Alhamdulillah mashallah Allah hu akbar alhamdulillah mashallah wonderful video may Allah SWT guide all of us on the straight path always amen❤ love from India🇮🇳 may Allah SWT bless you my dear dr zakir naik and your family👪
He is liar 🤥😂brother... I can expose his lies... Surah 2:234 n 2:240..see how God changes his mind within days 😂😂😂... And he lied by saying Quran says moon has derived light💡.. But there is nothing like that..
The scriptures which was revealed earlier was given to that time for that people, and finally when it was the correct time to reveal the last and final revelation that will be there until the day of judgement for whole of humanity, Allah revealed it to prophet Muhammed (peace be upon him). Allah did not cancel out all the earlier revelations, he either keeps it or advances it or removes it whichever is best for the people, if you go and check the bible and the torah there are verses which are similar to the Quran, we Muslims alhamdulillah follow them, don't know if those people follow it. Do you think that people had same tolerance, thinking and mindset thousands of years ago? That's why the previous revelations were either kept, advanced or removed by Allah, and made the The Quran the final Book until the Day of Judgement for the whole of humanity.
OK explanation, but it has a flaw. a Muslim must never say that only the last ayat made alcohol HARAAM. as every single ayat before the last said indirectly that alcohol is haraam. plz read them again with understanding an ul see. also, wats dangerous about saying alcohol was "halaal" before the last ayat of the Quran on the subject, is that in the previous scriptures the information of alcohol was already made Haraam by Allah. in proverbs suliman said. .. "wine is a mocker & strong drink is raging, so the wise must stay away from it". so when a Muslim says... alcohol was made Haraam only at the last verse in the Quran, a Christian can say... well our jahova is wiser that ur Allah because he already made alcohol haraam 2000 years before ur Allah. naozubillah. wat we must understand is Allah had Already pronounced on this, but because the ppl fell back into missguidance & corrupted most of the book Allah sent the last book wit the wisdom of not just "do this" or "don't to that" but with a rehabilitative nature. so every verse pointed towards alcohol being haraam & the last verse said plainly it is forbidden. just think... a man loves a woman, she tells him that in alcohol the harm outways the benefit then she tells him dont come to look for me if u drink. if the man is sincere & really loves & understands her he will want to stop drinking as he will want to see her all the time. also, if alcohol was halaal before the last ayat why didn't the prophet himself drink?? those who was waiting on a last & final ayat could have just looked an saw that muhammad pbuh in his dignified way never drank alcohol. but ppl always need a "clear/direct word" & would make excuses in not reflecting on the early ayats to so as to hide behind vails of ignorance. but Allah wanted them to think for themselves & parables is the best way to develop a sound mind. imaam ibrahiym ghany from trinidad.
swiftspy Calling abrogation clarification (no matter how different 2 verses may be) does not solve the matter. It is just blindly accepting you guru's teaching. If a new law comes telling you to pursue and even destroy someone comes along it does not just clarify an earlier one telling you to, "live at peace with and even defer to the teachings" of that someone, it annuls the previous law - which in legal terms is to 'Abrogate' it. Please do not just accept the excuse saying this is clarification no matter how different the outcomes are - The eternal God does not change His mind between Mecca and Medina.
+eric bantona Islam in the second passage is not referring to the way muslim apply Islam. Islam asks you, and all prophets, to believe in one creator and worship HIM alone.
If all that you say he is true Dr. Zakir Naik then with due respect let me point out some seemingly inconsistent parts. 1.S 2: 256 talks of no compulsion in religion......but 2. S 9:5 talks of "kill the polytheists....sit and wait in ambush.... 3. S9:73 talks of Fighting disbelievers. Compare these with surah 2:256 and you will see abrogation. If the text was handed down then how is it that one part talks of freedom of religion and the other talks of killing and fighting? These are just a few of the direct contradictions in SENSE and so they are contradictions in fact. Now look to your respectful Imam Ibn Bez and see what he frankly and truthfully stated about abrogation without mincing his words. Please see it for yourself. The searching masses look to you and some others for a truthful explanation and they are often disappointed because of your familiar use of Taqyiyyah (lying in the defence of the religion) Nobody wants lies. They are in search of the truth. In any event why should we lie to defend a truth?
Ebeer Can you be any stupider? The Quran is talking about religious scripture, not your science book. This proves me why you are so dumb and close minded that you can’t get a simple message then how are you gonna get an important point? Lol, you are talking about 6th grade but I guess you need to Pass 1st grade
Lazylads muhmmad was an uneducated thief, liar and the best deceiver in the known human history. www.google.co.in/amp/s/maria911.wordpress.com/2009/09/13/192/amp/
So there is no contradiction in the Qur'an because the Qur'an says so, and that must be true because it says it is the clear truth, and that must be so since otherwise there would be a contradiction, but that's impossible as it says there is no contradiction. Muslims, Naik's brain is wired in circles. The above is called circular reasoning and that's accepted only by idiots. There are lots of clear contradictions in the Qur'an, which is why Muhammad stuck in the 2:106 verse that insults all but an idiot's intelligence. Hence, Q 4:82 says in effect that the book you are reading surly is not from Allah (unless you accept circular reasoning).
no verse of the Quran is abrogated but the Quran abrogated the previous books. the Quran has a rehabilitative nature & gradually reforms as an egg hatches into a caterpillar then to a cocoon then a butterfly. such is the wisdom of Allah. with humans a person who became a butterfly can fall back to a caterpillar as faith sometimes raises and falls. the rehabilitative nature of the Quran caters for fluctuations of faith.
abrogation has to do with canceling of previous was revealed and replacing of it with new one...so it has not to do with contradiction ....it has to do with reliability of the given revelation - action ....reliability is not reached
What do you und by the words there would have been in it many contradictions?😅😅😅 It never ever said there would have been in it NO contradictions.? There are so many contradictions inside your Quran 😅😅😅
So which punishment u will go.. Stoning them to death or closing in room ?? 😂😂😂 if she comits adultery divorce her.. Y u killing her??? Allah will punish.. This simply means Quran isn't from Allah at all thanks 🙏
i differ zakir naik here for defending Rajam (Stone to Death ) a fabricated Hadith !! 1. Exemplary Verses are not relevant to Abrogation at all . 2. Abrogation mean simply revealing something Better or Similar to its previous verse . OR more refined and simplified or in detail as compare to the previous verse. 3. word Nasakh / Abrogate is described in Quran only once in 2:106 4. actual issue was "Ra'ina " 2:104 "O you who believe! Say not (to the Messenger Peace be upon him ) Ra'ina but say Unzurna (Do make us understand) and hear. And for the disbelievers there is a painful torment. whereas in 4:46 Allah describes same issue but says " it would have been better for them not to Utter " Ra'ina" . verse 2:104 is more Better , Simplified and Direct prohibition Order of NOT UTTERING the word "Ra'ina" 4:46 "Among those who are Jews, there are some who displace words from (their) right places and say: "We hear your word (O Muhammad SAW ) and disobey," and "Hear and let you (O Muhammad SAW) hear nothing." And Ra'ina with a twist of their tongues and as a mockery of the religion (Islam). And if only they had said: "We hear and obey", and "Do make us understand," it would have been better for them, and more proper, but Allah has cursed them for their disbelief, so they believe not except a few. Conclusion : verse 4:46 is abrogated by more simplified and direct order of prohibition in verse 2:104. whereas 2:106 is simply describes such methodology of abrogation. Rajam / Stone to death is not the part of Quran also Rajam ahadit contradicts with the Quran clearly. punishment for fornicator is 100 lashes , married or unmarried is neither described nor its issue of Quran. 1. Quran simply says 100 lashes for fornicator 24:2 Mullah always interprets Quran in the light of hadith , Zakir is doing same thing , he is defending Stone to death hadith therefore changing the meaning of Quran. 2. just in next verse 24:3 Quran says " Fornicator does not marry except fornicator or polytheist....." by common sense , if a fornicator is no more on earth , who this decree is revealed for ?!! ... fornicator does not marry ... " simply mean he is alive , he is not dead , he or she is not punished stone to death. 3. punishment for married slave women is half then free married women 4:25 [ Pickthal , Yusuf Ali , Shakir , Dr. Ghali translations ] , Now what would be the half punishment of STONE TO DEATH ???!!! Analyzing Immorality and Fornication in QURAN ! 17:32 "And do not approach unlawful sexual intercourse. Indeed, it is ever an immorality and is evil as a way." in 17:32 Fahasha/Immorality is described in General in which zina/Fornication is also included BUT Quran specifically separates the Zina/Fornication from Fahasha/immorality when it implements the Penalty/punishments. Since Allah is Most Just , He describes the punishment according to the level of crime. 4:15-4:35 : a. confine them in houses, b. if Allah gives them another chance to live normal life dont confine them. c. refuse to share their beds, d.beat them (lightly), e.but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance). Conclusion: Nothing is Abrogated regarding to the Punishments of Fahasha/Immorality and Zina/fornication. May Allah bless us Hidayat to follow QURAN , Ameen !
