Oumuamua UFO photographed near Mars, Phobos, according to Russian Cosmonaut!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 июн 2024
- In 2017, the mysterious interstellar object Oumuamua flew through our Solar System! But, before then, a doomed Soviet probe photographed another colossal UFO in Mars orbit near Phobos. Shortly thereafter, the probe mysteriously vanished.
#space #alien #uap
MERCH DISCOUNT CODE: MUA15
Please support my NEW PATREON CHANNEL! AS LITTLE AS 10 CENTS A DAY!!
DISCORD MEMBERSHIP, EXCLUSIVE CONTENT AND EARLY RELEASES PLUS 15% OFF MERCH!
/ angryastronaut
www.paypal.com/paypalme/Angry...
Follow me on twitter:
/ astro_angry 
Развлечения
Angry astronaut really gives a one of a kind examination of ufo cases that ya can’t find anywhere else on the tube. Thanks buddy
Thanks so much for watching!!
totally agree, i dont miss a ufo episode from this channel
Same here! @@ilftc8892
Also agree. The actual knowledge you explain to the layperson is invaluable. Like Joe Friday. Just the facts.
Indeed, he has truly found his niche😂
Arthur C.Clark foresaw this in 1973 with his novel RENDEZVOUS WITH RAMA.
He surely did. He was trying to show how to do it with known physics.
Loved reading Rama.....
Oumuamua was a practice throw.
The bugs won't miss next time.
Would you like to know more?
I'm doing my part! *smiles at camera while holding bug spray
Please do tell...
They're from an ugly planet, a bug planet
They're from an ugly planet, a bug planet
The gold is always in the comments!
The Soviet cosmonauts announced what had happened & showed the pictures on television for everyone to see.
I'm a simple space nerd I see Oumuamua, I click as soon as I can.
Sounds like a koolaid flavor
Well done 🫡 carry on
WE ARE NOT ALONE!!!!!
No. And anyone who thinks we are either has an agenda, or is scared.
Of coarse, beacuse you're in the know 😉@@intheknow7659
I find fascinating that what we see at 9:30 looks very similar to what appeared to be going into volcanoes like Popocatépetl on the famous livecam video :)
YES WE ARE!!!!
@@jeremyedney6608PROVE IT
Our intergalactic prison guards making sure we haven't escaped Earth
I suspect there actually is such a thing tbf. Who's to say that the reason we haven't seen life outside of our solar system is because we've not been allowed to.
lol
hmmm have you seen what humans actually DO, war is our no 1 activity, I wouldn't let humans go anyway outside of their system
Darth Vader? Is that you?
The bible calls us prisoners with Satan and his fallen angels and demons as the warden and guards ....this because satan thought he could do a better job than God so God gave him the chance i. This age of flesh ...
One of your best pieces! No silly drama, some good facts, good historical background! Thanks!
@richardzeitz54....I just subscribed because I agree with your above points and am planning to share this video with others.
That 2014 Martian object is bizarre! I remember the Phobos 2 probe and the long cylindrical thing that came up and kissed it goodnight. Thank you for reporting on this!
They have been photographed next to Saturn's rings too, on several occasions.
At the time some people referred to them as "Ring Shepperd's" and it is suspected that they hide in and maintain the rings.
They are truly huge in size!
It sped up because there is an attractor out there. An unknown body that still affects the orbits of Pluto and Neptune .
Planet x?
@@JDBluedevil Very well could be. Astronomers know there is something big out there. It must be a dark body that reflects little light. It may be found out there in the ort cloud or just outside it. Could be a dead drawf star companion to our sun. Could be anything but it has a strong gravity field.
The main questions are; why didn't it burn up when it was that close to the Sun, WEBB should have some tracking on it being this significant, if everyone is saying its a rock then why can it change trajectory that fast (even with the suns gravity, and what is making this thing maneuver like this? I think we found something.
Thanks for the episode.
Once again, the people that know everything, don't want you to know!
Its a cigar its a pancake so its this thing
What? Webb got sent into space 5 years after this!
It's not significant. James Webb Space Telescope has significant work to do. Tracking Russian disinformation just doesn't qualify.
@@curlyspikes7114my god you mean.....
NOM-X is a time traveler?!
Best Oumuamua documentation video i have seen.
