Good present, however, there are 3 exceptions to the prohibition of the use of force. 1- Authorization by the United Nations security council persuant to chapter 7 of the UN Charter 2- Collective or individual self-defence pursuant to article 51 of the UN charter 3- Anticipatory (not pre empitve which is illegal) self-defence according to cusomary international law. (Caroline case).
Thank you for your comment. The video mentions that there are exceptions to the prohibition of the use of force, but since it is just an introductory lecture, I am not going into details.
Hello, could I ask that you please help me figure out the following issue of law “ even though the ICC does not make express provision for the doctrine of command responsibility , should it be read to include it in order to be consistent with International law? You help would be appreciated
I trust in you international law to help me in philippines owner michael salmon maharlika maragtas pilipina owner 01.4 oreginal title royal crounw of england 6 torens book of law manila bulitin vetirans law owner salomon philippines no justice no justice. International law to help may problem I trust you many people news people army general ferdenant marcos lawyer maharlika help I trust in you international law ..
Very helpful with very beautiful voice.
Good present, however, there are 3 exceptions to the prohibition of the use of force.
1- Authorization by the United Nations security council persuant to chapter 7 of the UN Charter
2- Collective or individual self-defence pursuant to article 51 of the UN charter
3- Anticipatory (not pre empitve which is illegal) self-defence according to cusomary international law. (Caroline case).
Thank you for your comment. The video mentions that there are exceptions to the prohibition of the use of force, but since it is just an introductory lecture, I am not going into details.
Hello, could I ask that you please help me figure out the following issue of law “ even though the ICC does not make express provision for the doctrine of command responsibility , should it be read to include it in order to be consistent with International law?
You help would be appreciated
Thank you for your comment. There is a difference between state responsibility and individual criminal responsibility. Could you specify the question?
Well explained
I trust in you international law to help me in philippines owner michael salmon maharlika maragtas pilipina owner 01.4 oreginal title royal crounw of england 6 torens book of law manila bulitin vetirans law owner salomon philippines no justice no justice. International law to help may problem I trust you many people news people army general ferdenant marcos lawyer maharlika help I trust in you international law ..
Consent derives from VLTC 1969