+Abdullah Haq No there is another verse : 16:101 confirms there is abrogation in the koran .. it says there is abrogation because allah know best and calls us ignorant ! ... how can you take this stuff seriously ? .. there are other religions you could try
+Ade Fegan Brother there is no compulsion in ISLAM , if you want to practice another religion you can no problem at all :) , its upto you which path do you choose ! there are only two kinds of Abrogation in Quran 1. Verse of Quran Abrogates another verse of Quran , e.g 2:104 abrogates the verse 4:46. Note: both verse are present there in the Quran. Allah does not Delete the verse from Quran at all. 2. Verse of Quran Abrogates another verse of Previous Book . in this regard verse 16:101 says "And when We substitute a verse in place of a verse - and Allah is most knowing of what He sends down - they say, " You, [O Muhammad], are but an inventor [of lies]."But most of them do not know." Abrogated verse of previous book 6:146 "And to those who are Jews We prohibited every animal of undivided hoof; and of the cattle and the sheep We prohibited to them their fat, except what adheres to their backs or the entrails or what is joined with bone. [By] that We repaid them for their injustice. And indeed, We are truthful. Leviticus 11:4 ".....The camel, though it chews the cud, does not have a divided hoof; it is ceremonially unclean for you." Leviticus 7:22-27 The Lord said to Moses,“Say to the Israelites: ‘Do not eat any of the fat of cattle, sheep or goats. Now read the verse which abrogates the 6:146 16:115 "He has only forbidden to you dead animals, blood, the flesh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah . But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit] - then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. Allah does not call you ignorant , Allah says "..but most of them don't know " why do you count yourself among those who dont know :) May Allah bless us Peace ! Ameen !
+Abdullah Haq there are other ways for us to be good people none of which involve the controversy which typifies islam .. let's try another way brother
+Abdullah Haq that is nice, but sadly islam is strongly associated with harming other souls and what is written in the koran does not offer any comfort to anyone who seeks assurances that this is not the case .. perhaps what is written in the koran will cause the downfall of islam
***** how can something that is "eternally true," and was supposedly existing WITH Allah for all eternity be contextual? The "truth" of the Quran shouldn't be circumstantial, if it is what HAS existed for all eternity. Here is what actually happened with the evolution of the Quran, since its doctrines CHANGE from one time to another. It is known which verses were "revealed" in Mecca, from those which were "given" in Medina, and the message clearly changes FROM one of tolerance and respect for "disbelievers," to one of intolerance and utter disdain after his move to Medina. This can be illustrated in numerous instances, such as a Muslim's attitude towards those who "disbelieve." Verses 23:117 and 98:6 say that unbelievers will not prosper and are the worst of creatures. Verse 9:29 also asks believers to fight those who do not believe in Allah, the Last Day, His rules and His religion of truth. But verse 45:14 says otherwise: "Tell those who believe, to forgive those who do not hope for the Days of Allah; It is for Him to recompense (for good or evil) each people according to what they have earned" Also: Indeed, Allah is with those who fear Him and those who are doers of good. 16:128 And, what about the Muslim's attitude towards Jews and Christians? We believe in Allah, and in what has been revealed to us and what was revealed to Abraham, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and in (the Books) given to Moses, Jesus, and the Prophets, from their Lord: We make no distinction between one and another among them. 3:84 This was obviously given for a certain "circumstance," and yet, it is completely contradicted by this: Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled. 9:29 (Is it not interesting that this verse suggests that Allah made certain things unlawful ALONG WITH "His Messenger." Is that not SHIRK? Is not "His Messenger" (Muhammad) a partner with Allah here?) Clearly, there are verses in the Quran which make moot of others, because of obvious contradiction--which made abrogation (because Allah is all-powerful, and can make something MORE true than something that he "revealed" earlier--even though BOTH are "eternally true") necessary.
He substituted the previous revelations. Not the quran read the verse again. Example stoning was in the Torah but now in the quran it is flogging... he said to replace with something better...
John Beam you mis understood.... nothing in the quran has been replaced... the previous revelations of the Torah,psalms,and gospel has been replaced by the quran.
Phillip Taalib Williams So says ONE MAN. You call him a "prophet," and you believe that he is, because he said so, and also, it says so in a document that came from the SAME MAN'S MIND. Really, it's the witness of ONE MAN, and the nimrods who believed in that one man. If the case you state were to be taken to a court of law (not a shariah court), it would be thrown out for lack of evidence.
This man is just refusing to accept the obvious. If one verse says 'live in peace with the people of the book' and another verse says 'pursue them and destroy them' there is a plain contradiction. Does God really say live in peace with them until you're strong enough to murder them and then it is okay to wage war as you like? Is that God speaking or is it a man who can't be trusted? It is interest to note however that this speaker talks not about alcohol alone in the beginning but about all intoxicants - but we find Islamic communities that would attack people for making alcohol but seem fine with others producing heroine, etc.
U THINK U ARE CLEVER THERE IS NO CONTRADICTION HERE . QURAN 2V189-193 SAYS 189 وَقاتِلوا في سَبيلِ اللَّهِ الَّذينَ يُقاتِلونَكُم وَلا تَعتَدوا ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لا يُحِبُّ المُعتَدينَ Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress. Indeed Allah does not like transgressors. 190 وَاقتُلوهُم حَيثُ ثَقِفتُموهُم وَأَخرِجوهُم مِن حَيثُ أَخرَجوكُم ۚ وَالفِتنَةُ أَشَدُّ مِنَ القَتلِ ۚ وَلا تُقاتِلوهُم عِندَ المَسجِدِ الحَرامِ حَتّىٰ يُقاتِلوكُم فيهِ ۖ فَإِن قاتَلوكُم فَاقتُلوهُم ۗ كَذٰلِكَ جَزاءُ الكافِرينَ And kill them wherever you confront them, and expel them from where they expelled you, for faithlessness1 is graver than killing. But do not fight them near the Holy Mosque unless they fight you therein; but if they fight you, kill them; such is the requital of the faithless. Or ‘polytheism.’ 191 فَإِنِ انتَهَوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفورٌ رَحيمٌ But if they relinquish,1 then Allah is indeed all-forgiving, all-merciful. That is, if they give up idolatry. 192 وَقاتِلوهُم حَتّىٰ لا تَكونَ فِتنَةٌ وَيَكونَ الدّينُ لِلَّهِ ۖ فَإِنِ انتَهَوا فَلا عُدوانَ إِلّا عَلَى الظّالِمينَ Fight them until faithlessness1 is no more, and religion becomes [exclusively] for Allah. Then if they relinquish, there shall be no reprisal except against the wrongdoers. 193 الشَّهرُ الحَرامُ بِالشَّهرِ الحَرامِ وَالحُرُماتُ قِصاصٌ ۚ فَمَنِ اعتَدىٰ عَلَيكُم فَاعتَدوا عَلَيهِ بِمِثلِ مَا اعتَدىٰ عَلَيكُم ۚ وَاتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَاعلَموا أَنَّ اللَّهَ مَعَ المُتَّقينَ A sacred month for a sacred month, and all sanctities require retribution. So should anyone aggress against you, assail him in the manner he assailed you,1 and be wary of Allah, and know that Allah is with the Godwary.