Nick Henning is a very good artist! To me, anyone who can draw or paint like that looks like magic. Fun Fact: Oumuamua's eccentricity is 1.2. Anything greater than one is a hyperbolic trajectory and would not naturally return to our solar system. The Russian's report that it has returned is therefore kind of mind-blowing.
And impossible.
It couldn't return unless it could, at least, stop and come back the way it left.
AI art generators are pretty good artist I agree. Durrrr
Gravitational pull?
@@ADAM_truthfinderz It's on an escape trajectory. When your speed is escape velocity or higher, your orbit goes to infinity, and the curve of the orbit is a hyperbola.
We should totally have a probe ready at all times that can land and attach to a asteroid going fast so we can hitch a ride with it and get data
it has been stated by many other astrophysicist, that if the outgassing was composed of hydrogen that none of the detector used to observe the object could detect hydrogen
But if it was outgassing, then the rate of tumble should have changed but it did not (stated in the video).
@@angelag9172 that's assuming uneven ablation
Oumuamua is red in color indicating a metal component. Using rudimentary electrodynamic theory we understand that certain charged particles and fields (in this case from the Sun) will induce current in conductive metals. The currents in the object will in turn be connected to its own flux field which will in turn interact with the Sun's field and its charged particles, therefor causing the seemingly inexplicable acceleration given the objects size and possible mass. And by the way if someone asks you what time really is....Tell them it's
time = relative duration no one will be stumped anymore. And the reason you can't go back in time.....is because you can't reverse a duration. Let's stop the nonsense.
How do you know what colour it is?
@@cannotfindmyshoes3 NASA has confirmed its color is red
Excellent point! I've read about experiments where a satellite extends a conductive tether to apply a charge to, to interact with magnetic field lines and the solar wind. I'm surprised your point hasn't been made before! In fact, if it was conductive, it almost surely would have behaved like you say!
Just found the channel. Love your perspective, acknowledging the unknown while covering the mainstream… You put it all together really well. Thx 🥂
The channelers have been saying we are getting more visits because of our ascension. Not saying that’s what I believe. I’m just trying to learn about everything. Even the woo stuff.
Glad you’re covering ufo/uap topics!
I appreciate that you take this seriously but also examine the stories for evidence. Thank you.
The known Phobos shadow also shows both an umbra and a penumbra. The unknown shadow is much sharper edged.
Have you analyzed the raw Phobos 2 mission ISK data? You know it's publicly available right? That "object" had some very unusual characteristics for an "object" such as the following, appearing static across 3 frames, but only in a single color channel, (green). This object was completely invisible in the other 2 color channels. So, what do I think? Not an object, that's an electronics failure. Or, the aliens can completely block component light waves by individual channels, but they just can't get green quite right. TBH, it was for sure blown out of proportion, and logical reasonable people, are often not informed about those key details from the raw ISK data. Go back check me if you want. I'm not lying.
Thanks for bringing that up about Phobos. It's very interesting and fascinating.Kind of scary too
Not that interesting. It was for sure an electronics failure. The data supports that.
There was no "object" it was a glitch. Else-wise it's a giant object that is completely invisible in 2 of the 3 color channels in the ISK raw data. (It only appeared in 3 frames, statically, and only in the green color channel.)
I love this stuff! Very few touch this topic thank you for putting all together politely.
Interesting article Jordan! I love it! Well done covering such a subject in a critical and objective way! Subscribed!
@ 3:00 now, but I like the new show opener!! Slick and Angry.
First we have the unknown objects near Earth in 1952, then the unknown objects near Mars in 1990, then Oumuamua in 2017, then the object being studied by Avi Loeb in the Pacific. Something is going on, and I'm glad you're covering these things. By the way 2I/Borisov did look like a comet, but Its composition was quite unusual.
People like you keep these stupid theories going 🙃
Not saying you're wrong. But to me it just sounds like alot of speculation for the past 80 years without much in the way of proof
21/Borisov is indeed an unusual object. It demands closer examination.🧐
I captured a photograph of an object like that over my house. I had a weird feeling that I was being watched, and I took a picture as quickly as possible without looking. I had the suspicion that something would be there and something was.
A cat!
FYI this bunk (sorry to be a buzz kill folks). That line in the pic that is the “probe” was in almost every picture that was taken no matter what the Russian camera was taking pictures of. The camera was messed up at some point before it eventually died. Still doesn’t take away from the ooga-booga rock that was thrown at us tho! That object is a fun story.
