[4K] Is Cartier Santos Large Blue dial Haute Horology? Review & Macro Analysis | Hafiz J Mehmood

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 окт 2024

Комментарии • 183

  • @HafizJMehmood
    @HafizJMehmood  3 года назад +17

    Like most of you, I am a watch enthusiast and admirer at heart.
    Follow my watch journey @ instagram.com/hafizjmehmood/
    I wouldn't be doing videos to spread the awareness and share the passion, if this wasn't all for the love of watches

    • @Jannerjaunts
      @Jannerjaunts 3 года назад

      Your videography and editing is mesmerising. 👌

  • @thomasoliverpryce4914
    @thomasoliverpryce4914 3 года назад +59

    Outstanding review. Said all that need to be said and nothing that didn't. Watch manufacturers should kneel with fear before your macro lens, that finishing was totally unacceptable at this price point.

  • @Howtomantv
    @Howtomantv 3 года назад +34

    Hafiz, you consistently deliver the most objective, useful, and direct watch reviews to be found anywhere on the Internet. It seems like a simple formula: a little history, a little commentary on design and construction, plenty of wrist shots in different positions and against different colored shirts, detailed macro shots... just exactly what anyone who gave it any thought would create. And yet, you are the only one I have found that delivers the goods.

  • @Panthers1521
    @Panthers1521 2 года назад +16

    I don’t understand why this watch isn’t hotter. It’s stunning, historic, unique, and a strong name.

    • @ricardseglitis2922
      @ricardseglitis2922 Год назад +6

      Will definitely rise throughout years

    • @IamnotJokic
      @IamnotJokic 4 месяца назад +1

      Because it fails at the one thing a watch must do. Be easy to tell the time.

  • @aurelius388
    @aurelius388 3 года назад +6

    Best place to see how a watch actually wears on the wrist! Thank you for making these videos, Hafiz!

  • @chaitanyakonduru2271
    @chaitanyakonduru2271 8 месяцев назад +1

    Hafiz - your video quality and content coverage is one of the best on RUclips. It's hard to find better macro shots than your videos :). Keep killing it bro!!

  • @sidewinderxx
    @sidewinderxx 2 года назад +14

    I bought the Santos recently
    Thanks to you, I took a loupe and inspected the dial, which was flawless. I showed the salesman your video including the macro shots of the damaged hands. He was shocked and said that should never come out of Cartier and if they had that in store they'd replace it immediately.
    I suggest taking a loupe with you when you go to buy

    • @stephenc1337
      @stephenc1337 2 года назад +3

      If you pay close attention to the video, in particular when the seconds hand is moving, you can notice that the smudges and the debris is on top of the crystal and not inside the watch. The minute hand does look bad though.

    • @beermansf9791
      @beermansf9791 Год назад +1

      It could be a fake he is reviewing.

    • @Schnitzeljunge
      @Schnitzeljunge Год назад

      @@beermansf9791😂

  • @exmoordogman6558
    @exmoordogman6558 2 года назад +4

    The quality and content of your videos is simply sublime.

  • @SirMopy
    @SirMopy 3 года назад +5

    I know most of you guys would prefer the white dial medium Santos de Cartier... But holy this blue was always my jam and I prefer it over the more classic white...

  • @kahuhipajae4088
    @kahuhipajae4088 3 года назад +3

    Every watch you wear looks perfect, not sure how you do it. Great video.

  • @BartMan59
    @BartMan59 7 месяцев назад +1

    Cartier is GOD Tier of all watches! What I don't like about the applied markers is the hidden Cartier on the roman numeral VII or V, otherwise a wonderful piece from the House of Cartier with so much horological history.
    Because you mentioned it in your video, the FIRST three dive watches date back to 1953 by three watch makers - 1. Rolex Submariner; 2. Zodiac Sea Wolf, and 3. the Blancpain 50 Fathoms. Where both Rolex and Blancpain went lux and high price, Zodiac remains true to their humble roots. Another GREAT vid JM - tku.

  • @_echnaton
    @_echnaton 3 года назад +7

    Should've reviewed the Medium/silver version with the iconic blue hands.

  • @Don-wo1wo
    @Don-wo1wo 2 года назад +3

    Will purchase this piece real soon this will be a rare one for the future

  • @MWC888
    @MWC888 3 года назад +3

    While the Santos is a nice classic design. The macro shots really show the sloppiness of the finishing. Omg

  • @jinhong530
    @jinhong530 3 года назад +7

    Wow, you reviewed this pcs !
    I am waiting mine too , hopefully can get by next week

    • @Judah.Rosenthal
      @Judah.Rosenthal 3 года назад

      Would love to hear if you see the same poor finishing on the dial.

