cooperation with this need to have a copy in their language, some words dont have a translation and coming up with words that follow rule 1 in their language is just a lot of hassle. Keeping to basic "root" words, translation easy.
-No misunderstandings, they make sure that each sentence, and word doesn't have any double meaning. Eliminates confusion by giving a very aggressively specific way of wording something.
Basically it follows the same layout as laws and statues do, overly specific, so much that it becomes a chore to read. But it eliminates any responsibility by the author of those works.
In reality its very much KISS design but they switch the commonly used words with hyper exact ones.
Also the reason why they sound weird, because they are not talking to you, the word garble you read is specifically designed in ways to prioritize, first mention important, then details of that important, do not start mentioning other thing until first thing, which important is fully contextualized. Then the second one, then the third one, etc.
You use a version of Arma for this right? I recognize it anywhere,
Sort of. It's VBS3. They're similar
Hvala dzstduet
Very nice demo. What would be REALLY cool would be throwing these hypothetical/new weapon systems into a game like Squad or Arma III and see how players use them. Could get some interesting insight before any time and money is spent building them.
The program these visuals are from is the military version of Arma. Believe me when I say they already have.
Additionally, Arma groups are too small to really have a lot of this stuff become a factor, this from a guy who plays platoon sized operations in Arma 3 every other week. You need to go to at least battalion level for most of this to be remotely relevant.
@@EvilTwinn ruclips.net/video/KhVbr0OyAOE/видео.html
@@EvilTwinn Very interesting. I think perhaps the Army should invest more in that kind of virtual training for actual personnel. Would kill two birds with one stone! As a member of the Army, I've always thought realistic FPS games like those I mentioned would be extremely effective training for certain aspects, namely communication and tactics. It'd basically be the equivalent of a flight sim like pilots use.
@@gardnert1 Yeah, virtual training is undoubtedly the way of the future, the problem is coming up with ways for it to be as relevant for the infantryman as they want it to be and as economical as they'd like. Perhaps VR headsets can help with that at some point.
@@gardnert1 I mean, you are already seeing it. It's VBS 3, a "training simulator" built on top of the engine (Real Virtuality 3) that runs ArmA 2 (last time I checked anyway). One of the problem is that up until recent versions of ArmA3 (Real Virtuality 4), the control scheme is really clunky. Hell, even with improvement in controls and animations, it's still pretty awful. And I doubt "they" have backported the improvements back to VBS 3, given that BIS and BISim have officially separated. And because all o this training is obviously done on government computers, you can't have Joe messing around with settings, which means they are stuck with (I kid you not) controls and animations inherited straight from 2001.
So what will end up happening is that you are forcing bunch of Joes to play a "video game" that has crap graphics, clunky animation that gets in the way (e.g. your virtual avatar insists on walking forward while throwing grenade because the walking animation doesn't stop even after you stopped pressing the forward key), awful control scheme that they are not familiar with, all while going through a scenario that is completely divorced from reality. The Joes will not care and get hemmed up, and entire training day was wasted.
And at the end of the day, they'll go back to their barracks and play the newest version of Call of Battlefield Honor with fancy graphics, silky smooth animations and controls. And maybe, just maybe, some of them are motivated enough to play ArmA 3 (which has relatively modern graphics, animations, and controls) with a few realism mods (e.g. ACE3, ACRE2) with similarly motivated people online (whom may or may not even be in the military), and unironically get better training from that than whatever VBS 3 could offer.
Let's not even mention "America's Army", which was another can of worms lol.
This is arma right?
ruclips.net/video/KhVbr0OyAOE/видео.html
So the "enemy" doesnt have support battalions, artillery, drones, arial support, proper counterattack etc. Yeah you should have added nuclear strike in attacking force arsenal too since its so much fantasy
Yeah this is a brigade vs a batallion, for some reason? And the brigade has plenty of armor (despite being air-dropped nearby) but the "home team" doesn't have so much as a single tank? It's nonsense, may as well show a tiger beating up a puppy
Aren't those French army at 0:43?