Your statement is bunk. Source: I reviewed the raw ISK data from the Phobos 2 mission. The object is only in 3 frames, but it's position and silhouette are static in those 3 frames. The other notable detail, corroborating electronics failure, rather than a real object, is that it is only present in the green color channel of those 3 frames. Completely invisible to other 2 color channels.
If it helps: I had not seen or heard of that specific cylinder you show at 18:09. It is remarkably clear for such a photo. Without corroboration, we would file that under interesting and see if anything like it pops up later. Nice reporting!
I've seen that many times. But not always are there pictures of the empty first stage, tumbling down.
🚀🏴☠️🎸
Absolutely brilliant! Mr Angry at his best👏🏻love this episode
Quite interesting sum-up with new elements Thx
Amazing video thanks for putting it together
Mr. Angry, I think you have found your new niche.
Brilliant, excellent video. The gorgeous visualization of Oumuamua's trajectory really helps pull together how it looked, what it did, where it went, and why it was so extremely unusual. Learning about Marina Popovich--who was a hell of a badass--and the eerie photos and coincidences regarding the Soviet Mars rover was exciting and stimulating. One can't help but wonder if Marina headed off into eternity ushered by the exit of our first documented interstellar object ✨🪩💫. Thank you so much for what you do
Earth won't pass through the Milky Way galaxy's plane for another 30 million years. However, Earth's orbit around the sun and the sun's orbit around the Milky Way's center take the solar system on a 60,000 year journey up and down through the galaxy's plane. This vertical oscillation can take Earth into different environments, such as areas with high star formation or high-energy comets. Some astronomers think this oscillation could be linked to mass extinctions on Earth, such as the extinction of the dinosaurs 60 million years ago.
Wow, that thing by Mars is compelling.
You have a great channel here, new subscriber, Been interested in Oumuamua since it was first discovered and I think its one of the most compelling things we as a species have ever found out there and I try and watch everything I can find on it. I dont always go for the Alien theory but in this case my gut tells me it is of alien origin, The way it entered the solar system not on the ecliptic but from the top down, and it entered close to the solar systems centre which is quite the time and energy saver and the fairly close earth flyby seems planned, and the spinning is a great way of creating artificial gravity, then a quick slingshot around the sun and out with an increase in speed, that to me is smoking gun evidence, will keep following your content, thanks
Thank You for your honesty.
As in 217 Oumuamua was first detected I recalled the Star Trek “Tin man”, which was almost a foresight of the interstellar object we see now.🤔
Note: It was first observed after it passed the Earth, the trajectory is an extrapolation based on the - possibly completely false - assumption of it being a naturally occuring object in space. The observed flight-path could be a completely deceptive fabrication by the object.
Love your content bud!
It's always incredible how media take over our imagination! When we think of Oumuamua, I'm sure all of us remind the first pictures of that celestial body depicting an elongated, cigar-shaped, rocky object, turning around itself. However, even though that was actually the first depiction scientists made about Oumuamua appearance, as it got closer and closer, their depiction switched from a cigar-shaped to a pancake-shaped planar object, circular on its edges, with a cyclic turnover that explained its rythmic variation in brightness. It was that shape that made Avi Loeb think it might be some sort of solar, or rather, astral sail that due to some unknown phenomenon, started turning on its own center of mass. That would beautifully explain how it could get extra acceleration via capturing photons from our own sun on its escape phase. However its cigar shape is now discarded even though whenever we talk about Oumuamua we always return to the cigar-type object, over and over again. Pancake or cigar, however, both shapes are unknown in usual objects in our Solar System, where natural objects, under the natural influence of gravity and eons, tend to be spheroids. As long as I remember nobody has ever picked up a pancake-shaped planet, or a comet or an asteroid. And, assuming our Solar System is a good example of what uses to happen in others, that very shape is another indicative of an artificial origin.
Sure they have. Just ask the flat earthers 😂
Oumuamua was never imaged with enough resolution to say what its shape was. All constructions are products of human imagination, not scientific fact. As Churyumov-Gerasimenko taught us and we have forgotten so quickly, reality is much superior than anything we can imagine. And it's more interesting. Fact: we don't know the shape of Oumuamua. End of story.