    • @MyVideosWillCalmU
      @MyVideosWillCalmU 3 года назад

      @@Judah.Rosenthal It wouldn't be the same across the board. Same when this channel shows Rolex with the same imperfections on the GMT especially.

    • @jinhong530
      @jinhong530 3 года назад

      @@Judah.Rosenthal too bad I don’t have macro lens

  • @frankrobertnilsen7355
    @frankrobertnilsen7355 3 года назад +4

    Finally! Thank you for this one, i was waiting for it. Thanks for highlight the points that was not on the top, but yes, regardless, it still is the worlds first wrist watch. And look good for the eye from a distance. Great job, well done :)

  • @Jbcd602
    @Jbcd602 3 года назад +9

    Every time I see the Large Santos on anyone with a regular/ small wrist, It just looks large. Ended up going with a Medium for my 7” wrist. Iconic watch none the less and great review!

    • @n.h187
      @n.h187 3 года назад

      Does it wear too small? Thinking of getting the medium for my 6.5" wrist. Agree the large wouldn't look right on regular wrists.

    • @Jbcd602
      @Jbcd602 3 года назад +3

      @@n.h187 I don’t think so.. I tried both on in the AD To be sure.. I was wearing a speedmaster 42 that day by the way. And the large really stood out as slightly large. The medium was much cleaner and better sized for the style IMO. I also have a black bay 58, and newest airking I wear. My sweet spot id say is 38-40 usually.

    • @MyVideosWillCalmU
      @MyVideosWillCalmU 3 года назад

      @@Jbcd602 agreed 💯 The large almost looks bigger then a 42 because it's square. I have the medium and I have a 6 and 3/4 inch wrist and it's the one to get. Iconic and stunning piece. They will discontinue that blue as it's just a phase. The white and blue hands 35mm medium is wear it's at, hence the reason I didn't think twice.

    • @Makta972
      @Makta972 6 месяцев назад +1

      Went to buy a medium left with a large. Medium is incredibly small in real life on my 17cm wrist. It was really like trying a lady's watch 😅. Large is perfect; More presence and way more masculine. Medium looks good on Instagram but it's tiny and sI usually hate bigger watch.

  • @OperationNonsense
    @OperationNonsense 2 года назад +1

    No one should be surprised by the blemishes under macro, nor the subpar build quality. Cartier is a jewelry house, not a watch maker after all. Most people don’t want to admit it, but Cartier is the brand that puts the word “fashion” in “fashion watches”.

  • @n.h187
    @n.h187 3 года назад +40

    The medium white dial is the one to get. Such a sleeper in the watch world, knowing the current mania which is ravaging the watch world, long may it continue.

    • @storck08
      @storck08 3 года назад +4

      Indeed. I just wish they made more dials to choose from. A gray medium santos would be perfect.

    • @muntublackson4757
      @muntublackson4757 3 года назад +13

      @@storck08 can you imagine an olive green and eggshell coloured indices dial? 🔥

    • @storck08
      @storck08 3 года назад

      @@muntublackson4757 that would be sweet!

    • @mathiasdurand9535
      @mathiasdurand9535 3 года назад

      My midsize santos, my only one actually!!! As you say, more dials could be cool, but Cartier are not the must fun brand and still for me traditional

    • @n.h187
      @n.h187 3 года назад +1

      @@muntublackson4757 😍

  • @jamessmith3599
    @jamessmith3599 3 года назад +7

    Excellent review! While other channels have a macro presentation you go into all the micro details which I truly appreciate. I’d definitely buy this watch now seeing how you can remove or make adjustments to the bracket so easy. I’d also go with the white dial for better legibility.

  • @Ten.to.one.handmade
    @Ten.to.one.handmade 3 года назад +5

    Would love to see a macro review of the latest large manual wind Tank Louis. There seems to be none on RUclips

  • @casarealecanecorso9309
    @casarealecanecorso9309 3 года назад +6

    This piece for the “price point” outshines most, seriously. It is drop dead gorgeous to look at, different than the normal watches, has history, innovative, to me, easy to read, thin as a slice of butter, can be used casually or for dress.
    Additionally, most $20K and above watches with a macro lens are not even close to where they should be, perfect. For instance, the royal oak does not even have a quick set date in 2021.
    The only watch in this price range that is nearly perfect is Grand Seiko.
    Wonderful review, I think you were very indifferent and highlighted the pros and cons. Great work.