TomFielding, its not contradict at all, bcause that verses you talked about, one verses is when its in peace, and the other is about defending yourself when you were attacked and expelled from your own land. its really2 make sense, just read the Quran yourself, dont read it from islamophobic website crap
Just your brain and know that Creator-GOD'S words can't be contradictions. Satanic Human's words contradicts every minute. Law of the land claims to believe in peace, democracy and pluralism yet the Prisons are full of Black people, many are innocents and some are criminals. Meaning 2 kinds of law? Right? To understand GOD'S Revelation yu first need to accept HIM. /A convert to Islam..
Ok then if that's not the contradiction then the word contradiction doesn't exist in dictionary 😂😂.... Okay now check surah 2:234 widow women should remain in house fr 4 moths... Surah 2:240 window women should remain fr 1 year in house.. 😂😂😂how Allah changed his words in just continue verses within days he changed his mind... Your Allah hv no knowledge wht will happen in future??? Is this verse good or not... So simple is that it's not word of God rather rules of Mohammed himself nd Constitution made by human keeps on Amending.. Nd even after editing Quran from abu baker to uthman to 1924 Cairo edition it still has mistakes n contradiction😂
Read those verses again. 2:234 And those who are taken in death among you and leave wives behind - they, [the wives, shall] wait four months and ten [days]. And when they have fulfilled their term, then there is no blame upon you for what they do with themselves in an acceptable manner. And Allah is [fully] Acquainted with what you do. 2:240 And those who are taken in death among you and leave wives behind - for their wives is a bequest: maintenance for one year without turning [them] out. But if they leave [of their own accord], then there is no blame upon you for what they do with themselves in an acceptable way. And Allah is Exalted in Might and Wise. Explanation: 234 verse explains iddah period. For which a women doesn't necessarily need to be in her late or ex husband's house.. Verse 240 applies only to a woman whose husband died. But before dying he allowed woman to stay in his home for 1 year i.e. in a wasiyat or death note.
@@vikasthakur3066 Escaping? Do you think answer to such complex questions can be given in one line. I shared the article with you so you can understand the iddah topic in detail. The iddah is a waiting period that a Muslim woman observes after the death of her husband or after a divorce. After iddah period, a women is free to marry any other man. In case of divorce,it is about 3 months( Quran 2:228). In case of husband's death it is 4 months 10 days( Quran 2:234). The 1 year in verse 2:240 is not iddah period. It is related to inheritance (another topic). That's why i shared with you the article for your better understanding. If you want to learn anything about the Quran, you should refer to a Tafseer Book as well as Translation. There's a context behind every verse. To understand that context, you have to learn about when,where and in which circumstances the verse was revealed. Then you will be able to truly understand the meaning of Quran.
Mr. Zakir, the Quaran that is in your hand is not Allah verses neither it is the same as Muhammad was preached to his follower, is it ? it is written 20 years after the death of Mohhamad by memorizing it . and if it is true then how a ordinary people explain the almighty Allah verses and time to time substituted, means then it is not Allah word then.
WHERE DID U GUET THIS INFORMATION THAT QURAN WAS WRITTEN 20 YEARS AFTER THE DEATH OF THE PROPHET MOHAMED PBUH ? WHY U HAVE TO LIE BE HONEST ,SPEAK THE TRUTH OR IF U DONT KNOW ANYTHING ASK FOR . Usman compiled the Quran NOT WRITTEN this is so beautifull preseved quran ,kalifa othman has combined the quran in to a book,instead of being in seperate pages,so it wont be lost and its allahs will,its always been the same quran and preserved till today .allah said in the quran we have bring down the quran zikir and we are to preserve it,just looking at this quran its a miracle,ALLAHO AKBAR AND NOT ANLY THAT THE QURAN WAS MEMORIZED TO If all copies of the Holy Qur'an were thrown into the oceans we don't worry a bit as the whole Holy Qur'an was and is fully memorized in the minds and hearts of so many of us Muslims since revealation and passed on to us by our forefathers. Allah Akbar.
I have watched some of Dr Naik's videos, and as usual he is twisting the answers. One of the video he can not see anything wrong in a man of 53 having sex with a girl of 6 years, as long as the girl and Muhammad agrees to the marriage. "Who are we to say No If the prophet and the young girl agrees" So if a man is 70 years old and see a child of 4 years "Would you like to marry me" the naive and immature girl says " Yes" without realizing what a marriage is? Dr. Zaik you are making a fool of yourself. One thing good as come out after 9/11 is that it has put Islam in the spotlight, Western scholars are reading and learning Arabic and exposing some of the things in the Quran and Hadith which I believe is totally unacceptable .
Boxtop Letter "One of the video he can not see anything wrong in a man of 53 having sex with a girl of 6 years, as long as the girl and Muhammad agrees to the marriage. "Who are we to say No If the prophet and the young girl agrees" " A of 9 years ( although Muhammad ans Aisha got engage when she was 6 years old but the marriage was consummated when she was 9 years. Just wanted to correct this before somebody jump on this error.
Boxtop Letter Right. I mean U guys have sex with random boys and girls the whole year. that's not a problem. And a 53 years old man have sex with his wife (no matter what her age is) and U r behaving like Albert Einstein. Tell me more. :D :D :D :p :p :p Btw, Aisha loved Muhammad (pbuh) more than anyone else and she reached her puberty already when they had sex. When She herself didn't complain about him, brother, who the hell on earth are u to complain? Dont u think u r being nosy? u r welcome.
+Boxtop Letter he married her when she was six .. she says in the koran that they had sex from when she was 9 (there are several references to this) ... the (poxy) koran states that a girl should be able to take the mans weight before having sex with him
+raqeeb tushar Nosey ? .. you have got a nerve .. She was NINE YEARS OLD when he raped her .. disobedience would have been punished SO WHY WOULD SHE COMPLAIN ?
Ade Fegan if u do your research then u will know that he married aisha at 6 but he never touched her until her puberty. And its scientifically proved that women from that time specially in desert area used to reach puberty at early age. So do your research first. And u r complaining, Aisha never complained about the Prophet. She is the one who praised him the most. So what's your problem?? Marriage that time like this was normal. So you dont problem with one boy and a girl who are not husband and wife having sex with each other, but u have a problem when a man marries a girl at early age. SHE WAS HIS WIFE. she was an adult like i said. Do your research on PUBERTY MATE. If you are comparing this soceity with that one then u r the fool here. That time Women were BURRIED ALIVE...Get it??? If he didnt took the responsibilities of those then they would be dead. DO u even know that Muhammad (pbuh)'s wives were divorcees and widows?? Only Aisha was the one who was not a widow or a divorcee. As for the answer to your question about her age, In Islam it is said a girl can marry when she reaches maturity, when she reaches menstruation. In Country to country things like this differ. The reasons are climate, area, her food and lifestyle etc and other things. For example today in india, the girl should be 18 to get married, in america most of the state says 16, in texas the girl can marry in the age of 14. If u research history u will see even Roman Emperors married girls as young as 8, The minimum age for marriage in the US-State of Delaware in year 1880 was 7 . So Y 7 here??? Brother, it depends on the climate, area, growth etc. in islam u can marry a girl if she reaches adulthood. And then again use a common sense here. Mother Aisha never complained about the prophet, if he did injustice to her then she would be saying "oh my god, he's this and that..." but she is the one that praised him much, more than any other wives.