Awesome new intro Angry!!!
Anyone remember the movie "Lifeforce"? That female vampire had a body that any man couldn't resist 😅
No, but I'm giving you a Like for typing "female vampire."
I saw it at the movies! It’s a forgotten classic. And yeah, naked female alien vampire chick was absolutely smoking hot…
@@numbersix8919 lol, she was definitely a female! The only actor I recognized in this movie was Patrick Stewart (Capt. Picard)..It wasn't a great movie to me, but a pretty good sci-fi feature..Sort of had zombies in it to..
@@planetdisco4821 I'm also giving you a thumbs up for "smoking hot naked vampire chick." I'm getting pretty interested in this movie!
@@scottnixon2899 I don't like zombies, I think they are a bad influence on society. But everything else about it sounds great!
The shadow looks like Phobos, just from a different angle. The probe had to be relatively close to the surface. I imagine that the orbit near the moon is close enough.
Professor Loeb has caught a lot of flak, but he remains a serious scientist in my book
Fortunately, your book is not authorative.
@@RockinRobbins13* authoritative. Fify professor
@@LuciFeric137 Look! A typo. Probably invalidates the law of gravity. Loeb is a liar and not practicing science. I've proved it many many times and nobody has ever shown me to be wrong or even said I was wrong.
Hint: show where Loeb ever made the slightest effort to connect even one of his two millimeter spheroids of formerly molten metal has anything whatever to do with bolide CNEOS 2014-01-08. He states as fact that all 150 or 400 (choose one. He's claimed both numbers) of his spheroids are from that object. Show where he established that to be true for even one of them.
Since there is no connection between his "recovered material" and his pet bolide, then anything he says about his "recovered material" can be safely ignored as bunk.
We can get into his misrepresentations as to the nature of his pet bolide, CNEOS 2014-01-08 if you choose.
@@RockinRobbins13 Arguments from authority - Part of any good baloney detector kit.
@@wezleyjackson9918 This is not authority as in your fake logical fallacy delusion here. This is authority by the definition of "reliable, recognized by experts as the proven truth, worthy of your attention and investigation."
The actual fallacy of "argument from authority" is what Avi Loeb uses, hiding behind his position at Harvard University so that he illegitimately garners the halo of respectability that position. Meanwhile he commits such scientific crimes as failure to make any attempt at connecting any one of his 40 or 200 spheroids (he's claimed both and one is a lie) has any connection whatever with the bolide CNEOS 2014-01-08, which he even attempted to rename as IM1 so any Internet searches just return to his misinformation.
That's the perfect example of "argument from authority" in action. But it is far from the limit of the scientific crimes Loeb commits.
Thank you for raising the point and positively begging me to define its use and show an example.
I get it. This is like people telling you to drill holes in your radiator in the summer for better cooling.
Thank you it's been way to hot here
….too….
You can’t even do that bc your brake fluid will come out…
Read a book bro geez..😂
Good job!!
That absolutely looks like what the Soviets detected with their infrared or radar camera and with the camera that caught the shadow being cast on the surface of Mars this is pretty compelling brother!!!
Funny you should mention UFOs coming from Mars near the end of the video.
Donald Keyhoe said once that he thought the UFOs might be using Mars as a staging area for visiting Earth as UFO sightings increased during months where when Mars was on the same side of the sun as the Earth and the distance between Earth and Mars was closest.
That was based on statistical analysis done by NICAP
Sir … always interesting always fascinating!!!
THX
CJM
50+ y RADAR TECH & RADAR R & D
Awesome ty for great video
Early evening in Aug 1987 departing Mt Hotham-Omeo(Ski trip) Australia, entire family witnessed UAP flying for 30 mins, eventually it landed then took off leaving a 50m diam. bush fire in paddock.
Clear skies, near zero Celcius, no lightning. Dad senior helo pilot (ex-RAAF) had no explanation.
(Seperatly in early 70's Mum was personal secretary for JPL manager Canberra Apollo program running documents to Parkes Dish, often she was followed by lights in sky.)
Thankyou Angry!!
I commented on a video i think it was on Cosmic Road that was a craft someone had filmed and it looked like a baby Oumuamua. Thats what it looked like 😎😎♥️
Excellent 🙏
Latoerson here but the shadow on Mars at 14:39 makes me think of an unusual visual event on Earth called a "Glory", where a shadow of a person is projected for example, up on top of a nearby mountain range. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable could check out if some astronomical version of the same type is possible in that setting.