    • @Kr0nicridah
      @Kr0nicridah 3 года назад

      For $20k, you shouldn’t be expecting perfection. Also, AP’s 15300, 15400 and 15500 all have quick set dates. The 15202 doesn’t have it because it uses caliber 2121, which is a JLC movement from the original 5402 kept for heritage purposes.

  • @MyVideosWillCalmU
    @MyVideosWillCalmU 3 года назад +7

    Been waiting for this review ever since I see you post it on the community post ..I have the same just purchased but in the medium and white dial. The smart link bracelet just takes it to another level. Stunning piece, just not a fan of the dark blue dial, if it was a Vacheron Constantin overseas sun burst blue or a bluesy Sub Rolex suburst dial, it would be more eye catching. The QC issues on this model is not good. Iam so glad I got the medium white dial.

    • @casarealecanecorso9309
      @casarealecanecorso9309 3 года назад +2

      This piece for the price point outshines the Vacheron, seriously. Macro on the Overseas is also disappointing for the price point. With that said, most $20K above with macro are not where they should be, perfect.
      Wonderful review, I think you were very indifferent and highlighted the pros and cons. Greta work.

  • @vassilis_zy
    @vassilis_zy 3 года назад +5

    The most elegant watch ever. I bet classic dial would look far better under macro...

  • @macoyupadoodle
    @macoyupadoodle 3 года назад +4

    Im a stickler for finishing but the Santos is a watch i would still buy knowing all its imperfections

  • @watchexplorer321
    @watchexplorer321 2 года назад +3

    Ya, everyone running around with a loop
    😏. If your lucky enough to get one, do and enjoy. Its a dream come true in blue👍👌

  • @ticktology
    @ticktology 3 года назад +3

    Excellent review. The Medium white dial would be the Cartier I’d consider. I’ve seen the large on other people’s wrists and it looks awkwardly big. The macro shots unveiled disappointing quality from a “luxury” brand 🤦🏻‍♂️.

  • @johnnymassaBRAZIL
    @johnnymassaBRAZIL 2 года назад +1

    What a fantastic review Hafiz! Great job! Sharp as always

  • @jeremydahm2124
    @jeremydahm2124 3 года назад +5

    Elegant piece. I'd go one size down personally on my 6.7 inch wrist but I'd wear that for sure. Bracelet is incredible but I also have become a fan of a taper. Wouldn't kill the deal on a mid size version.... The thinness is lovely. Only a column wheel chronograph is excusable over 13mm. Everything else needs a thin eta if the in house is tall as heck...(eh hem...Tudor)

  • @andyvu4577
    @andyvu4577 3 года назад +1

    For Pilot and aviation enthusiast, large blue dial will be the one to purchase, IMHO

  • @stonec2166
    @stonec2166 3 года назад +2

    Thank you for the wonderful review. I love mine smudges and all, I find it mesmerizing. Keep up the good work.

  • @cisthepanda
    @cisthepanda 2 года назад +3

    I prefer the cartier santos in large. The medium looks bigger on wrist shots.. but if you try it on and look at yourself in the mirror and see it with your whole body, its too smaaaalll for me at least. like the dial is almost only as big as the fingernail on your thumb.......

    • @lukehutchins6545
      @lukehutchins6545 2 года назад +1

      Agreed. My wife loves the medium for her, I liked it for me as well but felt overall the large was where its at

  • @BonnerRepublik
    @BonnerRepublik 3 года назад +1

    I always enjoy your videos. I'll add my voice to those requesting a review of the medium white dial.

  • @vadimdon
    @vadimdon 3 года назад +3

    Very nice watch with a poorly made dial indeed. I would love to see a review of Chopard alpine eagle 41mm. I like that watch very much and hope you'll make one day a video with it

  • @Alexander82387
    @Alexander82387 3 года назад +2

    Hey Hafiz you make the best watch videos on RUclips!! Thank you! Funny I just wanted to write you and request a Santos de Cartier video 😅 I think this piece is too big. I love the midsize Santos 💙😍

  • @superlativeopulence
    @superlativeopulence Год назад

    Very good review. It changes my mind of actually buying the blue dial version of this watch. I'll keep my Santos large with white dial.