Islam is true? Muhammad declared that he was told this by the Angel Gabriel so obviously Mohamed was a false prophet since we absolutely know this is a false statement: “As for the resemblance of the child to its parents; if a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets a discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets her discharge first, the child will resemble her.” Vol. 4, Bk. 55, No. 546
Zakir lying *Again*The Quran has been altered and has 7 versions:Stressing the perfection, flawlessness and unchanged, unaltered nature of the Quran is perhaps the single most important assertion for those engaging in ‘Da’wah’, or Islamic prosletysation.The problem is, it’s simply untrue.Of course if you are a believing Muslim you have to believe that the Angel Gabriel recited words directly from Allah into Muhammad’s ear and that the current form of the Quran is word for word the same as each word recited by Allah through the Angel Gabriel into Muhammad’s ear.The facts, of course, are different.The Quran has been altered. The Quran has been changed.There are multiple ways of demonstrating this, even through using primary Islamic religious texts:(1) Firstly it is important to remember that the Quran was never actually written down into any single book during Muhammad's life. It was always recited. (2) Even during the period before it was written down, there is some evidence that the Quran was changed by Muhammad himself. According to Ibn Ishaq, the earliest source on the life of Muhammad, there was an additional verse in Surah an-Najm that Muhammad later removed, saying that Satan had tricked him into believing it was from God. The verse is commonly referred to as verse 20.5, because it was supposed to fit between 20 and 21. It is also knowns as the "Satanic Verse" The verse went like this:19: Have ye thought upon Al-Lat and Al-‘Uzzá20: and Manāt, the third, the other?20.5: These are the exalted gharāniq, whose intercession is hoped for.Later Islamic scholars came to deny that this ever happened. But it seems to me that the reasoning behind denying the veracity of this event has nothing to do with scholarly skepticism and everything to do with the dangers of the theological repercussions of accepting the veracity of this. After all, if Satan had tricked Muhammad into believing that this verse was from God, then how can we be certain that all the other verses of the Quran are from God and not from Satan? Also the idea that Muhammad could be tricked by Satan, even for a short time, flies in the face of the notion that Muhammad is the perfect man. From a non-religious perspective, the acceptance of the three traditional Pagan Goddesses into Islam makes sense when Muhammad was weak and needed reconciliation with the Pagans, and the removal of this verse later when he was stronger and no longer needed their support makes a lot of sense, for that reason I do not doubt the veracity of the event so much.Of course when you bring this up in a discussion, it is likely to cause anger and outrage among some Muslims, who will often deny that this event occurred, and will even assert that Ibn Ishaq was a liar or something along those lines.This is often one of the major problems of trying to debate with some Muslims over the veracity of the Quran. Many will assert that the Quran has never been altered, and when proof from the earliest Islamic sources themselves is shown that plainly states that Muhammad himself altered parts of the Quran, those Muslims will often become outraged and refuse to discuss any further.(3) There are some Hadiths that claim that portions of the Quran are lost because the only written parts of it were eaten by a sheep or a goat (depending on translation):Reported ‘Aisha (RA):‘the verse of stoning and of suckling an adult ten times was revealed, and they were (written) on a paper and kept under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) expired and we were occupied by his death, a goat entered and ate away the paper.’ (Sunan Ibn Majah, Hadith 1944) (Hasan)(4) There is a whole doctrine of Naskh, or "abrogation" in Islam. This is the notion that many verses in the Quran are lost and many others have been abrogated by later verses and should no longer be considered. According to Burton in the Encyclopaedia of Islam and the book "Islamic Theories of Abrogation", 564 verses were alleged to have been expunged from the mushaf (Quran), or 1/11th of its total content.(5) According to the traditional Islamic narrative, the Quran was standardized into a single, authorative text for the first time by Caliph Uthman about 30 years after Muhammad died. The way this was done was that Uthman collected all manuscripts of the Quran that had been written down by various people across the Empire, he then selected the "authentic" ones and burned all variant readings. Here is the Hadith in Bukhari that describes this:Bukhari: vol. 6, hadith 510, pp. 478-479; book 61Narrated Anas bin Malik:Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and the Christians did before." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. 'Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, "In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur'an, then write it in the dialect of Quraish, the Qur'an was revealed in their tongue." They did so, and when they had written many copies, 'Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. 'Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt. Said bin Thabit added, "A Verse from Surat Ahzab was missed by me when we copied the Qur'an and I used to hear Allah's Apostle reciting it. So we searched for it and found it with Khuzaima bin Thabit Al-Ansari. (That Verse was): 'Among the Believers are men who have been true in their covenant with Allah.' (33.23)In total there were seven different versions of the Quran according to this Hadith:Al-Muwatta Hadith Hadith 15.5 About the Qur'anYahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Urwa ibn az-Zubayr that Abd ar-Rahman ibn Abd al-Qari said that he had heard Umar ibn al-Khattab say, "I heard Hisham ibn Hakim ibn Hizam reciting Surat al-Furqan (Sura 25) differently from me, and it was the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, who had recited it to me. I was about to rush up to him but I granted him a respite until he had finished his prayer. Then I grabbed him by his cloak and took him to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and said, 'Messenger of Allah, I heard this man reciting Surat al-Furqan differently from the way you recited it to me.' The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, 'Let him go.' Then he said, 'Recite, Hisham,' and Hisham recited as I had heard him recite. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, 'It was sent down like that.' Then he said to me, 'Recite' and I recited the sura, and he said, 'It was sent down like that. This Qur'an was sent down in seven (different) ways, so recite from it whatever is easy for you .
+Denesia McCureay Barbecho he knows he is lying Hun .. dont fall into his trap .. he even knows deep down that his religion is fundamentally wrong ... these people like to play games
“And if they call you a liar (Prophet Muhammad) remember that many messengers before you were called liars. And God will decide all things. Oh mankind, God’s promise is true. So do not let the present life deceive you and do not let the great Deceiver (Satan) deceive you about God. Indeed, Satan is your enemy so treat him as such. He only invites his followers to the blazing Fire. Those who disbelieve will have severe torment; and those who believe and do righteous good deeds, will have forgiveness and a great reward." (Quran 35: 4-7)
Honey what u quoted the hadith . I should say quote full hadiths .as for three goddesses . Quran claims that they aren't goddesses . in fact if read history of Islam. Khalid bin walid ( a Muslim general ) destroyed them during his campaign . second for seven dialect. In authority of mother hafsa and mother Aisha all other copies with different dialect were burnt . I invite you to come to India . I shall pay the expense of you . we shall go to Kashmir where the one copy of written by syedna Ali ra were kept it has also seal of caliph uthman . than we shall go to aurangabad where the copy which mughal sultan Aurangzeb written by his hand we shall see them . after this we go to city of nasik where the again old copy of Sadik shah huseini ( great grandson of prophet Muhammad pbuh) kept . even if you not satisfied I will take you Tashkent on my expense there we shall se another old copy which written by caliph . now if you found any word or alphabetical fault in every version I shall give whatever you want and as a punishment i shall cut off my hands. but if you failed you shall give the all expenses . and after that we shall take Qur'an of every sect of Islam sunni shia Sufi etc and than we shall see if they are different with old or not .OK inbox me I shall give you my tell no
Long live dr Zakir Naik from philippines
just be a Pinoy and live your life. Don't be an arab slave.
Alhamdulillah mashallah Allah hu akbar alhamdulillah mashallah wonderful video may Allah SWT guide all of us on the straight path always amen❤ love from India🇮🇳 may Allah SWT bless you my dear dr zakir naik and your family👪
the more and more i read the Quran, the more i want to memorize it
Don't memorise it ..plz understand..then u will leave that
Bstlybengali bro alhamdulillah mashallah wonderful may Allah SWT guide all of us on the straight path always amen❤ love from India🇮🇳
It’s total nonsense.
@@applemac100100 In what way?
SubhanAllah, Dr. Zakir naik you are amazing Mashaallah, may Allah grant you and us the highest levels of paradise.
JazakulAllah kheir brother, may Allah SWT grant you Jennah-tulfairdus.
Love this brother. He is absolutely clear. God bless him.
He is liar 🤥😂brother... I can expose his lies... Surah 2:234 n 2:240..see how God changes his mind within days 😂😂😂... And he lied by saying Quran says moon has derived light💡.. But there is nothing like that..
Imagine Koran in the heaven changing all the time
Revealed in steps not changed
Love you Dr.zakkir💙💙
How come allah reveal better verses? The best should come from him regardless of time n society.
Allaah revealed the verses according to the needs of the people at that time and to make things ease for them.
Allah is talking about previous revelations not the present Quran
He’s talking about the laws so verses in chapter 8 etc don’t count under law
If verses have been forever in heaven with allah and then get abrogated, they are not eternal. Muslims need to think critically.
Have you become a Muslim by now?
Quran not given as fast food...it was a step by step method made an ideal state.
The scriptures which was revealed earlier was given to that time for that people, and finally when it was the correct time to reveal the last and final revelation that will be there until the day of judgement for whole of humanity, Allah revealed it to prophet Muhammed (peace be upon him).
Allah did not cancel out all the earlier revelations, he either keeps it or advances it or removes it whichever is best for the people, if you go and check the bible and the torah there are verses which are similar to the Quran, we Muslims alhamdulillah follow them, don't know if those people follow it.