Yes, this is a classic case that Art Bell covered extensively in the 90s and it’s as incredible and mind-blowing today. He had on his late night show from the desert all of the key players and experts for detailed discussions about the Phobos incidents.. We all miss him whether we know it or not!
I'm 54 now. It's starting to get harder to SORT the "STRANGE", LET ALONE KEEP UP WITH IT😊
It's 2024, and the 3 most "ADJUSTED"
things since the DARK AGES
are
1) GENDER
2) GRAVITY
3) REALITY
😮😮😮😮😮
(NO hard feelings, but I prefer #2 )
unsharp blobs remain uncompelling
That's part of the Alien stealth tech, to appear fuzzy on camera.
Awesome episode sir ✌️ ♥ 🌏 🛸
I wish Oumaumau would stop, turn around and come back!
The trajectory difference seems substantial. Depending on the mass, which is estimated to be between 10^7 to 10^9 kilograms, and the observed acceleration of 0.1 mm/s², it would require 1000N to 100kN of thrust. That seems a lot. if we go with the minimum of 1kN, it would require a solar sail of 110 square kilometers size at 1 AU distance from the Sun.
With outgassing however it looks quite different. If we assume a large body of frozen hydrogen, evaporation of about only 1kg of hydrogen per second can produce 1kN of thrust, and at 1 AU you only need 300 m2 of surface to gather that amount of power from the sun to evaporate the 1kg of hydrogen per second, and with 100kg/s and 30000 m2 you can get up to 100kN thrust.
So the hydrogen outgassing hypothesis seems possible to me at first glance. It was a surprise how much thrust is needed, and how much thrust is produced by outgassing Hydrogen in a vacuum, but this comes from the exhaust velocity at 14K which is about 1072m/s. However, if we burn Hydrogen with Oxygen, we can reach 41km/s exhaust velocity, so outgassing is not that great compared to a rocket engine, although real rocket engine produce only about 3kN per kg fuel mass flow per second and much lower exhaust velocities around 3km/s.
In the real world rocket seem to reach only about 1/10 of the exhaust velocity theoretically possible, so with outgassing we also might have to increase mass flow by an order of magnitude, but we would be at 10kg/second of evaporation to produce 1kN of thrust, but at that rate the whole thing would evaporate in 12 days; otherwise 120 days. It still seems possible, but the object must have lost significant mass either way, unless it uses some reactionless drive, which seems unlikely.
However, if that object could maintain 0.1 mm/s² acceleration all the time using some magic drive, it would gain about 3km/s per year, reaching light speed in about 100 years.
EDIT: Some papers mention Nitrogen outgassing instead, but this produces much less thrust, only a quarter of what Hydrogen produces. However, a Hydrogen object might not survive that long in space, while Nitrogen sublimates around 64K and lasts longer in space. A 1km diameter ball of frozen Nitrogen would last 1 billion years in interstellar space, a ball of Hydrogen only 160 Million years, and at 1 AU from the Sun the Nitrogen ball lasts 868 days, Hydrogen only 134 days, so both would kind of work, but while the Hydrogen ball seems fit the thrust, the Nitrogen ball lasts much longer, but it could have started much bigger, so we don't know how long it traveled and how big it started.
DISCLAIMER: I used ChatGPt 4-o for many calculations and constants and did not check every detail, and I caught GPT making some conversion errors. The numbers I got in the end seem plausible, but treat with caution.
I'm a huge fan of the "Phobos cigarshape case" :) I saw vids of Marina Popovich talking about it, the Russians scientists were not 100 % positive regarding the ET hipotesis but they were really opened to it for this case :) That's so cooool that you link Oumuamua to the "Phobos case" :) When they started talking about Oumuamua I immediately thought it was fascinating that years before a large cigarshape object could have destroyed the russian probe ! It reminded of this case and was asking myself if I was the only one ! Thanks to your vid I know now this answer is : nope :)
You may be interested to know the original raw ISK data from that mission is publicly available. The data supports electronics failure, sadly. The object appears static across 3 frames, and only displays in the green color channel, it is completely invisible in the other 2 color channels. That is more likely to indicate electronics failure, than a real tangible object.