    • @davidbrown9947
      @davidbrown9947 Год назад

      @@bondking0077 He made it plain that the dust, dirt, and scratches cannot be seen by the naked eye, but only under a powerful macro lense.

  • @TheHoth1
    @TheHoth1 2 года назад +1

    What a shame…this is my watch crush for the time being. Almost ready to walk into Cartier store to check it out. Gotta being my loupe with me:)

  • @sanghoonlee5171
    @sanghoonlee5171 2 года назад +1

    I wish they made this blue dial in medium size for my scrawny wrist 😢
    Edit: Cartier just announced a medium blue Santos!

  • @garybedfordis
    @garybedfordis 3 года назад +1

    I love you dude - zero fucks given. Also loved the octo vid. Your standards are high.

  • @yannickstrumpler3561
    @yannickstrumpler3561 3 года назад +1

    each of your videos is a piece of art 😍

  • @bobbydazzler1780
    @bobbydazzler1780 2 года назад +2

    Nice looking watch. I love how it wraps around the wrist in an ergonomic way. Tool free adjustment of the bracelet and strap switching is state of the art. My only concern is that the movement is fairly average having only 42 hours of reserve which is behind even Tissot and Rado these days. Perhaps it’s just meant for a special occasion one off wear. I like the black out version for the lume. But overall it’s a lot of tech for the money and away from the gravitational pull of all things Rolex which has become something of a running joke in recent years.

  • @scottfulps2065
    @scottfulps2065 2 года назад +1

    Such an excellent, thorough review! I wish Cartier had an automatic option on sizes other than XL models, (like Must), which are huge on the wrist.

    • @DWilliam1
      @DWilliam1 Год назад

      The Santos de Cartier comes in medium.

  • @eddiejones2578
    @eddiejones2578 3 года назад +4

    Love to see your review of the Omega Globemaster Annual Calendar. A great watch.

  • @freddyrequena4021
    @freddyrequena4021 3 года назад +6

    Please review the medium the two tone version. Thank you!

  • @jaegermeister1968
    @jaegermeister1968 2 года назад

    Your videos are just fantastic. The Cartier is a very beautiful watch with an independent design, but the quality of workmanship is far from the price range.

  • @animarku570
    @animarku570 3 года назад +1

    Your videos are special , keep it up the good work

  • @asura2545
    @asura2545 3 года назад +2

    I love it! Wearing mine while watching this :D

  • @dionisiosotela8554
    @dionisiosotela8554 3 года назад +1

    Very nice review Hafiz, under the macro, Cartier needs to be more careful in their finishing, more if you think in the heritage of the brand, and the price you have to pay for the watch.

  • @stefanogoldoni5059
    @stefanogoldoni5059 2 года назад

    Fantastic review. Happy to be a subscriber.

  • @MrExelban
    @MrExelban 2 года назад +1

    Well this Apple Watch is more expensive than I thought! Altough looks way nicer.

  • @dingodave3966
    @dingodave3966 3 года назад

    What a beautiful watch. I’m yet to see one in person. Definitely one to aspire too. This or the Medium.

  • @EverydayWatchGuy
    @EverydayWatchGuy 2 года назад

    This was an amazing and balanced presentation of the Santos. Many thanks!

  • @animarku570
    @animarku570 3 года назад +1

    Bracelet is a winner of course, but i wish they made the screw heads aligned

  • @donaldneo4317
    @donaldneo4317 3 года назад +6

    Thank you for the review, was thinking of getting the blue over the classic silver dial but since the applied markers smudges and the lume sucks... will go with the classic silver. Btw can I suggest that you add the lines and numbers when showing the watch dimensions like your comparison video between OP and DJ 😉

    • @stonec2166
      @stonec2166 3 года назад

      You really need to look at this blue dial in person, it’s mesmerizing. Try on both and make your opinion.

    • @donaldneo4317
      @donaldneo4317 3 года назад +4

      @@stonec2166 I have tried both, the blue dial is beatiful but I agree with the review that its not very legible, the silver dial is classic Cartier, less sporty. So after seeing the macro shots, I will go for the classic silver.

  • @CaptCanuck4444
    @CaptCanuck4444 2 года назад +1

    I would love a ceramic bezel to prevent scratches. Better yet, ceramic case and bezel.