Do you think that people had same tolerance, thinking and mindset thousands of years ago?
That's why the previous revelations were either kept, advanced or removed by Allah, and made the The Quran the final Book until the Day of Judgement for the whole of humanity.
OK explanation, but it has a flaw. a Muslim must never say that only the last ayat made alcohol HARAAM. as every single ayat before the last said indirectly that alcohol is haraam. plz read them again with understanding an ul see. also, wats dangerous about saying alcohol was "halaal" before the last ayat of the Quran on the subject, is that in the previous scriptures the information of alcohol was already made Haraam by Allah. in proverbs suliman said. .. "wine is a mocker & strong drink is raging, so the wise must stay away from it". so when a Muslim says... alcohol was made Haraam only at the last verse in the Quran, a Christian can say... well our jahova is wiser that ur Allah because he already made alcohol haraam 2000 years before ur Allah. naozubillah. wat we must understand is Allah had Already pronounced on this, but because the ppl fell back into missguidance & corrupted most of the book Allah sent the last book wit the wisdom of not just "do this" or "don't to that" but with a rehabilitative nature. so every verse pointed towards alcohol being haraam & the last verse said plainly it is forbidden. just think... a man loves a woman, she tells him that in alcohol the harm outways the benefit then she tells him dont come to look for me if u drink. if the man is sincere & really loves & understands her he will want to stop drinking as he will want to see her all the time. also, if alcohol was halaal before the last ayat why didn't the prophet himself drink?? those who was waiting on a last & final ayat could have just looked an saw that muhammad pbuh in his dignified way never drank alcohol. but ppl always need a "clear/direct word" & would make excuses in not reflecting on the early ayats to so as to hide behind vails of ignorance. but Allah wanted them to think for themselves & parables is the best way to develop a sound mind. imaam ibrahiym ghany from trinidad.
There is no abrogation in Quran.
swiftspy Calling abrogation clarification (no matter how different 2 verses may be) does not solve the matter. It is just blindly accepting you guru's teaching. If a new law comes telling you to pursue and even destroy someone comes along it does not just clarify an earlier one telling you to, "live at peace with and even defer to the teachings" of that someone, it annuls the previous law - which in legal terms is to 'Abrogate' it. Please do not just accept the excuse saying this is clarification no matter how different the outcomes are - The eternal God does not change His mind between Mecca and Medina.
TomFielding I don't know why you are telling me all this. I don't have any Guru. My only source is the Quran. Peace.
+eric bantona Islam in the second passage is not referring to the way muslim apply Islam. Islam asks you, and all prophets, to believe in one creator and worship HIM alone.
+swiftspy very funny
+Ade Fegan Elabotate may be?
Allah never said " punishment" , or " something else" but SOLUTION.
What ab ntelligent answer barakallah
Masha Allaah.Jazak Allaah Khair.
If all that you say he is true Dr. Zakir Naik then with due respect let me point out some seemingly inconsistent parts.
1.S 2: 256 talks of no compulsion in religion......but
2. S 9:5 talks of "kill the polytheists....sit and wait in ambush....
3. S9:73 talks of Fighting disbelievers.
Compare these with surah 2:256 and you will see abrogation. If the text was handed down then how is it that one part talks of freedom of religion and the other talks of killing and fighting?
These are just a few of the direct contradictions in SENSE and so they are contradictions in fact.
Now look to your respectful Imam Ibn Bez and see what he frankly and truthfully stated about abrogation without mincing his words. Please see it for yourself.
The searching masses look to you and some others for a truthful explanation and they are often disappointed because of your familiar use of Taqyiyyah (lying in the defence of the religion) Nobody wants lies. They are in search of the truth.
In any event why should we lie to defend a truth?
One minute and thirty seconds in all he's said is "it not contradict "
Subhanallah
Pliss translate to indonesia, becausa I not speak english with better
MashAllah, good explanation
so according to you praying to jerusalem is the same as praying to mecca ?
.. think it though will you, before getting on your soap box
It doesn't say something else. It says solution
He said if The punishment wasn't there when it is suppose to be it would be contradictory. So why accepting stoning then !
Why substitution. Does God make mistakes?😂😂😂
My 6th grade chemistry book had no errors and contradictions. Does it prove something?
Ur chemistry book was published in the last 15 years... Quran was revealed 1400 years ago.
Ahmed Khan that proves nothing. Try something better.
Ebeer Can you be any stupider? The Quran is talking about religious scripture, not your science book. This proves me why you are so dumb and close minded that you can’t get a simple message then how are you gonna get an important point? Lol, you are talking about 6th grade but I guess you need to Pass 1st grade
Lazylads false scientific knowledge! More like made up.
Lazylads muhmmad was an uneducated thief, liar and the best deceiver in the known human history.
www.google.co.in/amp/s/maria911.wordpress.com/2009/09/13/192/amp/
So there is no contradiction in the Qur'an because the Qur'an says so, and that must be true because it says it is the clear truth, and that must be so since otherwise there would be a contradiction, but that's impossible as it says there is no contradiction.
Muslims, Naik's brain is wired in circles. The above is called circular reasoning and that's accepted only by idiots.
There are lots of clear contradictions in the Qur'an, which is why Muhammad stuck in the 2:106 verse that insults all but an idiot's intelligence. Hence, Q 4:82 says in effect that the book you are reading surly is not from Allah (unless you accept circular reasoning).
how to know which Quranic verses is abrogating and which one is abrogated??
can you please identify?😇
coz i want to know which one.
no verse of the Quran is abrogated but the Quran abrogated the previous books. the Quran has a rehabilitative nature & gradually reforms as an egg hatches into a caterpillar then to a cocoon then a butterfly. such is the wisdom of Allah. with humans a person who became a butterfly can fall back to a caterpillar as faith sometimes raises and falls. the rehabilitative nature of the Quran caters for fluctuations of faith.
abrogation has to do with canceling of previous was revealed and replacing of it with new one...so it has not to do with contradiction ....it has to do with reliability of the given revelation - action ....reliability is not reached
So,Allah make mistakes?😂😂
Always with takiya brainwashed tactics and explanations 😅😅😅
What do you und by the words there would have been in it many contradictions?😅😅😅 It never ever said there would have been in it NO contradictions.? There are so many contradictions inside your Quran 😅😅😅
Just goes to show you ( Abrogation = delete of the original) that the quran used today, is not the original.
missing verses of ahzab ahadith.
100% True brother......
So which punishment u will go.. Stoning them to death or closing in room ?? 😂😂😂 if she comits adultery divorce her.. Y u killing her??? Allah will punish.. This simply means Quran isn't from Allah at all thanks 🙏
Stoning to bible mei hai
i differ zakir naik here for defending Rajam (Stone to Death ) a fabricated Hadith !!
1. Exemplary Verses are not relevant to Abrogation at all .
2. Abrogation mean simply revealing something Better or Similar to its previous verse . OR more refined and simplified or in detail as compare to the previous verse.
3. word Nasakh / Abrogate is described in Quran only once in 2:106
4. actual issue was "Ra'ina "
2:104 "O you who believe! Say not (to the Messenger Peace be upon him ) Ra'ina but say Unzurna (Do make us understand) and hear. And for the disbelievers there is a painful torment.
whereas in 4:46 Allah describes same issue but says " it would have been better for them not to Utter " Ra'ina" . verse 2:104 is more Better , Simplified and Direct prohibition Order of NOT UTTERING the word "Ra'ina"
4:46 "Among those who are Jews, there are some who displace words from (their) right places and say: "We hear your word (O Muhammad SAW ) and disobey," and "Hear and let you (O Muhammad SAW) hear nothing." And Ra'ina with a twist of their tongues and as a mockery of the religion (Islam). And if only they had said: "We hear and obey", and "Do make us understand," it would have been better for them, and more proper, but Allah has cursed them for their disbelief, so they believe not except a few.
Conclusion : verse 4:46 is abrogated by more simplified and direct order of prohibition in verse 2:104. whereas 2:106 is simply describes such methodology of abrogation.
Rajam / Stone to death is not the part of Quran also Rajam ahadit contradicts with the Quran clearly.
punishment for fornicator is 100 lashes , married or unmarried is neither described nor its issue of Quran.