About the cassini picture, as an amateur astronomer and having seen UFOs myself, i think it looks to me like a long exposure pic of a crescent moon, like mb a jovian moon that is closer to the probe than the distant stars, so it appears cylindrical bc the crescent is moving relative to the distant sky bc of paralax, just saying, bc that shape don't look like a perfect cylinder, like it's a series of exposures
I think that writing on the bottom says something about any planet but Europa?
Bro your regular NASA and space stuff is good. This? This makes me want to buy you dinner and take you to the movies. ❤🎉
Let's hope they brought this working payment system I've heard about in comics.
We dropped the ball the first time around now is our chance to intercept and study this one !
Interesting..ty
Has anyone tracked/projected Omuamua to its next destination?
Sandboxx dude is back...
We are living in strange intergalactic times…
I believe that they have been watching us for quite some time.
Why do we keep hearing things like "Oumuamua has come back and it's mad as hell?" As far as I know it hasn't returned.
3rd gen farmer in Michigan here. Great vid! Treat yourself to reading Shane, Jack Schaefer.
Indeed.
When people do 🚫 not trust Authority of any sort, then All professional types will never convince the public of any unusual activity... We did this to us ..
If authorities didn't lie so much we might trust them more.
Wouldn't it be great if it was a picture of a giant UFO with the face of a robot on the front of it and small wings with little saucers on them. Yep I just described the Grendizer cartoon robot yay ! 😄😄😄😄
Please… luv what you do . The music is just silly ….again luv the content. Peace
Aliens threw a rock at us to see if we would respond.
Thought I remembered hearing that the goofy shape/composition of Oumuamua made most of our measurements/theories suspect
So the tube light structure that you have in question towards the end of your video is a photo that has been talked about before and there have been other ones on secure team 10 about 2 to 3 years ago they found a few things that look just like this in maybe Hubble imagery for an app? I'll find it
Norman Bergrun, Ringmakers of Saturn
Yes, that’s what immediately came to mind. Fascinating!
Our equipment constantly improves so we see more.
Just so happened to come at the perfect angle to slingshot around the Sun.........hmmmm
Not only to slingshot around the sun, but to do so timed to make its closest exit rendezvous with our planet Earth.
@@falstaff59 are they sending us a message?
@@hawaiiangunner If they are, it's above my pay grade. Other than calculating the odds of that occurring without precise intent of some kind...which may impress us into awareness with the exactness of its executed maneuver.
They forgot to mention the picture as blurry as heck. There's no telling what it is.
Love your show, but also love the groovy tune played in the lead in..Is it an actual song?...i.e 3+ minutes long?
interesting. Can't we point our JWST on it?
Years ago, I read the shadow on Mars was the shadow of Phobos. I believe that is the case.
Yes I will have to agree. I'm going with Occam's Razor principle on this.
But the shadow is at least 15 miles long.
@@cannotfindmyshoes3 Depends on the angle/what time of the Martian day. Early morning or evening could make an elongated shadow.
Yes, this was stated and confirmed years ago but the UFO shadow is making a comeback despite this already being debunked
Nope, that’s absurd and discredited by the available evidence. The object is literally visible in one of the other Phobos II photos.
Amummyomooma is definitely looking more and more strange each year
Nobody's looked at it since 2017.... just saying.
For sure we are checked.... since century .... !!!!!!
Finally some information about Oumuamua that's not Elon Musk click bait BS, Thank you
Put that moon shadow closer to the horizon and it appears more elongated
Perhaps Oumuamua was a test to see how well people could determine its capabilities. Nothing fancy just few extra moves and see if people can catch those. Find the limits. Perhaps it was doing something else too, that was missed and that gives them (them!!) some room to maneuver.
Sarek confirms your thoughts ..he told me yesterday at happy hour…!
Picture seen at 10:30 and 15:30 was edited. Pictures at 16:30 and 17:30 are not the same. It is a pity not to analyze these pictures. That should be discussion nber 1.
Makes sense. If we have been around for infinity in an infinite universe then there would be remnants of former civilizations floating around in instellar space.
I flicked a dub before Mum caught me. I didn’t realise I flicked it that hard.
We’re just coming back to save ourselves. Again.
I wonder if frame dragging was taken into account when calculating Oumuamua's acceleration?