  • @SLO7HProductions
    @SLO7HProductions 2 года назад

    One thing is that you cannot see the debris, dust and smudge marks with the naked eye most likely. But, they are asking a lot of money for this watch, one would have thought that they put a lot of work and care into making the watch, but this just makes it seem like it's overprices.

  • @erythuria
    @erythuria 3 года назад +2

    I'd love to see some macro shots of the Santos Medium!

  • @christophernye6148
    @christophernye6148 Год назад +1

    I love this watch! ❤

  • @Lorenzo1972.
    @Lorenzo1972. 2 года назад +1

    The flaws shown in the macro shots are appalling. Could you have been dealing with a fake? Is the white dialed Santos as bad?

  • @blackbob1977
    @blackbob1977 3 года назад +1

    Very good review, as usual. Thank you! Nice watch but I little disappointed about size. When I tried Santos large on my 6.5 wrist, that was huge. I’m seeing a video with your 6.5 wrist and it’s look ok.

    • @bdg5593
      @bdg5593 2 года назад

      Bro same

    • @lukehutchins6545
      @lukehutchins6545 2 года назад +1

      I've just shy of 7 inch wrist, bought large. My wife liked the medium on her but in truth I could also have wore medium no problem

  • @pipat147
    @pipat147 3 года назад

    thanks for great review again!! I am waiting for you to review GIRARD-PERREGAUX - Laureato 42mm in Steel !!!!

  • @chasehollen1602
    @chasehollen1602 2 года назад

    Awesome review, thank you so much!

  • @atothek302
    @atothek302 2 года назад

    I was in the market for one of these; not anymore. The macro lens revealed a lot.

  • @bdg5593
    @bdg5593 2 года назад +2

    pure class.

  • @scottlalonde2878
    @scottlalonde2878 3 года назад

    Another great review, Hafiz, thank you.

  • @ml2799
    @ml2799 3 года назад

    Thank you, just thank you, this one is on my radar.

  • @truper232424
    @truper232424 2 года назад

    Brilliant. Thank you, lad.

  • @fabfour289
    @fabfour289 Год назад

    Cartier, pls update the medium size to 38.5mm x 46.0mm that would feel like 40-41mm round watch. This 39.8 x 47.5 looks n feels like a 42mm round watch. Thanks for the vid, man.

  • @robertlock6041
    @robertlock6041 3 года назад

    Excellent review of a potentially exquisite watch Hafiz. But Cartier does need to improve its quality control...

  • @Judah.Rosenthal
    @Judah.Rosenthal 3 года назад +1

    “Putting the watch under the macro the results are…” (commercial!!)

  • @michaelmallal9101
    @michaelmallal9101 2 года назад

    My father born 1904 too. Nice.

  • @andrewgiblin3468
    @andrewgiblin3468 3 года назад +2

    I do love the aesthetics of the watch I still have a minimum expectation of the finishing of a luxury watch, this simply doesn’t make the grade! Unfortunate really as the design is beautiful!

  • @aussieexpat
    @aussieexpat 3 года назад +1

    I wonder if the silver dial with blue hand exhibits any of the similar craftsmanship issues.

    • @Judah.Rosenthal
      @Judah.Rosenthal 3 года назад +1

      You’re terrific made a pretty good video. I didn’t see any of these issues. And I don’t see in mine but haven’t looked under a loupe. ruclips.net/video/xPLwVuz-VvY/видео.html

    • @aussieexpat
      @aussieexpat 3 года назад

      @@Judah.Rosenthal ive looked at silver dial tank under a loupe and it was perfect... but... the magnification in this video is better than my loupe.

  • @Maarten_official_account
    @Maarten_official_account 3 года назад +1

    No watch is safe for the macro but this one really disappointed me in the way that I changed my mind from "maybe this should me on my shortlist" to " I'll pass". When the finishing is this poor I don't think it's just an incident. too bad because it does look great, especially on provided leather strap.

    • @najo1408
      @najo1408 3 года назад +1

      for macros try a grand seiko at this $ point.

    • @Maarten_official_account
      @Maarten_official_account 3 года назад +1

      @@najo1408 I know I should but GS just doesn’t do it for me. They have some interesting dials but in general I’m not a fan of the design.

    • @MyVideosWillCalmU
      @MyVideosWillCalmU 3 года назад +1

      It won't be the same across the board. He may have been unlucky. I put mine under the loop and it's perfect, this channel shows Rolex and others with QC issues. It happens, not good at the price point of any luxury brand.