Send some
To the anchorage units please
ruclips.net/video/KhVbr0OyAOE/видео.html
versatility & survivability of ground elements of IBCT are of paramount importance!!! especially the tactical capabilities in a unified network centric warfare!!! JLTV ain't suitable for this scenario!!! rather the AM GENERAL BRV-O® i-HYBRID 4WD + 5.0 in. Lift 6.3 TDI V8 / 90.0 kWh E-DRIVE 4-Dr Armoured Infantry Scout Vehicle (LHD) is a more appropriate ground mobility asset!!! armed with roof mounted 23 MM GAU-23/E rotary cannon & .50 Cal on a standard issue RWS, it could be absolutely lethal on the enemy!!!
THX the video! Which program was used to create the animations?
VBS (Virtual Battlespace), you might be familiar with Bohemia Interactive's Armed Assault series of games this is based on.
Cool! No one ever shoots back.
I love this game
I'll be 16 Year in by then & more settle in a SBCT then a IBCT too
They forgot to show cases of beer being dropped for the troops.
Why you need MPF with the IBCT when you have Stryker IBCT?
To give the light formations more punch
@@seanmac1793 That's why we have Stryker brigade combat teams. Strykers can be equipped with 30mm cannon or the 105mm cannon. I have seen them in action in Iraq.
@@ht-sneakers80 because there are different standards for strategic airlift time and requirements. I can't remenber the exact numbers but IBCT supposed to a faster call in with less restrictions on airfield size
@@ht-sneakers80 105mm has be retired.
And this is Light Infantry with only a single Bn of tracks.
So much more strategicly mobile.
Looking forward to what the US Army sees as the future for ABCTs, another video/O&O coming soon?
ruclips.net/video/KhVbr0OyAOE/видео.html
The ISV sure looks a lot like a puma…
Cool!!!
nice!!!
I knew something seemed off by the video's picture, looks like fucking Arma...
That 'IBCT' seems to have quite a bit of heavy armor...
That’s what I’m saying, that’s why the Army created the Stryker BCT to fill in the gap between a light infantry regiment and a armored regiment. Stryker = Fast mobile & a little fire power.
One company of Mobile protected firepower 14 light tanks . For direct fire support to the Infantry. Not meant to go toe to toe with T-80s, 90s etc. Army selected GDLS MPF and is designated the M10 Booker. Given a long drawn out slugfest with Russia, China, Iran, Norks- take your pick of combos, the Army should also get the M8 Buford Armored gun system/ MPF, light tanks .
You don't mix tracked vehicles with light forces no matter how 'light' they are. You're either light or heavy.
That is the whole point of having mpf its a light tank like the old sheridans
@@coreyjacobs2718 not c130 transportable, not air droppable, not sling loadable, not amphibious, so all of the fights it can get to, you could bring actual tanks.
@@username_3715 False, you can air transport 2 of them on a c130. It's the "General Dynamics Griffin II" that was selected as the new light tank MPF. It's 38 tons unlike the Abrams which is much heavier. The Army will have about 100 of them by the end of next year (end of 2023).
@@Knight_Kin you can fit 2 on a c 17. a c130 cantfit these or take off even if it could, their max load is like 20 tons.
They can mix it, but when thick MUD says no, they are either splitting or become stationary targets.
What about the enemy's mines and tanks? Not realistic
The idea would be that those are taken care of by the airforce this would be mop up
oh boy oh boy a trolling we a going 🤜🏽🤛🏽
This would be appreciated to see in total war 🤷🏽♂️😂. Otherwise it looks cool
Hold up that thumbnail is from arma 3
Ok what the fuck is on the back deck of the light tank? That black R2-D2 looking thing? Anyone?
No idea, it's not on the real deal Griffin II tank.
Radar / BLUFOR tracking / datalink shit.
Whoever designed it is probably not an actual engineer although, shit looks HALO and ass to transport / maintain. Also limiting the 360 turn for something that could've been put to a location where it doesnt affect it.