1. Quran simply says 100 lashes for fornicator 24:2
Mullah always interprets Quran in the light of hadith , Zakir is doing same thing , he is defending Stone to death hadith therefore changing the meaning of Quran.
2. just in next verse 24:3 Quran says " Fornicator does not marry except fornicator or polytheist....." by common sense , if a fornicator is no more on earth , who this decree is revealed for ?!! ... fornicator does not marry ... " simply mean he is alive , he is not dead , he or she is not punished stone to death.
3. punishment for married slave women is half then free married women 4:25 [ Pickthal , Yusuf Ali , Shakir , Dr. Ghali translations ] , Now what would be the half punishment of STONE TO DEATH ???!!!
Analyzing Immorality and Fornication in QURAN !
17:32 "And do not approach unlawful sexual intercourse. Indeed, it is ever an immorality and is evil as a way."
in 17:32 Fahasha/Immorality is described in General in which zina/Fornication is also included BUT Quran specifically separates the Zina/Fornication from Fahasha/immorality when it implements the Penalty/punishments.
Since Allah is Most Just , He describes the punishment according to the level of crime.
4:15-4:35 : a. confine them in houses, b. if Allah gives them another chance to live normal life dont confine them. c. refuse to share their beds, d.beat them (lightly), e.but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance).
Conclusion: Nothing is Abrogated regarding to the Punishments of Fahasha/Immorality and Zina/fornication.
May Allah bless us Hidayat to follow QURAN , Ameen !
+Abdullah Haq No there is another verse : 16:101 confirms there is abrogation in the koran .. it says there is abrogation because allah know best and calls us ignorant ! ... how can you take this stuff seriously ? .. there are other religions you could try
+Ade Fegan Brother there is no compulsion in ISLAM , if you want to practice another religion you can no problem at all :) , its upto you which path do you choose !
there are only two kinds of Abrogation in Quran
1. Verse of Quran Abrogates another verse of Quran , e.g 2:104 abrogates the verse 4:46.
Note: both verse are present there in the Quran. Allah does not Delete the verse from Quran at all.
2. Verse of Quran Abrogates another verse of Previous Book .
in this regard verse 16:101 says
"And when We substitute a verse in place of a verse - and Allah is most knowing of what He sends down - they say, " You, [O Muhammad], are but an inventor [of lies]."But most of them do not know."
Abrogated verse of previous book
6:146 "And to those who are Jews We prohibited every animal of undivided hoof; and of the cattle and the sheep We prohibited to them their fat, except what adheres to their backs or the entrails or what is joined with bone. [By] that We repaid them for their injustice. And indeed, We are truthful.
Leviticus 11:4
".....The camel, though it chews the cud, does not have a divided hoof; it is ceremonially unclean for you."
Leviticus 7:22-27
The Lord said to Moses,“Say to the Israelites: ‘Do not eat any of the fat of cattle, sheep or goats.
Now read the verse which abrogates the 6:146
16:115 "He has only forbidden to you dead animals, blood, the flesh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah . But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit] - then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
Allah does not call you ignorant , Allah says "..but most of them don't know "
why do you count yourself among those who dont know :)
May Allah bless us Peace ! Ameen !
+Abdullah Haq there are other ways for us to be good people none of which involve the controversy which typifies islam .. let's try another way brother
+Ade Fegan Brother if you find another way no problem keep practice it if its beneficial for your soul as well as not harming other souls !
+Abdullah Haq that is nice, but sadly islam is strongly associated with harming other souls and what is written in the koran does not offer any comfort to anyone who seeks assurances that this is not the case .. perhaps what is written in the koran will cause the downfall of islam
This is totally confusing nonsense.
Amantu billahi warasoolihi
Stoning isn't islam
If the Quran is the eternal truth of Allah, then why does he need to substitute something with something "better?" This is idiotic babbling.
***** how can something that is "eternally true," and was supposedly existing WITH Allah for all eternity be contextual? The "truth" of the Quran shouldn't be circumstantial, if it is what HAS existed for all eternity.
Here is what actually happened with the evolution of the Quran, since its doctrines CHANGE from one time to another. It is known which verses were "revealed" in Mecca, from those which were "given" in Medina, and the message clearly changes FROM one of tolerance and respect for "disbelievers," to one of intolerance and utter disdain after his move to Medina.
This can be illustrated in numerous instances, such as a Muslim's attitude towards those who "disbelieve." Verses 23:117 and 98:6 say that unbelievers will not prosper and are the worst of creatures. Verse 9:29 also asks believers to fight those who do not believe in Allah, the Last Day, His rules and His religion of truth. But verse 45:14 says otherwise:
"Tell those who believe, to forgive those who do not hope for the Days of Allah; It is for Him to recompense (for good or evil) each people according to what they have earned"
Also:
Indeed, Allah is with those who fear Him and those who are doers of good. 16:128
And, what about the Muslim's attitude towards Jews and Christians?
We believe in Allah, and in what has been revealed to us and what was revealed to Abraham, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and in (the Books) given to Moses, Jesus, and the Prophets, from their Lord: We make no distinction between one and another among them. 3:84
This was obviously given for a certain "circumstance," and yet, it is completely contradicted by this:
Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled. 9:29
(Is it not interesting that this verse suggests that Allah made certain things unlawful ALONG WITH "His Messenger." Is that not SHIRK? Is not "His Messenger" (Muhammad) a partner with Allah here?)
Clearly, there are verses in the Quran which make moot of others, because of obvious contradiction--which made abrogation (because Allah is all-powerful, and can make something MORE true than something that he "revealed" earlier--even though BOTH are "eternally true") necessary.
He substituted the previous revelations. Not the quran read the verse again. Example stoning was in the Torah but now in the quran it is flogging... he said to replace with something better...
Phillip Taalib Williams How can something in the Quran be replaced with something "better" if IT is "eternal?" That's ridiculous.
John Beam you mis understood.... nothing in the quran has been replaced... the previous revelations of the Torah,psalms,and gospel has been replaced by the quran.
Phillip Taalib Williams So says ONE MAN. You call him a "prophet," and you believe that he is, because he said so, and also, it says so in a document that came from the SAME MAN'S MIND. Really, it's the witness of ONE MAN, and the nimrods who believed in that one man. If the case you state were to be taken to a court of law (not a shariah court), it would be thrown out for lack of evidence.
👍
This man is just refusing to accept the obvious. If one verse says 'live in peace with the people of the book' and another verse says 'pursue them and destroy them' there is a plain contradiction. Does God really say live in peace with them until you're strong enough to murder them and then it is okay to wage war as you like? Is that God speaking or is it a man who can't be trusted?
It is interest to note however that this speaker talks not about alcohol alone in the beginning but about all intoxicants - but we find Islamic communities that would attack people for making alcohol but seem fine with others producing heroine, etc.
Hani, in your Quran
U THINK U ARE CLEVER THERE IS NO CONTRADICTION HERE .
QURAN 2V189-193 SAYS
189
وَقاتِلوا في سَبيلِ اللَّهِ الَّذينَ يُقاتِلونَكُم وَلا تَعتَدوا ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لا يُحِبُّ المُعتَدينَ
Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress. Indeed Allah does not like transgressors.
190
وَاقتُلوهُم حَيثُ ثَقِفتُموهُم وَأَخرِجوهُم مِن حَيثُ أَخرَجوكُم ۚ وَالفِتنَةُ أَشَدُّ مِنَ القَتلِ ۚ وَلا تُقاتِلوهُم عِندَ المَسجِدِ الحَرامِ حَتّىٰ يُقاتِلوكُم فيهِ ۖ فَإِن قاتَلوكُم فَاقتُلوهُم ۗ كَذٰلِكَ جَزاءُ الكافِرينَ
And kill them wherever you confront them, and expel them from where they expelled you, for faithlessness1 is graver than killing. But do not fight them near the Holy Mosque unless they fight you therein; but if they fight you, kill them; such is the requital of the faithless.
Or ‘polytheism.’
191
فَإِنِ انتَهَوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفورٌ رَحيمٌ
But if they relinquish,1 then Allah is indeed all-forgiving, all-merciful.
That is, if they give up idolatry.