  • @me-bh7zs
    @me-bh7zs 3 года назад

    Inner clasp is pretty sharp. Gave ma a major discomfort. Did you notice that?
    Surprised because it is left unrounded!

  • @azaas
    @azaas 3 года назад

    And this ladies and gentlemen is exactly why when you're looking to dunk that kind of money on a dress watch, you are better off with a JLC
    You lose nothing from an aesthetics perspective and you gain everything from a finishing quality/movement pov vOv

    • @sidewinderxx
      @sidewinderxx 3 года назад

      What if design is more important to you than finishing or movement?

  • @joohokim3563
    @joohokim3563 2 года назад

    It's a great video.
    How many inches (centimeters) is the wrist of the model in the video?

  • @Wrist-rolls
    @Wrist-rolls 3 года назад +12

    Oof the finishing is poor for such an expensive watch. No excuse when you have perfect finishing from Grand Seiko at the same price.

  • @burhanjohncena
    @burhanjohncena Год назад +1

    To be fair the price point is not haute horology

  • @davidbrown9947
    @davidbrown9947 Год назад

    Look at a Rolex , under a Macro Lens and you will see similar, or Patek, JLC, or AP

  • @rickythomson808
    @rickythomson808 2 года назад

    I’m glad I’ve seen your video as I was thinking about adding this watch to my collection,you’ve saved me a small fortune.Thanks.

  • @stebesplace
    @stebesplace 3 года назад

    Finishing seems to be like many other brands sadly, including the crown. Thankfully you can’t see these with the naked eye usually, still bothersome.

  • @Topgqrst
    @Topgqrst 2 года назад

    I liked the critique of the watch

  • @danieljovanovic2135
    @danieljovanovic2135 3 года назад +1

    Great video 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @vipnetworker
    @vipnetworker 7 месяцев назад

    At 6:39 - This is a beautiful watch, but up close it is shockingly unimpressive.
    Seems like the attention to detail of an Ali Express watch. I have to wonder if this is a knock off???

  • @craig2100
    @craig2100 3 года назад +1

    Nice video. But agree with your assessment

  • @v-gun9735
    @v-gun9735 3 года назад

    Great video. Can’t believe the poor finishing on the hands and hour markers.

  • @thatmexicanguy2989
    @thatmexicanguy2989 3 года назад

    I was really interested in the Cartier Santos finishing and it kinda makes sense their finishing standard 🤷🏻‍♂️ I thought the hour markers would be better but it’s still a gorgeous watch

  • @stephenwilliams7056
    @stephenwilliams7056 2 года назад

    I can't help wishing they would line the screws up on the case.

  • @StarofDavid616
    @StarofDavid616 2 года назад

    Im more interested in the model in his videos that his watch review

  • @anibaluriarte3676
    @anibaluriarte3676 2 года назад

    I opt for Cartier Tank MC blue

  • @Jannerjaunts
    @Jannerjaunts 3 года назад

    I recently tried one on after lusting for one. The clasp felt cheap and don’t like the fact the screw on the bezel arent lined up 😬. On the other hand it looks beautiful on the blue leather strap

    • @Judah.Rosenthal
      @Judah.Rosenthal 3 года назад +1

      Jack Forster did a deep dive on this years ago. Personally, I think the “wabi” aspect is appealing and we’d all be disappointed if they lined up. Additionally, the screws in the bracelet are for show so it’s def on purpose that they don’t line up.

  • @hefestus01
    @hefestus01 2 года назад

    Very helpful presentation

  • @ncasim
    @ncasim 3 года назад +2

    Can you do a "medium" santos review and place it under the same macro lens?

    • @Judah.Rosenthal
      @Judah.Rosenthal 3 года назад +3

      I have the medium so would prefer him not. lol.

  • @roybatty4687
    @roybatty4687 2 года назад

    Why does it have number 4 on the dial incorrectly as IIII instead of IV?

    • @0xl30
      @0xl30 2 года назад

      To have more symmetry in the dial

  • @davidb9531
    @davidb9531 3 года назад

    Shocking quality under macro really for a £6k watch

  • @larolarore9673
    @larolarore9673 3 года назад

    Great video can u do the medium size

  • @dgdave2673
    @dgdave2673 Год назад +1

    A review without discussing anything about the movement at all ?

  • @jlo1423
    @jlo1423 2 года назад +1

    Great review. You missed nothing.

  • @yidong5567
    @yidong5567 3 года назад

    what do you think about the skeleton version?