The entire approach is a HUGE grain of salt.
Only takeaway from the video is probably the approach and methods of working the problem, not the gear or vehicles.
No Armor or Weapons.... sounds like a great idea
It's literally a Stryker BCT but with pickup trucks and shitty expensive, "assault rifles" that are really just battle rifles, thus throwing away everything that we've learned from decades of combat experience: "precision fire is a meme. Suppression fire wins the day, every day." I'll take my Stryker that can transport my squad WITH armor and firepower over fucking pickup trucks and MRAPs that flip over going offroad with horrible troop dismount ratios please. Thanks a lot military industrial complex for making even more useless shit we don't need for 4x the price it should be.
Apparently, the Standard Division, Heavy will have Stryker BCTs and the Standard Divsion, Light is leg infantry with motorized transport. Evidently, they won't fight from the ISVs, but will dismount short of the objective to advance on foot. Now, whether that will happen in actual pratice, is something I doubt.
5:10 is this Arma ???
VBS (Virtual Battlespace), the military version of the software based on Armed Assault.
why not just use Arma III for these videos, it'd turn out so much better
You lost me at the force landing at a nearby runway… not happening against near peer
like and subscribe if you're using SA-4s in 2024! XD
And yet none of this has been practiced in the field. Still stuck on insurgent doctrine, with a static FLOT.
What is it with the Army’s word salads now. “Multi domain omni directional confrontation” yeah? You mean a front, like in every war ever? We aren’t the first batch to use and fight in land, sea, air and orbit.
“Multi role stealth” yeah holy shit its like you can use something for multiple purposes.
“Tactical mobility”… you mean menuevering??
“Combat variance” oh ok so the standard issue unit.
Like holy shit guys… officers try not souping up the English language for another medal
China: we copy that..
To anybody watching that thinks about joining if your qualified just do it . This video is all non sense you most likely won't get to do any of these cool things in the video and might be sent to war with a broken weapon and have to buy your own sling with your own money. The reason is you will get to do stuff not in the video that will stay with you for your life . Also you get to retire at 20 years with a pension at 39 years old .
-"Your injuries are not service related"
-"WHAT? I CANT HEAR YOU!"
@@shotya9403 even if they are you still have to fight them for the Money you will get it . I'm still rich just because I have free healthcare for life and it probably saved my life already. If I had normal healthcare I would still be scared to go to the doctor and most likely dying of Cancer.
@@DrDabb47 Many veterans who got out just get simply ditched, become homeless. It does suck that many people who served their country end up in such a bad state.
Im glad that some are able to benefit from it and actually get the benefits they are entitled to, but still many end up in shit situations when they leave the army.
@@shotya9403 I'm realistic when I talk to people about joining the military. Most people would benefit if they are qualified . Im still fighting for my full compensation but the healthcare thing is a big deal when u have to use it .
@@DrDabb47 Being realistic is way better than telling the fairy tale of COD IRL
The MPF looks like a Panther...
Literally ARMA 1 lol
None of this gear will make any difference if we keep doing the fighting an unwinnable war thing people won't keep enlisting for that shit either by the way
Looks like they're fighting the Chinese 😂😂😂 Taiwan conflict maybe????
Your PID is terrible
Thats soviet equipment, literally SSH helmets and cold war weapons
The camo is something along the lines of a VSR variant.
The army intentionally uses them, since its the definite most basic ass conventional force that countries evolved from.
Mts mogu i kakvisufuj al stazio i eho itd hihihi
the camouflage of enemy soldiers is chinese and tanks are russian. lol. copy that.
No it's not, that's russian Flora or VSR one of the two from the 80s
@@TheSynchronizer copy that
Bro if you think Cav scouts are going to ride in that death box you're high.
WTF is that thing? StrykerX and StrykerX dragoon > LRV GTFO of here with that nonsense.
first,nice video
ruclips.net/video/KhVbr0OyAOE/видео.html
New COD looks like crap
Certified “meh”
Uninteresting and out of touch