192
وَقاتِلوهُم حَتّىٰ لا تَكونَ فِتنَةٌ وَيَكونَ الدّينُ لِلَّهِ ۖ فَإِنِ انتَهَوا فَلا عُدوانَ إِلّا عَلَى الظّالِمينَ
Fight them until faithlessness1 is no more, and religion becomes [exclusively] for Allah. Then if they relinquish, there shall be no reprisal except against the wrongdoers.
193
الشَّهرُ الحَرامُ بِالشَّهرِ الحَرامِ وَالحُرُماتُ قِصاصٌ ۚ فَمَنِ اعتَدىٰ عَلَيكُم فَاعتَدوا عَلَيهِ بِمِثلِ مَا اعتَدىٰ عَلَيكُم ۚ وَاتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَاعلَموا أَنَّ اللَّهَ مَعَ المُتَّقينَ
A sacred month for a sacred month, and all sanctities require retribution. So should anyone aggress against you, assail him in the manner he assailed you,1 and be wary of Allah, and know that Allah is with the Godwary.
TomFielding, its not contradict at all, bcause that verses you talked about, one verses is when its in peace, and the other is about defending yourself when you were attacked and expelled from your own land.
its really2 make sense, just read the Quran yourself, dont read it from islamophobic website crap
Just your brain and know that Creator-GOD'S words can't be contradictions. Satanic Human's words contradicts every minute. Law of the land claims to believe in peace, democracy and pluralism yet the Prisons are full of Black people, many are innocents and some are criminals. Meaning 2 kinds of law?
Right? To understand GOD'S Revelation yu first need to accept HIM. /A convert to Islam..
piss off
Peace of Christ be to you all Muslims. ❤️❤️❤️❤️
Dont lie about Christ.
Ok then if that's not the contradiction then the word contradiction doesn't exist in dictionary 😂😂.... Okay now check surah 2:234 widow women should remain in house fr 4 moths... Surah 2:240 window women should remain fr 1 year in house.. 😂😂😂how Allah changed his words in just continue verses within days he changed his mind... Your Allah hv no knowledge wht will happen in future??? Is this verse good or not... So simple is that it's not word of God rather rules of Mohammed himself nd Constitution made by human keeps on Amending.. Nd even after editing Quran from abu baker to uthman to 1924 Cairo edition it still has mistakes n contradiction😂
Read those verses again.
2:234
And those who are taken in death among you and leave wives behind - they, [the wives, shall] wait four months and ten [days]. And when they have fulfilled their term, then there is no blame upon you for what they do with themselves in an acceptable manner. And Allah is [fully] Acquainted with what you do.
2:240
And those who are taken in death among you and leave wives behind - for their wives is a bequest: maintenance for one year without turning [them] out. But if they leave [of their own accord], then there is no blame upon you for what they do with themselves in an acceptable way. And Allah is Exalted in Might and Wise.
Explanation:
234 verse explains iddah period. For which a women doesn't necessarily need to be in her late or ex husband's house..
Verse 240 applies only to a woman whose husband died. But before dying he allowed woman to stay in his home for 1 year i.e. in a wasiyat or death note.
@@azylumZ oh why is she only allowed to stay for only one year in house why not for lifetime???? 🤔🤔
@@azylumZ and read carefully both verses r talking about death of husband..
@@azylumZ answer my question.. Don't escape.. Why she should only be kept for one year??? Why not for lifetime..
@@vikasthakur3066 Escaping? Do you think answer to such complex questions can be given in one line. I shared the article with you so you can understand the iddah topic in detail.
The iddah is a waiting period that a Muslim woman observes after the death of her husband or after a divorce. After iddah period, a women is free to marry any other man. In case of divorce,it is about 3 months( Quran 2:228). In case of husband's death it is 4 months 10 days( Quran 2:234). The 1 year in verse 2:240 is not iddah period. It is related to inheritance (another topic). That's why i shared with you the article for your better understanding.
If you want to learn anything about the Quran, you should refer to a Tafseer Book as well as Translation. There's a context behind every verse. To understand that context, you have to learn about when,where and in which circumstances the verse was revealed. Then you will be able to truly understand the meaning of Quran.
taqiyya !!
paul davies no its not..
ohh yes it is xx
paul davies you do know that taqiyya can only be used in time of compulsion, right?
bullocks !!
paul davies yep, if the quran it explain the condition when you can use tayqiyya, only in compulsion is it allowed.
Mr. Zakir, the Quaran that is in your hand is not Allah verses neither it is the same as Muhammad was preached to his follower, is it ? it is written 20 years after the death of Mohhamad by memorizing it . and if it is true then how a ordinary people explain the almighty Allah verses and time to time substituted, means then it is not Allah word then.
WHERE DID U GUET THIS INFORMATION THAT QURAN WAS WRITTEN 20 YEARS AFTER THE DEATH OF THE PROPHET MOHAMED PBUH ?
WHY U HAVE TO LIE BE HONEST ,SPEAK THE TRUTH OR IF U DONT KNOW ANYTHING ASK FOR .
Usman compiled the Quran NOT WRITTEN
this is so beautifull preseved quran ,kalifa othman has combined the quran in to a book,instead of being in seperate pages,so it wont be lost and its allahs will,its always been the same quran and preserved till today .allah said in the quran we have bring down the quran zikir and we are to preserve it,just looking at this quran its a miracle,ALLAHO AKBAR
AND NOT ANLY THAT THE QURAN WAS MEMORIZED TO
If all copies of the Holy Qur'an were thrown into the oceans we don't worry a bit as the whole Holy Qur'an was and is fully memorized in the minds and hearts of so many of us Muslims since revealation and passed on to us by our forefathers. Allah Akbar.
I have watched some of Dr Naik's videos, and as usual he is twisting the answers.
One of the video he can not see anything wrong in a man of 53 having sex with a girl of 6 years, as long as the girl and Muhammad agrees to the marriage. "Who are we to say No If the prophet and the young girl agrees"
So if a man is 70 years old and see a child of 4 years "Would you like to marry me" the naive and immature girl says " Yes" without realizing what a marriage is?
Dr. Zaik you are making a fool of yourself.
One thing good as come out after 9/11 is that it has put Islam in the spotlight, Western scholars are reading and learning Arabic and exposing some of the things in the Quran and Hadith which I believe is totally unacceptable .
Boxtop Letter "One of the video he can not see anything wrong in a man of 53 having sex with a girl of 6 years, as long as the girl and Muhammad agrees to the marriage. "Who are we to say No If the prophet and the young girl agrees"
" A of 9 years ( although Muhammad ans Aisha got engage when she was 6 years old but the marriage was consummated when she was 9 years. Just wanted to correct this before somebody jump on this error.
Boxtop Letter Right. I mean U guys have sex with random boys and girls the whole year. that's not a problem. And a 53 years old man have sex with his wife (no matter what her age is) and U r behaving like Albert Einstein. Tell me more. :D :D :D :p :p :p
Btw, Aisha loved Muhammad (pbuh) more than anyone else and she reached her puberty already when they had sex. When She herself didn't complain about him, brother, who the hell on earth are u to complain? Dont u think u r being nosy? u r welcome.
+Boxtop Letter he married her when she was six .. she says in the koran that they had sex from when she was 9 (there are several references to this) ... the (poxy) koran states that a girl should be able to take the mans weight before having sex with him
+raqeeb tushar Nosey ? .. you have got a nerve .. She was NINE YEARS OLD when he raped her .. disobedience would have been punished SO WHY WOULD SHE COMPLAIN ?
Ade Fegan if u do your research then u will know that he married aisha at 6 but he never touched her until her puberty. And its scientifically proved that women from that time specially in desert area used to reach puberty at early age. So do your research first.
And u r complaining, Aisha never complained about the Prophet. She is the one who praised him the most. So what's your problem?? Marriage that time like this was normal. So you dont problem with one boy and a girl who are not husband and wife having sex with each other, but u have a problem when a man marries a girl at early age. SHE WAS HIS WIFE.
she was an adult like i said. Do your research on PUBERTY MATE. If you are comparing this soceity with that one then u r the fool here. That time Women were BURRIED ALIVE...Get it??? If he didnt took the responsibilities of those then they would be dead. DO u even know that Muhammad (pbuh)'s wives were divorcees and widows?? Only Aisha was the one who was not a widow or a divorcee. As for the answer to your question about her age, In Islam it is said a girl can marry when she reaches maturity, when she reaches menstruation. In Country to country things like this differ. The reasons are climate, area, her food and lifestyle etc and other things. For example today in india, the girl should be 18 to get married, in america most of the state says 16, in texas the girl can marry in the age of 14. If u research history u will see even Roman Emperors married girls as young as 8, The minimum age for marriage in the US-State of Delaware in year 1880 was 7 . So Y 7 here??? Brother, it depends on the climate, area, growth etc. in islam u can marry a girl if she reaches adulthood. And then again use a common sense here. Mother Aisha never complained about the prophet, if he did injustice to her then she would be saying "oh my god, he's this and that..." but she is the one that praised him much, more than any other wives.
Islam is true? Muhammad declared that he was told this by the Angel Gabriel so obviously Mohamed was a false prophet since we absolutely know this is a false statement:
“As for the resemblance of the child to its parents; if a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets a discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets her discharge first, the child will resemble her.” Vol. 4, Bk. 55, No. 546
thats weak hadits brother, not true
@@muhammadpedofilpbuh5250 lol paul false prophet cursed crossed worshipper spotted 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
did allah do the abrogation ??? lol,lol
Half mustache, full lie
Zakir lying *Again*The Quran has been altered and has 7 versions:Stressing the perfection, flawlessness and unchanged, unaltered nature of the Quran is perhaps the single most important assertion for those engaging in ‘Da’wah’, or Islamic prosletysation.The problem is, it’s simply untrue.Of course if you are a believing Muslim you have to believe that the Angel Gabriel recited words directly from Allah into Muhammad’s ear and that the current form of the Quran is word for word the same as each word recited by Allah through the Angel Gabriel into Muhammad’s ear.The facts, of course, are different.The Quran has been altered. The Quran has been changed.There are multiple ways of demonstrating this, even through using primary Islamic religious texts:(1) Firstly it is important to remember that the Quran was never actually written down into any single book during Muhammad's life. It was always recited. (2) Even during the period before it was written down, there is some evidence that the Quran was changed by Muhammad himself. According to Ibn Ishaq, the earliest source on the life of Muhammad, there was an additional verse in Surah an-Najm that Muhammad later removed, saying that Satan had tricked him into believing it was from God. The verse is commonly referred to as verse 20.5, because it was supposed to fit between 20 and 21. It is also knowns as the "Satanic Verse" The verse went like this:19: Have ye thought upon Al-Lat and Al-‘Uzzá20: and Manāt, the third, the other?20.5: These are the exalted gharāniq, whose intercession is hoped for.Later Islamic scholars came to deny that this ever happened. But it seems to me that the reasoning behind denying the veracity of this event has nothing to do with scholarly skepticism and everything to do with the dangers of the theological repercussions of accepting the veracity of this. After all, if Satan had tricked Muhammad into believing that this verse was from God, then how can we be certain that all the other verses of the Quran are from God and not from Satan? Also the idea that Muhammad could be tricked by Satan, even for a short time, flies in the face of the notion that Muhammad is the perfect man. From a non-religious perspective, the acceptance of the three traditional Pagan Goddesses into Islam makes sense when Muhammad was weak and needed reconciliation with the Pagans, and the removal of this verse later when he was stronger and no longer needed their support makes a lot of sense, for that reason I do not doubt the veracity of the event so much.Of course when you bring this up in a discussion, it is likely to cause anger and outrage among some Muslims, who will often deny that this event occurred, and will even assert that Ibn Ishaq was a liar or something along those lines.This is often one of the major problems of trying to debate with some Muslims over the veracity of the Quran. Many will assert that the Quran has never been altered, and when proof from the earliest Islamic sources themselves is shown that plainly states that Muhammad himself altered parts of the Quran, those Muslims will often become outraged and refuse to discuss any further.(3) There are some Hadiths that claim that portions of the Quran are lost because the only written parts of it were eaten by a sheep or a goat (depending on translation):Reported ‘Aisha (RA):‘the verse of stoning and of suckling an adult ten times was revealed, and they were (written) on a paper and kept under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) expired and we were occupied by his death, a goat entered and ate away the paper.’ (Sunan Ibn Majah, Hadith 1944) (Hasan)(4) There is a whole doctrine of Naskh, or "abrogation" in Islam. This is the notion that many verses in the Quran are lost and many others have been abrogated by later verses and should no longer be considered. According to Burton in the Encyclopaedia of Islam and the book "Islamic Theories of Abrogation", 564 verses were alleged to have been expunged from the mushaf (Quran), or 1/11th of its total content.(5) According to the traditional Islamic narrative, the Quran was standardized into a single, authorative text for the first time by Caliph Uthman about 30 years after Muhammad died. The way this was done was that Uthman collected all manuscripts of the Quran that had been written down by various people across the Empire, he then selected the "authentic" ones and burned all variant readings. Here is the Hadith in Bukhari that describes this:Bukhari: vol. 6, hadith 510, pp. 478-479; book 61Narrated Anas bin Malik:Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and the Christians did before." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. 'Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, "In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur'an, then write it in the dialect of Quraish, the Qur'an was revealed in their tongue." They did so, and when they had written many copies, 'Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. 'Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt. Said bin Thabit added, "A Verse from Surat Ahzab was missed by me when we copied the Qur'an and I used to hear Allah's Apostle reciting it. So we searched for it and found it with Khuzaima bin Thabit Al-Ansari. (That Verse was): 'Among the Believers are men who have been true in their covenant with Allah.' (33.23)In total there were seven different versions of the Quran according to this Hadith:Al-Muwatta Hadith Hadith 15.5 About the Qur'anYahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Urwa ibn az-Zubayr that Abd ar-Rahman ibn Abd al-Qari said that he had heard Umar ibn al-Khattab say, "I heard Hisham ibn Hakim ibn Hizam reciting Surat al-Furqan (Sura 25) differently from me, and it was the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, who had recited it to me. I was about to rush up to him but I granted him a respite until he had finished his prayer. Then I grabbed him by his cloak and took him to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and said, 'Messenger of Allah, I heard this man reciting Surat al-Furqan differently from the way you recited it to me.' The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, 'Let him go.' Then he said, 'Recite, Hisham,' and Hisham recited as I had heard him recite. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, 'It was sent down like that.' Then he said to me, 'Recite' and I recited the sura, and he said, 'It was sent down like that. This Qur'an was sent down in seven (different) ways, so recite from it whatever is easy for you .
+Denesia McCureay Barbecho he knows he is lying Hun .. dont fall into his trap .. he even knows deep down that his religion is fundamentally wrong ... these people like to play games
“And if they call you a liar (Prophet Muhammad) remember that many messengers before you were called liars. And God will decide all things. Oh mankind, God’s promise is true. So do not let the present life deceive you and do not let the great Deceiver (Satan) deceive you about God. Indeed, Satan is your enemy so treat him as such. He only invites his followers to the blazing Fire. Those who disbelieve will have severe torment; and those who believe and do righteous good deeds, will have forgiveness and a great reward." (Quran 35: 4-7)
CyberFlame Allahu Akbar. You nailed it. Direct answer from words of Allah.
She is a very good story teller😅
Honey what u quoted the hadith . I should say quote full hadiths .as for three goddesses . Quran claims that they aren't goddesses . in fact if read history of Islam. Khalid bin walid ( a Muslim general ) destroyed them during his campaign . second for seven dialect. In authority of mother hafsa and mother Aisha all other copies with different dialect were burnt . I invite you to come to India . I shall pay the expense of you . we shall go to Kashmir where the one copy of written by syedna Ali ra were kept it has also seal of caliph uthman . than we shall go to aurangabad where the copy which mughal sultan Aurangzeb written by his hand we shall see them . after this we go to city of nasik where the again old copy of Sadik shah huseini ( great grandson of prophet Muhammad pbuh) kept . even if you not satisfied I will take you Tashkent on my expense there we shall se another old copy which written by caliph . now if you found any word or alphabetical fault in every version I shall give whatever you want and as a punishment i shall cut off my hands. but if you failed you shall give the all expenses . and after that we shall take Qur'an of every sect of Islam sunni shia Sufi etc and than we shall see if they are different with old or not .OK inbox me I shall give you my tell no